Disney’s ‘Alice in Wonderland’: “Three Coins from

a Dead Man’s Pocket”

View trailer

In the tradition that began with ‘Dogville’ in 2004 comes this incredibly

creative 2010-released movie that contains the lexicon from beginning to

end. It’s demonstrative of how much Hollywood has embraced the global

coalition’s agenda and celebrates the Canadian lawyer’s modern day David

vs. Goliath X2 struggle. Now comes another geo-production, which like its

predecessors embeds the lexicon and standard communiqués throughout.

Watching the movie and marveling at how exceptionally creative and visually

stimulating it was – the results of combining democracy and free market

capitalism – in the 3-D Imax format reminded the Canadian of the

entrepreneurial opportunity he was robbed of in the late 1980s to make way

for him becoming an enslaved and deprived human experimentation victim.

He foresaw exactly what evolved in the then budding computer animation

industry.

He fully expected to observe the contribution he made to civilization that

wasn’t planned for, and only arose because his life was hijacked – the

lexicon and his coalition’s tenacious resolve to achieving stated objectives.

Alice in Wonderland is a 2010 fantasy adventure film directed by Tim Burton, written by Linda Woolverton, and starring Mia Wasikowska,

Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Crispin Glover, Michael Sheen and Stephen Fry. It is an extension of Lewis Carroll's novels Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. The film uses a technique of combining live action and computer animation.

In the film, Alice is now nineteen years old and accidentally returns to Underland (misheard by Alice and believed to be called Wonderland), a place she visited thirteen years previously. She is told that she is the only one who can slay the Jabberwocky, a dragon-like creature

controlled by the Red Queen who terrorizes Underland's inhabitants. Source: wikipedia.com

The lead male and female actors, Johnny Depp and Anne Hathaway, have

been coalition partners since May 2007 and February 2008 respectively; as

has Disney since purchasing PIXAR from Steve Jobs in 2006. Director Tim

Burton used the movie as the means to announce he’d joined by generously

employing the lexicon.

The confidential language isn't cryptically embedded on the fringes of the

film. Burton et al. add various constituents in full and regular view. Depp’s

character, the Mad Hatter, is wardrobed to include a combination Taylor

Identifier, quantum ratifier and China identifier; achieved by tucking a scrap

of paper in the hat’s brim strap with the number 170/6.

What's the geo-significance of this beyond embedding these lexiconic

constituents? Mathematically 170 divided by 6 = a Sorkin China identifier

and a coalition identifier ad infinitum:

Alice is attacked by a ferocious beast early in the movie and wounded on her

right arm. To the end, the audience observes a coalition identifying

diplomatically coercive three large scratch marks.

Attire is also geo-politicized. A third way through Alice’s dress contains

Canadian prison certainty.

And the characters of Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum insert prison certainty

throughout.

Not more than a few minutes elapsed before the lexicon is employed. The

movie begins when Alice as a 6-year old girl. Her father, portrayed as an

entrepreneur with global aspirations, is counseling on her on the meaning of

dreams during sleep and a wild imagination. When producers fast-forward

to her young teens, a caption is added that the leap forward is “13 years

later” – another Taylor Identifier.

At the beginning of the scene in which a party for her engagement to an

18th century English Lord is held, two of Alice’s relatives exclaim her

deceased’s father’s been gone for “over 20 years”; thus inserting

condemnation for enslaving and torturous human experimentation early and

a coercive threat of premature mortality for Chinada principals; and creating

a rich geo-context for the rest of the production.

Her husband-to-be asks to meet her away from the guests in the garden,

where he intends on asking her to marry him. The gazebo is designed with

prison certainty in mind to inject the isolation-deprivation (love, marriage)

theme into the script.

The most pronounced initiative in coercive diplomacy is when Alice meets

with the White Queen, played by Anne Hathaway. Because Alice’s size has

varied from very tall to very small, and at this point is the former, the Queen

prepares a magic potion to reduce her to normal. As she’s concocting it she

states:

A pinch of worm fat. U-rine of a horsefly. Three coins from a dead man's pocket. Two teaspoons of wishful thinking. That should do it.

View video [@ 0:14]

This combines a coalition identifier with a quantum ratifier: a not-so-veiled

threat to arrange the transfer of wealth from the lethal force assassinated or

capital punishment executed to the Canadian lawyer.

Tim Burton’s uber-extraordinary creativity is evident throughout; like when

conceiving of the design of the Red Queen’s royal guard. Taking direction

from previous productions, they are in the form of playing cards. Many

times he combines various cards to create lexiconic numbers. In a scene

involving the Mad Hatter pleading for his life before the tyrannical sovereign

is the combination that creates a coalition identifier -- drawing attention to

the partnership's military assets' ability to manage China prisoners being

readied for prosecution before the 'Iron Fist' tribunal. A quantum ratifier

and coalition and China identifiers are embedded in the set design.

The lab monkey metaphor is inserted by way of scripting tiny chimps to be

candelabra holders and later the legs of table. And the 'pigs at the trough'

constituent of Chinada governance is added when the Queen is scripted to

demand a foot stool. The colors of punishment for principals of the China-

Canada alliance are used to red flag this as condemnation-relevant.

The movie ends in true coalition form. Upon Alice’s return to her world she

rejects her family’s arranged marriage and is scripted to interact with the

father of the former husband-to-be. She reveals her father’s disposition for

thinking globally and the seasoned businessman offers to apprentice her.

The closing scene is at the port where she’s on a ship embarking on her first

entrepreneurial adventure – to China.