Director, Office of Accountabilityschools.cms.k12.nc.us/communityhouseMS/Documents/CHMS SIP... ·...
Transcript of Director, Office of Accountabilityschools.cms.k12.nc.us/communityhouseMS/Documents/CHMS SIP... ·...
Director, Office of Accountability
School Improvement Plan
2015-2016 through 2016-2017
School Improvement Plans remain in effect for two years, but a School Leadership Team may amend as often as necessary or appropriate.
Community House Middle School Contact Information
School:
Community House Middle
Courier Number:
345
Address:
9500 Community House Road
Phone Number:
980-343-0689
Charlotte, NC 28277
Fax Number:
980-343-0691
Learning Community
South
School Website:
http://schools.cms.k12.nc.us/communityhouseMS
Principal:
Jamie W. Brooks
Learning Community Superintendent:
Kathy Elling
Community House Middle School Improvement Team Membership
From GS §115C-105.27: “The principal of each school, representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants assigned to the school building, and parents of children enrolled in the school shall constitute a school improvement team to develop a school improvement plan to improve student performance. Representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants shall be elected by their respective groups by secret ballot....Parents serving on school improvement teams shall reflect the racial and socioeconomic composition of the students enrolled in that school and shall not be members of the building-level staff.”
Committee Position
Name
Email Address
Date Elected
Principal
Jamie Brooks
Assistant Principal Representative
Ervin Neumann
Teacher Representative(s)
Jennifer Manning
Jenniferl.manning @cms.k12.nc.us
8/20/14
Caroline Buddo
8/20/16
Michele Baxley
8/20/16
Inst. Support Representative
Kelly Price
8/20/16
Parent Representative
Mark Schuhl
9/16/14
Parent Representative
Elayne Fassett
9/17/15
Parent Representative
Carrie Stoehr
9/16/14
Parent Representative
Rhonda Rivers
9/16/14
Parent Representative
Nancy Hammonds
9/21/16
Parent Representative
Kathleen Gantt
9/21/16
Parent Representative
Kathryn Alongi
9/21/16
Parent Representative
Janelle Clemons
9/21/16
Parent Representative
Scott Smith
9/16/14
Parent Representative
Dana White
9/21/16
Vision Statement
District: CMS provides all students the best education available anywhere, preparing every child to lead a rich and productive life.
School: Our Vision at CHMS is for all students to leave our doors with the necessary skills for college and career readiness
Mission Statement
District: The mission of CMS is to maximize academic achievement by every student in every school.
School: At Community House Middle School it is our mission to ensure high levels of learning for all students in a supportive, globally literate and equitable environment.
Community House Middle School Shared Beliefs
2016-2017 Community House Middle School Improvement Plan Report
·
2
· High student achievement is the main priority of the school.
· An effective school will have high expectations for all member s of the school community
· Teachers have a responsibility to challenge all students and to ensure that they believe in their own abilities
· A strong, positive, collaborative school culture is necessary for high student achievement
· Successful schools ensure that all interactions with students are positive and that all students are valued and treated equitably
· Equitable and equal are not synonymous
· Students learn best in student-centered classrooms
· Teachers at CHMS are responsible for the learning of all students at CHMS
· Developing, implementing and analyzing common assessments is crucial in ensuring consistent learning
· Rigorous academics, interdisciplinary instruction, integration of the arts, incorporation of technology and a program for character development are essentials for a sound, basic education.
· Beginning with the end in mind is the key to ensuring high levels of learning
Community House Middle School SMART Goals
· Provide a duty-free lunch period for every teacher on a daily basis.
· Provide duty-free instructional planning time for every teacher under G.S. 115C-105.27 and -301.1, with the goal of proving an average of at least five hours of planning time per week, to the maximum extent that the safety and proper supervision of students may allow during regular student contact hours.
· Provide a positive school climate, under CMS regulation JICK-R, by promoting a safe learning environment free of bullying and harassing behaviors.
· Close the reading achievement gap between SWD/Non-SWD by 5 percentage points as measured by state testing.
