Developing GIS indicators and metrics

26
Developing GIS indicators Developing GIS indicators and metrics and metrics David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Colorado State University

description

Developing GIS indicators and metrics. David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Colorado State University. Goals of indicator development. Develop and evaluate landscape-level indicators suitable for spatial and temporal analyses of EMAP data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Page 1: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Developing GIS indicators and metricsDeveloping GIS indicators and metrics

David TheobaldNatural Resource Ecology Lab

Colorado State University

Page 2: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Goals of indicator developmentGoals of indicator development

Develop and evaluate landscape-level indicators suitable for spatial and temporal analyses of EMAP data

Investigate limitations of currently-available data and offer new, robust methodologies

Page 3: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Current effortCurrent effort

1. Linkage between watershed and hydrologic networks

2. Refine surrogates with direct measures of area and discharge

3. GIS-based toolsa. RWTools for ArcViewb. Catchment delineation & discharge in

ArcGIS

Page 4: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

1. Watershed–hydrological 1. Watershed–hydrological network linkagenetwork linkage“…in every respect, the valley rules

the stream.” – Hynes 1975Indirect measures based on

hydrological properties (e.g., Strahler order, drainage density, etc.)

Page 5: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies (Euclidean)

Page 6: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats

(downstream)

Page 7: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats As the fish swims

(down & up stream)

Page 8: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats As the fish swims

(down & up stream) Upstream length

- mainstem (2)- arbolate (1+2+3+4)

Page 9: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats As the fish swims Upstream length Network (dams,

fragmentation)

Page 10: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

What indicators measure What indicators measure watershed-stream linkage?watershed-stream linkage?Length of stream line– Dam alteration of flow at a downstream

gauge?

RWTools extension (ArcView v3.2)

Page 11: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Upstream66 km

Downstream298 km

MainstemUpstream37 km

Network16 km (down)6 km (up)

Page 12: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

2. Direct measures of discharge 2. Direct measures of discharge

Surrogates developed, e.g. Strahler order: The usefulness of stream order assumes, with a sufficiently large sample, that order is proportional to stream discharge – Strahler 1957

Alternatives:- basin area- discharge

Page 13: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Delineate reach catchmentsDelineate reach catchments

Robust method (no pre-processing)1 to 1 relationship NHD reach and

catchment“Grow” watershed from reach line

based on flow direction iteratively

Page 14: Developing GIS indicators and metrics
Page 15: Developing GIS indicators and metrics
Page 16: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Stream dischargeStream discharge

PrecipitationD = C * P

Page 17: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

10 acft

8 acft20 acft

Page 18: Developing GIS indicators and metrics
Page 19: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

R2=0.7282

P-value=3.407e-006

Page 20: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Stream dischargeStream discharge

Encouraging preliminary resultsAdditional factors (Infiltration, E.T.): – Geology– Land cover– Exposure

D = f(C, G, L, E)

Page 21: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

3. GIS-based tools3. GIS-based tools

Interactive query and analysis of watersheds (RWTools) (ArcView v3.2)

ArcGIS Geometric network

Page 22: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Plans for next yearPlans for next year

Initial release of GIS tools:– RWTools for ArcGIS– Functional-based spatial weights

Page 23: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Spatial weightsSpatial weights

11 2

3 54

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

1 0 1 0 0

0 1 0 1 0

W =

Page 24: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Functional weighting Functional weighting

1

1 2 3

54

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0.7 0 0 0

0.2 0.8 0 0.2 0.8 0 0

0.1 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.2 1.0 0

W =

6 7

E.g., downstream hydrology

Page 25: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Functional weighting Functional weighting

1

1 2 3

54

0 1 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 1 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 0

0 1 0 1 0 1 0

0 1 0 0 1 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0

W =

6 7

E.g., macroinvertebrates

Page 26: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Plans for next yearPlans for next year

Initial release of GIS tools:Perennial/intermittent frame

problem in western USDevelopment of network

fragmentation indices