Digital Healthcare - U.S. IP strategy

34
U.S. IP Strategy for Digital Healthcare

Transcript of Digital Healthcare - U.S. IP strategy

U.S. IP Strategy for Digital Healthcare

2

Digital Health Trend

Source: 2016: The Health Moonshot Movement (http://startuphealth.com/reports)

Digital Health Funding Snapshot

3

Top 10 Digital Health Deals of 2016

Source: 2016: The Health Moonshot Movement (http://startuphealth.com/reports)

DIGITAL HEALTHCARE

Software + Electronics + Mechanics

Biotech + Chemistry + Medicine

4

Digital Healthcare – IP Perspective

What is Digital Healthcare?

5

Tech Convergence – New IP Opportunities

Digital Healthcare

Genomics/Proteomics

Mechanical Sensors

Chemistry/Medicine

Health IT/Services

Software/ Apps

Big Data/Algorithm/

AI

Telehealth/Mobile/GPS

Medical Imaging

7

Wearable Forerunner – Fitbit

• 22.3 Million units sold

• 23.2 Million active users

• 2016 Revenue: $2.2 billion

• Wearable tech market share: 34%

US 8,818,753 – Methods and systems for processing social interactive data

US 9,198,604 – GPS power conservation using environmental data

US 9,196,964 – Hybrid piezoelectric device

US D749,002 (design) – WristbandHealth Tracker

8

Fitbit Patent Portfolio

9

Fitbit Patent Portfolio

Source: Mandi Gingerich et al, Fitbit

Alta Teardown, Chipworks 2016

(http://www.chipworks.com/about-

chipworks/overview/blog/fitbit-alta-

teardown)

• U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) litigation:

– Jawbone sued for Fitbit’s trade secret misappropriation.

– ITC: Fitbit did not misappropriate Jawbone's trade secrets.

• U.S. Federal Patent litigation:

– Fitbit sued for Jawbone’s patent infringement.

– Fitbit’s two patents are invalidated under §101 (patent eligible subject matter).

Fitbit v. Jawbone

10

Vs.

1. Freedom To Operate (FTO)

– Any potential infringement?

– Any risks to be sued?

2. Ownership & Transferability

– Owner of your IP?

3. Validity & Enforceability of IP

– Protect target product?

– Strong IP?

– Patent, Design Patent, Trademark, Trade Secret

Main IP Points to be Checked

11

• Investigation to determine if you infringe patents of others

• Expensive process but necessary for commercialization

Freedom To Operate (FTO)

12

• Keytruda: Merck’s cancer immunotherapy

• Annual sales: ~$700M

• Merck settles with BMS to pay $625M for past patent infringement.

• In addition, Merck pays royalty for future sales.

Patent Infringement Case

13

vs.

• Samsung Galaxy: Sued for utility and design patent & trade dress infringement

• Apple design patents: Round corner designs

• Damages: $1B $399M remanded $??

Design Infringement Case

14

vs.

• Oculus (Facebook): Sued for breach of non-disclosure agreement (NDA) and copyright infringement

• Damages: $500M (District Court, TX) for TM and copyright infringement

TM/Copyright/Trade Secret Case

15

• Source: PwC 2016 Patent Litigation Study (May 2016)

FTO - Patent Damages in U.S.

16

Source: http://ptopatenttrials.com/2012/05/20/uspto-post-grant-opposition-costs-a-forum-conveniens-for-

invalidity-disputes/

FTO – U.S. Litigation Costs

17

• Assess potential litigation risks in U.S.

• U.S. litigation is very expensive!

• Conduct FTO Search

– Conduct patent searches regularly

– Search competitors’ patents

• Monitor screened patents/applications

• Keep search/review record

– Patent search/review assessment

• Consult patent counsel

FTO – ID Infringement Risks

18

1. Who is owner of IP?

a) Determine true inventors – Assignment

b) Incorrect inventorship – enforceability?

2. Ownership Transfer - Assignment

– Check chain of title

– Review assignment recordation

– Tip: Obtain signatures as quickly as possible

3. Potential ownership leaks

– Collaboration, Government support, etc.

IP Ownership

19

1. Patent Exploitation in U.S.

a) Each joint owner can exploit without

permission of others

b) No duty to share royalties

2. Patent Enforcement in U.S.

a) All joint owners must join suit

b) Other owners can grant license

(circumvention)

Avoid Joint Ownership!

20

Three Stages of Patent Acquisition:

A. Invention and Prior Art Search

B. Patent Preparation

C. Patent Prosecution

Acquisition of Strong Patent

21

• Two possible approaches:

vs.

1. Alice and Mayo Decisions

2. Novelty

3. Non-obviousness

4. Written description/enablement

5. IDS practice (submission of prior art)

Acquisition of Strong Patent

22

• Anticipation and Obviousness– Collect prior art info

– Cross-check references

– Competitor’s patents and publications

• Section 101 Patent Eligibility – Alice, Mayo & Myriad cases

• Inequitable Conduct (Duty of Candor)– Cross-check related applications

– Review inventor publication files

• Enablement and Written Description

Patent Validity

23

U.S. Design Patent

24

Utility Patent Design Patent

Protects construction or function, not appearance

Protects appearance, not construction or function

Allows product to be marked patent pending

Allows product to be marked patent pending

20 years from the filing date 15 years from issuance

Usually harder to get and more expensive than a design patent

Usually easier to get and less expensive than a utility patent

Allows recovery of infringer’s profits

• Protection: The aesthetic appearance of a product

• Patent Term: 15 years from issuance

• No maintenance fees

Examples of Design Patents

25

Assay devices – D676,570 Reagent holders – D665,095

Appearance of pills – D437,407 Computer icon – D613,750

26

GUI & Animated Designs

• Nike: US D676,457 – Animated Design

• Apple: US D604,305, D675,639 & D704,212 – GUI

GUI & Animated Design

27

Display panel design – D736,250 Animated GUI – D457,164

Monitor display – D635,581 User interface – D725,662

• Trademark: Product/company name, app logo/icon, slogan, trade dress, app sound

Trademark

28

Examples of Trademark

29

3D configuration with color – Reg. 5,105,411

Orange color mark on exterior– Reg. 4,047,198

Gold color applied to images – Reg. 4,558,121

Blue curved stripe – Reg. 4,570,773

Copyright

30

• Copyright Protection

– Idea vs. Expression

– Registration: Not a condition of copyright protection1) Statutory damages, and

2) Attorneys’ fees

• Software Copyright Registration

– Deposit: First 25 and last 25 pages of source code

– Copyright Office Guideline: Copyright Registration for Computer Programs (https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ61.pdf)

Trade Secret

31

• Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”): April 2016

– Creates a civil/private cause of action for trade secret misappropriation

– Creates a federal cause of action for trade secret misappropriation

– Provides for jurisdiction by the federal courts

• Remedies:

– Damages, unjust enrichment, exemplary damages (up to 3X), attorney’s fees, seizure of trade secrets

Trade Secret

32

• Identify proprietary information that is vital to the business

• Identify obvious risk situations

• Implement a corporate policy regarding confidential information/trade secrets

• Confidentiality agreements (CDA’s) with employees – Non-compete provisions

Check non-conventional IP protection options

Check FTO issues regularly

Make sure ownership of your IP

Build strong IP portfolio

Take Home Message

33

Questions?

Kisuk Lee이기석

Patent Attorney (U.S./KR), PartnerHarness, Dickey & Pierce

+1-314-446-7670 – work+1-324-775-8771 – cell

[email protected]/ksluspat – IP blog

34