Development indicators Gianni Vaggi and Clara Capelli University of Pavia November 2013 Inequality.

Development indicators

Gianni Vaggi and Clara CapelliUniversity of Pavia November 2013

Inequality

• Relative concept;

• Focus on distribution (wealth, income, opportunities, etc.);

• Unlike efficiency (see Pareto), there is no widespread consensus onthe definition of equity/distributive justice;

• Income distribution can be functional (i.e. wages, profits, rents) or personal.

Economia dello Sviluppo

The personal distribution of income depends on:

• Personal features and skills;

• Personal position wrt to an economy’s productive structure;

• Welfare schemes (the so-called "secondary personal distribution ofincome)


The Lorenz CurveThe Lorenz Curve

• Developed in 1905 by Max Lorenz;

• Relates the cumulative proportion of income to the cumulativeproportion of individuals;

• The x-axis records the cumulative proportion of individuals, rankedby income level (from the poorest to the richest);

• The y-axis records the income share for each proportion ofpopulation.


Measuring InequalityInequality Trends

How to Draw a Lorenz Curve

Calculate the proportion of income belonging to each individual;

Calculate which proportion of total population each individualrepresents;

Sort these individuals on the basis of the income they own;

Define the line of equidistributed income;

Plot the cumulative proportion of income against the cumulativeproportion of population.


The Gini CoefficientThe Gini Coefficient

How can we compare Lorenz Curves? An index allows for easiercomparisons.

• Introduced by Corrado Gini in 1912 (Variability and Mutability);

• Measures the inequality among values of a frequency distribution;

• Ranges from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (complete inequality);

• It is equal to the area between the equality line and the Lorenz Curve, divided by the area below the equality line;


Gini coefficients, 2008Gini coefficients, 2008

Afghanistan 27.8Argentina 46.3Brazil 55.1Colombia 57.2China (2005) 42.5Ghana (2006) 42.8Egypt 30.8India 33.4Nigeria 44.8Malaysia (2007) 46.2Mozambique 45.7Russia 42.3Thailandia 40.5Turkey 39.0Venezuela (2006) 44.8West Bank & Gaza (2007) 38.7

Source: WB DatabaseEconomia dello Sviluppo

Kuznets CurveKuznets Curve


Kuznets Curve/2Kuznets Curve/2

• Industrialization and rural-urban migration lead to a rise ininequality;

• After a certain level of income, democracy and welfare schemesallow for more equality;


Again on China & India, Brazil & VenezuelaAgain on China & India, Brazil & Venezuela


Kuznets Curve: CriticismsKuznets Curve: Criticisms

Fields (2001): other factors matter more than the stage ofdevelopment (history&geography, role of mining, access to land,etc.);

Stiglitz (1996): East Asian Miracles shows that Kuznets’ story doesnot hold;

Palma (2011): The real difference is made by what is appropriatedby the richest decile.


The Gini coefficient fell in 44 countries (out of 81 examined):

Source: WBI, 2012


Maddison, The World Economy. Historical Statistics (2003)

• World inequality falls between 1950 and 1960 (post-war catching upof Europe and Japan);

• It then rises strongly until 1980 (rapid growth of developedcountries);

• It then falls, mainly because of China.


Source: Maddison, 2003


Measuring InequalityInequality Trends

Bourguignon & Morrisson, Inequality Among World Citizens, 1820-1992 (2001):

• World inequality (global Gini) increased by 30 percent, hitting 0.6;

• This is mostly due to the "between" component;• A comparatively little difference was found between the world

distribution of the 1990s and in the 1950s;• Stabilizing effect of the "within" component.


Development indicators Gianni Vaggi and Clara Capelli University of Pavia November 2013 Inequality.

Documents

Transcript of Development indicators Gianni Vaggi and Clara Capelli University of Pavia November 2013 Inequality.