Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design...

113
Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of Inactive NABORS Landfill Mountain Home, Arkansas Presented to: Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, Arkansas 72118 Presented by: SCS AQUATERRA 7311 West 130th Street, Suite 100 Overland Park, Kansas 66213 (913) 681-0030 April 2015 File No. 27214218.01 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com

Transcript of Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design...

Page 1: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Des ign Cr i te r ia Repor t

Des ign P rofess ional Se rv ices C losu re o f I nac t i ve NABORS Landf i l l

Moun ta in Home , Arkansas

Presented to:

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality

5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, Arkansas 72118

Presented by:

S C S A Q U A T E R R A 7311 West 130th Street, Suite 100

Overland Park, Kansas 66213 (913) 681-0030

April 2015 File No. 27214218.01

Offices Nationwide

www.scsengineers.com

Page 2: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t D e s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s

C l o s u r e o f I n a c t i v e N A B O R S L a n d f i l l

Presented To:

A r k a n s a s D e p a r t m e n t o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y 5301 Northshore Drive

North Little Rock, Arkansas 72118

Presented By:

S C S A Q U A T E R R A 7311 West 130th Street, Suite 100

Overland Park, Kansas 66213 (913) 681-0030

April 2015 File No. 27214218.01

Page 3: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s Section Page

1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Site Description ................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Site Background ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Permits and Approved Documents ............................................................................................ 2

3.0 Site Assessment................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Site Inspection ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Access Control ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Volumetric Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 4

3.3.1 Currently-Permitted Final Grades ...................................................................... 5 3.4 Historical Borrow Soil Investigation .......................................................................................... 5

3.4.1 Historical Soil Data Sources ................................................................................. 5 3.4.2 Soil Data Evaluation Summary ............................................................................ 6 3.4.3 Estimated Soil Volumes Required ........................................................................ 7 3.4.4 Further Soil Investigations ..................................................................................... 7

4.0 Design .............................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Access Control ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Final Cover Design ....................................................................................................................... 8

4.2.1 Class 1 Disposal Units............................................................................................ 8 4.2.2 Class 4 Final Cover System ............................................................................... 10 4.2.3 Class 1 Alternative Final Cover System .......................................................... 11 4.2.4 GCL Equivalency ................................................................................................. 12

5.0 Gas System Design ........................................................................................................ 17 5.1 Passive Ventilation System ...................................................................................................... 17 5.2 Active Gas Collection System ................................................................................................. 18

6.0 Leachate Disposal .......................................................................................................... 20 6.1 Leachate Disposal Devices ...................................................................................................... 20

6.1.1 Leachate Evaporator .......................................................................................... 20 6.1.2 Deep Well Injection ............................................................................................ 21 6.1.3 Artificial Wetland Leachate Treatment .......................................................... 22 6.1.4 Leachate Recirculation/Injection into the Waste ........................................... 22 6.1.5 Leachate Ponds.................................................................................................... 23 6.1.6 Centralized Leachate Tank Farm and Forcemain ......................................... 23

6.2 Potential Leachate Disposal Options..................................................................................... 23

7.0 Develop Closure/Post-Closure Plan ............................................................................... 26 7.1 Closure Plan Requirements ...................................................................................................... 26 7.2 Post Closure Care Plan ............................................................................................................ 28

i

Page 4: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

List of Appendices Appendix A

Site Inspection Notes

Appendix B Historical Soil Data Tables and Proposed Boring Locations Appendix C GCL Equivalency Technical Paper Appendix D Conceptual GCCS and Leachate Collection Layout Appendix E LandGEM Models

i i

Page 5: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

1 . 0 INTRODUCT ION

The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) has contracted with SCS Aquaterra (SCS) to provide design professional services for the closure of the inactive NABORS Landfill. The design criteria presented herein will be the footprint for the closure of the landfill and related tasks. The purpose of this report is to reach consensus with the ADEQ on closure activities in order to facilitate a successful closure within the time constraints specified by the ADEQ. The following project-specific design considerations were identified prior to preparation of this Design Criteria Report:

Closure of Class 1 (Area 1-2, Area 1-3) and Class 4 disposal units Address existing groundwater contamination Gas collection and control system installation Centralized leachate disposal system Un-vegetated borrow area grading and revegetation Borrow area investigation Final grade revisions

The recommendations provided in this Design Criteria Report were developed based on two main factors, feasibility and cost.

1

Page 6: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

2 . 0 S I T E DESCR IP T ION

2 . 1 S I T E B A C K GR OU N D

The NABORS Landfill is located near Mountain Home, Arkansas in Baxter County. The NABORS Facility is located on portions of the NE ¼ of the NW ¼ and portions of the NW ¼ of the NE ¼ of Section 35, T-21-N, R-14-W. The Class 4 landfill has a waste fill area of approximately 5.75 acres. The Class 4 Landfill operates under ADEQ permit number 0249-S4, AFIN 03-00051 which became effective September 12, 1997. The Permit had an Administrative Permit Change November 27, 2007 which modified the permit to remove the expiration date. The Class 1 landfill has a permitted disposal area of approximately 56 acres and operates under ADEQ permit number 0249-S1-R2, AFIN 03-00051.

The Class 4 was permitted to receive non-hazardous, bulky, inert, non-putrescible solid wastes that do not degrade, or degrade very slowly and are permitted by the ADEQ. These wastes include construction and demolition wastes, appliances, furniture, stumps, limbs, and other bulky wastes that are not normally collected with other household, commercial or industrial waste.

