Developing the offshore wind supply chain...Agenda -Developing the offshore wind supply chain 10.00...
118
Driving Innovation Competition briefing Developing the offshore wind supply chain Feasibility Studies Feasibility Studies Sarah Vodden Competitions Manager London, 13 th November 2012
Transcript of Developing the offshore wind supply chain...Agenda -Developing the offshore wind supply chain 10.00...
-
Driving Innovation
Competition briefing
Developing the offshore wind
supply chain
Feasib
ility
Stu
die
sFeasib
ility
Stu
die
s
Sara
h V
odden
Com
petitions M
anager
London, 1
3th
Novem
ber 2012
-
Health and safety
-
Ag
en
da
-D
ev
elo
pin
g t
he
off
sho
re w
ind
su
pp
ly c
ha
in
10
.00
We
lco
me
We
lco
me
& I
ntr
od
uct
ion
10
.05
Th
e T
ech
no
log
y S
tra
teg
y B
oa
rdIn
tro
du
ctio
n
10
.15
Co
mp
eti
tio
n S
cop
e &
Ba
ckg
rou
nd
•C
om
pe
titi
on
Str
an
ds
(Fe
asi
bil
ity
/ D
eve
lop
me
nt
&D
em
o /
KT
P)
•Q
&A
10
.45
Fea
sib
ilit
y C
om
pe
titi
on
Pro
cess
Ap
pli
cati
on
cri
teri
a a
nd
pro
cess
Tim
eli
ne
s
11
.00
Fea
sib
ilit
y F
ina
nce
s &
Wa
y F
orw
ard
•F
un
din
g R
ule
s, F
ina
nce
Fo
rms
an
d E
lig
ible
Co
sts
•Je
-S (
for
aca
de
mic
fu
nd
ed
su
bm
issi
on
s)
•T
he
Wa
y F
orw
ard
•Q
&A
11
.30
Bre
ak
11
.50
De
ve
lop
me
nt
& D
em
o A
pp
lica
tio
n
Pro
cess
•A
pp
lica
tio
n,
Cri
teri
a a
nd
Pro
cess
(D
EC
C)
•Q
&A
12
.30
KT
P A
pp
lica
tio
n P
roce
ss•
Ap
pli
cati
on
, C
rite
ria
an
d P
roce
ss
•Q
&A
Lun
ch
14
.00
:
16
:00
1:1
’s a
nd
Co
nso
rtiu
m B
uil
din
g•
Co
nso
rtiu
m B
uil
din
g
•1
:1 F
ea
sib
ilit
y S
tud
y I
de
as
dis
cuss
ion
wit
h i
nd
ust
ry
exp
ert
s
•1
:1 S
cop
e /
ap
pli
cati
on
pro
cess
to
DE
CC
str
an
d
•1
:1 K
TP
sco
pe
/ a
pp
lica
tio
n p
roce
ss w
ith
KT
P a
dv
iso
rs
-
By the end of the briefing
You s
hould
, w
ith c
onfidence a
nd k
now
ledge, be a
ble
to:
•U
nders
tand the s
cope a
nd o
bje
ctives o
f th
e c
om
petition
•U
nders
tand the c
om
petition p
rocess a
nd c
rite
ria
•U
nders
tand the a
pplic
ation requirem
ents
•Be c
lear on the tim
elin
es &
deadlin
es
All
pre
sen
tati
on
s w
ill b
e a
vail
ab
le a
t:
htt
ps:
//kt
n.i
nn
ova
teu
k.o
rg/w
eb
/co
mp
eti
tio
ns-
faq
s/d
ocu
me
nt-
lib
rary
-
Technology Strategy Board
-
Our vision...
for the UK to be a global leader in innovation and a
magnet for innovative businesses, where
technology is applied rapidly, effectively, and
sustainably, to create wealth and enhance quality
sustainably, to create wealth and enhance quality
of life.
Pa
rtn
ers
hip
is
key
-
The Technology Strategy Board is…
A n
ational body s
upportin
g b
usin
ess innovation...
for busin
ess b
enefit..
for econom
ic g
row
th..
for qualit
y o
f lif
e..
-
Who we are as an organisation…
•An a
rm’s
length
executive b
ody g
uid
ed b
y b
usin
ess-led
Govern
ing B
oard
•Sponsore
d b
y the D
epartm
ent fo
r Busin
ess, In
novation
and S
kills (BIS
)
•W
e w
ork
acro
ss g
overn
ment departm
ents
and o
ften in
•W
e w
ork
acro
ss g
overn
ment departm
ents
and o
ften in
partners
hip
with the researc
h c
ouncils
•Focused o
n business innovation
and the application
of te
chnolo
gy
•Sta
ff o
f aro
und 1
40 b
ased in S
win
don
-
Our strategy
Su
pp
ort
fo
r co
mp
an
ies
fro
m
Co
nce
pt
to
Co
mm
erc
iali
sati
on
-
In just 5 years…
•O
ver 2000 C
R&D
pro
jects
launched
–M
ost are
Busin
ess led
•4000 b
usin
ess p
artners
hip
s a
nd a
lmost all
the U
K’s
univ
ers
itie
s
•Togeth
er w
ith p
artners
and b
usin
ess, over £2bn investe
d
in U
K innovation
in U
K innovation
•D
evelo
ped n
ew
ways o
f re
achin
g o
ut to
SM
Es
–Launchpad, Feasib
ility
Stu
die
s, Sm
art S
chem
e
•C
ata
pults p
rogra
mm
e
-
For more information...
com
pe
titi
on
s@in
no
va
teu
k.o
rg
Co
mp
eti
tio
n H
elp
lin
e:
03
00
32
1 4
35
7
ww
w.i
nn
ov
ate
uk
.org
_co
nn
ect
Ne
two
rk:
htt
ps:
//k
tn.i
nn
ov
ate
uk
.org
-
Rob S
aunders
Lead T
echnolo
gis
t –
Offshore
Renewable
s
Competition Scope
Develo
pin
g the o
ffshore
win
d s
upply
chain
Rob.S
aunders
@ts
b.g
ov.u
k
-
Develo
pin
g the O
ffshore
Win
d a
nd O
ffshore
Renew
able
s S
upply
Chain
.
Briefing e
vent
13
thN
ovem
ber 2012
-
Offshore Wind is a big opportunity...
UK
Global
2020 (G
W)
18
86
2050 (G
W)
45
439
DEC
C R
enew
able
s R
oadm
ap: 2020
Deplo
ym
ent
Technolo
gy &
Innovation
Needs A
ssessm
ent M
ed
Scenario
Futu
re M
ark
ets
:
-G
lobal and s
ignific
ant
-£56bn / y
ear in
2050
-5%
of glo
bal m
ark
et deliv
ers
sam
e G
VA a
s 5
0%
of U
K m
ark
et
-
But costs must be driven down...
And focussed innovation will be a key enabler of this.....
Key ‘big ticket cost reduction areas, but also a long tail...
Driving 4x cost reductions vsbase case to 2050
-
This call: £11.2m of joined-up innovation funding
3rd
Round:
Com
ponent
Feasib
ility
Know
ledge
Up to £
7m
Com
ponent
Technolo
gie
s
Develo
pm
ent &
Dem
onstration
Up to £
7m
Feasib
ility
Stu
die
s
Up to £
3m
Know
ledge
Tra
nsfe
r
Partners
hip
s
Up to £
1.2
m
Deliv
ering c
ost re
duction a
nd a
stronger U
K s
upply
chain
-
Feasibility Studies
•U
p to £
3m
of fu
ndin
g to e
xplo
re a
new
innovative technolo
gy for offshore
win
d
•Pro
jects
of up to £
150k a
nd 1
year dura
tion
•Bringin
g n
ew
ideas to the o
ffshore
win
d s
ecto
r
•Acro
ss a
ny p
art o
f th
e s
yste
m
•Id
eas fro
m insid
e a
nd o
uts
ide the s
ecto
r eg.
–N
ew
technolo
gie
s fro
m those in o
ffshore
win
d
–Assem
bly
meth
ods / technolo
gie
s fro
m the
manufa
ctu
ring industry
–C
FD
fro
m a
uto
motive
–C
om
posites a
nd c
oatings fro
m m
ate
rials
–R
elia
bility
and a
sset m
anagem
ent from
defe
nce...