· Close the reading and math achievement gap between black/white and Hispanic/white students by 5 percentage points as measured by EOGs
Community House Middle School Assessment Data Snapshot Met-AMO Target Groups
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
Subgroup
Perf. Comp. Levels
3-4
Read
Math
Perf. Comp.
Levels
3-4-5
Read
Math
Perf. Comp.
Levels
3-4-5
Read
Math
Perf. Comp.
Levels
3-4-5
Read
Math
African-American
61.27
60.2 met
52.9 met
68.8
65.1 met
59.9 met
73.7
71.4 met
66.7 met
68.6
63.7 met
63.3 met
Asian
87.92
80.2 met
91.8 met
92.9
87.3 met
95.0 met
93.6
90.9 met
94.3 met
94.7 met
89.8 met
96.9 met
Hispanic
55.43
52.9 met
54.3 met
62.0
56.7 met
53.4 met
66.2
65.0 met
60.0 met
63.2
59.7 met
58.7 met
Multi-Racial
68.27
67.5 met
62.5 met
75.3
73.7 met
65.8 met
78.0
72.1 met
76.7 met
73.0
72.3 met
68.1 met
Native American
100
100 insuf.
100 Insuf.
100
100 insuf
100 insuf
100
100 insuf
100 insuf
71.4
66.7 insuf
66.7 insuf
White
82.55
78.9 met
80.7 met
87.6
84.3 met
85.6 met
90.3
88.8 met
87.3 met
88.3
85.2 met
86.6 met
LEP
32.5
20.0 met
38.3 met
45.8
31.7 met
42.9 met
41.7
26.8 met
46.3 met
33.3
17.6 met
41.2 met
SWD
15.98
8.3 met
13.9 met
21.9
22.2 met
19.2 met
29.7
27.0 not met
21.3 met
26.2 met
25.3 met
24.2 met
ED
53.61
52.3 met
49.3 met
57.6
53.1
49.8
68.8
67.6 met
61.9 met
64.7
59.9 met
59.9 met
EOG Total
75.88
73.9 met
75.4 met
81.6
79.1 met
79.8 met
85.0
84.1 met
82.8 met
82.3
80.0 met
81.7 met
EOC Total
100 met
100 met
100 met
100 met
99.7 met
99.7 met
100 met
100 met
Composite
77.42
Met
met
83.1
86.2
83.8
Community House Middle School Profile
School Profile
Community House Middle School (CHMS) was established in August 2005 as a fifth and sixth grade pre-middle school. There are 1785 students in grades six, seven, and eight, and it is the largest middle school in the Charlotte Mecklenburg School District. The school population continues to grow each school year. The school is separated into three grade level hallways and has a center corridor for the comprehensive fine arts program. In addition, there are ten mobile units that contain two or four core classrooms per grade level. Six teachers float between classrooms.
CHMS provides students with enrichment block to foster growth for all levels of students. There is also an elective program that provides structured interventions for students below grade level for reading and math. These courses are flexible and fluid, allowing for students to move in and out of them as needed. The state wellness initiative is supported by regularly scheduled classroom activities, weekly outside “teen time,” and brain breaks. Tutoring is provided by all teachers and there is a comprehensive website for school and teacher communications. Teachers are provided duty-free instructional planning four days a week with parent conferences built in as necessary each week. One planning day is designed for Tier One interventions, two days for department PLC meetings, and one for individual planning. Teachers have duty free lunch each day as counselors, administrators and security associates monitor the cafeteria.
The student population includes the following demographic percentages: White 56.4, African American 11.7, Asian 17.5, Hispanic 11.9, Multi-racial 2.3. Currently 5.6% of the enrollment is classified as students with disabilities, 2.7% as limited English proficiency, and 23.5% as gifted (TD/AIG).
CHMS “exceeded growth” with 33 of 33 target AMO met (annual measurable objectives) for the 2015-2016 school year. The school attained “exceeded growth” status or was an “honor school of excellence” during previous years. AMO or AYP subgroups have consistently met their goals. CHMS received an overall grade of “A” from the State.
