Discussion Regarding Changes to the Household Hazardous Waste Grant Program.
-
Upload
lizbeth-small -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Discussion Regarding Changes to the Household Hazardous Waste Grant Program.
Discussion Regarding Changes to the Household
Hazardous Waste Grant Program
PurposePresent BACKGROUND on Present BACKGROUND on
HHW Grant ProgramHHW Grant ProgramDiscuss TRENDS in HHW Discuss TRENDS in HHW
collectioncollectionStimulate discussion of changesStimulate discussion of changes
Item HistoryBoard establishes annual Board establishes annual
program criteriaprogram criteriaSept. Award of grants raised Sept. Award of grants raised
questions about cost-questions about cost-effectiveness of projectseffectiveness of projects
This begins discussion for This begins discussion for FY 04/05 Criteria (Jan ’04)FY 04/05 Criteria (Jan ’04)
Program CriteriaStatute driven: Changes in Statute driven: Changes in
1992 and 19931992 and 1993 shift focus to: shift focus to:Rural, Underserved & SmallRural, Underserved & SmallRegional programsRegional programsCollection of targeted waste Collection of targeted waste
types, innovative or more cost-types, innovative or more cost-effective methods & educationeffective methods & education
Program History12 Cycles of Funding12 Cycles of FundingAverage funding level $3M Average funding level $3M
until this cycle at $4.5Muntil this cycle at $4.5M$323 Million funded$323 Million funded290 grants290 grants
Attachment Attachment 11
TRENDSSB 20 E-WasteSB 20 E-Waste
Generates fee for recyclingGenerates fee for recyclingMay eliminate need for May eliminate need for
HHW grant priority to HHW grant priority to collect E-wastecollect E-waste
TRENDSOn-Going O&M for LocalsOn-Going O&M for Locals
O&M costs have not been O&M costs have not been eligible expenseseligible expenses
Some locals are strapped to Some locals are strapped to cover these costs after cover these costs after CIWMB “invests” in local CIWMB “invests” in local facilitiesfacilities
TRENDSCost-EffectivenessCost-Effectiveness
Permanent Facilities Most Permanent Facilities Most Cost-EffectiveCost-Effective
Other options (curbside & Other options (curbside & door-to-door) good for door-to-door) good for special needs clientsspecial needs clients
TRENDSPermanent FacilitiesPermanent Facilities
21 counties or 1/3 of state21 counties or 1/3 of stateSan Bernardino has more than San Bernardino has more than
any county (16)any county (16)LA and San Diego have 7 LA and San Diego have 7
facilities eachfacilities each
Attachment 2Attachment 2
TRENDSDoor-to-Door or CurbsideDoor-to-Door or Curbside
Meets Needs of elderly, Meets Needs of elderly, disabled or homebounddisabled or homebound
Costs can vary depending on Costs can vary depending on communitycommunity
Issue: Should they be served Issue: Should they be served before infrastructure needs?before infrastructure needs?
TRENDSRanking Based On Need Ranking Based On Need
Model-- Rubberized Asphalt Model-- Rubberized Asphalt Concrete (RAC) Grant Concrete (RAC) Grant programprogram
Formula requires baseline Formula requires baseline data & strategic goalsdata & strategic goals
Streamlines grant reviewStreamlines grant review
Partnership OpportunityBi-Monthly Info. ExchangesBi-Monthly Info. Exchanges
No/So meetings already No/So meetings already scheduledscheduled
Stakeholders attend and are Stakeholders attend and are actively engagedactively engaged
Forum for sharing “best Forum for sharing “best practices”practices”
Partnership OpportunityOn-line HHW ListservOn-line HHW Listserv
Opportunity for all to provide Opportunity for all to provide feedback & inputfeedback & input
Stakeholders already Stakeholders already participateparticipate
Forum for sharing “best Forum for sharing “best practices”practices”
Partnership OpportunityAnnual Forum/ConferenceAnnual Forum/Conference
March 2004 in SacramentoMarch 2004 in SacramentoAgenda in formative stageAgenda in formative stageEasy for Board to Easy for Board to
participateparticipate
Some Options to ConsiderNon-competitiveNon-competitive Program Program
based on Populationbased on Population½ $$$ for Facilities on priority ½ $$$ for Facilities on priority
list list + + ½ $$$ on per capita basis, ½ $$$ on per capita basis, including O&Mincluding O&M
2 Phase Award2 Phase Award—Yr 1: facility —Yr 1: facility planning; Yr 2: Constructionplanning; Yr 2: Construction
FY 2004/05 HD13 GrantsCriteria Item to Board in JanCriteria Item to Board in JanApplications due in AprilApplications due in AprilAward Item in July ‘04Award Item in July ‘04Funding Level???Funding Level???
HD13 Questions/IssuesTypes of Programs Board Types of Programs Board
would like to emphasizewould like to emphasizeFunding for E-Waste??Funding for E-Waste??How to rate or score Cost-How to rate or score Cost-
Effectiveness?Effectiveness?Role for door-to-door or Role for door-to-door or
curbside collection?curbside collection?