Diversity Update 2015 November 2015 .

Diversity Update 2015

November 2015

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity-forum.htm




This section includes information on:• Demographic variables and how they are

collected and reported

Demographic Variables and Reporting

Equity in Educational Outcomes

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

Demographic Variables for Analysis

This presentation is limited to variables for which we have quantitative information, including: Race/ethnicity Income level First-generation in college Gender Geographic diversity Information is not systematically available for all groupsthat are important to inclusive excellence.


Race/Ethnic Categories: Students

Continued terminology from Plan 2008

Includes all Asians, useful for national peer comparisons.

• Targeted Minorities include:» African American» Native American» Hispanic/Latino/a» Southeast Asian

(Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong)

• Minorities include:» Targeted Minority

categories» Other Asians» Native Hawaiians

Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application.http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with state/federal guidelines.

Race/Ethnicity Reportinghttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

Reporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity InformationIn 2010, the federal government (through the Department of Education) implemented national standards for the collection and reporting of race/ethnicity data for university students and staff. This collection allows for the reporting of multiple race/ethnic identities in a way that was not possible prior to 2010. The way race/ethnic data are collected and reported varies from the legacy methodology used prior to 2010. The major differences between three main data reporting options are explained below.Subsequent slides in this presentation use the National Standard reporting methodology.

Reporting Feature National Standard Count All Legacy

Results in single count of students P P

Prioritizes Hispanic/Latina(a) over all other values P

Reports categories that are not reported by students themselves P

Reports race/ethnic values only for domestic (non international) students P P P

Reports ALL students who indicate a particularrace/ethnicity P

Prioritizes some race/ethnicities over others in reporting P P

Used in data reporting and peer comparisons P

This section includes information on:• Enrollment

– Undergraduate– Graduate– Professional– School/College– Peer comparisons

Includes breakouts by race/ethnicity, gender, geography

Enrollment



From 2006 to 2015 3.6 percentage

point increase in Minority Enrollment

2.2 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment

Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of MinorityUndergraduate Students

Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority/minority calculations.


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

RevisedRace/Ethnic Categories

Southeast Asian Collection BeginsRace/Ethnicity Collection Begins

Minority Students, 15.6%

Targeted Minority Students, 10.2%

African American,

2.1%

Hispanic, 4.8%

American Indian, 0.2%

Asian, 5.5%

Native Hawaiian,

0.1%

2 or more races, 3.0%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% o

f Tot

al U

nder

grad

uate

sIndicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity

Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.


From 2006 to 2015: 2.2 percentage

point increase in undergraduate

targeted minority enrollment

International Students: 7.9% of

Undergraduate Enrollment

In 2008 reporting categories for race/ethnicity changed.

Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduates


• 10.2% of all undergraduates are targeted minorities.

• 9.8% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are targeted minorities.

All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

2

4

6

8

10

12

8.8 9.3 8.910.2

9.110.7

8.810.4 10.3 9.8

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

2

4

6

8

10

12

8 8.6 9 9.6 9.5 9.9 9.9 10.1 10.3 10.2

• In 2014, the College of Letters and Science has the largest number of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled.

• The School of Human Ecology has the largest percentage of undergraduate targeted minority students enrolled, with 17 percent of SoHE students identifying as targeted minorities.



Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College: Undergraduates, Fall 2015

10% 10%

7%

12%

8%

17%

11%

14%

9%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy

% o

f Und

ergr

adua

te E

nrol

lmen

t

N=3,013 N=368

N=189

N=184

N=375

N=158

N=1,611

N=124

N=<5

Iowa State

Iowa State

Indiana

Michigan State

Ohio State

Minnesota

Colorado

Michigan

Buffalo

Texas A&M

Georgia Tech

Arizona

Maryland

UT-Austin

UC-Santa Barbara

UCLA

UC-San Diego

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2013

Average Percent Minority for AAU Public Institutions: 32%

3 AAU Public Institutions have a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.

8 AAU Public Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.

Peer Enrollments by Minority Status


Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2013

80%N=16,904

N=14,854N=16,074

N=16,431N=14,343

N= 10,297N=16,568

N=18,891N=6,862

N=10,788N=11,737

N=12,260N=12,447

N=4,965

N=10,253N=13,459N=5,278

N=5,646N=4,453

N=6,769

N=4,578N=5,322

N=3,643N=6,459N=3,439N=7,863

N=7,065N=6,510N=4,465

N=5,687N=4,663N=3,113

N=4,292N=3,252

Undergraduate Enrollment Comparisons


• UW-Madison enrolled 2,990 underrepresented minority undergraduates (Fall 2013)

