Development Assessment Unit · 2020. 3. 11. · DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015...
Transcript of Development Assessment Unit · 2020. 3. 11. · DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015...
Development Assessment
Unit
Tuesday, 26 May 2015
THE H
ILLS S
HIR
E C
OU
NC
IL
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
ITEM SUBJECT PAGE
ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 3
ITEM-2 DA NO. 1295/2015/HA - TWO STOREY
DWELLING AND A DETACHED SECONDARY
DWELLING - LOT 24 DP 25334, NO. 15 ST
AIDANS AVENUE, OATLANDS
5
ITEM-3 DA NO. 1128/2015/HA - WHOLESALE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS (TRIFORCE SPORTS) - LOT 14 SP
77109 - 41/24-32 LEXINGTON DRIVE, BELLA
VISTA
23
ITEM-4 DA NO. 907/2015/HA - CONSTRUCTION OF A
PART TWO, PART THREE STOREY DWELLING
WITH ATTACHED SECONDARY DWELLING AND
IN-GROUND SWIMMING POOL - LOT 1 DP
600391, NO. 418 OLD NORTHERN ROAD,
GLENHAVEN
35
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 3
MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING HELD AT THE
HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, 19 MAY 2015
PRESENT
Cameron McKenzie Group Manager – Environment & Planning
James McBride Development Assessment Co-ordinator
Andrew Brooks Manager – Subdivision & Development Certification
Mark Colburt Manager – Environment & Health
Craig Woods Manager – Regulatory Services
Tim Davies Principal Forward Planner
Kristine McKenzie Principal Executive Planner
APOLOGIES
Paul Osborne Manager – Development Assessment
Stewart Seale Manager – Forward Planning
TIME OF COMMENCEMENT
8:30am
TIME OF COMPLETION
8:38am
ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
RESOLUTION
The Minutes of the Development Assessment Unit Meeting of Council held on 12 May
2015 be confirmed.
ITEM-2 DA 522/2015/HA - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING
POOL AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED
SECONDARY DWELLING UNDER SEPP
(AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING 2009) LOT 104
DP 232375, NO. 16 TALISMAN AVENUE, CASTLE
HILL
RESOLUTION
The application be approved subject to conditions as set out in the report.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 4
ITEM-3 DA 763/2015/ZD - SUBDIVISION CREATING SIX
COMMUNITY TITLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND
ONE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION LOT (RURAL
CLUSTER) - LOT 10 DP 871096, NO. 76 HALCROWS
ROAD, GLENORIE
RESOLUTION
The application be approved subject to conditions as set out in the report.
END MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 5
ITEM-2 DA NO. 1295/2015/HA - TWO STOREY DWELLING
AND A DETACHED SECONDARY DWELLING - LOT 24
DP 25334, NO. 15 ST AIDANS AVENUE, OATLANDS
THEME: Balanced Urban Growth
OUTCOME: 7 Responsible planning facilitates a desirable living
environment and meets growth targets.
STRATEGY:
7.2 Manage new and existing development with a robust
framework of policies, plans and processes that is in
accordance with community needs and expectations.
MEETING DATE: 26 MAY 2015
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT
AUTHOR: SENIOR TOWN PLANNER
SHANNON BUTLER
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE PLANNER
KRISTINE MCKENZIE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Development Application is for the construction of a two storey dwelling and
detached secondary dwelling under the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy
(Affordable Rental Housing) 2009. It is proposed to retain the existing in-ground
swimming pool and associated pool fencing. The two storey dwelling is proposed to
contain four bedrooms and a double garage. It is proposed to be constructed of face
bricks with metal deck roofing. The secondary dwelling is proposed to contain two
bedrooms and will have colours and finishes consistent with the primary dwelling.
The application has been assessed against the provisions of SEPP (Affordable Rental
Housing) 2009 and is considered satisfactory. The application seeks variations to
Development Control Plan 2012 Part B Section 2- Residential relating to corner lot and
garage setbacks. The setbacks are considered satisfactory given the existing and
proposed landscaping, proposed fencing and the ability to park a vehicle forward of the
garage.
The application was notified in accordance with Council’s policy and one submission was
received. The issue raised in the submission relates to increased traffic as a result of the
proposed secondary dwelling. The increase in traffic from the secondary dwelling is
negligible and will not adversely impact on the traffic environment.
Accordingly, the proposal is recommended for approval subject to conditions.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 6
BACKGROUND MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
Applicant: Mr S & Mrs N
Krishnaswamy
1. SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing)
2009 – Complies.
Owner: Mr S & Mrs N
Krishnaswamy
2. LEP 2012 – Satisfactory.
Zoning: R2 Low Density
Residential
3. DCP Part B Section 2- Residential –
Variations proposed, see report.
Area: 1043m² 4. Section 79C (EP&A Act) –
Satisfactory.
Existing Development: Single storey
dwelling and
swimming pool.
5. Section 94 Contribution – N/A
SUBMISSIONS REASONS FOR REFERRAL TO DAU
1. Exhibition: Not required. 1. Variations to DCP Part B Section 2-
Residential.
2. Notice Adj Owners: Yes, 14 days.
2. Submission received.
3. Number Advised: 10
4. Submissions
Received:
One POLITICAL DONATION – None disclosed.
HISTORY
21/04/2015 Subject Development Application lodged with Council.
28/04/2015 Letter sent to the applicant in relation to compliance with SEPP
(Affordable Rental Housing) 2009, compliance with Residential
DCP and swimming pool fencing.
06/05/2015 Amended plans submitted in response to Council’s letter.
PROPOSAL
The Development Application is for the construction of a two storey dwelling and
detached secondary dwelling under the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy
(Affordable Rental Housing) 2009. It is proposed to retain the existing in-ground
swimming pool and associated pool fencing.
The two storey dwelling is proposed to contain four bedrooms and a double garage. It is
proposed to be constructed of face bricks with metal deck roofing.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 7
The secondary dwelling is proposed to contain two bedrooms and will have colours and
finishes consistent with the primary dwelling.
The subject site is of an irregular shape with three sides and an area of 1043m². Two
sides of the site front St Aidans Avenue and the remaining side adjoins a residential
property to the south.
ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Compliance with SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009
State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 defines a
secondary dwelling as follows;
“development for the purposes of a secondary dwelling includes the following:
(a) the erection of, or alterations or additions to, a secondary dwelling,
(b) alterations or additions to a principal dwelling for the purposes of a
secondary dwelling.
The standard instrument defines secondary dwelling as follows:
secondary dwelling means a self-contained dwelling that:
(a) is established in conjunction with another dwelling (the principal dwelling),
and
(b) is on the same lot of land (not being an individual lot in a strata plan or
community title scheme) as the principal dwelling, and
(c) is located within, or is attached to, or is separate from, the principal
dwelling.”
The proposal complies with the above definition.
The following development standards apply to Development Applications that are not
classed as complying development:
SEPP Requirement Proposal Compliance
Floor area of secondary
dwelling must be no more
than 60m².
Proposed floor area is 60m². Yes
Site area must be over
450m².
Site area: 1043m². Yes
Additional parking does not
have to be provided.
No additional parking
provided.
N/A
Total floor area to be no
more than that permitted
under another EPI.
There is no FSR specified
under LEP 2012.
N/A
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 8
2. Compliance with DCP Part B Section 2- Residential
The application has been assessed against the requirements of Development Control
Plan (DCP) Part B Section 2- Residential and the following variations were identified:
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD
DCP
REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT
COMPLIANCE
Corner setbacks The minimum
required front
setback for a corner
lot is 6 metres for
the primary frontage
and 4 metres for the
secondary frontage.
The following front
(corner lot) setbacks
are proposed:
Primary Dwelling:
3.09m primary.
7.39m secondary.
Secondary
Dwelling:
3.98m primary.
2.05m secondary.
No, however, the
proposed
variations are
considered
satisfactory given
the existing
landscape
screening and
proposed fencing.
Garage setback All garages must be
set back in
accordance with the
setback described
above (corner
setback control), or
5.5 metres,
whichever is the
greater.
The garage is
proposed to be set
back 3.09 metres
from the primary
frontage.
No, however, the
proposed garage
setback is
considered
satisfactory as
there is
satisfactory space
to park a vehicle
to the front of the
garage and not
impede on the
road reservation.
i) Building Setbacks
DCP Part B Section 2- Residential contains the following requirements relating to building
setbacks for corner lots:
(e) Development on corner allotments, with no frontages to classified roads shall
have regard to the streetscape of both street frontages and may provide a
setback of not less than 6 metres for the primary frontage and 4 metres to a
secondary road frontage.
The primary dwelling is proposed to have a 3.09m primary frontage setback and 7.39m
secondary front setback. The secondary dwelling is proposed to have a 3.98m primary
frontage setback and a 2.05m secondary front setback.
The DCP contains the following objectives:
(i) To provide setbacks that complement the streetscape and protects the privacy
and sunlight to adjacent dwellings in accordance with ESD Objective 7.
(ii) To ensure that new development is sensitive to the landscape setting, site
constraints and established character of the street and locality.