CMS School Improvement Plan
Community House Middle 2016-2017
The CHMS principal is starting her ninth year at the school. There is continued emphasis on school improvement through content-based literacy and technology integration with an added focus on cultural proficiency this school year as the staff participates in the district’s pilot program. The outcomes and strategies in the SIP will focus on achievement and closing the gaps between targeted groups of students. The targeted growth goals were based on the achievement data for the current student population, previous growth data for the school, and the goals from the superintendent’s 2018 strategic plan.
18
*TENTATIVE* Revised Strategic Plan Goals
Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st century learning environment for every child to graduate career and college ready.
Focus Areas: College and Career Readiness, Academic Growth/High Academic Achievement, Access to Rigor,
Closing Achievement Gaps
Goal 2: Recruit, develop, and retain a premier workforce.
Focus Areas: Recruitment, Professional Development, Retention, New Career Pathways, Leadership Development
Goal 3: Cultivate partnerships with families, businesses, and faith-based or community organizations to provide a sustainable system of support and care for each child.
Focus Areas: Family Engagement, Communications, Partnership Development, Philanthropic Foundation
Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, customer service, and cultural competence.
Focus Areas: Physical Safety, Social and Emotional Health, High Engagement, Customer Service,
Cultural Competency
Goal 5: Optimize district performance and accountability by strengthening data use, processes and systems.
Focus Areas: Effective & Efficient Processes and Systems, Strategic Management of District Resources, Data
Integrity and Utilization, School Performance Improvement, Disproportionality
Goal 6: Inspire and nurture learning, creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship through the expansion of strategic school design.
Focus Areas: Learning everywhere, all the time, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Strategic School Design
SMART Goal (1):Duty Free Lunch for Teachers
Provide a duty-free lunch period for every teacher on a daily basis.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal Four – Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, cultural competency and customer service
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Social and Emotional Health (of staff)
Navigator Pathway:
· Enter Kindergarten ready
· Advanced Reading in K-2
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
· At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
· Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
· Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
· Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
N/A
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(Start—End)
· Interim Dates
1. Teachers will eat at the cafeteria tables with students for the first week of school in order to establish routines and structures
Teachers
N/A
Teachers
First week of school
Nov. 2016
Feb. 2017
2. Teachers will eat inside the cafeteria for a set period of time (at a designated adult table) until observation data indicates students consistently adhere to safety and procedural expectations
Teachers
With guidance students can recognize lunch routine, can identify correct table and can follow entry and exit patterns
N/A
Teachers
First three to four weeks of school
Nov. 2016
Feb. 2017
3. Once safety and order have been secured, teachers will drop students in the cafeteria and return for them at the close of the lunch block.
Assistant Principal
Students can independently use correct lunch lines and tables, successfully clean up after themselves and follow all cafeteria behavioral expectations
N/A
Teachers
Daily, beginning third to fourth week of school
Nov. 2016
Feb. 2017
4. Grade level counselor, academic counselor, grade level administrator, and SRO will actively monitor the cafeteria daily. Teachers will only be called upon should safety or order be compromised.
Principal
Noise levels and behavioral expectations are adhered to without incident
N/A
GL Counselor, GLA, SRO
Daily
SMART Goal (2): Duty Free Instructional Planning Time
Provide duty-free instructional planning time for every teacher under G.S. 115C-105.27 and -301.1, with the goal of proving an average of at least five hours of planning time per week, to the maximum extent that the safety and proper supervision of students may allow during regular student contact hours.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal One – Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Academic Growth/High Academic Achievement
Navigator Pathway:
· Enter Kindergarten ready
· Advanced Reading in K-2
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
X At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
· At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
X Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
· Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
· Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Teacher Survey Results
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(Start—End)
· Interim Dates
1.Establish a weekly planning schedule whereby four of the five 80 minute planning blocks are designated for various types of planning
Principal
Weekly calendar
N/A
Teachers
August – June
2.Strengthen PLC planning day with a PLC reset (add an instructional coach to all PLCs) and establish weekly Tier One planning time – provide training to all staff
Principal
Increase in teacher survey data on “planning structure is an effective use of my time” by 10 points
N/A
Teachers and Facilitators
August training and reset; Ongoing
3.Increase individual planning time
Principal
Increase in teacher survey data on “planning structure is an effective use of my time” by 10 points
N/A
Administrative team
August – June
SMART Goal (3): Anti-Bullying / Character Education
Provide a positive school climate, under CMS regulation JICK-R, by promoting a safe learning environment free of bullying and harassing behaviors.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal Four – Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, cultural competency and customer service.
