Development Team Review Comments · 7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 8011...
Transcript of Development Team Review Comments · 7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 8011...
Development Team Review Comments The following comments have been provided by reviewers of your land use application. At this
time, a resubmittal of your application is required before this case is ready to be scheduled for
public hearing.
To prepare your resubmittal, you will be expected to provide:
• A response to each comment with a description of the revisions and the page of the
response on the site plan;
• Any revised plans or renderings; and
• A list identifying any additional changes made to the original submission other than those
required by staff.
Resubmittal documents must be provided in person to the One-Stop Customer Service Center of
the Community and Economic Development Department. The following items will be expected
by our One-Stop Customer Service Center:
• One paper copy of all new materials
o Paper copies shall not excced 11”x17” (exception shall be made only for
construction drawings or engineering plan review)
o All paper copies shall be accompanied by the attached Resubmittal Form
• One digital copy of all new materials
o All digital materials shall be in a single PDF document
o The single PDF document shall be bookmarked
o If a Subdivision Improvements Agreement, Legal Description, or Development
Agreement is required, then an additional Microsoft Word version of these
documents shall also be provided
Re-submittal Form
Case Name/ Number: _______________________________________
Case Manager: _______________________________________
Re-submitted Items:
Development Plan/ Site Plan
Plat
Parking/ Landscape Plan
Engineering Documents
Subdivision Improvements Agreement
Other: ___________________________
* All re-submittals must have this cover sheet and a cover letter addressing review comments.
Please note the re-submittal review period is 21 days.
The cover letter must include the following information: Restate each comment that requires a response Provide a response below the comment with a description of the revisions Identify any additional changes made to the original document
For County Use Only:
Date Accepted:
Staff (accepting intake):
Resubmittal Active: Addressing, Building Safety, Neighborhood Services,
Engineering, Environmental, Parks, Planner, ROW, SIA - Finance, SIA - Attorney
Country Club Ranchettes Final PlatProject Name:
PLT2019-00005Project Number:
Date: 10/15/2019
Development Review Team Comments
10/15/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Greg Barnes
Date:
Email: [email protected]
Plan Coordination 3rd Review
Resubmittal Required
10/15/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Matthew Emmens
Date:
Email: [email protected]
Development Engineering Review 3rd Review
Review complete with comments. Comments too large for workflow. See doc #5995082. Applicant must respond, in writing, to all comments, include those from the 1st review.
Resubmittal Required
10/15/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Greg Barnes
Date:
Email: [email protected]
Tri-County Review 3rd Review
See attached letter from TCHD.
Resubmittal Required
10/15/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Christine Fitch
Date:
Email:
SIA Review 2 - Attorney
Please see redlines. I believe that the collateral amount might be calculated incorrectly.
Resubmittal Required
10/15/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Laura Garcia
Date:
Email:
SIA Review 2 - Finance
Attached is my calculation for the collateral. It does not match the amount that they have on the SIA or on the exhibit. Which by the way are both different. The amount in the SIA and exhibit should be the same.
Resubmittal Required
10/15/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Greg Barnes
Date:
Email: [email protected]
Planner Review 3rd Review
No further planning/zoning comments
Complete
10/07/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Marissa Hillje
Date:
Email: [email protected]
ROW Review 3rd Review
ROW1. The right of way granted to Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company Book 2665/ Page 812 shall be shown on the plat. TCHD has several concerns regarding this pipelineA note shall be added on the plat (see comments from TCHD):“The areas indicated on Lots 12, 14, 15 and 45 for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems are to remain free of any improvements, e.g. irrigated landscaping, paving, horse corals, outbuildings etc. “ROW2. The 30ft waterline easements must be recorded and reception # labeled if it is shown on this plat. If it is not recorded before final plat approval then remove them altogether from the plat. ROW3. Submit an updated title commitment which should be used to depict the applicable recordings on the plat. Send Adams County a copy of the title commitment with your application dated no later than 30 days to review in order to ensure that any other party's interests are not encroached upon.ROW4. Edit the outlot/tract table- see redlinesROW5. See redlines on plat attached.
