Distributed Learning

31
Distributed Learning Brian Hawkins & Diana Oblinger October 12, 2000

description

Distributed Learning. Brian Hawkins & Diana Oblinger October 12, 2000. Consider a few facts…. The US currently spends $740 billion per year on education... ... more than is spent on national defense … more than the GDPs of Spain, Canada or Brazil Moe, 1999. Consider a few facts…. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Distributed Learning

Page 1: Distributed Learning

Distributed Learning

Brian Hawkins & Diana Oblinger

October 12, 2000

Page 2: Distributed Learning

Consider a few facts….

The US currently spends $740 billion per year on education...

... more than is spent on national defense

… more than the GDPs of Spain, Canada or Brazil

Moe, 1999

Page 3: Distributed Learning

Consider a few facts….

• Distance education is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 33% (IDC)

• Demand for distance education will grow to 15% of all students by 2002

• The e-learning market is expected to reach $46 billion by 2005

Page 4: Distributed Learning

Consider a few facts….

• Over 5,000 competitors offer all types of e-learning; no single competitor has more than a 5% market share

• Last year, over 100 e-learning portals entered the market

• Partnerships between “non-traditional” providers and universities are increasing

Page 5: Distributed Learning

Distributed Learning

Thinking about whether

and/or

how to enter this area

www.northcarolina.edu/educause/de/

Page 6: Distributed Learning

Hype or Reality?

• How large is this market?

• What will be the impact on residential education?

• What role should “my” campus play?

Page 7: Distributed Learning

Concerns to be Examined

• Definition of distributed learning

• Realistic estimates of the market

• Institutional motivations

• Assumptions

• Matrix of responsibilities

• Institutional readiness

Page 8: Distributed Learning

Definitions

Distributed learning is the delivery of education via electronic media, including intranets, extranets, satellite broadcast, etc. It uses technology to deliver learning that is independent of time and place.

Page 9: Distributed Learning

The Marketplace

• Higher education is not a single marketplace.

• It is a host of markets and distributed learning adds even more market segments.

Page 10: Distributed Learning

Traditional Students

•18-22 year olds•16 million students

Page 11: Distributed Learning

New Traditional Students

•18-22 year olds•4 million more

•Many campuses are out of space•Might need 130 new campuses•New campus costs:

•$350 M to build•$323 M to operate

•Is this a realistic solution?

Page 12: Distributed Learning

Adult Learners in the US

• 28 million

• Workforce should spend 20% of time engaged in learning

• Equivalent to 30 credits every 7 years •Do we have the space?

•Will they even come to campus?

Page 13: Distributed Learning

International Learners

•Possibly 100 million

•Results in potentially huge market

Page 14: Distributed Learning

How Realistic are the Projections for US Providers?

What effect do the following have on the size and complexity of the market?– Language– Culture– Cost– Connectivity

Page 15: Distributed Learning

Other Potential Market-Limiting Factors

• Ability to pay

• Willingness to pay

• Role of accreditation

• Transferrability

Page 16: Distributed Learning

Who is the Competition?

Page 17: Distributed Learning

• Professional Advancement

• Business Health Teacher training

• Apollo, DeVry, ITT

Focused Market Players

Page 18: Distributed Learning

• Shared risk

• Leverage

• WGU, KVU

• Unext

Higher Ed Consortia

Page 19: Distributed Learning

• K-12 arena?• Charter & role• Sylvan

• Alumni• Community

Remediation & Enrichment

Page 20: Distributed Learning

• Mass scale

• Internal conflicts

• Provant, Ziff

Corporate Training

Page 21: Distributed Learning

• Viability?

• Leverage?

• Infrastructure cost?

• Marketing cost?

Individual Campus Strategy

Page 22: Distributed Learning

Institutional Motivations

• To increase access to education and to serve the public good

• To increase capacity

• To improve teaching and learning

• To make money

Page 23: Distributed Learning

Assumptions

• The course is the unit of measure for learning

• Traditional institutional models will be successful

• Quality from for-profit providers is inferior

• Distributed learning is a viable option for all institutions

Page 24: Distributed Learning

Topics

• Rationale/Need for DE• Definition• Market• Academic Issues• Technical Issues• Support/Services• Organization• Policies• Financing• Institutional Self-Assessment

Page 25: Distributed Learning

Technical Issues

• Hardware/software

• Network

• Support

• Course management systems

• Content conversion

• Security

Page 26: Distributed Learning

Academic Issues

• Articulation

• Program selection

• Student readiness

• Quality

• Residency

• Workload

• Rewards

Page 27: Distributed Learning

Policies

• Intellectual property

• Conflict of interest

• Conflict of commitment

• Accessibility

• Appropriate use

• Privacy

Page 28: Distributed Learning

Support Structures

• Application

• Registration

• Counseling

• Library

• Career services

Page 29: Distributed Learning

Integration

• Does your distributed learning plan integrate with:– institutional plan– academic plan– financial plan– technology plan?

• Can your campus effectively collaborate?

Page 30: Distributed Learning

Risk

• Is your campus prepared for the risk:– external forces– internal forces– market risk– economic risk

Page 31: Distributed Learning

Summary

• Is distributed learning right for us? Today? In the future?

• Have we analyzed the market correctly?

• How do we divide the responsibilities to ensure success?

• Are we ready to move forward?