-
Component Technologies:
Development and Demonstration
•U
p to £
7m
of fu
ndin
g to d
evelo
p n
ew
com
ponent te
chnolo
gie
s a
cro
ss the s
yste
m.
•3
rdR
ound o
f calls
this
year from
DEC
C
•G
rants
of up to £
4m
•Acro
ss a
ny p
art o
f th
e s
yste
m
Knowledge TransferPartnerships
Knowledge TransferPartnerships
•U
p to £
1.2
mto
accele
rate
innovation fro
m
academ
ia to industry
•KTP
funds h
irin
g g
raduate
for a p
roje
ct and
pro
vid
es 0
.5 d
ay/w
k a
cadem
ic s
upport to it.
•eg
novel ele
ctronic
s, control, e
nvironm
enta
l
tools
develo
pm
ent
-
This funding dovetails with others in offshore wind...
•Offshore Wind Programme Board to o
vers
ee c
ost re
duction to
£100/M
Wh
by 2
020
–Technolo
gy, Fin
ance a
nd A
lliancin
g
•Offshore Wind Accelerator fo
cuses o
n c
ertain
key a
reas
(Foundations &
access p
rim
arily
)
–These c
alls
may p
rovid
e futu
re p
roje
cts
for O
WA.
•RCUK & Supergen
•RCUK & Supergen
–W
e h
ope to take ideas o
n fro
m researc
h into
develo
pm
ent in
feasib
ility
stu
die
s a
nd K
TPs
•ETI
–C
om
ponents
develo
ped h
ere
will feed futu
re E
TI syste
m level pro
jects
.
•Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult
–Build
ing innovation c
apability
supportin
g futu
re C
ata
pult a
ctivitie
s.
-
Feasib
ility
Stu
die
s
-
Designed to bring new ideas to offshore wind
•Aim
to ‘gath
er up’ la
tent id
eas w
ithin
the
secto
r, a
nd fro
m p
ara
llel secto
rs.
•Assis
t in
develo
pin
g ideas to a
poin
t
where
they c
an a
ttra
ct fu
rther
investm
ent.
•Pro
vid
e a
n e
ntry p
oin
t and g
uid
ance for
•Pro
vid
e a
n e
ntry p
oin
t and g
uid
ance for
new
pla
yers
in the s
upply
chain
•D
evelo
p c
om
petitive U
K c
om
panie
s that
can c
aptu
re s
hare
of offshore
win
d
mark
et in
the U
K a
nd g
lobally
•U
se c
ost of energ
y reduction a
s a
‘le
ver’
for supply
chain
entry.
-
We have experience and new technology in
parallel sectors that offshore wind needs...
•O
ffshore
win
d c
an reach its
pote
ntial fa
ste
r with h
elp
fro
m e
xpertis
e in:
–D
efe
nce
–O
il & G
as
–Auto
motive &
Manufa
ctu
ring
–Advanced M
ate
rials
–Aero
space
–M
arine Industrie
s
–Environm
enta
l m
anagem
ent
–Environm
enta
l m
anagem
ent
•Id
eas c
an c
ontrib
ute
anyw
here
in the o
ffshore
win
d s
yste
m:
–Pro
ject D
evelo
pm
ent
–Turb
ine &
structu
re
–Foundations
–Ele
ctric
al C
onnection &
Tra
nsm
issio
n
–In
sta
llation
–O
&M
-
For example: Opportunities for the Automotive Supply Chain
•D
rivetrain
Relia
bility
–Avoid
ing u
npla
nned m
ain
tenance is critical
when 1
00km
offshore
•Advanced A
ssem
bly
Technolo
gie
s
–In
fant m
anufa
ctu
ring industry n
eedin
g to
gro
w u
p q
uic
kly
•Supply
Chain
Qualit
y M
anagem
ent
–N
ew s
upply
chain
s n
eedin
g m
atu
re s
yste
ms
•C
om
puta
tional Flu
id D
ynam
ics
–U
nders
tandin
g a
irflows
-
Scope & Eligibility:
•Any n
ew
technolo
gy in the b
road
offshore
win
d s
yste
m (to
shore
line)
•M
ust show
pote
ntial to
reduce c
ost of
energ
y
–C
om
mon b
asis
cost of energ
y m
odel
pro
vid
ed u
pon regis
tration.
pro
vid
ed u
pon regis
tration.
•Technic
al fe
asib
ility
stu
dy a
t pre
-
industria
l sta
ge.
•Sin
gle
com
pany o
r colla
bora
tive
•Busin
ess-led
-
Key Dates
•Sin
gle
Sta
ge C
om
petition
Com
petition O
pens
5/1
1/1
2
Briefing E
vent
NO
W!
Regis
tration D
eadlin
e9/1
/13
Applic
ation D
eadlin
e16/1
/13
-
Questions & answers
Scope
-
Applicationprocess
Ale
x C
hahia
n
-
TSB strategic criteria
•Does the UK have the capability?
�Sig
nific
ant re
searc
h c
apability
/capacity to e
xplo
it o
pportunitie
s.
•Is the idea “ready”?
�C
lear opportunity to w
hic
h this
is a
tim
ely
response.
�Speed p
rogre
ss tow
ard
s m
ore
susta
inable
econom
ic g
row
th.
•Is there a large market opportunity?
•Is there a large market opportunity?
�W
hat is
the s
ize o
f th
e g
lobal m
ark
et opportunity?
�W
ill it cre
ate
added v
alu
e in the U
K, ta
kin
g into
account th
e
glo
bal m
ark
et pote
ntial?
•Can the Technology Strategy Board make a difference?
�C
an w
e a
dd v
alu
e?
�W
ill o
ur in
vestm
ent pro
mote
susta
inability
and q
ualit
y o
f lif
e?
-
The “ideal project”
•A clear commercial opportunity to o
pen u
p o
r explo
it a
sig
nific
ant gro
wth
mark
et.
•A technical challenge that re
quires the c
reation o
f an
industrially driven consortium a
nd innovative a
nd
risky researc
h a
nd d
evelo
pm
ent to
solv
e.
•A realistic project w
ith d
eliv
era
ble
s a
nd a
pplic
ations
•A realistic project w
ith d
eliv
era
ble
s a
nd a
pplic
ations
that are
innovative, com
merc
ially
explo
itable
and o
f
wid
er benefit.
•A demonstrable need for support.
-
Tech
no
log
y D
em
o
Syst
em
De
v.Syst
em
Qu
al.
Tech
no
log
y D
eve
lop
me
nt
Pro
d.
Pro
toty
pe
Co
mm
erc
iali
sati
on
Types of project
Fu
nd
am
en
tal
Re
sea
rch
Ind
ust
ria
l
Re
sea
rch
Ma
rke
t re
ad
ine
ss
Re
sea
rch
Co
un
cils
Co
mm
erc
ial I
nv
est
me
nt
Ve
ntu
re C
ap
ita
l
TS
B a
nd
its
co
-fu
nd
ers
fu
nd
ing
Blu
e s
ky
Fea
sib
ilit
y
Ex
pe
rim
en
tal
De
ve
lop
me
nt
-
Competition eligibility
Developing the offshore
wind supply chain
Type o
f C
om
petition
Sin
gle
Sta
ge
Pro
ject com
positio
nSin
gle
Com
pany o
r
Colla
bora
tive
Fundin
g a
vaila
ble
Up to £
3m
Pro
ject Siz
eU
p to £
150k (in
dic
ative)
Pro
ject Siz
eU
p to £
150k (in
dic
ative)
Tota
l G
rant siz
e----
Approx % Funding for
business
Up to 7
5%
Anticip
ate
d P
roje
ct le
ngth
Up to 1
2 m
onth
Applic
ation form
10 m
ark
ed q
uestions
-
Competition page
Guidance for
Applicants
-
1.
If y
ou inte
nd to m
ake a
n a
pplic
ation, you m
ust firs
t REGISTER
for
the c
om
petition. (Remember: Registration ends 1 week prior to the
competition close)
2.