2 . 2 P ER M I TS A ND A P P R OV ED D OC U M E N TS

The closure design will be based upon the following permits and the associated approved documents:

Permit Number 0249-S1-R2

Document Title ADEQ Document ID No. Bottom Grading Plan – Zone 15 (Area 1-2) 28209 Final Cover Grading Plan – Area 1-2 28209 Stormwater Control Plan – Area 1-2 28209 Liner and Final Cover System Details – Area 1-2 28209 Bottom Liner System and Related Details – Zone 14 (Area 1-2) 20978 Subgrade Grading Plan – Area 1-3 34683 Grading Plan – Top of Compacted Clay Liner – Area 1-3 34683 Final Grading Plan – Area 1-3 34683 Stormwater Control Plan – Area 1-3 34683 Passive Gas Control Plan – Area 1-3 34683 Liner Details – Area 1-3 34888 Leachate Collection System Details – Area 1-3 34888 and 34683 Final Cover System Details – Area 1-3 34683 Stormwater Control Details – Area 1-3 34888 Bottom Grading Plan (Drawing 4) 56139 Cross Sections 3A and 3B (Drawings 5 and 7) 56139 Cell 3B and East Ditch Profile (Drawing 6) 56139 Liner Details Sheet (Drawing 9) 56139

2

Page 7: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Leachate Collection System Detail (Drawing 9) 56139 Area 1-3 Typical Liner Connection Detail 57594 Clay Liner Grading Plan (Drawing 3) 59707 Drainage Flow Paths (Drawing 4) 59707 Construction Details (Drawings 5 and 6) 59707 Final Cover Grading Plan (Drawing 3) 61223 Area 1-2 Closure (Drawing 4) 61223 Profiles 61223 Final Cover Details 61737 Closure and Post-Closure Plan 61223 CQA Plan 61737

Permit Number 0249-S4

Document Title ADEQ Document ID No. Permitted Limits 58185 Permitted Final Contours 58185

3

Page 8: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

3 . 0 S I T E ASSESSMENT

3 . 1 S I T E I NS P EC T I ON

SCS personnel performed an initial site inspection on December 16, 2014. The inspection was performed to identify potential obstacles that may affect the design and construction of the landfill closure including the following:

Leachate seeps; Existing leachate collection systems; Site access roads; Access control; and Site drainage features.

Meeting notes taken during the site inspection are presented as Appendix A.

3 . 2 A C C ES S C ON TR O L

Currently, the site is secured by a gate located on the west side of the landfill at the site entrance. Fencing is not continuous around the perimeter of the landfill. In accordance with Arkansas Regulation 22.417 – Access Requirements, the site must be adequately fenced with an entrance gate that can be locked.

In an effort to reduce costs, SCS recommends installing a perimeter fence around the disposal units with the gate being moved further east, down the current access road, to reduce the acreage being secured. Furthermore, the ADEQ has indicated that land outside of the disposal units may change ownership in the future. This potential circumstance will be taken into consideration when laying out the fence path. Design of the fence will be finalized after the other major components of the closure are design (final cover, gas system, leachate disposal devices).

3 . 3 V OLU M E TR I C A NA LY S I S

Volumetric analyses were performed by comparing existing topography to permitted top of waste contours for the Area 1-2, Area 1-3, and Class 4 disposal units. Existing topography was surveyed by Consolidated Land Services, Inc in December 2014. The volumes were calculated by developing electronic three-dimensional models of the disposal units based on the aforementioned topographic survey and currently-permitted final cover contours. These models and subsequent calculations were performed using the Autodesk® AutoCAD Civil 3D 2014 software.

4

Page 9: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

3 . 3 . 1 C u r r e n t l y - P e r m i t t e d F i n a l G r a d e s

The existing Class 4 topography was compared to the top of waste surface which is based on the currently permitted final cover contours and lowered three feet to account for the thickness of the final cover system.

Table 1 - Summary of Class 4 Volumetric Analysis

Area 1-2 Area 1-3 Class 4

Cut (CY) 88,500 160,600 43,000

Fill (CY) 68,000 130,000 41,000

Net (CY) -20,500 -30,600 -2,000

Based on the volumes presented in Table 1, Area 1-2, Area 1-3, and Class 4 contain overfill.

3 . 4 H I S T OR I C A L B OR R OW S O I L I NV E S T I G A T I O N

SCS performed a historical borrow soil investigation in an effort to identify onsite soil that may be suitable for use in the construction of the final cover system. The investigation consisted of reviewing and compiling pertinent information from historical soil investigations, boring logs, geotechnical reports, and testing data from previous cell construction. This section discusses the background of the data compiled and summarizes relevant soil characteristics.

3 . 4 . 1 H i s t o r i c a l S o i l D a t a S o u r c e s

Geotechnical and Hydrogeologic Reports In 1987, Grubbs, Garner and Hoskyn, Inc. performed a geotechnical and hydrogeologic study on the area of the proposed RLH Sanitary Landfill Number 3 (RLH Landfill). The RLH Landfill later became the NABORS Landfill. The primary purpose of this study was to define the hydrogeologic setting of the site, assess the feasibility of landfill development at the site, and to prepare engineering recommendations. During the study, numerous soil borings were completed and sampled around the site.

Construction Quality Assurance Testing Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) was completed by various companies for the low permeability soil liner construction component of Areas 1-2 and 1-3. These companies completed soil testing to evaluate if the soil met the CQA Plan’s minimum requirements. Soil characteristics tested for included soil classification, standard proctor, Atterberg limits, sieve analyses, moisture content, and permeability.

