Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! Harris …kagan/talks_info/IWORID04/...Diamond...
Transcript of Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! Harris …kagan/talks_info/IWORID04/...Diamond...
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever!
Harris KaganOhio State University
IWORID 2004July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Outline of the Talk
• Introduction to Diamond
• Recent Results
• Applications
• Summary
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 1) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Introduction
Motivation: Tracking Devices Close to Interaction Region of Experiments
Use at the LHC/SLHC (or similar environments e.g. BaBar, Belle):→ Inner tracking layers must provide high precision tracking (to tag b, t, Higgs, . . . )
→ Inner tracking layers must survive! → what does one do?
→ Annual replacement of inner layers perhaps?
Look for a Material with Certain Properties:• Radiation hardness (no frequent replacements)
• Low dielectric constant → low capacitance
• Low leakage current → low readout noise
• Room temperature operation, Fast signal collection time → no cooling
Material Presented Here:• Polycrystalline Chemical Vapor Deposition (pCVD) Diamond
• Single Crystal Chemical Vapor Deposition (scCVD) Diamond
On Behalf of RD42:• Reference → http://rd42.web.cern.ch/RD42
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 2) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Introduction
Comparison of Various Materials
Property Diamond 4H-SiC Si
Band Gap [eV] 5.5 3.3 1.12Breakdown field [V/cm] 107 4×106 3×105
Resistivity [Ω-cm] > 1011 1011 2.3×105
Intrinsic Carrier Density [cm−3] < 103 1.5×1010
Electron Mobility [cm2V−1s−1] 1800 800 1350Hole Mobility [cm2V−1s−1] 1200 115 480Saturation Velocity [km/s] 220 200 82
Mass Density [g cm−3] 3.52 3.21 2.33Atomic Charge 6 14/6 14Dielectric Constant 5.7 9.7 11.9Displacement Energy [eV/atom] 43 25 13-20
Energy to create e-h pair [eV] 13 8.4 3.6Radiation Length [cm] 12.2 8.7 9.4Spec. Ionization Loss [MeV/cm] 4.69 4.28 3.21Ave. Signal Created/100 µm [e] 3600 5100 8900Ave. Signal Created/0.1% X0 [e] 4400 4400 8400
→ Low dielectric constant - low capacitance→ Large bandgap - low leakage current→ Large energy to create an eh pair - small signal
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 3) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond
Diamond Growth:
Micro-Wave Reactor Schematic Edge View of pCVD diamond
(Courtesy of Element Six)
• Diamonds are “synthesized” from a plasma
• The diamond “copies” the substrate
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 4) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond
Characterization of Diamond:
Signal formation
e-h Creation
Charged Particle
Electrodes
Diamond
Vbias
Amplifier
• Q=dtQ0 where d = collection distance = distance e-h pair move apart
• d=(µeτe + µhτh)E
• d=µEτ
with µ = µe + µh
and τ = µeτe+µhτh
µe+µh
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 5) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond
Diamond Properties:
Signal formation
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1 10 102
Signal versus applied electric field
0
5 0
100
150
200
250
0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 1 .20
2000
4000
6000
8000
Col
lect
ion
Dis
tanc
e ( µ
m)
Electric Field (V/µm)
Mean C
harge (e)
• Contacts on both sides - structures from µm to cm
• Contacts typically: Cr/Au or Ti/Au or Ti/W → non-carbide formers
• Polycrystalline CVD diamond typically “pumps” by a factor of 1.5-1.8
• Usually operate at 1V/µm → drift velocity saturated
• Test Procedure: dot → strip → pixel on same diamond!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 6) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond
Recent polycrystalline CVD (pCVD) diamond.
(Courtesy of Element Six)
Left: Enhanced surface of pCVD diamondRight: Recent pCVD wafer ready for test - Dots are 1 cm apart
Wafers can be grown >12 cm diameter, >2 mm thickness.
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 7) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond
In 2000 RD42 entered into a Research Program with Element Six to increasethe charge collected from pCVD diamond.