Resubmittal Required
10/04/2019
Commenting Division:
Name of Reviewer: Marissa Hillje
Date:
Email: [email protected]
Addressing Review 3rd Review
The addresses have been added to the plat
Complete
PLT2019-00005 Country Club Ranchettes
Engineering Review Comments (final plat) First Submittal Comments: ENG1: Flood Insurance Rate Map – FIRM Panel # (08001C0360H), Federal Emergency Management Agency, March 5, 2007. According to the above reference, the project site is NOT located within a delineated 100-year flood hazard zone; A floodplain use permit will not be required. ENG2: The applicant shall be responsible to ensure compliance with all Federal, State, and Local water quality construction requirements. The project site is not within the County's MS4 Stormwater Permit area; an Adams County Stormwater Quality Permit (SWQ) is NOT required. The installation of erosion and sediment control BMPs are expected. ENG3: LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Section 9-01-03-14: All construction projects shall reduce drainage impacts to the maximum extent practicable, and implement practices such as: 1. On-site structural and non-structural BMPs to promote infiltration, evapo-transpiration or use of stormwater, 2. Minimization of Directly Connected Impervious Area (MDCIA), 3. Green Infrastructure (GI), 4. Preservation of natural drainage systems that result in the infiltration, evapo-transpiration or use of stormwater in order to protect water quality and aquatic habitat. 5. Use of vegetation, soils, and roots to slow and filter stormwater runoff. 6. Management of stormwater as a resource rather than a waste product by creating functional, attractive, and environmentally friendly developments. 7. Treatment of stormwater flows as close to the impervious area as possible. LID shall be designed and maintained to meet the standards of these Regulations and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 3. ENG4: Sustainable Development Practices Section 3-27-06-05-07-08: To the maximum extent practicable, new buildings are encouraged to incorporate one or more of the following features: 1. Opportunities for the integration of renewable energy features in the design of buildings or sites, such as: solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, or low-impact hydro sources; 2. Energy-efficient materials, including recycled materials that meet the requirements of these regulations; 3. Materials that are produced from renewable resources; 4. Low-Impact Development (LID) stormwater management features; 5. A green roof, such as a vegetated roof, or a cool roof;
6. Materials and design meeting the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED-NC certification requirements; 7. A greywater recycling system. ENG5: Prior to scheduling the final plat/FDP BOCC hearing, the developer is required to submit for review and receive approval of all construction documents (construction plans and reports). Construction documents shall include, at a minimum, onsite and public improvements construction plans, drainage report, traffic impact study. All construction documents must meet the requirements of the Adams County Development Standards and Regulations. The developer shall submit to the Adams County Development Review Engineering division the following: Engineering Review Application, Engineering Review Fee, two (2) copies of all construction documents. The development review fee for an Engineering Review is dependent on the type of project and/or the size of the project. The Development Review fee can be found in the Development Services Fee Schedule, located on the following web page: http://www.adcogov.org/one-stop-customer-center. The applicant has submitted construction documents for review. The construction documents are not yet approved for construction. ENG6: The developer is required to construct roadway improvements adjacent to the proposed site. Roadway improvements will consist of curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the site and, any roadway improvements as required by the approved traffic impact study. ENG7: Prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits, the developer shall enter into a Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA) with the County and provide a security bond for all public improvements. ENG8: No building permits will be issued until all public improvements have been constructed, inspected and preliminarily accepted by the County's Transportation Dept. ENG9: The developer is responsible for the repair or replacement of any broken or damaged County infrastructure. Second Submittal Comments: ENG10: Applicant did not respond to any of the Engineering Review comments submitted for the Final Plat case. Applicant must respond to and resolve all of the Final Plat comments to receive Engineering Review approval. See doc #5930181. Applicant Response: Comment responses were included with the previous submittal. This comment was resolved with Matt Emmons on 07/25/19.
Third Submittal Comments: ENG11: Although, all of the comments from the 1st submittal have been addressed in the Plat and construction documents, the applicant still needs to respond, in writing, to all of the comments, including those from the first submittal. See above. SIA Review: ENG12: Any revisions to the construction plans may affect construction costs. The Exhibit B cost estimate, included with the SIA, cannot be approved by Engineering until the construction plans are preliminarily approved. ENG13: Section 8.B, include the names of the street that the ROW is being dedicated for.