5

Page 10: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

3 . 4 . 2 S o i l D a t a E v a l u a t i o n S u m m a r y

Estimated Soil Quantity SCS evaluated elevation data from 57 borings from the 1987 geotechnical and hydrogeologic study and identified approximate top and bottom elevations of a soil layer. Triangulated irregular network (TIN) surfaces were created for the estimated top and bottom soil horizons in order to estimate soil quantities. Although preliminary, these surfaces assisted in identifying ideal borrow sources and estimating available borrow soil quantities. Figure 1 illustrates the proposed borrow soil location with the estimated soil horizon thickness.

Figure 1 - Estimated Borrow Soil Quantity

Soil Characterization Additional soil data was compiled for 37 of the 52 borings used for onsite soil quantification. The 37 borings were selected because they were performed within the current property boundary. The property boundary has changed since the geotechnical and hydrogeologic study was performed in 1987.

Soil data was also compiled from previous cell construction provided a representation of the onsite soil properties, as well as, an indication of the level of effort required to construct low permeability soil layers. In general, significant compaction effort and moisture conditioning were needed to meet the CQA plan’s requirements.

6

Page 11: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

A summary of the compiled soil data is presented as Appendix B.

3 . 4 . 3 E s t i m a t e d S o i l V o l u m e s R e q u i r e d

The amount of available soil affects the feasibility of each of the closure options. Table 2 summarizes the estimated quantities required for each final cover system.

Table 2 - Estimated Soil Volumes Required

Area 1-2 Area 1-3 Class 4 Alternative Final Cover (Area 1-2

only)

Alternative Final Cover (Area 1-3

only)

Low Permeability Soil (CY) 55,800 44,100 16,500 0 0

Protective Soil (CY) 37,200 29,400 0 55,800 44,100

Vegetative Soil (CY) 18,600 14,700 5,500 18,600 14,700

Total Soil Required (CY) 111,600 88,200 22,000 74,400 58,800

3 . 4 . 4 F u r t h e r S o i l I n v e s t i g a t i o n s

SCS proposes doing further soil investigation in order to evaluate current conditions and identify potential inconsistencies with the historical data. Soil samples will be collected for geotechnical property testing and soil horizon depths recorded. Figure 1 presented in Appendix B illustrates the 14 proposed sampling locations. These points are focused in and around the proposed borrow area. This data will be used to evaluate the quantity and quality of the soil within the proposed borrow area.

Soil samples will be sent to a lab to have the following tests completed: Atterberg limits, particle size analysis, moisture content, and in place permeability. In addition to these tests, the soil will be tested for calcium carbonate. In the historic soil data, a note was made that calcareous nodules were found. Calcareous soil contains calcium carbonate and other carbonates. Standard Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) does not perform well in calcareous soils due to the ion exchange between the soil and the GCL. There are variations that of GCL that do perform well in calcareous soils, but the cost maybe higher. If the percent of calcium carbonate is lower than the percentage that the manufacturer recommends standard GCL can be used.

7

Page 12: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

4 . 0 DES IGN

4 . 1 A C C ES S C ON TR O L

In accordance with Arkansas Regulation 22.417 – Access Requirements, solid waste disposal units should be fenced to prevent unauthorized public access. After initial site visits to the Landfill, it appears that the current fencing is not sufficient to meet this regulation. SCS Aquaterra will develop a plan to fence the entire disposal area that will be in compliance with this regulation.

Additionally, the ADEQ has indicated that it may be necessary to fence the disposal areas in case the remaining land is purchased by others.

4 . 2 F I NA L C OV ER D E S I GN

SCS Aquaterra previously prepared a letter outlining potential final cover systems that may be appropriate for the NABORS Landfill. The options proposed in this letter covered a wide range of options that produce its own set of advantages and disadvantages.

Volumetric analyses were performed by comparing existing topography to permitted top of waste contours for the Area 1-2, Area 1-3, and Class 4 disposal units. Existing topographic surveying was performed by Consolidated Land Services, Inc in December 2014. The volumes were calculated by developing electronic three-dimensional models of the disposal units based on the aforementioned topographic survey and currently-permitted final cover contours. These models and subsequent calculations were performed using the Autodesk® AutoCAD Civil 3D 2014 software.

4 . 2 . 1 C l a s s 1 D i s p o s a l U n i t s

Area 1-2 The Area 1-2 disposal units are currently permitted for a final cover system consisting of the following components and as illustrated in Figure 2:

6” vegetative soil layer 12” protective cover soil layer 8 oz needle punched non-woven geotextile fabric 12” gravel drainage layer 40-mil textured LLDPE geomembrane 18” compacted soil layer (1 x 10-7 cm/sec)

8

Page 13: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Figure 2 - Permitted Area 1-2 Final Cover System

Area 1-3 The Area 1-3 disposal units are currently permitted for a final cover system consisting of the following components and as illustrated in Figure 3:

6” vegetative soil layer 12” protective cover soil layer Geocomposite drainage layer 40-mil textured LLDPE geomembrane 18” compacted soil layer (1 x 10-7 cm/sec)

9

Page 14: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Figure 3 - Permitted Area 1-3 Final Cover System

4 . 2 . 2 C l a s s 4 F i n a l C o v e r S y s t e m

The currently-permitted Class 4 final cover system (from top to bottom) is described below and shown on Figure 4:

6” thick vegetative layer 18” compacted soil layer (1 x 10-7 cm/sec)

1 0

Page 15: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Figure 4 - Permitted Class 4 Final Cover System

4 . 2 . 3 C l a s s 1 A l t e r n a t i v e F i n a l C o v e r S y s t e m

The proposed Class 1 alternative final cover system (from top to bottom) is described below and shown on Figure 5:

6” thick vegetative layer 12” thick erosion layer Geocomposite drainage net (GDN) 40 mil thick textured LLDPE geomembrane Geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) 6” clean soil layer Interim Cover

1 1

Page 16: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Figure 5 – Class 1 Alternative Final Cover System

4 . 2 . 4 G C L E q u i v a l e n c y

The incorporation of GCLs into composite landfill liner and final cover systems has become a common practice in the United States, especially for sites that have poor onsite soils for low permeability layer construction. Numerous evaluations and demonstrations have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of GCLs in place of a low permeability soil layer. The technical paper, entitled Technical Equivalency Assessment of GCLs to CCLs (R.M. Koerner and D.D. Daniel, 1993), details the performance of a GCL versus a traditional compacted clay liner (CCL) with respect to hydraulic properties, physical/mechanical properties, and construction issues. The following sections summarize the findings presented in the aforementioned technical paper as it relates to the proposed final cover system for the NABORS Landfill.