Research Program Diamond Measured with a 90Sr Source:
• System Gain = 124 e/mV• QMP = 7600e (62mV)• Mean Charge = 9800e (79mV)
• Source data well separated from 0• Collection Distance now 275µm• Most Probable Charge now ≈ 8000e• 99% of PH distribution now above3000e
• FWHM/MP ≈ 0.95 — Si has ≈ 0.5• This diamond available in large sizes
The Research program worked!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 8) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond
History of Diamond Progress
*
*Charge Collection in DeBeers CVD Diamond
0
100
200
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
RD42 Goal
Time (year)
Co
llect
ion
Dis
tan
ce (
mic
ron
s)
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 9) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond - Tracking Studies
Diamond Tracking Planes:
Photo of Two Diamond Tracking Planes PH Distribution on each Strip
channel number [ ]0 20 40 60 80 100 120
sig
nal
ch
arg
e, t
wo
str
ips
[e]
-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000CDS-90
mean values on channels
Diamond Tracker CDS-90, Signal Charge on Strips
• Use same electronics as Silicon• Uniform signals on all strips → new metalisation• Pedestal separated from “0” on all strips• 99% of entries above 2000 e• Mean signal charge ∼ 8640 e → new metalisation• MP signal charge ∼ 6500 e
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 10) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Radiation Hardness Studies with Trackers
Proton Irradiation Studies with Trackers:
Signal to Noise
2 strip transparent signal to single strip noise [ ]0 50 100 150 200 250
entr
ies/
bin
[1/
100]
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800before irradiation
mean 57, most prob. 41FWHM 54
after 1 E15 protons/cm2
mean 49, most prob. 35FWHM 41
Diamond CDS-69 at 0.9 V/µm
after 2.2 E 15 protons/cm2
and re-metalizationmean 47, most prob. 35FWHM 36
Signal from Irradiated Diamond Tracker
• Dark current decreases with fluence• S/N decreases at 2× 1015/cm2
• Resolution improves at 2× 1015/cm2
Resolution
entr
ies/
2µm
[ ]
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Residual Distributions, Proton Irradiated Diamond
Diamond CDS-69
before irradiationσ = 11.5 µm
2-strip center ofgravity method
0
200
400
600
800
1000
CDS-69
after 1E15 p/cm2
σ = 9.1 µm
residual, uh-ut, [µm]-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
CDS-69
after 2.2 E 15 p/cm2
and re-metalization
σ = 7.4 µm
Irradiation to 1016 protons/cm2 presently underway!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 11) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Radiation Hardness Studies with Trackers
Pion Irradiation Studies with Trackers:
Signal to Noise
2-strip transparent signal to single strip noise [ ]0 50 100 150 200 250
entr
ies
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
CDS-38 at 0.6 V/µmbefore irradiation
mean 66most prob. 44FWHM 58
cm2⁄after 2.9 E 15 π
mean 28
and re-metalization
most prob. 21FWHM 27
Signal Distributions from Diamond Tracker
Resolution
entr
ies/
2µm
0
50
100
150
200
250CDS-38before irradiation
σ = 13.7 µm
2-strip center of gravity
method
Residual Distributions in Diamond Tracker
residual, uh-ut [µm]-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
entr
ies/
2µm
0
50
100
150
200
250
300CDS-38
cm2⁄after 2.9 E 15 π
σ = 10.6 µm
and re-metalization
2-strip center of gravitymethod
• Dark current decreases with fluence
• 50% loss of S/N at 2.9× 1015/cm2
• Resolution improves 25% at 2.9× 1015/cm2
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 12) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond - Tracking Studies
Radiation Hard Diamond Tracking Modules:
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
htempNent = 37904 Mean = 50.2RMS = 16.38
max abs(tim-346)<2 && sig<170 htempNent = 37904 Mean = 50.2RMS = 16.38
• Large (2cm × 4cm) Module constructed with new metalisation
• Fully radiation hard SCTA128 electronics → 25ns peaking time
• Tested in a 90Sr → ready for beam test and irradiation
• Charge distribution cleanly separated from the noise tail → S/N > 8/1
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 13) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
New Type of CVD Diamond: Single Crystal CVD Diamond
Could we make a CVD diamond with improved characteristics?
• Remove the grain boundaries, defects, charge trapping etc.• Lower operating voltage.• Eliminate pumping.
This is single crystal CVD (scCVD) diamond: [Isberg et al., Science 297 (2002) 1670].
CD135 - Both Sides - Pumped (Sr-90 source)
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Signal Size (Electrons)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Num
ber
per
400
Ele
ctro
ns
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 14) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Single Crystal CVD Diamond
HV and Pumping Characteristics
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500
Co
llect
ion
Dis
tan
ce (
mm
)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
071415b OSU HV Curve
Time (min)1 10 10
210
3
Co
llect
ion
Dis
tan
ce (
um
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
071415 Pump-up Curve (HV=500V)
• High quality scCVD diamond collects all the charge at E=0.2V/µ!
• High quality scCVD diamond does not pump!
But...
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 15) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Single Crystal CVD Diamond
But for Other Diamonds
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500
Co
llect
ion
Dis
tan
ce (
mm
)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
CD134 OSU HV Curve
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500
Co
llect
ion
Dis
tan
ce (
mm
)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
CD135 OSU HV Curve
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Co
llect
ion
Dis
tan
ce (
mm
)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
CD136 OSU HV Curve
HV (Volts)0 100 200 300 400 500
Co
llect
ion
Dis
tan
ce (
mm
)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
CD137 OSU HV Curve
Not that easy to make!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 16) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Single Crystal CVD Diamond
Largest scCVD Diamond:
• Began with 4mm × 4mm• Today 7mm × 7mm• Well on our way to 8mm × 8mm sizes!
