Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division
description
Transcript of Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division
Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division
Historical PerformanceAutomated Systems
Measurement AccuracyThe Future
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Statewide We Are Almost There
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Mill
ion
s o
f T
on
s o
f W
as
te
WasteDiverted
WasteDisposed
TotalWasteGenerated
17% 21% 25% 31% 33%
42%
Figures in percent are the state-wide diversion rate.
44%
48%
37%32%28%10% 20% 24%
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Programs Implemented by Jurisdictions from 1990 to 2000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
1990 1995 2000
Year
Nu
mb
er
of
Pro
gra
ms
Composting
Education
Recycling
Source Reduction
Total Programs
Program Type
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
The Bottom Line:Yes We Are Making Progress
64 76 97 107 124
207
252258 233
252 231
61 42 32
41
87 8885
47
199
28
185918
33
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1995 (464 Total) 1996 (464 Total) 1997 (447 total) 1998 (447 total) 1999 (445 total) 2000 (445 total)
50 % + 25 - 49 % < 25 % No Rate In Progress
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Southern California Jurisdictions Biennial Review Compliance for 2000
44%
14%
0%
40%
2%
0%
Board Approved
Board Approved Good Faith Effort
Board Approved Reduced DiversionRequirement
Board Approved Time Extension
Under Compliance
Under Review
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Northern California Jurisdictions Biennial Review Compliance for 2000
53%
14%
3%
28%
1%
1%
Board Approved
Board Approved Good Faith Effort
Board Approved Reduced DiversionRequirement
Board Approved Time Extension
Under Compliance
Under Review
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Reporting Success by:State Agencies/Facilities
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2000 2001 2002
Plans Submitted
Annual Report
Annual Report
ReportsOutstanding
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Trend for Number of Planning Documents submitted in from of the Board.
Planning Documents Reviewed by the Board from 1993 to 2002
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Siting ElementSummary Plan
HouseHold Hazardous Waste ElementSource Reduction and Recycling Element
Non-Disposal Facility Element0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Num
ber
of D
ocum
ents
Year
Siting Element Summary Plan HouseHold Hazardous Waste Element Source Reduction and Recycling Element Non-Disposal Facility Element
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Future Board Actions
20032004
20052006
2007
5 Year Plan Reviews
New Base Years
Time Extensions/ADRs
Biennial Reviews
State Agency Annual Reports
Annual Report Reviews
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Year
Count of Board Actions
5 Year Plan Reviews New Base Years Time Extensions/ADRsBiennial Reviews State Agency Annual Reports Annual Report Reviews
Type of Board Actions
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
In the Beginning There Was No Automation…
Diversion rate calculations were done by hand, a painstaking process.
There was no easy way for the public to view board data
There was no model annual report. Report formats varied widely.
Board staff spent enormous amounts of time reviewing and analyzing jurisdiction reports
Jurisdictions spenta lot of time and money reporting to the CIWMB.
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Today: Automated Systemsaid DPLA & Board Customers
Computer-based tools help optimize staff and stakeholders’ time
Save time on routine filings and data entry Cut costs for complying with mandates Analyze data, project trends and workloads Allow focus of resources on diversion
program implementation Provide easy web based access to critical
decision making data
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
What Automated Systems? Electronic Annual Report (EAR) and State
Organization and Agency Recycling Database(SOARD)
Electronic SB 1066 Diversion Program Updates (E-1066)
Databases: PARIS, DRS, Waste Characterization, Jurisdiction Goal Achievement and Progress System, Document Tracking, Geographical Information Systems
Jurisdiction Waste Stream Profiles Countywide, Regionwide, Jurisdiction Progress
Report Several other on-line web reports
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
The On-lineDiversion Rate Calculator
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
State AgencyAnnual Reports Fully Automated
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Jurisdiction Annual Reports Fully Automated
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Jurisdictions Embrace New Methods
Electronic vs Paper Annual Reports
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1995 2000 2001
Year
Nu
mb
er
of
Rep
ort
s
Paper
Electronic
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
State Agencies Embrace Electronic Filing
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2000 2001 2002
PaperElectronic
Outstanding
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Time to Complete Biennial Reviews
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1995-96 1999-2000
Biennial Review Cycle
Mo
nth
s
Biennial Reviews
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
DPLA Customers Weigh InCompleting the Electronic Annual Report was easy and the instructions were clear.