You w
ill receiv
e a
n e
mail
with y
our username
and password
alo
ng
with a
lin
k to the s
ecure
uplo
ad a
rea. This
em
ail
will a
lso c
onta
in
with a
lin
k to the s
ecure
uplo
ad a
rea. This
em
ail
will a
lso c
onta
in
your applic
ation form
with unique
applic
ation n
um
ber.
3.
For m
ultip
le p
roje
cts
: ple
ase c
onta
ct th
e s
upport team
(support@
innovate
uk.o
rg) after your firs
t re
gis
tration for additio
nal
unique
applic
ation form
s.
-
Project summary
Su
mm
ary
of
Pro
po
sed
Pro
ject
(N
ot
Sco
red
)
Qu
est
ion
Gu
ida
nce
Ple
ase
pro
vid
e a
sh
ort
su
mm
ary
of
the
co
nte
nt
an
d o
bje
ctiv
es
of
the
pro
ject
in
clu
din
g w
ha
t is
in
no
vati
ve
ab
ou
t it
.
Th
is is
an
op
po
rtu
nit
y t
o p
rovid
e a
sh
ort
su
mm
ary
of
the
ke
y o
bje
ctiv
es
an
d f
ocu
s a
rea
s o
f th
e p
roje
ct.
It is
im
po
rta
nt
tha
t th
is s
um
ma
ry i
s p
rese
nte
d i
n
refe
ren
ce t
o t
he
ma
in o
utl
ine
of
the
pro
ject
, w
ith
suff
icie
nt
info
rma
tio
n t
o p
rovid
e a
cle
ar
un
de
rsta
nd
ing
of
the
ove
rall
vis
ion
of
the
pro
ject
u
nd
ers
tan
din
g o
f th
e o
vera
ll v
isio
n o
f th
e p
roje
ct
an
d it
s in
no
vati
ve n
atu
re.
Th
is s
um
ma
ry i
s n
ot
ma
rke
d,
bu
t p
rov
ide
s a
sum
ma
ry o
f y
ou
r p
rop
osa
l fo
r th
e b
en
efi
t o
f th
e
Ass
ess
ors
.
This
part o
f th
e a
pplic
ation is not marked
-
Public description of the project
Pu
bli
c D
esc
rip
tio
n o
f th
e P
roje
ct (
No
t S
core
d)
Qu
est
ion
Gu
ida
nce
If y
ou
r a
pp
lica
tio
n i
s su
cce
ssfu
l, t
he
Tech
no
log
y S
tra
teg
y B
oa
rd w
ill
pu
bli
sh
the
fo
llo
win
g b
rie
f d
esc
rip
tio
n o
f yo
ur
pro
po
sal.
Pro
vis
ion
of
this
de
scri
pti
on
is
ma
nd
ato
ry b
ut
wil
l no
t b
e a
sse
sse
d.
To c
om
ply
wit
h G
ove
rnm
en
t p
ract
ice
on
op
en
ne
ss a
nd
tra
nsp
are
ncy
of
pu
bli
c-fu
nd
ed
act
ivit
ies
for
pro
ject
s in
rece
ipt
of
gra
nt,
th
e T
ech
no
log
y S
tra
teg
y B
oa
rd h
as
to
pu
bli
sh i
nfo
rma
tio
n r
ela
tin
g t
o f
un
de
d p
roje
cts.
Ple
ase
pro
vid
e a
sh
ort
de
scri
pti
on
of
you
r p
rop
osa
l in
a w
ay
th
at
wil
l be
co
mp
reh
en
sib
le t
o t
he
ge
ne
ral
pu
bli
c.
Do
no
t
incl
ud
e a
ny
co
mm
erc
iall
y c
on
fid
en
tia
l in
form
ati
on
, fo
r in
clu
de
an
y c
om
me
rcia
lly
co
nfi
de
nti
al
info
rma
tio
n,
for
exa
mp
le I
nte
lle
ctu
al
Pro
pe
rty
or
pa
ten
t d
eta
ils,
in
th
is
sum
ma
ry.
Wh
ilst
th
is s
ect
ion
is
no
t a
sse
sse
d,
pro
vis
ion
of
this
pu
bli
c d
esc
rip
tio
n is
ma
nd
ato
ry.
Fu
nd
ing
wil
l n
ot
be
pro
vid
ed
to
su
cce
ssfu
l pro
ject
s w
ith
ou
t th
is.
This
part o
f th
e a
pplic
ation is mandatory
but is
not marked
-
Application structure
The A
pplic
ation is b
roken d
ow
n into
4 m
ark
ed s
ections:
Pa
ge
In
form
ati
on
Re
qu
ire
d
1
Ap
pli
cati
on
De
tail
s
2
Su
mm
ary
of
Pro
po
sed
Pro
ject
2
Ga
tew
ay
Qu
est
ion
: S
cop
e
3
Se
ctio
n 1
–T
he
Bu
sin
ess
Pro
po
siti
on
3
S
ect
ion
1 –
Th
e B
usi
ne
ss P
rop
osi
tio
n
4 &
5S
ect
ion
2 –
Pro
ject
De
tail
s &
Pa
rtn
er/
Co
lla
bo
rato
r D
eta
ils
5
Se
ctio
n 3
–F
un
din
g a
nd
Ad
de
d V
alu
e
6
Oth
er
Fu
nd
ing
Fro
m P
ub
lic
Se
cto
r B
od
ies
7
Fin
an
ce S
um
ma
ry T
ab
le
Ple
ase refe
r to
the C
om
petition G
uid
ance.
-
Gateway question: Scope
Key points:
•“m
ust alig
n”
•“c
lear m
ajo
rity
of th
e
How well does the project fit the competition?
•“c
lear m
ajo
rity
of th
e
pro
jects
obje
ctives
and a
ctivitie
s”
Don’t w
rite
yours
elf
out of scope...!
-
Section 1:
The business proposition
Question 1
What is
the b
usin
ess o
pportunity that th
is p
roje
ct
addre
sses?
Question 2
What is
the s
ize o
f th
e m
ark
et opportunity that th
is
pro
ject m
ight open u
p?
All
questions a
re e
qually
weig
hte
d (10 m
ark
s p
er question)
pro
ject m
ight open u
p?
Question 3
How
will the results o
f th
e p
roje
ct be e
xplo
ited a
nd
dis
sem
inate
d?
Question 4
What econom
ic, socia
l and e
nvironm
enta
l benefits
are
the p
roje
ct expecte
d to d
eliv
er to
those insid
e a
nd
outs
ide o
f th
e c
onsortiu
m a
nd o
ver w
hat tim
escale
?
-
•H
ave y
ou identified a
via
ble
busin
ess o
pportunity?
•Is
it cle
ar you u
nders
tand the d
ynam
ics o
f th
e m
ark
et?
Business proposition –key points
Question 1 What is the business opportunity that this project
addresses?
Question 2
What is the size of the market opportunity that this project
might open up?
•Is
it cle
ar you u
nders
tand the d
ynam
ics o
f th
e m
ark
et?
•H
as the “siz
e o
f th
e m
ark
et” b
een q
uantified a
nd w
here
possib
le,
has e
vid
ence b
een g
iven?
•Is
the b
usin
ess n
eed a
nd m
ark
et re
alis
tic a
nd a
ddre
ssable
by the
pro
ject? “If no-one in the consortium knows the market, you
haven’t got the right consortium!”
-
Business proposition –key points
•Is
it cle
ar how
your consortiu
m p
lans to e
xplo
it the results?
•Is
it cle
ar how
your consortiu
m w
ill b
enefit from
the p
roje
ct?
Question 3 How will the results of the project be exploited and
disseminated?
Question 4
What economic, social and environmental benefits are the
project expected to deliver to those inside and outside of
the consortium and over what timescale?
•Is
it cle
ar how
your consortiu
m w
ill b
enefit from
the p
roje
ct?
•H
ave y
ou q
uantified the v
alu
e o
f th
e o
utp
ut and h
ow
it w
ill b
e
dis
sem
inate
d?
•W
ho e
lse w
ill b
enefit from
the p
roje
ct and h
ow
?
