Diesel Passenger Car Technology for Low Emissions and CO2 ... · NZED: Integration of combustion,...
Transcript of Diesel Passenger Car Technology for Low Emissions and CO2 ... · NZED: Integration of combustion,...
www.ricardo.com© Ricardo plc 2009
Diesel Passenger Car Technology for Low Emissions and CO2
Compliance
DEER 2009
Brian Cooper
Ricardo plc
2© Ricardo plc 2009
Diesel engine technology will contribute to the fuel economy improvement of future US light duty vehicles
Cost effective reduction of legislated emissions (including CO2
) is a major issue. NOx control must not be a limiting factor to the long term success of Diesel engines
Promising ultra low NOx and NMHC emissions have been achieved through the integration of combustion, air and aftertreatment developments
New Diesel technology offers extremely low NOx potential and good fuel economy if key issues regarding robustness, aging and OBD can be successfully resolved
3© Ricardo plc 2009
Diesel engine technology will contribute to the fuel economy improvement of future US light duty vehicles
Cost effective reduction of legislated emissions (including CO2
) is a major issue. NOx control must not be a limiting factor to the long term success of Diesel engines
Promising ultra low NOx and NMHC emissions have been achieved through the integration of combustion, air and aftertreatment developments
New Diesel technology offers extremely low NOx potential and good fuel economy if key issues regarding robustness, aging and OBD can be successfully resolved
4© Ricardo plc 2009
LEV2 Diesel challenge
FTP-75 Drive Cycle Targets
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
NOx (g/mi)
NM
HC
(g/m
i)
Typical E4 engine out & tailpipe emissions
Typical E4 vehicle:engine out & tailpipe
emissionsAFTERTREATMENT
ENGINE OUT EMISSIONS
TYPI
CA
L E4
AFT
ERTR
EATM
ENT
T2B5 (120k)
~85% NOx reductionfrom ECT for T2B5
Fuel spec:-
45 Cetane index-
13 ppm S
5© Ricardo plc 2009
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
NOx (g/mi)
NM
HC
(g/m
i) SULEV Diesel challenge
ENGINE OUT EMISSIONS
T2B2 (120k)
T2B5 (120k)
>95% NOx reduction from ECT
High catalyst heating results in fuel and oil dilution penalties
Increased aftertreatment cost
FTP-75 Drive Cycle Targets~85% NOx reduction from ECT
Increased engine HC
Reduced exhaust temperature
AFTE
RTRE
ATM
ENT
ENGINE OUT EMISSIONS REDUCTION
AFTERTREATMENT
TYPI
CA
L E4
AFT
ERTR
EATM
ENT
6© Ricardo plc 2009
Diesel engine technology will contribute to the fuel economy improvement of future US light duty vehicles
Cost effective reduction of legislated emissions (including CO2
) is a major issue. NOx control must not be a limiting factor to the long term success of Diesel engines
Promising ultra low NOx and NMHC emissions have been achieved through the integration of combustion, air and aftertreatment developments
New Diesel technology offers extremely low NOx potential and good fuel economy if key issues regarding robustness, aging and OBD can be successfully resolved
7© Ricardo plc 2009
NZED: Integration of combustion, air and aftertreatment developments to target future emissions goals
3500 lb ITW Mid Size Passenger Car
6 speed conventional auto transmission
1.9 litre in line 4 cylinder DOHC 16v
Production 1600 bar 2nd
generation FIE
New two-stage series-sequential turbocharging and hybrid EGR system
Ricardo air/EGR path, combustion and aftertreatment control strategy
New integrated aftertreatment system (LNT + DPF)
8© Ricardo plc 2009
Benefits of air, EGR, combustion and control technology
NEW AIR, EGR & CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
IMPROVED POWER, TORQUE AND
TRANSIENT BOOST RESPONSE
HIGHLY PRE-MIXED COOL COMBUSTION
LOW CHARGE O2 CONC. LEAN COMBUSTION OPTIMISED TIMING
AVOID MISFIRE NO MODE SWITCHING CONTROL INLET TEMP.
