Discrete Element Method Lagggrangian approach used in ...
Transcript of Discrete Element Method Lagggrangian approach used in ...
Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations: A(DEM) simulations: A Lagrangian approach used g g ppin granular materials and multiphase flowsmultiphase flows
Payman JalaliAdjunct [email protected]
ContentsContents
• Granular Materials, Gas-Solid Systems and Lagrangian Models
• Discrete Element Method (DEM) ( )
• Applications in Dense Packs
• Applications in Dilute Systems: Comparison to Eulerian Models
• Linking 1D Gas Flow to DEM• Linking 1D Gas Flow to DEM
• Other Lagrangian Methods: Hard Sphere (Disk) Model
Granular Materials, Gas-SolidSystems and Lagrangian Models
• Granular material, a collection of solid grains as a bulk
• It behaves strangely: A fourth state of matter (continuum media?)g y f ( )
• Deformation (or its rate) not uniform
Eff f i i i l fl id• Effects of interstitial fluid
• Size and shape of individual grains
• Mechanical properties of individual grains
Granular Materials, Gas-SolidSystems and Lagrangian Models
Gas Solid systems are mainly found inGas-Solid systems are mainly found influidized beds with different processesinvolved such as combustion, gasification,drying or simply heat transferdrying, or simply heat transfer.
Granular Materials, Gas-SolidSystems and Lagrangian Models
Why Lagrangian models are needed?
• Complex dynamics of granular phase can be explained and• Complex dynamics of granular phase can be explained and
understood by modeling in particle scale.
• The results can be extended to verify/modify the Eulerian models
used in very large industrial systemsused in very large industrial systems.
• Sometimes they are the only way to study particulate systems
such as the study of large particle packing.
Discrete Element Method (DEM)Discrete Element Method (DEM)
Scale based classification of simulations
Micro‐Scale Meso‐Scale Macro‐Scale
Scale-based classification of simulations
Micro Scale
Individual particle base
Meso Scale
Local cell base
Macro Scale
System base
DEMParticleMotion
Trajectories of individual particles
Continuummodel(multi‐dimension)
Continuum model(one‐dimension)
FluidMotion
Flow aroundindividual particles
Local averaging(multi‐dimension)
One‐dimensional
Two fluidDNS
L‐EL‐E
DNS: Direct Numerical Simulation
Two‐fluidmodel (E‐E)
DNS
E: Eulerian
L: Lagrangian
Discrete Element Method (DEM)Discrete Element Method (DEM)
i Fi
CnijF
CtijF
j
nij
jijn
jtij
Forces from Hertzian theory:
KF )( 2/3
sijtjtijtCtij
ijijrijnjnijnCnij
k
K
vδF
nnvF
)( 2/3
ijjiiijijrijrijsij
jirij
nωωrnnvvv
vvv
)()(
tCtijtij
ijCnijfCtijCnijfCtij kFδ
tFFFF
/ If
jCtijCnijCi )( FFF
sijsijij
tCtijtij
vvt /
j
CtijijsiCi
j
r )( FnT
Discrete Element Method (DEM)
Th l iff K i l iff
Discrete Element Method (DEM)
The normal stiffness Kn, tangential stiffnesskt, and damping factors n and t areobtained from the Hertzian theory:
214 RRK
212
22
1
21 113 RR
EE
Kn
2/1
21
21
228
nijt
RR
RRk
2121
RRGG
modulus sYoung' :E :modulusShear E
Radius :ratio sPoisson' :
R
)1(2
EG
Discrete Element Method (DEM)Discrete Element Method (DEM)
The damping factor can be determined by:
Here, varies between 0 and 1 mostly and it is related to the coefficient of i i
4/12/1)( nijntn mK
restitution.
22 )(ln)ln(5
ee
Discrete Element Method (DEM)
START
Discrete Element Method (DEM)
START
Read Initial datadata
Build the table for potential contacting
Contact forces on each particle & potential contacting
neighborsp
deformations
Yes
Torques on each particleIf t<tf ?STOP
No
Linear & angular accelerations using forces &
Velocities & positions at new ti t
Update neighbors list if needed using forces &
torquestime steplist if needed
Applications in Dense PacksApplications in Dense Packs
Stacking and sedimentation of particlesApplication in nuclear pebble bed reactor(H. Suikkanen, J. Ritvanen, P. Jalali)
• 400 000 fuel particles are settled under gravity.• The environment of each particle is analyzed byV i llVoronoi cells.• The overall packing properties studied.• The DEM code is parallel.• Real earthquake signal is applied to see the• Real earthquake signal is applied to see thechanges caused by it.
Applications in Dilute Systems: Comparison to Eulerian ModelsIn a typical fluidized bed system there are several phases involved The gas (or liquid)In a typical fluidized bed system, there are several phases involved. The gas (or liquid)phase is the background phase and the solid phases are the dispersed phases. InEulerian approach (multi-fluid model), the above-mentioned system is considered as amixture of 3 continuamixture of 3 continua.