•W
ill there
be a
ny s
ocia
l or environm
enta
l im
pacts
? If th
ese a
re
negative h
ow
will they b
e m
itig
ate
d?
•Susta
inability
im
plic
ations?
-
Section 2:
The Projectdetails
Question 5
What te
chnic
al appro
ach w
ill b
e a
dopte
d a
nd h
ow
will
the p
roje
ct be m
anaged?
Question 6
What is
innovative a
bout th
e p
roje
ct?
Question 7
What are
the ris
ks (te
chnic
al, c
om
merc
ial and
environm
enta
l) to p
roje
ct success? W
hat is
the
pro
ject’s ris
k m
anagem
ent strate
gy?
Question 8
Does the c
onsortiu
m h
ave the rig
ht skills a
nd
experience a
nd a
ccess to facilities to d
eliv
er th
e
inte
nded b
enefits
?
All
questions a
re e
qually
weig
hte
d (10 m
ark
s p
er question)
-
•H
ave y
ou d
escribed the m
ain
technic
al obje
ctives, m
eth
odolo
gy a
nd
the p
roje
ct pla
n?
•H
ave y
ou e
xpla
ined h
ow
the p
roje
ct w
ill result in s
ubsta
ntial and
Project details –key points
Question 5 What technical approach will be adopted and how will the
project be managed?
Question 6
What is innovative about the project?
•H
ave y
ou e
xpla
ined h
ow
the p
roje
ct w
ill result in s
ubsta
ntial and
lasting c
hanges?
•D
oes the p
roje
ct pre
sent both
com
merc
ial and s
cie
ntific
innovations?
•H
ave y
ou p
rovid
ed e
vid
ence s
uch a
s p
ate
nt searc
h o
f th
is
innovation?
The UK Intellectual Property Office says 80% of published patents are lapsed
and estimates that 30% of European R&D expenditure is wasted!
-
Project details –key points
•H
ave y
ou identified the ris
ks for your pro
ject; technic
al,
com
merc
ial, m
anagerial, e
nvironm
enta
l and o
thers
?
Question 7 What are the risks (technical, commercial and
environmental) to project success? What is the
project’s risk management strategy?
com
merc
ial, m
anagerial, e
nvironm
enta
l and o
thers
?
•H
ave y
ou o
utlin
ed h
ow
the ris
ks w
ill b
e m
anaged a
nd
mitig
ate
d?
Innovation is risky!–what is important is whether you have identified
the risks and how you plan to mitigate them!
-
Project Details –key points
•W
hy is y
our te
am
best pla
ced to d
o this
pro
ject?
•H
ave y
ou a
dequate
ly d
em
onstrate
d y
our te
am
’s p
roven
track record
?
Question 8
Does the projectteamhave the right skills and
experience and access to facilities to deliver the
intended benefits?
track record
?
•H
ave y
ou s
uccessfu
lly c
om
ple
ted o
ther in
novative R
&D
pro
jects
?
•D
o y
ou h
ave the a
bility
within
your te
am
to d
evelo
p a
nd
explo
it?
-
Section 3:
Funding and addedvalue
Question 9
What is
the fin
ancia
l com
mitm
ent re
quired for
the p
roje
ct?
the p
roje
ct?
Question 10
How
does the fin
ancia
l support fro
m the
Technolo
gy S
trate
gy B
oard
and its
fundin
g
partners
add v
alu
e?
All
questions a
re e
qually
weig
hte
d (10 m
ark
s p
er question)
-
•Do notsim
ply
write
out th
e fin
ance table
!
•H
ave y
ou e
xpla
ined the fundin
g m
odel & c
ost bre
ak d
ow
n for
the p
roje
ct?
•Is
the b
udget re
alis
tic a
nd a
ppro
priate
? –
undere
stim
ating
Funding –key points
Question 9 What is the financial commitment required for the
project?
•Is
the b
udget re
alis
tic a
nd a
ppro
priate
? –
undere
stim
ating
cost is
as b
ad a
s o
vere
stim
ating c
osts
•H
ave y
ou e
xpla
ined a
nd justified a
ny s
ignific
ant costs
e.g
. subcontracting o
r travel?
•H
ave y
ou a
rtic
ula
ted a
nd q
uantified the a
mount of in
vestm
ent
required to d
eliv
er th
e p
roje
ct?
-
•W
ill the T
SB investm
ent in
cre
ase the a
mount of R
esearc
h
and D
evelo
pm
ent undertaken in the U
K?
•H
ave y
ou e
xpla
ined a
nd justified w
hy y
ou a
re n
ot fu
lly fundin
g
the p
roje
ct yours
elv
es?
Question 10 How does the financial support from the Technology
Strategy Board and its funding partners add value?
Funding –key points
the p
roje
ct yours
elv
es?
•H
ave y
ou e
xpla
ined h
ow
the p
roje
ct w
ould
be u
ndertaken
diffe
rently w
ith T
SB investm
ent?
•W
hat are
the im
plic
ations o
f th
e T
SB fundin
g? W
hat does it
mean to the p
roje
ct, idea a
nd e
xplo
itation?
-
Finance summary table
Finance Summary Table (continued)
12
34
56
78
Org
an
isa
tio
n n
am
e
Org
an
isa
tio
n
reg
istr
ati
on
Nu
mb
er
En
terp
rise
Ca
teg
ory
Po
stco
de
Co
ntr
ibu
tio
n t
o p
roje
ct b
y
ea
ch o
rga
nis
ati
on
(£)
Fu
nd
ing
so
ug
ht
fro
m t
he
Te
chn
olo
gy
Pro
gra
mm
e
(£)
Oth
er
fun
din
g fr
om
pu
bli
c
sect
or
bo
die
s
(£)
To
tal
(£)
Lead org.
00
00
Partner 1
00
00
Partner 2
00
00
Partner 3
00
00
Partner 4
00
00
Partner 5
00
00
Partner 6
00
00
Partner 7
00
00
Partner 8
00
00
Partner 9
00
00
Partner 10
00
00
Pro
ject
co
st s
um
ma
ry
(fo
r e
ach
pro
ject
pa
rtic
ipa
nt)
1.
O
rga
nis
ati
on
na
me
Partner 10
00
00
Partner 11
00
00
Partner 12
00
00
Partner 13
00
00
Partner 14
00
00
Partner 15
00
00
Partner 16
00
00
Partner 17
00
00
Partner 18
00
00
Partner 19
00
00
Partner 20
00
00
Total (£)
00
00
1.
O
rga
nis
ati
on
na
me
2.
O
rga
nis
ati
on
re
gis
tra
tio
n n
um
be
r
3.
E
nte
rpri
se c
ate
go
ry
4.
P
ost
cod
e
5.
C
on
trib
uti
on
to
pro
ject
by e
ach
org
an
isa
tio
n
6.
Fu
nd
ing
so
ug
ht
fro
m t
he
Te
chn
olo
gy S
tra
teg
y
Bo
ard
7.
Oth
er
fun
din
g f
rom
pu
bli
c se
cto
r b
od
ies
8.
Tota
l
-
All
applic
ations a
re a
ssessed
by independent re
vie
wers
dra
wn fro
m industry a
nd
academ
ia
Application assessment
What do they look for?