(iii) To ensure that the appearance of new development is of a high visual quality and
enhances the streetscape.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 9
The applicant has provided the following justification for the proposed variation:
We would like to apply for a variation to the secondary setback and garage setback
requirements set out in Council’s DCP. Our proposal has been sited in such a way as to
maximise the use of private open space and to maintain the existing in-ground pool.
There is a non-compliance with the secondary setback and the rear setback of the
secondary dwelling, however we feel that this is only minor as it is only a corner portion
of the garage which is a non-habitable room and the secondary dwelling is limited in its
positioning due to the site constraints.
Due to the irregular shape of the property, we ask that Council recognise that some
concession to the DCP is necessary to promote and encourage new development and
appealing designs that adhere to the existing streetscape. The proposed positioning of
the dwelling and secondary dwelling has no adverse impact on the neighbouring homes
or the existing streetscape.
Comment:
The proposed setbacks are considered satisfactory for the following reasons:
There is existing established vegetation and suitable fencing proposed on both
frontages. The fencing is proposed to be one metre in height and comprises a
brick base and piers and timber in-fill panels. The site contains an existing 1.8m
high brick fence in the south western part of the site to screen the swimming pool
from view and act as part of the pool barrier. This brick fence is proposed to be
retained. The proposed structures will be well screened from view from St Aidans
Avenue.
The site is an irregular shape and is constrained by the applicant’s intention to
retain the existing swimming pool.
The proposal will not result in any significant impacts on the established
streetscape.
The encroachments are not for the full extent of the frontage of the lot.
Accordingly, the proposed setbacks are considered satisfactory.
ii) Garage Setback
DCP Part B Section 2- Residential contains the following requirement relating to garage
setbacks:
(f) All garages must be setback in accordance with the setbacks described above,
or 5.5 metres, whichever is the greater.
The garage setback is proposed to reduce to 3.09m from the primary frontage. It is
noted that the garage setback increases to 11m given the irregular shape of the lot.
The DCP contains the following objectives:
(i) To provide setbacks that complement the streetscape and protects the privacy
and sunlight to adjacent dwellings in accordance with ESD Objective 7.
(ii) To ensure that new development is sensitive to the landscape setting, site
constraints and established character of the street and locality.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 10
(iii) To ensure that the appearance of new development is of a high visual quality and
enhances the streetscape.
The applicant has provided the following justification for the proposed variation:
The garage setback allows for a vehicle to park within the front setback to the front of
the garage and not protrude onto the road reservation. Accepting our application as
proposed will result in an orderly and economic use of the land by accommodating an
attractive new dwelling appropriate for the residential zone in which it is located.
Comment:
The proposed garage setback is considered satisfactory for the following reasons:
There is a satisfactory area to the front of the garage to allow a vehicle to park
and be clear of the road reservation. The garage setback varies from 3.09 metres
to 11 metres given the irregular shape of the lot.
The site is an irregular shape and is constrained by the applicant’s intention to
retain the existing swimming pool.
The proposal will not result in any significant impacts on the established
streetscape.
The existing garage has a front setback reducing to 2.3 metres, therefore, the
proposed garage setback will be an improvement on the existing situation.
A turning area has been provided to facilitate vehicle movements.
Accordingly, the proposed setbacks are considered satisfactory.
3. Issues Raised in Submissions
The application was notified in accordance with Council’s policy and one submission was
received. The issue raised in the submission is addressed as follows:
ISSUE/OBJECTION COMMENT OUTCOME
Council needs to consider
whether it is suitable to
allow a secondary dwelling
as it will result in traffic
issues given that the
street is narrow and a cul-
de-sac.
The secondary dwelling is proposed
under the provisions of SEPP
(Affordable Rental Housing) 2009
and is a permissible development
under that instrument. St Aidans
Avenue is capable of
accommodating the negligible
increase in traffic that will result
from the secondary dwelling.
Issue addressed.
CONCLUSION
The application has been assessed against the provisions of Section 79C of the
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing)
2009 and Development Control Plan Part B Section 2- Residential and is considered
satisfactory.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 11
One submission was received and the concern raised in regard to traffic increase has
been addressed.
The application is recommended for approval subject to conditions.
IMPACTS
Financial
This matter has no direct financial impact upon Council's adopted budget or forward
estimates.
The Hills Future Community Strategic Plan
The proposed development is consistent with the planning principles, vision and
objectives outlined within “Hills 2026 – Looking Towards the Future” as the proposed
development provides for satisfactory urban growth without adverse environmental or
social amenity impacts and ensures a consistent built form is provided with respect to
the streetscape and general locality.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Application be approved subject to the following conditions of consent.
GENERAL MATTERS
1. Development in Accordance with Submitted Plans
The development being carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and
details, stamped and returned with this consent except where amended by other
conditions of consent.
REFERENCED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS
DRAWING NO. DESCRIPTION SHEET REVISION DATE
2009504 Site Plan 01 8 06/05/2015
2009504 Ground Floor Plan 02 - 20/01/2015
2009504 First Floor Plan 03 - 20/01/2015
2009504 Elevations 04 - 20/01/2015
2009504 Elevations 05 - 20/01/2015
2009504 Sections 6.1 - 20/01/2015
2009504 Schedules 6.2 - 20/01/2015
2009504 Granny Flat Plans 09 - 20/01/2015
2009504 Granny Flat- Notes 10 - 20/01/2015
2009504 Concept Landscape Plan 13 - 20/01/2015
No work (including excavation, land fill or earth reshaping) shall be undertaken prior to
the issue of the Construction Certificate, where a Construction Certificate is required.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 12
2. Construction Certificate
Prior to construction of the approved development, it is necessary to obtain a
Construction Certificate. A Construction Certificate may be issued by Council or an
Accredited Certifier. Plans submitted with the Construction Certificate are to be amended
to incorporate the conditions of the Development Consent.
3. Separate Application for Demolition
A separate application is required for the demolition of the existing dwelling.
4. Building Work to be in Accordance with BCA
All building work must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Building
Code of Australia.
5. Adherence to Waste Management Plan
All requirements of the Waste Management Plan submitted to and approved by Council
must be implemented during the construction and/ or demolition phases of the
development, as well as the ongoing management phase. The information submitted can
change provided that the same or a greater level of reuse and recycling is achieved as
detailed in the plan. Any material moved offsite is to be transported in accordance with
the requirements of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and only to a
place that can lawfully be used as a waste facility. Receipts of all waste/ recycling tipping
must be kept onsite at all times and produced in a legible form to any authorised officer
of the Council who asks to see them.
6. Management of Construction Waste
Waste materials must be appropriately stored and secured within a designated waste
area onsite at all times, prior to its reuse onsite or being sent offsite. This includes waste
materials such as paper and containers which must not litter the site or leave the site
onto neighbouring public or private property. A separate dedicated bin must be provided
onsite by the builder for the disposal of waste materials such as paper, containers and
food scraps generated by all workers. Building waste containers are not permitted to be
placed on public property at any time unless a separate application is approved by
Council to locate a building waste container in a public place. Any material moved offsite
is to be transported in accordance with the requirements of the Protection of the
Environment Operations Act 1997 and only to a place that can lawfully be used as a
waste facility. The separation and recycling of the following waste materials is required:
metals, timber, masonry products and clean waste plasterboard. This can be achieved by
source separation onsite, that is, a bin for metal waste, a bin for timber, a bin for bricks
and so on. Alternatively, mixed waste may be stored in one or more bins and sent to a
waste contractor or transfer/ sorting station that will sort the waste on their premises for
recycling. Receipts of all waste/ recycling tipping must be kept onsite at all times and
produced in a legible form to any authorised officer of the Council who asks to see them
7. Commencement of Domestic Waste Service
The property owner or agent acting for the owner must ensure to arrange the
commencement of a domestic waste service with Council. The service is to be arranged
no earlier than two days prior to occupancy and no later than two days after occupancy
of the development. All requirements of Council’s domestic collection service must be
complied with at all times. Please telephone Council on (02) 9843 0310 for the
commencement of waste services.
8. Provision of Domestic Waste Storage Area
Sufficient space must be allocated onsite to store a minimum of three 240 litre mobile
bins (for waste streams as determined by Council). Note two separate areas are required
for dual occupancies. The location is required to ensure that the bins are not visible from
any adjoining property or public place, are easily accessible by future occupants and
allow the bins to be wheeled to the street over flat or ramped surfaces, grade not to
exceed 1:14, and not over steps, kerbs, landscape edging or through a habitable area of
the dwelling.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 13
9. Tree Removal
Approval is granted for the removal of three trees as shown on the site plan prepared by
Masterton Homes, dated 6 May 2015 (revision 8).
All other trees are to remain and are to be protected during all works. Suitable
replacement trees are to be planted upon completion of construction.
10. Replacement Planting Requirements
To maintain the treed environment of the Shire three local provenance tube stock
advanced (25 litres) replacement trees from the following list are to be planted
elsewhere within the property.
Small mature size:
Angophora hispida Dwarf Apple
Acacia decurrens Sydney Green Wattle
Acacia falcata
Acacia implexa
Acacia parramattensis Parramatta Green Wattle
Acmena smithii Lilly Pilly
11. External Finishes
External finishes and colours shall be in accordance with the details submitted with the
development application and approved with this consent.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
12. Approved Plans to be Submitted to Sydney Water
The approved plans must be submitted to a Sydney Water Quick Check agent to
determine whether the development will affect any Sydney Water wastewater and water
mains, stormwater drains and/or easement, and if any requirements need to be met.
Plans will be appropriately stamped.
Please refer to the web site www.sydneywater.com.au for:
Quick Check agents details – See building and Developing then Quick Check
and
Guidelines for Building Over/Adjacent to /Sydney Water Assets – see Building and
Developing then Building and Renovating.
or telephone 13 20 92.
PRIOR TO WORK COMMENCING ON THE SITE
13. Principal Certifying Authority
A sign is to be erected in accordance with Clause 98 A (2) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Regulations 2000.
14. Builder and PCA Details Required
Notification in writing of the builder’s name, address, telephone and fax numbers to be
submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to work commencing.
Two days before work commences, Council shall be notified of the Principal Certifying
Authority in accordance with the Regulations.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 14
15. Management of Building Sites – Builder’s Details
The erection of suitable fencing or other measures to restrict public access to the site
and building works, materials or equipment when the building work is not in progress or
the site is otherwise unoccupied.
The erection of a sign, in a prominent position, stating that unauthorised entry to the
site is not permitted and giving an after hours contact name and telephone number. In
the case of a privately certified development, the name and contact number of the
Principal Certifying Authority.
16. Consultation with Service Authorities
Applicants are advised to consult with Telstra, NBN Co and Australia Post regarding the
installation of telephone conduits, broadband connections and letterboxes as required.
Unimpeded access must be available to the electricity supply authority, during and after
building, to the electricity meters and metering equipment.
The building plans must be submitted to the appropriate Sydney Water office to
determine whether the development will affect Sydney Water’s sewer and water mains,
stormwater drains and/or easements. If the development complies with Sydney Water’s
requirements, the building plans will be stamped indicating that no further requirements
are necessary.
17. Approved Temporary Closet
An approved temporary closet connected to the sewers of Sydney Water, or alternatively
an approved chemical closet is to be provided on the land, prior to building operations
being commenced.
18. Erosion and Sedimentation Controls
Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be in place prior to the commencement of site
works; and maintained throughout construction activities until the site is landscaped
and/or suitably revegetated. The controls shall be in accordance with the details
approved by Council and/or as directed by Council Officers. These requirements shall be
in accordance with Managing Urban Stormwater – Soils and Construction produced by
the NSW Department of Housing (Blue Book).
19. Stabilised Access Point
A stabilised all weather access point is to be provided prior to commencement of site
works, and maintained throughout construction activities until the site is stabilised. The
controls shall be in accordance with the requirements with the details approved by
Council and/or as directed by Council Officers. These requirements shall be in
accordance with Managing Urban Stormwater – Soils and Construction produced by the
NSW Department of Housing (Blue Book).
20. Protection of Existing Trees
The trees that are to be retained are to be protected during all works strictly in
accordance with AS4970- 2009 Protection of Trees on Development Sites.
At a minimum a 1.8m high chain-wire fence is to be erected at least three (3) metres
from the base of each tree and is to be in place prior to works commencing to restrict
the following occurring:
Stockpiling of materials within the root protection zone,
Placement of fill within the root protection zone,
Parking of vehicles within the root protection zone,
Compaction of soil within the root protection zone.
All areas within the root protection zone are to be mulched with composted leaf mulch to
a depth of not less than 100mm.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 15
A sign is to be erected indicating the trees are protected.
The installation of services within the root protection zone is not to be undertaken
without prior consent from Council.
DURING CONSTRUCTION
21. Hours of Work
Work on the project to be limited to the following hours: -
Monday to Saturday - 7.00am to 5.00pm;
No work to be carried out on Sunday or Public Holidays.
The builder/contractor shall be responsible to instruct and control sub-contractors
regarding the hours of work. Council will exercise its powers under the Protection of the
Environment Operations Act, in the event that the building operations cause noise to
emanate from the property on Sunday or Public Holidays or otherwise than between the
hours detailed above.
22. Dust Control
The emission of dust must be controlled to minimise nuisance to the occupants of the
surrounding premises. In the absence of any alternative measures, the following
measures must be taken to control the emission of dust:
Dust screens must be erected around the perimeter of the site and be kept in good
repair for the duration of the construction work;
All dusty surfaces must be wet down and suppressed by means of a fine water
spray. Water used for dust suppression must not cause water pollution; and
All stockpiles of materials that are likely to generate dust must be kept damp or
covered.
23. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Under clause 97A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a
condition of this Development Consent that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate
No. 615817M be complied with. Any subsequent version of this BASIX Certificate will
supersede all previous versions of the certificate.
A Section 96 Application may be required should the subsequent version of this BASIX
Certificate necessitate design changes to the development. However, a Section 96
Application will be required for a BASIX Certificate with a new number.
24. Compliance with Critical Stage Inspections and Other Inspections
Nominated by the Principal Certifying Authority
Section 109E(d) of the Act requires certain specific inspections (prescribed by Clause
162A of the Regulations) and known as “Critical Stage Inspections” to be carried out for
building work. Prior to permitting commencement of the work, your Principal Certifying
Authority is required to give notice of these inspections pursuant to Clause 103A of the
Regulations.
N.B. An Occupation Certificate cannot be issued and the building may not be able to be
used or occupied where any mandatory critical stage inspections or other inspections
required by the Principal Certifying Authority are not carried out.
Where Council is nominated as Principal Certifying Authority, notification of all
inspections required is provided with the Construction Certificate approval.
NOTE: You are advised that inspections may only be carried out by the PCA
unless by prior agreement of the PCA and subject to that person being an
accredited certifier.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 16
25. Roof Water Drainage
Gutter and downpipe and/or rainwater tank overflow, to be provided and connected to
an approved lawful discharge point (ie. kerb, inter-allotment drainage easement or OSD)
upon installation of roof coverings.
26. Swimming Pool Safety Fencing
All pools and safety barriers are to comply with the Swimming Pools Act 1992, the
Swimming Pools Regulation 2008 and Australian Standard 1926.1-2012. A fact sheet
titled Swimming Pool Fencing Requirements is available from www.thehills.nsw.gov.au.
27. Resuscitation Warning Notice
In accordance with the Swimming Pools Regulation 2008, a Warning Notice is to be
displayed in a prominent position, in the immediate vicinity of the swimming pool. The
notice is to contain a diagrammatic flow chart of resuscitation techniques, the words:
(i) "YOUNG CHILDREN SHOULD BE SUPERVISED WHEN USING THIS SWIMMING POOL",
and
(ii) "POOL GATES MUST BE KEPT CLOSED AT ALL TIMES", and
(iii) "KEEP ARTICLES, OBJECTS AND STRUCTURES AT LEAST 900 MILLIMETRES CLEAR
OF THE POOL FENCE AT ALL TIMES",
and all other details required by the Regulation.
PRIOR TO ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
28. Registration of Swimming Pool
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the swimming pool/spa is to be registered on
the NSW state register of swimming pools and spas. To register the swimming pool you
are to log onto www.swimmingpoolregister.nsw.gov.au and follow the prompts. A copy
of the registration certificate is to be submitted to the PCA to confirm the registration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Locality Plan
2. Aerial Photograph
3. Site Plan
4. Primary Dwelling Elevations
5. Secondary Dwelling Elevations
6. Landscaping Plan
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 17
ATTACHMENT 1 – LOCALITY PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 18
ATTACHMENT 2 – AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 19
ATTACHMENT 3 – SITE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 20
ATTACHMENT 4 – PRIMARY DWELLING
ELEVATIONS
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 21
ATTACHMENT 5 – SECONDARY DWELLING
ELEVATIONS
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 22
ATTACHMENT 6 – LANDSCAPE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 23
ITEM-3 DA NO. 1128/2015/HA - WHOLESALE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS (TRIFORCE SPORTS) - LOT 14 SP 77109 -
41/24-32 LEXINGTON DRIVE, BELLA VISTA
THEME: Balanced Urban Growth
OUTCOME: 7 Responsible planning facilitates a desirable living
environment and meets growth targets.
STRATEGY:
7.2 Manage new and existing development with a robust
framework of policies, plans and processes that is in
accordance with community needs and expectations.
MEETING DATE: 26/05/2015
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT
AUTHOR: TOWN PLANNER
HENRY BURNETT
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: MANAGER DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT
PAUL OSBORNE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Development Application is for the use of Unit 41 for a wholesale supplies business
known as Triforce Sports which specialises in the sale of sporting goods. The use is
currently operating without consent.
The use is most appropriately defined as a shop under LEP 2012 which is prohibited in
the B7 Business Park zone. Wholesale supply businesses by definition only allow
wholesale sale to business. The Statement in support of the application acknowledges
retail sale. The layout of the premises, manner in which goods are sold, displayed and
advertised all demonstrate the use is most appropriately categorised as a shop. The use
is therefore prohibited under LEP 2012.
The Development Application is recommended for refusal.