Hydraulic Properties

In relation to final cover applications, the following hydraulic properties of GCLs were compared to those of a CCL:

Steady flux of water Steady solute flux Chemical adsorption capacity Breakout time

1 2

Page 17: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Horizontal flow in seams or lifts Horizontal flow beneath geomembranes Generation of consolidation water Permeability to gases

Hydraulic Conductivity Koerner and Daniel estimated the required hydraulic conductivity required for a GCL to be equivalent to a CCL using the following equation:

𝑘𝑘𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺,𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = 𝑘𝑘𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺 �𝑇𝑇𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝑇𝑇𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺

� �𝐻𝐻 + 𝑇𝑇𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐻𝐻 + 𝑇𝑇𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺

Where, 𝑘𝑘 = hydraulic conductivity (1x10-7 cm/sec for CCL) 𝑇𝑇 = thickness (7 mm for GCL, 450 mm for CCL) 𝐻𝐻 = head of water on GCL (10 mm, thickness of geocomposite)

The required hydraulic conductivity of a 7 mm-thick GCL to be equivalent to an 18-inch CCL is 4.2x10-8 cm/sec. Manufactured hydraulic conductivity of a typical GCL is approximately 5.0x10-9 cm/sec. Previous equivalency evaluations specified a head of water of 12 inches. This value is appropriate when evaluating liner systems but is not realistic for final covers. The thickness of 10 mm was used to represent a scenario where the geocomposite drainage net was fully submerged.

Chemical Adsorption The technical paper suggests that a GCL is as effective or superior than a CCL for each of these properties except chemical adsorption capacity. Chemical adsorption capacity is not concerning since the GCL is proposed for final cover application and will not likely be in contact with leachate. Calcareous soils, however, can promote ion exchange reactions between the soil and sodium bentonite component of a GCL, which can potentially increase permeability. Further borrow soil evaluation will be performed as part of the borrow soil investigation to evaluate and quantify the presence of calcareous soils. If present, screening of the soil to reduce calcium concentration and/or incorporating a chemically-resistant GCL will be performed. Additionally, GCLs have been used in the bottom liner systems in Area 1-3 in contact with onsite soils and do not appear to have been adversely affected.

Physical/Mechanical Properties

The technical paper addressed the following physical/mechanical properties as part of the evaluation:

Freeze-thaw behavior

1 3

Page 18: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Wet-dry behavior Total settlement Differential settlement Slope stability Vulnerability to erosion Bearing capacity

The physical/mechanical properties are anticipated to be equivalent or superior with the exception of bearing capacity.

Bearing Capacity Concentrated loads on the final cover can cause lateral migration of the hydrated bentonite. By incorporating layers of protection above the GCL (geomembrane, geocomposite, protective soil) and construction quality assurance (CQA) during construction, the potential for this phenomenon will be reduced.

Construction Issues

The technical paper discussed the following construction issues as part of the evaluation:

Puncture resistance Subgrade condition Ease of placement Speed of construction Availability of materials Requirements of water Air pollution concerns Weather constraints Quality assurance considerations

Koerner and Daniel indicate that the GCL is equivalent or superior for these issues with the exception of puncture resistance and subgrade condition. The construction issues related to GCL installation can be alleviated with the proper CQA. Product-specific information will be included in project specifications and the CQA Plan to outline the appropriate methods and level of caution necessary during construction. Similar to subgrade preparation for the geomembrane, the following steps should be performed as part of the GCL deployment:

Interim cover must be at least 12” thick; 6” of clean soil to be placed on top of the intermediate cover (clean soil to be screened to

remove larger particles as specified by manufacturer);

1 4

Page 19: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Nuclear moisture/density testing of the 6” clean soil lift to be performed to verify soil is +/-4% Optimum Moisture Content and 90% Maximum Dry Density (No permeability requirement); and

Smooth drum rolling of the completed subgrade prior to GCL deployment.

Table 3 summarizes the criteria evaluated and determinations made as part of the technical paper.

Table 3 - Summary of Technical Equivalency of GCLs for Final Cover Applications

Category Criteria for Evaluation GCL is

Probably Superior

GCL is Probably

Equivalent

GCL is Probably

not Equivalent

Equivalency Depends on

Site or Product

Hyd

raul

ic

Prop

ertie

s

Steady flux of water x Breakout time of water x

Horizontal flow in seams or lifts x Horizontal flow beneath geomembranes x

Generation of consolidation water x Permeability to gases x

Phys

ical

/Mec

hani

cal

Pro

pert

ies

Freeze-thaw behavior x Wet-dry behavior x Total settlement x

Differential settlement x Slope stability x

Vulnerability to erosion x Bearing capacity x

Con

stru

ctio

n Is

sues

Puncture resistance x Subgrade condition x Ease of placement x

Speed of construction x Availability of materials x Requirements for water x Air pollution concerns x Weather constraints x

Quality assurance considerations x A copy of the Technical Equivalency Assessment of GCLs to CCLs is presented as Appendix C.

