District Annual Report 2013-2014 Donnie W. Evans, Ed.D. New Jersey State Board of Education January...
-
Upload
milton-morton -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of District Annual Report 2013-2014 Donnie W. Evans, Ed.D. New Jersey State Board of Education January...
District Annual Report2013-2014
Donnie W. Evans, Ed.D.New Jersey State Board of Education
January 7, 2015
Provide contexts for our work in PPS Challenges and obstacles Bright Futures Vision, Mission, Goals & Objectives
Review initiatives and strategies for transforming the district
Review process & academic outcomes (past & present)
Review “Next Steps”
2
School Board
Christopher Irving, President Chrystal Cleaves, Vice President
Wendy GuzmanJonathan Hodges, MD
Errol S. KerrManny Martinez
Kenneth SimmonsCorey TeagueFlavio Rivera
3
Total Students 28,167*Pre-K-12 25,256Pre-K (Private Providers) 2,911Special Education 3,355 LEP 3,764Free/Reduced Lunch 92% Instructional Staff 2,947Total Staff (including subs) 5,369Total Schools 54* Does not include Adult High students
4
The core business of schools and the school district is teaching and learning which drives all decisions and activities in the district.
All children can achieve at high levels and it is the responsibility of educators to create environments where student learning can occur.
Effective instruction makes the most difference in student achievement.
All staff must be committed to “children first” and to the pursuit of high student achievement.
All schools must be safe, caring and orderly to enable teachers to teach and students to learn.
Only through collaboration with and engagement of community organizations, institutions, agencies, and families can the district realize its vision and mission.
Bright Futures: Core Beliefs
5
Student academic outcomes NJASK HSPA SAT & ACT Graduation Rate Drop-out Rate College Admission & Completion Attendance Rates
6
School/District Culture – Low Expectations Family Engagement Facilities Fiscal Management Internal & External Communications Social Promotion Instructional & Leadership Capacity
7
“There’s a quiet revolution going on in Paterson Public Schools, and its aim is to teach children that communities are made by people who show up” – The Star Ledger Editorial – 10/13/14
Bright Futures: A Strategic Plan for the Children of Paterson
Strategic Plan 2009-2014
9
VisionTo be a leader in educating New Jersey’s urban youth
MissionTo prepare each student to be successful in the
institution of higher education of their choosing and in their chosen career
10
11
* - Work in progress areas
12
Priority Schools
School 10 (SIG)School 13School 15School 28School 6Rev. Dr. Frank Napier Jr. School (SIG)
Focus SchoolsSchool 2 School 18School 3 School 20School 5 School 21School 8 School 24School 11 School 25School 12 School 26
Dr. Martin Luther KingNew Roberto ClementeEHS- Information TechnologyEHS-Cul. Arts, Hospitality & Tour.EHS- Gov. and Public Admin.Academy High Schools
New Jersey’s NCLB WaiverPriority & Focus Schools
13
Restructured and re-staffed comprehensive high schools into small autonomous thematic schools Eastside Culinary Arts, Hospitality & Tourism Eastside Information Technology Eastside Government and Public Administration JFK Architecture & Construction Trades JFK Education and Training JFK Business, Technology, Marketing & Finance JFK Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math
Converted all high schools to “schools of choice”
Expanded Alternative High School Capacity
Accomplishments 2009-2013
14
Accomplishments 2009-2013 Restructured & re-staffed lowest performing elementary schools
School 4-Rev. Dr. Frank Napier, Jr. (SIG) School 6 School 10 (SIG)
Created three full service community schools (Schools 4, 5, & New Roberto Clemente)
Created first curriculum-based, student operated credit union
Implemented the Paterson Effective Schools Model to establish healthy school cultures
Initiated pre-K through grade 3 literacy initiative;
Ended Social Promotion;
Accomplishments 2009-2013
Auditor’s Management Report (AMR) for 2012-2013 indicates no repeat findings and “no findings that rose to the level of reporting under government auditing standards. Nor did we have any or significant deficiencies in internal controls…”
Completed Process re-design of operational and instructional processes and procedures and realized $2 million annual savings: Finance Human Resources Academic Services Assessment Student Registration Student Information Services Facilities Benefits
Acquired grant funding to support school improvement: Promise Community Grant to support Full Service Community Schools
- $2.3 million Affordable Care Act Grant
for school-based Health Centers in full service
schools - $500,000 Talent 21 grant to support
technology initiatives - $2.2 million School Improvement Grants (SIG)
