Different Roles in Criminal Justice System
-
Upload
brenda-anderson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Different Roles in Criminal Justice System
-
7/27/2019 Different Roles in Criminal Justice System
1/4
Different Roles in Criminal Justice System
#1.Role of state and federal courts
Discuss the roles of the court systems and their objectives regarding public safety and civil
rights.
Understanding the role of courts
Discuss the concepts of justice and security. How do these concepts become a reality in a free
society based on a constitution and manifested through a complex legal system? How are these
principles reflected in the federal court system, including the U.S. District Court, the U.S. Courts
of Appeal, and the U.S. Supreme Court? What is the function of each of these courts and how is
their role connected to public safety and civil rights. How are state court systems designed and
what happens at each level? How does each level within the judicial system balance individual
rights with security issues?
The role of the court system is to determine whether or not a criminal defendant is guiltyof committing a crime in which they have been accused. The court system is designed to
give the criminal defendant an opportunity to defend themselves against any accusation
made by the state. The court is designed to ensure criminal defendants are punished for
the crimes they commit but not convicted for a crime they did not commit (Barnett,
2011). The court system is designed to ensure guilty offenders are removed from society
in order to improve public safety and secure dangerous threats. In a free society the rights
of the people and the remedies designed to protect these rights are necessary to secure the
freedoms guaranteed in the constitution. In order to protect the concept of a free society
the rights of the people are protected above all. This is reflected in the federal court
-
7/27/2019 Different Roles in Criminal Justice System
2/4
system through the necessity of having a grand jury and the ability of the criminal
defendant to appeal and guilty verdicts. The U.S. District Court, the U.S. Courts of
Appeal, and the U.S. Supreme Court act as a checks and balance on the actions of the
district court. The courts review the cases to ensure there are n mistakes or constitutional
violations.
Barnett, R. (2011). Pursuing Justice in a Free Society: Part Two-crime Prevention and the
Legal Order. Retrieved June 29, 2013 fromhttp://www.bu.edu/rbarnett/5crimjust30.html
#2.Law Enforcement Role
Describe the objectives of law enforcement organizations and contrast public safety and
individual rights issues.
Objectives of Law Enforcement and Corrections
Law enforcement organizations have a variety of objectives that in principle must support the
structure and functions of a free society based on constitutional mandates regarding individual
protections and rights. Those objectives must strike a meaningful balance between public safetyand civil rights if the underlying principles of a constitutional democracy are to be upheld.
Discuss the following:
Identify the objectives of federal, state, and local law enforcement.
Identify the objectives of federal and state probation, parole, and correctional
organizations.
Identify the objectives of the juvenile justice system and describe its relationship with
other agencies.
Law enforcement officers are public officials responsible for keeping society safe andidentifying and arresting criminal suspects in society. Law enforcement has a duty to
uphold the law and act ethically but they also have an obligation to protect the civil
liberties of criminal suspects in society. Police cannot search or seize the private property
http://www.bu.edu/rbarnett/5crimjust30.htmlhttp://www.bu.edu/rbarnett/5crimjust30.htmlhttp://www.bu.edu/rbarnett/5crimjust30.htmlhttp://www.bu.edu/rbarnett/5crimjust30.html -
7/27/2019 Different Roles in Criminal Justice System
3/4
of citizen and they cannot use excessive force when dealing with criminal suspects. If
police violate the civil liberties of the citizen the end result could be any evidence
obtained is excluded from the court process or the police officer and there department
could be sued. Police officer must apply discretion when going about their duties but this
discretion cannot exceed their obligation to protect the due process rights of the citizen.
Federal, state, and, local law enforcement all have the same objective which is to guard
the public, identify and investigate criminal offenders, and to make arrests. Local police
have jurisdiction over a specific area such as a city or county while state police have
jurisdiction over the entire state. The juvenile justice system is designed to rehabilitate
juveniles and not punishment them as in the adult criminal justice system. The police
have the discretion to take the juvenile home or to take them to the juvenile justice
system where they will then come under the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system.
#3.The rights of offenders
Balancing the rights of offenders
Consider this statement: It is necessary for the rights of offenders to be considered and protected
to a significant degree if the principles of a free, constitutional democracy are to be upheld.
Indicate whether you agree or disagree; then, justify and defend your position.
In a democratic society the goal is to ensure the people have a voice and the governmentnever comes oppressive. No matter how serious the situation or event civil liberties of the
citizen should never be imposed upon by the government. For every freedom taken away
by the government, the government becomes a little more oppressive. Civil liberties were
so important that the constitution almost did not happen without the delegates first
agreeing to the bill of rights or a list of guaranteed rights for every citizen (Curry, 2009).
While state rights were important for many individual liberties were much more
-
7/27/2019 Different Roles in Criminal Justice System
4/4
important in ensuring the government could not restrict the liberties and freedoms of the
citizen. When the rights of the offender are ignored then justice has also been ignored. It
is unfortunate that guilty offenders have to go free in order for criminal justice
professionals to obey the law but if there are no checks and balances in place what is to
stop the police from beating a suspect in order to get them to confess or a judge showing
bias to minority offenders. The right of the offender must be protected in order to ensure
justice is served and the people are never forced to live in an oppressive society.
Curry, L. (2009).The Government's Duty to Protect the Lives of its Citizens under the Due
Process Clause. Retrieved June 29, 2013 from
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/stateactionprotect.html
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/stateactionprotect.htmlhttp://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/stateactionprotect.htmlhttp://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/stateactionprotect.html