Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
-
Upload
hafiz-azman -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
1/20
' . t l btc$ ]1i \oelearning.utm.my
,ffi outtlnesf his hapter:. How o use he root locus o design ascadecompensatorso improvehe steady-stateerror. How o use he root locus o design ascadecompensatorso improvehe transient
response. How o use he root locuso design ascadecompensatorso improve oth he steady-stateerror and he transient esponse. How o use he root locus o design eedbackcompensatorso improvehe transientresponse
UPNMNIVERSITIERTAHANANASIONALIIALAYSIAEEE321Control ngineeringDesignia RootLocus
Revised y S.PChewlvlarch 7, 2010
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
2/20
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
3/20
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
4/20
elearning.utm.my
ComoensatorsO Integral ompensatorsre used o imprcve teady-statefroro Dervative ompensatorsreused o improveransientesponseOldealcompensatorsustbe mplementedithactivenehvorksuch asactive mplifiers ndpossible dditionalower ources.Oother design echniqueshat precludehe use of activedevices ofcompensationan be adopted.These comPensators,hich can beimplemented ithpassive lements uchas resisto6and capacitors,do not use pure integration nd differentiation nd are not idealcompensators.OAdvantagesf passive etworks re that hey are less expensive nddo not equire dditionalower ourcesor heiropetion.ETheir disadvantages that he steady-siaterror s not driven o zero ncaseswhere deal ompensatorsield eroerrot
lmproving teady-state rror via cascadecomDensationThisdesigns to imorovehesteadv-staterrorwithout lffeqtinqthe ransientesponse.
dr , r , r 4rerr | i3 fPoleatA is noton heroot ocuswith
4
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
5/20
elearning.utm.my
ldeal ntegralCompensationPl)
0 02 et er lsb=\zt ) t3a '
PoleA s approximatelyn heroot ocuswithcompensatof
. thesteady-staterrorsimprovedithoutaffectinghe ransientresponse. A compensatorithapole at heorigin ndazero closeo hepolescalled n deal ntegralcompensator.
- rysi,r- !9
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
6/20
elearning.utm.my
uncompensatedystem Compensatedystem
W""::,:"""1"t:1,',n""10"",,"n,"","",pensato,s epresenteds. . x,)c.r,t= , *& = -\-{1
Since he figure has both proportionalnd integral ontrol, he idealintegral ontroller,r compensator,sgivenaltenale 'amePlcontrollet.
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
7/20
elearning.utm.my
{Mn.3c*re's*r"' Thestatic elocity rrcrconslanr:
fto$( p.,tfcrrsbrl .- Conholler ransfer unciionl'* ' l i ]# 6.(0 = :-:a
+ r^= xn' lL, Y,,,. Type1 uncompensaledystemib. Type1 compensatedyslemi
] LagCompensator>ldeal ntegral ompensation,ith tspoleon the origin, equires nactiventegrator>lf we usepassive etwork,he poleandzeroare movedo the eft,close o theorigin.>The idealcompensatorrives he steady-stateffor o zero,a lagcompensatoritha pole hat s notat the originwill mprovehestaticeror constant y a factotequalo z.tp".>Therealsowill be a minimal ffectupon he kansient esponsefthepole-zeroairofthecompensators placed lose o theorigin.
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
8/20
elearning.utm.my
Example:compensate he sysiemwhose oot ocu6 s shownbelow toimprovehe steady-staterrorby a factorof 10 f the system s
; =4.174 .+ K =164.6
6 =I=ss23"20
, =--L=--L=n.163"" l+(" l+8.23
CompensatedystemCbmpcattto'
" = -L= o.oror' - l+l{r6 =L9o=l-oo1o8=91.590.0108
p" K,, 4.23Arbitrarilyelecting
P' =0 01
- z.= I t . I3p. E0.11I
hf l)( ,+2)(J_10)
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
9/20
elearning.utm.my
14.6nFi.d
il-rti:-rnitPredidedcharacteristics fand ag-compensatedystems
n"Step esponsesf uncompensated ..,lar-comoensatedystems
lmprovingransientesponseviacascadeompensation'This s to design responsehat hasadegjlablc-pc@9o19!9l9hoqlandshorterettlinqime han heuncompensatedystem..Acompensatoras he ransferunctions ollows
G,(s)=51'"".This function,he sum of a differentiatornd a puregain, s calledanidealde vative,ot elD391@l!9!..This ypeof compensationequires n activenetworkor ts rcalizationlnstead,t approximatesifferentiationith a passive etwork y addinga zefoanda moredistant ole o the oMard-pathransferunction.
