Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

16
+33 2 40 18 09 16 [email protected] www.systemplus.fr 22 bd Benoni Goullin 44200 NANTES - FRANCE Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 Comprehensive technology and cost comparisons of 29 discrete packages of power devices from 12 manufacturers including Infineon, STMicroelectronics, and ROHM. SPR21596 - Power Electronics report by Amine ALLOUCHE Physical analysis by Tom HERVE October 2021 - Sample REVERSE COSTING® – STRUCTURAL, PROCESS & COST REPORT

Transcript of Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

Page 1: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 1

+33 2 40 18 09 16 [email protected] www.systemplus.fr22 bd Benoni Goullin

44200 NANTES - FRANCE

Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

Comprehensive technology and cost comparisons of 29 discrete packages of power devices from 12 manufacturers including Infineon, STMicroelectronics, and ROHM.

SPR21596 - Power Electronics report by Amine ALLOUCHEPhysical analysis by Tom HERVE

October 2021 - Sample

REVERSE COSTING® – STRUCTURAL, PROCESS & COST REPORT

Page 2: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 2

Table of Contents

Overview / Introduction 4

o Executive summary

o Reverse costing methodology

o Glossary

Technology & Market 8

o Market overview

o Technology choices of analyzed packages

Physical Analysis 15

Per Body Size (mm²):

o (1×1): CSP

o (3×1): SOT-23

o (3×2): TSOP-6, TSMT8

o (3×3): SOT1210, SON3x3

o (5×3): SOT-89

o (5×4): SOIC-8

o (5×5): SOP/DSOP Advance

o (5×6): PDFN56U, SSO8, SO-8FL, PowerFLAT™ [5x6, 5x6 Double

Island, 5x6 DSC]

o (7×6): DPAK+,DPAK-5,DPAK

o (7×7): sTOLL

o (8×8): ThinPAK 8x8

o (10×9): TOLG,D²PAK,D²PAK7, H²PAK-6

o (15×6): DDPAK

o (10×10): TOLT, H-PSOF8L

o (20×15): TO-247

Technology and Physical Comparison 77

o Overall molded Package Volume – Breakdown (Wires, Die, Attaches, Leadframe,

Clips, Ribbons, Molding)

o Dies vs. Copper Volume % of Molded Package Volume

o Dies Volume % of Molded Package Volume

Manufacturing Process Flow 82

o Hypotheses

o Process 1: CSP (Unmolded)

o Process 2: Wires

o Process 3: Clips

o Process 4: Wires + Ribbon

o Process 5: Wires + Clips

Cost Analysis 89

o Yields explanation & hypotheses

o For each of the 29 packages:✓ Assembly cost per process step✓ Assembly cost breakdown per equipment, cleanroom, labor, consumable, and

yield losses.✓ Packaging cost breakdown per BOM, assembly, final test and yield losses.

Cost Comparison 123

o Comparisons include packaging cost breakdown (BOM, assembly…)

o Package cost per volume.

Feedback 127

Related Analyses 129

System Plus Consulting Services 131

Page 3: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 3

Overview / Introductiono Executive Summaryo Reverse Costing

Methodologyo Glossary

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consulting

Executive Summary

The discrete power devices market represented US$12.3 billion in 2020 with a 4.9% CAGR between 2020 and 2026according to Yole Intelligence, strongly driven by Automotive and Industrial applications.

Several key aspects drive this industry: a wide selection of products and suppliers, the use of standardized products andtechnologies, lower cost per device, and more.

To succeed in the innovation and efficiency race, discrete power device manufacturers should not rely on thesemiconductor aspect only. In fact, when chasing the optimum configuration for electrical, thermal, and mechanicalperformance, they must battle with the reliability and cost of packaging that are also very important parameters. Morethan a simple “shell”, the packaging can make or break a design, and thus it should be adapted to the dies and notdeteriorate their properties.

Different technology variables are tackled: package type, interconnection method, die attach, miniaturization trend,targeted application, and more.

In this context, System Plus Consulting presents an overview of 29 state-of-the-art discrete packages of power devicesfrom Infineon, STMicroelectronics, ROHM, onsemi, Toshiba, Vishay, Microchip, Nexperia, Littelfuse, Taiwan Semi, TexasInstruments, and Nuvoton.

The 29 devices include 14 automotive-qualified AEC-Q101 MOSFETs, 26 Si MOSFETs, 2 Si Superjunctions, and one SiCMOSFET. They cover 9 voltage classes (from 12V to 1200V).

This report highlights the differences in their technology parameters and design and their impact on production cost,along with providing optical pictures of the device’s opened-package and cross-sections. The focus of the report ispackaging technology, and hence the devices are analyzed and costs are simulated at packaging level. Yet some aspectsof the dies that are linked to their assembly in package are highlighted.

Finally, this report provides a comprehensive physical and technological comparison as well as manufacturing costcomparisons of the analyzed discrete packages.