QTY COST TOTAL
1.00 3,200.00 3,200.00
230.00 45.00 10,350.00
4.00 2,125.00 8,500.00
390.00 65.00 25,350.00
11.00 3,645.00 40,095.00
390.00 105.00 40,950.00
1.00 2,645.00 2,645.00
1.00 5,685.00 5,685.00
60.00 405.00 24,300.00
133.00 685.00 91,105.00
133.00 605.00 80,465.00
1.00 83,500.00 83,500.00
272.00 525.00 142,800.00
1.00 49,500.00 49,500.00
2.00 18,900.00 37,800.00
950.00 49.00 46,550.00
50.00 81.00 4,050.00
497.00 49.00 24,353.00
245.00 49.00 12,005.00
67.00 145.00 9,715.00 CALCULATION SIA DIFERENCE
124.00 144.00 17,856.00 760,774.00 (1,038,744.00) 277,970.00
9,860.00 7.32 72,175.20
1.00 4,500.00 4,500.00
4,190.00 23.00 96,370.00
31,014.00 6.60 204,692.40
23,110.00 19.50 450,645.00
1.00 1,500.00 1,500.00
1,026.00 10.50 10,773.00
593.00 10.50 6,226.50
946.00 10.50 9,933.00
1.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
34,649.00 0.96 33,263.04
1.00 1,750.00 1,750.00 901,828.14
Cost Estimate from Exhibit “B” 1,662,602.14
Additional 20% for Administration 332,520.43
Total Cost with 20% Admin 1,995,122.57
Additional 5% per year of Total Cost with 20% Admin 99,756.13
Total 2,094,878.70
’”
TM
7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ph:303.708.0500 manhard.comCivil Engineering Surveying & Geospatial Services GISWater Resource Management Construction Management
TM
7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ph:303.708.0500 manhard.comCivil Engineering Surveying & Geospatial Services GISWater Resource Management Construction Management
TM
7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ph:303.708.0500 manhard.comCivil Engineering Surveying & Geospatial Services GISWater Resource Management Construction Management
TM
7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ph:303.708.0500 manhard.comCivil Engineering Surveying & Geospatial Services GISWater Resource Management Construction Management
TM
7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ph:303.708.0500 manhard.comCivil Engineering Surveying & Geospatial Services GISWater Resource Management Construction Management
TM
7600 East Orchard Road, Suite 150-N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ph:303.708.0500 manhard.comCivil Engineering Surveying & Geospatial Services GISWater Resource Management Construction Management
Adams County Public Land Dedication Worksheet
Urban School District
Date Computed= 10/15/2019
Case Name: Country Club Ranchettes, Filing No. 1
Case Number: PLT2019-00005
Case Manager: Greg Barnes
Rural Residential (A-1, RE)Number of Units= 56
Population generated= 184
Student population generated= 43.4
School Acreage Needed= 1.1284
Regional Park Acreage Needed= 0.728
Total Acres of PLD Needed= 1.8564
Land Value per acre= $13,662.00
PLD Fee in lieu= $40,663.58
Deposits:
School District { } Account= $15,416.20
Neighborhood Parks $15,301.44
Regional Parks Account= $9,945.94
Serving Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties www.tchd.org
6162 S. Willow Dr., Suite 100 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303-220-9200
October 4, 2019 Greg Barnes Adams County Community and Economic Development 4430 South Adams County Parkway, Suite W2000A Brighton, CO 80601 RE: Country Club Ranchettes Final Plat, PLT2019-00005 TCHD Case No. 5869 Dear Mr. Barnes, Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the resubmittal of the Major Subdivision Final Plat to create 56 single-family lots located at the intersection of 162nd Avenue and Hayesmount Road. Tri-County Health Department (TCHD) staff previously reviewed the application for the first and second submittal of the Major Subdivision Final Plat and in letters dated April 11 and June 19, 2019 responded with comments. After reviewing the resubmittal materials, TCHD has the following comments. Pipeline Easement The plat no longer indicates a 50’ easement for a pipeline. If the pipeline easement remains, TCHD is concerned about the safety hazard posed by the gas line, in the event a contractor or property owner damages the line during construction. In addition, the pipeline easement limits the area available for construction of on-site wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) on some of the lots. The lots on which the pipeline presents a safety hazard include: lots 12-16, 39-45, and 49-56. To address this concern, we recommend signs and advisory notices