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Physical Safety and Cultural Competency
Navigator Pathway:
· Enter Kindergarten ready
· Advanced Reading in K-2
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
· At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
· Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
· Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
· Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Student Survey Results
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(Start—End)
· Interim Dates
1. Bully Liaison / Bully-prevention
* Establish Cavalier Crusaders
* ContinueTeens and Technology sessions to educate parents on cyberbullying
Brett Mathew and Christy Babao
90%+ respond that they feel safe at school as reported on student survey
N/A
Counselor, club members, principal, parents
August – June
2. Character Education
* Implement Kind Campaign
Christy Babao
Andrea Mikels
90%+ respond that they feel safe at school as reported on student survey
N/A
Counselors and parents
August – June
3. Healthy Active Child 30 min.
* Weekly Teen Time
* Daily Brain Breaks in all classrooms
Erv Neumann
100% of students will report brain breaks being used in classroom per in-house survey
N/A
Teachers
August – June
4. School Health Team
Cathy Dugan and School Nurse
See attached plan
N/A
Team members
August – June
5. Participate in CMS Cultural Proficiency pilot program
Principal
CP Team
Dean of Culture
Improved survey results from all stakeholders; decrease in achievement gap
PTO to fund any necessities; Position exchange for Dean
Principal
Dean of Culture
Staff
IDIs and feedback sessions completed by Sept.; monthly CP in-house sessions
6. Hire a Dean of Culture - implement school-wide CP Program and Advocate for Every Child program
Chantelle Shorter
HR – position exchange
Principal; Dean of Culture
IDIs completed summer 2016; monthly CP workshops
SMART Goal (4):
Close the reading achievement gap between SWD/Non-SWD by 5 percentage points to 50 as measured by state testing.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal One – Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Closing Achievement Gaps
Navigator Pathway:
· Enter Kindergarten ready
· Advanced Reading in K-2
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
X At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
· At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
· Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
· Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
· Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
MAP Data and State Testing
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(Start—End)
· Interim Dates
Strategic Master Scheduling
· Enrichment/Flexible time for MTSS
· Strategic Scheduling to align teacher strength with co-taught SWD sections
Principal and Assistant Principal
Teachers
Increase in reading proficiency rates on state assessments
N/A
Principal and Assistant Principals
Parent input through IT
Summer 2016
Use of 1.5 ADMs for Literacy and Math Intervention Specialists
· Strategically identify students for additional reading and math support
Principal
Increase in ELL Reading proficiency and Math proficiency on state assessments
N/A
Joan Adams and Melissa LaBue
Ongoing
Position exchange
· Trade ADM position for an additional EC teacher
· Trade an ADM for additional EC Assistants
Principal
Increase in EC sub-group reading proficiency based on state testing
N/A
Principal
July – October
2016
Use of MAP data for targeted grouping and differentiated instruction
· Administer MAP tests in September and January
· Train teachers in MAP data disaggregation
· Provide1/2 planning day for targeted data-driven instructional planning
· Implement Compass Learning for targeted stud
AF and Math Facilitator
Ongoing increase in RIT scores for targeted sub-groups as measured by each MAP assessment and through AIMSWeb progress monitoring
N/A
All staff
September 2016
December 2016
March 2017
Continue content-area literacy
· Use of text in all classes
· Literacy component on all common assessments
· Reader’s Apprenticeship training for ILT
· Reader’s Apprenticeship training expansion
· Summer Reading and in-house PD on Notice and Note Non-Fiction
ILT
Ongoing increase in RIT scores and EOG data
N/A
Teachers
August 2016 – June 2017
SMART Goal (5):
Close the reading and math achievement gap between White students and Black/Hispanic students by 5 percentage points to 15 as measured by EOGs and EOCs.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal One - Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Closing Achievement Gaps
Navigator Pathway:
· Enter Kindergarten ready
· Advanced Reading in K-2
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
X At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
· At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
X Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
X Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
X Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
State testing
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(Start—End)
· Interim Dates
1. Strategic Master Scheduling