BACKGROUND MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
Applicant: Mr H Aly
1. LEP 2012 - Unsatisfactory
Owner: Talbree Pty Ltd 2. Section 79C (EP&A Act) –
Unsatisfactory
Zoning: B7 Business Park
3. Section 94 Contribution – N/A
Area: 338 m²
Existing Development: Triforce Sports
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 24
SUBMISSIONS REASONS FOR REFERRAL TO DAU
1. Exhibition: Not required.
1. Recommended for Refusal
2. Notice Adj Owners: Yes, 14 days.
3. Number Advised: Eight
4. Submissions
Received:
Nil POLITICAL DONATION – None disclosed
HISTORY
23/09/2011 Development Application 224/2012/HA approved for a cricket
training facility in Unit 157.
05/08/2015 A Notice of Intention to Give an Order was served by Council
Staff requiring that the use of Unit 41 as a retail premises
cease.
24/09/2014 Development Application 424/2015/HA lodged for use of the
subject premises as a showroom/ wholesale sports store.
07/10/2014 Letter sent from the Assessing Officer requesting that the
applicant withdraw Development Application 424/2015/HA as
the use as undertaken was a shop.
08/01/2015 Development Application 424/2015/HA withdrawn.
02/03/2015 An Order was issued to Triforce Sports to cease the use of the
premises as a retail premises.
13/03/2015 Subject Development Application lodged.
PROPOSAL
The Development Application seeks consent for the use of Unit 41 for a wholesale
supplies business known as Triforce Sports which specialises in the sales of sporting
goods. Unit 41 is located on the podium level of an industrial/commercial complex and
has a gross floor area of 201 square metres at the podium level with a mezzanine area
of 110 square metres.
The Statement of Environmental Effects (SEE) describes the use as selling bulky sports
equipment and memorabilia with 80% of the sales being wholesale to people with
Australian Business Numbers and some ancillary retailing to individuals without an
Australian Business Number.
Triforce Sports operates a warehouse and training facility within Units 154 to 157 of the
same industrial/commercial complex which is detached from Unit 41.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 25
ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Compliance with LEP 2012
(i) Permissibility
In order for a Development Application to be considered it must be demonstrated that
the proposed land use is permissible within the prescribed zoning. The subject property
is within an area zoned B7 Business Park. The applicant states that the use is ‘wholesale
supplies’ which is permissible in the B7 zone. However, it is considered that the
predominant use is most appropriately defined as a shop which is prohibited in the B7
zone.
The submitted Statement Environmental Effects states that the use is ‘wholesale
supplies’ which is defined in LEP 2012 as follows:
Wholesale supplies means a building or place used for the display, sale or hire
of goods or materials by wholesale only to businesses that have an Australian
Business Number registered under the A New Tax System (Australian Business
Number) Act 1999 of the Commonwealth.
The submitted Statement of Environmental Effects (SEE) describes the use as selling
bulky sports equipment and memorabilia. It states that 80% of the sales are wholesale
to people with Australian Business Numbers and acknowledges there is some ancillary
retailing occurring to individuals without an Australian Business Number. It further states
that the premises are part of a warehouse and cricket training facility within the same
commercial complex and that the wholesale supplies premises performs administration
functions for these facilities.
The description of the use contained within the SEE is inconsistent with the definition of
a wholesale supplies business. The definition of wholesale supplies permits retailing to
businesses with Australian Business Numbers only. The SEE states that there is retailing
occurring to individuals without an ABN which is inconsistent with the definition of
wholesale supplies.
Further, it is considered that the description of the use contained within the SEE does
not make clear the type of goods available. A site inspection and review of online
advertising has revealed that Triforce Sports sells a range of sports products including
sports jerseys, fitness apparel and tennis equipment (see Attachment 3).
The use is most appropriately defined as a shop which is a type of retail premises. Retail
premises and shops are defined under LEP 2012 as follows:
Retail premises means a building or place used for the purpose of selling items
by retail, or hiring or displaying items for the purpose of selling them or hiring
them out, whether the items are goods or materials (or whether also sold by
wholesale).
Shop means a premises that sell merchandise such as groceries, personal care
products, clothing, music, homewares, stationary, electrical goods or the like or
that hire any such merchandise, and includes a neighbourhood shop, but does not
include food and drink premises or restricted premises.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 26
A characteristic of retail premises is that they include the retail sale of items whether or
not they are also sold by wholesale. Although a portion of Triforce sales may be by
wholesale, the use is still appropriately categorised as a retail premises as it also
includes retail sales. Retailing of this nature is not in line with the objectives of the B7
Business Park zone and retail premises (including shops) are prohibited in the zone
under LEP 2012. Retailing of the nature proposed is more appropriate in areas where
shops are permissible such as the B1 Neighbourhood Centre, B2 Local Centre or B4
Mixed Use zones. It is noted that bulky goods retailing is also prohibited in the B7
Business Park zone.
The SEE states that the premises is ancillary to a warehouse and training facility within
the same complex inferring that it is ancillary to a permissible use and therefore
satisfactory. The premises is a separate allotment within the Strata Plan and is separated
physically from the warehouse and training facility. As such, the use cannot be
considered ancillary as there is nothing ensuring the premises remains an ancillary use
in perpetuity. Additionally, the scale of the premises would be beyond that which would
be reasonably considered to be subservient to the training facility.
The use is therefore a prohibited use within the B7 Business Park zone. The association
of the use to the warehouse and training facility does not make it a permissible use. As a
result, the subject application is recommended for refusal.
(ii) Zone Objectives – B7 Business Park
The objectives of the B7 Business Park zone are as follows:
• To provide a range of office and light industrial uses.
• To encourage employment opportunities.
• To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to
day needs of workers in the area. • To make provision for high technology industries that use and develop advanced
technologies, products and processes.
The B7 Business Park zone aims to provide a range of office and light industrial uses.
The proposal is not an orderly use of land as it reduces the availability of floor area for
office and light industrial uses within the B7 Business Park zone. Reducing the amount of
floor area available for office and light industrial uses impacts negatively upon
employment opportunities within those sectors. The location of a shop within the B7
Business Park zone also impacts negatively upon the integrity of zones where shops are
permissible such as the B1 Neighbourhood Centre, B2 Local Centre or B4 Mixed Use
zones.
The B7 Business Park zone also aims to enable other land uses that provide facilities or
services to meet the day to day needs of workers in the area. The range of uses that fit
this criteria is limited and includes services and neighbourhood shops. Services include
banks, post offices, hair dressers and dry cleaners. Neighbourhood shops are
characterised by the sale of foodstuffs, personal care products, newspapers and the like,
and are limited to no more than 100 m2. A shop for the sale of sporting goods does not
fall within the scope of uses that meet the day to day needs of workers in the area.
The proposal is unsatisfactory with respect to the objectives of the B7 Business Park
zone.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 27
CONCLUSION
The Development Application has been assessed against Section 79C of the
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and The Hills Local Environmental
Plan 2012 and is considered unsatisfactory. The proposal is prohibited in the B7 Business
Park zone under LEP 2012.
The Development Application is recommended for refusal.
IMPACTS
Financial
This matter may have a direct financial impact upon Council’s adopted budget as refusal
of this matter may result in Council having to defend a Class 1 Appeal in the NSW Land
and Environment Court.
The Hills Future Community Strategic Plan
The environmental and social impacts where appropriate have been identified and
addressed in the report. The proposal is not considered consistent with The Hills Future
Community Strategic Plan as the use does not contribute to the orderly and envisaged
use of this part of the Norwest Business Park.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Application be refused for the following reasons:
1. The proposal is a retail shop which is prohibited within the B7 Business Park zone
under Part 2 of The Hills LEP 2012
(Section 79C(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).
2. The proposal is inconsistent with the objectives of the B7 Business Park zone as it
reduces floor area and employment opportunities for office or light industrial use
(Section 79C(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).
3. The proposal is not in the public interest as it does not result in the orderly
development of land within the Shire.
(Section 79C(1)(e) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).
ATTACHMENTS
1. Locality Plan
2. Aerial Photograph
3. Site Photographs
4. Online Advertising
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 28
ATTACHMENT 1 – LOCALITY PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 29
ATTACHMENT 2 – AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 30
ATTACHMENT 3 – SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph 1: Store from Podium Level
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 31
Photograph 2 and 3: Products for Sale
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 32
P
Photograph 4 and 5: Products for Sale
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 33
ATTACHMENT 4 – ONLINE ADVERTISING
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 34
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 35
ITEM-4 DA NO. 907/2015/HA - CONSTRUCTION OF A PART
TWO, PART THREE STOREY DWELLING WITH
ATTACHED SECONDARY DWELLING AND IN-
GROUND SWIMMING POOL - LOT 1 DP 600391, NO.
418 OLD NORTHERN ROAD, GLENHAVEN
THEME: Balanced Urban Growth
OUTCOME: 7 Responsible planning facilitates a desirable living
environment and meets growth targets.
STRATEGY:
7.2 Manage new and existing development with a robust
framework of policies, plans and processes that is in
accordance with community needs and expectations.
