Funding and Income Sources for a selection of overseas waterways
District 8 New Funding Project Selection Funding Presentation.pdfNew Funding Project Selection...
Transcript of District 8 New Funding Project Selection Funding Presentation.pdfNew Funding Project Selection...
District 8 New Funding Project Selection
Jon Huseby | District Engineer | ATP 8 Presentation | October 4, 2017
District 8 | mndot.gov
FY 2018 – 2021 Approach to 2017 New Funding
10/4/2017 2
Distribution of 17 New Funding
D1 D2 D3 D4 D6 D7 D8 Metro Statewide Project Delivery Total
Dollar $115 M $53 M $86 M $56 M $90 M $93 M $50 M $406 M $12 M $39 M $1 B
Percent 11.5% 5.3% 8.6% 5.6% 9% 9.3% 5% 40.6% 1.2% 3.9% 100%
10/4/2017 3
17 New Funding Distribution Process• Combined target distribution approach based on:
• The 4-year average distribution of DRMP funds• DRMP distribution with 50% weighted for Metro District• Distribution of State and Federal funds to Districts per STIP funding
guidance• The 4-year average of DRMP, SPP and ADA funds• DRMP, SPP and ADA distribution with 50% weighted for Metro District
Overarching Priorities for New Funding
• Consistency with MnSHIP
• Consistency with NexTen
• Assess Risks Identified in Current Program
10/4/2017 4
Priorities for New Funding
FY 2018 - 2021
• Alignment with NexTen
• Deliverability
• Improved performance outcomes
• Alignment with budget and funding
• Geographic distribution for total program – alignment with DRMP distribution formula
• Work type distribution
FY 2022 and Beyond
• District risk priorities
• Expansion/Capacity/Equity based on developed criteria:
• Greater Minnesota mobility
• Corridors of Commerce
• TED
10/4/2017 5
Project Selection Criteria for New Funding
1. Long-term pavement preservation projects
2. Additional bridge repairs and replacements to continue to meet performance targets.
3. Initial investments in major urban corridor projects like I-94 from St Paul to Minneapolis, and Twin Ports Interchange in Duluth, to reduce the impact on future programs.
4. Other priority investment areas that were funded below the MnSHIP levels
5. Areas identified by Districts as risks within their existing program
10/4/2017 6
MnDOT Project Selection Process for Regular Program
• Mn Go
• Other Statewide Plans
• MnSHIP
• Funding Targets
• Performance Measures
• Asset Condition
• Prediction Models
• Public Engagement
• Program and Construction Coordination
• Project Delivery
• Coordination with Local Agencies
10/4/2017 7
Timeline for New Funding Project Selection
• FY 18 projects already approved at July TPIC meeting
• Review FY 19-21 projects with ATPs and stakeholders
• Review FY 22 projects with normal ATP process
• Inclusion of 17NEW projects in 2019 – 2022 STIP in April 2018
10/4/2017 8
Project Selection Criteria for Corridors of Commerce Projects
10/4/2017 9
• The criteria used to score Corridors of Commerce projects was defined in legislation as:
1. Return on Investment
2. Measureable Impacts on Commerce & Economic Competitiveness
3. Efficiency in the Movement of Freight Including:
• Measures of AADT & HCAADT
• Measures of congestion or travel time reliability
4. Improvements to Traffic Safety
5. Connections to Regional Trade Centers, Local Highways & Other Transportation Modes
6. Addresses Multiple System Policy Objectives & Principles
7. Support and Consensus for Project by Surrounding Community
8. Regional Balance
Timeline for Corridors of Commerce Projects
• Summer 2017: MnDOT reviewing scoring criteria
• October – November 2017: ATP input meetings
*We will likely be scheduling an additional meeting for this outreach
• December 2017 – January 2018: Corridors of Commerce Project Recommendations
• February 2018: Project Selection
*Timeline is subject to change
10/4/2017 10
District 8 New Funding Project Selection (Continued)
Susann Karnowski | Assistant District Engineer | ATP 8 Presentation | October 4, 2017
District 8 | mndot.gov
Project Selection Criteria for New Funding
1. Long-term pavement preservation projects
2. Additional bridge repairs and replacements to continue to meet performance targets.
3. Initial investments in major urban corridor projects like I-94 from St Paul to Minneapolis, and Twin Ports Interchange in Duluth, to reduce the impact on future programs.