· Enrichment/Flexible time for RTI
· Use of value-added data to align teacher strength with co-taught ELL and SWD sections
· Open access to Honors
Principal and Assistant Principal
Teachers
Prinicpal
Increase in reading proficiency rates on state assessmen
Increased enrollment of targeted students in higher level courses
N/A
Principal and Assistant Principals
Parent decision making on course level
Summer 2016
2.Continue one preparation approach in mat hat all grade levels
· Allow for more focused planning and data analysis within 8th Math and Math I
Math Facilitator
Increased math scores in all sub-groups
N/A
Math teachers
August - June
3. Position exchange
· Trade ADM position for an additional EC teacher
· Trade an ADM for an additional EC Assistants
Principal
Increase in EC sub-group reading proficiency based on state testing
N/A
Principal
July – October 2016
4. Use of MAP data for targeted grouping and differentiated instruction
· Administer MAP tests in September and January
· Train teachers in MAP data disaggregation
· Provide planning day for targeted data-driven instructional planning
Facilitators and Academic Counselor
Ongoing increase in RIT scores for targeted sub-groups as measured by each MAP assessment and through AIMSWeb progress monitoring
N/A
All staff
September 2016
December 2016
March 2017
5. Expand Blended Learning approach with all math teachers
· Summer Reading assignment for math teachers
· In-house PD
· Use of Unit Maps
· Continual reflection and revisions as needed per data analysis
Math Facilitator
Ongoing increase in RIT scores as a result of lessons aligning to need
N/A
Math teachers
Summer 2016
Ongoing
6. Continue content-area literacy
· Use of text in all classes
· Literacy component on all common assessments
· Reader’s Apprenticeship training for additional teachers
· Academic Conversation training for Math department
ILT
Ongoing increase in RIT scores and EOG data
N/A
Teachers
August 2016 – June 2017
Execute a Mastery Grading Procedures Plan
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready.
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Focus Areas: Academic growth/high academic achievement
Navigator Pathway:
· Enter Kindergarten ready
· Advanced Reading in K-2
· At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
X At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
· At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
X Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
X Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
· Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Research on effective grading practices
Strategies
0. Train staff
0. Educate Parents
0. Monitor Implementation
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(Start—End)
· Interim Dates
Common assessments:
· Pre- and post- assessments created by PLCs aligned to objectives
PLC Leaders
Data from post assessments will demonstrate growth for all students
None
All teachers
August 2016 – June 2017
Data disaggregation:
· PLCs will use every Wednesday for data disaggregation and student work analysis
· Data trackers will be used in all core subject areas
PLC Leaders
Students will demonstrate mastery (79% or higher) on all unit formal assessments
Students will receive additional tutoring in Cavalier time
None
All teachers
Students – monitoring their own data trackers
Weekly Wednesday data/PLC meetings
Flexible grouping:
· Teachers will use data to tier lessons/flexibly group within all classrooms
· Tier One Teams will use Cavalier time to flexibly group students based on academic need
Tier One Team Leaders
Grade Level Administrators to monitor Cavalier time
Classroom assignments will be appropriately aligned to students’ academic needs
None
All teachers
Admin
August 2016 – June 2017
Additional learning opportunities:
· Each PLC will develop a relooping/reassessment plan to be approved by GLA
GLA and PLC Leaders
All students will be provided additional learning opportunities (based on the PLC plan) and additional opportunities to demonstrate mastery on learning goals
None
PLCs
Plan due to GLA by Sept. 2
Late and make-up work:
· PLCs will communicate their late work plan to students and parents
· Late work will be accepted for less credit in all classes
· Late work will be accepted up to the last day of the grading period
· A zero will be placed in the grade book to communicate to parents that the assignment has yet to be completed
· Teams will use Cavalier time and Teen time as extra opportunities for students to complete missing assignments
Team Leaders
PLC Leaders
GLA
All students will demonstrate mastery (79%) on unit learning goals
Reduction in no credit grades resulting in averages better aligned to student ability
None
All staff
Plan due to GLA by Sept. 2
Grade reporting:
· Grades will be posted in Power School within 10 calendar days of the assignments due date
Teachers
Improved home/school communication
None
All staff
August 2016 – June 2017
Community House Middle School - 600 Waiver Requests
Request for Waiver
1. Insert the waivers you are requesting
· Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size (grades 4-12) [required for all schools with grades 4-12]