for School 4 & 10 - $12 million (2 million annually per school)
Accomplishments 2009-2013
17
These objectives continue to drive our work: Build healthy school cultures & climates Efficient & responsive district operations Revise teacher & administrator evaluation systems Implement Common Core State Standards Implement high impact academic interventions for low
performing students Strengthen the district’s assessment system Build capacity among staff
Teachers Principals & vice-principals District administrators & supervisors
Transformation Objectives2013-2014
18
District Transformation Initiatives 2013-2014
ComprehensiveAssessment
System
Common Core Healthy School Culture
Capacity Building
Teacher/ Principal
Evaluation
High Impact Interventions
Efficient Operations
Star Math & ELA Univ. of Pittsburgh IFL
Paterson Effective Schools’ Model
Univ. of Pittsburgh IFL
Focal Point Innovation Zone Cliff Planning
PARCC Model Curriculum
Principal’sAutonomy
Pre K-3 LiteracyInitiative
Leadership Institute
Regional Achievement Center
Five-year Facilities Plan
ElementarySchoolChoice
School & District Restructuring & Re-staffing
End Social Promotion
Strategic Plan Development (2014-2019)
Special Education Restructuring
Attendance Initiative
ELL Restructuring
Graduation Enhancement
NJPBSIS
19
Awarded local control of the “operations” district performance review (DPR) area as a result of sustained high performance in this area.
The New Jersey School Development Authority (SDA) has commenced with construction of two new elementary schools: School 16 and Hazel Marshall Elementary School. Approval for a third new elementary school is likely in the near future.
Restructured elementary schools: Opened Gifted & Talented Academy (at School 28) Opened Newcomers School for non-English speaking students entering the district (School 11) Established New Roberto Clemente and Don Bosco as middle schools Restructured School 15 from K-8 to a pre-K-5 elementary school Expanded in-district pre-K program
PARCC Field test participant
Accomplishments 2013-2014
20
Accomplishments 2013-2014 Successfully negotiated a new contractual agreement with the
Paterson Education Association that features: Compensation for the previous four years Increased longevity pay for applicable PEA members; A new single Salary Guide Option for teachers; A pay for performance provision:
teachers rated highly effective can move up two steps on the appropriate salary guide, thus accelerating reaching maximum steps
teachers rated effective can move up one step on the appropriate salary guide;
Teachers rated ineffective or partially effective receive no step increases and must improve to retain their positions
Additional compensation for teachers who volunteer and are selected to teach in a district Turn-Around School;
Incentives for teachers joining the district to fill “hard to fill” positions in critical shortage subject areas.
Accomplishments 2013-2014
The district implemented its new teacher and principal evaluation systems (Focal Point Model).One outcome is that currently more than 10% of
district teachers have been placed on corrective action plans because of their classroom performance.
Individual contracts or agreements for senior staff (Assistant Superintendents and Division Chiefs) and other non-represented administrators will include pay for performance provisions beginning the 2015-2016 school year.
Accomplishments 2013-2014 Auditor’s Management Report (AMR) for 2013-14 indicates
no repeat findings and “no findings that rose to the level of reporting under government auditing standards. Nor did we have any or significant deficiencies in internal controls…”
The district has taken strong first steps to avoid a fiscal cliff in future years including, but not limited to: Budget freezes Reduction in district-level staff A reduction in district-level non-salary administrative costs A reduction in teaching positions A reduction of principals or vice principals on special assignment
Accomplishments 2013-2014
Acquired grant funding to support district initiatives: School Improvement Grants for School 6 & New Roberto
Clemente – $12 million ($2 million annually per school) 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program (2012-2017) -
$2,647,900 Race-to-the-Top Phase 3 (RTTT3) to support the implementation
of the revised Principal and Teacher Evaluation System - $1,271,064
School Based Health Centers for School 6 & School 15 - $500,000 Lowe’s Community Improvement Grant for School 4 - $100,000 Excellent Educators for New Jersey (EE4NJ) Pilot Program
Principal Effectiveness Evaluation System - $50,000 Optimum Lightpath Grant for PANTHER academy to purchase
equipment for a digital astronomy laboratory- $10,000 Other
24
Academic Outcomes2013-2014
25
Assessment Transition TimelineAre your assessments
transitioning?
