Deterioration Model for Optimal Mix of TbM v CbM
-
Upload
rdh -
Category
Engineering
-
view
179 -
download
1
Transcript of Deterioration Model for Optimal Mix of TbM v CbM
National Institute of Building Sciences Provider #G168
BEST4 Conference Nibsbest4 • April 13-15, 2015
Credit(s) earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request. This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. ___________________________________________ Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.
A Deteriora*on Model for Establishing an Op*mal Mix of Time-‐Based Maintenance (TbM) and Condi*on-‐Based Maintenance (CbM) for the Enclosure System David Albrice, BSc., URP., ARP., PRA
RDH Building Engineering Ltd. MaKhew Branch, P.Eng. RDH Building Engineering Ltd. David C. Young, P.E. RDH Building Sciences Inc.
Par*cipants will: 1. Learn the two types of asset deteriora*on
models 2. Explore the correla*ons when the two
deteriora*on models are overlaid 3. Iden*fy six different phases in the maintenance
of an asset 4. Iden*fy further model development needs
Learning Objec*ves
Overview • Background • Why do we need a model? • Types of models • The mul*variate model • The 6 phases
Background
• Prepared maintenance manuals since 1997 • Several different versions tested with clients over
a 15 year period • Started with data in Excel then moved to Access
and finally SQL (web-‐based) • The enclosure system does not lend itself to *me-‐
based maintenance (TbM) in the same way as electrical and mechanical assets
• The enclosure system requires a unique balance of TbM and CbM
Why do we need a model?
• To an*cipate the service lives and changing behaviors of enclosure assets, such as roofs and windows
• To understand the varying needs of these assets as they gradually age and deteriorate
• To align different maintenance strategies at certain milestones along the life of assets
• To provide building owners and managers with maintenance manuals that contain an op*mal balance of Time-‐based and Condi*on-‐based maintenance
TbM vs CbM Maintenance task Interval Det. Model? Diagnos5c tools? Prognosis on remaining life? Subjec5ve Judgment Scopes 100% Costs quan5fiable?
Time-‐Based “Wash” windows Fixed – 2x yearly No No No Some*mes Yes – defined Yes – predicted
Condi5on-‐Based Inspect sealant and repair, as req’d Certain years, but afer *me lapse (delayed) Yes Some*mes Some*mes Almost always Scope *ed to findings Unknown, but es*mated by a model
Elements of the Model
Degrada*on Curves
Survivor Curves
Type 1: Degrada*on Curves
Type 2: Survivor Curves
Curve Overlay: Mul*variate Model
The Six Phases of the Model
• Phase 1 – “Too early to tell” • Phase 2 – “The emergence of poten*al failures” • Phase 3 – “Gehng past the global minima” • Phase 4 – “Gehng to local maxima” • Phase 5 – “Striving for global maxima” • Phase 6 – “Finding a new global maxima”
Phase 1: “Too early to tell”
Phase 2: “Emergence of ‘P’ ”
Phase 3: “Gehng past G-‐Minima”
Phase 4: Gehng to L-‐maxima
Phase 5: Striving for G-‐Maxima
Phase 6: A New G-‐Maxima?
Further Developments • Degrada*on Curves
– Need increased data from domain experts • Survivor Curves
– Data needs to be included in long term study of failures in different condi*ons, regions, etc.
• Minimas and Maximas – Encourage private sector to share data
• Beyond Economic Repair – Quan*fy density of deficiencies to help further define BER
• Total Cost of Ownership
Conclusions • TbM doesn’t fit many building enclosure assets
• Adding CbM helps streamline and reduce maintenance over the long-‐term, based on empirical data and sta*s*cal analysis
• Op*mizing TbM and CbM can guard again under-‐maintaining and over-‐maintaining
Q&A