Diversity Update 2020€¦ · Diversity Update 2020 October 2020...
Transcript of Diversity Update 2020€¦ · Diversity Update 2020 October 2020...
Diversity Update 2020
October 2020
apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum
From 2011 to 2020 § 4.9 percentage
point increase in Minority Enrollment
§ 2.0 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment
Percent Enrollment of Minority Students
Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority/minority calculations.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20
Minority Students as a Percentage of All Students (All Levels)
Collection of Southeast Asian status begins
Minority Students, 18.8%
Targeted Minority Students, 10.4%
Demographic Variables for Analysis
This presentation includes variables for which we have available from student data, including:§ Race/ethnicity§ Income level§ First-generation in college§ Gender§ Geographic location dataInformation is not systematically available for all groupsthat are important to inclusive excellence at UW-Madison.It’s also important to note that data presented should not imply acausal relationship between the demographic variable and the outcome presented.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
Race/Ethnic Categories: Students
Ø Continued terminology from Plan 2008/Lawton Grants
Ø Includes all Asians, useful for national peer comparisons.
• Targeted Minorities include:» Black/African American» Native American» Hispanic/Latino/a» Southeast Asian
(Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong)
• Minorities include:» Targeted Minority
categories» Other Asians» Native Hawaiians
Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application. This information is then aggregated for reporting and analysis
International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with state/federal guidelines.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
Race/Ethnicity ReportingReporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity InformationIn 2010, the federal government (through the Department of Education) implemented national standards for the collection and reporting of race/ethnicity data for university students and staff. This collection allows for the reporting of multiple race/ethnic identities in a way that was not possible prior to 2010. The major differences between main data reporting options are explained below.Subsequent slides in this presentation use the Federal reporting methodology.
Reporting Feature Federal Count All
Results in single count of students P
Prioritizes Hispanic/Latino(a) over all other values P
Reports categories that are not reported by students themselves P
Reports race/ethnic values only for domestic (non international) students P P
Reports ALL students who indicate a particularrace/ethnicity P
Used in data reporting and peer comparisons P
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
Counting Students by Race/Ethnicity:National Standard vs. Duplicated Counts
The Federal method of reporting race/ethnicity impacts enrollment counts:
• All students reporting Hispanic/Latino(a) are categorized as such, even if they also belong to additional racial groups
• Non-Hispanic students reporting more than one race are reported as “two or more races”.
• This lowers the number of students reported in the singular race categories when counting via the Federal method.
• To count all students who identify with any single racial/ethnic group the “count all” method should be used.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
Federal, 1,000
Count All, 1,569
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Black/African American Students
Count All, 2,736
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Hispanic/Latino(a) StudentsFederal,
2,736
Federal, 105
Count All, 511
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Native American Students
This section includes information on:• Enrollment– Undergraduate– Graduate/Post-Bachelor’s– School/College– Peer comparisons
Includes breakouts by race/ethnicity, gender, geography
Enrollment
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
Percent Enrollment of Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority or minority categories.
From 2011 to 2020: § 1.9 percentage point increase in
undergraduate targeted minority
enrollment§ International
Students: 9.4% of undergraduate
enrollment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
Targeted Minority
Students, 11.7%
Minority Students, 19.8%
International Students, 9.4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduates
• 11.7% of all undergraduates are targeted minorities.
• 13.1% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are targeted minorities.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
9.9% 9.9% 10.1% 10.3% 10.2% 10.5% 10.6% 10.6% 10.8%11.7%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
All Undergraduates
10.7%
8.8%10.4% 10.3% 9.8%
10.9% 10.5% 10.6% 10.8%
13.1%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
New Undergraduates
12% 11%10%
15%
8%
15%
12%
20%
9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy
N=324
N=229
N=358
N=2,065
N=181
N=<5
• In 2020, the College of Letters and Science has the largest number of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled.
• The School of Nursing has the largest percentage of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled, with 20 percent of Nursing students identifying as targeted minorities.
Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College: Undergraduates
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
N=3,714
N=331
N=222
Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at Major Public Research Institutions, Fall 2018
Average Percent Minority for Major Public Research Institutions: 37%
1 Major Public Research Institution has a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.
5 Major Public Research Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.
Peer Enrollments by Minority Status
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2018
80%
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
N= 4,304 N= 5,276 N= 4,311 N= 4,059
N= 6,775 N= 8,266 N= 8,401 N= 9,809 N= 7,073
N= 4,420 N= 7,474 N= 4,619 N= 7,584 N= 6,216
N= 8,985 N= 5,737
N= 6,127 N= 5,359 N= 7,064
N= 20,261 N= 6,030 N= 13,349 N= 14,321 N= 14,149 N= 13,073
N= 13,913 N= 8,363
N= 18,402 N= 21,696 N= 12,575
N= 17,731 N= 17,940 N= 18,781 N= 10,690 N= 18,347
N= 20,345
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Iowa StateWisconsin
IowaMissouri
PurduePenn State
Michigan StateOhio State
IndianaKansas
MinnesotaPittsburgh
ColoradoUtah
MichiganOregon
North CarolinaVirginia
SUNY-BuffaloTexas A&M
Georgia TechIllinoisFlorida
ArizonaMaryland
WashingtonSUNY-Stony Brook
RutgersUT-Austin
UC-Santa BarbaraUC-Davis
UC-BerkeleyUCLA
UC-Santa CruzUC-San Diego
UC-Irvine
Percent Enrollment of Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
From 2011 to 2020: § 2.2 percentage
point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment
§ International students make up 29.6% of graduate enrollment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Targeted Minority Students, 10.5%
Minority Students, 15.8%
International Students, 29.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
From 2011 to 2020: § Enrollments of
targeted minority students ranged from a low of 7.8% (2013) and a high of 13.5% (2020)
§ International students make up 2.0% of clinical doctoral student enrollment
Percent Enrollment of Minority Clinical Doctorate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Targeted Minority
Students, 13.5%
Minority Students, 21.6%
International Students, 2.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients (Undergraduates)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• 14.4% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.
• 17.2% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
16.0 15.8 14.6 14.513.2 12.3
14.4 14.0 13.9 14.4
0
5
10
15
20
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
16.514.8 14.8
13.5 12.9 12.0
15.2 14.3 15.017.2
0
5
10
15
20
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Percent of Undergraduates who were Pell Recipients at AAU Public Institutions, 2018-19
Average percent Pell recipients for AAU public institutions: 24%
2 Major Public Research Institutions have a lower percent of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.
5 Major Public Research Institutions have a lower number of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.
Peer Enrollments of Pell Grant Recipients
Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2018-19http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
50%
Pell Grants are federally funded grants for students with high financial need. This indicator is a proxy for low income student enrollments.
N= 2,248 N= 2,242 N= 4,584 N= 2,968 N= 5,085 N= 4,828 N= 5,200 N= 5,626 N= 6,360 N= 6,261 N= 4,871 N= 6,212 N= 9,608 N= 4,170 N= 4,650 N= 6,647 N= 8,747 N= 11,572 N= 17,772 N= 9,212 N= 7,884 N= 4,434
N= 9,175 N= 4,890 N= 6,360 N= 8,231
N= 10,488 N= 9,863
N= 10,067 N= 7,177
N= 6,212 6,205 N= 8,242 N= 11,262 N= 11,061
N= 11,890
0 10 20 30 40 50
VirginiaGeorgia Tech
WisconsinPittsburgh
PurdueColoradoMichiganMaryland
MinnesotaIndiana
IowaIowa StateOhio State
KansasMissouri
WashingtonMichigan State
Texas A&MPenn StateUT-Austin
IllinoisNorth Carolina
FloridaOregon
UtahUC-Berkeley
RutgersArizona
UCLASUNY-Buffalo
SUNY-Stony BrookUC-Santa Cruz
UC-Santa BarbaraUC-Davis
UC-San DiegoUC-Irvine
• Data on first-generation status is collected at the time of application.
• Question first asked in 2005, in 2016 international students first asked.
• 18.0% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are first-generation students.
Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students (Undergraduates)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmAll Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
In 2018 there is an unexplained sharp increase in the number and percentage of applicants reporting that neither of their parents has a four-year college degree. It is not clear how much of the increase is due to a real change in the demographic profile of applicants and how much is due to other factors which may have contributed to a different interpretation of the question on the application for admission.