Page 4: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 4

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis Body Size (mm²):o (1×1): CSPo (3×1): SOT-23o (3×2): TSOP-6, TSMT8o (3×3): SOT1210, SON3x3o (5×3): SOT-89o (5×4): SOIC-8o (5×5): SOP/DSOP Advanceo (5×6): PDFN56U, SSO8, SO-8FL,

PowerFLAT™ [5x6, 5x6 Double Island, 5x6 DSC]

o (7×6): DPAK+,DPAK-5,DPAKo (7×7): sTOLLo (8×8): ThinPAK 8x8o (10×9): TOLG,D²PAK,D²PAK7,

H²PAK-6o (15×6): DDPAKo (10×10): TOLT, H-PSOF8Lo (20×15): TO-247

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost ComparisonRelated AnalysesAbout System Plus Consulting

Body Size : (x) mm²

Page 5: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 5

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis Body Size (mm²):o (1×1): CSPo (3×1): SOT-23o (3×2): TSOP-6, TSMT8o (3×3): SOT1210, SON3x3o (5×3): SOT-89o (5×4): SOIC-8o (5×5): SOP/DSOP Advanceo (5×6): PDFN56U, SSO8, SO-8FL,

PowerFLAT™ [5x6, 5x6 Double Island, 5x6 DSC]

o (7×6): DPAK+,DPAK-5,DPAKo (7×7): sTOLLo (8×8): ThinPAK 8x8o (10×9): TOLG,D²PAK,D²PAK7,

H²PAK-6o (15×6): DDPAKo (10×10): TOLT, H-PSOF8Lo (20×15): TO-247

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost ComparisonRelated AnalysesAbout System Plus Consulting

Body Size : (x) mm²

Page 6: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 6

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consulting

Breakdown

Page 7: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 7

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysiso (1×1) : CSPo (3×1) : SOT-23o (3×2): TSOP-6, TSMT8o (3×3): SOT1210, SON3x3o (5×3): SOT-89o (5×4): SOIC-8o (5×5): SOP/DSOP Advanceo (5×6): PDFN56U, SSO8, SO-

8FL, PowerFLAT™ [5x6, 5x6Double Island, 5x6 DSC]

o (7×6): DPAK+,DPAK-5,DPAKo (7×7): sTOLLo (8×8): ThinPAK 8x8o (10×9):

TOLG,D²PAK,D²PAK7, H²PAK-6

o (15×6): DDPAKo (10×10): TOLT, H-PSOF8Lo (20×15): TO-247

Cost ComparisonRelated AnalysesAbout System Plus Consulting

Body Size : (x) mm²

Page 8: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 8

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consulting

Packaging Cost Comparison

Page 9: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 9

R E L A T E DA N A L Y S E S

Page 10: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 10

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consulting

Related Analyses

RELATED TEARDOWN TRACKSRELATED REPORTS

By System Plus Consulting:• GeneSiC 1200V Gen3 and

3300V Gen2 SiC MOSFETs

• Automotive Low-Voltage Si MOSFET Comparison 2021

• Silicon IGBT Comparison 2021

• SiC Transistor Comparison 2020

• Medium Voltage GaN HEMT vs Superjunction MOSFET Comparison 2019

By Yole Développement:• Silicon MOSFET Market and

Technology Trends 2021

• IGBT Market and TechnologyTrends 2021

• Status of the Power ElectronicsIndustry 2020

By System Plus Consulting:• Automotive Teardown Tracks

Page 11: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 11

COMPANYSERVICES

Page 12: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 12

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consultingo Company serviceso Contact

Our Core Activity : Reverse Costing®

A Structure, Process and Cost Analysis

Reverse Costing® consists of disassembling a device or a system in orderto identify its technology and discern its manufacturing processes andthen using in-house models and tools to determine its cost.

Page 13: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 13

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consultingo Company serviceso Contact

Fields Of Expertise

Page 14: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 14

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consultingo Company serviceso Contact

Business Model

Teardown Track

205+ teardowns per

year

Monitor1 per year quarterly updated

Custom Analysis150 custom analyses per

year

Report60+ per year

Costing Tools

5 process-based and 3 parametric

costing tools

Cost MethodsTrainingOn demand

Page 15: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 15

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consultingo Company serviceso Contact

Worldwide Presence

100+ collaborators in 8 different countries

Headquarters› Nantes – System Plus Consulting› Lyon – Yole Développement

Boise

CorneliusRaleighPhoenix

Austin

Singapore

Hsinchu

TokyoShenzhen

Seoul

Frankfurt

Nantes

Lyon

Page 16: Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021

©2021 by System Plus Consulting | SPR21596 - Discrete Power Device Packaging Comparison 2021 | Sample 16

Overview / Introduction

Technology & Market

Physical Analysis

Technology and Physical Comparison

Manufacturing Process Flow

Cost Analysis

Cost Comparison

Related Analyses

About System Plus Consultingo Company serviceso Contact

Contact

REPORTS, MONITORS & TRACKS

Follow us on

Europe and RoW

Lizzie Levenez - [email protected]

+49 15 123 544 182

Benelux, UK & Scandinavia

Marine Wybranietz - [email protected]

+49 69 96 21 76 78

South Germany & France

Martine Komono - [email protected]

+49 173 69 43 31

DACH (North Germany, Austria, Switzerland)

Neha CHAUDHURY - [email protected]

+49 172 97 47 248

Western US & Canada

Hal Levy - [email protected]

+1 408 334 0554

Eastern US & Canada

Chris Youman - [email protected]

+1 919 607 9839

India and RoA

Takashi Onozawa - [email protected]

+81 80 4371 4887

Greater China

Mavis Wang - [email protected]

+886 979 336 809 +86 136 6156 6824

Korea

Peter Ok - [email protected]

+82 10 4089 0233

Japan

Miho Ohtake - [email protected]

+81 34 4059 204

Japan and Singapore

Itsuyo Oshiba - [email protected]

+81 80 3577 3042

Japan

Toru Hosaka – [email protected]

+81 90 1775 3866

HEADQUARTER & CUSTOM PROJECT SERVICES

22 Bd Benoni Goullin44200 Nantes, France

[email protected] - +33 2 40 18 09 16

REPORTS & MONITORS WEBSITE

www.systemplus.fr

TRACKS WEBSITE

www.reverse-costing.com

MARKETING, COMMUNICATION & PR

Brice Le Gouic, Marketing & [email protected] - +81 80 8131 7837

Sandrine Leroy, Public [email protected] - +33 4 72 83 01 89