MEETING DATE: 26/05/2015
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT
AUTHOR: TOWN PLANNER
JENNIFER WILLIAMS
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE PLANNER
KRISTINE MCKENZIE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Development Application is for the construction of a part two, part three storey
dwelling with triple garage including an attached secondary dwelling and inground
swimming pool.
The proposal achieves compliance with Development Control Plan (DCP) Residential with
the exception of battle-axe building setbacks, site coverage and solar access. The DCP
requires dwellings located on battleaxe allotments to be set back a minimum distance to
three sides only of the lot of 6m for the 2 and 3 storey elements. The proposed dwelling
requires a variation to the north boundary to the upper floor which provides a 4.2 metre
setback. The DCP permits a maximum 30% site coverage to the lot. The proposed site
coverage is 54.59%. The DCP also requires at least 50% of the required private open
space within the subject property and on adjoining properties to receive direct sunlight
for a minimum of four hours between 9am and 3pm on 21 June. This is not achieved to
an adjoining lot to the south due to lot orientation and topography. The proposed DCP
variations are considered satisfactory as the dwelling will have a reasonable impact on
visual privacy, stormwater management and the amenity of the surrounding area.
The proposal was notified to adjoining property owners for a period of 14 days and one
submission was received. The issues raised in the submission relate to building height,
solar access, privacy, views and amenity. The proposal is considered satisfactory given
that the original plans have been amended to reduce the building height and provide
privacy screening to relevant areas of the dwelling. The applicant, through use of
multiple shadow diagrams illustrated that the additional overshadowing impact by the
dwelling is a result of the topography of the land and lot orientation rather than poor
design. The design of the dwelling is considered to be compatible with the existing
character of the residential area.
The Development Application is recommended for approval.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 36
BACKGROUND MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
Applicant: M Akbarian and H
Akbarian
1. LEP 2012 - Permissible with consent.
Owner: M Akbarian 2. DCP Part B Section 2 – Residential –
Variations required, see report.
Zoning: E4 Environmental
Living
3. Section 79C (EP&A Act) –
Satisfactory
Area: 1803m2 4. Section 94A Contribution –
$11,815.10
Existing Development: Vacant lot.
SUBMISSIONS REASONS FOR REFERRAL TO DAU
1. Exhibition: Not required.
1. Variations to DCP.
2. Notice Adj Owners: Yes, 14 days
2. Submission received.
3. Number Advised: Ten
4. Submissions
Received:
One POLITICAL DONATION – None disclosed.
HISTORY
16/01/2015 Subject Development Application lodged.
09/02/2015 Letter sent to the applicant requesting additional information
with respect to a reduction in building height, reduction to fill,
details of swimming pool and gazebo, BASIX Certificate
compliance and amendments to plans to address visual privacy.
02/03/2015
Meeting held with applicant to discuss proposed amendments to
plans and additional information required.
19/03/2015 Part amended plans and additional information submitted.
24/03/2015 Email sent to applicant requesting outstanding information to
address original issues raised.
22/04/2015 Amended plans and arborist report submitted.
06/05/2015
Amended BASIX Certificate submitted.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 37
PROPOSAL
The Development Application is for the construction of a three storey dwelling with triple
garage including an attached secondary dwelling and inground swimming pool.
The proposed development will result in a principal dwelling with five bedrooms, five
bathrooms, a triple garage, an in-ground swimming pool and detached gazebo. The
attached secondary dwelling contains one bedroom, one bathroom and a living area.
The proposed building materials are rendered brick, travertine stone cladding, timber,
Alucabond façade panelling and concrete. The proposed colour scheme is grey, cream,
white and brown.
The site is located within an established street and the adjoining dwellings contain a
variety of one and two storey dwellings. The subject lot is a battle-axe lot and the
driveway from Old Northern Road is also proposed. The site has a cross fall of
approximately six metres from the north-east to the south-west lot boundaries. The
proposal requires the removal of one tree to provide the new driveway however the
remaining five trees located on the property will be retained.
ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Compliance with Local Environmental Plan 2012
The proposal includes an attached secondary dwelling which contains one bedroom, one
bathroom and a living area.
The proposal has been assessed against the objectives of the E4 Environmental Living
zone and Clause 5.4 (9) – Secondary Dwellings in Local Environmental Plan 2012.
Compliance is demonstrated in the table below.
LEP Requirement Proposal Compliance
Floor area of secondary
dwelling must not exceed
60m² or 20% of the floor
area of the principle dwelling,
whichever is the greater.
Floor area of proposed secondary
dwelling is 59.4m².
Yes
E4 Environmental Living zone
applies to the subject lot.
Secondary dwellings are
permissible within E4
Environmental Living zones under
LEP 2012.
Yes
The proposal achieves compliance with the relevant development standards for the
proposed development and satisfies the objectives of the E4 Environmental Living zone.
The proposed development is satisfactory with regards to Local Environmental Plan
2012.
2. Compliance with Development Control Plan Part B Section 2 - Residential
The proposal has been assessed against the following provisions of Development Control
Plan (DCP) Part B Section 2 – Residential. The proposed development achieves
compliance with the relevant requirements of the DCP with the exception of the
following:
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 38
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD
DCP
REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT
COMPLIANCE
Building
Setbacks
Battleaxe allotment
dwellings shall be
set back a minimum
distance to three
sides only of the lot
of 4m for the single
storey element and
6m for the 2 and 3
storey elements.
The north boundary
contains an
encroachment to the
first floor where the
minimum setback is
4.2m increasing to
6m over the 12.3m
long portion of the
dwelling within the
setback area.
No, however the
encroachment does
not contribute to
privacy or
overshadowing
impacts and is
considered
satisfactory.
Site Coverage Maximum site
coverage permitted
to the lot is 30%
(E4 Environmental
Living zone).
Proposed site
coverage is 54.59%
No, however the
proposed site
coverage is compatible
with the site coverage
on surrounding lots.
Solar Access At least 50% of the
required private
open space within
the subject property
and that on
adjoining properties,
is to receive direct
sunlight for a
minimum of 4 hours
between 9am and
3pm on 21 June.
The adjoining
property to the south
(8 Cromerty Place)
will not receive the
minimum solar access
requirement.
This property will
receive solar access
to a small portion of
the backyard between
9am and 11am on 21
June only.
No, however due to
the south-east
orientation of the
adjoining lot and the
topography of the site,
compliance is not
possible. The
additional shadow
impact created by the
proposed dwelling is
minor when compared
to the existing shadow
cast generated by the
boundary fence.
(i) Building Setbacks
The DCP requires battleaxe lots to provide setbacks to three sides of the lot of 4 metres
to single storey elements and 6 metres to two and three storey elements. The proposed
dwelling provides compliant setbacks to the east and west boundaries. The proposed
north boundary setback encroaches the 6 metre upper floor setback providing a
minimum setback of 4.2 metres (See Attachment 3).
The applicant has provided the following justification for the building setback variation:
The plans indicate that the setbacks are fully compliant except for a very small portion
of the north eastern corner of the dwelling building. This is insignificant given the
location of this corner on the site and its distance to the nearest dwelling to the north.
Comment:
The DCP provides the following objectives in relation to building setbacks:-
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 39
(i) To provide setbacks that complements the streetscape and protects the privacy
and sunlight to adjacent dwellings in accordance with ESD Objective 7.
(ii) To ensure that new development is sensitive to the landscape setting, site
constraints and established character of the street and locality.
(iii) To ensure that the appearance of new development is of a high visual quality and
enhances the streetscape.
The proposed development will result in a variation to the battleaxe setback
requirements providing a minimum 4.2 metre setback to a small portion of the first floor
adjoining the northern boundary. It is noted that the ground floor setback complies with
the DCP requirements.
The proposed variations do not contribute to privacy or solar access impacts on adjoining
lots. The proposed dwelling design provides articulation to the northern elevation which
results in high quality design to contribute to the surrounding amenity. The variations
are considered satisfactory as they result in negligible additional impacts to adjoining
properties.
The proposed setbacks are satisfactory in this instance and can be supported.
(ii) Site Coverage
The DCP permits maximum 30% site coverage for land zoned E4 Environmental Living.
The proposed development results in a site coverage of 54.59% which exceeds the
control by 24.59%.
The applicant has provided the following justification for the site coverage variation:
The recalculated site coverage calculation excluding the access handle is 54.59%. We
note that the maximum site coverage permitted in residential zones is 60% with the
exception of land zoned E4 Environmental Living and land identified in the Map Sheets
by pink shading, where the maximum site coverage is 30%.
We cannot see any reason or attributes of the site as to why it is zoned E4. It is most
likely that it is a result of the direct translation (like for like zones) from the former LEP
to the standard instrument LEP. Even so, the environmental quality of Old Northern
Road in this locality has been eroded over time and the site is more closely associated in
character and proximity with the R2 land.
The vacant site maintains no significant vegetation excluding some established gum trees
that line the access handle. The site is not affected by land slip, biodiversity, acid sulphate
soils or any other significant environmental affectation.
Significantly, the proposed site coverage is compliant with the site coverage required
for the surrounding R2 zone with which the site shares its characteristics.