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
10/20
elearning.utm.my
Usingdealderivativeb. ompensatorero at -2;
c. compnsatoreroat -3;d. compensatorero at - 4
10
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
11/20
elearninS.utm.my
Predicted haracteristicsor the systemsCompd$adonc Cohpematioid
21.722.34125.13
2.!126121
(J:. i )f* ,ri" + t51.251.5113t0t5
{'+ l-,(, rX" i)
t513
0 1074 !6X
fl
ffi im:mated svstemnddealerivatlve
1.000.750.5n0.25
t, 1.0Time scon.ls)
11
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
12/20
elearning.utm.my
Example 2: Given the followingsysiem, design an idealcompensatoro yielda 16010vershoot, iih a thrcefold eductionn
' 0.504 59 14"-t.205 : 2.064
Root ocus oruncompensated
Settlingime: r,=--L=:=3.32(a, |.205
Thenewsettlingime s settobe1.107 6 = -= -- =3.613r, 1.107,J, / 3.613tan(59.74")6.193
Evaluatinghe locationof the compensating
d= 3.006, (rL 4+120.26=(21+l)180 180"
3#=t-(rso' es ') =
\2
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
13/20
elearning.utm.my
compennted system lJncompensatedndcompensatedsystem
:,"
,A^. .,fffi] UncomnensatedndcompensatedystemWT charactenstlcslrnconp.n.n d Slmlrdd Cm!.nr.t d Slmul.don
PtudrndwMlnid0rl\miinn lnls 1.205 i2 061
./1
1522
X(r 1006,.(r +-lX.Q )Ln]] ljd.r9a
t.l.ll 16 .3t6 t .1071.7 i).507
lold-zco
13
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
14/20
elearning.utm.my
lAo PoController. The deal derivativecompensator sd o improve h translentresponses mplementedwith a proportional-plus-drivativePD)controller.. The eadcompensator5 a passiv etworkused o overcomethe disadvantagesf ideal differentiationandstill retain heability to improve he tranlient response.
C.(r)=K(s+2.)=K,r+KrK
Example: Designhreeead ompensatorsor he ollowingsystemhatwill educehesettlingimebya actor f2 whilemaintaining0% vershoot.omparehesystem haracteristicsbetweenhe hreedesigns.nu. ^_" ti", f-;---l
Lead ompensator esign,showing valuation funcompensatedndcompensatedomlnantpoles
14
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
15/20
elearning.utm.my
Nole;This lgure s notd|dih to scrle.r"planepictureu5edo calculatethe location f the comPensatorpole
CompeBdted system
Comparisonf leadcompensationdesignsT$r.9,a ciaDdisolb.ddFNrtridatr*ttEt pL9a
Ur..ed.bd CaD.rld.ir
';
:i,;r){r.6i fi;-ii;;il; 3.ir ,
.sinruidbll!es:!a'.M'
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
16/20
elearning.utm.my
@ :mm*tedsvstemandead
l..lt .2l {)0.8
0.20
Llncornpeosr.d
A.fl&S' lmprovinEteady-StaterrorandTransient esponse98lFfl .Tne esignan se ither ctiverpassrveompensaors.l f we design n activePDcontrollerollowed y an Pl controller,the resulting ompensatofs calleda proportionalplus-integral-plus-derivativePlD)controller.l f we firstdesign passiveeadcompensatornd hendesignpassiveag compensator,he resulting ompensators calledalag-leadompensatot*. l , , ' *
t ' ,*
t t ]' [ , ( , K' )
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
17/20
elearning.utm.my
f& Thedesign echnique onsistsofthe following\qry steps;1. Evaluate hepClblo?re9ftie-lr@llp9rletedlystem todetermine owmuch mpaovementn ransientesponsesrequrrcc.2. Designhe PDcontrollero meet he ransientesponsespecifications.Thedesigancludeshezero ocation ndthe oopgain.)3. Simulatehesystemo be sureall requirementsavebeenmet.4. Redesignfthe simulationhows hat equirementsavenotDeenmel5. Designhe Pl controlleroyield herequired teady-stateerrot6. Determinehegain6, r '&, and4.7. Simulatehesystemo be sureall requirementsavebeenmet.8. Redsignf the simulationhows hat equirementsavenotbeenmet.