to the affected property owner. On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems The pipeline limits available area for OWTS on several lots including: 12, 14, 15 and 45. In order to ensure that these four lots can accommodate an OWTS, TCHD investigated the soil types in the area. Upon review, TCHD has determined 3,000 ft2 is an appropriate size for an OWTS envelope (primary and replacement OWTS) on each lot. The applicant shall submit plans with envelopes for both the residence and OWTS on each of these lots to ensure they can properly be served. In addition, TCHD recommends a plat note be included to inform prospective purchasers of the four lots about the pipeline easement and its impact on OWTS. An example plat note would read:
Country Club Ranchettes Resubmittal October 4, 2019 Page 2 of 3
The areas indicated on Lots 12, 14, 15 and 45 for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) are to remain free of any improvements, e.g. irrigated landscaping, paving, horse corals, out-buildings, etc.
Until TCHD receives a site plan with envelops for lots 12, 14, 15, and 45, TCHD cannot provide a favorable recommendation for service of lots 12, 14, 15, and 45 by OWTS. TCHD is available to meet with the applicant to discuss our recommendations. For the remaining lots, TCHD has no objection to the proposed subdivision being served by OWTS provided that they are properly permitted, installed, and operated in compliance with our current OWTS regulation.
Water Service TCHD does not have record of a “will-serve letter”. To ensure the subdivision can be served, TCHD requests to see a “will-serve” letter from the Great Rock North Water and Sanitation District. Drainage Easement A drainage easement is shown on Lots 13, 20, and 47-56. Plat note 7 addresses drainage easements and prohibits construction of improvements within those easements. Since the easements comprise a significant portion of those lots, and OWTS appear to be prohibited in those areas, we recommend that the applicant clarify whether OWTS are prohibited in the drainage areas. If OWTS are prohibited in drainage areas, we recommend the plat note specifically mention that OWTS are prohibited. If OWTS are allowed in drainage areas, we recommend the plat note state that OWTS are allowed, or allowed with conditions. On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) – Responsible Management Entity Proper wastewater management promotes effective and responsible water use, protects potable water from contaminants, and provides appropriate collection, treatment, and disposal of waste, which protects public health and the environment. Maintenance of OWTS is often ignored or neglected. Many owners of properties served by OWTS are not even aware that they have an OWTS, let alone have any knowledge about how the system operates. Proper maintenance and education can prevent premature failure of OWTS, and routine inspections can identify problems prior to complete failure. If problems are detected early, they may be corrected less expensively (than replacement of an absorption area) and also prevent nuisance conditions and disease transmission. Consequently, we recommend that a Responsible Management Entity (RME) i.e. district or homeowner's association provide for inspections, monitoring, and maintenance of OWTS.
Country Club Ranchettes Resubmittal October 4, 2019 Page 3 of 3
Abandoned Oil and Gas Facilities Inadvertent spills at oil and gas operation sites are possible, resulting in soil and groundwater contamination. Additionally, abandoned oil and gas wells and flowlines have the potential to leak oil and gas, contaminate soils and groundwater, and can pose an explosion risk. An abandoned oil and gas well is noted on the subject property. To help ensure residents are not exposed to harmful contaminants, TCHD recommends the applicant conduct an Environmental Site Assessment to better determine the environmental condition of the property. Moreover, the applicant should identify the location of flowlines and ensure they have been properly abandoned. Please feel free to contact me at 720-200-1585 or [email protected] if you have any questions. Sincerely,
Annemarie Heinrich, MPH/MURP Land Use and Built Environment Specialist cc: Sheila Lynch, Monte Deatrich, Michael Weakley, Warren Brown, TCHD