Designing Quality into the product

35
A central concept is that quality cannot be tested for! Testing programs are based on testing a statistically significant number of samples However to be absolutely sure that all of your product meets specifications you would have to test everything. Testing by itself will not insure quality and is inefficient Testing is required under the GMP’s Raw materials In-process samples Final Product Quality (identity, safety, efficacy, potency, purity, stability, consistency) must be designed into the production process Begins with predetermined specifications Raw material specifications In-process material specifications Final Product Specifications Designing Quality into the product

description

Designing Quality into the product. A central concept is that quality cannot be tested for! Testing programs are based on testing a statistically significant number of samples However to be absolutely sure that all of your product meets specifications you would have to test everything. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Designing Quality into the product

Page 1: Designing Quality into the product

A central concept is that quality cannot be tested for! ◦ Testing programs are based on testing a statistically significant number of

samples

However to be absolutely sure that all of your product meets specifications you would have to test everything.

◦ Testing by itself will not insure quality and is inefficient

◦ Testing is required under the GMP’s Raw materials In-process samples Final Product

◦ Quality (identity, safety, efficacy, potency, purity, stability, consistency) must be designed into the production process

◦ Begins with predetermined specifications Raw material specifications In-process material specifications Final Product Specifications

Designing Quality into the product

Page 2: Designing Quality into the product

Validation – An Essential Part of GMP!

Validation is the scientific study of a system To prove that the facility/system/equipment/method is

consistently doing what it is supposed to do (i.e., that the process is under control).

◦ We want to make decisions based on good science and not hunches and assumptions!

To determine the process variables and acceptable limits for these variables, and to set-up appropriate in-process controls.

◦ Is it ok if the wash from a chromatography column is pH 6.8 vs. 7.0 ?

What is Validation

Page 3: Designing Quality into the product

Biomanufacturing is a complex process involving multiple unit operations many of which are critical to insuring patient safety

and product efficacy

Validation in Biomanufacturing

Page 4: Designing Quality into the product

Inoculum Seed Fermentation

Production Fermentation Harvest

Ultrafiltration1

Chrom. 11

Ultrafiltration2

Chrom. 2

Viral Filtration

Chrom.3

Ultrafiltration3

Final Formulation/

Sterile Filtration

Sterile Fill

UPSTREAM

DOWN-STREAM

VIRAL

NON-VIRAL

Block Flow Diagram of a Typical Production Process

Page 5: Designing Quality into the product

A central concept in quality is that quality cannot be tested for. Quality must be designed and built into the production process.

Requires careful attention to raw material specifications, in process material specifications, and final product specifications.

Validation in Biomanufacturing

Page 6: Designing Quality into the product

The FDA’s definition of validation:

“Validation is a process of demonstrating, through documented evidence, that a process, procedure, method, piece of equipment, or facility will consistently produce a product or result that meets predetermined specifications and quality attributes.”

Validation

Page 7: Designing Quality into the product

Identity

◦ 21 CFR 211.84 (d) at least one test shall be conducted to verify the identity of each component of a drug product.

◦ Chemical, biological, immunological◦ Raw materials, in-process intermediates, final products.

Safety◦ 21 CFR 600.3 (p) safety as the relative freedom from harmful effect to persons affected, directly or

indirectly, by a product when prudently administered, taking into consideration the character of the product in relationship to the condition of the recipient at the time. Activity of active ingredients Activity of the excipients or additives Activity of process related impurities

Efficacy◦ Effectiveness of the product in achieving its medicinal purpose (therapeutic, prophylactic, diagnostic).

Gathered at Phase II and Phase III trials. Potency

◦ 21 CFR 600.3 (s) specific ability or capacity of the product, as indicated by its appropriate laboratory tests or by adequately controlled clinical data obtained through the administration of the product in the manner indicated to effect the given result.

Purity◦ 21 CFR 600.3 (r) relative freedom from extraneous matters in the finished product, whether or not

harmful to the recipient or deleterious to the product. Cleaning Procedures

Stability◦ 21 CFR 211.137 (a) to assure that a drug product meets applicable standards of identity, quality, and

purity at the time of use; it shall bear an expiration date determined by stability testing. Drugs may use accelerated time studies, biologics must use real time studies.

Consistency◦ The ability of the product and/or process to reliably possess specified quality attributes on an ongoing

basis. 3 consecutive batches of product meeting predetermined specifications is accepted as proof that a process is consistent. However, in NDA data from up to twenty batches may be submitted.

Quality Attributes

Page 8: Designing Quality into the product

Validating the performance of unit operations, analytical methods, and critical process points (sterilization, viral inactivation, cleaning procedures) is essential in ensuring that the process generates a quality product.