•Clearand concise
answ
ers
•Clearand concise
answ
ers
•The right amount of information
•not to
o m
uch d
eta
il
•no a
ssum
ptions
•Quantification a
nd justification
•That the applicant has the right
people w
ith the right bright idea
and the means to exploit its
pote
ntial
-
Top tips
•Answ
er th
e q
uestion fully
and u
se a
ll th
e s
pace a
vaila
ble
•N
um
ber your sections &
questions
•C
heck y
our applic
ation for qualit
y o
f pre
senta
tion –
make
the b
est im
pre
ssio
n o
n the a
ssessors
•U
se c
apitals
when c
orrect to
do s
o b
ut not to
dra
w
attention to y
our case –
revie
wers
do n
ot lik
e it
attention to y
our case –
revie
wers
do n
ot lik
e it
•Q
uantified m
eans p
ut som
e n
um
bers
in
•Avoid
clic
hés –
“Holy
Gra
il” o
r “M
ark
et is
massiv
e”
•D
on’t leave y
our subm
issio
n u
ntil th
e d
eadlin
e
•Ple
ase refe
r to
the G
uid
ance for Applic
ants
-
Key dates –
Develo
pin
g the o
ffshore
win
d s
upply
chain
Time line
Dates
Com
petition O
pens
5th
Novem
ber2012
Briefing E
vent
13
thN
ovem
ber 2012
Registration Closes
Noon 9thJanuary 2013
Competition Closes
Noon 16thJanuary2013
Applic
ants
Info
rmed
19
thFebru
ary
2013
Offer Letters
Issued
22
ndM
arc
h 2
013
Feedback to A
pplic
ants
22
ndM
arc
h 2
013
-
com
pe
titi
on
s@in
no
va
teu
k.o
rg
Co
mp
eti
tio
n H
elp
lin
e:
03
00
32
1 4
35
7
ww
w.i
nn
ov
ate
uk
.org
_co
nn
ect
Ne
two
rk:
htt
ps:
//k
tn.i
nn
ov
ate
uk
.org
-
Funding
Sara
h V
odden
-
Funding
•N
ew
fundin
g rule
s
–Types o
f org
anis
ation
•Busin
ess
•R
esearc
h O
rganis
ations
•Public
Secto
r O
rganis
ations &
Charities
•Public
Secto
r O
rganis
ations &
Charities
–C
olla
bora
tive p
roje
cts
•D
efinitio
n o
f colla
bora
tion
•Levels
of partic
ipation
•M
inim
um
gra
nt
•Fundin
g c
rite
ria for th
is c
om
petition
-
Changes to funding rules
•All
com
petitions o
penin
g fro
m 1
stSepte
mber
•A s
implif
ied s
chem
e, but very
diffe
rent
•Pre
vio
us s
chem
e;
–fixed g
rant at pro
ject le
vel
–academ
ic g
rant w
as a
lways 8
0%
of FEC
–busin
ess p
artners
had to s
plit
rem
ain
ing g
rant betw
een them
–busin
ess p
artners
had to s
plit
rem
ain
ing g
rant betw
een them
•N
ew
schem
e m
eans b
usin
ess g
rant not re
duced a
s
result o
f colla
bora
ting w
ith researc
h b
ase
•Focus o
n b
usin
ess d
riven R
&D
so b
usin
ess e
lem
ent
must be the p
rim
ary
focus o
f th
e p
roje
ct (a
nd the s
hare
of costs
)
-
Changes to funding rules
Rate
s a
pplie
d to indiv
idual partic
ipant
–no longer applie
d a
t pro
ject le
vel (o
ld s
chem
e)
•R
&D
pro
ject m
ust still
sit in the c
ate
gory
specifie
d in the
com
petition s
cope (e.g
. pre
para
tory
to industria
l
researc
h –
75%
)
•R
ate
depends o
n o
rganis
ation type, siz
e a
nd the a
ctivity
•R
ate
depends o
n o
rganis
ation type, siz
e a
nd the a
ctivity
bein
g u
ndertaken
•N
ew
rule
s o
n level of partic
ipation o
f re
searc
h a
nd
busin
ess p
artners
(ie
share
s o
f th
e p
roje
ct costs
)
•Funding rules in Guidance for Applicants
http://www.innovateuk.org/competitions/guidance-for-
applicants/funding-rules.ashx
-
Types of organisation
•Busin
ess –
SM
E o
r la
rge (EU
definitio
n)
•R
esearc
h O
rganis
ation (R
O):
–U
niv
ers
itie
s (H
EIs
)
–Non profit distributing R
esearc
h &
Technolo
gy O
rganis
ation
(RTO
)
–Public
Secto
r R
esearc
h E
sta
blis
hm
ents
(PSR
E)
–Public
Secto
r R
esearc
h E
sta
blis
hm
ents
(PSR
E)
–R
esearc
h C
ouncil
Institu
tes (R
CI)
–C
ata
pults
•Public
secto
r org
anis
ations a
nd c
harities d
oin
g researc
h
activity
-
Business rates
Business Size
Pre-industrial research
Feasibility Studies
Micro/Small
75%
Medium
75%
Large
65%
-
Research organisations
•U
se E
U C
om
munity F
ram
ew
ork
definitio
n
•M
ust be ‘non-e
conom
ic’ activity
•U
niv
ers
itie
s –
80%
Full
Econom
ic C
ost (F
EC
) via
JeS
(mandato
ry for H
EIs
)
•O
ther R
esearc
h O
rganis
ations c
an c
laim
100%
of
•O
ther R
esearc
h O
rganis
ations c
an c
laim
100%
of
elig
ible
costs
but MUST:
–be non-profit distributing and
–disseminate the results of their project work and
–explain in the application form how this will be done
-
Public Sector Organisations & Charities
•M
ust be:
–perform
ing researc
h a
ctivity a
nd
–D
issem
inating p
roje
ct re
sults
•100%
of elig
ible
costs
•M
ust ensure
that th
e e
ligib
le c
osts
do n
ot in
clu
de
•M
ust ensure
that th
e e
ligib
le c
osts
do n
ot in
clu
de
work
or costs
already funded fro
m o
ther public
secto
r
bodie
s
-
Levels of participation
•The a
im o
f our Sta
te A
id s
chem
e is to:
–optim
ise the level of fu
ndin
g to b
usin
ess a
nd
–re
cognis
e the im
portance o
f re
searc
h b
ase to p
roje
ct
•At least 70% of total eligible project costs must be
incurred by business
•The maximum level (30% of project costs) is shared b
y
•The maximum level (30% of project costs) is shared b
y
all
researc
h o
rganis
ations in the p
roje
ct
•Ple
ase refe
r to
the c
om
petition g
uid
ance for applic
ants
on
our w
ebsite
-
What is collaboration?
In a
ll colla
bora
tive p
roje
cts
there
must be:
•at least two collaborators
•a business-led
consortiu
m, w
hic
h m
ay involv
e b
oth
busin
ess a
nd the researc
h b
ase and
•evid
ence o
feffective collaboration
(see g
uid
ance)
•evid
ence o
feffective collaboration
(see g
uid
ance)
–Typically this would mean that no one partner would
be taking more than 70% of the eligible costs, and we
would expect to see the structure and rationale of the
collaboration described in the application.
-
Minimumgrant changes
If p
artner w
ishes to c
olla
bora
te b
ut does n
ot w
ish to
cla
im a
gra
nt:
•ro
le a
nd w
ork
should
be in a
pplic
ation a
s for all
oth
er
partners
•partner nam
e a
nd tota
l costs
(contrib
ution to the p
roje
ct)
must be inclu
ded in the fin
ance s
um
mary
table
.m
ust be inclu
ded in the fin
ance s
um
mary
table
.
–Ente
r zero
gra
nt re
queste
d in fin
ance s
um
mary
table
•no p
artner finance form
required
•not be n
am
ed in the o
ffer le
tter if y
our pro
ject is
successfu
l
-
Changes to funding rules
•All
com
petitions o
penin
g fro
m 1
stSepte
mber
•A s
implif
ied s
chem
e, but very
diffe
rent
Pre
vio
us
sch
em
e
•F
ixe
d g
ran
t a
t p
roje
ct le
vel
•A
cad
em
ic g
ran
t w
as
alw
ays
80
%
of
FE
C s
o b
usi
ne
ss p
art
ne
rs h
ad
Ne
w s
che
me
•B
usi
ne
ss g
ran
t n
ot
red
uce
d a
s
resu
lt o
f co
lla
bo
rati
ng
wit
h
rese
arc
h b
ase
of
FE
C s
o b
usi
ne
ss p
art
ne
rs h
ad
to s
pli
t re
ma
inin
g g
ran
t b
etw
ee
n
the
mse
lve
s
•C
oll
ab
ora
tive
, n
o s
ing
le
ap
pli
can
ts
•N
o z
ero
gra
nt
pa
rtn
ers
all
ow
ed
rese
arc
h b
ase
•Fo
cus
on
bu
sin
ess
dri
ven
R&
D s
o
bu
sin
ess
ele
me
nt
mu
st b
e t
he
pri
ma
ry f
ocu
so
f th
e p
roje
ct (
an
d
the
sh
are
of
cost
s)
•S
ing
le a
pp
lica
nts
all
ow
ed
•Ze
ro g
ran
t p
art
ne
rs a
llo
we
d
-
Worked example –£100k total cost project:
Pro
ject costs
involv
ing 2
partners
(1 S
ME, 1 U
niv
ers
ity).
