Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of...

11
Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding of uncertainties

Transcript of Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of...

Page 1: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

Didier Swingedouw

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement

France

Projections of the thermohaline

circulation in OAGCMs: toward

an understanding of

uncertainties

Page 2: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

Thermohaline circulation

THC : a system with complex feedbacks

Coupled with the atmosphere : an AOGCM is necessary

Uncertainty for the future

Page 3: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

Greenland melting impact on the THC

WIS2

CTRL

NIS2Scenario of CO2 doubling, stabilised during 430 ans

Temps

(années)

CO2

(ppm)

0 70 500

280

560

CTL

Scénario

Temps

(années)

CTRL

WIS2

NIS2Mean global Temperature

Snow

Land Ocean

Glacier

Two different IPSL-CM4 models: one with land-ice melting, the other without

Page 4: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

Impact of the THC on global warming after 500 years

NIS2 - CTRLWIS2 - CTRL

Années de simulation

WIS2

CTRL

NIS2

Page 5: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

Feedback quantification

E S0G

1

i

n

+-

THCTHC

t=0t=0Sans-CTL

Avec-CTL

THC

Glaciers1

1

i

i

ii

iwith

Density budget at the convection sites :

STTSTSResiduResiduSurfaceSurfaceTransportTransport

i

Page 6: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

-0,4

-0,2

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1 2

Main THC feedbacks

0.3)(1

1

TS

G

Dynamical gain of the THC system

S T

Climate system

Density flux ofTempérature

Density flux of salinity

THCe THCs

)( S

)( T

+-

Page 7: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

CNRS project : understanding THC uncertainties in IPCC projections

Apply feedback model to « water hosing » CMIP : quantification of differences in feedback processes among IPCC models

Comparison of models with ocean « observations » in transient phase :

Last decades Paleoclimate 8.2 event

Role played by atmospheric forcing and ocean resolution in scenarios

Page 8: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

ModelsModels

High resolution simulation of last decades (MERCATOR, DRAKKAR)

• Analysis of« water-hosing » = evaluate differences in ocean processes among IPCC models

• Coupling ice-sheet model GREMLINS with IPSL-CM4

• Simulation of paleoclimatic event 8.2.

ObservationsObservations

• OVIDE and RAPID section

• Paleoclimate record of 8.2 event

• Representation of existing processes (feedbacks …)

• Missing process : Greenland melting

• Paléoclimatical constrain on IPSL-CM4

• Dynamical constrain of last 50 years

• High resolution constrain on key sections

Uncertainty

2 years

Page 9: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

ModelsModels

ObservationsObservations

Uncertainty

• Atmospheric forcing uncertainty

• Ocean resolution impact

• Paleoclimate constrain for all IPCC models

• Climatic impact of THC

• NEMO with • 4 different atmospheric model• different oceanic resolution

• Analysis of PMIP2 database of 8.2 event

• OVIDE and RAPID section

• Paleoclimate record of 8.2 event

High resolution simulation of last decades

(MERCATOR, DRAKKAR)

4 years

Page 10: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

Conclusions

Better evaluation of: IPCC models against different observation

datasets Ice-sheet melting interaction with THC in

IPSL-CM4 Ocean resolution issues in coupled models

with NEMO Uncertainty related to atmospherical

forcing of NEMO

Page 11: Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding.

mailto: [email protected]

Thank you