DIGITAL MODELING EVALUATION ON TIDAL EFFECT OF THE …
Transcript of DIGITAL MODELING EVALUATION ON TIDAL EFFECT OF THE …
DIGITAL MODELING EVALUATION ON TIDAL EFFECT OF THE GALING
RIVER
AMIRUL JUWAIDY BIN OMAR
A thesis submitted in flulfiment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Civil Engineering
Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Resources
UniversitI Malaysia PAHANG
NOVEMBER, 2010
ABSTRACT
Galng River has been spotted by the Drainage and Irrigation of Department of Pahang
as one of the high potential area to be effected by flood. This river was chosen by the
state government for the "1 State 1 River" program. Flood is one of the main disasters
in this country it basically occurs at any reach of a river due to different factors. In the
14pstrcam area it i.stiai1y caused by the dischar ge which exceed bank flow and that
discharge cannot be sustained by river cross section and river bed. Whereas flood
occurs in estuary area is caused by the tidal influences. Analysis of the Galing River
was conducted using the Info Works RS (river simulation) program software. The
analysis is based on the rainfall and tidal data taken from the Drainage and Irrigation of
Department for Kuantan area and the cross section of the river. Scope of this study
included the location area, data input fOr, each event and water level simulation of the
river. The simulation were analysed in three conditions. In the first analysis, the
simulation is carried out at high and low tidal. In the second analysis, the simulation is
carried out at high tidal with 50 Affi and 100 ARI rainfall events. In the third analysis,
the simulation was carried out at high tidal with existing bridge. The results of the
simulation showed that flood occured at the downstream of the river during high tidal,
The recorded data at each chainage showed that the water levels increase as the flow
increases.
V
AUSTRAK
Sungai Galing telah dikenal pasti sebagai sungai yg bensiko tinggi untuk mengalami
rnasa!ah banjir oleh Jabatan Pengairan dan Sal!ran Negeri Pahang (JPS). Sungai mi juga
telah. cipiiih olçi negeri untuk progr .. "Satu Negeri Satu Sungai" yang telah
dijalankan di seluruh Malaysia. Banjir merupakan saiah satu bencana utarna di negara
ki. d:., bcncana mi sngkali ted a4i pada setiap ba .. agian s ngai disebbk2 oleh
faktor4aktor yang berbeza. Pada bahagian hulu .sungai, bencana banjir selalu teijadi
disebabkan oleh limpahan air yang terlafu besar sehingga melebihi kapasiti sungai.
Manakala pada bahagian hilir dan muara pula adalah disebabkan oleh kejadan pasang
surut taut. Permodelan Sungai Galing dianalisa menggunakan aplikasi perisian
Info:WorksRS. Analisa dijalankan b.e.rdasarkan inakhirnat data hujan dan pasang surut
air taut yang di • bit dari JPS dái' Atigkataii Tentera Laut Diraja. Skop kajian
rnerangkurni lokasi sungai, data maktumat dan simulasi aras air sungai. Analisa sungai
dikaji berdasaikan tiga keadaan yang berbezi Afialisis yang pert ma thelibatkan
permodelan sungai ketika aras laut pasang dan ketika .aras taut surut. Analisis yang
kedua nielibatkan permodelan sungai ketika aras laut pasang untuk purata ketebatan
hujan sç1urn4 50 taluin don purata kelebatan bujap: selinia 100 *aw, Analisis yang
ketiga puta metibatkan permodelan sungai ketika aras taut pasang serta kewujudan
janbata :sun gal Yang asaL Keputusan sinnilasi nnøde1an sungai menurjukkan banjir
bertaku pada kawasan blur sungai ketika kejadian air laut pasang. Hasil daripada
pemerhatian data yang direkodkan pada setiap rantal keratan rentas sunga
menunjukkan aras aIr ungai bertambah seiring dengan air limpahan.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
DESCRIPTION
PAGE
TITLE
I
DECLARATION
U
DEDICATION
111
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT
V
AESTRAX
A
LIST OF CONTENTS
VU
LIST OF FIGURES
x
LIST OF TABLES
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
xvi
1
1.1 introduction
1
12 Project Objectives
3
13 Significant of Study
3
1.4 Scope of the Study
4
1.5 Problem Statement
5
vii
2
3
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction 6
2.2 Conceptual study 9
2.2.1 Hydrological 9
2.2.2 Rainfall-runoff Relationship 10
2.23 Hydrograph 12
2.2.4 Tidal 13
2.3 Data of Analysis 18
2.3.1 The Rational for Seasonal Forecasting 18
(cQ1pgica1 Data 21
233 GIS and CAD 22
23.4 Urban Storm Water Management (MSMA) 23
2.4 River Analysis Method 24
2.4.1 Unit Hydrogniph (1111) Method 24
2.4.2 River Analysis Software 25
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction 28
3.2 Area of Study 30
3.3 Reference and Preliminary Study 30
3.4 Data Collection 31
34.1 Digital map 32
3.4.2 Cross section of the River 32
3.4.3 Hydrological Data i3
3.4.4 Tidal Data 38
3.4.5 Field Visit 39
3.5 Data Analysis 42
3.6 Discussion 50
viii
ix
4 RESULTS ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Introduction 51
4.2 Experimental Results 53
4.3 Types of Simulation 54
4.4 Analysis of Test Results 55
4.4.1 Graph of Flow and Stage Versus Time
for Low and High Tide Event
(Cases ia and lb) 55
4.4.2 Graph of Flow and Stage for
Rainfall Event with Different
Intensity, 5. 0 MU and 100 AR!