Validation in Biomanufacturing

Page 9: Designing Quality into the product

Assumptions concerning virus inactivation resulted in 1955 in ten deaths and 200 children becoming paralyzed in the US, from a supposedly “inactivated” polio vaccine.

Assumptions about sterilization caused severe infections among burn victims given supposedly sterile solutions.

Validation eliminates assumptions and relies on experimental proof!

Historical Basis for Validation

Page 10: Designing Quality into the product

Validation does not replace testing, but it does reduce the testing burden for raw materials, in-process materials, and final product

Validation in Biomanufacturing

Page 11: Designing Quality into the product

Validation itself is a process that evolves with the product.

Validation requirements for production of pre-clinical material much less stringent then for phase III clinical material.

Critical operations: raw materials, analytical methods, viral clearance, sterilization, cleaning.

Validation in Biomanufacturing

Page 12: Designing Quality into the product

Some operations are more critical than others. ◦ Viral filtration, sterilization, cleaning, analytical

methods.

◦ These operations will require greater validation efforts then less critical operations (media blending).

Critical Operations in Biomanufacturing

Page 13: Designing Quality into the product

How critical is the system being validated to final product quality?

◦ Media blending systems for cell growth vs. final fill & finish operations

Demonstrating that the device which fills, labels, and caps the final product will require more extensive validation then the blenders used to prepare media for bioreactors.

Validation of complex devices can take years!

Critical Systems

Page 14: Designing Quality into the product

Proceeds in stages with new facilities / equipment.

Planning for validation should start with the design process.

Leaving validation to the last minute is asking for trouble.

Validation

Page 15: Designing Quality into the product

Starts with Design & Receipt:◦ Does the equipment meet the needs (is the autoclave big

enough?)◦ Do you have the manuals, spare parts, can you plug it in? ◦ Is it installed properly (drain lines, vents, etc)

Does it work? ◦ Does the autoclave reach the necessary temp. and

pressure? ◦ Can the autoclave sterilize your equipment (worse case

situation)? How does it work in the manufacturing process?

◦ Can it handle production quantities? ◦ Will failure compromise product quality?

Stages of Validation

Page 16: Designing Quality into the product

What parameters are critical to sterilization? ◦ Temperatures, pressures, time, pore size (filtration),

radiation dosage, chemical concentration.

Must demonstrate that your autoclave reaches the temperatures, pressures, and times necessary for sterilization.

Must demonstrate that items representing real world samples achieve those conditions (20 ft of 1 ½ hose; a 20 L carboy; a 500 ml bottle).

Must challenge with worse case scenario (may take place in pilot plant if scalability demonstrated).

What does “validation of any sterilization process” mean ?

Page 17: Designing Quality into the product

21 CFR 211 Subpart F –Production and Process Controls 211.100 –Written procedures; deviations (a) Requires written procedures for production and process control designed to assure that products

possess the quality attributes that they purport or are represented to possess. (b) Requires that any deviations from written production and process control procedures be recorded

and justified. 211.101 – Change in of components 211.103 – Calculation of yield 211.105 – Equipment identification 211.110 – Sampling and testing of in-process materials and drug products “Requires that control procedures be established to monitor the output and validate the performance

of those manufacturing processes that may be responsible for causing variability of in process material and drug product.”

211.111 – Time limit on production 211.113 – Control of microbiological contamination “Requires that sterilization processes be validated” 211.115 – Reprocessing21 CFR 211 Subpart H- Holding and Distribution 211.165 – Testing and release for distribution “Requires that the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of test methods employed by

the firm shall be established and documented. Such validation and documentation may be accomplished in accordance with 21 CFR 211.194 (a)(2)”

21 CFR 211 Subpart I- Laboratory Controls21 CFR 211 Subpart J – Record and Reports21 CFR 820 Quality Systems Regulations

Regulatory requirement for validation

Page 18: Designing Quality into the product

Sec. 211.113 Control of microbiological contamination.

(a) Appropriate written procedures, designed to prevent objectionable microorganisms in drug products not required to be sterile, shall be established and followed.

(b) Appropriate written procedures, designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile, shall be established and followed. Such procedures shall include validation of any sterilization process.

Regulatory requirement for validation

Page 19: Designing Quality into the product

A fully validated process is “locked in” Any change outside of the validated space

invalidates process

Change must be evaluated for effect on patient safety and product efficacy

Validation in Biomanufacturing

Validated Production Process

Δ

Page 20: Designing Quality into the product

The Validation Life Cycle

Page 21: Designing Quality into the product

Specific protocols (SOP’s) that provide detailed information on what is to be validated.

