Discourse dynamics and an emergent view of metaphor systematicity
description
Transcript of Discourse dynamics and an emergent view of metaphor systematicity
Discourse dynamics and an emergent view of metaphor systematicity
Lynne Cameron
Starting points Metaphor cannot be discretely analysed or
understood through its linguistic, cognitive, socio-cultural parts because language, thought and culture are inextricably intertwined.
A comprehensive theory of metaphor needs to combine different disciplinary perspectives to understand the total ecology of metaphor use.
Cognition and language use unfold continuously in real time.
A dynamical view of language use
Human language, thinking, action can best be understood as complex dynamical systems.
agents /elements of many different types relations among agents / elements of many
different types agents/ elements and relations among them
are always changing the environment is part of the system system is open
Change in complex dynamical systems
change can be continuous change can be sudden and dramatic –
self-organisation; phase shifts emergence of new patterns of behaviour
through phase shifts and self-organisation
across timescales and levels that are stabilities with degrees of
variability
A dynamical view of metaphor Metaphor performance is a ‘dynamic
ensemble’ that does not exist separately from embodied language use, cognition, feelings and emotions, socio-cultural influences.
It is not reducible to its linguistic, bodily, cognitive, affective, socio-cultural components, but is only explained by understanding how these components interact in real time = discourse dynamics
(in analogy with reaching, Thelen and Smith 1994, p. 279)
interacting timescales and levels
individuals in on-line discourse processing
microgenetic
individuals across time
individuals in on-line discourse processing
ontogenetic
the discourse event
mesogenetic
people as members of groups – across individuals
socio-cultural groups
groups across time
phylogenetic
Metaphor and Interacting scales in the dynamics of discourse
the individual
microgenetic
ontogenetic
phylogenetic
linguistic metaphor
the discourse event
systematic metaphor
socio-cultural groups
metaphoremeconceptual metaphorprimary metaphor
interacting scales and levels
different scales have different types of elements and relations among elements
therefore, need different types of investigation
but, show similar types of system dynamics adaptive change self-organisation and emergence
The phenomena of metaphor in the microgenetic moment:
process metaphor – metaphorically-processed language linguistic metaphor – language that has the potential for
metaphorical processing across a discourse event:
metaphor shifting systematic metaphor – set of connected linguistic metaphors
framing metaphors – around key idea or theme metaphor clusters interplay of metaphor, metonymy and other figures, literal language
at the socio-cultural, speech community level: metaphoreme conceptual metaphor primary metaphor
across socio-cultural history, phylogenetic: metaphors reflecting change in society etymological metaphor
the microgenetic scale
Neurological and physiological systems of language and cognitive resources in discourse context constrained by processing
capacity driven by intersubjectivity and
alterity
microgenetic metaphor process metaphor
empirical event evidence would be neurological or explicit
reference largely inaccessible from discourse data
linguistic metaphor operationalisation of theoretical construct evidence is lexical accessible from discourse data
The discourse event level
human systems, cognitive and linguistic resources, in interaction influenced by history, culture,
gender… directed by discourse purposes affected by immediate past and
future discourse
discourse event level: systematic metaphors
sets of connected linguistic metaphors, collected and labelled across discourse event(s) emergent groupings temporary stabilisations, open to
further change how to validate the psycholinguistic,
socio-cultural reality of these?
discourse event level: metaphor clusters in reconciliation conversations emerge
at scales of 5 intonation units and 20 intonation units
indicate possible critical points in discourse, where something difficult is being done interpersonally or ideationally
often involve interplay of several different metaphors
(Cameron & Stelma, 2004)
Clusters
of metaphors
Using statistical analysis and visual display (reported in Cameron & Stelma, 2004).
time
Cluster
Example cluster Pat ...(1.0) got a distorted picture of me.
perhaps, I don't know... I don't know.
Jo .. I think maybe they were just thinking,they wouldn't see a need to meet any of their victims.
Pat yeahyeah
Jo .. and so they ... therefore couldn't see why you would.Pat [hmh]Jo [and] I think it was more like that.Pat ... hmhJo and they could see,
... how from my healing journey,if I could build a bridge with you, that would ...(1.0) help me.but they couldn't see --... perhaps there was even a need for a journey.
the socio-cultural group level
multiple human systems in interaction in multiple discourse events constrained by group history, language
resources, values, conventions the emergence of metaphoremes –
bundles of stabilised (but flexible) features of affect, lexico-grammar, pragmatics
Now, I think that’s the trees.
You’ve got a visual memory of what you saw ...
Now to actually get your trees right,
what do you have to do?
Look out of the window at THESE trees ... to see
how the branches and twigs grow out of the tree,
and then go back to your memory
of the tree that you’re trying to draw.
Because that’s tended to,
to look like a lollipop hasn’t it?
When I was a very young teacher
and I kept saying to a little girl,
will you please stop doing lollipop trees,
and then I went to visit her home.
And all along the street …
the trees all looked like little lollipops …… moves to another student
That’s super…
The only thing that I’m going to criticise is ..
Louise to herself: Lollipop trees
(Cameron, 2003)
walk away from in conciliation talk(Cameron, 2007)
Extract 11425 Pat it was the republican movement,1426 it was the republican struggle.1427 Jo .. hmh1428 Pat that caused your pain.1429 but I can't walk away from the fact that it was --1430 ...(1.0) I was directly, 1431 Jo [hmh]1432 Pat [responsible] too for that.1433 Jo .. [[hmh]]1434 Pat [[I can't]] hide behind the --1435 you know the --1436 ... sort of,1437 the bigger picture.
Extract 2 2612 .. I was at a pretty low ebb.2613 ... and I was actually at that stage --2614 er,2615 ...(1.0) prepared to walk away from the struggle.2616 simply because I was --2617 er,2618 ...(1.0) what X --2619 totally fatigued and mentally drained.