4. Other priority investment areas that were funded below the MnSHIP levels
5. Areas identified by Districts as risks within their existing program
10/4/2017 13
New Funding Project Selection Process
• Central Office Guidance
• Districts submitted projects to Central Office for review & prioritization
• CO scored them according to prioritization criteria
• Gather ATP input
• Make changes to projects, if needed
• Include in 2019 – 2022 STIP
10/4/2017 14
2018 District 8 Tier 1 Proposed Projects with New Funding
10/4/2017 15
Fiscal
YearAction Hwy Project Description Project Cost
2018 Added 277 Turnback (cash transfer) from MN 40 to MN 7 $9,600,000
2018Advance &
Increase ScopeDistrictwide
Bridge painting for bridges 5526, 34006,
42003, 43006 & 87008$1,560,000
2018 Added Districtwide Culvert lining $600,000
Total New Funding in 2018 $11,760,000
Projects Submitted by D8 and Selected for FY 2018
2019 - 2021 District 8 Tier 1 Proposed Projects with New Funding
10/4/2017 16
Fiscal
YearAction Hwy Project Description
Project
Cost
2019 Advanced 68Replace bridge 5432 over Lazarus Creek, 3.6 miles west of
Canby; replace 24” CMP$1,440,000
2020 Advanced 753” CIR and 2” overlay plus ADA in Bellingham from Twp 127
(north of Hwy 212) to MN 7 (22.2 miles) except in Madison$8,655,000
2021Advance &
Increase Scope212
Unbonded concrete overlay from 2.3 miles east of MN 23 to
Renville (10.9 miles), plus reconstruction in Sacred Heart$26,100,000
Total New Funding in 2019 - 2021 $36,195,000
Projects Submitted by D8 and Selected for Proposal into the STIP for 2019 - 2021
District 8 Tier 2 Projects with New Funding
10/4/2017 17
Hwy Action Project Description
271Possible flex from 2022 to as
early as 2019
Reclaim and overlay Hwy 271 from MN 19 to Hendricks and
thin mill and overlay north of Hendricks to the South Dakota
state line
4Possible flex from 2026 to as
early as 2020
Reclaim and bituminous overlay on Hwy 4 from Northern Cross
Ave. (Cosmos) to .5 miles north of Township 243
19Possible flex from 2024 to as
early as 2019
Rehab bridge #5133 on Hwy 19 over the Redwood River in
Redwood Falls
Projects Submitted by D8 and Selected as Tier 2 for Possible Advancement in the STIP
District 8 New Funding Projects Submitted but Not Selected
10/4/2017 18
Hwy Action Project Description
23Move ahead from
2020 to 2019
Mill and concrete overlay of Hwy 23 from Cottonwood to
Granite Falls, plus replace bridges 91419, 91420 & 91459,
panels on 87007, ADA and turn lanes
TBDAdd; undetermined
yearUndetermined shoulder widening project
40 Advance Replace bridge # 6706 on Hwy 40 east of Madison
71 AdvanceReplace bridge # 5543 on Hwy 71 over the Cottonwood River,
approximately 3 miles south of US 14
Projects Submitted by D8 but Not Selected for New Funding
Summary of D8 New Funding
10/4/2017 19
Description DollarsFY 2018 Project Commitments $11,760,000
FY 2019 – 2021 Project Commitments $36,195,000
Preliminary Engineering for Tier 2
Projects$984,000
TBD $1,061,000
Total New Funding in D8 $50,000,000