Validation Protocols consist of: ◦ A description of the process, equipment, or

method to be validated.◦ A description of the validation method.◦ A description of the sampling procedure

including the kind and number of samples.◦ Acceptance criteria for test results. ◦ Schedule or criteria for revalidation.

Validation Protocol

Page 22: Designing Quality into the product

Validation Protocols may consist of multiple SOP’s each describing specific steps in the validation process

Validation Protocol

Page 23: Designing Quality into the product

Starts with Design & Receipt:◦ Does the equipment meet the needs (is the autoclave big

enough?)◦ Do you have the manuals, spare parts, can you plug it in? ◦ Is it installed properly (drain lines, vents, etc)

Does it work? ◦ Does the autoclave reach the necessary temp. and

pressure? ◦ Can the autoclave sterilize your equipment (worse case

situation)? How does it work in the manufacturing process?

◦ Can it handle production quantities? ◦ Will failure compromise product quality?

Stages of Validation

Page 24: Designing Quality into the product

Installation Qualification (IQ)A process used to document that the piece of equipment was supplied and installed properly and that appropriate utilities, i.e., electrical, steam, gas, etc. are available to operate the equipment according to the manufacturers specifications.

Operational Qualification (OQ)A process designed to supply the documented evidence that a piece of equipment operates as it is intended through all anticipated operational ranges.

Performance (Process) Qualification (PQ)Verifies that a process / piece of equipment performs as it is intended to in the manufacturing process and produces product (in process or final) meeting predetermined specifications.

IQ, OQ, PQ ?

Page 25: Designing Quality into the product

Example of a protocol for the IQ component of validating apH meter

As with all other SOP’s this document will contain an Objective, Scope, and ResponsibilitySection.

Page 26: Designing Quality into the product

Name and description of equipment, including model numbers

Identification, including model and serial numbers Location of the equipment Any utility requirements, i.e. electrical voltage,

steam or water pressure, etc. Any safety features of the equipment, including

alarms, interlocks, or relief valves. That all documentation, including manufacturers

contact information, spare parts inventory, operational manual, and installation drawings are available on site.

Typical information in an IQ protocol

Page 27: Designing Quality into the product

OQ Protocol

Example of a protocol for the OQ component of validating apH meter

As with all other SOP’s this document will contain an Objective, Scope, and ResponsibilitySection.

O

Page 28: Designing Quality into the product

OQ ProtocolExample of a protocol for the OQ component of validating anautoclave

As with all other SOP’s this document will contain an Objective, Scope, and ResponsibilitySection.

Page 29: Designing Quality into the product

Objective Responsibility Equipment required (Calibration verification

& Traceability) SOP(s) used Equipment Identification Parameters measured (Specifications) Documentation

Typical OQ Protocol Components

Page 30: Designing Quality into the product

Ideally validation takes place prior to actual production runs, however in some cases validation may take place as product is produced, or past production runs may be used to provide validation data.

Prospective Validation

Concurrent Validation

Retrospective Validation

Validation

Page 31: Designing Quality into the product

A prospective validation study

IQ

OQ

Calibration

PQ protocol approval

PQ protocol execution

Data Analysis

Validation Report

Approve Conclusions

Page 32: Designing Quality into the product

A concurrent / retrospective validation study

Are systems

qualified?NoCalibrations

Correct ?

Data Analysis

Qualify systemCalibrate system

No

Yes

Yes

Approval

Page 33: Designing Quality into the product

The V-ModelUser

RequirementsSpecification

(URS)

FunctionalSpecification

Detail Design

Implement/Build

InstallationQualification

OperationalQualification

PerformanceQualification

Related to

Related to

Related to

33

Page 34: Designing Quality into the product

Project PlanAgreed by team membersDetails phases, activities, and milestones Gantt Chart most commonly used

Planning for Validation

ID Task Name Start Finish DurationJan 2003

1/12 1/19

1 15d1/31/031/13/03Design

5 5d3/28/033/24/03Obtain Funding

6 15d4/18/033/31/03Construct

7 10d5/2/034/21/03Commission

10d6/5/035/23/03Validate

2 10d2/14/032/3/03Prepare Quality Plan

3 5d2/21/032/17/03Prepare URS

4 20d3/21/032/24/03Prepare Project JustificationDocument

Feb 2003 Mar 2003 Apr 2003 May 2003

1/26 2/2 2/9 2/16 2/23 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11

9

8

1d6/6/036/6/03Turnover - Project Complete

Page 35: Designing Quality into the product

Putting it all together

35

GoodEngineering

Practice

TheCompliance

Pyramid