It is reasonable and appropriate to allow flexibility to the site coverage control on a site
that that exhibits no significant environmental constraints and which is otherwise
surrounded by developed residential land.
Comment:
The DCP provides the following objectives in relation to site coverage:-
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 40
(i) To maximise the provision of open space.
(ii) To avoid the creation of drainage and runoff problems, through minimising the
amount of impervious area in accordance with Council’s ESD Objective 3.
(iii) To minimise bulk and scale of development.
(iv) To facilitate spatial separation between buildings.
(v) To provide for adequate landscaped area.
(vi) Maintain the character of existing areas by retaining vegetation.
The lot has been zoned E4 Environmental Living to protect the view lines from Old
Northern Road towards the west. The proposed development is located on a battle axe
allotment that slopes away from Old Northern Road and will not significantly hinder the
existing view lines from Old Northern Road. Sites typically zoned E4 Environmental
Living generally contain ecological, scientific or aesthetic values. The subject site does
not contain any threatened or significant ecology. The proposed development requires
the removal of one tree only with the remaining five trees on the lot to be retained. It
also noted that the proposed landscaped area of 45.41% of the lot provides deep soil
areas to allow establishment of landscape planting.
The subject lot adjoins properties that are zoned R2 Low Density Residential which
permits a maximum site coverage of up to 60%. In addition, the subject lot is
comparable in land area to adjoining lots zoned E4 Environmental Living that contain
similar areas of site coverage. The proposed site coverage and building footprint is
considered comparable with the adjoining lots in both R2 and E4 zonings.
As detailed by the applicant above, the site contains no environmental constraints that
would require minimal development to the lot. As such, the proposed development and
site coverage variation is considered satisfactory as it continues to provide sufficient
open space and building separation whilst retaining the majority of the existing trees on
the lot.
(iii) Solar Access
The DCP requires at least 50% of the required private open space within the subject
property and on adjoining properties is to receive direct sunlight for a minimum of 4
hours between 9am and 3pm on 21 June. The subject lot and adjoining lots achieve this
requirement with the exception of the adjoining lot to the south known as No. 8
Cromerty Place. It is noted that No. 8 Cromerty Place is currently overshadowed by the
existing boundary fencing however the proposed dwelling will result in an increase to the
overshadowing of the adjoining lot.
The shadow diagrams below detail the existing shadow from the boundary fence and is
compared with the shadow created by the proposed dwelling.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 41
Existing Shadow 21 June 9am Proposed Shadow 21 June 9am
Existing Shadow 21 June 12 Noon Proposed Shadow 21 June 12 Noon
Existing Shadow 21 June 3pm Proposed Shadow 21 June 3pm
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 42
The applicant has provided the following justification for the solar access variation:
No. 8 Crometry Place is erected on a significant downward slope running north to south
and the rear yard and rear private open space of that dwelling is some 6m below the
existing ground level along the common boundary with the subject site. It is also evident
that the dividing fence along contributes to a significant amount of shadow impact before
the proposed development of the subject site.
Shadow studies have now been carried out and are submitted which show:-
-The shadow impact of the existing dividing fence demonstrating existing non-
compliant solar access to the rear of 8 Cromerty Place during the winter solstice.
-The shadow impact from the proposed reduced dwelling design showing slightly
increased shadow impact.
Shadow impacts of the proposed dwelling were explored if it were moved to 1500mm
from the northern boundary. Importantly, these diagrams show that there is very little
tangible benefit to be gained from moving the building northwards. If the building
were to be moved northwards to improve the solar access to the neighbouring dwelling it
would actually reduce the solar access to the proposed dwelling. On balance this would
not be the most appropriate planning outcome. I consider the exercise illustrates that
the application as revised, minimises shadow impact as far as is practicable having
regard to the orientation of the subdivision, the topography of the land and the way
the neighbouring dwelling has been designed and constructed.
Comment:
The DCP provides the following objectives in relation to solar access:-
(i) To maximise solar access to internal living spaces within buildings and open space
areas in winter.
(ii) To ensure no adverse overshadowing of adjoining allotments/developments
including the principal area of open space.
(iii) To orient the development in a way that best allows for appropriate solar access
and shading, to ensure energy efficient outcomes in accordance with Council’s
ESD objective 5.
(iv) To minimise the need for artificial lighting in dwellings during the day, to ensure
energy efficient outcomes in accordance with Council’s ESD objective 5.
(v) To orientate dwellings so that the living areas face north.
The proposed dwelling has a 4.3m setback to the southern boundary which exceeds the
DCP requirement of 900mm. The proposal dwelling has a height of 8.914m which is
below the LEP height limit of 9m. The proposed design of the dwelling has incorporated a
maximum of 4.6m of cut to reduce the height and bulk of the dwelling.
The applicant submitted additional separate shadow diagrams for assessment which
considered the result of relocating the dwelling to have a 1.5m northern boundary
setback ie: a decrease from the 4.2m setback currently proposed. This resulted in a
continued solar access variation to No. 8 Cromerty Place in addition to further
overshadowing to the subject lot. Due to the solar access outcome for both properties,
the proposed dwelling has been maintained centrally within the subject lot.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 43
The proposed development has had regard to the planning principle adopted under The
Benevolent Society v Waverly Council [(2010) NSWLEC 1082] relating to access to
sunlight. Overshadowing arising out of poor design is not considered an issue for the
proposed development. The proposed development provides compliance with the design
controls relating to building height in addition to the building setbacks required for battle
axe allotments. The proposed dwelling design is cut in approximately 4.6m to reduce the
bulk and scale impact on surrounding properties. The principle also indicates there are
sites that are highly vulnerable to being overshadowed which is the case with the
adjoining lot to the south due to the topography of the land and the lot orientation with
respect to the northerly aspect.
While the applicant could consider an alternate design and provide a reduced building
platform or single storey dwelling design, the LEP height limit has been achieved. The
properties to the south are affected by steep level changes and are located below the
existing ground level of the existing lot. Due to the level changes, solar access can only
be maintained at current levels to No. 8 Cromerty Place by limiting development on the
subject lot. The photograph below shows the adjoining roofline of No. 8 Cromerty Place
in proximity to the height of the boundary fence to demonstrate the level changes. The
proposed dwelling utilises 4.6m of cut to the lower ground level to reduce the building
height where possible. As a result, the proposed development is considered satisfactory
as the development is compatible with development in the surrounding area.
Photo: South facing towards 8 Cromerty Place
Whilst the proposal reduces the solar access to the adjoining property, in this instance
the site topography, existing levels and existing fencing all contribute to the existing
solar access. The proposed dwelling will further reduce solar access, however on balance
this is considered satisfactory.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 44
3. Issues Raised in Submission
The proposal was notified to adjoining property owners and one submission was
received. The issues raised in the submission are summarised below.
ISSUE/OBJECTION COMMENT OUTCOME
The size and height of
the proposed dwelling
creates overshadowing to
adjoining lots.
The proposed dwelling has a maximum
building height of 8.914m and complies
with the LEP height limit of 9m.
The overshadowing created is in part
due to the orientation of the lot and the
natural topography of the land. The
design cannot effectively reduce
overshadowing to the adjoining lots
without being significantly restricted in
building height and size which is
considered to be unreasonable.
See comments in Section 2 above.
Issue addressed.
The size, height and
location of the proposed
dwelling results in
privacy impacts to
adjoining properties and
results in impacts to
lifestyles.
The original plans have been amended
to provide 3.5m high privacy screens to
balconies and terraces where
overlooking may occur. In addition
windows have been modified to
highlight or narrow windows to
minimise overlooking to adjoining lots.
Privacy impacts by the proposed
development have been assessed and
are considered satisfactory.
Issue addressed.
The height of the
proposed dwelling is not
compatible with the
existing surrounding
residential area.
The proposed three storey dwelling
includes a partially excavated lower
ground floor. The original plans have
been amended to lower the building
height. The proposed height is a
maximum 8.914m which is under the
LEP limit of 9m.
The proposed dwelling is considered
compatible with surrounding
development with regard to building
height.
Issue addressed.
BUILDING SURVEYOR’S COMMENTS
No objections are raised to the proposal subject to conditions.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
No objections are raised to the proposal subject to conditions.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 45
TREE MANAGEMENT COMMENTS
No objections are raised to the proposal subject to conditions.
CONCLUSION
The proposed development has been assessed against the relevant heads of
consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act,
1979, The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012 and Development Control Plan Part B
Section 2- Residential and is considered satisfactory.
The proposal includes variations to battle-axe allotment building setbacks, site coverage
and solar access which are considered to be reasonable in this instance. One submission
was received raising issues regarding building height, solar access, privacy, views and
amenity that have been addressed in the body of this report.
Approval is recommended subject to conditions.
IMPACTS
Financial
This matter has no direct financial impact upon Council's adopted budget or forward
estimates.
The Hills Future Community Strategic Plan
The proposed development is consistent with the planning principles, vision and
objectives outlined within “Hills 2026 – Looking Towards the Future” as the proposed
development provides for satisfactory urban growth without adverse environmental or
social amenity impacts and ensures a consistent built form is provided with respect to
the streetscape and general locality.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Application be approved subject to the following conditions of consent.
