Determining the source of saline groundwater from the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial aquifer in...
-
Upload
daisy-richard -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Determining the source of saline groundwater from the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial aquifer in...
Determining the source of saline groundwater from the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial aquifer
in southeast Arkansas
Justin Paul and Dr. Daniel LarsenDepartment of Earth Sciences; University of Memphis
South-Central GSA Meeting March 17, 2014
Study Area
and
Regional Geology
Modified from Wikipedia
Modified from Cox et al. (2013)
Alluvial Aquifer
• Quaternary sands and gravels (Ackerman, 1996)
• Capped by silt and clay confining unit (Ackerman, 1996)Modified from Ackerman
(1996)
Occurrence of saline
groundwater
• Chloride condition could be due to evaporative processes in near surface (Kresse and Clark, 2008).
• Cannot discount vertical migration of saline fluids along faults (Kresse and Clark, 2008).
Modified from Kresse and Clark (2008)
Soils• Mostly clay-rich
varieties derived from backswamp deposits (Saucier, 1994)
• On the whole, elevated Cl concentrations in backswamps (Kresse and Clark, 2008)
Modified from Kresse and Clark (2008)
Sand-blows
• Cox et al. (2004&2007)
• Tell us multiple things:▫ Paleoseismicity▫ Elevated pore
pressures
Modified from Cox et al. (2007)
Local Faults
• Arkansas & Saline River Fault Zones
• Area I has same orientation as regional structural grain
• Area II is distinctly linear
Area I
Area II
Liquefaction Fields
Brines at Depth
• Jurassic age formations
• Evaporative and shallow marine deposits associated with opening of Gulf of Mexico (Harry and Londono, 2004)
• Basinal brines with unusual chemistry (Hanor and McIntosh, 2007)
Modified from AR Geological Survey
Geothermal Anomaly at Depth
Modified from SMU Geothermal Laboratory Google Earth Application
Hypotheses
• Chloride condition due to…
1. Evapotranspiration processes whereby clay-rich soils restrict recharge and concentrate chloride in infiltrating
surface water.
2. Injection of chloride-rich fluids from depth into the aquifer through faults during previous earthquakes and
still migrating today.
3. Regional rivers recharging relatively chloride-rich water into the alluvial aquifer when river levels are
higher than the water-table.
Methods
Geochemical and statistical techniques to solve this hydrogeologic problem:
•Principle Component Analysis
•Spatial Statistical Analysis
•Hydrologic Tracer Analysis
Principle Component Analysis
• n= 177
• EV-1=91% of variance▫ Heavy negative weights on Ca, Mg,
Na, Cl, SO4
▫ Dilute end-member
• EV-2=4% of variance▫ Heavy positive weight on Cl▫ Heavy negative weights on Ca and
SO4
Alluvial Aquifer
Sparta Aquifer
-300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Kresse DataLarsen-Paul Data
Eigenvector-1
Eig
envecto
r-2
-1600 -1400 -1200 -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Kresse DataLarsen-Paul Data
Eigenvector-1
Eig
envecto
r-2
Desha; Rel. Dilute
Desha; Salty
Desha; Dilute
Chicot; Rel. Salty
Chicot; Salty
Chicot; Very Salty
• n= 57
• EV-1=84% of variance▫ Heavy negative weights on Na
and Cl
• EV-2=9% of variance▫ Heavy positive weight on Ca
and Cl▫ Heavy negative weight on Na
Both Desha; Dilute
Spatial Analysis
• Seeking statistical relationship between location and density of sand-blows to Cl content in groundwaterModified from Kresse and Clark (2008) and Cox et al.
(2007)
Hydrologic Tracer Analysis
• Modern water• <60 years
Tritium (3H)
• Geologically old water• Atmospheric, crustal, or mantle
source
4He, 3He/4He
• Intermediate age water• Assess carbon sources
14C, 13C/12C• Sensitive to evaporation• Water-rock interactions
2H/1H, 18O/16O
• Recharge temperatures• Recharge contributions and
sources
Noble Gases
• Water-rock interactionsTrace Elements
Interpretations
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
f(x) = 4.41045850121939 x − 10.7973951006412
f(x) = NaN x + NaNf(x) = NaN x + NaN
GMWL
Linear (GMWL)
ArkMWL
Linear (ArkMWL)
Alluvial Waters
Linear (Alluvial Waters)
Linear (Alluvial Waters)
VSMOW
Deep Waters
Miss. River Water
δ 18O
δ2H
Stable O vs Stable H
Cl content vs 14C age in alluvial groundwaters
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1000.0
1200.0
1400.0
1600.0
1800.0
Cl (mg/L)
14
C A
ge
Desha ; Dilute ;
Backswamp Desha ;
Salty ;Backswam
p
Chicot ; Very
Salty ;Backswam
p
Conclusions• Using geochemistry and statistics to solve a
hydrogeological problem
• Methods will test vastly different hypotheses1. Near-surface evaporative concentration of
chloride in recharging groundwater
2. Injection of chloride-rich waters from depth through faults
3. Regional rivers recharging relatively chloride-rich water into the alluvial aquifer
• Evidence suggests evap. evolved, pre-modern crustal waters mixing with fresher, younger meteoric waters
Special Thanks
• Tim Kresse- data
• Geological Society of America- funding
• U. of Memphis Dept. of Earth Sciences- support
• U. of Arkansas Stable Isotope Lab- support
• U. of Miss. Geology & Geo. Engineering Dept.-support
• South-Central GSA- travel considerations