Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

18
Determinations Determinations Mischele McManus Mischele McManus July 20, 2007 July 20, 2007 [email protected] [email protected]

description

OSEP Requirements, cont. States must follow the enforcement actions determined by OSEP, States must follow the enforcement actions determined by OSEP, Note: This applies to Part C also. Note: This applies to Part C also.

Transcript of Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Page 1: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

DeterminationsDeterminations

Mischele McManusMischele McManusJuly 20, 2007July 20, 2007

[email protected]@mi.gov

Page 2: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

OSEP RequirementsOSEP Requirements

IDEA 2004 Part B 616(a)(1)(C)(i) and IDEA 2004 Part B 616(a)(1)(C)(i) and 300.600(a):300.600(a):

States are required to make annual States are required to make annual determinations on local programs.determinations on local programs.

States must use the same categories States must use the same categories that OSEP uses.that OSEP uses.

Page 3: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

OSEP Requirements, cont.OSEP Requirements, cont.

States must follow the enforcement States must follow the enforcement actions determined by OSEP, actions determined by OSEP, 300.604.300.604.

Note: This applies to Part C also.Note: This applies to Part C also.

Page 4: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Compliance Indicator #1Compliance Indicator #1

The percent of children with The percent of children with Individualized Family Service Plans Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) who receive the early (IFSPs) who receive the early intervention services on their IFSPs intervention services on their IFSPs within 30 days of parent consent.within 30 days of parent consent.

Page 5: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Compliance Indicator #7Compliance Indicator #7

The percent of children who receive The percent of children who receive an evaluation, assessment, and an an evaluation, assessment, and an initial IFSP meeting within 45 days of initial IFSP meeting within 45 days of referral.referral.

Page 6: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Compliance Indicator #8Compliance Indicator #8

The percent of children exiting Part C The percent of children exiting Part C who received timely transition who received timely transition planning to support the transition to planning to support the transition to other services including: IFSPs with other services including: IFSPs with transition steps and services, and transition steps and services, and notification to the Local Education notification to the Local Education Agency and a transition conference if Agency and a transition conference if the child is potentially Part B eligible.the child is potentially Part B eligible.

Page 7: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Performance Indicator #2Performance Indicator #2

The percent of children served The percent of children served primarily in the home or a primarily in the home or a community-based setting.community-based setting.

Page 8: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Performance Indicators #5 and #6Performance Indicators #5 and #6

The percent of children in your The percent of children in your service area birth to one with IFSPs, service area birth to one with IFSPs, andand

The percent of children in your The percent of children in your service area birth to three with IFSPs.service area birth to three with IFSPs.

Page 9: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Determination ProcessDetermination Process

Based on:Based on: December 1, 2005 EETRK dataDecember 1, 2005 EETRK data Self assessment data from June 30, Self assessment data from June 30,

2006 application2006 application June 1, 2006 and December 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 and December 1, 2006

EETRK dataEETRK data Existing, approved focused Existing, approved focused

monitoring improvement plansmonitoring improvement plans

Page 10: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Sample ChartSample Chart

COMPLIANCE PERFORMANCE        

IND1 IND7 IND8 IND2 IND5 IND6 Sub. Compl.

Imp. Plan

Trend Data TOTAL

10.0 84.9 74.3 100 39.2 77.2 2   0 2

100 66.7 86.7 58.1 55.2 66.8 2 1 3 6

Page 11: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Data IssuesData Issues Self assessment – informal, no Self assessment – informal, no

representative samplerepresentative sample New indicators – new requirementsNew indicators – new requirements New indicators – need data system New indicators – need data system

upgradesupgrades New needs for documentationNew needs for documentation

Page 12: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Determination LevelsDetermination Levels Meets RequirementsMeets Requirements Needs AssistanceNeeds Assistance Needs InterventionNeeds Intervention Needs Substantial InterventionNeeds Substantial Intervention

Page 13: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Meets RequirementsMeets Requirements 15 service areas 15 service areas Meet substantial compliance on all Meet substantial compliance on all

six (6) indicators, or meet substantial six (6) indicators, or meet substantial compliance on some indicators and compliance on some indicators and show improving data on others show improving data on others

No follow-up currently neededNo follow-up currently needed Data will have to continue to improve Data will have to continue to improve

towards compliancetowards compliance

Page 14: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Needs AssistanceNeeds Assistance 35 service areas35 service areas Meet substantial compliance on Meet substantial compliance on

some indicators, may show some indicators, may show improving data on other indicatorsimproving data on other indicators

Must contact EOTTA for guidance, Must contact EOTTA for guidance, andand

Complete an improvement planComplete an improvement plan Quarterly reporting Quarterly reporting

Page 15: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Needs InterventionNeeds Intervention Seven (7) service areasSeven (7) service areas Do not meet substantial compliance on Do not meet substantial compliance on

most indicatorsmost indicators Will receive either Focused Monitoring Will receive either Focused Monitoring

(FM) or a Compliance Visit (if they have (FM) or a Compliance Visit (if they have had FM)had FM)

Will then complete an improvement planWill then complete an improvement plan Quarterly reporting Quarterly reporting

Page 16: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Needs Substantial InterventionNeeds Substantial Intervention State Interagency Coordinating Council: State Interagency Coordinating Council:

Process is too new to put anyone in this Process is too new to put anyone in this category this yearcategory this year

Do not meet substantial compliance on Do not meet substantial compliance on most indicatorsmost indicators

Failure to substantially comply Failure to substantially comply significantly affects the core significantly affects the core requirements of Part Crequirements of Part C

State may recover or withhold fundsState may recover or withhold funds

Page 17: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Improvement Plan and Improvement Plan and Quarterly ReportsQuarterly Reports

Electronic formats and submissionElectronic formats and submission Reports due: December 1, March 1, Reports due: December 1, March 1,

June 1, and September 1June 1, and September 1 Duration of reporting period: TBDDuration of reporting period: TBD

Page 18: Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Determinations & CIMSDeterminations & CIMS Needs Intervention = Focused Needs Intervention = Focused

MonitoringMonitoring Determinations, Focused Monitoring, Determinations, Focused Monitoring,

and Service Provider Self Review all and Service Provider Self Review all require Improvement Planning and require Improvement Planning and Quarterly ReportsQuarterly Reports

All are also based on the same State All are also based on the same State Performance Plan indicatorsPerformance Plan indicators