21.8 20.8 20.2 19.4 18.4 18.4 18.0 19.4 19.4 19.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
21.918.9 20.1 18.5 17.4 18.1 18.7
24.1
18.2 18.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Women as a Percentage of Total Enrollment,by School/College
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Fall 2020• Nursing has the highest percent of women enrolled (86%) and Engineering has the
lowest percent (26%)
52%
62%
41%
53%
75%
26%
74%
65%
52% 50%57%
86%
62%
78%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Total CALS Business DCS Education Engineering SoHE Nelson Inst. L&S Law SMPH Nursing Pharmac VetMed
K-12 Enrollment Projections
Wisconsin’s public school enrollments can impact the pipeline to enrollment at UW-Madison and our ability to enroll a diverse group of Wisconsin resident students. High School enrollment is projected to increase and then decline.Projections by race/ethnicity show that:
– Increases in Latino/a and Asian students.– Some declining enrollment of African American and
Native American students.– Decreases in non-Hispanic White students.
Enrollment projections by geographic locale:– Suburban public school district enrollment will be
stable– Urban, Rural, and Town district enrollment will
decline.
Source: “Projecting Public School Enrollment in Wisconsin, 2019”, Applied Population Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison http://apl.wisc.edu
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
In-State Pipeline: Minority
•26% of Wisconsin High School graduates who took the ACT are minority students(2017-18)
•16% of UW-Madison in-state applicants are minority students (2018)
•17% of in-state New Freshmen are minority students (2018)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Non-Minority,
74%
Non-Minority,
84%
Non-Minority,
84%
Non-Minority,
83%
Minority, 26%
Minority, 16%
Minority, 16%
Minority, 17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
High SchoolGraduates whoTook the ACT
Applicants Admitted Enrolled
Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,New Freshmen, Fall 2020
•Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Total Applicants
% Admitted
% Enrolled/ Yield Rate
Overall 45,941 57.2 27.8
Male 23,046 54.7 27.5Female 22,895 59.8 28.0
Resident 8,156 73.1 63.8Domestic Non-Res. 25,085 58.0 15.5
International 9,023 43.3 13.9
Targeted Minorities 5,948 60.0 27.7Total Minority 11,366 62.3 23.9
First Generation 7,927 49.0 31.4
Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,Transfer Students, Fall 2020
•Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Total Applicants
% Admitted
% Enrolled/ Yield Rate
Overall 3,525 51.9 55.2
Male 1,927 50.0 55.5Female 1,598 54.3 54.9
Resident 1,379 61.2 80.0Domestic Non-Res. 938 39.4 28.8
International 1,071 51.6 34.4
Targeted Minorities 433 40.4 60.0Total Minority 642 43.0 59.4
First Generation 980 47.2 59.8
Diversity Programs
Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented populations on campus and are centrally coordinated.• Programs with a Pre-College Component
– PEOPLE– POSSE
• Student Support Programs– Center for Educational Opportunity (CEO, formerly TRIO)– Academic Advancement Program– CAE (Center for Academic Excellence)
• Scholarship Programs– Chancellor’s Scholars– Powers/Knapp– First Wave
Academic Support Communitieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Fall 2020 Undergraduate Participation in Academic Support Communities
*Targeted Minorities include Black/African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Academic Support Community
Total Participants
Targeted Minority* Male Wisconsin
ResidentFirst
GenerationPell Grant
Eligible
Center for EducationalOpportunity (CEO) 509 61% 29% 76% 89% 72%
PEOPLE 411 84% 36% 99% 71% 64%
Posse 179 87% 45% 0% 54% 47%
First Wave 35 80% 34% 17% 26% 54%
Chancellor’s Scholar Program 301 90% 40% 55% 30% 25%
Powers/KnappProgram 241 91% 39% 58% 40% 29%
Center for AcademicExcellence (CAE) 276 83% 28% 75% 80% 76%
All Undergraduates 31,651 12% 48% 56% 19% 14%
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Retention and Graduation
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
7 percentage pointGraduation Rate gap
No First-Year Retention Rate gap
All Students: 95.2%
All Students: 88.5%
Targeted Minority Students: 81.5%
Targeted Minority Students: 95.9%
Closing the Achievement Gap in Graduation Rates at UW-Madison(percent graduated within 6 years)
Closing the Achievement Gap in Retention Rates at UW-Madison(percent retained to the second year)
See https://apir.wisc.edu/students/retention-graduation/ for detailed comparisons.
70
80
90
10020
00
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Perc
ent R
etai
ned
Year of Cohort Entrance
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Perc
ent G
radu
ated
Year of Cohort Entrance
Graduation Rate Difference, UW-Madison Compared to Other Major Public Research Universities
Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates. This represents the newest peer data available.
• Underrepresented minority students at major research universities graduated on average at rates 9 percentage points lower than all students at major research universities (based on data for 2012 entrance cohorts, measured in Fall 2018).
• In the same year, UW-Madison underrepresented minority students graduated at rates 4.3 points lower than all students.
•For the most recent year (measured in Fall 2020), UW-Madison’s gap is 7 percentage points for targeted minority students (81.6% graduation rate)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
19.4%15.6%
14.9%12.2%
11.2%10.7%10.7%10.6%10.9%
10.4%10.0%
9.7%9.6%9.6%
9.3%9.0%8.9%
8.4%8.4%
7.5%6.9%
6.3%5.7%
4.7%4.3%4.2%
3.8%3.7%
3.0%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
Fall 2012 Gaps in 6-Year Graduation Rates
• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four inquiry-based high-impact practices and includes:– Substantial research experiences that
generate knowledge and analytical skills
– Global and cultural competencies and engagement
– Leadership and activism opportunities– Application of knowledge in the “real
world”
• In 2017-18, 91% of bachelor’s degree recipients participated in at least one Wisconsin Experience Program
• Targeted minority graduates were slightly more likely to have completed at least one Wisconsin Experience activity.
Wisconsin Experience
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
91%95%
0102030405060708090
100
Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin
Experience ActivityAll Targeted Minority
Graduates
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2020: Selected Results
Percent of students who often or very often had discussions with people :http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students/nsse/ for more information
58
70
73
68
63
75
77
71
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
… with political views other than their own
… with religious beliefs diferent than their own
… from an economic background other than their own
… of a race or ethnicity other than their own
First-Year Students Seniors
NSSE 2020: Selected results
Percent of students who often or very often have:http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students/nsse/ for more information
73
55
73
57
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Tried to better understand someone else'sviews by imagining how an issue looks from
his or her perspective
Included diverse perspectives (political,religious, racial/ethnic, gender, etc.) in
course discussions or assignments
First-Year Students Seniors
NSSE 2020: Selected results
Percent of Seniors who felt quite a bit or very much:http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students/nsse/ for more information
62
46
60
58
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
… that their experience at this institution contributed to their knowledge, skills, and personal
development in understanding people of other backgrounds (economic, racial/ethnic, political,
religious, nationality, etc.)
… that their institution emphasizes encouraging contact among students from different
backgrounds (social, racial/ethnic, religious, etc.)
First-Year Students Seniors
2020 data available in December 2020
Women as a Percentage of all Facultyhttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• In Fall 2019 37.4% of Faculty were women.
•30.7% of Full Professors, 45.5% of Associate Professors, and 46.7% of Assistant Professors were women.
30% 30% 31% 31% 32% 33% 36%35%34%34%33%
31% 31% 32% 33% 33% 34%34% 35% 36%
37%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Num
ber o
f Fac
ulty
Men Women
37%
53%49%
60%
50%53%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Faculty LimitedAppointments
Instructional Staff Academic Staff University Staff Overall
Perc
enta
ge o
f Wom
en F
acul
ty
2009 2014 2019
Women as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff in Last 10 Years
2020 data available in December 2020
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
•Women make up just over 51% of all employees at UW-Madison.•A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (37%)
Peer Comparisons
for Faculty Diversity
Women Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2018
Source: IPEDS Fall HR 2018
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Average percent women faculty for AAU public institutions: 34.1%
UW-Madison: 37.4%
29 AAU public institutions have a lower number of women tenure/tenure track faculty.
50%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Georgia Tech (196)UC-San Diego (396)
Texas A&M (604)Purdue (510)Virginia (442)
Stony Brook (306)Florida (641)
Iowa State (404)Buffalo (352)
UC-Berkeley (445)Pittsburgh (529)
Iowa (444)Maryland (462)
UCLA (580)Texas (647)
Illinois (608)Indiana (472)Kansas (419)
Missouri (336)Michigan (974)
Penn State (641)Colorado (422)
Arizona (548)Minnesota (776)Wisconsin (693)
Michigan State (683)Rutgers (619)
UC-Davis (596)UC-Santa Barbara (322)
Ohio State (929)UC-Irvine (487)
North Carol ina (511)Oregon (313)
Washington (1151)Institution (Number of Women faculty)
Employee Race/Ethnicity Data
Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.