Strongly Agree36%
Agree54%
Neutral8%
Disagree2%
Strongly Disagree0%
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
DPLA Saving Customers’ Time
EAR took less time than the previous paper Annual Report
Strongly Agree47%
Agree27%
Neutral24%
Disagree0%
Strongly Disagree2%
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
New Tools Help DPLA Analyze
Jurisdiction-Submitted Diversion Rate Calculation Methods2000 vs. 2001
267294
77
94101
39
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2000 2001
Perc
en
t o
f Ju
risd
icti
on
s
Adjustment Method - Default Adjustment Method - Alternate Values
Generation-based
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Web Hits 1998-2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
January April June August October
Months
# o
f H
its
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003LG Central On-line
Jurisdiction Electronic Annual Report Used
LG Central Expanded
State Agency Electronic Annual Report Used
Tools for Schools
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Improving Measurement Accuracy 1995-1996 Biennial Reviews required many
jurisdictions to do new base years 1997 Accuracy Working Group 1999 Statewide Characterization of Waste
Disposed 1999-2000 Biennial Reviews included many
new base years and allowed time extensions 2001 SB 2202 required report to Legislature
with recommendations to improve diversion rate measurement
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
BY Changed vs. Not Changed
Jurisdictions that Changed vs. Did Not Change Base Years Since 1995
Did Not Change BaseYear61%
Changed Base Year39%
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Chart shows J’s that have changed their original base year by year.
Count of Jurisdictions that have Changed Their Original Base Year by
Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Year
Nu
mb
er
of
Ju
ris
dic
tio
ns
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
New Base Year Case Study: Diversion Breakdown for Jurisdiction
25%
38%
37%
Non Residential
Business Audits
Res/ADC/Landfill Salvage
Residential
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
New Base Year Case Study: Impact of the Largest Businesses (333) Audited Relative to the Total Business Audits (approx. 7,600)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
top 10 top 20 top 30
Business Generators
% o
f Div
ersi
on to
nnag
e fr
om B
usin
esse
s A
udits
New Base Years: Maximizing Efficiency Analyzed 35 studies to assess impact of
the top 10 businesses versus all audited businesses 33 out of 35 jurisdictions derived 50%
or more of diversion from top 10 businesses 21 out of 35 jurisdictions derived 80 %
or more of diversion from top 10 businesses 13 out of 35 jurisdictions derived over
90% of diversion from top 10 businesses Recommend jurisdictions audit their
largest businesses first
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Observations of Current Base Year Efforts
Quality of submitted studies appears to be improving
Use of Certification Form has: Improved the quality of data by tying
programs to diversion tonnages Provided jurisdictions with information
on potential gaps in program efforts Served as a useful tool in program
evaluation and planning
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Broad Themes in SB 2202 Report Recommendations
Potential for error in all components of diversion rate measurement system
Diversion rates are estimates/indicators
Small jurisdictions more likely to have inaccurate diversion rate
Need to focus on diversion program implementation
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Activities to Improve DRS Accuracy
DRS regulation revisions Focused training for all participants DRS web-based training modules
being developed Continue random facility visits Publish results of random visits in
InfoCycling
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Disposal Reporting Survey Week Site AuditsCompliance Rate by Region (2000-2002)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2000 2001 2002
Year
Perc
ent o
f Fac
ilities
Ask
ing
for
Juris
dict
ion-
of-O
rigin
Info
rmat
ion
Bay Area
Southern
Coastal &Mountain
CentralValley
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
What Guides Us? Implementing Statutes and Strategic Plan Saving our customers time and money Improving our information delivery
system Enhancing our tools and accuracy Leveraging tools and technology to
“create” staff time to assist an increased number of customers
Focusing on types of materials still left in the waste stream
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
Per Capita Disposal Per Capita Disposal
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
700.0
800.0
900.0
Material
Po
un
ds
per
Yea
r
1990
1999
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
The Future• More effective process, and enhanced
tools and assistance • Streamline future Board Biennial Review
process for 2001-2002• Improve and streamline the diversion
program and new base year verification processes
• Automate new base year process (similar to EAR)
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
The Future…• Support local jurisdictions’ ability
to reach and maintain California’s waste diversion mandates.
• Work with other State agencies to promote zero-waste strategies that would ultimately put State agencies in a position to lead by example.
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
The Future… Encourage recycling activities and new technologies in all businesses and residences.
Promote new or existing technologies and processes to address existing or emerging waste streams.
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised
The Future… Improve the exchange of and
access to information internally and externally.
Through consistent and effective enforcement or other appropriate measures, ensure compliance with federal and State waste management laws and regulations.
Board Meeting Agenda Item 27
May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised