design folio assessment criteria

© VCAA 2013

Prod

uctio

n/VC

E St

udies

/Adm

in ad

vice

sba/

2013

/SBA

_VisC

omm

.indd

2013 Administrative information for school-based assessment

VCE Visual Communication Design

Units 3 and 4

School-assessed Task

The School-assessed Task contributes 40 per cent to the study score and is commenced in Unit 3.

Teachers will provide to the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA) through VASS a score against each criterion that represents an assessment of the student’s level of performance in achieving Unit 3 Outcome 3 and Unit 4 Outcomes 1 and 2. The recorded scores must be based on the teacher’s assessment of the student’s performance according to the criterion on pages 5–10. This assessment is subject to the VCAA’s statistical moderation process.

The 2013 Visual Communication Design assessment sheet on page 11 is to be used by teachers to record scores. The completed assessment sheet for each student’s School-assessed Task must be available on request by the VCAA. Details of authentication requirements and administrative arrangements for School-assessed Tasks will be updated annually and publication of updated documents will be advised in the February VCAA Bulletin VCE, VCAL and VET and in the current year’s VCE and VCAL Administrative Handbook.

The Authentication Record form on page 12 is to be used to record information for each student and must be made available on request by the VCAA.

The School-assessed Task has three components: • Unit 3 Outcome 3• Unit 4 Outcome 1 and• Unit 4 Outcome 2.

Unit 3

Area of Study 3 – Developing a brief and generating ideas

Outcome 3

Apply design thinking skills in preparing a brief, undertaking research and generating a range of ideas relevant to the brief.

Nature of task

Develop a brief that identifies the contexts, constraints, client needs (two) target audience/s, and a folio generating ideas relevant to the brief.

The development folio for each client need will include evidence of:• use of design process and design thinking strategies• annotated research for information and inspiration• observational and visualisation drawings• generation of a wide range of design ideas.

2013 Administrative information for school-based assessment – VCE Visual Communication Design 2

Scope of task

Students should prepare a single brief that clearly identifies:• the communication needs (two) of an identified client, including constraints and expectations• purposes, including the audience characteristics, for each visual communication• contexts of each visual communication

The brief is prepared in consultation with a real or fictitious client (for example, the teacher may be the client). If a real client is involved and restrictions are imposed that may prevent the student meeting specific criteria, the teacher should ensure that these restrictions are overcome. There is no prescribed format for the brief. Formats that may be considered for the brief include:

• a description of the content of the brief organised under sub-headings• a letter of request, and• a structure that presents the brief in dot points.

The brief should be completed prior to the commencement of the developmental work. Students may need to make final decisions about some aspects of the brief as they work through the design process. The brief should refer to one client and two needs for visual communication. Each of the needs will require separate design processes that will lead to final presentations produced in Unit 4 that are discernibly different in presentation, format and intent. The difference between the two final presentations should be clearly evident in the outline of each of the needs.

Where limited evidence of the brief exists, students should be given at least a ‘Very Low’ for Criterion 1. If a student does not provide a brief or writes the brief retrospectively, ‘Not Shown’ should be recorded for Criterion 1. Where there is more than one brief evident, only the first one should be read and assessed. If the brief only describes one need (for example, a general statement describing ‘Promotional material’) the assessment should be ‘Very Low’ for Criterion 1.

Proposed presentation formats should be numbered ‘Presentation format 1’ and ‘Presentation format 2’ in the brief. Where they are not numbered the first presentation format listed should be assumed to be ‘Presentation format 1’ in any list of formats in the brief. Note that if more than two presentation formats are listed in the brief, then only the first two should be identified as ‘Presentation format 1’ and ‘Presentation format 2’.

The brief is not required to be within a specific word range. Teachers are advised that a sufficient word range to cover the requirements of Outcome 1 is between 400 and 700 words.

The brief should be placed securely at the beginning of the developmental folio. The teacher is required to sign and date the brief on its completion. This information should be recorded on the VCAA Authentication Record Form for VCE Visual Communication Design School-assessed Task on page 12.

The application of the design process should be evident throughout the developmental work. The developmental work should relate to each of the two needs identified in the brief for the stated audience/s. The source of existing imagery and information included for research and inspiration must be clearly documented, using a conventional bibliographic style. It is not sufficient to simply reference ‘google images’.

Assessment of Criterion 2 is based on the student’s use of observation and visualisation drawing with annotations to generate ideas relevant to the brief. Assessment of these drawings should focus on the student’s use of freehand drawing to generate a quality flow of initial ideas. Students are not required to demonstrate the application of a range of media and related materials to score highly on this criterion. It is not appropriate to copy, scan or reproduce original drawings to submit as original freehand drawings. Drawings from observation are used as a means of research. They must include drawings from direct observation of objects, structures and/or forms, rather than drawing only from photographs. A range of creative design thinking strategies should be employed to assist students to extend and record their thinking and ideas.


Unit 4

Area of Study 1 – Development of design concepts

Outcome 1

Develop distinctly different design concepts for each need, and select and refine for each need a concept that satisfies each of the requirements of the brief.

Nature of task

A folio of conceptual developments for each need. The conceptual development folio for each need will include evidence of:

• use of design process and design thinking strategies• application of manual and digital methods, media, materials, design elements, design principles and presenta-

tion formats• development and refinement of concepts• reasons for selection of preferred concepts for each need.

Scope of task

The use of a minimum of two methods should be evident, including manual and digital methods. Selection of each method should be based on what will allow the student to achieve the most effective solution relative to the visual communication needs determined in Unit 3 Outcome 3. Advice about appropriate methods is provided on page 39 of the VCE Visual Communication Design VCE Study Design 2013–2017. Where there is no evidence that a specific method has been used in Unit 4 Outcome 1, but Unit 4 Outcome 2 clearly demonstrates application of such a method, it should not be assumed that this method was used in completion of Outcome 1. If only one method is evident in Unit 4 Outcome 1, students should not be awarded a ‘High’ or ‘Very High’ for Criterion 4.

The use of a range of methods must be presented on annotated hard copy. Evidence of their use should not be presented on a computer disk or USB.

Annotations should be completed in real time, as the folio progresses. They can be handwritten or typed, whichever is appropriate to the process and complimentary to the method being employed at the time. Annotations and evaluations in the developmental folio should reflect the application of specific media and related materials by students. For example, where photography and computer are used as methods (of production), the annotations and evaluations should reflect decisions related to the application of the associated media and materials; where a student is working with manual illustration methods the annotations and evaluation should reflect these methods. A hard copy of a progressive selection of the developmental stages used with digital methods is required. A hard copy does need to be printed in full colour and may be scaled down. Students must provide evidence of the skills and knowledge of both the hardware and software used to produce the work presented for assessment. Teachers should monitor students’ progress on a regular basis and use the Authentication Record form on page 12 to record this information. It is recommended that students back up hard-drive files with copies of work in progress using, for example, a re-writeable CD for large graphic files, or an external drive.

The developmental work for each visual communication need should be separate and distinctly different in intent. Where no discernible difference in intent is evident or only a limited difference can be observed, a ‘Low’ to ‘Very Low’ level of achievement should be recorded. In this situation the level of achievement will be determined by the standard of the work presented. Where artwork included in the folio is not student-generated imagery, the original source should be identified. A copy of the source image along with the acknowledgement of appropriate copyright responsibilities should be clearly identified in the development work. Students should only use direct copying, pre-printed stickers, scrapbooking, clip art, commercial image files, templates or tracing of any ‘found imagery’ if they intend to further develop or manipulate this content significantly. Where there is evidence of an over-reliance on such strategies, with minimal additional contribution by the student, the student’s level of achievement on the criteria should be reduced.

For the purposes of authentication, evidence of the construction of a three-dimensional model may be recorded through a series of photographs. Use of photography in this way should be considered as part of record keeping rather than developmental work; the use of photography in this situation would not be considered as one of the methods used in the design process.


Note that in the case of photography, while the image is on a two-dimensional surface, this is considered to be three-dimensional where the image itself has depth.

Equal quantities of work are not required for each of the selected methods or indeed in the use of two-dimensional and three-dimensional work in the investigation. However, a substantial investigation relative to possible resolutions should be clearly evident within the developmental process. Where some evidence of developmental work exists, at least ‘Very Low’ must be recorded for Criteria 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Unit 4

Area of Study 2 – Final presentations

Outcome 2

Produce final visual communication presentations that satisfy the requirements of the brief.

