District Heating Systems Alternatives Lederer Fiedler 01-19-2012

19
OPTIMIZATION OF DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEMS STEAM VS. HOT WATER TKDA Presenters TKDA Presenters Lon Fiedler and Rusty Steitz

description

District Heating Systems Alternatives Lederer Fiedler 01-19-2012

Transcript of District Heating Systems Alternatives Lederer Fiedler 01-19-2012

  • OPTIMIZATION OF

    DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEMS

    STEAM VS. HOT WATER

    TKDA PresentersTKDA Presenters

    Lon Fiedler and Rusty Steitz

  • Optimization of District Heat Systems

    Steam vs. Hot Water

    District Heat System Brief History and

    Advantages

    Heating Medium -Steam or Hot Water

    Considerations for Converting from Considerations for Converting from

    Steam to Hot Water

    Alternative Fuels and Energy Evaluation

    Optimization of a District Hot Water

    System

  • 600

    800

    1000

    District Heating Systems in

    US

    5%

    1%2%

    0%

    District Heating Installations

    (2009)

    Colleges &

    Universities

    Community

    Utilities

    Healthcare

    Installations

    US District Heating Systems History

    0

    200

    400

    600

    1877 1909 1959 2009

    48%

    14%

    30%Installations

    Military/Gov

    Installations

    Airports

    Industrial

    Other

    Majority of Existing District Heating Systems Use Steam

  • Advantages of District Heating Systems

    Use of Combined Heat and Power (CHP)

    Efficiency: 80% CHP vs. 45% Combined Cycle

    Use of absorption chillers for cooling

    Reduced costs for users Reduced costs for users

    Can allow for greater fuels flexibility

    Hot water systems allow great flexibility in

    utilizing additional heating sources

  • Advantages: Hot Water vs. Steam

    Heating Loop First Costs

    Operation and Maintenance Costs

    Heating Medium Steam or Hot Water

    Operation and Maintenance Costs

  • Advantages: Hot Water Vs. Steam

    Steam Systems Hot Water Systems

    Open System

    Does not require condensate to

    be returned

    Applicable for use with building

    Lower heating losses (vs. Steam)

    Flexible piping materials

    Lower installation and material costs

    Lower chemical treatment costs

    (closed loop) Applicable for use with building

    hot water or steam heating

    Circulating Pumps are not

    required

    (closed loop)

    Allows for hot water storage

    Lower maintenance costs

    Increased CHP efficiency

    Easier energy metering

    Modern buildings utilize hot water

    for heating

    Allows for inclusion of lower temperature

    heat from industrial waste

    or renewable energy

  • Heating Loop Initial Costs

    HIGHER INITIAL COST ASSOCIATED

    WITH STEAM SYSTEMS

    Additional Expansion Loops

    Drip Leg Vaults

    Higher Piping Material and

    Installation Costs

    Supply and return pipes

    are both full size

    Require Circulating Water Pump

    Conversion of existing building

    HIGHER INITIAL COST ASSOCIATED

    HOT WATER SYSTEMS

    Installation Costs

    High Temp Insulation

    Additional Drip Leg Piping

    Heat Exchangers at Building

    Condensate return pumping

    system

    Conversion of existing building

    steam systems to hot water

  • Steam Vault

    Drip Leg

    Expansion Loops

  • Steam and Hot Water Pipe Systems

    Steam Pipe

    Condensate

    High Pressure Drip Leg

  • Operation and Maintenance Costs

    HIGHER O&M COSTS ASSOCIATED

    WITH STEAM SYSTEMS

    Steam Traps and Vaults

    Heat Losses

    Chemical Treatment

    Lower CHP Electrical Output

    Higher Aux Loads

    HIGHER O&M COSTS ASSOCIATED

    HOT WATER SYSTEMS

    Lower CHP Electrical Output

    Condensate Piping Wear

  • Why Convert?

    For Equivalent Pipe Lengths, Operating and

    Maintenance Costs for Steam Systems are Twice that

    of Hot Water

    Considerations for Converting from Steam to

    Hot Water

    of Hot Water

    Lower Line Losses, Increased Efficiency, and Better

    System Control Can Significantly Lower Fuel Usage in

    Boilers by 25 to 50% or in CHP Plants Potentially

    Double the Steam Turbine Efficiency

  • Considerations for Converting from Steam to

    Hot Water

    Evaluate Existing Steam System

    Evaluate Plant Efficiency Increases

    Evaluate Operational and Maintenance Cost

    SavingsSavings

    Alternative Fuels and Energy Source Evaluation

    Existing Customer Perceptions, Willingness to

    Convert, and Necessary Incentives

    Potential for New Customers

  • Effect of Loop Temperature on Steam

    Turbine Efficiency

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    S

    t

    e

    a

    m

    T

    u

    r

    b

    i

    n

    e

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    Hot Water Supply Range

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    100 150 200 250 300 350 400

    S

    t

    e

    a

    m

    T

    u

    r

    b

    i

    n

    e

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    Loop Temperature (F)

    Steam Supply Range

  • Alternative Fuels and Energy Evaluation

    Solar

    River Centre District Energy

    Heat Pumps

  • Alternative Fuels and Energy Evaluation

    Waste Incinerator

    Polk County

  • Alternative Fuels and Energy Evaluation

    Biomass/Biogas

    Andersen Inc.

  • Alternative Fuels and Energy Evaluation

    Industrial Waste Heat

    Andersen Inc.

  • District heating system utilizes a CHP system to

    maximize efficiency and operating cost

    Buildings are capable of heating with 160 degree

    water (low temp)

    Temperature differential between supply and return

    Elements of an Ideal Hot Water System

    Temperature differential between supply and return

    is 50 degrees or more

    Summer excess heat from CHP provides heat for

    absorption chillers

    A hot water storage tank in winter and chilled water

    storage tank in the summer shifts loads to match

    thermal to electrical loads

  • Questions and Answers

    Thank you!