• There are 2,837 institutions in the United States that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 802 (28%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority undergraduates enrolled

• There are 63 institutions in Wisconsin that grant bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 15 (24%) have more total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted minority students enrolled

UW-Madison educates relatively large numbers of minority students

African American,

2.4%

Hispanic, 4.9%


Asian, 3.6%

Native Hawaiian,

0.0%


0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% o

f Tot

al U

nder

grad

uate

s

Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity


From 2006 to 2015: 2.8 percentage

point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment

International students make up 29.1% of graduate enrollment

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmIn 2008 reporting categories for race/ethnicity changed.

African American,

2.9%

Hispanic, 3.1%


Asian, 7.5%

Native Hawaiian,

0.0%


0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% o

f Tot

al U

nder

grad

uate

s

From 2006 to 2015: Enrollments of

targeted minority students ranged from a low of 7.8% (2013) and a high of 11.4% (2008)

International students make up 2.7% of clinical doctoral student enrollment

Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Minority Clinical Doctorate Students, by Race/Ethnicity


http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmIn 2008 reporting categories for race/ethnicity changed.

9% 9%

4%

18%

8%

15%

6%

7%

13%

9%

13%

7% 7%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Total CALS Business Educ. Eng. SoHE Nelson L&S Law SMPH Nursing Pharm Vet Med

% o

f Tot

al G

rad/

Prof

Col

lege

Enr

ollm

ent

N=1,045N=76

N=27

N=201

N=111

N=11

N=8

N=308

N=82

N=132

N=19

N=42 N=27

Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College:Graduate/Professional Programs, Fall 2015



Fall 2015• The School of

Education has the largest

percentage of targeted minority graduate students

(18%).

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201502468

1012141618

11.5 12.2 11.7

14.717.0 16.0 15.8

14.6 14.513.2

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201502468

1012141618

11.4 11.7 11.1

14.116 16.5

14.8 14.813.5 12.9

Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients (Undergraduates)


• 13.2% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.

• 12.9% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.

All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

VirginiaWisconsin

MichiganColorado

PittsburghPenn State

Georgia TechIndiana

IowaMaryland

IllinoisPurdue

North CarolinaOhio State

Texas A&MKansas

MinnesotaMissouri

Iowa StateMichigan State

WashingtonOregon

UT-AustinBuffaloRutgers

UC-BerkeleyFlorida

ArizonaStony Brook

UCLAUC-DavisUC-Irvine

UC-San Diego

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50N = 1,906

N = 4,547N = 4,392N = 4,467N = 3,144N = 6,931N = 2,807N = 6,270N = 4,193N = 5,062N = 6,519N = 6,438N = 3,799N = 9,576N = 9,084N = 4,248N = 7,478N = 5,823N = 5,782N = 8,916N = 7,411N = 5,379N = 10,719N = 5,579

N = 9,810N = 8,344N = 10,512N = 10,306

N = 5,566N = 10,127

N = 11,029N = 9,597N = 9,691Percent of Undergraduates

who were Pell Recipients at AAU Public Institutions, 2012-13

Average percent Pell recipients for AAU public institutions: 25%

1 AAU public institutions have a lower or equal percent of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.

8 AAU public institutions have a lower number of Pell recipients than UW-Madison.

Peer Enrollments of Pell Grant Recipients

Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2012-13http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

50%

Pell Grants are federally funded grants for students with high financial need. This indicator is a proxy for low income student enrollments.

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

5

10

15

20

2523 23.4 22.9 23.1

21.4 21.918.9 20.1

18.5 17.4

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

5

10

15

20

25

13.3

17.620.8

22.3 22.1 21.8 20.8 20.2 19.4 18.4• Data on first-

generation status is collected at the time of application.

• Question first asked in 2005.

• 17.4% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are first-generation students.

Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students (Undergraduates)

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmAll Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

Accumulating Data

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201542%

44%

46%

48%

50%

52%

54%

50.9%

49.1%

Indicator 7: Percent UndergraduateEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2015


Women

Men

Women havecomprised morethan half ofundergraduateenrollment since1996.

Women as a Percentage of Total Undergraduate Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2015


Fall 2015• Nursing has the

highest percent of women

undergraduates enrolled (87%)

and Engineering has the lowest percent (23%)

Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing Pharmacy0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

51%

62%

43%

77%

23%

82%

52%

87%

57%

Women comprised more

than half ofgraduate/

professionalenrollment from

2004-2012 and in 2015.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201442%

44%

46%

48%

50%

52%

54%

56%

50.3%

49.7%

Indicator 8: Percent Graduate/ProfessionalEnrollment by Gender, Fall 2015


Women

Men

Women as a Percentage of Total Grad/Professional Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2015


Fall 2015• Nursing has the highest percent of

women enrolled in a graduate or

professional program, while

Engineering has the lowest percent of women enrolled

in a graduate or professional

program.

Total CALS Business Educ. Eng. SoHE Nelson L&S Law SMPH Nursing Pharm Vet Med0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

50% 51%

38%

67%

21%

82%

60%

51% 49%54%

87%

56%

74%

Enrollments by WI CountyHome County of UW-Madison Undergraduate Students (Wisconsin Residents)


Among the 72 Wisconsin counties, each is represented by at least 3 undergraduate students in Fall 2015.

Red: More than 4% of resident undergraduates from countyBlack: Between 2% and 4% of resident undergraduates from countyLight Gray: Less than 2% (but at least three students) of resident undergraduates from county

This section includes information on:• Undergraduate Pipeline and Access• Diversity Programs

Undergraduate Access and Pipeline



Undergraduate Enrollment Pipeline

The population in high school serves as a major pool for UW-Madison undergraduates• We can estimate the pipeline for several groups

– Minority Students– Low-Income (Pell or Free/Reduced Lunch)– First-Generation Students– Rural students

Pipelinehttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

UW-Madison Enrolled

UW-Madison Admits

UW-Madison Applicants

Population 13-17"Potential"* First

Generation Students

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total

Wisconsin's First-Generation College-Going Recruiting Pool

(291,312 of 386,920)

(1,862 of 7,564)

(1,287 of 5,860)

(902 of 3,843)

No data available on graduation rates or academic achievement by parental education levels within Wisconsin

Pipeline: First Generation

*“Potential” First Generation Students does not imply any level of academic achievement, school enrollment, or preparedness. This estimate reflects the population 13-17 with no parent/guardian in the household with a Bachelor’s Degree. Sources: Overall WI Population (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 Estimates), Potential First Generation Students (“Parental Education and College Participation Rates in Wisconsin”, Sara Lazenby, August 2009), 2010 US Census Data, Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls for 2013-14 School Year

An estimated 75% of 13-17 year old Wisconsin residents live in households where no parent/guardian holds a bachelor’s degree.

Approximately 24% of UW-Madison Resident New Freshman are first-generation students.

We do not have a reliable data source on high school graduation or college preparedness by parental education levels for Wisconsin residents.



Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool

(92,142 of 261,179)

(15,484 of 60,454)

No Data Available on Low-Income Status of UW-Madison Applicants or Admits

(668 of 3,837)

Economically Disadvantaged High School Public School Students

Economically Disadvantaged Public High School Graduates

UW-Madison Enrolled

Pipeline: Low Income

“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2012-13 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student GroupUW-Madison Data based on Fall 2013

• 35% of Public K-12 students in Wisconsin are Economically Disadvantaged (2012-13)

• 26% of Public High School Graduates are Economically Disadvantaged (2012)

• We have no reliable information on income of applicant students, all data based on financial aid applications

• 17% of Resident New Freshmen are Pell Grant Recipients


UW-Madison Enrolled

UW-Madison Admits

UW-Madison Applicants

"Well-Prepared" Minority Public High

School Graduates

Minority Public High School Graduates

Minority Public High School Students


Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool

(290,550 of 385,907)

(1,303 of 7,564)

(879 of 5,860)

(601 of 3,837)

(693 of 12,695)

(11,546 of 60,454)

(57,874 of 261,179)

Pipeline: Minority

• 22% of Public High School students in Wisconsin are minority students(2012-13)

• 19% of Public High School Graduates are minority students (2012)

• 16% of Resident New Freshmen are minority students (2013)


“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT score). The ACT is only one of many academic factors considered in the admissions process.

Pipeline: Rural

• While over half (51%) of WI high schools are considered rural, only 30% of 12th graders attend a rural high school.

• Rural high school students apply at lower rates than other students

• Once they apply, rural students are admitted and enroll at rates proportional to their application rate.

Source: UW-Madison New Freshman Enrollment Pipeline Wisconsin Public High School Classes of 2012-2014 http://apir.wisc.edu/pipelineviz.htm


City,23%

City,21%

City,19%

City,19%

Suburb,25%

Suburb,38%

Suburb,39%

Suburb,38%

Town,22%

Town,18%

Town,19%

Town,20%

Rural,30%

Rural,22%

Rural,23%

Rural,23%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Graduates Applicants Admitted Enrolled

K-12 Enrollment Projections

Wisconsin’s public school enrollments can impact the pipeline to enrollment at UW-Madison and our ability to enroll a diverse group of Wisconsin resident students.

Enrollment projections by geographic locale:– Suburban public school district enrollment will

increase– Urban district enrollment will decline then grow– Rural district enrollment will decline.

Projections by race/ethnicity show that:– Increases in Hispanic and Asian students.– Steady enrollments of African American and Native

American students.– Decreases in non-Hispanic White students.

Source: “Projecting Public School Enrollment in Wisconsin”, Applied Population Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison http://apl.wisc.edu


Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,New Freshmen, Fall 2015

• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.


Total Applicants

% Admitted

% Enrolled/ Yield Rate

Overall 32780 49.2 38.9

Male 16,417 45.4 40.7Female 16,363 52.9 37.4

Resident 8,452 67.1 63.8Domestic Non-Res. 15,277 45.3 22.3

International 5,702 36.0 24.3

Targeted Minorities 4,070 40.3 38.4Total Minority 6,941 45.1 32.2

First Generation 4,724 42.8 47.8

Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls, Transfer Students, Fall 2015

• Wisconsin residents are the most likely applicants to be admitted and are most likely to enroll compared to other groups.


Total Applicants

% Admitted

% Enrolled/ Yield Rate

Overall 4,620 46.5 59.1

Male 2,426 43.7 61.6Female 2,194 49.7 56.6

Resident 2,107 56.8 74.9Domestic Non-Res. 1,212 35.1 33.2

International 1,048 38.9 43.9

Targeted Minorities 570 37.5 50.0Total Minority 801 40.4 51.2

First Generation 1,269 42.0 64.2

Diversity Programs

Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented populations on campus and are centrally coordinated.• Programs with a Pre-College Component

– PEOPLE– POSSE

• Student Support Programs– Center for Educational Opportunity (CEO, formerly TRIO)– Academic Advancement Program– CAE (Center for Academic Excellence)

• Scholarship Programs– Chancellor’s Scholars– Powers/Knapp– First Wave

Academic Support Communitieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

Fall 2015 Undergraduate Participation in Academic Support Communities

*Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.