Total funding limits
Total eligible
project cost
Maximum % of
eligible costs
which may be
claimed as grant
TSB Grant
Project
contribution
Business (SME)
£70,000
75%
£52,500
£17,500
Research
organisation
£30,000*
100%
£30,000
nil**
Total
£100,000
-£82,500
£17,500
*80%
FEC
**20%
FEC
not to
be s
how
n a
s a
contrib
ution
-
Project costs
•Busin
ess &
non-a
cadem
ic p
artners
–Elig
ible
Pro
ject C
osts
–Partner Fin
ance F
orm
•Academ
ics
–Je-S
–Je-S
–Academ
ic F
inance F
orm
-
Eligible project costs
(applic
ants
/ n
on-a
cadem
ic p
artners
)
•Labour C
osts
•O
verh
eads
•M
ate
rials
•C
apital Equip
ment U
sage
•Sub-C
ontracts
•Tra
vel & S
ubsis
tence
•O
ther C
osts
–O
ther elig
ible
direct costs
not in
clu
ded in the a
bove h
eadin
gs
•C
ontrib
utions in k
ind
•IP
filing c
osts
up to £
5,0
00 (SM
E o
nly
)
-
Ineligible project costs
•In
put or O
utp
ut VAT
•In
tere
st charg
es, bad d
ebts
, pro
fits
, advertis
ing, ente
rtain
ment
•H
ire p
urc
hase inte
rest and a
ssocia
ted s
erv
ice c
harg
es
•Pro
fit earn
ed b
y a
subsid
iary
or by a
n a
ssocia
te u
ndertakin
g
work
sub-c
ontracte
d o
ut under th
e p
roje
ct
•In
flation a
nd c
ontingency a
llow
ances
•In
flation a
nd c
ontingency a
llow
ances
•The v
alu
e o
f exis
ting a
ssets
such a
s IPR
, data
, softw
are
and
oth
er explo
itable
assets
that are
contrib
ute
d to the p
roje
ct by
any c
olla
bora
tor
•In
dependent Accounta
nt’s R
eport F
ees
-
Eligible overheads
•Indirect labour costs
–Board & senior management –
the p
erc
enta
ge o
f th
eir tim
e w
here
they a
re involv
ed in y
our pro
jects
but are
not in
clu
ded a
s indiv
iduals
in
the d
irect la
bour costs
–Admin and support staff –
where
not in
clu
ded in d
irect la
bour costs
•Recruitment costs
•General supplies and IT –
not lin
ked to p
roduction o
r serv
ice
•General supplies and IT –
not lin
ked to p
roduction o
r serv
ice
deliv
ery
•Corporate fees and expenses –
IPR
main
tenance, in
sura
nce,
photo
copyin
g
•Site expenses –
build
ing renta
l, taxes, security
and c
leanin
g
•Utilities –
care
ful not to
inclu
de p
roduction e
quip
ment energ
y o
r
supply
costs
-
Ineligible overheads
•Production or service delivery costs –
any c
osts
associa
ted w
ith the w
ay in w
hic
h the c
om
pany m
akes its
money. This
would
inclu
de a
ll item
s u
sed to c
alc
ula
te g
ross
marg
in a
nd c
ost of sale
.
•Marketing and sales costs
–th
ese a
gain
count in
the c
ost of
sale
s
•Non-bookable R&D time
–non p
roductive tim
e o
r non-
charg
eable
tim
e o
f te
chnic
al or support p
ers
onnel
•Entertainment and hospitality
•New IP protection costs
•Any headings that are being charged for directly within
the project –
such a
s tra
inin
g, T&S
-
Partner finance forms
•Each a
pplic
ant or non-a
cadem
ic p
artner cla
imin
g a
gra
nt m
ust
com
ple
te a
Partner Fin
ance F
orm
.
•Fig
ure
s o
n the indiv
idual Partner Fin
ance F
orm
s m
ust to
tal
the s
am
eas those s
how
n o
n the F
inance S
um
mary
Table
on
the a
pplic
ation form
.
•The form
inclu
des a
tab for each c
ost cate
gory
whic
h n
eeds to
be c
om
ple
ted. The fig
ure
s in e
ach c
ost cate
gory
tab
popula
tes the s
um
mary
/tota
l field
s.
•Form
must show
the s
tatu
s a
s “com
ple
te” befo
re s
ubm
itting.
-
Grant claims & payments
•All
gra
nts
are
cla
imable
quarterly in arrears
•C
laim
s c
an o
nly
be m
ade for costs
incurred andpaid
betw
een the
pro
ject sta
rt a
nd e
nd d
ate
s
•C
laim
s m
ay b
e s
ubje
ct to
an independent audit
(inclu
din
g a
ll
academ
ic p
artners
) accord
ing to g
rant siz
e
•C
laim
s a
re o
nly
paid
once q
uarterly reportin
g a
nd n
ecessary
audits
are
com
ple
te
•Pro
jects
are
monitored a
ccord
ing to p
roje
ct siz
e –on a quarterly
basis for Larger Feasibilities
inclu
din
g a
vis
it fro
m the a
ppoin
ted
Monitoring O
ffic
er
•The m
onitoring w
ill b
e c
arrie
d o
ut again
st a d
eta
iled p
roje
ct pla
n a
nd
financia
l fo
recast
-
Academic partners & Je-S
-
Why Je-S?
•The R
esearc
h C
ouncils
Join
t Ele
ctronic
Subm
issio
n S
yste
m
(Je-S
) is
bein
g u
sed to c
olle
ct ALL a
cadem
ic fin
ance form
s
•Als
o to c
olle
ct pro
ject finance d
eta
ils fro
m n
on-H
EIs
(e.g
. R
TO
s) th
at are
cla
imin
g they a
re c
arryin
g o
ut academ
ic
qualit
y w
ork
and w
ant to
be funded o
n a
n F
EC
basis
•The J
e-S
syste
m a
uto
mate
s the c
olle
ction o
f Full
Econom
ic
Costs
(FEC
) based c
osts
fro
m a
cadem
ic p
artners
and tells
C
osts
(FEC
) based c
osts
fro
m a
cadem
ic p
artners
and tells
th
em
exactly w
hat num
bers
should
be u
sed in the a
pplic
ation
form
for th
eir c
osts
•U
sin
g J
e-S
enable
s R
esearc
h C
ouncils
to e
asily
co-fund
Technolo
gy P
rogra
mm
e p
roje
cts
-
Eligible costs (academic partners)
•Elig
ible
costs
are
based o
n
FEC
calc
ula
tion
•R
C C
ontrib
ution is the tota
l
elig
ible
cost of academ
ic
partners
.
•The 2
0%
diffe
rence
•The 2
0%
diffe
rence
betw
een this
and the F
EC
tota
l DOESNOT
repre
sent
a c
ontrib
ution to the p
roje
ct
and s
hould
not be inclu
ded
anyw
here
within
the
applic
ation.
-
Academic partner finance form
Je-S
Eq
uiv
ale
nt
Su
mm
ary
Fo
rm -
To
be
co
mp
lete
d b
y e
ach
aca
de
mic
ap
pli
can
t fr
om
th
e J
e-S
su
bm
issi
on
do
cum
en
t a
nd
su
bm
itte
d t
o t
he
Te
chn
olo
gy
Str
ate
gy
Bo
ard
by
th
e l
ea
d a
pp
lica
nt
Ple
ase
co
mp
lete
th
is f
orm
by
fil
lin
g i
n t
he
pin
k s
ha
de
d c
ell
s a
nd
re
turn
wit
h a
ll o
the
r p
ap
er
wo
rk a
s a
dv
ise
d i
n t
he
gu
ida
nce
no
tes.