Spring 2012
NJ ASK
Aligned to NJCCCS
Spring 2013
NJ ASK
Aligned to the CCSS
(except gr 6-8 Math)
Spring 2014
NJ ASK
Aligned to the CCSS
SY 2014-15
Full administration of PARCC assessments
“Transitional Assessments”
Source: NJDOE
2013 and 2014 State Assessment Grades 3-11Total Students – Two Year Comparison
Language Arts Literacy
2013 and 2014 State Assessment Grades 3-11
Total Students – Two Year ComparisonMathematics
HSPA 2004-2014 Language Arts and Mathematics
Proficient and AboveLanguage Arts
Literacy2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
TOTAL 54.7% 53.8% 52.6% 56.3% 49.3% 49.7% 51.7% 59.5% 66.4% 71.8% 74.6%
GENERAL ED. 70.6% 70.4% 69.3% 74.0% 65.7% 72.3% 69.9% 76.0% 80.% 88.6% 91.4%
SPECIAL ED. 6.1% 9.1% 7.3% 9.3% 8.3% 9.7% 15.6% 23.8% 37.0% 32.6% 39.9%
LMTD. ENG. PROF. 11.0% 8.1% 11.0% 11.6% 9.0% 13.2% 22.1% 22.7% 30.0% 23.9% 40.2%
MATHEMATICS 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
TOTAL 40.4% 47.2% 45.5% 39.7% 34.2% 31.9% 33.0% 30.9% 46.6% 49.7% 43.2%
GENERAL ED. 50.0% 58.7% 57.6% 52.4% 46.0% 47.3% 45.1% 41.2% 58.1% 60.7% 53.7%
SPECIAL ED. 9.1% 6.8% 4.5% 1.5% 1.9% 2.9% 7.3% 4.7% 13.9% 12.1% 9.4%
LMTD. ENG. PROF. 20.3% 26.7% 25.4% 16.1% 13.9% 8.2% 15.1% 8.6% 27.4% 30.4% 31.1%
29
“100% grad rate at Art High” Herald News - 12/4/14
High School Renewal Results
Paterson Public Schools Graduation/Dropout Rate*
Graduation Year
Total Students**
Graduated Dropouts Transfers Other
# % # % # % # %
2009 2112 964 45.60 435 20.60 470 22.25 243 11.50
2010 1960 987 50.36 350 17.86 400 20.41 223 11.38
2011 1444 881 64.0% 85 5.9% 124 8.6% 354 24.5%
2012 1467 974 66.4% 141 9.6% 95 6.5% 257 17.5%
2013 1538 1109 72.1% 166 10.8% 98 6.4% 165 10.7%
2014 1542 1149 74.2% 164 10.6% 87 5.6% 142 9.2%
*The “Four-Year Cohort Method” was used to calculate the Graduation/Drop-out rates
**Total students entering 9th grade as a “cohort”
31
Graduation Rate
Gains (+/-) +4.8 +13.6 +2.4 +5.5 +2.3
Graduation Rate
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Percentage 45.6% 50.4% 64.0% 66.4% 71.9% 74.2%
32
Total College Acceptances * 2011 – 1205 2012 – 1508 2013 - 1901 2014 - 1682
Two-year College 2011 – 430 students 2012 – 598 students 2013 – 595 students 2014 - 598 students
Four-year College 2011 – 243 students 2012 – 287 students 2013 – 318 students 2014 - 379 students
High School Renewal Results
* Students received acceptances to one or more colleges/universities
33
2013 and 2014 New Jersey Biology Competency Test (NJBCT)
District – Proficient & Above
SAT
Mean Score
PATERSON
2012
PATERSON
2013
PATERSON
2014
+/-
STATE 2012
STATE 2013
STATE 2014
+/-
Critical Reading
365 365 368+3
495 499 501 +2
Mathematics
389 389 392+3
517 522 523 +1
Writing 365 366 360 -6 499 500 502 +2
The highest achievable score on the SAT is 2400 total (a score of 800 in each area, Critical Reading, Writing, and Mathematics). The table below details the mean scores for Paterson as
compared to the state of New Jersey.