Gas phase
Solid phase 1
Gas phase
Solid phase 1
Solid phase 2
Solid phase 1
Solid phase 2
+ +1s
Gas flow
g2s
Applications in Dilute Systems: Comparison to Eulerian Models
G i tiGoverning equations• Conservation of mass for phase k:
kkkt
)()( u
Mass transfer to phase k from other phases
tk phase offraction volume:k
0,111
n
kk
n
kk
11 kk
• Conservation of momentum for phase k:
gFuuu kkkkkkk p )()()(
Transient term Convectiveterm
Stress withinphase k
Momentumtransfer between
gkkkkkkk pt
)()()(
term phase k phases
Applications in Dilute Systems: Comparison to Eulerian Models
S f th f b t h li t d b l D di th t t f h
MTWMDTDVMLpD FFFFFFFFF
• Some of the forces between phases are listed below. Depending on the state of phases
(gas, solid or liquid) the significance of each term varies.MTk
Wk
MDk
TDk
VMk
Lk
pk
Dkk FFFFFFFFF
- D: drag force
p: interfacial pressure force
- TD: turbulent diffusion force
- MD: mass diffusion force- p: interfacial pressure force
- L: lift force
- VM: virtual mass force
MD: mass diffusion force
- W: wall repulsion force
- MT: force due to mass transfer betweenphasesphases
Applications in Dilute Systems: Comparison to Eulerian ModelsWe investigated the solid-solid phases interaction using DEM:We investigated the solid solid phases interaction using DEM:
Red and black dots represent the particles of each phase. Initially, blackparticles are fixed and red ones move. Due to collisional drag, the momentumi t f d t th bl k his transferred to the black phase.
The overall view of the mixture
View of a control volumeinside the system
Applications in Dilute Systems:
The momentum transfer between the solid phases (F ) per unit volume can be also
Comparison to Eulerian ModelsThe momentum transfer between the solid phases (Fml) per unit volume can be alsocompared between the DEM model, and the theoretical prediction using data provided bythe DEM (Syamlal/DEM) and the multifluid Eulerian-Eulerian model (Syamlal/FLUENT).
Initial uniform random mixture
)(2)()8/2/)(1(3
)(
330
22
llmm
mllmlmlmml
mlmlml
ddgdde
I
I
vv
vvF
Syamlal/FLUENT
DEM
Syamlal/DEMy
Applications in Dilute Systems: Comparison to Eulerian Models
M d il b f d i f ll i bli iMore details can be found in our following publication:
Applications in Dilute Systems: Comparison to Eulerian Models
The collisional drag from a particle cloud on large particles is important in systems such asThe collisional drag from a particle cloud on large particles is important in systems such asbiomass. DEM simulations are used along with Eulerian simulations to study these forces.
Linking 1D Gas Flow to DEMLinking 1D Gas Flow to DEM
• Continuity:
011
iigi
ig uu
y
p
• Momentum:
11
1
1
1 )(1i
iii
ig
ii vxAppA
uu
Continuity cellMomentum cell
pi
pi+1Ai+1,ui+1
111
1 )( ig
iig
ii
i Mpp
ME
Ai,ui
80)1(3
8.0,)1(75.1)1(150
7.2
2
2
ii
igsp
gig
pi
i
i
vvC
vvdd
8.0,4 iigsg
pD vv
dC
1000R4301000ReRe,/)Re15.01(24 687.0
DC
1000Re,43.0D
Particle Reynolds number
Linking 1D Gas Flow to DEMLinking 1D Gas Flow to DEM
In SIMPLE algorithm, we create another formula for pressure correction:
**11
21221
1
2
)()()()()()(
igigi
ig
i
ig
ig
i
ig uup
EMA
pEM
AEM
Ap
EMA
In SIMPLE algorithm, we create another formula for pressure correction:
11 igigigig EMEMEMEM
Velocity updates are calculated once pressure correction terms are solved using TDMA:y p p g
ig pp
Auu
1* )(
ii
ig
ii
iiig
ii
ppA
uu
ppEM
uu
1*
11
11
)(
)(
The forces from gas on solidparticles are calculated as:
V
iiiiii
iiig
ii
pppppp
ppEM
**
1 )()( ig
s
iii
VpV vuF
Linking 1D Gas Flow to DEMLinking 1D Gas Flow to DEM
0.145m x 0.01mPo=110000 Pa
0.270GPaE1000N
mm5
d p
3m
40.0kg/m2500
0.33
e
kg/m205.1
kg/s025.03
gM
Pa.s1011.15 6
Other Lagrangian Methods: HardSphere (Disk) Model
V11ωAn event-driven algorithm:
• Dynamics of system is only governed by particle-particleinteractions.
V1
V2
• Particles are hard disks and they interact via binarycollisions. 2ω
k
• Collision times are calculated numerically as gravity and a constrained motion of the obstacle particles may exist.
Other Lagrangian Methods: HardSphere (Disk) Model
V’' V 11ω'
V’
V11ω
V 2
2'ω
V2
k
Pre collisional status
2
Post collisional status
2ω
Pre-collisional status Post-collisional status
pVVpVV 22'211
'1
dd
Post-collisional
ΓωωΓωω2
22
'2
1
11
'1 22 I
dI
dvelocities
)()( UU)()()()(
12221212222
12211112211
nUnUpnUnUp