Nature of task

Two distinct final presentations in two separate presentation formats that fulfil the communication needs of the client as detailed in the brief developed in Unit 3.

Scope of task

Work demonstrating two separate and discernibly different final visual communication presentations is to be presented in two different presentation formats; for example, an A3 flat poster printed on light card and an A5 trifold brochure, printed full colour back and front. The final visual communication presentations are required to reflect resolution/s and communication needs proposed in the brief. There are no restrictions on the size or presentation format of final presentations. Students should clearly label each final presentation on the reverse side of any two-dimensional finals or base of any three-dimensional finals. A representative hard copy of electronic solutions such as an animation or website should be produced and labelled accordingly.

There may be more than one component to a final presentation. Labelling should reflect each component of the final presentation, for example, ‘Presentation 1: Part a, Presentation 1: Part b’, and so on. The labelling should reflect the intentions in the brief. Students should also include their candidate and school identification numbers as part of the labelling of each piece of visual communication in the final presentations. Inadequate labelling can jeopardise student assessment if unclear direction has been provided in the brief and/or final presentations.

Submission of only one final visual communication presentation will result in students being unable to gain a ‘Very High’, ‘High’ or ‘Medium’ on each of Criteria 6, 7 and 8.

Where no final presentations are submitted ‘Not Shown’ should be recorded for Criteria 6, 7 and 8 on the Visual Communication Design School-assessed Task assessment sheet.

Where work is submitted as two final presentations, but only one presentation format is used (for example where two visual solutions such as a poster and a brochure are presented on a single display board), the work is deemed to be one final presentation. In these circumstances students will be unable to gain a ‘Very High’, ‘High’ or ‘Medium’ on each of Criteria 6, 7 and 8. Where work is submitted as two separate presentations but employing the same presentation format, for example two A3 posters or two package designs, only one visual communication presentation can be assessed. In these circumstances students will be unable to gain a ‘Very High’, ‘High’ or ‘Medium’ on each of Criteria 6, 7 and 8.

Any work labelled ‘Final Presentation’ but submitted as part of the developmental folio completed for Unit 3 Outcome 3 and Unit 4 Outcome 1, for example glued into a book, or placed in plastic pockets, or submitted as part of a loose collection of sheets, will be considered to be part of the development work. Such work will not be assessed under Criteria 6, 7 and 8.


Assessment criteriaThe extent to which the Design Folio demonstrates:

The Brief

Criterion 1

Development of a brief that defines the communication needs of a client.

Very High

Comprehensive and relevant information is provided in a brief that identifies the client with a clear and thorough description of the two communication needs. Use of highly appropriate terminology to define audience characteristics, the purpose of each communication need, the contexts in which the proposed visual communications are going to be used and the constraints and expectations for the two final presentations.

High

Detailed information is provided in a brief that identifies the client with a clear description of the two communication needs. Use of appropriate terminology to define audience characteristics, the purpose of each communication need, the contexts in which the proposed visual communications are going to be used and constraints and expectations for the two final presentations.

Medium

Adequate information is provided in a brief that identifies the client with a satisfactory description of the two communication needs. Use of some appropriate terminology to define audience characteristics, the purpose of each communication need, the contexts in which the proposed visual communications are going to be used and constraints and expectations for the two final presentations.

Low

The brief offers some information about the client with a brief description of the communication needs. Limited references to audience characteristics, the contexts in which the proposed visual communications are going to be used and expectations for one or both final presentations.

Very Low

Very little information is provided about the client with a very limited description of the communication needs. Very limited references are made to audience characteristics, the contexts in which the proposed visual communications are going to be used and expectations for one or both final presentations.

Developmental work

Criterion 2Use of observational and visualisation drawings with annotations to generate ideas relevant to the brief.

Very High

Comprehensive and highly effective use of observation and visualisation drawings in response to thorough research undertaken in preparation for the two final visual communication presentations. Highly effective drawings establish a broad range of directions appropriate to methods that comprehensively address the client’s stated needs. Insightful annotations document a range of innovative and diverse ideas that focus and direct further exploration to resolve communication needs.

