Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

41
SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service. Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences Peter van Waart ([email protected]) Bas Leurs ([email protected]) Berlin, October 14, 2010 Designing Meaningful Education as a Service SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

description

Workshop at the Service Design Conference, Berlin, 2010

Transcript of Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

Page 1: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences

Peter van Waart ([email protected])

Bas Leurs ([email protected])

Berlin, October 14, 2010

Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Page 2: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

[email protected]

Experience = ‘Erlebnis’ / ‘Erfahfrung’

What is Experience?

Page 3: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Can you influence how something is experienced?A stay in a hotel is more than just sleeping. One can design for an experience in all phases.

What one remembers is how it was experienced emotionally.

Page 4: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

What is ≠ how it’s experienced

f/[email protected] [email protected]

10

5

15

20

25

30

Brrr,…cold! Pffft,…warm!

Page 5: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Human values

The wordle displays the

terminal values defined by

Rokeach, M. (1973).

The Nature of Human Values.

New York: The Free Press.

“desirable, transsituational goals, varying in importance, that serve as guiding principles in peoples’ lives” (Schwarz, 2003)

Page 6: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

humanvalues

Inspired by P. Desmet: Model of product emotions. 2002. TU Delft.

meaning

Process of interpreting meaning

stimuli

Page 7: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

What about your experiences?

• Think of three meaningful moments from you (bachelor) study

• Describe the situation (actors, context) and the emotions that you did feel. (make drawings)

• Share your story, discuss it with others

Page 8: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

What about your experiences?

• What do all these experiences have in common?

• What are the differences?• What’s important / remarkable?

• Present your findings on a flip chart

Page 9: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Student Experience Survey at Rotterdam University

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Page 10: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

ManagementExperience

boarddirectors

back office, front office(grades administration, time tables)

course management

teaching staffstudent

Page 11: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

studentpeer teaching staff

back office, front office

course management

directorsboard

StudentExperience

Page 12: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Student Experience

1) Experience, what’s that?

2) Student Experience Survey

3) What should we do?

Page 13: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Reason: Isn’t it there or don’t you just see it?

“Students don’t perveive coherency in the curriculum!”

Because:

- There is no coherency, or…

- Coherency is not perceived?

1987porsche944 (sort of back)@flickr.com

Page 14: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Reason: Isn’t it there or don’t you just see it?

“Students don’t perveive coherency in the curriculum!”

Because:

- There is no coherency, or…Action: create more coherency

- Coherency is not perceived?Action: show coherency

1987porsche944 (sort of back)@flickr.com

Page 15: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Student Experience Survey

Page 16: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

• Methods• Results

– By theme– By category– General + Specific

• Conclusions and recommendations

Page 17: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

The team

• 4 teachers• 8 students

Page 18: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Students and other actors

Student experience• Students (of 2 courses) • Office• External affairs• ICT support• Teachers• Mentors

Page 19: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Sample

Year CMD n =

1 5 10

2 5 10

3 5 7

4 4 4

Year GMT n =

1 5 10

2 5 5

3 5 -

4 5 -

Total 39 60

Page 20: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Method

1. Data collection1. Motivation graph

2. Interviews (laddering)

2. Analysis and interpretation

Page 21: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Method: Motivation graph

Student completes motivation graph:1. Average (0), above average (+1), below average (-1)

2. Moment / situation

Page 22: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Method: Interviews

Interview

(laddering: reveal emotions)

Page 23: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Method: Analysis

- Coding (categories)- Signify meaning

Page 24: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Results

Page 25: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Results: themes year 1

cate

gorie

s

t

hem

es

Confirmation Confrontations Getting

organised

Finalise

Excited+

_Insecure

Confusion Orientation

Acknowledgement Accomplishment

Disappointment

+

_

+

_

+

_

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Page 26: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Be at mercy Being put to

the test

Re-orientation Judgement

time

Excited+

_High pressure

Frustration

Overwhelmed

Satisfaction

Disillusion

+

_

+

_

+

_

Full of expectations

Proud

Grateful

Disoriented

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

ca

tego

ries

the

mes

Results: themes year 2

Page 27: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Lonely Contemplating Cold shower Open end

Thrilling+

_DisrespectAbandonedFrustration

Insecure (GMT)

