Determination of concentration of ethanoic acid in vinegar by titration
-
Upload
lawrence-kok -
Category
Education
-
view
50.537 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Determination of concentration of ethanoic acid in vinegar by titration
2206 – 008
Chemistry HL PA
1
Candidate Name : Cham, Eileen Yee Lin
Candidate Number : 2206 – 008
Date of Practical : 2nd
March 2009
Practical Assessment 11 – Determination of the concentration of ethanoic acid
in vinegar
Aim
To determine the concentration of ethanoic acid, CH3COOH in vinegar (commercial vinegar, “BILAL”
brand).
Introduction
Vinegar contains a small percentage of ethanoic acid, CH3COOH. This experiment intends to find out the
concentration of the vinegar against a standard solution of sodium hydroxide solution of concentration
0.0934 mol dm-3
through acid-base titration. The equation of the reaction between ethanoic acid and
sodium hydroxide is as follows:
CH3COOH + NaOH → CH3COONa + H2O
The end point of the titration process can be determined and the amount of reactants used can be
measured. Using the values obtained from the titration, and also the chemical equation as a reference, the
concentration of ethanoic acid in the vinegar can be determined through stochiometric calculations.
Phenolphthalein indicator solution will be used in this acid-base titration.
Apparatus and materials
Commercial vinegar, “BILAL” brand
0.0934 mol dm-3
sodium hydroxide, NaOH solution
Phenolphthalein indicator solution
(50.00 ± 0.05) cm3 burette
(250.00 ± 0.12) cm3 volumetric flask with stopper
(25.00 ± 0.03) cm3 pipette
(250.00 ± 0.12) cm3 volumetric flask
250 cm3 conical flask
Retort stand with clamp
Pipette filler
2206 – 008
Chemistry HL PA
2
White tile
Wash bottle
Filter funnel
Distilled water
Procedure
1. 25 cm3 of vinegar was placed into a (250.00 ± 0.12) cm
3 volumetric flask by using a pipette and
pipette filler. Distilled water was added into volumetric flask up to the calibration mark to dilute
the vinegar.
2. The volumetric flask was stoppered and inverted several times to ensure a homogenous solution
is formed. The flask was labeled.
3. The pipette, burette, and conical flask were rinsed with distilled water.
4. The burette was then rinsed with the diluted vinegar solution, and the pipette with sodium
hydroxide solution.
5. 25 cm3 of sodium hydroxide solution was placed into the conical flask using the pipette and the
pipette filler. 1 drop of phenolphthalein indicator solution was added into the conical flask.
6. The burette was filled with diluted vinegar solution with the help of filter funnel. The initial
reading of the burette was recorded. The conical flask with its solution was placed under the
burette, and on the white tile.
7. Titration was carried out by allowing the diluted vinegar solution to flow into the conical flask
until the pink phenolphthalein indicator solution becomes colourless. The final reading of the
burette was recorded. The conical flask was swirled throughout the titration.
8. Experiment was repeated until 3 volumes of titre with difference of less than 0.1 cm3 were
obtained.
2206 – 008
Chemistry HL PA
3
Data collection – quantitative data
Volume, V
/ cm3
Rough
titration
Accurate Titration
1 2 3 4 5
Initial burette
reading, Vi
/ cm3
(± 0.05 cm3)
0.00 22.20 0.00 22.90 0.00 20.90
Final burette
reading, Vf
/ cm3
(± 0.05 cm3)
22.20 43.60 22.90 43.90 20.90 41.80
Total titre,
Vacid
/ cm3
(± 0.1 cm3)
22.2 21.4 22.9 21.0 20.9 20.9
Table 1: Collected data from titrations
Data collection – qualitative data
The originally pink solution of sodium hydroxide and phenolphthalein indicator becomes colourless when
it reaches its end point during the titration.
Data processing / analysis
Only the volumes from accurate titration 3, 4 and 5 are taken to calculate the average titre.
Average titre, Vacid = 21.0 + 20.9 +20.9
3 ± 0.1
= (20.9 ± 0.1) cm3
From the equation of the chemical reaction between diluted vinegar solution (ethanoic acid, CH3COOH
solution) and sodium hydroxide, NaOH solution,
CH3COOH + NaOH → CH3COONa + H2O
We can deduce that 1 mol of ethanoic acid is needed to neutralise 1 mol of sodium hydroxide. In other
words, the amount of moles ethanoic acid used in the reaction is equal to the amount of moles of sodium
hydroxide used.
Therefore, to find the concentration of the diluted ethanoic acid solution, Macid,
2206 – 008
Chemistry HL PA
4
Amount of moles of CH3COOH = amount of moles of NaOH
Macid × Vacid = Mbase × Vbase
Macid × 20.9 = 0.0934 × 25.00
Macid = 0.0934 × 25.00
20.9
Macid = 0.11172 mol dm-3
Where Mbase is the concentration of sodium hydroxide solution in mol dm-3
, and Vbase is the volume of
sodium hydroxide solution in cm3.
To find concentration of vinegar prior to dilution, Mvinegar,
Amount of moles CH3COOH before dilution = Amount of moles of CH3COOH after dilution
Mvinegar × V1 = Macid × V2
Mvinegar × 25.00 = 0.11172 × 250.00
Mvinegar = 0.11172 × 250.00
25.00
Mvinegar = 1.1172 mol dm-3
Where V1 is the volume of undiluted vinegar pipetted in cm3, and V2 is the volume of diluted vinegar
formed in the volumetric flask in cm3.