Recommendation

Class 1 Disposal Units SCS recommends installing the alternative final cover option for the Class 1 disposal units. This recommendation is driven by constructability concerns related to the installation of a low permeability soil layer on top of waste. After reviewing historical cell construction testing data, it appears the soil placement zone is small when attempting to achieve a permeability of

1 5

Page 20: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

1.0x10-7 cm/sec. This is not ideal for final cover construction as the in-place waste will settle and compact further which can greatly increase the necessary compaction efforts.

The use of the alternative geosynthetic layers will not only provide an equivalent low permeability layer, but will allow for a potentially reduced construction time. The GDN and GCL layers can be placed fairly quickly compared to additional soil components. Preparation of the 6” grading layer (and underlying intermediate cover) will be performed as appropriate for geosynthetics placement including proof-rolling and removal of large particles.

Class 4 Disposal Unit SCS recommends constructing the currently permitted final cover system for the Class 4 disposal unit. Construction and demolition (C&D) waste does not exhibit the same degrading and settling characteristics as the waste found in the Class 1 disposal units. Therefore, construction of a low permeability soil layer should be achievable. SCS requests that the permeability requirement be reduced to 1x10-5 cm/sec, consistent with the Arkansas Regulation 22.

1 6

Page 21: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

5 . 0 GAS SYSTEM DES IGN

Since the NABORS Landfill has a design capacity less than 2.5 million megagrams (~2.1 million megagrams), the facility is not subject to the requirements listed in 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart WWW-Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. However, the disposal units will be receiving a final cover system, which includes a geosynthetic component, and will require pressure control to prevent the bubbling of geosynthetics or failure of the final cover. Additionally, the gas system will provide control of the site’s emissions and address gas migration that has previously been observed.

5 . 1 P A S S I V E V E NT I LA T I ON S Y S T EM

The least expensive gas control system option would be to install a passive gas venting system. This system would consist of a venting layer below the geomembrane, usually an aggregate or geocomposite, which discharges the accumulating landfill gas through a pipe that penetrates the final cover system and vents to the atmosphere. These penetration pipes are typically placed at a minimum frequency of 1 per acre. The pipe would be modified to prevent rain from falling into the pipe or from animals getting into the pipe.

Figure 6 - Typical Passive Vent Detail

1 7

Page 22: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

A passive venting system would not address the landfill gas migration that has been observed previously. This system would not provide any significant impact for either of these problems.

5 . 2 A C T I V E GA S C OL L EC T I ON S Y S T EM

An active gas collection and control system (GCCS) can reduce/prevent gas migration and associated groundwater contamination. Similar to the passive system, an active system would help prevent a final cover system failure due to over pressurization of the waste. SCS recommends that an active gas system be installed in Areas 1-2 and 1-3. The two areas will be able to share a blower and flare which will minimize construction costs. The gas collected from the landfill will reduce air emissions and could potentially produce carbon credits.

LandGEM Model Three LandGEM models will be run for Areas 1-2 and 1-3 to determine the theoretical gas generation curves. The first LandGEM model will utilize the default values for methane generation rate constant (k, yr-1) and methane generation potential, (Lo, m3 CH4/Mg refuse) as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). The model will also be run utilizing the AP-42 recommended values for k and Lo which usually produce a more realistic gas generation curve. The third model will incorporate k and Lo values developed by SCS based on actual observed LFG production at other sites. Design of the GCCS will be based on whichever set of results seems most realistic and appropriate for the site’s closure.

KY Pipe Model Based on the layout of the GCCS and expected gas generation rates, a KYPipe model will be built to analyze system headloss and size header/lateral piping. The following design criteria will be evaluated during pipe sizing:

Maximum headloss of 1-inch of water column per 100 feet of pipe; Maximum con-current velocity of 40 feet per second; and Maximum counter-current velocity of 20 feet per second.

The model will incorporate estimated flow rates throughout the system based on the linear footage of slotted pipe at each well. Using the estimated flow rates, a blower will be sized to be capable of producing 10 inches of water column vacuum for the GCCS. A variable frequency drive (VFD) should be considered if the blower will not be capable of operating at the lower flows that will be required by that landfill in the future. The VFD will allow the blower to operate more efficiently at lower rates as the gas production of the landfill declines. This system will not be designed with expansion of the GCCS in mind.

Gas Extraction Wells Vertical gas extraction wells will be utilized in the disposal units to collect landfill gas. The location, depth, and number of wells will be based upon the estimated methane generation rates,

1 8

Page 23: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

final grades of the disposal units, as-built/estimated top of bottom liner elevations, and the estimated radius of influence for each well.

In general the gas wells will rise four feet above the final cover and have at least 16 feet of solid pipe below the final cover surface. The well would be drilled to within 15’ of the bottom liner or piggyback liner, depending on the wells’ specific location, but should not exceed 100 feet in depth. The headers and laterals will be sloped to drain condensate back into the waste, where acceptable, or into condensate sumps.

Flare The placement of the flare will be strategically located to assist in leachate collection/disposal. The radiant heat from the flare also needs to be considered a hazard if being placed near heat-sensitive structures (leachate tanks, overhead electric lines, etc.).

Blower System A skid mounted blower, VFD, control panel, and flow recorders can be utilized to reduce cost by allowing all of these components to be prewired and tested at an indoor facility prior to being shipped to the site. A skid mounted blower system with a dial out feature or other electronic notification feature will be installed to provide remote monitoring of the leachate tanks and landfill sump levels.