(Cases 2a and 2b) 60
4.4.3 Graph of Flow and Stage for
Network with Existing Bridge
(Case 3) 70
4.4.4 Proposed Flood Mitigation
Analysis at Dowifrcani 78
4.5 Discussion 81
5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusions 83
5.2 Recommendations 85
REFERENCES 86
APPENDICES 90
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO TITLE PAGE
1.1 Water Level Station 2
2.1 The location of Galing Rivçr, Kuantan 8
2.2 The Hydrological Cycle 9
Hydrograph
2.4 Definition Sketches of Common Types of Tides 15
2.5 Tidal Datumns and Tidal Levels 17
2.6 The Location of Rainfall Station in Pahang 20
2.7 Geographical Model Building over PIS and CAD 27
.1 Methodology of the Study 29
3.2 Example of Rainfall Data 33
3.3 Illustration of Galing River Catchment Area 34
3.4 The Soil Properties Of Galing River 40
3.5 Pollution of the River near the Housing Area 40
3.6 River Modeling Process 41
3.7 I.i.gi.tal Map of Galing River 4.
3.8 Event Type 43
3,9 Insert Historical Rainfall Data. 43
3.10 US SCS Event Data 44
3.11 Detail of Catchment 44
3.12 }1drograph Produced by InfóV orks RS 45
3.13 Output Window 45
3.14 Run Group 46
Steady Simulation 46
316 Unsteady Simulation 48
3.17 Produce Graph 49
318 Example of Graph 49
4.1 The Network of Galin g River 52
4.2 The Location of the Station along the River 53
4.3 Water Levels over Longitudinal Section of the River
During Low Tide Event 55
44 Water Levels over Longitudinal Section of the River
During High Tide Event 55
4.5a Graph of Flow and Stage versus Timç at
Station I (Downstream) 57
4.5b Graph of Flow and Stage versus Time at Station 2 57
4.5-c Graph of Flow and Stage versus Time at Station 3 (Middle) 58
4.5d Graph of Flow and Stage versus Time at Station 4 58
4,5e Graph of Flow and Stage versus, Time at (Upstream) 5
4.6a Water Level dining High Tide for 50 ARI 61
46b Water Level during High Tide for 100 AU 61
4.7a Graph of Flow versus Time for 50 ART (5 Stations) 62
4.7b Graph of Flow versus Time for 100 ART (5 Stations) 63
48a Graph of Stage versus Time for 50 MU (5Stations) 63
48b Graph of Stage versus Time for 100 AR! (5 Stations) 64
49a Graph of Stage versus Time for 50 AR! and 100 ART
at Downstream 65
4.9b Graph of Stage versus Time for 50 ART and 100 AR!
at near Downstream 65
xi
4.9c Graph Of Stage versus Time for 50 ART and 100 ART
near Upstream . 66
4.9d Graph of Stage versus Time for 50 ART and 100 AR! at
Upstream
4.1:0*1 Graph of Flow versus Time for 50 ARJ and 100 A].... at.