Academic Support Community

Total Participants

Targeted Minority* Male Wisconsin

ResidentFirst

GenerationPell Grant

Eligible

Center for EducationalOpportunity (CEO) 374 72% 31% 77% 92% 78%

PEOPLE 330 91% 46% 96% 59% 64%

Posse 179 85% 51% 0% 61% 56%

First Wave 48 69% 48% 21% 31% 52%

Chancellor’s Scholar Program 270 96% 42% 60% 28% 27%

Powers/KnappProgram 160 95% 32% 86% 39% 36%

Center for Academic Excellence (CAE) 96 70% 35% 68% 73% 50%

All Undergraduates 29,580 10% 49% 62% 18% 13%


This section includes information on progress to degree measures including

• Retention and graduation rates• Time to degree • Peer comparisons

Undergraduate Progress to Degreehttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201440

50

60

70

80

90

100

Year of Cohort Entrance

Perc

ent

Gra

duat

ed

Retention and Graduation


10.5 percentage pointGraduation Rate gap

0.6 percentagepoint First-YearRetention Rate gap

All Students: 95.8%

All Students: 85.1%

Targeted Minority Students: 74.6%

Targeted Minority Students: 95.2%

Closing the Achievement Gap in Graduation Rates at UW-Madison(percent graduated within 6 years)

Closing the Achievement Gap in Retention Rates at UW-Madison (percent retained to the second year)

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 201470

80

90

100

Targeted Minority Students all Students

Year of Cohort Entrance

Perc

ent

Reta

ined

Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group



1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation

Rate % Difference

All New Freshmen 95.8 - 85.1 -Women 96.1 +0.3 87.3 +2.2

Men 95.5 -0.3 82.6 -2.4Targeted Minority 95.2 -0.6 74.6 -10.5African American 97.0 +1.2 74.2 -10.9

Native American/American Indian 100.0 +4.2 55.6 -29.5Hispanic/Latino/a 94.5 -1.3 80.1 -5.0

South East Asian 96.8 +1.0 68.9 -16.2Non-Targeted Asian 97.7 +1.9 86.9 +1.8

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 100.0 +4.2 100.0 +14.9Two or More Races 93.9 -1.9 76.1 -9

International 96.3 +0.5 79.6 -5.5Wisconsin Residents 95.7 -0.1 85.8 +0.7

Non-Residents 96.0 +0.2 82.7 -2.4Minnesota Reciprocity 96.0 +0.2 86.6 +1.5

First-Generation College Students 93.2 -2.6 78.6 -6.5Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 94.8 -1.0 76.4 -8.7

FIGs 96.3 +0.5 81.6 -3.5Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2014 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2009 Cohort





1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation

Rate % Difference

All New Freshmen 95.8 - 85.1 -Targeted Minority 95.2 -0.6 74.6 -10.5

PEOPLE 94.6 -1.2 62.5 -22.6POSSE 100.0 +4.2 89.7 +4.6

Chancellor's Scholars 100.0 +4.2 81.8 +3.3Powers/Knapp Scholars 98.3 +4.7 90.6 +5.5

First Wave 100.0 +4.2 80.0 -5.1CEO* 92.1

Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2014 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2009 Cohort

*Graduation Rates not yet available for CEO.

Graduation Rate Difference, UW-Madison Compared to Other Major Public Research Universities

Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates.

• Underrepresented minority students graduated on average at rates 7 percentage points lower than all students at major research universities (based on data for 2008 entrance

cohorts, collected in 2015).

• In the same year, UW-Madison underrepresented minority students graduated at rates 11 points lower than all students.


0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%

Six-Year Graduation Rate Gap at Selected AAU Institutions

Weighted Average

UW-Madison

This section includes information on • Participation in the Wisconsin

Experience• Student’s perception of their

learning experience

Bachelor’s Degree Holdershttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four inquiry-based high-impact practices and includes:– Substantial research experiences that

generate knowledge and analytical skills

– Global and cultural competencies and engagement

– Leadership and activism opportunities– Application of knowledge in the “real

world”• In 2014-15, 91% of bachelor’s degree

recipients participated in at least one Wisconsin Experience Program

• Targeted minority graduates were slightly more likely to have completed at least one Wisconsin Experience activity.