Conceptual Layout The header/lateral piping will be designed to maintain a minimum three percent slope inside waste and will be arranged to minimize the number of low spots which will require a condensate removal device. Condensate sumps and traps will be utilized, as necessary, to collect and remove condensate from the system. These structures will be designed to maintain a velocity of less than 15 feet per second. Pumps for the condensate sumps will be sized, if necessary, based on an estimated condensation generation and expected head losses.

Figure 1 in Appendix D depicts the Conceptual GCCS and Leachate Collection Layout.

1 9

Page 24: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

6 . 0 L EACHATE D ISPOSAL

The NABORS Landfill has leachate collection systems for Area 1-1, Area 1-2, Area 1-3, and the southern Class 4 landfills. Currently, leachate is collected in storage tanks located around the disposal units and hauled to a wastewater treatment plant in Springfield, Missouri. Based on Annual Engineering Inspection Reports, annual leachate production is anticipated to be in excess of 1.5 million gallons. A summary of the historical leachate production per disposal unit is presented in Figure 7.

Figure 7 - Annual Leachate Production

The cost associated with the current disposal process is substantial. Although leachate production is anticipated to drop once the final cover is installed, SCS believes there are monetary benefits to installing an alternative leachate disposal system. These alternatives are summarized in the following sections.

6 . 1 L EA C H A TE D I S P O S A L D EV I C ES

6 . 1 . 1 L e a c h a t e E v a p o r a t o r

The idea of leachate evaporation is relatively simple. The leachate is boiled until the liquid vaporizes and the volatiles are destroyed. Once the liquid is evaporated off, the residue is discharged into a roll-off tank. Some liquid is anticipated to still be present in the roll-off tank;

2 0

Page 25: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

these liquids will drain to a sump that pumps back into the leachate holding structure. Once the residuals have drained off, it is believed that the residuals should pass the paint filter test.

Preliminary leachate testing is completed to determine how many gallons of residual solids can be expected per day of operation. A 30,000 gpd leachate evaporator SCS is currently designing is anticipated to need to fill a roll-off in approximately one week. Furthermore, depending on the leachate results, the residual may be determined to be a RCRA waste if it is hauled offsite.

SCS is seeing more RFP’s expressing interest in leachate evaporators and will be installing and starting up at least two units this summer. However, in the past, previous units were very labor intensive and required a lot of troubleshooting. The two units being installed this summer will be capable of evaporating 30,000 gallons of leachate per day. These 30,000 gpd evaporators require approximately 476 scfm of landfill gas with 50% methane. A smaller 15,000 gpd evaporator requiring 275 scfm is available.

As discussed in the Gas System section, LFG production can be estimated by running a LandGEM model.

Table 4 - Estimated LFG Production

2017 LFG Production

(SCFM) 2022 LFG Production

(SCFM) 2027 LFG Production

(SCFM)

AP-42 338 277 227

SCS 400 253 159

CAA 637 496 386

Based on these LFG production estimates, a 15,000 gpd leachate evaporator would likely be able to operate solely off the GCCS for several years. Once LFG production decreases, leachate recirculation may be used to increase LFG production and/or propane may be used to supplement the LFG. At that time, however, leachate production should be greatly reduced and operation of the leachate evaporator would not be required as often. In general, the leachate evaporator is operated when leachate is available for evaporation. Otherwise, the LFG is destroyed at the flare.

6 . 1 . 2 D e e p W e l l I n j e c t i o n

Deep well injection is currently being utilized by some landfills across the nation to dispose of leachate. However, the cost for permitting and installation will likely far exceed a reasonable return on investment for a facility that produces 1.8 million gallons of leachate or less annually.

2 1

Page 26: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

The United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Underground Injection Control’s program has established threshold criteria for protection of surface and groundwater drinking water supplies and providing for safe injection of industrial wastewaters including:

Confining leachate fluids; Documenting the injection zone’s capacity for long-term disposal; Demonstrating chemical compatibility of waste streams with the disposal zone and all

well components; Implementing a comprehensive and regular waste fluid testing program; Implementing a rigorous leak detection, process monitoring, compliance, and reporting

program; and Meeting strict financial assurance qualifications for well decommissioning.

The intent of a feasibility study is not to address each permitting requirement but to determine if there are any fatal flaws present with respect to siting a Class I non-hazardous injection well at the NABORS Landfill. It is SCS’s opinion that the permitting obstacle is likely to represent a fatal flaw in this instance due to operational issues with other deep wells in Arkansas.

Dependent on the chosen injection interval, the anticipated costs for permitting, drilling and completion of a deep, cased injection well would be approximately $3,000,000 to $5,000,000. Annual operation and maintenance costs may range from $50,000 to $200,000.

6 . 1 . 3 A r t i f i c i a l W e t l a n d L e a c h a t e T r e a t m e n t

Some facilities have been permitted to treat the leachate on site through pretreatment systems and then release to an artificial wetland which will polish off contaminates prior to the wetland discharging to a naturally occurring body of water. This system would have large initial capital outlay and would be very labor intensive to operate and maintain. The time constraints and for the closure of the NABORS Landfill are not ideal for this type of development.

6 . 1 . 4 L e a c h a t e R e c i r c u l a t i o n / I n j e c t i o n i n t o t h e W a s t e

Leachate recirculation is completed at many facilities across the nation, mainly to address times of high leachate production. The most commonly accepted practice includes applying leachate to an active working face with temporary berms constructed to prevent leachate from discharging into the stormwater collection system. As the NABORS Landfill is a closed facility, the only working face will be created during the process of moving waste.

Leachate application through constructed pipe distributions systems can distribute leachate evenly throughout the waste mass. Concerns with this process include clogging of the piping/perforations and localized flooding. SCS does not anticipate recirculation to be performed frequent enough for these concerns to be detrimental.

