Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management...
-
Upload
cornelius-mathews -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management...
![Page 1: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact?
Stan J. LiebowitzSchool of Management
University of Texas at Dallas
Copyright Society Meetings
For Additional Details Go to http://www.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/intprop/main.htm
Or just google “Liebowitz”
![Page 2: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
How Much File-sharing Takes Place?
2004 Sales of songs (assumes 11 per CD) 759,383,333Webnoize 2001 1,000,000,000Idate high statement for all of 2003 5,000,000,000Idate low statement for all of 2003 1,000,000,000NPD for 2004 233,355,727
Estimates of monthly music files 'shared' in US
Plenty, according to estimates
As little as 1/3 the size of the legitimate market, as much as 6 times as large.
Large variation in estimates is disturbing, however.
![Page 3: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What has happened to Record Sales
Figure 1x: LP Albums Sold per capita
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Alb
um
s S
old
Per
Per
son
Predicted Sales (based on disp inc)
Actual Sales
Napster Begins
So far in 2005, down 8%
![Page 4: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Is file-sharing to blame?It is consistent with our theoretical expectations.
The timing of the two events is consistent with causation. It would be a remarkable coincidence if there were no relationship.
No other suggested factor is consistent with the decline
GDP – rose during period.
Price of CDs – virtually constant until 2004, when it fell.
Quality of music – no evidence of decline.
Alternative forms of entertainment (DVDs, video games and so forth) – these did not change in a way that could explain the decline in record sales.
![Page 5: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
No Change in Substitute Markets in the Period around 1999
Figure 2: Movies and VideoGames
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Normalized Videogame Revenue Per CapitaNormalized Box Office Per Capita
Source: Ebrain and MPAA
![Page 6: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Change in DVD market?Looks like this might be it.
Figure 4: Growth in Pre-Recorded Movie Sales and Rentals
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Real Per Capita $ Sales of PreRecorded Movies (right axis)
Source: Adams Media Research (2003$)
![Page 7: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sales Rose, but Rentals FellOverall, it can’t explain the CD decline
Figure 4: Growth in Pre-Recorded Movie Sales and Rentals
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
Real Per Capita $ on Sales and Rentals of PreRecorded MoviesReal Per Capita $ Sales of PreRecorded Movies (right axis)
Source: Adams Media Research (1983$)
![Page 8: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Doesn’t the uptick in 2004 Sales run counter to this hypothesis?
Figure 3: Measures of File-sharing Activity
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
March-May 2003 Jun-03 Nov-03 Feb-04 May-June-04
Pew SurveysComScore Media MetrixBhattacharjee et. al.Big Champagne
RIAA announces (June 25) and then begins lawsuits (September 8).
Increase occurred only during first six months.
File-sharing declined in the first six months, most likely due to RIAA lawsuits.
![Page 9: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Additional Evidence
Big Champage -4.4%ComScore -36.3%PEW -28.8%
Table 3: Estimated Change in File Sharing, first half of 2003 to first
half 2004
1. The aforementioned negative relationship between record sales and file-sharing in 2004 actually supports hypothesis.
2. Records stay on sales charts for a shorter period since file-sharing began. Consistent with substitution (harm) hypothesis, not with sampling. “Modeling Product Lifecycle on a Ranked List: An
Application to Music Albums on Billboard Charts” Bhattacharjee, Gopal, Lertwachara, Marsden.
![Page 10: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Additional EvidenceIt has been claimed (Oberholzer/Strumpf Grokster Amici
brief) that genres of music least likely to have been downloaded have shared in sales decline, which would be inconsistent with downloading causing the harm.
Although genre evidence is not terribly reliable, this claim is false (although I show sales relative to radio, same results hold just for sales).
classical jazz/smooth jazz country1999 8.07416 5.456752232 5.821572582000 6.979109 5.269958006 6.096209572001 8.414178 5.538243224 6.361193892002 8.590823 5.495995581 7.410973082003 10.55179 6.110928962 6.7954023
Table 5: Ratio of sales to radio listenership
![Page 11: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conclusion:
No reason to believe that the decline is due to anything but file-sharing.
Are record industry fortunes a precursor for movies and other digital industries?
I think the answer is likely to be “yes.” The small size of music files has made them the first impacted by file-sharing.
What about legitimate downloads and Apple’s iPod?Fairly trivial impact on sales so far. Most of the music on
iPods is not purchased from online stores such as iTunes.
These downloads are included in statistics already reported.
![Page 12: Digital File-Sharing: What Has Been/Will Be Its Impact? Stan J. Liebowitz School of Management University of Texas at Dallas Copyright Society Meetings.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649daa5503460f94a98f72/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Additional (Regression) Results • Blackburn (Harvard Dissertation) examines relationship between songs heavily
downloaded and CDs sales. Finds that popular CDs are badly hurt with large overall negative effect.
• Hong (Stanford dissertation): examines CD sales to families with and without Internet access. Concludes that file-sharing accounts for a large minority of sales decline.
• Liebowitz, examines how the share of Internet users in cities is related to changes in CD sales. Finds file-sharing decreases sales by large amount.
• Peitz and Waelbroeck: examine how Internet use in countries relates to changes in CD sales; find large decline from file sharing.
• Rob and Waldfogel: Analyze surveys of student. Conclude that file-sharing decreases sales (Each 2 downloads turn into a lost sale).
• Zentner (Chicago Dissertation): examine how Internet use in countries relates to changes in CD sales; also examines whether Internet use by individuals increases or decreases their purchases of CDs. Finds downloading is hurts sales.
• Oberholzer and Strumpf : examine relationship between songs heavily downloaded and CDs sales. File-sharing has either a zero or + impact, depending on which version you read.