Design for Manufacturability Seminar
-
Upload
nithink100 -
Category
Documents
-
view
39 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Design for Manufacturability Seminar
Design for Manufacturability 1
Design For Manufacturability ( DFM)
C.Devanathan,
200821522,
CIM II Year.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 2
Contents Introduction and Definition History of DFM DFM Principle Why DFM Objectives of DFM DFM activities DFM typical approach DFM Tools and methodology DFM in Electronics Industry Case study
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 3
Introduction DFM is product design considering
manufacturing requirements DFM is the first step in which a team
approach is taken to develop the product.
DFM is an umbrella which covers a variety of tools and techniques to accomplish a manufacturable product.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 4
Introduction Design for manufacturability is the
process of proactively designing products to (1) Optimize all the manufacturing functions: fabrication, assembly, test, procurement, shipping, delivery, service, and repair.2) Assure the best cost, quality, reliability, regulatory compliance, safety, time-to-market, and customer satisfaction.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 5
Definition
Design for Manufacturing (DFM) is a development practice emphasizing manufacturing issues throughout the product development process.
Successful DFM results in lower production cost without sacrificing product quality.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 6
History of DFM
Principles of DFM are not new.– Awareness of importance of designing
parts for easy manufacturing is key for all time.
– Difference is in the use of standards and design guides during the beginning stages of the design and not later
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 7
Eli Whitney (early 1800’s)
Made use of standardizing the design of the lock on the musket so that interchangeable parts could be used
Before him, all muskets were made by craftsmen and no two muskets were the same or used the same parts.
His parts were built to specs and a tolerances
He organized a mass production process for locks
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 8
History Contd.,
Book edited by Richard Bolz who organized the DFM methodology
DFM was originally called producibility (1960’s) and then manufacturability (1970’s) and then Design for Manufacturability (1985)
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 9
DFM Principles
Use of standardsUse of common componentsDesign to specifications and
tolerancesUse of manufacturing guidelines in
the early stages of design that maximize quality of manufactured part
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 10
DFM Principles
Minimize the use of materialsMinimize the use of floor space in
plantLocate all necessary components
near functional operationUse of automated machining for
minimal errors
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 11
Why DFM?
60% of overall product cost is determined by decisions made early in the design process
75% of manufacturing cost is determined by design drawings and specifications
70 – 80% of all products’ defects are directly related to design issues
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 12
Why DFM?
Lower development costShorter development timeFaster manufacturing start of
buildLower assembly and test costsHigher quality
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 13
Objective of DFM
To identify product concepts that are easy to manufacture
Focus on component design for ease of manufacture and assembly
Integrate manufacturing to ensure the best match of needs and requirements.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 14
Activities of DFM
An analysis of the complete product in order to simplify its design.
An analysis of each individual part to maximize its manufacturability.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 15
DFM Typical Approach
DesignTest Tool Build
Launch
finishstart
Product Development Steps
Product Development team making it happen!!- Product requirements and deliverables- DFM tools and methods
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 16
DFM Typical Approach
Product Team– EE– Project Manage– Component Engineer– Purchasing– Fab., process engineer– Assembly process engineer– Test engineer– Quality engineer– Uses DFM tools and methods
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 17
For a Sound DFM Team:
Training / Education of several types are needed:
Attitudinal training. Clear role clarification. Information – sharing. Involvement and participation
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 18
DFM Tools and Methodology
Use of the Standard Guidelines.Design For Assembly (DFA), (IBM
experience)Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
(FMEA), (Sun example)Taguchi Method, (Hitachi
experience)
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 19
DFM Tools and Methodology
Value Analysis--”Value Engineering” (HP example)
Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Going to the Gemba (Hitachi)
Group Technology, (IBM example)Cost management and
optimization, SPC, Six-Sigma (Motorola), TQC, etc
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 20
DFM Tools Pro’s and Con’sTechnique Advantage Disadvantage
Guidelines Cost and Effort Management Team Approach
Exceptions to list
Taguchi Systematic Narrows
possibilities
Management “Buy-in” Designer Effort
FMEA Systematic Priortizte corrective
action Provides guidance
Management Rates only ease of
assembly
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 21
DFM Tools: ComparisonsDFM ACTIVITY
DFM TOOLS PRODUCT SIMPLIFY PROCESS FUNCTIONALCONCEPT CONCEPT NEEDS NEEDS
DESIGN GUIDELINES X XDESIGN FOR ASSEMBLY XTAGUCHI X XCUMPUTER AIDED DFM X X X XGROUP TECHNOLOGY X XFMEA X XVALUE ANALYSIS X
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 22
DFM in Electronics Industry
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 23
Consideration and requirements of Electronics Components
Size, form, fit, functionCost and availabilityInitial quality and long term
reliabilityMoisture sensitive device (MSD)
considerations and requirementsSolderability and solder joint
requirements
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 24
Consideration and requirements of Electronics Components
Component to board edge spacing requirements
Component body to body spacing requirements
Component to board CTE requirements
All IC (PGA, BGA, DIP, SIP, SIMM, DIMM, etc.) pins correctly identified
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 25
circuit requirements DCNoise, cross talk, interferenceMicro stripBuried Micro stripAnalogR/FEMIShielding type ImpedanceHigh powerThermal
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 26
PCB material considerations as required
ImpedanceDielectric constantOverall board construction
requirementsDielectric withstanding voltageMoisture and insulation resistanceDielectric breakdown voltageHigh power requirementsR/F and EMI requirements
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 27
Guidelines for DFM in Electronics Industry
More important guidelines for designers of Electronics products:
1. Standardization: Standardize circuit board sizes and dimensions.
2. Utilize the standard components3. Standardize the orientation of the
devices on the board.4. Product simplification
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 28
Guidelines for DFM
5. The number of different hole sizes on the printed board – minimized.
6. The location of identification labels on components – standardized.
7. Minimize / eliminate the adjustments
8. It is advisable to use only one component placement method.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 29
Guidelines for DFM
9. Provide sufficient spacing between leads, vias, and traces – to avoid solder short circuit.
10.Componets that require a press to install- avoided.
11. When flexible circuit boards are used, avoid bends that are sharp so as not to crack copper conduction paths.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 30
Guidelines for DFM
12. Consider the environment in which the product will be manufactured and used.
13. Designers should be aware of the stack-up of positional tolerances.
14.SMT boards require proper size and spacing of mounting pads.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 31
Guidelines for DFM
15.Via holes should not be placed under metal conditions.
16.For, through hole boards, most traces should be on the component side, fewest on the solder side.
17.Use of even number of circuit board layers to reduce the possibility of the circuit board warping when the heat for soldering is applied.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 32
Case Study in Electronics industry
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 33
Beyond Prototypes!! : Design for Manufacturing Concerns for Pico Radio
Test bed Must add draft angle and fillets to
part. This will add complexity to the model and slightly increase the size of the part. Part will be slightly conical instead of perfectly cylindrical to allow part removal from the injection mold.
Currently two sliders are required to form the serial port access hole and the power switch hole. Both holes need to be designed out.
We will need to use larger screw bosses to account for draft angle - PCB cut-outs (hopefully) have been enlarged to account for this.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 34
Beyond Prototypes!! : Design for Manufacturing Concerns for Pico Radio
Test bed Add a feature to screw the
PCB directly to the casing??
Case lid should be stiffer.
Casing design is small enough to be shot on our in-house injection press.
EDM will be required to make this mold. We must located an external vendor for this.
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 35
Our MCAD tools
AutoCAD, SolidworksSDRC’s IDEAS, OpenCascade
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 36
Our ECAD tools
Cadence’s ORCAD– Will be used for Bluetooth radio boards,
schematics and PCB designs– (Old BWRC CAD tools were Zuken Redac for
Layout, Routing, Manufacturing and Viewlogic for the schematics)3
Checking that these new tools can export and import new standards from the ISO
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 37
ECAD MCAD
MOSISchip fab/pack.
PCB Assembly(Outsource)
Moldable Part
Mold Fill
DUCADE
Cut Mold (Out source/In-House)
AP 210
AP 203
AP 203
AP
210 Mold
Cut-ability
Feature Manager
Cybercut Pipeline
{DfM Pipelines (right side of ASU/UCB chart)
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 38
STEP
The Standard for the Exchange of Product model (STEP) Provides a common method of defining product data
Application Protocols (APs) define the content, scope and information requirements of a designated application area
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 39
STEP protocols AP203 and AP210
All mechanical CAD systems export and import STEP files in the AP203 protocol
Electronic assembly interconnect and packaging design is now described in AP210
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 40
STEP AP210
April 1999– ISO (International Organization for
Standardization) accepted STEP Application Protocol as International Standard
• Electronic Assemblies, Interconnection and Packaging
• Printed Wiring Assemblies (PWA)
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 41
Some Industries Following DFM
AT&TBoeingLockheed MartinGE IntelGMFord
ToyotaYahooMicrosoft IBMCisco SystemsHPSonic
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 42
References
Design for Manufacturability Hand book - James G.Bralla.
www.toodoc.com
04/21/23 Design for Manufacturability 43