2 2

Page 27: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

6 . 1 . 5 L e a c h a t e P o n d s

Leachate ponds have some potential advantages as evaporation may assist with reducing the amount of leachate that must be hauled from the facility. Additionally, leachate ponds have to be designed with a cover system or constructed in a manner to handle rainfall. Mechanical aerators can also be utilized in leachate ponds to enhance additional evaporation. The following items may be included in leachate pond construction:

Low permeability soil liner; HDPE geomembrane; Perimeter fence; GCL (optional); and Leak detection layer (optional).

A typical leak detection layer includes a soil sub-base, geomembrane, geocomposite or other drainage media, GCL, and a second geomembrane. A permanent tanker loading mechanism would be constructed in the pond to allow the removal of leachate without causing damage to the liner system. Construction of a leachate pond would be in accordance with applicable Arkansas Regulations.

Since the annual rainfall is greater than annual evaporation for Mountain Home, Arkansas, a removable structure would need to be installed over the pond. This cover would prevent excess rainfall from entering the pond and allow for removal during dry weather conditions.

6 . 1 . 6 C e n t r a l i z e d L e a c h a t e T a n k F a r m a n d F o r c e m a i n

A centralized leachate tank farm, although not a disposal mechanism, will be a necessary part of infrastructure to provide a storage buffer between leachate generation and leachate disposal. A new forcemain would be utilized to connect all current leachate collection systems and pump the leachate to a centralized tank farm. The tank farm would be located near the GCCS flare between Area 1-2 and Area 1-3.

6 . 2 P OT E NT I A L L EA C H A T E D I S P OS A L O P T I O NS

SCS has performed an evaluation on the previously mentioned leachate management options and their compatibility with the NABORS Landfill. Deep Well Injection and Artificial Wetland Leachate Treatment are not recommended due to the price of installation and maintenance, as well as, potential environmental impact. SCS believes the following options provide the most feasible long-term leachate disposal for the NABORS Landfill.

OPTION 1 – Leachate Evaporator in Conjunction with a Centralized Tank Farm A 15,000 gpd leachate evaporator could be used in conjunction with centralized holding tanks. The Cell 4 Area that was proposed for future use in Area 1-3 could be used to centralize the

2 3

Page 28: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

location of the leachate management facility. The leachate management facility would require a series of forcemains (approximately 8,000 linear feet double-contained pipe) to pump from the existing leachate disposal areas to the centralized tank farm. Upgrades to existing pumps and/or lift station installation may be necessary for the new forcemain. This tank farm would consist of holding tanks capable of storing at least 2 weeks of leachate production and would also require a secondary containment in the case of a leak or spill. It is recommended that the evaporator be started manually and then shut off automatically. The interval for leachate evaporator start-up will be dependent on current leachate and LFG production. If this option is chosen, there must be a disposal method designated for residuals from the leachate evaporator. This would likely include hauling them to another disposal facility.

OPTION 2 – Leachate Evaporator in Conjunction with a Centralized Holding Pond Rather than using holding tanks, Option 2 would utilize a centralized holding pond to store leachate. As previously discussed, the pond would be sized with 2 feet of freeboard.

OPTION 3 – Centralized Tank Farm with Weekly Disposal to Tanker Trucks Option 3 would utilize the tanks to centralize all of the leachate for hauling. This option would still require the cost of hauling and disposal but would centralize all the disposal locations and alleviate access issues for the hauling truck. SCS anticipates five 20,000 gallon tanks would be required for storage, as well as, a secondary containment.

OPTION 4 – Centralized Holding Pond with Weekly Disposal to Tanker Trucks Like the centralized tank farm, this option would still require the cost of hauling but would centralize all the disposal locations to one point.

In addition to the engineering feasibility of the leachate disposal options, SCS performed a cost analysis between installing a leachate evaporator versus continuing to haul/dispose leachate to Springfield, Missouri. The analysis was based on the following assumptions:

Leachate production will decrease at a similar rate as the LFG (the SCS LandGEM flow rates were used for this analysis).

The cost to transport and dispose of the leachate is $0.26 per gallon. The estimated capital required to install a leachate evaporator is $918,500 (includes

materials, installation, labor, start-up, and dual containment). The estimated annual cost to operate the leachate evaporator is $54,000 (includes

electricity, part replacement, and O&M costs). The cost to install a forcemain to a centralized tank farm/holding pond is not included

because the system will be installed for either scenario.

Table 5 summarizes the estimated cumulative cost for a leachate evaporator versus hauling over the first ten years after closure.

2 4

Page 29: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Table 5 – Cost Analysis of Leachate Evaporator vs Hauling

Year Estimated LFG Flow (scfm)

Estimated Leachate Volume

(gallons)

Cumulative Estimated Leachate

Evaporator Cost

Cumulative Estimated Hauling

Disposal Cost Cumulative Cost

Savings

2017 401 1,500,000 $ 918,500 $ 390,000 $ (528,500) 2018 366 1,368,158 $ 972,500 $ 745,721 $ (226,779) 2019 333 1,247,904 $ 1,026,500 $ 1,070,176 $ 43,676 2020 304 1,138,219 $ 1,080,500 $ 1,366,113 $ 285,613 2021 277 1,038,176 $ 1,134,500 $ 1,636,039 $ 501,539 2022 253 946,925 $ 1,188,500 $ 1,882,239 $ 693,739 2023 231 863,696 $ 1,242,500 $ 2,106,800 $ 864,300 2024 211 787,781 $ 1,296,500 $ 2,311,623 $ 1,015,123 2025 192 718,539 $ 1,350,500 $ 2,498,444 $ 1,147,944 2026 175 655,383 $ 1,404,500 $ 2,668,843 $ 1,264,343

The cost savings accumulated by evaporating the leachate instead of hauling would be able to recover the estimated capital required to install a leachate evaporator by the year 2024. Based on the LFG production presented in Table 5 and the required flow rate of 275 scfm for leachate evaporation operation, leachate evaporation is not feasible after the year 2021. Additional LFG production may be achieved, however, through the implementation of leachate recirculation and proper gas system balancing/adjusting.

