Division of General Internal Medicine Hypertension Impact ...
Transcript of Division of General Internal Medicine Hypertension Impact ...
Division of General Internal Medicine Hypertension Impact Project
September 21, 2017
Integrated Network Summit
Presented by: Mark Earnest, MD, PhDLauren Drake, Wagner Schorr-Ratzlaff MD, Huong Lam MD, Laurence Williams MD, Mary McCord MD, Hillary Chrastil
MHA, Mary Kozloski, Carmen L. Lewis MD, MPH
Background
• Goal: To achieve 70% hypertension control across both our General Internal Medicine practices.
• Strategy: Five evidence-based domains with 1-3 strategies each
• Setting• Anschutz Internal Medicine ~ 4,700
• Lowry Internal Medicine ~ 2,400
33%
63%
67%
37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
February, 2016 June, 2017
Anschutz Internal Medicine
Providers with 70% Control or Greater
Providers with Less than 70% Control
27%
88%
73%
12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
February, 2016 June, 2017
Lowry Internal Medicine
Providers with 70% Control or Greater
Providers with Less than 70% Control
EDUCATION
Patient Education Materials Quarterly BP Measurement Technique Trainings
• Medical Assistants (MAs) participate in ongoing educational sessions
• Includes:• Overview of BP• Cuff sizing• Patient positioning• Automatic BP machines• Manual readings
Previous outreach criteria:• Patients age 18-59
• Last BP > 140/90
• Average of the last 3 BP Readings > 150/90
• Last PCP visit 6 months ago or longer
Expanded outreach criteria:
• Patients age 18-59
• Last BP >140/90
• Average of the last 3 BP readings > 140/90
• Last PCP visit 3 months ago or longer
269
504
280
95
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Lowry (n=549) Anschutz (n=599)
Outreach Results
Attempted Resulted in Visit
OUTREACH
Anschutz
• Pharmacy
• Recheck & review
• Encourage Self-monitoring
Lowry
• Physician paired with a trained RN
• Collaborate & manage complex hypertensive patients
• RN provides education & support via telephone / MHC
• Recheck & review
AHA HBP Algorithm Including:• Patient education• Medication titration• Lifestyle modifications
TREATMENT &
COUNSELING
SELF MONITORING
No Co-Pay BP Checks Home BP Checks
• Encouraged self-monitoring as part of treatment via the MD/ RN HTN clinic and the Pharmacy HTN clinic
Summary n %Total # no-charge BP Checks 94# Unique patients 84BP =< 140/90 57 60.6%Escalated to RN 32 34.0%Escalated to MD 2 2.1%Sent to ED 1 1.1%
CURRENT FACULTY # Pat
ients
age
18<=
59
# w
ith B
P <= 1
40/90
# pts
unco
ntrolle
d#
additi
onal co
ntro
lled p
ts to
mee
t goal
% <
= 140
/90
Goal
Johnson, Michelle 20 16 4 - 80.00% 70.00%
Jordan, Michael 87 69 18 - 79.31% 70.00%
Doe, Jane 12 9 3 - 75.00% 70.00%
Test, Doctor 33 24 9 - 72.73% 70.00%
Lee, NP 11 8 3 - 72.73% 70.00%
Green, Mario 57 41 16 - 71.93% 70.00%
Red, Allison 14 10 4 - 71.43% 70.00%
ALL 796 538 258 20 67.59% 70.00%
Diaz, Director 77 52 25 2 67.53% 70.00%
Day, Dean 91 61 30 3 67.03% 70.00%
Physician, Miss 24 15 9 2 62.50% 70.00%
RESIDENTS 144 88 56 13 61.11% 70.00%
Last, First 61 37 24 6 60.66% 70.00%
Name, Name 12 6 6 3 50.00% 70.00%
AUDIT & FEEDBACK
LOWRY IM OP TEST, DOCTOR NO TEST, PATIENT 888888 53 12/11/2015 06/16/2015 152 96 132
LOWRY IM OP TEST, DOCTOR YES JOHNSON, TEST 222222 62 6/24/2015 09/09/2014 133 80 144
LOWRY IM OP TEST, DOCTOR YES DOE, JANE 131313 68 6/17/2015 06/17/2015 138 75 143
# Patients with HTN: 3
# Patients with last BP <= 140/90 2
% Patients with last BP <= 140/90 66.67%
Last Practice Visit
Last
PCP
Visit
Last
BP
Systolic
Last
BP
Diastolic
Average
BP
SystolicDepartment Provider
BP <
140/90
Patient
Name
MRN Age
AUDIT & FEEDBACK
54.55%
50.89%51.72%
57.63%56.14%
52.78%
57.02%54.10%
61.11%
68.24%
71.71%
56.39%
60.33%58.90%
57.96%
62.62%
56.02%
52.17%53.61%
59.73%
61.75%
66.07%
40.00%
45.00%
50.00%
55.00%
60.00%
65.00%
70.00%
75.00%
80.00%
Feb-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Oct-16 Dec-16 Feb-17 Apr-17 Jun '17
Resident Hypertension Control (Ages 18-59)
LOWRY RESIDENTS ANSCHUTZ RESIDENTS
Uncontrolled Patients: A Deep Dive
144, 83%
29, 17%
Hypertensive Patients with Uncontrolled BP (N=173)
Uncontrolled patients who are NOT actionable
Uncontrolled patients who are actionable and may benefit from anintervention
47, 33%
35, 24%
28, 19%
14, 10%
13, 9%
4, 3%
2, 1%1, 1%
Reasons Patients Were Not Actionable (N = 144)
BP is adequately controlled in Primary Care/ home measurement
Patient did not follow up
Provider is actively intervening on patient. (lifestyle modifications or med titration)
Following PCP's most recent intervention, BP is now controlled
Medication non-adherence
Other medical issues have taken priority
No longer a patient with this provider/ clinic
Patient refused intervention
In Summary
• Push individualized bi-monthly data to providers
• Focused work with residents
• Patient education materials
• Training for MAs
• Outreach
• AHA HBP Algorithm
• No co-pay BP checks
• Home BP monitoring
Lessons Learned
• Pursue improvement in multiple domains
• Monitoring the multiple data streams used to support hypertension improvement is key for improvement work
• Accurate panel attribution is imperative
• Pushing actionable patient-level data is a meaningful exercise
Future Applications for Population Health
Providers receive
actionable patient-level
data
DashboardAutomated process
to push data