Downstream 67
4lOb Graph of Flow versus Time for 50 ART and 100 ARI
near Downstream 68
4.10c Graph of Plow versus Time for 50 ARI and 100 AR!
near Upstream 68
4.104 Graph of Flow versus Time for 50 ART and 100 ART
at Upstream 69
4.11 Water Levels during High Tide for a Network with
existing Bridge 70
4.12 The CrossectiOñ of the River and Bridge
(CH750 - CH800) 71
413a Graph of Flow versus Time for Network with existing
Bridge (5 stations) 72
4.13b Graph of Stage versus Time for Network with existiig
Bridge (5 Stations) 72
4.14a Graph of Stage versus Time for Network with
existing Bridge at Downstream 73
4.14b Graph of Stage versus Time for Network with
existing Bridge near Downstream 74
4.14c Graph of Stage versus Time for Network with
existing Bridge near Upstrea.m 74 4.14d Graph of Stage versus Time for Network with
existing Bridge at Upstream 75
xii
4.15a Graph of Flow versus Time for Network with
Existing Bridge at Downstream
4.15b Graph of Flow versus Time for Network with
existing Bridge near Downstream
4.15e Graph of Flow versus Time ibr wc,rk with
existing Bridge near Upstream
435d Graph of Flow versus Time for Network with
Existing Bridge at Upstream
4.16a Existing River Cross section at CII 100 and CII 150
416b Proposed Cross section of CH 100 and CH 10
br flood Mitigation
4.17 Longitudinal Section for Proposed Flood
Mitigation Program
75
77
79
80
81
XII!
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO TITLE PAGE
21 Runoff Factor for Rational equation 11
2.2 Recent Flood Event During Monsoon Season 19
3.1 information and Data Required 31
3.2 Semi4iurnal Constituent 38 3.3 Diurnal Constituent 39
3.4 Simulation Icon Explanation 47
4.1 Type of Analysis 54
4.2 50 ARI and 100 AR! Rainfall Data 60
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
NO ABBREVIATION
1 DID Department of Irrigation and Drainage
2 MPK Kuantan Municipal council
3 DSM Department of Survey and Mapping
4 MACRES Department Of Remote Sensing Malaysia
5 DOA Department of Agriculture
6 GIS Geographic Information System
7 CN Curve Number
8 1-1) One Dimensional
9 2-1) Two Dimensional
10 3.1) Three Dimensional
11 MSMA Mammal Saliran Mesra Alani
12 AIR.I Average Reoccurrences Intensity
13 OR Chainage
14 Q Flow Rate of Water m3/s)
Time of Concentration
16 Fc Conversion Factor
17 L Length of Flow Path from Catchment clevided
to outlet (km)
18 A Area Of the Catchment
19 S Slope of Stream Flow
20 1 Rainfall Intensity (mni/hr)
21 P Rainfall Depth (mm)
22 RI Average Rainfall Intensity for ARI
23 t Duration, time (lit, mm, see)
24 a, b, c, d Fitting Constant from IDF curie
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX NO TITLE PAGE
A Recorded Rainfall Data
B List Chainage of the Gaing River 93
C Cross. section of the Galing River 94
x
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Kuantan River is the main river that flow in the middle of Kuantan town Its
runs from Lembing River through Kuantan city before flowing out to South China Sea.
Galing River is one of major contributor to Kuantan River and covers the area from
Semambu, Bukit Sekilau and flowing out to Kuantan River at the end of Kampung Tok
Keratuat.
Galing River has been spotted by the Drainage and Irrigation of Department of
Pahang as one of the high potential area to be effected by flood. This river was chosen
by the state governnent for the "1 State 1 River" program. This river also being
classified as class IV for its pollution level This is due to the rapid developmentm the
basin area which is lead to many unfortunate events such as flooding, poor water quality,
lack of clean water, resources and erosion.
2
Galing River located near the Shore at the east coast of peninsular Malaysia.
Similar to the other places within this area, Galing River is also effected by the monsoon
season. This area receives a heavy rainfall during the monsoon season at the end of
November until December each year. Heavy rainfall causes the increasing of water
level at a low ground level surface along Galing river area. Figure 1.1 shown the water
level station monitored by the Department of Drainage and Irrigation Kuantan (DID) at
Galing River.
Base on the study conducted by the DID, there were three factors that contribute
to the flood event:
• Heavy rainfall (monsoon season)
• Tide (due to the location of Galing River which is near to South China Sea)
• River estuary
Analysis of the Galing River was conducted using the InfoWorks RS (river
simulation) program software. The analysis was based on the rainfall data taken from
the DID for Kuajitan area and the cross section of the river. Other geographical factors
of the river were also taken into consideration. At the end of the analysis, the best
solution in conducting the river management and flood mitigation were produced.
,7
, W4
Figure 1.1 Water Level Station
3
1.2 Project Objectives
The objectives of this study are:
L To develop a 2 dimensional model of the Galing River using the cross
section and the longitudinal section of the river
ii. To investigate the effect of rainfall and tidal to the flow of the river by
using river simUlation software (InfoWorks RS)
iii. To propose the suitable solution for future development of Galing River.
1.3 Significant of Study
The importance of the study are:
L The analysis of the Galing river using the real rainfall event can be used
for future river construction and mitigation program.
ii. The result will determine the cause of overflow for Galing river.
iii. Designation for flood mitigation can be determined in order to prevent
future flooding.