2013 and 2014 SAT Examination
“Paterson school district sees increase in perfect NJ ASK scores”
NorthJersey.com
2010-2014 NJASK 3-5 District Aggregate Total Students - Language Arts
2010-2014 NJASK 6-8 District Aggregate
Total Students - Language Arts
2010-2014 NJASK 3-8 District Aggregate
Total Students - Language Arts
2010-2014 NJASK 3-5 District Aggregate
Total Students - Mathematics
2010-2014 NJASK 6-8 District Aggregate
Total Students - Mathematics
2010-2014 NJASK 3-8 District Aggregate
Total Students - Mathematics
NJASK: District-wide
Special Note: The increase/decrease (+/-) column will be one tenth of a percent off due to rounding and calculations.
2011 2012 2013 2014
Language Arts Literacy
Grade % Proficient & Above
% Proficient & Above
% Proficient & Above
% Proficient & Above +/-
3 33.1% 37.2% 40.4% 36.7% -3.7%4 33.2% 33.8% 28.9% 31.5% 2.6%5 25.9% 34.2% 34.7% 29.5% -5.2%6 36.9% 33.5% 39.3% 39.1% -0.2%7 30.7% 31.1% 35.2% 38.0% 2.8%8 53.7% 58.7% 61.6% 54.4% -7.2% Mathematics
Grade % Proficient & Above
% Proficient & Above
% Proficient & Above
% Proficient & Above +/-
3 54.8% 59.5% 57.2% 59.5% 2.3%4 55.7% 53.5% 58.2% 56.0% -2.2%5 55.8% 60.6% 57.6% 61.5% 3.9%6 51.0% 55.0% 56.7% 57.2% 0.5%7 36.2% 36.9% 36.6% 39.3% 2.7%8 40.8% 40.0% 45.7% 45.9% 0.2%
44
2013 and 2014 NJASKPerformance By Demographic Group
District – Grade 4 Science 2013 2014
Demographic Group Enrolled
Valid Scale
Scores
# Proficient & Advanced Proficient
% Proficient & Advanced Proficient Enrolled
Valid Scale
Scores
# Proficient & Advanced Proficient
% Proficient & Advanced Proficient
Total Students 1,996 1,972 1408 71.4 1,905 1,869 1321 70.7
General Education 1,393 1,392 1114 80.0 1,388 1,382 1095 79.2
Special Education 303 280 139 49.7 265 238 116 48.8Limited English Proficient 450 448 267 59.6 446 440 250 56.8
Current LEP 324 322 168 52.2 283 278 120 43.2
Former LEP 126 126 99 78.6 163 162 130 80.2
Female 920 911 677 74.3 949 933 679 72.7
Male 1076 1061 731 68.9 956 936 642 68.6
White 105 105 82 78.0 105 102 79 77.5Black or African American 519 512 358 69.9 463 449 284 63.3
Asian 96 95 80 84.2 107 106 90 84.9
Hispanic or Latino 1,273 1,257 885 70.4 1,225 1,207 866 71.7
2013 and 2014 NJASKPerformance By Demographic Group
District – Grade 8 Science 2013 2014
Demographic Group Enrolled
Valid Scale
Scores
# Proficient & Advanced Proficient
% Proficient & Advanced Proficient Enrolled
Valid Scale
Scores
# Proficient & Advanced Proficient
% Proficient & Advanced Proficient
Total Students 1,999 1,973 1006 51.0 2,005 1,963 997 50.8
General Education 1,379 1,376 896 65.2 1,338 1,332 879 66.0
Special Education 360 339 67 19.8 382 347 54 15.6Limited English Proficient 295 292 53 18.1 343 341 86 25.2
Current LEP 277 274 44 16.1 302 301 64 21.3
Former LEP 18 18 9 50.0 41 40 22 55.0
Female 955 945 445 47.1 965 949 466 49.1
Male 1044 1028 561 54.5 1,040 1,014 531 52.4
White 86 85 60 70.6 93 90 60 66.7Black or African American 541 534 223 41.7 501 483 231 47.9
Asian 110 108 59 54.6 110 110 72 65.5
Hispanic or Latino 1,259 1,243 663 53.3 1,293 1,272 633 49.8
Next Steps for 2014-15
47
The Strategic Plan- Brighter Futures-
VisionTo be the leader in educating New Jersey’s urban
youth
MissionTo prepare each student for success in the
college/university of their choosing and in their chosen career
48
Effective Academic Programs: Programs are research based and outcomes driven
Creating and Maintaining Healthy School Cultures: Schools are safe to enable teachers to teach and students to learn