Wisconsin Experience



0102030405060708090

100

91% 94%

Percent of Graduates with at Least One Wisconsin Experience Activity

All Gradu-ates

Targeted Minority Graduates



• In 2014-15 targeted minority students were slightly more likely to have completed a Wisconsin Experience activity.


Percent of Bachelor’s Degree Recipients Who Participated in a Wisconsin Experience Activity

Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing0

102030405060708090

100

91100

84

96 100 9786

10094

100

8895

10095 92

100

Non-Targeted Targeted



• Transfer-start graduates participated in Wisconsin Experience activities at lower rates (83%) than freshman-start graduates (94%).


Percent of Bachelor’s Degree Recipients Who Participated in a Wisconsin Experience Activity

Total CALS Business Education Engineering SoHE L&S Nursing0

102030405060708090

10094

100

86

98 100 9790

100

83

100

70

91100 96

73

100

Freshman-Start Transfer-Start

Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation“How able were/are you to …”(Targeted Minorities and Non-Targeted Students)

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmLearn on your ownApply skills and knowledge of your chosen major(s)

Find, organize, and evaluate information from multiple sources

Draw conclusions after weighing evidence, facts, and ideas

Develop a personal code of ethics and values

Empathize w/ind. differences based on culture, ethnicity, disability or sexual orientation

Write Effectively

Apply knowledge and skills in real world settings

Use computers and electronic technologyUnderstand that science is relevant to everyday life

Lead others effectively

Work collaboratively in groups

Speak Effectively

Understand culture and society within the United States

Contribute to the welfare of others

Understand cultures and societies outside of the United States

Appreciate the arts such as literature, music, and fine arts

Communicate in a language other than English

1

2

3

4

5

Targeted Minority Graduates Non-Targeted Graduates

Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation“How able were/are you to …”(First-Generation and Continuing Generation)

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htmLearn on your own

Apply skills and knowledge of your chosen major(s)





Write Effectively





Speak Effectively






1

2

3

4

5

First Generation Continuing Generation

Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation“How able were/are you to …”(Males and Females)


Learn on your ownApply skills and knowledge of your chosen major(s)





Write Effectively





Speak Effectively






1

2

3

4

5

Female Male

This section includes information on • Faculty and Staff by gender and by

race/ethnicity

Faculty and Staffhttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

2015 data available in December 2015

Indicator 10: Women as a Percentage of all Faculty


• In Fall 2014 33.4% of Faculty were women.

• 27.4% of Full Professors, 38.7% of Associate Professors, and 45.3% of Assistant Professors were women.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20140

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

33.4%

Num

ber o

f Fac

ulty

Perc

ent o

f Fac

ulty

Women as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff

2015 data available in December 2015


• Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.

• A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (33.4%)

Total Faculty Exec/Dir/Admin

Instructional Acad. Staff

Other Acad. Staff University Staff0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Employee Race/Ethnicity Data

Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.

Employees may choose any of the following designations, and may select two or more races as of 2009:

• White• Black• Asian• American Indian• Hispanic/ Latino/a• Hawaiian


Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment

• Increases in the percent of faculty hires that are racial/ethnic minorities.

• 2011-12 Data affected by HRS conversion, 25% of faculty hires are missing information on race/ethnicity


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Perc

ent

Year of Hire

UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status

Minority Faculty Non-Asian Minority Faculty

Madison Plan

Strategic HiresSHI - 2

Black, 2.6%

Asian/Pacific Islander, 11.9%


Hispanic, 3.5%

Two or More Races, 0.9%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty Headcount

16.8%16.9%16.2%

15.1% 15.4%

17.6% 17.8%18.5%

19.2% 19.1%

Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation

• In Fall 2014: 2,220 total faculty members

• 19.1% of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities.