To find the mass of ethanoic acid in 1 dm3 of vinegar,
Mass of CH3COOH in 1 dm3 of vinegar = Mvinegar × molar mass of CH3COOH
= 1.1172 × 60.06
= 67.1 g
To find mass of ethanoic acid in 100 cm3 of vinegar,
Mass of CH3COOH in 100 cm3 of vinegar = Mass of CH3COOH in 1 dm
3 of vinegar ÷ 10
= 67.0990 ÷ 10
= 6.71 g
Therefore, the concentration of ethanoic acid in “BILAL” brand vinegar, in percentage, is 6.7099 %.
2206 – 008
Chemistry HL PA
5
Uncertainties
Percentage uncertainty in Vacid = 0.1
20.9× 100
= 0.48 %
Percentage uncertainty in Vbase = 0.03
25.00 × 100
= 0.12 %
Percentage uncertainty in V1 = 0.03
25.00 × 100
= 0.12 %
Percentage uncertainty in V2 = 0.12
250.00 × 100
= 0.048 %
Therefore,
Total percentage uncertainty = 0.48 % + 0.12 % + 0.12 % + 0.048 %
= 0.768 %
Absolute uncertainty in Mvinegar in mol dm-3
= 1.1172 × 0.768 %
= 0.009 mol dm-3
Absolute uncertainty in Mvinegar in g = 6.7099 × 0.768 %
= 0.05 g
Conclusion
The concentration of ethanoic acid, CH3COOH in “BILAL” brand vinegar, Macid is (1.117 ± 0.009) mol
dm-3
, or (6.71 ± 0.05) %. This means that for every 1 dm3 of vinegar, there is (1.117 ± 0.009) mol of
CH3COOH, or for every 100 cm3 of vinegar, there is (6.71 ± 0.05) g of CH3COOH.
The result is obtained through stoichiometric calculations between the neutralization of ethanoic acid
(which is found in vinegar) and a standard sodium hydroxide solution. Diluted vinegar solution is titrated
against sodium hydroxide solution, and the volume of diluted vinegar needed in the reaction is obtained;
then, using the obtained volume, and the chemical equation of the reaction between ethanoic acid and
sodium hydroxide as a reference, the concentration of the diluted vinegar solution can be then calculated.
The concentration of undiluted can too be derived from that.
2206 – 008
Chemistry HL PA
6
Error analysis
The literature value as provided by the teacher is 6.5 %. The result obtained from the experiment is (6.71
± 0.05) %.
Percentage error = |6.5 – 6.71
6.5| × 100
= 3.23 %
The percentage error falls outside the range of the percentage uncertainty associated with the apparatus
used in the experiment, which is 0.768 %. Therefore, the result of this experiment is not in agreement
with the literature value, and is hence not justified.
Evaluation
Some sodium hydroxide solution may have been left in the pipette when transferring into the conical
flask. This causes systematic error in the amount of moles of sodium hydroxide present in the conical
flask. The amount of moles of sodium hydroxide in the conical flask is consistently lesser than what is
expected; therefore, the amount of moles of ethanoic acid needed to neutralize the sodium hydroxide is
significantly lesser too. This affects the calculation of the final concentration of ethanoic acid solution in
the end – the value obtained should be lower than the literature value. However, we obtain a value higher
than the literature value. This suggests that there are other sources of error that contribute to the deviation
of the result from the literature value.
If the conical flask is not swirled vigorously enough throughout the titration, the solution in the flask will
cease to be homogenous and hence present a non-uniform shade – colourless in the centre of the solution,
but pink in the other parts. This shows that only the centre part of the solution is neutralized by the diluted
vinegar. It is important to swirl the flask to ensure that all parts of the solution react with the diluted
vinegar to present a uniform shade, as a non-uniform shade makes it difficult for us to detect the end point
of the titration. If the conical flask is not swirled vigorously enough, the end colour presents itself later
than it should, which results in the addition of excessive diluted vinegar. This explains the great deviation
from the average in the volumes of titre in accurate titrations 1 and 2. Also, these excessive volumes of
vinegar added explains the final concentration of vinegar obtained at the end of the stoichiometric
calculations, which is higher than the literature value.
Phenolphthalein indicator solution is colourless in both neutral and acidic solutions; therefore, we cannot
rely on the colour of the phenolphthalein indicator solution to gauge if the end point is reached. Even
though all titrations result in a clear phenolphthalein solution, which is the desired end colour, the
volumes of titre from the rough titration, accurate titration 1 and 2 are not taken into account in the
calculation. This is because although the end colours in those titrations are ideal, the acid in the solution
may be excessive. Only the volumes of titre from accurate titrations 3, 4 and 5 are used in the calculation
as they are consistent with each other (with less than 0.1 cm3 difference).
2206 – 008
Chemistry HL PA
7
Ways to improve experiment
Distilled water can be squirted down the inside of the pipette to flush down all the sodium hydroxide left
inside into the conical flask. The addition of distilled water will not affect the amount of moles of sodium
hydroxide in the conical flask, but will ensure that all sodium hydroxide is transferred into the flask.
The conical flask should be swirled vigorously throughout the experiment, and the colour change of the
phenolphthalein indicator solution should be checked closely.
The flow of diluted vinegar solution from the burette should be reduced to slow drops when the end point
is nearing. The flow should be stopped right after the drop that causes the pink phenolphthalein indicator
solution to become colourless. This is to ensure that no excessive diluted vinegar solution is added into
the conical flask.