High

Effective use of observation and visualisation drawings in response to detailed research undertaken in the preparation for the two final visual communication presentations. Effective drawings establish a range of directions appropriate to methods that clearly address the client’s stated needs. Informative annotations document a range of innovative ideas to focus and direct further exploration to resolve communication needs.


Medium

Appropriate use of observation and visualisation drawings in response to satisfactory research undertaken in the preparation for the two final visual communication presentations. Drawings establish a direction appropriate to methods that adequately address the client’s stated needs. Clear annotations document a range of ideas to focus and direct further exploration to resolve communication needs.

Low

Some use of observational and visualisation drawings in response to research undertaken in preparation for the two final visual communication presentations. Drawings present a direction appropriate to methods that address some aspects of the client needs. Some annotations document ideas to focus and direct further exploration to resolve communication needs. There may be evidence of traced and/or copied imagery with limited development or innovation.

Very Low

Very little use of observational and visualisation drawings in response to limited and/or unfocused research undertaken in relation to the two final visual communication presentations. Drawings offer limited direction to methods that address the client needs. Limited annotations document few ideas to focus and/or direct further exploration to resolve communication needs. There may be significant evidence of traced and/or copied imagery with very limited development.

Criterion 3Use of the design process and design thinking to generate, develop and refine a range of annotated design concepts relevant to the brief.

Very High

Comprehensive evidence demonstrating understanding of the design process, which presents separate and distinctly different design processes for the two final visual communication presentations. Thorough and highly effective exploration demonstrated through diverse approaches for innovative possible resolutions to address design concepts. A range of creative, critical and reflective thinking strategies is clearly evident. Thoughtful and considered decisions are demonstrated, through the use of appropriate terminology in coherent annotations throughout the generation, development and refinement stages of the design process, to record ongoing evaluation and the effective resolution of design issues for the two final presentations.

High

Detailed evidence demonstrating understanding of the design process, which presents separate and distinctly different design processes for the two final presentations. Effective exploration demonstrated through a range of approaches for innovative possible resolutions to address design concepts. A range of creative, critical and reflective thinking strategies is evident. Considered decisions are demonstrated, through the use of appropriate terminology in annotations throughout the generation, development and refinement stages of the design process, to record ongoing evaluation and the effective resolution of design issues for the two final presentations.

Medium

Appropriate evidence demonstrating understanding of the design process, which presents separate and different design processes for the two final presentations. Satisfactory exploration demonstrated through a range of approaches for possible resolutions to address design concepts. Creative, critical and reflective thinking strategies have been applied to some extent. Appropriate terminology in annotations demonstrates decisions within the generation, development and refinement stages of the design process to record ongoing reflection and to resolve design issues for the final presentations.

Low

Limited evidence of the use of separate design processes for each of the two final presentations. Evidence of approaches for possible resolutions to design concepts may be provided for one or both final presentations. Creative, critical and/or reflective thinking strategies have been applied to a limited extent. Limited appropriate terminology in annotations demonstrates decisions within the generation, development and/or refinement stages of the design process, to record ongoing reflection for the final presentations. Limited evidence of the resolution of design issues is not always clearly presented and there is a lack of consistency between the brief and the final presentations.


Very Low

Very limited evidence of the use of separate design processes for each of the two final presentations and the resolution of design issues for each of the presentations. Limited range of approaches for possible resolutions to design concepts for each of the presentations. Annotations provide limited evidence of appropriate terminology and/or decisions made at the generation, development and/or refinement stages of the design process, to record ongoing reflection for each of the two presentations.

Criterion 4Use of a range of materials, methods and media to develop and refine design solutions.

Very High

Highly perceptive use of materials, methods and media convey a very clear communication message in the development and refinement stages of the design process for the two final visual communication presentations. Highly effective choices are made at these stages through experimentation with different media and related materials for possible solutions. Both two-dimensional and three-dimensional manual and digital applications are used in a highly expressive and creative way and demonstrate a high level of technical expertise relative to materials, methods and media used in the development and refinement of possible design solutions appropriate to the communication needs.

High

Perceptive use of materials, methods and media convey a clear communication message in the development and refinement stages of the design process for the two final visual communication presentations. Effective choices are made at these stages through experimentation with different media and related materials for possible solutions. Both two-dimensional and three-dimensional manual and digital applications are used creatively and/or expressively and demonstrate a competent level of technical expertise relative to materials, methods and media used in the development and refinement of possible design solutions appropriate to the communication needs.