Example4: Given he system shown n the following igure,designa PID controller o that the systemcan operatewith apeak ime hat s two{hirds hatof the uncompensatedystern t200lovershoot ndwithzerosteady-stateffor or a step nputrr,) *o r('r T--_-t-(iiTi---l .t,)-.*qt l (' .,r rr f o) -t-*l -
Uncompensatedeedback ontrol ystem
- - 5.415t 10.57
- Tp= 0.297secRoot ocus or he uncompensatedystem
77
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
18/20
elearning.utm.my
PD-compensaled
t8.31'
a,= = =t) , t / sec" T, (2',3\(0.291\1 o =---- !+=-913tan 17. l3 'From ncompensatedystem:The um fangles -198.37'= 198.37'-180'=8.37'
X* ClosedloopoleCalculatinghe PD ompensatorero
Thus, he PD controllers
15.87- ,
-=mn la.J/z" -8.13- ze
=55 92G-(s) = s+55.92
PD-compensatedystem Root ocus or P|D-compensated
('rr (s) = - ,'
18
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
19/20
elearning.utm.my
l. l
, , ; 0.11 t,l
Step esponsesor uncompensated,PD-compensated,ndPID-compensatedystems
T6bl.1U7 A Smmsry ot dlo ChaFqt rltlica ol PfiGtLedand Phs$&g Colnp.nsqtion lietwork.
'1.r-! x
i I irsr \ nr $r( n*il(i.,ri nL ,!i trr ix ll 'l ! \ l! '!re1. r r(.n!N tr$l ili.lLlft)n.dI l'trrNl*itsutrh|'nrli,Ia: l'.rr:r.1:\;i { I ' id'e Lt1(f..-r. lhr,.{t 4hrn.'t!r!'*I R?!N *tJd,!r l ,I '/,r.1 !trtrL lM,cr*i-ndn,.!tr r,{l d!\I {:! trrl.s! !*r. , .rrd! .ltrrnrl|&na I'i /rL r. trokr \r | !r h! trani$ | ' jr!*. ,! d.',iiI \ ihrr nin. l ( .1n!rr l rkrr l r . : r
nifiiln$!r fl 'r{ lx. L, \i!L.l 'n.'!-,lxtr !$! i rs l ' r r ) ,ntr .$L,+\[ .( !anq$a!tr r1i t .n ' "t i ) r ! J, l rsrr i , r r \I llcj rtr\- \* ! t l!3ia{nlrll| !\rt)$\\:,$r' J.!d!*r r.,,I Rdr{.n.rn1 rk.,r,!,I $.\r rntr D rnr*i ,rt,ri-1 ri\,.{! r.l$*c rlr-.i.e!!r. !
t . \1r.n j . ! r . , . rdr. .r ! . r ! r i l i . r t1. \a.r !} l\d Ir;n!$.r r .- :ri'6 *l{er.rltr{; rt , r r '.|+i '!r hlN {I|n'
19
-
8/9/2019 Design via Root Locus -Control engineering
20/20
elearning.utm.my
oFllon.l Anplili4ckut ldcmlardoEc.d-ffi
G.'** i , . , , ',
- nlnd&c']r ,..," ^, ,,,t 4 r"{i,r;::'