Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of...

20
Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology

Transcript of Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of...

Page 1: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Development and

Implementation of a Peer

Review System

Paul A. CraigRochester Institute of Technology

Page 2: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

The Biochemistry and

Molecular Biology Digital

Library

Page 3: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Connection to BEN

Page 4: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.
Page 5: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

BEN and Peer Review

•Commitment to quality

•Each BEN partner is

responsible for its own peer

review process

Page 6: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Discussion of Peer Review

•Peer-Reviewed section

•Non-reviewed sectionXXXXXXX

Page 7: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

What Constitutes Peer Review

•Criteria for Review

•Review Process

•Review Schedule

•Reviewer Training

Page 8: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Building Our Review Process

•ASBMB Journals

•BEN and BEN Partners

•MERLOT

Page 9: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Journals of the ASBMB

• Journal of Biological Chemistry

•Biochemistry and Molecular

Biology Education

• Journal of Lipid Research

•Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Page 10: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Journal of Biological Chemistry

•10000 manuscripts each year

•500 editorial board members

•Online submission and review

process through ASBMB office

Page 11: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

• Six Annual Issues

• Co-Editors In Chief

• Three Features Editors

• Fifty Member Editorial Board

• Manual Submission Process

Page 12: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Unique Challenges

•Molecular Visualization &

Software

•Multiple programs

•Multiple operating systems

•Solution – screening expert

Page 13: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Common Criteria

•Scientific Accuracy

•Quality and Presentation

•Ease of Use and Clarity

•Active Learning

•Proper Citations

Page 14: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Molecular Visualization

•Software/Operating System

Requirements, Including

Links

•Limited Number of Formats

•Size Restrictions

Page 15: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Software

•Ease of Installation/Removal

•Documentation

•Operating System

Information

Page 16: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Curriculum

•Guidelines for

Implementation

•Full Materials Listing

•Reagent Preparation

•Safety

Page 17: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Review Pathway

Director

Software Mol Vis Curriculum Articles

3 Editors 5 Editors 3 Editors 2 Editors

Page 18: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Review Process

• Director receives the object and

assigns it by Category

• Category Editors assign the

object to two reviewers

• Reviewers return their comments

• Category Editor makes a decision

Page 19: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Review Process

•Accepted objects are posted

to the library

•An abstract is published in

Biochemistry and Molecular

Biology Education

Page 20: Development and Implementation of a Peer Review System Paul A. Craig Rochester Institute of Technology.

Review Process Details

•Reviewer training

•Role of ASBMB staff

•Electronic pipeline, including

tracking

•Notifications on all levels