Medium

Appropriate evidence of the creative use of materials, methods and/or media to convey a communication message in the development and/or refinement stages of the design process for the two final presentations. Choices are made at these stages through experimentation with different media and possible materials appropriate to the methods and/or ideas for possible solutions. The materials, methods and/or media used in the development and/or refinement of possible design solutions appropriate to the communication needs involve creative or expressive use of both two-dimensional and three-dimensional manual and digital applications that may reveal limited technical expertise in application.

Low

Some use of materials, methods and / or media to convey a communication message in the development and/or refinement stages of the design process for the two final presentations. Limited evidence of choices made at these stages through experimentation with media and/or possible materials appropriate to the method/s and/or ideas for possible solutions. The materials, methods and/or media used in the development and/or refinement of possible design solutions appropriate to the communication needs involve limited creativity and/or expressive use of both two-dimensional and three-dimensional manual and digital applications and limited technical expertise in their application. Technical inaccuracies may be evident.

Very Low

Media, materials and/or method/s are used in a very limited way in the development and/or refinement stages of the design process. Evidence of limited technical accuracy for the two final presentations. Very little evidence of experimentation with media and/or possible materials appropriate to the selected method/s and/or proposed ideas for possible solutions. Very limited evidence is provided of the use of two-dimensional and/or three-dimensional manual and digital applications relative to selected materials, method/s and/or media to develop and/or refine possible design solutions as appropriate to the communication needs.


Criterion 5Use of a range of design elements and design principles to develop and refine design concepts.

Very High

Very clear understanding of aesthetic factors evident in the development of a diverse range of design concepts that are refined through the use of mock-ups for preferred design options. Accomplished use of design elements and principles support innovative ideas for highly effective communication in the two final visual presentations.

High

Clear understanding of aesthetic factors evident in the development of a range of design concepts that are refined through the use of mock-ups for preferred design options. Skilful use of design elements and design principles to develop a range of innovative ideas for effective communication in the two final visual communication presentations.

Medium

Adequate understanding of aesthetic factors in the development and refinement of a range of design concepts that are refined through the use of mock-ups for preferred design options. Appropriate use of design elements and principles to develop a range of ideas for clear communication in the two final visual communication presentations.

Low

Limited understanding of aesthetic factors in the development and refinement of a limited range of design concepts. Little refinement of design concepts through the use of mock-ups for preferred options Limited use of design elements and principles for one or both of the two final presentations.

Very Low

Very limited understanding of aesthetic factors in the development and refinement of design concepts. Very little development of design concepts or the use of mock-ups. Very limited use of design elements and/or principles for one or both of the two final presentations.

Final presentations

Criterion 6Production of two final visual communication presentations which demonstrate effective visual communication appropriate to the brief.

Very High

Production of two highly effective final visual communication presentations with reference to the characteristics, purposes, intended contexts, constraints and expectations of the audience/s as outlined in the brief. A highly effective relationship is evident between the final visual communication solutions and the chosen presentation formats.

High

Production of two effective final visual communication presentations with reference to the characteristics, purposes, intended contexts, constraints and expectations of the audience/s as outlined in the brief. An effective relationship is evident between the final visual communication solutions and the chosen presentation formats.

Medium

Production of two competent final presentations with clear links to the characteristics, purposes, intended contexts, constraints and expectations of the audience/s as outlined in the brief. An appropriate relationship is evident between the final visual communication solutions and the chosen presentation formats.

Low

Production of final presentation/s with some links to some of the characteristics, purposes, contexts, constraints and expectations of the audience/s as outlined in the brief. Final presentation/s may not be consistent with the communication needs described in the brief. Some consideration is evident of the relationship between the final visual communication solutions and the chosen presentation formats.


Very Low

Production of two final presentation/s with very limited links to the brief. Final presentation/s may not be consistent with the communication needs described in the brief. A very limited understanding and/or consideration of the relationship between the final visual communication solutions and the chosen presentation formats.

Criterion 7Production of two final visual communication presentations which demonstrate thoughtful decisions and imagination.

