Developing Evaluation Rubrics or Scoring Guides for UMass-Dartmouth January 27, 2012.
-
Upload
laura-andrews -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Developing Evaluation Rubrics or Scoring Guides for UMass-Dartmouth January 27, 2012.
What is a Rubric?A Scoring Tool
◦Lays out specific expectations (criteria) for an assignment or task
◦Describes different levels of performance on those criteria
Why Use a Scoring Guide?Increase reliability when gradingClarify expectations for studentsReduce time spent gradingProvide detailed feedback in a
timely mannerCommunicate with others about
criteria and standards
When to use a Rubric?For any high-stakes assessment
situation
When several different people are doing the assessment
When the criteria or expectations need to be clear!
Sharing OneFor a 200-level course in writing
arguments
For one of five assignments, assigned after mid-term
Steps in Creating a RubricFirst, Reflection
◦Why did you create this task or expectation? How does it relate to the readings or content of the course? What skills do students need to complete this project successfully? What scaffolding has the course provided thus far?
Next Step: ListingAfter completing the task
description, you will want to make a list of all of the qualities or characteristics you are looking for as students complete this task.
Third, Grouping and LabelingDecide on priorities, as your
rubric cannot cover everything. Also choose what you will call the levels of performance and what adjectives you think best describe the features.
Finally, Describing each Level of Performance
Repeating key words or phrases across all levels is appropriate
Example: Support for Claim
Writer offers an abundance of vivid examples, concrete details, and/or relevant passages of text to support the claim.
Writer offers adequate support (examples, details, passages) for the claim.
Writer offers little support for the claim or has depended on repetition as support.
Use of evidence shows original thought or unusual connections.
Use of evidence is solid but may be predictable or not particularly striking.
Use of evidence is entirely predictable, thin, or not relevant.
Let’s Get StartedFor the assignment you brought
with you, write the task description--concisely. Look at your assignment sheet, think about the readings or context, and repeat some of the language students will be given re: the product, performance, or task.
NextDecide what to call your three
levels of performance or achievement
Examples:◦ Exemplary, Proficient, Emerging◦ Excellent, Good, Developing◦ Strong, Satisfactory, Weak◦ Amazing, Effective, Needs Work◦ Above Average, Average, Below Average◦ Good, Fair, Poor
Identify 5-6 criteria or dimensionsExamples:
◦Clear Thesis, Adequate Support, Logical Organization, . . .
◦Eye Contact, Announces Topic, Elocution, . . .
◦Follows Procedure, Conducts Follow-up, . . .
◦Greets Clients by Name, Maintains Confidentiality of Files, . . .
Describe each LevelMake sure the adjectives indicate
qualitative differences
Use qualifiers
Other than adjectives or qualifiers, repetition is appropriate
HintsMost instructors find it easiest to
describe first the top level and then the bottom level, saving the middle for last.
If you describe FIVE levels of performance, you will work much harder, and students will see them as A, B, C, D, and F.
Good AdviceIdentify only features that can be
measured “objectively.”
◦Not, for example, ◦“seems to enjoy the task”◦or◦“has a poor attitude”
More Good AdviceDo not cram the “Dimensions”
column (far left) full of descriptors or information.◦Stick to 1-3 word phrases
Do not name a category “overall”!