Th
is f
orm
is
for
HE
I's
an
d n
ot
for
ind
ust
ry
pa
rtn
ers
–th
e “
Gra
nt
So
ug
ht”
To
tal s
ho
uld
be
tra
nsf
err
ed
to
co
lum
n 4
on
Pa
ge
8 o
f th
e A
pp
lica
tio
n F
orm
.
Fin
an
cia
l re
sou
rce
sS
um
ma
ry o
f st
aff
eff
ort
re
qu
est
ed
Su
mm
ary
Fu
nd
He
ad
ing
Fu
nd
He
ad
ing
Fu
ll E
con
om
ic
Co
st (
FE
C)
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Te
ch P
rog
Gra
nt
So
ug
ht
(% o
f F
EC
)G
ran
t S
ou
gh
t
Sta
ff R
ole
Mo
nth
s
Dir
ect
ly I
ncu
rre
d
Sta
ff8
0%
£0
Inv
est
iga
tor
Tra
ve
l & s
ub
sist
en
ce8
0%
£0
Re
sea
rch
er
Eq
uip
me
nt
80
%£
0T
ech
nic
ian
Oth
er
Co
sts
80
%£
0P
roje
ct S
tud
en
tsO
the
r C
ost
s8
0%
£0
Pro
ject
Stu
de
nts
Su
b-t
ota
l£
08
0%
£0
Vis
itin
g R
ese
arc
he
rs
Dir
ect
ly A
llo
cate
d
Inv
est
iga
tors
80
%£
0O
the
r
Est
ate
s C
ost
s8
0%
£0
To
tal
0
Oth
er
Dir
ect
ly A
llo
cate
d8
0%
£0
Su
b-t
ota
l£
08
0%
£0
Ind
ire
ct C
ost
sIn
dir
ect
Co
sts
80
%£
0R
ese
arc
h C
ou
nci
l Fa
cili
tie
s£
0
Ex
cep
tio
ns
Sta
ff1
00
%£
0
Tra
ve
l & S
ub
sist
en
ce1
00
%£
0
Eq
uip
me
nt
10
0%
£0
Oth
er
Co
sts
10
0%
£0
Su
b-t
ota
l£
01
00
%£
0
To
tal
£0
£0
-
Normal Je-S application elements
Not ju
st th
e fin
ancia
ls
–E.g
. Justification o
f re
sourc
es
–E.g
Path
ways to im
pact
•Full
deta
ils o
n the J
e-S
syste
m
•Q
ueries a
bout Je-S
via
the J
e-S
Help
desk
•Q
ueries a
bout Je-S
via
the J
e-S
Help
desk
–JeSH
elp
@rc
uk.a
c.u
k
–01793 4
4 4
164
-
Submitting your application
& the way forward
-
The application submission process
-
Competition page
Guidance for
Applicants
-
1.
If y
ou inte
nd to m
ake a
n a
pplic
ation, you m
ust firs
t REGISTER
for
the c
om
petition. (Remember: Registration ends 1 week prior to the
competition close)
2.
You w
ill receiv
e a
n e
mail
with y
our username
and password
alo
ng
with a
lin
k to the s
ecure
uplo
ad a
rea. This
em
ail
will a
lso c
onta
in
with a
lin
k to the s
ecure
uplo
ad a
rea. This
em
ail
will a
lso c
onta
in
your applic
ation form
with unique
applic
ation n
um
ber.
3.
For m
ultip
le p
roje
cts
: ple
ase c
onta
ct th
e s
upport team
(support@
innovate
uk.o
rg) after your firs
t re
gis
tration for additio
nal
unique
applic
ation form
s.
-
Public
are
a
Cli
ck L
og
in t
o a
cce
ss
the
Se
cure
are
a
-
•Naming
a)
Your docum
ents
should
conta
in y
our unique
applic
ation n
um
ber
(e.g
.: A
pp12345.d
ocx)
b)
Appendic
es b
egin
with A
PPEN
DIX
and s
upplie
d in PDF format.
•Format
a)
Applic
ation F
orm
subm
itte
d a
s a
Word
file
(.d
oc /.d
ocx)
a)
Applic
ation F
orm
subm
itte
d a
s a
Word
file
(.d
oc /.d
ocx)
b)
Fin
ance F
orm
s s
ubm
itte
d a
s Excelfile
(.x
ls/.xls
x)
c)
Appendic
es s
ubm
itte
d a
s PDF
file
Check: your application number matches your login username number.
-
Secure
are
a
En
ter
you
r lo
gin
de
tail
s
an
d a
cce
pt
the
T a
nd
Cs.
Cli
ck t
he
Lo
gin
bu
tto
n a
t th
e b
ott
om
.
Cli
ck U
plo
ad
an
d
foll
ow
th
e o
n-
scre
en
in
stru
ctio
ns.
-
Technology Strategy Board
Successful Applicant
1.
Conditio
nal offer le
tters
will b
e
issued appro
xim
ate
ly 3
-4
weeks a
fter notification
3.
Fin
ancia
l pro
ject cost re
vie
w
and v
iability
checks
2.
Retu
rn o
f various d
ocum
ents
within
the tim
escale
s s
tate
d
on the o
ffer le
tter to
valid
ate
the g
rant offer sent.
4.
Subm
it a
fin
ancia
l fo
recast
and v
iability
checks
undertaken
4.
Issue G
rant C
onfirm
ation
Letter
4.
Subm
it a
fin
ancia
l fo
recast
and d
eta
iled p
roje
ct pla
n
5.
Sig
n &
retu
rn G
rant
Confirm
ation L
etter.
The P
roje
ct m
ay n
ot sta
rt u
ntil th
e o
rganis
ation h
as receiv
ed a
nd
retu
rned s
igned a
ccepta
nce o
f th
e G
rant C
onfirm
ation L
etter
-
Issued for both
successfu
l and u
nsuccessfu
l applic
ants
within
4 w
eeks o
f re
ceiv
ing y
our notification
Wo
rd d
ocu
me
nt
Up
loa
de
d t
o y
ou
r U
plo
ad
ed
to
yo
ur
secu
re a
rea
No
t is
sue
d v
ia e
ma
il
-
Coffee b
reak
-
Driving Innovation
DECC-TSB Offshore Wind Component Technologies
Development and Demonstration Scheme –
Third Call for Proposals
Sally
Fento
n, D
EC
C Innovation
Sally
Fento
n, D
EC
C Innovation
Deliv
ery
(Offshore
Win
d &
Energ
y S
tora
ge)
Offshore
Win
d B
riefing E
vent, 1
3
Novem
ber 2012
-
Ou
r cr
ite
ria
fo
r fu
nd
ing
in
no
vati
on
•S
up
po
rt w
ill
be
pro
vid
ed
wh
ere
:
–th
e i
nn
ova
tio
n w
ill
sig
nif
ica
ntl
y c
on
trib
ute
to
th
e a
chie
vem
en
t o
f
DE
CC
’s e
ne
rgy
an
d c
lim
ate
po
licy
go
als
; a
nd
–th
ere
is
cle
ar
ev
ide
nce
th
at
the
in
no
vati
on
ne
ed
th
at
wo
uld
oth
erw
ise
be
un
me
t, i
.e.
wh
ere
th
ere
are
ma
rke
t fa
ilu
res
or
ba
rrie
rs t
ha
t
pre
ven
t/li
mit
pri
vate
se
cto
r in
vest
ors
; a
nd
–o
the
r a
cto
rs (
UK
or
inte
rna
tio
na
l) h
ave
no
t, o
r a
re u
nli
kely
to
, p
rov
ide
89
–o
the
r a
cto
rs (
UK
or
inte
rna
tio
na
l) h
ave
no
t, o
r a
re u
nli
kely
to
, p
rov
ide
suff
icie
nt
sup
po
rt;
–th
e p
ote
nti
al
be
ne
fits
ca
n b
e s
ho
wn
to
be
lik
ely
to
exc
ee
d t
he
co
sts;
–S
up
po
rt is
le
ga
l u
nd
er
UK
an
d E
U l
aw
•T
he
fo
cus
of
the
po
rtfo
lio
wil
l b
e p
rim
ari
ly o
n t
he
la
ter
inn
ova
tio
n s
tag
es
i.e
. la
te s
tag
e d
eve
lop
me
nt
an
d p
art
ial
an
d f
ull
sca
le d
em
on
stra
tio
n (
TR
Ls
5/6
to
8/9
). T
he
po
rtfo
lio
ma
y h
ow
eve
r in
exc
ep
tio
na
l ci
rcu
mst
an
ces
fun
d
inn
ova
tio
n a
t th
e e
arl
ier
sta
ge
s, w
he
re o
the
r a
cto
rs c
an
no
t o
r w
ill
no
t d
o
so.
It m
ay
als
o c
oll
ab
ora
te w
ith
oth
er
fun
de
rs w
ho
are
act
ive
at
ea
rlie
r
TR
Ls,
wh
ile
se
ek
ing
to
ma
inta
in i
ts o
wn
fo
cus
on
th
e l
ate
r T
RLs
.
DE
CC
-TS
B O
ffsh
ore
Win
d C
om
po
ne
nt
Tech
no
log
ies
Sch
em
e –
3rd
Ca
ll -
Bri
efi
ng
, 1
3 N
ove
mb
er
20
12
-
Ou
tlin
e D
EC
C I
nn
ova
tio
n P
rog
ram
me
–
ap
pro
x £
16
0m
Pu
bli
she
d P
rog
ram
me
•O
ffsh
ore
Win
d –
up
to
£3
0m
(u
p t
o £
15
m f
or
com
po
ne
nt
tech
no
log
ies;
up
to
£1
5m
fo
r O
ffsh
ore
Win
d A
cce
lera
tor)
•M
ari
ne
En
erg
y –
up
to
£2
0m
•C
arb
on
Ca
ptu
re a
nd
Sto
rag
e –
up
to
£2
0m
•F
ue
l C
ell
s (C
arb
on
tru
st a
cce
lera
tor)
90
•F
ue
l C
ell
s (C
arb
on
tru
st a
cce
lera
tor)
•B
uil
din
gs
Inn
ova
tio
n -
£1
5m
•E
ntr
ep
ren
eu
rs S
up
po
rt -
£3
5m
•E
ne
rgy
Sto
rag
e –
up
to
£2
0m
;
•B
iom
ass
Oth
er
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
•N
ucl
ea
r
DE
CC
-TS
B O
ffsh
ore
Win
d C
om
po
ne
nt
Tech
no
log
ies
Sch
em
e –
3rd
Ca
ll -
Bri
efi
ng
, 1
3 N
ove
mb
er
20
12
-
Ov
erv
iew
of
Co
mp
on
en
t Te
chn
olo
gie
s
Sch
em
e &
Ap
pli
cati
on
Pro
cess
91
Sa
lly
Fe
nto
n,
DE
CC
-
•A
im:
To r
ed
uce
th
e c
ost
of
off
sho
re w
ind
en
erg
y b
y a
cce
lera
tin
g t
he
co
mm
erc
iali
sati
on
of
com
po
ne
nt
tech
no
log
ies
for
off
sho
re w
ind
sys
tem
s to
be
de
plo
yed
in t
he
ru
n u
p t
o 2
02
0 a
nd
in
th
e s
ub
seq
ue
nt
de
cad
e.
•T
he
sch
em
e’s
ma
in o
bje
ctiv
es
are
to
:�
De
mo
nst
rate
co
mp
on
en
t te
chn
olo
gie
s fo
r >
5M
W o
ffsh
ore
win
d t
urb
ine
s;
�P
rov
ide
su
pp
ort
fo
r in
no
vati
ve c
om
po
ne
nts
th
at
go
be
yon
d c
urr
en
t u
nd
ers
tan
din
g &
exp
eri
en
ce i
n t
erm
s o
f sc
ale
an
d/o
r co
mp
lexi
ty;
Ove
rvie
w
un
de
rsta
nd
ing
& e
xpe
rie
nce
in
te
rms
of
sca
le a
nd
/or
com
ple
xity
;
�G
en
era
te le
arn
ing
an
d p
ract
ica
l e
xpe
rie
nce
to
im
pro
ve c
on
fid
en
ce i
n
inn
ova
tive
larg
e o
ffsh
ore
win
d s
yste
ms
& r
ed
uce
fu
ture
co
sts.
•U
p t
o £
7m
ca
pit
al
exp
en
dit
ure
is
ava
ila
ble
fo
r th
is c
all
an
d D
EC
C e
xpe
cts
to
sup
po
rt b
etw
ee
n 5
an
d 1
0 d
eve
lop
me
nt
an
d d
em
on
stra
tio
n p
roje
cts,
wit
h
up
to
£4
m g
ran
t a
vail
ab
le f
or
an
in
div
idu
al
pro
ject
.
•Jo
int
fun
din
g g
ran
t sc
he
me
–i.
e.
pri
vate
se
cto
r in
vest
me
nt
req
uir
ed
a
lon
gsi
de
th
e D
EC
C g
ran
t to
fu
nd
pro
ject
s.
92
DE
CC
-TS
B O
ffsh
ore
Win
d C
om
po
ne
nt
Tech
no
log
ies
Sch
em
e –
3rd
Ca
ll -
Bri
efi
ng
, 1
3 N
ove
mb
er
20
12
-
•B
roa
d T
ech
no
log
y S
cop
e:
this
3rd
Ca
ll c
an
po
ten
tia
lly
su
pp
ort
inn
ova
tio
n in
th
e c
om
po
ne
nt
tech
no
log
ies
for
an
y s
ub
-are
a o
f a
larg
e,
ie.
gre
ate
r th
an
5M
W,
off
sho
re w
ind
sys
tem
, in
clu
din
g t
he
foll
ow
ing
su
b-a
rea
s:
�Tu
rbin
es;
�Fo
un
da
tio
ns;
Tech
no
log
y S
cop
e
�Fo
un
da
tio
ns;
�C
on
ne
ctio
n &
Tra
nsm
issi
on
;
�In
sta
lla
tio
n;
�O
pe
rati
on
an
d M
ain
ten
an
ce.
•P
art
icu
larl
y k
ee
n t
o s
ee
pro
ject
s w
hic
h a
dd
ress
co
st r
ed
uct
ion
in
con
ne
ctio
n a
nd
tra
nsm
issi
on
; in
sta
lla
tio
n;
an
d o
pe
rati
on
an
d
ma
inte
na
nce
.
93
DE
CC
-TS
B O
ffsh
ore
Win
d C
om
po
ne
nt
Tech
no
log
ies
Sch
em
e –
3rd
Ca
ll -
Bri
efi
ng
, 1
3 N
ove
mb
er
20
12
-
•G
ran
ts w
ill
be
aw
ard
ed
un
de
r th
e t
erm
s o
f th
e E
U G
en
era
l B
lock
Exe
mp
tio
n R
eg
ula
tio
n1
(GB
ER
), w
ith
in t
he
Ex
pe
rim
en
tal
De
ve
lop
me
nt
cate
go
ry d
efi
ne
d in
th
e G
BE
R.
•T
his
lim
its
tota
l p
ub
lic
fun
din
g t
o:
Eli
gib
le C
ost
s
Siz
e o
f
En
terp
rise
Ma
xim
um
am
ou
nt
of
aid
tow
ard
s e
lig
ible
Pro
ject
Co
sts
94
1. http://e
c.e
uro
pa.e
u/c
om
petition/s
tate
_aid
/refo
rm/g
ber_
final_
en.p
df
DE
CC
-TS
B O
ffsh
ore
Win
d C
om
po
ne
nt
Tech
no
log
ies
Sch
em
e –
3rd
Ca
ll -
Bri
efi
ng
, 1
3 N
ove
mb
er
20
12
En
terp
rise
tow
ard
s e
lig
ible
Pro
ject
Co
sts
So
lee
nte
rpri
se:
Sm
all
45
%
Me
diu
m3
5%
Larg
e2
5%
Pu
bli
cfu
nd
ing
ma
y b
e i
ncr
ea
sed
by
a f
urt
he
r 1
5%
if
the
pro