GENERAL MATTERS
1. Development in Accordance with Submitted Plans (as amended)
The development being carried out in accordance with the approved plans and details
submitted to Council, as amended in red, stamped and returned with this consent.
The amendments in red require a 1.6m high privacy screen to the north side of the
gazebo walkway on the approved Site Plan and correct the Reduced Level to the Laundry
on the Lower Floor Plan to RL 177.40.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 46
REFERENCED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS
DRAWING NO. DESCRIPTION REVISION DATE
A00 Site Analysis, Site Plan, Landscape Plan,
Erosion Control Plan, Concept Drainage
Plan (as amended)
D 21/04/2015
A01 Lower Floor & Ground Floor Plans &
Sediment Control Details (as amended)
C 10/04/2015
A02 First Floor & Roof plans C 10/04/2015
A03 Elevations C 10/04/2015
A04 Sections & Pool Gazebo Elevations D 21/04/2015
- Schedule of Finishes (two pages) - -
No work (including excavation, land fill or earth reshaping) shall be undertaken prior to
the issue of the Construction Certificate, where a Construction Certificate is required.
2. Tree Removal
Approval is granted for the removal of one Eucalyptus pilularis located within proposed
driveway as shown on site plan prepared by MLR Architects dated 21/04/15.
All other trees are to remain and are to be protected during all works. Suitable
replacement trees are to be planted upon completion of construction.
3. Replacement Planting Requirements
To maintain the treed environment of the Shire one advanced (45 litres) replacement
trees from the following list are to be planted elsewhere within the property.
Syncarpia glomulifera Turpentine
Eucalyptus pilularis Blackbutt
4. External Finishes
External finishes and colours shall be in accordance with the details submitted with the
development application and approved with this consent.
5. Retention of Trees
All trees not specifically identified on the approved plans for removal are to be retained
with remedial work to be carried out in accordance with the Arborist report prepared by
Robert Polaris dated 16/04/15.
All Pool and gazebo construction within the Tree protection zone of the
neighbouring Celtis sinensis tree is to be constructed using concrete piering
method with a floating slab.
Any pruning to accommodate the height of proposed gazebo must be carried out
in accordance with AS4373-2007 by a minimum Level 3 Arborist.
6. Protection of Public Infrastructure
Council must be notified of any damage to public infrastructure caused by the
development. Adequate protection must be provided prior to work commencing and
maintained during building operations. Any damage caused must be made good, to the
satisfaction of Council, before an Occupation Certificate can be issued. Public
infrastructure includes the road pavement, kerb and gutter, concrete footpaths, drainage
structures, utilities and landscaping fronting the site.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 47
7. Gutter and Footpath Crossing Application
Each driveway requires the lodgement of a separate gutter and footpath crossing
application, accompanied by the applicable fee as per Council’s Schedule of Fees and
Charges.
8. Minor Engineering Works
The design and construction of the engineering works listed below must be provided for
in accordance with the following documents and requirements:
a) Council’s Design Guidelines Subdivisions/ Developments
b) Council’s Works Specifications Subdivisions/ Developments
Any variance from these documents requires separate approval from Council.
Works on existing public roads or any other land under the care and control of Council
must be approved and inspected by Council in accordance with the Roads Act 1993 or
the Local Government Act 1993. A separate minor engineering works application and
inspection fee is payable as per Council’s Schedule of Fees and Charges.
i. Driveway Requirements
The design, finish, gradient and location of all driveway crossings must comply with the
above documents and Council’s Driveway Specifications.
- The proposed driveways must be built to Council’s residential standard. Note that the
minimum width of the formed driveway required is 3.0m, and the maximum grade is
22%.
A separate driveway application fee is payable as per Council’s Schedule of Fees and
Charges.
ii. Disused Layback/ Driveway Removal
All disused laybacks and driveways must be removed and replaced with kerb and gutter
together with the restoration and turfing of the adjoining footpath verge area.
iii. Site Stormwater Drainage
The entire site area must be graded, collected and drained by pits and pipes to a suitable
point of legal discharge.
iv. Earthworks/ Site Regrading
Earthworks are limited to that shown on the approved plans. Where earthworks are not
shown on the approved plan the topsoil within lots must not be disturbed.
9. Construction Certificate
Prior to construction of the approved development, it is necessary to obtain a
Construction Certificate. A Construction Certificate may be issued by Council or an
Accredited Certifier. Plans submitted with the Construction Certificate are to be amended
to incorporate the conditions of the Development Consent.
10. Building Work to be in Accordance with BCA
All building work must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Building
Code of Australia.
11. Adherence to Waste Management Plan
All requirements of the Waste Management Plan submitted to and approved by Council
must be implemented during the construction and/ or demolition phases of the
development, as well as the ongoing management phase. The information submitted can
change provided that the same or a greater level of reuse and recycling is achieved as
detailed in the plan. Any material moved offsite is to be transported in accordance with
the requirements of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and only to a
place that can lawfully be used as a waste facility. Receipts of all waste/ recycling tipping
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 48
must be kept onsite at all times and produced in a legible form to any authorised officer
of the Council who asks to see them.
12. Management of Construction Waste
Waste materials must be appropriately stored and secured within a designated waste
area onsite at all times, prior to its reuse onsite or being sent offsite. This includes waste
materials such as paper and containers which must not litter the site or leave the site
onto neighbouring public or private property. A separate dedicated bin must be provided
onsite by the builder for the disposal of waste materials such as paper, containers and
food scraps generated by all workers. Building waste containers are not permitted to be
placed on public property at any time unless a separate application is approved by
Council to locate a building waste container in a public place. Any material moved offsite
is to be transported in accordance with the requirements of the Protection of the
Environment Operations Act 1997 and only to a place that can lawfully be used as a
waste facility. The separation and recycling of the following waste materials is required:
metals, timber, masonry products and clean waste plasterboard. This can be achieved by
source separation onsite, that is, a bin for metal waste, a bin for timber, a bin for bricks
and so on. Alternatively, mixed waste may be stored in one or more bins and sent to a
waste contractor or transfer/ sorting station that will sort the waste on their premises for
recycling. Receipts of all waste/ recycling tipping must be kept onsite at all times and
produced in a legible form to any authorised officer of the Council who asks to see them
13. Commencement of Domestic Waste Service
The property owner or agent acting for the owner must ensure to arrange the
commencement of a domestic waste service with Council. The service is to be arranged
no earlier than two days prior to occupancy and no later than two days after occupancy
of the development. All requirements of Council’s domestic collection service must be
complied with at all times. Please telephone Council on (02) 9843 0310 for the
commencement of waste services.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
14. Approved Plans to be Submitted to Sydney Water
The approved plans must be submitted to a Sydney Water Quick Check agent to
determine whether the development will affect any Sydney Water wastewater and water
mains, stormwater drains and/or easement, and if any requirements need to be met.
Plans will be appropriately stamped.
Please refer to the web site www.sydneywater.com.au for:
Quick Check agents details – See building and Developing then Quick Check
and
Guidelines for Building Over/Adjacent to /Sydney Water Assets – see Building and
Developing then Building and Renovating.
or telephone 13 20 92.
15. Section 94A Contribution
Pursuant to section 80A (1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979,
and The Hills Section 94A Contributions Plan, a contribution of $11,815.10 shall be paid
to Council. This amount is to be adjusted at the time of the actual payment in
accordance with the provisions of the Hills Section 94A Contributions Plan.
The contribution is to be paid prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate or
Complying Development Certificate.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 49
You are advised that the maximum percentage of the levy for development under
section 94A of the Act having a proposed construction cost is within the range specified
in the table below;
Proposed cost of the development Maximum percentage of the levy
Up to $100,000 Nil
$100,001 - $200,000 0.5 %
More than $200,000 1%
PRIOR TO WORK COMMENCING ON THE SITE
16. Tree Protection Fencing
Prior to any works commencing on site Tree Protection Fencing must be in place around
trees or groups of trees nominated for retention. In order of precedence the location of
fencing shall be a) As per Tree Protection Plan as per Arborist report for project or b)
Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) as calculated under AS4970 (2009) Protection of trees on
development sites c) A minimum of 3m radius from trunk.
The erection of a minimum 1.8m chain-wire fence to delineate the TPZ is to stop the
following occurring:
Stockpiling of materials within TPZ;
Placement of fill within TPZ;
Parking of vehicles within the TPZ;
Compaction of soil within the TPZ;
Cement washout and other chemical or fuel contaminants within TPZ; and
Damage to tree crown.
17. Tree Protection Signage
Prior to any works commencing on site a Tree Protection Zone sign must be attached to
the Tree Protection Fencing stating “Tree Protection Zone No Access” (The lettering size
on the sign shall comply with AS1319). Access to this area can only be authorised by the
project arborist or site manager.
18. Mulching within Tree Protection Zone
Prior to any works commencing on site all areas within the Tree Protection Zone are to
be mulched with composted leaf mulch to a depth of 100mm.
19. Trenching within Tree Protection Zone
Any trenching for installation of drainage, sewerage, irrigation or any other services
within the Tree Protection Zone of trees identified for retention is to be under the
supervision of the project arborist.
