Dicks Radar Copy

download Dicks Radar Copy

of 37

Transcript of Dicks Radar Copy

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    1/37

    Why We Need a CoastalWeather Radar

    Cliff MassDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences

    University of Washington

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    2/37

    Northwest Coastal Radar ProblemThe Pacific Northwest has the worst coastalradar coverage of any region of the lower 48-states.

    There is virtually no radar coverage for thelower atmosphere over the coastal zone andthe near-shore waters.It is particularly disturbing that such poor coverage exists for a region of often intensestorms AND a great deal of military,shipping, fishing and other marine traffic.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    3/37

    Weather Radar 101

    Modern weather radars can see where it is precipitatingDoppler radars can also get the air velocityRadars can track storms, fronts, and other major featuresCan tell how much rain is falling over a broadareaincluding mountain slopes.An essential tool for the National Weather Serviceand other meteorologists.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    4/37

    When Hurricane KatrinaApproached the Gulf Coast

    Radar Clearly Showed the Threat

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    5/37

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    6/37

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    7/37

    The Problem

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    8/37

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    9/37

    The rightdiagramindicates theeffectivecoverage of theWeather Service radars(at 3-km,above meansea level), withhatchingindicatingsubstantial

    blockage.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    10/37

    Radar coverage for thelowest beam (.5 degreeelevation angle) for the

    current network. Redareas indicate nocoverage below 8000 m(25,000 ft). Radar

    coverage calculations byKen Westrick

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    11/37

    NO C overage Below 25,000 f t

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    12/37

    The Implications of Poor Coastal

    Radar CoverageNorthwest forecasters often have a poor ideaof the structure of weather systems

    approaching the area. There have been several major forecast failures in

    the 0-24 h range that could have been mitigated if coastal radar coverage was better.

    The ability to provide short-term forecasts(nowcasting) over western Oregon andWashington is greatly lessened.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    13/37

    F ebruary 7, 2002

    On the morning of 7F ebruary 2002 anintense low center moved into the central

    Oregon coast, withabsolutely no warnings by the NationalWeather Service.Produced strong winds

    with gusts exceeding70 mph

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    14/37

    A surprise storm insouthern Oregon on

    F ebruary 7, 2002 causedmassive tree falls and

    damage

    NO WARNINGS!!

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    15/37

    The Implications of Poor Coastal Radar Coverage

    With no low level Doppler wind andreflectivity from radar, critical warnings andweather guidance over the coastal zone aredegraded. No assistance for emergencysituations, pollutant spills, and the like.

    When the New Carisa

    grounded Near CoosBay, Oregon, therewas no radar coverageto help manage salvageoperations.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    16/37

    The Implications of Poor Coastal Radar

    CoverageThere is no radar coverage of the heavyorographic precipitation on the western and

    southern sides of the Olympics and coastalmountains.thus, degrading flood and river forecasting.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    17/37

    The Implications of Poor Coastal Radar

    CoverageThere is a distinct lack of weather dataoffshore for use in initializing weather

    prediction models along and off the coast.A coastal radar would provide bothDoppler winds and reflectivities (where it israining) that could be assimilated into themodels. Without such radars, future short-term forecast skill of weather featuresapproaching our coast will be limited.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    18/37

    We Do Get Hurricane StrengthStorms

    Major storms do occur here in the NW andwithout coastal radars we can not determinethe structure and position as well as weshould

    Example: Columbus Day Storm of 1962:Winds Exceeded 150 mph in places withcatastrophic damage

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    19/37

    1921 Olympic Blow Down Storm

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    20/37

    An Extraordinary EventHurricane-F orce Winds Struck the EntireWashington Coast At North Head sustained (5 minute average)

    winds reached 126 mph, with a maximum one-minute wind of 150 mph before the sensor failed.

    At Tatoosh Island, 150 miles to the north, winds

    reached 110 mph. At Astoria, on the south side of the Columbia,there were unofficial reports of gusts to 130mph.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    21/37

    An Extraordinary Event

    It was estimated that 80% of the mature timber near North Head was razed during this storm and7-8 BILLION board feet of timber was downedover coastal Washington eight times that blowndown by Mt. St. Helens, and roughly the entirecurrent annual harvest for the entire Pacific

    Northwest today.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    22/37

    As a result, this event has become known as theThe O lympic B lowdown S torm

    In some areas over 40% of the trees were blown down

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    23/37

    The Most Extreme Northwest Windstorm: TheColumbus Day Windstorm of 12 October 1962

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    24/37

    The Big OneThe Columbus Day Storm was the most damaging

    windstorm to strike the Pacific Northwest in 150 years.An extensive area, stretching from northern California to

    southern British Columbia experienced hurricane-forcewinds, massive treefalls, and power outages.In Oregon and Washington, 46 died and 317 requiredhospitalization as a result of the storm.F ifteen billion board feet of timber worth 750 million $ weredowned, 53,000 homes were damaged, thousands of utility

    poles were toppled, part of the roof of Portlands Multnomahstadium was torn off, and the twin 520 ft steel towers thatcarried the main power lines of Portland were crumpled.At the height of the storm approximately one million homeswere without power in the two states, and total damage wasconservatively estimated at a quarter of a billion (1962)dollars.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    25/37

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    26/37

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    27/37

    Columbus Day 1962: At Cape Blanco there were150 mph with gusts to 179! Strongest winds on

    bluffs and windward slopes of coastal orography

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    28/37

    F eb. 13, 1979: Winds over 100 kts destroyed the Hood Canal BridgeCost to replace: over 100 million dollars

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    29/37

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    30/37

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    31/37

    F ebruary13

    1979:TheHoodCanalStorm

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    32/37

    The Solution: Acquisition of Additional Coastal Radars

    By adding one or two coastal radars, the National Weather Service could greatlyimprove the current situation.Although the NWS radar (WSR-88D)production line is now closed, Enterprise

    Electronics has a similar (if not better) product available (DWSR-8501S/K).Cost: Approximately $ 4.5 million per radar,

    plus installation costs and maintenance.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    33/37

    EnterpriseDWSR-8501S/K Doppler Radar.The National

    Weather Servicehas already

    purchased two

    of these to fill intheir radar network.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    34/37

    Now With Two New Radars

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    35/37

    Acquisition of Additional Coastal Radars

    Ideally two radars would be acquired withone positioned on the central WA coast (e.g.,Westport) and the other on the centralOregon coast ( F lorence)If we could secure only one, Westport would

    be the best choicesince it provides

    coverage of entrances to both the ColumbiaRiver and the Strait.

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    36/37

    F or More Information Check the Web Site

    http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~cliff/coastalradar.html

  • 8/3/2019 Dicks Radar Copy

    37/37

    None70%

    Partial

    7%

    Full23%

    Coverage over the Pacific Northwest at or below 2-km:Where the real weather is!