0
4
1.4 Scope of the Study
in oder to fulfill the objective of this study, there are three scopes of work that
need to be conducted:
I. Location
This study was carried out along the Galing River and at the river bank of
Kuantan River. Information about the status of Galing River is being carried out by the
DID Kuantan. interview session with local residents at the area along the Galing River
were be conducted to getmore information about the recent flood event.
II. Data
All the data required for the study and analysis were from the DID, Malaysian
Meteorological Department, Royal Malaysian Navy and Department of survey and
Mapping J1JPEM.
IlL Software
The analysis of the river was conducted using a very, integrated software solution
for simulating lows in rivers, in channels and on foodplains. The InfoWorks RS
software is very sophisticated program that allowed planners and engineers to carry out
fast and accurate modeling
5
1.5 Problem Statement
Water flows through the river is a bless as long as it maintain within the banks.
Problems only arise when flows overflow the banks and encroach into the river basins.
Flood is one of the main disasters in this country where it basically occurs at any reach
of a river due to different factors. In the upstream area it usually caused by the
discharge which exceed bank full flow and that discharge cannot be sustained by river
cross section and river, bed. Whereas flood occurs in estuary area is caused by the tidal
influences. However, at the middle stretch of the open channel the occurrence of flood is
more complex to explain because of the combination of both factors Flow scenarios
changes when water overflow the bank into the flood plain Flows in the flood plain will
change drastically to various types such as from sub pritical to supercritical or vice versa
or calm condition. The water also flows in various directions to find the lowest level.
The flowin flood plain will contribute or give a great impact to the overall flood
behavior in aspect of maximum flow or volume and thus directly influence the water
level. The present lack of research on open channel hydraulics under the Influence of
tidal may due to the limited data available such as water level and flow along the river
bed,
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE R_EVIEWS
2.1 Introduction
The hydrological analysis had become a must in a development area. One of the
main objectives in the hydrological analysis is to make sure that the development 'does
not give any bad influence to the catchment area.
Based oil the information given by the Dpa' : trent of Social Welfare (JKM)
Pahang state, the total victim from recent flood event in Pahang which is during (the end
of 2007 untIl the early of 2008) was about 4000 people and during (the end of 2008 until
the early of 2009) the total lof the victim was about 3200 people From these
information, the flood has causes serious damaged to the people and property in Pahang,
especially at Kuantan area.
7
Flood is one in many ways which human population interact with hydrological
systerL Water is one of the basic needs for human to survive. People need water for
drinking, washing and preparing meals every day, farmers need water to plant
vegetation, development and industry need water as a raw material and for cooling
agent, and river are use as a transportation network and transferring waste to the sea.
(Nigel Arnell,2002.)
Flooding in Pahang, especially at Kuantan River catchment are generally caused
by étrenié irécipitation during monsoon season, tidal baëkWater generate from the
South China Sea, high initial soil moisture and vegetation at the bottom of the river
bases Politician, the public and journalists have speculated that human activity may
also contribute to the severe of flood event in Kuantan river, The activity including
rapid devciopnient within catchment area, rubbish clumping and domestic waste from
commercial areas, housing, village, squners and other placements, waste poisons or
chemicals from industrial and sewage is
not treated properly, waste oil from the
workshop, waste from wet markets, restaurants and food premises and lastly, the
invasion reserves river with many activity contribute to the flooding phenomenon (R.
Singh, M.J. Helmers, W.G. Crumpton, D.W. Lemke, 2007).
For the purpose of the study, Galing River which is one of tributaries for
Kuantan River were chosen. The river is situated near the river bank of Kuantan River
and have a frequent flood event within its area. Figure 2.1 shown the location of the
Galing River.. The estimate size of the river basin Is 22.65km2 and the length of the river
is 7.2 km.(DID). This river also located at the core of development area in Kuantan city,
A flood forecasting system m- ay include all .or some of the following three sic
elements: (Yen-Ming Chiang , Kuo-Li Hsu , Fl-John Chang, Yang Hong ,Soroosh
Sorooshian, 2007).
(i) A rainfall forecasting model
(ii) A rainfall-runoff forecasting model
(iii) A flood routing model
The principle cause of flooding in most circumstances is prolonged or inten
rainfall. A proportion of the rainfall on a natural catchment will soak into the groui
raising the water table whilst the remainder finds its way into the streams and river, c
be defined as runoff. Normally, the percentage runoff in a storm will be range of 20%
450/6 of the incident rainfall but under exceptional circumstances this can rise to 70%
more (Peter Pollard, Michael Devlin, David Holloway, 2001). Thus the river fic
occurring immediately after a heavy rain will vary according to the recent rainf,
pattern and there may not be a direct correspondence between the frequency of ti
rainfall and the frequency of the flooding.