Boredom (CMD)

Challenged+

_

+

_

+

_

Proud (GMT)

Reassurement (CMD)

Neglection

Frustration

Rewarded

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

internship

ca

tego

ries

the

mes

Results: themes year 3

Page 28: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Acceleration Wrap-up Pelgrimage Transformation

EnthousiastHome coming+

_Insecure High pressure

+

_

+

_

+

_

RewardingThrilling

Restless

Accomplishment

“Departure”

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

graduation

ca

tego

ries

the

mes

Results: themes year 4

Page 29: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Result: Emotional Journey

Acceleration Wrap up Pelgrimage Transformation

Lonely Contemplation Cold shower Open end

Be at mercy Being put

to test

Re-orientation Judgement

time

Confirmation Confrontations Getting

organised

Finalise

1

2

3

4

internship

graduation

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Page 30: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Structural problems: facilities

• Electricity– Inflexibile layout of classrooms– Not enough power outlets– Outlets not connected

• Internet– Wireless no connection– Not enough outlets (ethernet)

Page 31: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Structural problems: information

• Too late – Internship / Graduation – Time tables– Changes in time tables

• Unclear– Grades– Verbal confirmation– Crucial information is unclear

• Not accessible– Many seperate websites– Global search option is missing

Page 32: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Structural problems: behaviour from teachers

• Little personal feedback on assignments

• Late/no reply to e-mail• Little commitment to students

Page 33: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Structural problems: organisation

• Year 2 = year 1• Too much teamwork but no flexible schedules• A desire for more attention from teachers on extra-curriculair events• Mentality: studying doesn’t necessarily mean ‘going to school’

Page 34: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Research results

Most negative experiences- Feeling of non-existence / lack of acknowledgement- Lack of trust (promises are hardly kept)- Not enough personal feedback

Frustrations:- Stress- Information is missing, incomplete, incomprehensible and late (most of the

time)- Power and internet outlets

Page 35: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Physiological needs electricity, internet, work spaces,

Security grades, timetables, choices

Self-actualisation graduation, DesignThis!, internship

class, involvement of teachers, events at schoolLove and belonging

Esteem need Open project, personal feedback, student-assistent

director(s), facility management, ICT

office, ict

teachers, coordinators, external affairs

teachers, coordinators

teachers, coordinators, external affairs

Conclusies: pyramide van studentbehoeften

Page 36: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Mental model of the organisation

student

FacilitiesClientsBuilding

GradesTimetables

Class ProjectsTeacher

Facility

management

ICT

Backoffice

Frontoffice

student student student

Management

Coordination

External Affairs

CompaniesInternship

Director

student

Page 37: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Student

Experience

facilitiescli

ents

build

ing

Grade syste

m

time tabels

class

project

teacher

The student’s mental model

companies

internship

Page 38: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Now what?

Enhance the experience of the student throughout the course

Page 39: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

What to do?

1. Enhanced concentration and focus, all senses involved

2. Altered awareness of time

3. Emotional commitment

4. Unique individual process

5. Acting with ‘raw stuff’

6. Encompass a process of acting and immersion van doen en ondergaan

7. Element of play (flow)

8. To be in control

9. Balancing challenges and competencies

10. Clear goals

* Characteristics of an experience according Boswijk, Thijssen & Peelen, 2005;2007

interior, smell, colour, vision, sound, furniture, canteen

immersive workshops, events

‘my’ class/team/teacher/school

personal feedback

clients, technology/hardware

projects, events, to create / build

projects, events, to create / build

dealing with complaints, span of control, influence

open Project, Honours Programme

vision, coherency, objectives

What to achieve?* What to offer?

Page 40: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

SDN Conference, Berlin 2010. Designing Meaningful Education as a Service.

Concluding remarks

• Acknowledge the student (‘I am’)

• Give personal feedback

• Put the student in charge (provide solutions for missing grades)

• Communicate how there is dealt with complaints (solved / unsolved)

• Keep your promises and tell the truth

• Organise events to celebrate the start and ending of projects or periods. Celebrate milestones/successes.

• Students are central, not the processes (means and end?)

Page 41: Designing Meaningful Education as a Service

studentpeer teaching staff

back office, front office

course management

directorsboard

StudentExperience