Employees may choose any of the following designations, and may select two or more races beginning in 2010:
• White• Black or African American• Asian or Asian American• American Indian or Alaska Native• Hispanic/ Latino/a• Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
Individuals with a temporary visa status are included in the racial/ethnic category counts
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Faculty Recruitment
22.1% of all faculty identify in minority groups 8.1% of faculty identify as non-AsianIn 2019 over 40% of new hires were minority faculty members
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
22%
8%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Total Minority Faculty and New Hire by Year
Asian
More then oneraceNative Hawaiian /Pacific IslanderAmerican Indian
Black / AfricanAmericanHispanic (allraces)
18% 18% 18% 19% 19% 20% 21% 21% 22%23%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Num
ber o
f U
nder
repr
esen
ted
Facu
ltyMinority Faculty Representation
23% of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities4.2 percentage point increase in minority faculty since 2010
Fall 2020 data available in December 2020, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Asian, 14.3%
Two or more races, 1.3%
Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander, 0.1%
Native American, 0.4%
Black/ African American, 2.8%
Hispanic, 4.2%
White, 77.0%
Minorities as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff in Last 10 Years
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• The percentage of minorities has increased in all job categoriesFall 2020 data available in December 2020, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
23%
15%
14%
15%
19%
17%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Faculty LimitedAppointments
Instructional Staff Academic Staff University Staff Overall
Perc
enta
ge o
f Min
ority
Fac
ulty
2009 2014 2019
Peer Comparisons
for Faculty Diversity
Minority Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2018
Source: IPEDS Fall HR 2018
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Average percent minority faculty for AAU public institutions: 23.7%
UW-Madison: 20%
20 AAU public institutions have a lower number of minority tenure/tenure track faculty.
40%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Georgia Tech (143)Oregon (148)Virginia (273)Rutgers (324)
Colorado (234)Wisconsin (389)
UC-Santa Barbara (176)Minnesota (454)
Iowa (279)Penn State (387)
North Carol ina (284)Arizona (343)
Stony Brook (220)Washington (671)
Texas (442)Indiana (325)Kansas (289)
UC-Berkeley (326)Ohio State (591)
Buffalo (264)UC-Davis (397)
Florida (510)Michigan State (469)
Iowa State (316)Pittsburgh (404)
Missouri (245)Michigan (722)
UC-San Diego (374)Maryland (379)
Purdue (474)UC-Irvine (369)
Texas A&M (596)Illinois (529)UCLA (535)
Percent Non-Asian Minority Percent All Minority
Institution (Number of Minority faculty)
Faculty Tenure Data
• Faculty who did not receive tenure include:– Those who were denied
tenure– Those who left the
university for another position elsewhere
– A few faculty members still hold probationary appointments after 9 years.
• Tenure and promotion rates are calculated at 7 and 9 years after hire, to account for those who have extensions on the tenure clock.
• Data combine hires from 2003-04 to 2012-13. This is necessary to account for small numbers of hires.
• Small Ns make tenure rates subject to large variation.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Notes about faculty tenure data:
Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender and Race / Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Average percent tenured based on data for hires from 2003-04 to 2012-13
53%
42%
76%72%
0
20
40
60
80
100
03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13
Minority Non-Minority
0
20
40
60
80
100
03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13
Women Men
Perc
ent P
rom
oted
to Te
nure
10-year average rates
Women: 70.3%
Men: 73.2%
Underrepresentedrace/ethnicity: 65.9%
White/Unknown: 74%
Promotion to Tenure
• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Sciences division.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is in the Arts and Humanities division.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
81%N=12577%
N=6876%
N=133
78%N=34
79%N=57
80%N=69
63%N=90 56%
N=78
Data on faculty hires from 2003-04 to 2012-2013
79% 79%
71%
63%69%
78% 79%
64%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts & Humanities Social Sciences
Percent Promoted to Tenure Within 7 Years
Women Men
Promotion to Tenure
• A lower percentage of faculty members are promoted to tenure within the Social Sciences division.
• The largest gaps in tenure rates by minority status are within the Social Sciences division
Data on faculty hires from 2003-04 to 2012-13
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
78%N=116
77%N=56
78%N=144
82%N=42
83%N=91
68%N=34 64%
N=128 58%N=38
70%77% 75%
53%
76%81%
75%
68%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Biological Sciences Physical Sciences Arts & Humanities Social Sciences
Percent Promoted to Tenure within 7 YearsMinority Non-Minority
Diversity Update 2020
• Slideshow available at http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity/diversity-forum/
• Questions about these slides:– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])