Extract 3 2807 .. we thought,2808 they're never going to forgive.2809 ..(2.0) you know,2810 this is one job,2811 we'll not be able to walk away from.2812 and live a comfortable life again.
Extract 43295 that sense of --3296 er,3297 obligation to,3298 that you have to carry on.3299 ... you know,3300 you can't walk away from this.3301 ...(1.0) but there's --3302 there's so many republicans.3303 I know,3304 that are carrying that pain.3305 ...(1.0) and er it's --
Stabilities of form, content, affect
• used hypothetically to talk about action that could have been taken but wasn’t
• things that might have been walked away from were difficult, traumatic
• not walking away was the more difficult option
• verb not inflected• adverb (simply, never) adds to sense of
difficulty
socio-cultural group level: metaphoreme metaphoreme: …not walk away from…
an emergent stability with variability in the dynamics of the language
a bundle of stabilised features or preferences: lexico-grammatical, pragmatic, affective, cultural
emerges through self-organisation of systems from microgenetic to discourse event and / or socio-cultural group levels
evidence from discourse event and corpus(Cameron & Deignan, 2006)
socio-cultural group level: conceptual metaphor
conceptual metaphor theoretical construct fixed, stable mapping between
conceptual domains abstracted from language evidence
primary metaphor theoretical construct abstracted from conceptual metaphor
the phylogenetic scale
changes in social systems over time influenced by changing socio-cultural
factors, political change, technological innovation
reflected in language and ideas constrained by language and
conceptual frameworks paradigm shifts
phylogenetic metaphors
new metaphors for new situations emotional baggage
etymological metaphorsWhat then is truth? A mobile army of metaphors, metonymies, etc…which after long usage seem to a people fixed, canonical and binding.
Nietzsche
Metaphor and Interacting scales in the dynamics of discourse
the individual
microgenetic
ontogenetic
phylogenetic
linguistic metaphor
the discourse event
systematic metaphor
socio-cultural groups
metaphoremeconceptual metaphorprimary metaphor
metaphor performance in face-to-face spontaneous talk
socio-cultural group
discourse event
microgenetic
I’m trying to – I’m trying to put words to feelings,as they are coming to me,if you understand
Pat Magee, meeting with Jo Berry, 2000(Cameron, 2007)
talking-and-thinking ‘thinking for speaking’
a special kind of thinking carried out while speaking that is “intimately tied to language” (Slobin 1996: 75).
at the microgenetic level, the nature of the specific language influences how actions can be thought about while speaking
‘talking-and-thinking-in-interaction’ (Cameron 2003)
The dynamics of talk
language use is really a form of joint action. … It is the joint action that emerges when speakers and listeners – or writers and readers – perform their individual actions in coordination, as ensembles.
Clark, 1996: 3.
Talk as dialogic
The speaker breaks through the alien horizon of the listener, constructs his (sic) utterance on alien territory, against his, the listener’s, apperceptive background.
Bakhtin 1981: 282
The ‘system’ emerges from the dialogic dynamics of use
Language lives only in the dialogic interaction of those who make use of it.
Bakhtin 1984: 183
microgenetic ~ discourse event level metaphor shifting dynamics of linguistic metaphor fuzzy
boundaries; spreading metaphoricity; shifting exploiting the flexibility of the metaphor Vehicle
The introduction of Vehicle terms into the text seemed to create a kind of centrifugal cognitive force that opens up potentially endless links to other concepts … (Cameron, 2003: 191)
Vehicle re-deployment use same Vehicle with different Topic
Vehicle development repetition relexicalisation explication contrast
(Cameron, in press)
microgenetic ~ discourse event
interplay of metaphors, metonymy and literal language e.g. Vehicle literalisation through bridge terms
Jo ...(1.0) [and] I --and I saw very clearly....(1.0) that the -- .. the end of that journey,would be,.. sitting down and,... talking to the people who did it.
Pat: I’m sitting therebeside the woman whose father I have killedand at that time I was sitting in this wee kitchentalking to this woman for the first timewhose father’s dead
(Cameron, 2007) sitting down as potent metonymy for
meeting also with spaces, places, walking
A linguistic metaphor has a history and a future
Perpetrator (Pat) – conversation 1there’s always a price to pay for it. in terms of my humanitythere’s always a price to pay for decisions like that
Victim’s daughter (Jo) – conversation 2665 Jo [you] said that,666 ...(2.0) the price that er --667 ... you paid,668 for taking up violence,669 was part --670 ... partly losing some of your
humanity
The discourse event level dynamics of price to pay
the lexico-grammatical forms change as the conversations proceed:
Pat: a price to payPat: a price to payJo:the price that you paidPat: that’s always had a pricePat: you’re going to come face-to-face
with that pricePat: there’s a pricePat: but at what price?Pat: what price?
emerging systematic metaphor at discourse event level
the price to pay + the bottom line + put a line under the past+ there has to be some form of account
taken+ there’s no way of purging that debt
THE NEGATIVE EFFECT OF TAKING UP VIOLENCE IS A PRICE TO PAY
emergent metaphoreme at socio-cultural group level
price + pay metaphorical price + share, cut non-metaphorical price + high either
(Deignan 2005: 207)
constrains use at meso and micro scales
affects socio-cultural patterns
Metaphor analysis in a dynamical perspective identify scales and levels of discourse that are
contributing to your discourse data be clear about the particular metaphor
phenomena that you are looking for select methods to fit scales expect change, fluidity, variability and have
rigorous ways to deal with it be clear when you remove the dynamics look for emergence, self-organisation across
scales don’t expect reducibility across scales