• 4.0 percentage point increase in minority faculty since 2005

Fall 2015 data available in December 2015, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010


Instructional Academic Staff

• In 2014, 2,339 Instructional Academic Staff members

• 11.8% of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities

• 0.3% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 2005


2015 data available in December 2015, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

11.7%12.1%11.2%

12.0%11.5%

Black,1.3%

Asian,7.4%

American Indian,.3%

Hispanic/Latino/a,2.3%

11.8%

Two or More Races,.8%

11.7% 12.2% 11.7% 11.8%

Non-Instructional Academic Staff

• In 2014: 5,278 non-instructional Academic Staff

• 13.2% of non-instructional Academic Staff are minorities

• 2.1 percentage point increase in minority non-instructional academic staff since 2005



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

Hispanic/ Latino/a, 2.0%AmericanIndian, .4%

Asian,8.1%

Black,1.9%

12.4%12%

Two or More Races,

.8%

12%11.7%11.2%11.1%

12.6%13.3% 13.5% 13.2%

University Staff

• In 2014: 5,270 University Staff members

• 14.2% of university staff are minorities

• 3.3% percentage point increase in minority university staff since 2005



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Minority University Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

12.6%12%11.9%11.4%

10.9% Hispanic/ Latino/a, 5.1% American Indian,.3%

Asian, 4.8%

Black,3.0%

12.9%

Two or More Races, 1.0%

13.3% 13.3% 13.6% 14.2%

Executive/Director/Administrators

• In 2014: 435 Executive/Director/Administrators

• 11.5% of Executive/Director/Administrators are racial/ethnic minorities

• 0.7 percentage point increase in minority Executive/Director/Administrators since 2005.



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Minority Executive/Director/Administrators as a Percent of the Total Headcount

Hispanic/Latino/a, 3.7% American Indian, .5% Asian, 1.7%

Black,6.2%

11.1%11.6%11.2%11.2%10.8%

12.0%

Two or More Races,.2% 11.8% 12.1%11.8% 11.5%

Total Faculty Exec/Dir/Admin InstructionalAcad. Staff

Other Acad. Staff

University Staff0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type

All Employee Groups

• 14% of all employees are members of a minority group.• 19% of faculty are members of a minority group.


2015 data available in December 2015, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010. Total excludes Employees-in-Training and Graduate Assistants.

Stony BrookVirginiaOregon

WisconsinIowa

ArizonaOhio State

RutgersIndiana

MinnesotaWashington

North CarolinaPenn State

UC-Santa BarbaraKansas

MissouriColorado

UT-AustinIowa StatePittsburgh

UC-BerkeleyUC-Davis

Michigan StateFloridaBuffalo

MarylandUC-San Diego

PurdueMichigan

Texas A&MIllinoisUCLA

UC-IrvineGeorgia Tech

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Peer Comparisons

for Faculty Diversity

Non-White Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty as a Percent of Total Full-Time Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2013

Source: IPEDS Fall HR 2013


Average percent non-white faculty for AAU public institutions: 21%

UW-Madison: 18%

23 AAU public institutions have a lower number of non-white tenure/tenure track faculty.

N=263N=289N=445

N=451N=448

N=89N=197N=104

N=353N=271N=272

N=260

N=641N=372

N=264N=322N=253N=465N=414

N=304N=295N=339N=253

N=401N=229

N=223N=270N=155N=322

N=273N=268N=431

N=344N=468

35%

This section includes information on • Faculty and Tenure

Faculty and Tenurehttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

Faculty Tenure Data

• Faculty who did not receive tenure include:– Those who were denied

tenure– Those who left the

university for another position elsewhere

– A few faculty members still hold probationary appointments after 9 years.

• Tenure and promotion rates are calculated at 6 and 9 years after hire, to account for those who have extensions on the tenure clock.

• Data combine hires from 1994-95 to 2006-07 or 1999-00 to 2008-09. This is necessary to account for small numbers of hires.

• Small Ns make tenure rates subject to large variation.


Notes about faculty tenure data:

54%

73%

43%

70%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

6 Years 9 Years

Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years

Men Women

Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender

• At 9 years, 70% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1999-00 to 2008-09


50%

73%

49%

70%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

6 Years 9 Years

Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years

Non-Minority Minority

Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status

• At 9 Years, 70% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.


Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1999-00 to 2008-09

72%

81% 82%74%

58%66%

72%

81%73%

51%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Total Physical Sciences Arts andHumanities

Biological Sciences Social Studies

Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division

Men Women

N=515

N=285

N=81N=140

N=31

N=87

N=175 N=79

N=119

N=88

Promotion to Tenure

• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies.

• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division.

Data on faculty hires from 1994-95 to 2006-07


Promotion to Tenure

• A lower percentage of faculty members are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies division.

• The largest gap in tenure rates by minority status is within the Arts and Humanities.

Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2006-07


Total Physical Sciences

Arts and Humanities

Biological Sciences

Social Studies0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

65%

80%

73%67%

46%

71%

79%85%

75%

56%

Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Minority Status and Division

Minority Non-Minority

N=189

N=681

N=56 N=137

N=45

N=132

N=45

N=228

N=43

N=184

Tenure/Promotion Datahttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

• All groups have lower promotion rates within the Social Studies division.

• Women, and especially minority women, are more likely to be within the social studies division.

• For groups with small hiring pools, the effect of one person’s tenure/non-tenure can affect the percent tenured dramatically.

• Those not receiving tenure includes those who took a position elsewhere or still have a probationary appointment after 9 years.

Key findings from tenure/promotion data:

This section includes information on • Climate studies and surveys that include

climate-related questions

Climate Studies and Surveyshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

Climate Studieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

• UW-Madison participated in UW System Climate Study in 2011 (limited to CALS and Office of Student Life);

• Letters & Science Climate Study was conducted in 2009-10; with linkages to STEM, teaching and learning communities

• NSSE Survey includes many climate-related questions, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011, 2014

• WISELI Studies and Programs; on-going since 2002

Climate Studieshttp://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

UW-Madison Participation in the UW System Climate Study

• The UW System Climate Study was implemented at the request of the Board of Regents. Tier I was implemented by several UWs in 2008-09. Tier II was implemented in 2009-10. Tier III was implemented in 2010-11

• UW-Madison’s Climate Survey was fielded in February 2011; responses were anonymous and confidential

• Questionnaire went to all employees and students in CALS and Division of Student Life

• More detail: http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity-climate.htm

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2014

Selected NSSE 2014 ResultsPercent of Seniors who often or very often:


See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm

People of a race or ethnicity other than your own

People from an economic background other than your own

People with religious beliefs different than our own

People with political views other than your own

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

67

73

73

71

During the current school year, how often have you had discussions with people from the following

groups?

Percent Often or Very Often

NSSE 2014

Selected NSSE 2014 ResultsPercent of Seniors who often or very often:



Included diverse perspectives (political, re-ligious, racial/ethnic, gender, etc.) in course

discussions or assignments

Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from

his or her perspective

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

48

67

During the current school year, how often have you ...

Percent Often or Very Often

NSSE 2014

Selected NSSE 2014 ResultsPercent of Seniors who felt quite a bit or very much:



How much does your institution emphasize encouraging contact among students from different backgrounds (social, racial/ethnic, religious, etc.)

How much has your experience at this institution contributed to your knowledge skills, and personal development in understanding people of other backgrounds (economic, racial/ethnic, political, religious, nationality, etc.)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

44

56

Percent quite a bit or very much

Summary of Indicators

Indicators present in this report:1. Percent enrollment of minority undergraduate students2. Percent enrollment of targeted minority undergraduate students3. Percent enrollment of minority graduate students4. Percent enrollment of minority professional students5. Percent enrollment of Pell grant recipients6. Percent enrollment of first-generation students7. Percent enrollment of undergraduates by gender8. Percent enrollment of graduate/professional students by gender9. Retention/Graduation rates of targeted minorities, Pell grant recipients,

and first-generation students.10. Women as a percent of all Faculty11. Minority Faculty recruitment12. Minority Faculty representation13. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by gender14. Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by minority status


Diversity Update 2014

• Slideshow available at http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

• Questions about these slides:– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])


mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Diversity Update 2015 November 2015 .

Documents

Transcript of Diversity Update 2015 November 2015 .