Impurities, Defects and Dislocations: Photo-Luminescence Measurements
Left Image: High purity, no nitrogen, no dislocations.Middle Image: Contains nitrogen - NV centre, 575 nm PL.Right Image: Contains dislocations, broad band blue PL.
May be able to unravel the compexity of the CVD process!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 17) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Single Crystal CVD Diamond
Charge Collection Properties: Transient Current Measurements (TCT)
• Measure charge carrier properties separately for electron and holes• Use α-source (Am241) to inject charge
- penetration ≈ 14 µm (thickness of diamonds ≈ 470 µm)
- use positive and negative applied voltage
• Amplify ionization current
Extracted parameters: Transit time, velocity, lifetime, space charge, pulse shape, charge.
Preliminary Results: saturated velocity ve = 96 km/s, vh = 141 km/slifetimes ≈ 34 ns >> transit time (charge trapping not the issue)
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 18) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Applications
CVD Diamond Used or Planned for Use in Several Fields
• High Energy Physics
• Heavy Ion Beam Diagnostics
• Sychrotron Radiation Monitoring
• Neutron and α Detection
Applications Discussed Here
• Pixel DetectorsATLAS, CMS
• Beam MonitoringBaBar
Belle
ATLAS
CMS
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 19) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Pixel Detectors
ATLAS FE/I Pixels (Al)
• Atlas pixel pitch 50µm × 400µm• Over Metalisation: Al• Lead-tin solder bumping at IZM in Berlin
CMS Pixels (Ti-W)
• CMS pixel pitch 125µm × 125µm• Metalization: Ti/W• Indium bumping at UC Davis
→ Bump bonding yield ≈ 100 % for both ATLAS and CMS devices
New radiation hard chips produced this year.
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 20) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Pixel Detectors
Results from an ATLAS pixel detector
1 Chip Assembly
2x8 Chip Assembly (Module)
1 Chip IV Curve
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 21) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Pixel Detectors
Results from an ATLAS pixel detector
1 Chip Source Test (Am241) 1 Chip Source Test (Cd109)
Americium 241 deposits ≈ 4600eCadmium 109 deposits ≈ 1600e
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 22) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Pixel Detectors
Results from an ATLAS pixel detector
1 Chip Beam Test (x-Resolution)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2
Resy/mm
1 Chip Beam Test (y-Resolution)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4
Resy/mm
Pitch is 50µm × 400µmSpatial Resolution ≈ pitch/
√12
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 23) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Pixel Detectors
Results from a CMS pixel detector
Efficiency Resolution
• Results with 200µm collection distance diamondEfficiency ∼ 94%Spatial resolution ∼ 31µm for 125µm pitch
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 24) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Diamond Pixel Detectors
Results from a CMS pixel detector
Efficiency vs Pixel
• Inefficient pixels due to bump bonding and/or electronics - shown in pulser tests
• Excellent correlation between beam telescope and pixel tracker data!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 25) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring - New Application - BaBar, Belle, ATLAS, CMS
Motivation:
→ Radiation monitoring crucial for Si operation/abort system of BaBar, Belle, LHC
→ Abort beams on large current spikes
→ Measure calibrated daily and integrated dose
Style:
• DC current or Slow Readout• Requires low leakage current• Requires small erratic dark currents• Allows simple measuring scheme
• Examples: BaBar, Belle, CMS
• Single Particle Counting• Requires fast readout (GHz range)• Requires low noise• Allows timing correlations
• Example: ATLAS
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 26) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
The BaBar/Belle Diamond Radiation Monitor Prototypes:
• Package must be small to fit in allocated space• Package must be robust
Schematic View
Diamond
Au Contact
In SolderHV Insulation
Ground BraidKapton Insulation
Copper Shield
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 27) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring - BaBar
The BaBar/Belle Diamond Radiation Monitor Prototypes:
→ BaBar/Belle presently use silicon PIN diodes, leakage current increases 2nA/krad
→ After 100fb−1 signal≈10nA, noise≈ 1-2µA
→ Large effort to keep working, BaBar PIN diodes will not last past 2005
Photo of BaBar Prototype Devices Photo of Installed BaBar Device
BaBar device inside the silicon vertex detector.
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 28) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring - Belle
The BaBar/Belle Diamond Radiation Monitor Prototypes:
Photo of Belle Prototype Device Photo of Installed Belle Device
Belle device just outside the silicon vertex detector.