Very High

Highly imaginative and expressive use of materials, methods and media to produce two final presentations that meet the client’s communication needs. Considered selection and application of design elements and design principles to convey a clear communication message for the targeted audience/s.

High

Imaginative use of materials, methods and media to produce two final presentations that meet the client’s communication needs. Informed selection and application of design elements and design principles to convey a communication message appropriate for the targeted audience/s.

Medium

Thoughtful use of materials, methods and media to produce two final presentations that meet the client’s communication needs. Satisfactory selection and application of design elements and design principles convey a communication message appropriate for the targeted audience/s.

Low

Some use of materials, methods and media to produce one or two final presentations that meet the client’s communication needs. Limited selection and/or application of design elements and design principles to convey a communication message for the targeted audience/s of one or two final presentations. Final presentation/s may not be fully consistent with the communication needs described in the brief.

Very Low

Very limited use of materials, methods and media to produce one or two final presentations. Very limited selection and/or application of design elements and design principles to convey a communication message for the targeted audience/s. Final presentation/s may not be consistent with the communication needs described in the brief.

Criterion 8Production of two final visual communication presentations which demonstrate technical competence.

Very High

Highly competent level of technical expertise, selection and application of materials, methods and media in the production of two final presentations. Technical detail precisely communicates ideas and/or intentions and is supported by effective text and highly suitable visual imagery. Effective strategies are used to accurately represent form, function and conventions in the production of final presentations.

High

Competent level of technical expertise, selection and application of materials, methods and media in the production of two final presentations. Technical detail clearly communicates ideas and/or intentions and is well supported by text and suitable visual imagery. Clear strategies are used to accurately represent form, function and conventions in the production of final presentations.

Medium

Satisfactory level of technical understanding, selection and application of materials, methods and media in the production of two final presentations. The accuracy of technical detail and communication of ideas and/or intentions with text and visual imagery is adequate. Appropriate strategies are generally used to represent form, function and conventions in the production of final presentations.


Low

Limited technical skill in the application and production of one or two final presentations appropriate to the selected materials, methods and media. Limited use of strategies to represent form and function in the production of final presentation/s. Limited accuracy and clarity in technical detail and communication of ideas and/or intentions with text and visual imagery in one and/or both of the final presentations.

Very Low

Very limited skill and use of applications relative to materials, methods and media in the production of one or two final presentations. Limited understanding of how to represent form and function in the production of final presentation/s. Very little information and technical detail in one or both final presentations. Very limited clarity in the communication of ideas and/or intentions. The final presentation/s may not be consistent with the communication needs described in the brief.


Vict

oria

n Ce

rtific

ate

of E

duca

tion

Visu

al C

omm

unic

atio

n De

sign

Ass

essm

ent S

heet

Scho

ol-a

sses

sed

Task

: Des

ign

folio P

erfo

rman

ce o

n cr

iteria

: Tea

cher

’s c

omm

ents

You

may

wish

to co

mm

ent o

n as

pects

of t

he st

uden

t’s w

ork

that

led to

you

r as

sess

men

t of V

ery

High

, Hig

h, M

ediu

m, L

ow, V

ery

Low

or N

ot S

hown

for s

pecifi

c cr

iteria

.

2013

stud

ent n

umbe

r

asse

ssin

g sc

hool

num

ber

Adv

ice

to te

ache

rsTh

is as

sess

men

t she

et wi

ll as

sist t

each

ers t

o de

term

ine t

heir

scor

e for

each

stud

ent.

Ther

e are

two

stage

s to

this

proc

ess.

The fi

rst st

age i

s to

mak

e jud

gmen

ts on

the s

tude

nt’s

perfo

rman

ce o

n ea

ch cr

iterio

n fo

r the

task

pub

lishe

d by

the V

ictor

ian C

urric

ulum

and A

sses

smen

t Aut

horit

y fo

r thi

s Sch

ool-a

sses

sed T

ask.