Certification of supervision must be provided to the Certifying Authority within 14 days of
completion of trenching works.
20. Management of Building Sites – Builder’s Details
The erection of suitable fencing or other measures to restrict public access to the site
and building works, materials or equipment when the building work is not in progress or
the site is otherwise unoccupied.
The erection of a sign, in a prominent position, stating that unauthorised entry to the
site is not permitted and giving an after hours contact name and telephone number. In
the case of a privately certified development, the name and contact number of the
Principal Certifying Authority.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 50
21. Consultation with Service Authorities
Applicants are advised to consult with Telstra, NBN Co and Australia Post regarding the
installation of telephone conduits, broadband connections and letterboxes as required.
Unimpeded access must be available to the electricity supply authority, during and after
building, to the electricity meters and metering equipment.
The building plans must be submitted to the appropriate Sydney Water office to
determine whether the development will affect Sydney Water’s sewer and water mains,
stormwater drains and/or easements. If the development complies with Sydney Water’s
requirements, the building plans will be stamped indicating that no further requirements
are necessary.
22. Principal Certifying Authority
A sign is to be erected in accordance with Clause 98 A (2) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Regulations 2000.
23. Approved Temporary Closet
An approved temporary closet connected to the sewers of Sydney Water, or alternatively
an approved chemical closet is to be provided on the land, prior to building operations
being commenced.
24. Erosion and Sedimentation Controls
Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be in place prior to the commencement of site
works; and maintained throughout construction activities until the site is landscaped
and/or suitably revegetated. The controls shall be in accordance with the details
approved by Council and/or as directed by Council Officers. These requirements shall be
in accordance with Managing Urban Stormwater – Soils and Construction produced by
the NSW Department of Housing (Blue Book).
25. Stabilised Access Point
A stabilised all weather access point is to be provided prior to commencement of site
works, and maintained throughout construction activities until the site is stabilised. The
controls shall be in accordance with the requirements with the details approved by
Council and/or as directed by Council Officers. These requirements shall be in
accordance with Managing Urban Stormwater – Soils and Construction produced by the
NSW Department of Housing (Blue Book).
26. Builder and PCA Details Required
Notification in writing of the builder’s name, address, telephone and fax numbers to be
submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to work commencing.
Two days before work commences, Council shall be notified of the Principal Certifying
Authority in accordance with the Regulations.
DURING CONSTRUCTION
27. Project Arborist
The Project Arborist must be on site to supervise any works in the vicinity of or within
the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) of any trees required to be retained on the site or any
adjacent sites.
Supervision of the works shall be certified by the Project Arborist and a copy of such
certification shall be submitted to the Private Certifying Authority within 14 days of
completion of the works.
28. Hours of Work
Work on the project to be limited to the following hours: -
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 51
Monday to Saturday - 7.00am to 5.00pm;
No work to be carried out on Sunday or Public Holidays.
The builder/contractor shall be responsible to instruct and control sub-contractors
regarding the hours of work. Council will exercise its powers under the Protection of the
Environment Operations Act, in the event that the building operations cause noise to
emanate from the property on Sunday or Public Holidays or otherwise than between the
hours detailed above.
29. Filtration Motor
The swimming pool filter and pump shall be fully enclosed in a purpose built acoustic
enclosure to attenuate noise emitted by the swimming pool equipment. The acoustic
enclosure shall reduce the sound pressure level of the swimming pool filter and pump
equipment to a level not greater than 5dB (A) above the background noise level in
accordance with Protection of the Environmental Operations Act 1997.
30. Roof Water Drainage
Gutter and downpipes to be provided and connected to an approved drainage system
upon installation of the roof covering.
31. Survey Report
Survey Certificate to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority at footings and/or
formwork stage. The certificate shall indicate the location of the building in relation to all
boundaries, and shall confirm the floor level prior to any work proceeding on the
building.
32. Pool Discharge Water
Discharge and/or overflow pipe from the swimming pool and filtration unit to be
connected to the sewer where available.
All backwash water from the filtration unit is to be similarly disposed, or alternatively,
must be piped to an absorption trench.
The pool excavations not to conflict with the position of household drainage trenches or
lines, the position of which must be ascertained before pool excavation commences.
33. Pool not to be Filled Until Occupation
The pool is not to be filled with water until the dwelling is occupied.
34. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Under clause 97A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a
condition of this Development Consent that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate
No. 600859S_03 for the principle dwelling and BASIX Certificate No. 600871S_02 for the
secondary dwelling be complied with. Any subsequent version of this BASIX Certificate
will supersede all previous versions of the certificate.
A Section 96 Application may be required should the subsequent version of this BASIX
Certificate necessitate design changes to the development. However, a Section 96
Application will be required for a BASIX Certificate with a new number.
35. Compliance with Critical Stage Inspections and Other Inspections
Nominated by the Principal Certifying Authority
Section 109E(d) of the Act requires certain specific inspections (prescribed by Clause
162A of the Regulations) and known as “Critical Stage Inspections” to be carried out for
building work. Prior to permitting commencement of the work, your Principal Certifying
Authority is required to give notice of these inspections pursuant to Clause 103A of the
Regulations.
N.B. An Occupation Certificate cannot be issued and the building may not be able to be
used or occupied where any mandatory critical stage inspections or other inspections
required by the Principal Certifying Authority are not carried out.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 52
Where Council is nominated as Principal Certifying Authority, notification of all
inspections required is provided with the Construction Certificate approval.
NOTE: You are advised that inspections may only be carried out by the PCA
unless by prior agreement of the PCA and subject to that person being an
accredited certifier.
36. Temporary Fencing of Pools
On excavation and prior to installation of the pool shell or placement of the steel re-
enforcement, a fence is to be provided around the pool excavation, so as to isolate and
prevent access to it.
The fence provided is to be 1.8m high and to no less a standard than correctly joined
and secured, temporary fence panels or chainmesh. The fence is to remain in place until
the site (dwelling) has been approved for occupation.
37. Swimming Pool Safety Fencing
All pools and safety barriers are to comply with the Swimming Pools Act 1992, the
Swimming Pools Regulation 2008 and Australian Standard 1926.1-2012. A fact sheet
titled Swimming Pool Fencing Requirements is available from www.thehills.nsw.gov.au.
38. Resuscitation Warning Notice
In accordance with the Swimming Pools Regulation 2008, a Warning Notice is to be
displayed in a prominent position, in the immediate vicinity of the swimming pool. The
notice is to contain a diagrammatic flow chart of resuscitation techniques, the words:
(i) "YOUNG CHILDREN SHOULD BE SUPERVISED WHEN USING THIS SWIMMING POOL",
and
(ii) "POOL GATES MUST BE KEPT CLOSED AT ALL TIMES", and
(iii) "KEEP ARTICLES, OBJECTS AND STRUCTURES AT LEAST 900 MILLIMETRES CLEAR
OF THE POOL FENCE AT ALL TIMES",
and all other details required by the Regulation.
39. Landscaping Works
Landscaping works, associated plantings and the construction of any retaining walls are
to be undertaken generally in accordance with the approved plans.
40. Dust Control
The emission of dust must be controlled to minimise nuisance to the occupants of the
surrounding premises. In the absence of any alternative measures, the following
measures must be taken to control the emission of dust:
Dust screens must be erected around the perimeter of the site and be kept in good
repair for the duration of the construction work;
All dusty surfaces must be wet down and suppressed by means of a fine water
spray. Water used for dust suppression must not cause water pollution; and
All stockpiles of materials that are likely to generate dust must be kept damp of
covered.
PRIOR TO ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
41. Registration of Swimming Pool/Spa
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the swimming pool/spa is to be registered on
the NSW state register of swimming pools and spas. To register the swimming pool/spa
you are to log onto www.swimmingpoolregister.nsw.gov.au and follow the prompts. A
copy of the registration certificate is to be submitted to the PCA to confirm the
registration.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 53
42. Completion of Engineering Works
An Occupation Certificate must not be issued prior to the completion of all engineering
works covered by this consent, in accordance with this consent.
43. Retaining Walls
All retaining walls shown on the approved plans shall be completed prior to the issue of a
Final Occupation Certificate.
THE USE OF THE SITE
44. Maintenance of Landscaping Works
The landscaping works, associated plantings and construction of retaining walls are to be
effectively maintained at all times and throughout the life of the development.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Locality Plan
2. Aerial Photograph
3. Site Plan
4. Elevations
5. Shadow Diagrams
6. Zoning Map
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 54
ATTACHMENT 1 – LOCALITY PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 55
ATTACHMENT 2 – AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 56
ATTACHMENT 3 – SITE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 57
ATTACHMENT 4 – ELEVATIONS
Existing Ground Level
Existing Ground Level
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 58
ATTACHMENT 4 – ELEVATIONS
Existing Ground Level
Existing Ground Level
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 59
ATTACHMENT 5 – SHADOW DIAGRAMS
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 60
ATTACHMENT 5 – SHADOW DIAGRAMS
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 26 MAY, 2015
PAGE 61
ATTACHMENT 6 – ZONING MAP