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 29) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
Results on Calibration in BaBar:
• In BaBar during injection relative to silicon diodes: 5.9mrad/nC (Feb)• In BaBar during injection relative to silicon diodes: 5.8mrad/nC (Apr)• Correlation coefficient unchanged over several months
Diamond Current/nA0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Dio
de
Rat
e/m
Rad
/s
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0.2552 ±p0 = -4.897
0.01263 ±p1 = 5.916
February
BE:MID rate vs BE diamond current 0.2552 ±p0 = -4.897
0.01263 ±p1 = 5.916
Diamond Current/nA0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Dio
de
Rat
e/m
Rad
/s0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0.2533 ±p0 = -7.085
0.01236 ±p1 = 5.801
April
BE:MID rate vs BE diamond current 0.2533 ±p0 = -7.085
0.01236 ±p1 = 5.801
Calibration repeatable over many months
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 30) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
Data Taking in BaBar:
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 225000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
20000 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500
BE diamond current
BE:MID diode signal current (Sig 11)
LER current
Time/seconds
Dia
mon
d/D
iode
cur
rent
/nA
Time/secondsH
ER
cur
rent
/mA
Fast Abort Soft Abort
System operating for 18 months in BaBar and works well!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 31) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
Leakage Current in BaBar
• Diamonds have received 250kRad 60Co plus 750kRad while installed
• No observed change in leakage current (<0.1nA) or fluctuations (30pA)• Data directly from BaBar SVTRAD system• Electronic noise (≈ 0.5nA) substracted off
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
20 40 60 80 100 120 140February 5, No Beams Time (s)
Cur
rent
(nA
)
April 17, No Beams Time (s)
Cur
rent
(nA
)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 32) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
Discovery of Erratic Dark Currents
It is observed the diamond current increases as the magnetic field goes off.
This happens every time the field goes off in BaBar
The Eratic Dark Currents have been reproduced in the laboratory!
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 33) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
Discovery of Erratic Dark Currents
Eratic Dark Currents go away every time the magnetic field is turned on!
Origin is still a mystery
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 34) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
Very Fast Time Scale (ns) in BaBar
• Use a fast amplifier to look at PIN-diode and diamond signals• Trigger on the PIN-diode signal• Look at fast spikes: red = diamond, black = PIN-diode
Diamond is fast enough (< 20 ns) → now used in BaBar abort systemInstallation of full diamond system possible in summer 2005
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 35) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
The CMS Diamond Radiation Monitor Program:
• Diamond activity has begun!
• Test beam emulating beam accident - unsynchronised beam abort - 1012 protons lostin 260 ns in CMS
• Worst case 100x unsynchronised beam abort over several turns - protection requiresearly detection
• Possible location in the CMS detector:
Monitors
Simulation of a Beam Accident in CMS
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 36) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Radiation Monitoring
The ATLAS Diamond Radiation Monitor Program:
• Diamond activity has begun!
• Time of flight measurement to distinguish collisions from background
• Located behind pixel detector forward disks in pixel support tube
• Possible ATLAS scenario:
Beam Condition Monitor in ATLAS
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 37) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Summary
CVD Diamond as Radiation Tolerant Detectors
• High Quality pCVD diamond (ccd up to 275 µm) are readily available in large sizes
MP signal ≈ 8000 e
99% of charge distribution above 3000 e
Attained S/N=60/1 with 2µs shaping time; 8/1 at 25ns
• Radiation Tests show tolerance up to 2× 1015/cm2
Using trackers allows a correlation between S/N and Resolution
Dark current decreases with fluence Some loss of S/N with fluence Resolution improves with fluence
• Present pCVD diamonds should surpass performance of silicon at around 1015p/cm2
scCVD Diamonds May Overcome the Limitation of pCVD Material
• Full signal collection at E<<1V/µm
• Long charge lifetime• Very little trapping- uniform detector
Many Applications Benefit from use of Diamond
• Beam Monitoring Now - BaBar, Belle• Strip or Pixel detectors for the future
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 38) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University
Future Plans for RD42
• Charge Collection
Continue research program to improve pCVD material:
collection distance → 300µm (Q = 10, 800e)
→ improved uniformity
→ identification of trapping centers
Begin research program on scCVD diamond
• Radiation Hardness of Diamond Trackers and Pixel Detectors
Continue tracker irradiations this year, add pixel irradiations
With Protons:
→ 5× 1015/cm2 → Now
With Pions:
→ 5× 1015/cm2
• Beam Tests with Diamond Trackers and Pixel Detectors
→ trackers with intermediate strips, SCTA128 electronics
→ pixel detectors with ATLAS and CMS radhard electronics now available!
→ construct the first full ATLAS diamond pixel module
• Material Research
→ Florence, OSU, Paris, Rome
IWORID 2004
July 26-29, 2004 - Glasgow, UK
Diamond (Radiation) Detectors Are Forever! (page 39) Harris Kagan
Ohio State University