You

sh

ould

tick

Ver

y Hi

gh, H

igh,

Med

ium

, Low

, Ver

y Lo

w or

Not

Sho

wn to

indi

cate

how

the s

tude

nt p

erfo

rmed

on

each

crite

rion,

and

com

men

t, wh

ere a

ppro

priat

e, on

you

r ass

essm

ent o

f the

stud

ent’s

per

form

ance

. The

seco

nd st

age i

s to

calcu

late t

he su

btot

als an

d to

tal sc

ore u

sing V

ery

High

= 5

, Hig

h =

4, M

ediu

m =

3,

Low

= 2,

Ver

y Lo

w =

1, N

ot S

hown

= 0

. You

shou

ld re

fer t

o th

e ‘Ke

y to

Gra

de A

lloca

tion’

to d

eterm

ine t

he ap

prop

riate

grad

e and

reco

rd th

e gra

de in

the b

ox

(bot

tom

righ

t-han

d co

rner

).

Crit

eria

for

the

awar

d of

gra

des

Ve

ry

Ve

ry

Not

Hi

gh

High

M

ed

Low

Low

Show

n

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

(0)

The

exte

nt to

whi

ch th

e De

sign

folio

dem

onst

rate

s:

The

brie

f

1 de

velo

pmen

t of a

brie

f tha

t defi

nes

the

com

mun

icat

ion

need

/s

of a

clie

nt

Dev

elop

men

tal w

ork

2 us

e of

obs

erva

tiona

l and

vis

ualis

atio

n dr

awin

gs w

ith a

nnot

atio

ns

to g

ener

ate

idea

s re

leva

nt to

the

brie

f

3 us

e of

the

desi

gn p

roce

ss a

nd d

esig

n th

inki

ng to

gen

erat

e, d

evel

op a

nd

refin

e a

rang

e of

ann

otat

ed d

esig

n co

ncep

ts re

leva

nt to

the

brie

f

4 us

e of

a ra

nge

of m

ater

ials

, met

hods

and

med

ia to

dev

elop

and

refin

e de

sign

sol

utio

ns

5 us

e of

a ra

nge

of d

esig

n el

emen

ts a

nd d

esig

n pr

inci

ples

to d

evel

op a

nd

refin

e de

sign

con

cept

s

Fina

l pre

sent

atio

ns

6 pr

oduc

tion

of tw

o fin

al v

isua

l com

mun

icat

ion

pres

enta

tions

whi

ch

dem

onst

rate

effe

ctiv

e vi

sual

com

mun

icat

ion

appr

opria

te to

the

brie

f

7 pr

oduc

tion

of tw

o fin

al v

isua

l com

mun

icat

ion

pres

enta

tions

whi

ch

dem

onst

rate

thou

ghtfu

l dec

isio

ns a

nd im

agin

atio

n

8 pr

oduc

tion

of tw

o fin

al v

isua

l com

mun

icat

ion

pres

enta

tions

whi

ch

dem

onst

rate

tech

nica

l com

pete

nce

TOTA

L SC

ORE

If a

stud

ent d

oes

not s

ubm

it th

e Sc

hool

-ass

esse

d Ta

sk a

t all,

N/

A sh

ould

be

ente

red

in th

e to

tal s

core

box

SUBT

OTAL

S


Authentication Record FormVCE Visual Communication Design School-assessed Task

Please print clearly.This form must be completed by the class teacher. It provides a record of the monitoring of students’ work in progress for authentication purposes.

Student name ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Student number

Teacher’s name ...................................................................................................................................... Class .....................................................................

Component of School-assessed Task Date observed/submitted

Authentication issues/comments Teacher’s initials

Student’s initials

The Brief1. Acceptance of topic

2. Preparation of one brief, signed and dated by teacher

3. Design Process #1Observation of work in class

– Handwritten or typed student annotations

– All source material acknowledged

4. Observation of work in class – Teacher provides written comments

to student on progress

Design Process #25. Observation of work in class

– Handwritten or typed student annotations

– All source material acknowledged

Preparation of two separate and discernibly different presentations6. Observation of work in class

Final submission of task

I declare that all resource materials and assistance used have been acknowledged and that all unacknowledged work is my own.

Student signature ................................................................................................................................................................ Date ............................................

This sheet is to be retained by the school, sighted by the principal, and filed (see Section 10.1.2 of the VCE and VCAL Administrative Handbook 2013). It should be produced if requested by the VCAA.This form may be collected by the VCAA as part of the School-assessment audit and review program.

design folio assessment criteria

Documents

Transcript of design folio assessment criteria