ENABLE DOWNSPEEDING AND LOWER CO20.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0BMEP [MPa]
BS S
oot [
g/kW
h]
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Pre-
mix
Fac
tor [
%]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
EG
R R
ate
[%]
Euro 4Level 2Level 3
Pre-mix factor = [Ignition delay/ Injection duration] x 100
100% -
fully pre-mixed
2000 rev/min ExampleReference: 2009 Stuttgart
Symposium
ULTRA LOW NOx, LOW SOOT AND CO2
9© Ricardo plc 2009
The aftertreatment system has been integrated into the engine design to target SULEV NMHC compliance
Pre turbo catalysts for low NMOG
Small LNT due to low absolute NOx mass reduction required
All catalysts on hot side of engine
Increase in PGM (E4 to T2B2)–
Cost increase of $360 (based on PGM prices 22/7/09)
ExhaustManifold
2L
2.5L
0.6L PTC2
Zone CoatedDOC & LNT
ccDPF
HP VGT
LP VGT
0.1L PTC1
ExhaustManifold
VGT
λ
λ
NOx
TYPICALE4
NZED AFTERTREATMENTSYSTEM
~0.5LDOC
~2LDOC~2.5LcDPF
10© Ricardo plc 2009
FTP-75 temperatures with no forced heating strategy
Time [s]1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Exh
aust
Tem
ps [°
C]
050
100150200250300350400450500550
Exhaust Manifold PTC2 Inlet
Exh
aust
Tem
ps [°
C]
050
100150200250300350400450500550
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
veh02_818007_ftp75a_070709veh02_818007_ftp75b_070709
PTC1 light-off within 30sPTC2 light-off within 50s
600s soak
period
11© Ricardo plc 2009
FTP-75 temperatures with no forced heating strategy
Time [s]1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Exh
aust
Tem
ps [°
C]
050
100150200250300350400450500550
Exhaust Manifold PTC2 Inlet PTC2 Outlet
Exh
aust
Tem
ps [°
C]
050
100150200250300350400450500550
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
veh02_818007_ftp75a_070709veh02_818007_ftp75b_070709
600s soak
period
Exotherm over PTC2
12© Ricardo plc 2009
FTP-75 temperatures with no forced heating strategy
Time [s]1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Exh
aust
Tem
ps [°
C]
050
100150200250300350400450500550
Exhaust Manifold PTC2 Inlet PTC2 Outlet LNT Inlet
Exh
aust
Tem
ps [°
C]
050
100150200250300350400450500550
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
veh02_818007_ftp75a_070709veh02_818007_ftp75b_070709
600s soak
period
LNT temperature 200-300°C with no active heating strategy applied
14© Ricardo plc 2009
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
NOx (g/mi)
NM
HC
(g/m
i)
PTC
DOC/
LNT/
DPF
Typical E4 engine out & tailpipe emissions
Typical E4 vehicle:engine out & tailpipe
emissions TYPI
CA
L E4
AFT
ERTR
EATM
ENT
NZED FTP-75 Emissions Status
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08NOx (g/mi)
NM
HC
(g/m
i)
Tailpipe vehicle resultLNT regenerated during
pre-conditioning. No rich spikes applied
during FTP-75 testT2B2(120k)
T2B5(120k)
T2B3(120k)
New calibration optimised for lower NMHC in Phase 1
15© Ricardo plc 2009
94% tailpipe NOx reduction overall relative to typical E4: 76% from engine and additional 76% from LNT
Time [s]
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900Sp
eed
[kph
]
0306090
Cum
ulat
ive
NO
x [g
]
012345
NO
x M
ass
Flow
[g/s
]
0.0000.0050.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.040
Euro 4 Baseline Vehicle NZED Vehicle - Exhaust Manifold NZED Vehicle - Tailpipe
LNT 68%DeNOx
LNT 92%DeNOx
LNT 60%DeNOx
16© Ricardo plc 2009
Time [s]
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900Sp
eed
[kph
]
0306090
Cum
ulat
ive
NM
HC
[g]
03691215
NM
HC
Mas
s Fl
ow [g
/s]
0.0000.0050.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.040
NZED Vehicle - Exhaust Manifold NZED Vehicle - Tailpipe
99.6%
Exceptional aftertreatment performance is required to achieve SULEV levels of NMHC
17© Ricardo plc 2009
Catalysts subject to 8h oven aging at 800°C