Flood takes the to flow along the river with water building up rapidly in ti
headwaters of the catchment but slowly in the downstream area. The speed of the fic
depend upon the river gradient, the shallower the gradient, the lower speed of the wat
For the downstream reaches of a major catchment, the arrival of the flood peak may 1
takes several days after the rainfall which caused the flood.
Figure 21 The Location of Galing River, Kuafttan (Google Earth, 2005)
2.2 Conceptual Study
2.2.1 Hydrological Cycle
Hydrology is an earth science. It is a combination of occurrence, distributioi
movement, and properties of water. A knowledge on hydrology is the key item I
manipulating and making decision in any problem where water involve. (Warre
Viessman, Jr, Gary L. Lewis, 2003)
A process where water is driven from the sea to the air to the land and back tF
sea is call hydrological cycle. As most of the water are in the ocean, it is best to assuni
that the cycle is started with the ocean. Then, water evaporate at the surface of tI
ocean. The amount of water evaporate varies, being greatest at near the equator, whei
solar radiation is more intense. Evaporated water is pure, because when it is carried ot
from the ocean the salt is left behind. The water vapor move to the atmosphere an
when the condition is suitable, water droplets is forming. These droplets then fall to Ui
land and becoming precipitation or may revaporize.(C.W Fetter, 2001). Figure 2.
shows the hydrologic cycles described in terms of six major elements, precipitatiol
infiltration, evaporation, transpiration, surface runoff and groundwater flow.
StO In MO.tn,..v.r Ind .. -
f Ef,...l.nd f
Figure 2.2 The Hydrological Cycle (C.W Fetter, 2001)
10
2.2.2 Rainfall runoff Relationship
Rainfall is precipitation consisting of water drops larger than 0.5 mm. It can be
classified as light rain when the intensity is smaller than 2.5 mm/h, moderate when it is
between 2.5 and 75 mm/h, and heavy when it exceeds 7.5 mm/h. (Wilfried
Brutsaert,2005)
After raining, the catchment urface area will he flowing with runoff. Runoff is
described as a water flow over a surface, where then it will become stream flow when it
reaches a defined channel. Rain falling on the watershed in an amount exceeding the
soil or vegetation uptake becomes surface runoff. During rainfall, water is continually
being abscb by the upper level of the soil after being intercept by vegetation within
evaporate at the same tine.
Many elements that Involve during the rainfall event making it very difficult to
predict the amount of runoff that will occur on the area involve There are many
structures that involve in the carrying surface runoff is design basis from the peak
runoff. So, the method or predicting the runoff is imp ornt 10 carry cut the lest
simulation and analysis. According to C.W. Fetter, the most simple way on predicting
the runoff is by applying the rational equation. This equation assumes that both the
rainfall rate and the rate of infiltration are constant. The rational method is very suitable
when used in analysis of small drainage basin of 200 ac (100 ha) or less. The equation Is
I Q=cIA
Where,
Q Peak runoff rate (L 3/ T; ft3Is or m3/s)
I Average râinfãll intensity (LIT; ftJs or mis)
A = Drainage area (Li; ft2 or m2)
C = Runoff coefficient
ii
Table 2.1 Runoff Factor for Rational equation (DID).
Description of Area C Business Downtown 030495 Neighborhood 0.50-0.70 Residential Single-family 0.30-0.50 Multiunits, detached 0.40-0.60 Mtiltiunits, attached 0.6070.75 Residential suburban 0.25-0.40 Apartment 0.50-0.70 Industrial
jglfl 0.50-0.80 Heavy 0.60-0.90 Parks, cemeteries 0.10-0.25 Playgrounds 0.20-0.35 Railroad yard 0.20-0.35 Unimproved 0.10-0.30 Character of surface Pavement Asphalt and concrete 0.70-0.95 Bricks 0.70485 Roof 035495 Lawns, sandy soil Flat, up to 2% grade 0.05410 Average, 2%-7% grade 0.10-0.15 Steep, over 7% 0.15-0.20 Lawns, heavy soil Fiat, up to 2% grade 013417 Average, 2%-7% grade 0.18-0.22 Steep, over 7% 0.25-0.35
Table 2.1 depicted the list of C value for different rate of infiltration. For each
type of land for the area, a range of the value of C is given. The lower number is used
for storms of a low intensity, storms with greater intensity will have proportionally more
runoff, justifying the use of a higher C factor. (DID)