Family and Community Engagement: District and school staff collaborate with and engage families and community institutions, organizations, and agencies
Efficient and Responsive Operations: Operations supports the district and school’s core business (teaching and learning) and is responsive to the needs of staff, students, and community
49
50
District Transformation Initiatives 2014-2015
ComprehensiveAssessment
System
Common Core Healthy School Culture
Capacity Building
Teacher/ Principal
Evaluation
High Impact Interventions
Efficient & Responsive Operations
Star Math & ELA Instructional Model
Effective Schools
Univ. of Pittsburgh IFL
Achieve NJ Breakfast After the Bell
Cliff Planning
PARCC DOE Model Curriculum
NJPBSIS Pre K-3 LiteracyInitiative
Leadership Institute
RAC Five-year Facilities Plan
Unit Assessments Arts Initiative ElementarySchoolChoice
Urban Schools Human Capital Academy
End Social Promotion
Strategic Planning
CTE Initiative Family & Community Engagement Reformation
Strategic Data Project
Attendance Initiative
Technology Initiative
Special Education Restructuring
Graduation Enhancement
Transportation Restructuring
Guidance Restructuring
Facilities Restructuring
ELL Restructuring
51
Expand School Choice – Priority II/Goal 3 Add magnet schools (academic & career-focused) Prepare for two new schools expected to open fall 2016 Expand Early Childhood – HOPEVI Alexander Community Development Complete the restructuring of ELL/bilingual programs More high impact interventions for low performing students to improve academic performance
Extended day and year Paterson Reads Writers workshop Coaching teachers & principals
Next Steps for Elementary Schools
52
Elementary School Choice Student Assignment Options
Student assignment options include: Zoned neighborhood schools Magnet schools Controlled choice schools
Elementary students will have the option of attending their zoned neighborhood school, apply to attend a district magnet school or apply to attend a traditional district elementary school outside their neighborhood.
53
Districtwide Magnet ProgramsAdded to the array of existing magnets will be six
to eight additional theme-based magnet schools including: Fine and Performing Arts Mathematics and Science Literacy Technology Dual Language Single Gender Environmental Studies Other
54
Deepen the breath of thematic curriculum Expand advisories at each academy Rewrite curriculum for all high school courses International Baccalaureate/planning for diploma
program Expand SAT prep offerings Extended Learning School for Dropouts Expand Community Based Instruction (CBI)
opportunities for special education students
Next Steps for High Schools
55
Continue preparation for PARCC Complete restructuring of guidance services Continue capacity building at every level Increase parent involvement Address attendance challenges for chronically absent
children Explore new, and further develop existing
relationships with business, community and university partners in efforts to secure third party grant funding (private, State and Federal)
Next Steps Districtwide
56
“We can, whenever and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need to do that. Whether or not we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven't so far.”
Ronald Edmonds
57
For more information, contact:Dr. Donnie Evans – [email protected]. Eileen Shafer – [email protected]
Questions
58