Developing sound climate-smart strategies based on zoom-ins
-
Upload
ccafs-cgiar-program-climate-change-agriculture-and-food-security -
Category
Technology
-
view
214 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Developing sound climate-smart strategies based on zoom-ins
Developing sound climate-smart strategies based on zoom-ins
Michael Dingkuhn, CIRAD-IRRI-CCAFS
“Developing Climate-Smart Crops for a 2030 World” Workshop ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 6-8 December 2011
Questions on zoom-ins
• Rice, sorghum, beans, banana/plantain• How many zoom-ins per species?• Selection criteria?• Funding per zoom-in? • Integration with local / international projects? • Breeder interactions?• Modeling support?
Typologies: 1. crop type
Rice Sorghum
Upland RainfedLowlandIrrigated
Trans planted
Direct seeded
Unfav’ble extensive
Favorable intensive
…
…
FF/FFFImproved grain
Traditional African
…
…
…
…
…
…
Typologies: 2. Region
IGP
Monsoonal SE Asia
EA mid-highlands
WASavannahs
WASavannahs
LASavannahs
Sahel … …
…
…
…
…
…
…
… ……
Typologies: 3. Institutional priorities & CC-specific analyses
• NARS home priorities• CG centres’ regional/global typologies & stats• New info on vulnerability to CC• New info on potential gains from CC
Þ Need to integrate info, also consider practical issues, construct a doable program
Key questions– How many zoom-ins? Which ones? Criteria?– How can breeders participate in CC adaptation research?– There is a lot of CC adaptation research going on in CG centers, including
modeling. How can we tap into it while maintaining NARS focus?
Key statements (may be right or wrong)– Land/food will be the «oil» of the 2030s. Forget about traditional systems.
Focus radically on intensification– Breeders only need to know the environments they will breed for. No
need for models, we know what we have to do– Breeders have been most successful when going for yield, not
physiological adaptations. But this will change with genomic selection, where we will need tailored ideotype concepts
– Focus more on opportunities coming from CC (e.g., CO2 fertilization; less chilling & more rain in some areas); For the constraints, trust in agronomy & risk management
Extra materials
‘Immortalized’ 2K O. sativa reference panel
Evolution of rice geneticdiversity platform
1st rice genome
sequenced
10500 lines wild & cultivated accessions sequenced
20 varieties genome-wide SNP
2000+ lines genome-wide SNP
Association genetics platform
2005 20112008
Indica
(gro
ups 1,2
,3) A
us
Aromatic
Tropical
(groups 1,2)
Tem
pera
te
Japonica
Admixed
Admixed
Indica(group 4)
Indica
Aromatic &Japonica
Aus
O. glaberrim
a
O. barth
ii
O. rufipogon(Papua New Guinea)
O. rufipogon
(E. & S. Asia)
O. nivarra
O. glumaepatula
O. meridionalis
O. rufipogon
(S. & SE. Asia)
O. sati
va
2012
Global Rice Phenotyping Network of GRiSP++
Yield potentialPhotosynthetic potentialPlant type, architectureHeat, chillingDroughtSalinityEarly vigorCrowdingl
CO2FACE
The molecular breeding revolution must aim at future CO2 levels
300
400
500
200
Pre-industrial
2050
ppm
Time to develop new variety
Green revolution
Genomic revolution
Molecular breeding
Doubling of CO2:Doubling of an external resource, as long as it is limiting:Þ Large increase of biomass, ORÞ Halving of collateral losses (transpiration)Limitations from PAR & N?
Our plants are
adapted to this level
Massive opportunity for breeding?
Objective:Not only measuringCO2 impact; => optimising CO2 usein crops!
25.0 m
1m buffer zone
Individual plots
28.8m2 check plot
Walkways
FACE office75m
75m
FACE facility design
A FACE facility on IRRI farm with 8 rings (4 ambient [green] and 4 elevated CO2 [orange]) each of size 25m diameter (300m2) on a 20 acre area
GRiSP:Plans for a phenotyping/breedingField platform with enhanced CO2