Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

16
Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS Regina Kwee CERN / Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Gentner Day 18.November 2009, CERN

description

Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS. Regina Kwee CERN / Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Gentner Day 18.November 2009, CERN. Outline. Motivation Introduction to Minimum Bias Events Designing an Interaction Trigger Trigger Performance Studies Summary and Outlook. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Page 1: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Development of an Interaction Trigger in

ATLASRegina Kwee

CERN / Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Gentner Day18.November 2009, CERN

Page 2: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Outline

• Motivation • Introduction to Minimum Bias Events• Designing an Interaction Trigger• Trigger Performance Studies• Summary and Outlook

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 2

Page 3: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Motivation

• Operation of LHC with pp-collisions at (nominal) √s = 14 TeV L ≈ 1034 cm-2 s-1

bunch-crossing rate of 25 ns

→ high event rate r = L x σ ≈ 109 inel. pp-collisions/s

R.Kwee 3

• Pile-up expect per bunch-crossing

around 20 piled-up collisions

→ one of the biggest challenges at LHC: understanding QCD-background as basis for each physics analysis

Strategy at ATLAS

• study inelastic interactions at low luminosities L ≈ 1031 cm-2 s-1

larger bunch pitch of 75 ns

→ single pp-collisions

• pp-interaction rate is <<110 % of the bunch-crossings contain a pp-interaction

→ Minimum-Bias Trigger• selects any pp-

interaction• for pp-interaction rate

≈1→ pure random trigger

Gentner Day at CERN

Page 4: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Minimum Bias Measurments

• Physics processes are soft interactions: have low Q2

(small momentum transfer)• perturbative QCD is not

applicable for small Q2 :differential cross-section diverges for pT → 0

→ employ phenomenological models to describe soft QCD

→ Monte-Carlo predictions at LHC energies are highly uncertain!

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 4

pse

ud

ora

pid

ity η

= -

ln(t

an

(θ/2

))

dNch/dη at η = 0

first measurements in ATLAS:

kinematic spectra of charged

particles dNch/dpT and dNch/dη

900 GeV900 GeV 7 TeV7 TeV 14 TeV14 TeV

CERN-OPEN-2008-020

Page 5: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Minimum Bias Events• inelastic cross-section can be sub-divided into its single contributions • prediction strongly depend on the theoretical model, here shown for

pythia 6.214 (phojet 1.12) at 14 TeV:

• dominant: non-diffractive events• precise definition of minimum bias events:given by the trigger system!

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 5

Page 6: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Event TopologiesPythia Generator Level at 14 TeV

R.Kwee 6

pseudorapidity

track multiplicity

Gentner Day at CERN

transverse momentum

ndiffsdiffddiff

ndiffsdiffddiff

ndiffsdiffddiff

lower multiplicity in diffractive events (more

forward)

mostly low-pt tracks from all inelastic processes

diffractive events are more

forward directed

charged stable primary

particles

ATLAS – work in progress

ATLAS – work in progress

ATLAS – work in progress

Page 7: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Minimum Bias TriggerATLAS has 2 independent minimum bias triggers:

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 7

Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillators (MBTS) relative simple detector

system: 16 scintillator counters per side between Inner Detector (tracking system) and LAr-calorimeter

cover 2.1< |η| < 3.8 will be used for

commissioning sub-detector systems

has a short lifetime due to radiation damages: 3-4 months at a luminosity of 5*1032 cm-2s-1

Page 8: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Minimum Bias TriggerATLAS has 2 independent minimum bias triggers:

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 8

Inner Detector based Minimum Bias Trigger provide a complementary

approach cover central detector

region |η| < 2.5 trigger requirements:

• introduce as little bias as possible

• suppress efficiently empty bunch-crossing and beam-background events

→ my work!

Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillators (MBTS) relative simple detector

system: 16 scintillator counters per side between Inner Detector (tracking system) and LAr-calorimeter

cover 2.1< |η| < 3.8 will be used for

commissioning sub-detector systems

has a short lifetime due to radiation damages: 3-4 months at a luminosity of 5*1032 cm-2s-1

Page 9: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Minimum Bias TriggerATLAS has 2 independent minimum bias triggers:

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 9

Inner Detector based Minimum Bias Trigger provide a complementary

approach cover central detector

region |η| < 2.5 trigger requirements:

• introduce as little bias as possible

• suppress efficiently empty bunch-crossing and beam-background events

→ my work!

pixel detector

silicon strip detector (SCT)

transition radiation tracker (TRT)

Page 10: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

The ATLAS Trigger System

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 10

• The system has been designed to cope with ~ 1.5 PB data per second

• It follows the concept of an „early rejection“ → 3 trigger levels L1: hardware + internal trigger

L1 latency 2.5 μs L2: software trigger

reconstructs physics objectsfound by L1, tracks.

L2 latency 10 ms EF: software trigger

uses more detailed calibrations constants as L2, else same as L2

EF latency ~ 1 second

Generally „region-of-interests“,

RoI‘s, are processed –unlike in

minimum bias triggers!

Page 11: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

ID based Minimum Bias Trigger

• L1: random trigger on filled bunches → avoids bias

• L2: SpacePointCounter forms 3d-detector hits in whole

pixel and SCT (spacepoints) detector

operate just above noise level → suppress empty bunch-crossing events

needs to be robust against HV trips → dynamic masking of noisy modules

• EF: TrackCounter reconstruct silicon low-pt-tracks require one track close to the IP →

suppress beam-gas/-halo events

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 11

Features/Status algorithms are highly

configurable → provides flexibility to react on different beam background conditions

a back-up trigger using only TRT hits at L2 has been developed (TRT proved to be very stable during first beam operations)

all minbias triggers have already taken and still take (cosmic) data!

Page 12: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Performance Studies

• trigger efficiency at L2

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 12

ndiffsdiffddiff

empty

cut at 3 SCT spacepoints at L2

suppresses all empty events

cut at 3 SCT spacepoints at L2

suppresses all empty events

SCT spacepoints

An SCT spacepoints is formed by a coincidence of 2 strips → intrinsic noise suppression

An SCT spacepoints is formed by a coincidence of 2 strips → intrinsic noise suppression

ATLAS – work in progress

ATLAS – work in progress

Page 13: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Performance Studies

• trigger efficiency at L2

Gentner Day at CERN 13

cut at 3 SCT spacepoints at L2

suppresses all empty events

cut at 3 SCT spacepoints at L2

suppresses all empty events

cut at 3 SCT spacepoints at L2 +

additional cut at 1 track with |z0| < 200 mm at EF

cut at 3 SCT spacepoints at L2 +

additional cut at 1 track with |z0| < 200 mm at EF

• trigger efficiency at EF

ATLAS – work in progress

ATLAS – work in progress

Page 14: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Performance Studies

• trigger bias→ change in distribution (e.g. η, pT, Nch) which is introduced by the trigger condition (here shown for 3 SCT spacepoints)

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 14

ndiffsdiffddiff

ndiffsdiffddiff

no bias expected in η (measure within ID range)

ID

more studies needed formultiplicity dependence

ATLAS – work in progress

ATLAS – work in progress

Page 15: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Summary and Outlook

• minimum bias studies are needed to understand properties of inelastic interactions → they form dominant QCD background in LHC enviroment

• minimum bias events will form pile-up at high luminosity runs→ study at low luminosities, designed an interaction trigger

• Thesis plan (adapted to new LHC schedule)→ prepare for detector and trigger commissioning with minimum bias triggers

• more performance studies ongoing → will determine the employment of (all) minbias triggers

• functionality provided, looking forward for collsions!

R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 15

Page 16: Development of an Interaction Trigger in ATLAS

Danksagung

Many thanks to my supervisorsNick Ellis (CERN) and Hermann Kolanoski (Humboldt-University)

and my former supervisorKlaus Mönig (DESY)

as well as to my ATLAS collegues and CMS friends

and the BMBF for creating the Wolfgang-Genter-Program!R.Kwee Gentner Day at CERN 16