PTC subject to 200h running test bed & vehicle
LNT/DPF subject to 30h running in vehicle
CVS dilution ratio reduced to improve accuracy
4-6 mg/mi tailpipe NMHC observed during repeat testing
FTP-75 - Phase 3
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.6
Engineout
Post PTC Post DPF
Hyd
roca
rbon
s (g
/mi)
FTP-75 - Phase 2
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.6
Engineout
Post PTC Post DPFH
ydro
carb
ons
(g/m
i)
NONMHC
NONMHC
52%
51%
FTP-75 - Phase 1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Engine out Post PTC Post DPF
Hyd
roca
rbon
s (g
/mi) CH4
NMHC
48%
96%
98%
FTP-75 - Combined
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.6
Engineout
Post PTC Post DPF
Hyd
roca
rbon
s (g
/mi) 99.6%51%
99%
NZED emissions presents challenges for measurement system capability
18© Ricardo plc 2009
Time [s]305 306 307 308 309 310
Tailp
ipe
CH
4 / N
MH
CM
ass
Flow
[g/s
]
0.000
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016 Calculated Lambda CH4 Mass Flow NMHC Mass Flow
Cal
cula
ted
Lam
bda
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Next step: application of rich spike to increase NOx conversion while minimising NMHC penalty
Low NMHC rich spike calibration
<1 mg/mi NMHCincrease per spike
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08NOx (g/mi)
NM
HC
(g/m
i)
T2B2(120k)
Next step: apply low HC rich spike strategy
T2B5(120k)
T2B3(120k)
Tailpipe result(No rich spikes)
19© Ricardo plc 2009
Diesel engine technology will contribute to the fuel economy improvement of future US light duty vehicles
Cost effective reduction of legislated emissions (including CO2
) is a major issue. NOx control must not be a limiting factor to the long term success of Diesel engines
Promising ultra low NOx and NMHC emissions have been achieved through the integration of combustion, air and aftertreatment developments
New Diesel technology offers extremely low NOx potential and good fuel economy if key issues regarding robustness, aging and OBD can be successfully resolved
20© Ricardo plc 2009
Cost Reduction
Integrated engine design
Optmised catalysts with reduced PGM loading
Decontent engine technology
Significant issues must be resolved for SULEV Diesel vehicles to become practical
Emissions Robustness
Low NOx DPF Regeneration
OBDUltra low NOx US06 threat
Source:
New combustion system
Catalyst durability development
Combustion control R&D
EGR system fouling research
O2 calibration optimisation
Application of exhaust fuel injection and fuel reforming technology
New control algorithms
New and improved sensors
Optimised aftertreatment strategy
SULEVDIESEL?
Time [s]0 100 200 300 400 500 600
LNT
Inle
t Tem
pera
ture
[°C
]
100
150
200
250
300
350
NZED strategy gives lowNOx and optimal LNT temp.
21© Ricardo plc 2009
20
25
30
35
40
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
FTP-75 NOx (g/mi)
Labe
l Fue
l Eco
nom
y (m
i/gal
)The NZED approach offers fuel economy benefits by improving efficiency and reducing aftertreatment heating
Production2L Turbo Gasoline
ECODIESEL
TECHNOLOGY
Potential Fuel Economy and Emissions
Typical E4 vehicle (with DPF)
Typical T2B5 position~5% FE penalty due to aftertreatment heating
22© Ricardo plc 2009
Cost effective reduction of legislated emissions (including CO2
) is a major issue. NOx control must not be a limiting factor to the long term success of Diesel engines
Promising ultra low NOx and NMHC emissions have been achieved through the integration of combustion, air and aftertreatment developments
New Diesel technology offers extremely low NOx potential and good fuel economy if key issues regarding robustness, aging and OBD can be successfully resolved
Diesel engine technology will contribute to the fuel economy improvement of future US light duty vehicles
DIESEL IS NOT ON THE MAT!