2. Please identify the law, regulation or policy from which you are seeking an exemption.
· 115C-301 (c and d) Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size [required for all schools with grades 4-12]
3. Please state how the waiver will be used.
· Class size will be adjusted to address student individual instructional needs through flexible grouping of students in the most effective utilization of teaching teams. Maximum teaching load will be used to allow teachers in specific areas of the curriculum to teach students designated for specific skill needs and to address the large number of students requesting elective classes.
1. Please state how the waiver will promote achievement of performance goals.
· This waiver will allow more flexibility in grouping students to meet their abilities and needs and thus should enhance their achievement on the performance goals.
Approval of Plan
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Jamie Brooks
Assistant Principal Representative
Ervin Neumann
Teacher Representative
Jennifer Manning
Teacher Representative
Caroline Buddo
Teacher Representative
TBD
Teacher Representative
Michele Baxley
Inst. Support Representative
Kelly Price
Parent Representative
Mark Schuhl
Parent Representative
Elayne Fassett
Parent Representative
Carrie Stoehr
Parent Representative
Rhonda Rivers
Parent Representative
Nancy Hammonds
Parent Representative
Kathleen Gantt
Parent Representative
Kathryn Alongi
Parent Representative
Janelle Clemons
Parent Representative
Scott Smith
Parent Representative
Dana White
Quarter 2 Review
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Jamie Brooks
Assistant Principal Representative
Ervin Neumann
Teacher Representative
Jennifer Manning
Teacher Representative
Caroline Buddo
Teacher Representative
TBD
Teacher Representative
Michele Baxley
Inst. Support Representative
Kelly Price
Parent Representative
Mark Schuhl
Parent Representative
Elayne Fassett
Parent Representative
Carrie Stoehr
Parent Representative
Rhonda Rivers
Parent Representative
Nancy Hammonds
Parent Representative
Kathleen Gantt
Parent Representative
Kathryn Alongi
Parent Representative
Janelle Clemons
Parent Representative
Scott Smith
Parent Representative
Dana White
Quarter 3 Review
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Jamie Brooks
Assistant Principal Representative
Ervin Neumann
Teacher Representative
Jennifer Manning
Teacher Representative
Caroline Buddo
Teacher Representative
TBD
Teacher Representative
Michele Baxley
Inst. Support Representative
Kelly Price
Parent Representative
Mark Schuhl
Parent Representative
Elayne Fassett
Parent Representative
Carrie Stoehr
Parent Representative
Rhonda Rivers
Parent Representative
Nancy Hammonds
Parent Representative
Kathleen Gantt
Parent Representative
Kathryn Alongi
Parent Representative
Janelle Clemons
Parent Representative
Scott Smith
Parent Representative
Dana White
Quarter 4 Review
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Jamie Brooks
Assistant Principal Representative
Ervin Neumann
Teacher Representative
Jennifer Manning
Teacher Representative
Caroline Buddo
Teacher Representative
TBD
Teacher Representative
Michele Baxley
Inst. Support Representative
Kelly Price
Parent Representative
Mark Schuhl
Parent Representative
Elayne Fassett
Parent Representative
Carrie Stoehr
Parent Representative
Rhonda Rivers
Parent Representative
Nancy Hammonds
Parent Representative
Kathleen Gantt
Parent Representative
Kathryn Alongi
Parent Representative
Janelle Clemons
Parent Representative
Scott Smith
Parent Representative
Dana White
56708Community House
School Improvement Plan Annual Review
Tentative Due Date June 2017
2016-2017