Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives
-
Upload
cornelius-puschmann -
Category
Education
-
view
2.588 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives
![Page 1: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and
perspectives
Dr. des. Cornelius PuschmannHeinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf
European Summer School "Culture & Technology"University of Leipzig
29 July 2009
![Page 2: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
This is not a project presentation
…but a (subjective) overview of two emerging fields and their relation
![Page 3: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Providing context
● I am a postdoc researcher in English linguistics at the University of
Düsseldorf
● my to-date work has focused on what linguists usually call computer-
mediated communication or computer-mediated discourse analysis
(CMC/CMDA)
● I study pragmatic and discourse-related aspects of CMC (e.g. blogs,
Twitter)
● PhD thesis on stylistic variation in corporate weblogs
● additional background in information science and STS
● interested in digital methods, visualization and trends in the
Humanities research agenda
![Page 4: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Questions I'll address in this presentation
1) What is the relationship of Internet Research/Internet Studies and
Digital Humanities?
2) What kinds of questions are formulated in Internet Studies and in
what regards are they relevant to DH scholars?
3) How can the philologies benefit from participating in Internet
Studies and what methods and theoretical frameworks can they
contribute?
![Page 5: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Internet Research and Internet Studies
Internet StudiesInternet Research
“Internet research is the practice of using the Internet, especially the World Wide Web, for research.”
“Internet studies is a field of academia dealing with the interaction between the Internet and modern society, and the sociological and technological implications on one another.”
→ doing (academic) research via the Internet
→ doing research about the Internet
![Page 6: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Digital Humanities engenders Internet Research
Via practices such as...
● sharing rich digital resources (classical manuscripts, cultural
artifacts, 3D models of places)
● using web-based tools (visualization, annotation)
● integrating linked data (RDF-based mashups)
● employing new publishing practices (Open Access, Open Data,
academic blogging)
→ using the Internet is increasingly a social and collaborative activity
and academia is no exception
![Page 7: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Internet Studies as a distinct emerging field
● core fields: sociology, social psychology, ethnography
● additional fields: mass communication, political science, religion
studies, library and information science, linguistics, computational
linguistics, literary and cultural studies
● diverse landscape, but the core fields are larger and more strongly
involved
● disciplines traditionally invested into studying artefacts, technologies
and abstract concepts (books, mass media, language) must adjust
more significantly than those that study people and their behavior
![Page 8: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Topics in Internet Studies
● Internet architecture/security/technology (identity management,
encryption, spam, viruses)
● sociology of online worlds, communities and networks (SL, WoW, FB,
blogs)
● culture and conventions (netspeak, netiquette, video game culture)
● new forms of communication (chat, microblogging)
● digital rights (privacy, free speech, intellectual property, digital rights
management)
![Page 9: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Institutes, societies, journals
● Institutes: Oxford Internet Institute, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute
(IN3, Open University of Catalonia), Berkman Center for Internet and
Society (Harvard), Stanford Law School Center for Internet and
Society, Institute for Internet Studies (Tel Aviv), Singapore Internet
Research Centre
● Societies: Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR), German Society
for Online Research (DGOF)
● Journals: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC), First
Monday, Information, Communication and Society
● … and a number of others
![Page 10: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Preliminary observations
1) There is a strong bias towards
the Social Sciences in Internet
Studies
2) The philologies are not very
significantly represented
3) This is in spite of our natural
affinity for the kind of data – text –
that analysis of Internet
communication is based on
![Page 11: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A few reasons why we should study online communication
● in functionally-oriented linguistics there is no such thing as “too
much data” → Internet is huge
● Internet language data reflects a broad spectrum of speakers and
genres; in some regards “more natural” than other registers
● avenues of research for pragmatics, discourse analysis, applied ling.
● to study the creation, reception and criticism of (popular) culture on
the Web
● to evaluate the impact of techniques such as non-linear storytelling
(e.g. in fan fiction and blogs)
● but most importantly: it's about text!
![Page 12: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Internet Studies examples: Twitter
● Twitter (microblogging service)
shares properties of blog and chat
formats
● study by Honeycutt and Herring
(2009) describes topic drift in
threads of dyadic conversation
● coding and visualization of the
data via VisualDTA
![Page 13: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Internet Studies examples: use of hyperlinks in blogs
● research by Efimova and
Anjewierden explores link
structure in blogs
● typical: language data and
linking practices are not
correlated
![Page 14: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Internet Studies examples: self-linking in blogs
● different visualization techniques enable a panoramic view on the
content
● facilitates computational analyses of language on the Net (e.g. a
visual representation of Biber's multi-dimensional analysis model or
Csomay's Vocabulary-Based Discourse Unit)
![Page 15: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Interactive concordance of Barak Obama's inauguration speech
![Page 16: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Visualization of token frequency in Marriot on the Move blog
![Page 17: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Word frequencies in different registers
![Page 18: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusions
● philologists are largely missing from Internet Studies, though their
expertise is direly needed
● qualitative analysis and manual annotation is underexplored
● Internet communication not just another data source (though it can
be used in that way)
● new methods and visualizations needed
● application, refinement and development of theories
![Page 19: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thanks for listening!
![Page 20: Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and perspectives](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051817/54787960b4af9f69108b4ce0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Digital Humanities and Internet Research: shared methods and
perspectives
Dr. des. Cornelius PuschmannHeinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf
European Summer School "Culture & Technology"University of Leipzig
29 July 2009