Based on the evaluation provided in this section and the items discussed at the February 19th, 2015 meeting with the ADEQ, SCS recommends installing a leachate evaporator in conjunction with a centralized tank farm. Additionally, SCS recommends installing a means to recirculate leachate back into the waste (Area 1-3) in the event it is necessary for additional LFG production and/or as a fail-safe leachate disposal option.

The Conceptual GCCS and Leachate Collection Layout are presented in Figure 1 in Appendix D.

2 5

Page 30: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

7 . 0 DEVELOP CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE P LAN

Class I, Area 1-1 was deemed closed on December 15, 1989 by the Department and the two year post closure period was enacted. Therefore Area 1-1 is closed and has completed the post closure care period and is not included in these plans. The Class 4 area to the east of Area 1-1 was deemed closed by the Department on September 3, 2009. The post closure care period was retroactively started on February 20, 2007 and was to last 2 years; therefore this area is not included in these plans. No post-closure completion certification for any areas was discovered.

7 . 1 C LOS U R E P LA N R EQ U I R EM EN TS

The Closure Plan will be in compliance with Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission (APCEC) Reg. 22.1301 - Closure Criteria and will contain the following components:

Description of Final Cover Agreed Upon with ADEQ A description of the agreed upon final cover system, designed in accordance with the regulations, and the methods and procedures to be used to install the cover will be discussed in the Closure Plan.

Estimate Total Area Requiring Final Cover The entire footprint of Area 1-2 as well as the constructed portions of Area 1-3, and the southern Class 4 area needs to be closed. At this time it is presumed that no additional cells will have to be constructed in Area 1-3 to handle the overfill regrading.

Waste Inventory for Site The facility kept waste receipt records from 1991 to closure. These records are a conglomeration of estimated cubic yards received; tons received and used air space based off of topographic maps. SCS will use these numbers along with the numbers associated in the permit to estimate total the total waste inventory for the site.

Schedule As required, a schedule for completing the following activities will be included in the closure plan.

Closure Plan Approval. o This will be submitted to the Department for approval and will be placed in the

operating record.

Notification of cessations of waste acceptance. o The report will include the date that this cessation of waste acceptance letter was

submitted & the notice will be placed in the operating record if not already there.

2 6

Page 31: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Initiation of Closure Requirements. o Area 1-3 will be receiving waste from Area 1-2 and potentially gas well drilling

waste. Closure will start within 30 days of final waste acceptance in Area 1-3. Closure in Area 1-2 will be started within 30 days of the overfill being corrected. Class 4 will closure timeline will also be included in the plan.

Proper Grading Required. o As part of the waste overfill correction Area 1-2 & 1-3 will be filled to the

permitted waste design contours. The permitted waste design contours will prevent storm water run onto the landfill, not include depressions and will incorporated erosion control measures as necessary to protect the final cover and prevent off-site sedimentation.

Site Survey Site will be surveyed by a professional land surveyor to document the following.

Final elevations; Monitoring Points; Site boundaries; Limits of areas that received waste; Other permanent features:

o Benchmarks; o Access roads; o Buildings; o Gas monitoring; o Collection and processing systems; o Leachate collection; o Removal and storage systems; o Run-on and run-off control systems.

Recording of Land Use Restrictions Following closure a notation on the deed to the landfill facility property or some other instrument that is normally examined during title search. The deed notation shall be furnished to the Department and a copy will be placed in the operating record. The notation must notify the potential purchaser of the property of:

The past use of the land as a landfill facility; Future land uses shall comply with APCEC regulations; and shall not disturb the integrity

of the final cover system, the liner system, or any other components of the containment or monitoring system;

It is unlawful to build any structure for residential purposes on the actual waste disposal footprint area;

2 7

Page 32: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

The land was used for the disposal of asbestos containing material; The survey plot and record of the location and quantity of asbestos containing waste

disposed of within the disposal site required in Regulation number 21, Arkansas Asbestos Abatement Regulation, have been filed with the Department.

Certification of Closure Following closure of each unit, a final closure report shall accompany the certification that includes:

The final survey; Quality control and quality assurance data documenting proper construction and

installation of the cover system; A copy of the deed notation; Other information as the Department may deem necessary to certify the grading and

erosion control measures were implemented as necessary.

Department Certification of Closure Upon written request the Department will inspect the site for conformance to closure requirements. Once the facility has completed closure the Department will approve in writing that the facility is eligible for inclusion under the Arkansas Landfill Post Closure Trust Fund. The Department’s written certification of closure begins the post closure period.

7 . 2 P OS T C L OS U R E C A R E P L A N

As previously discussed the post closure care period for Area 1-1 and the class 4 area east of Area 1-1 were closed and their post closure care periods have expired, however no post closure care certificates appear to have been issued by the Department.

Post Closure Care Plan Requirements The post closure care plan will be in compliance with APCEC Reg. 22.1302- Post Closure Care Requirements and will include the following components.

Post Closure Care Plan Period Class 1 areas which accepted waste on or after October 9, 1993, Area 1-2 & Area 1-3, shall have a post closure care period conducted for 30 years. The southern Class 4 area shall have a post closure care period conducted for 2 years. The length of the post-closure care period may be decreased or increased by the Director if it is determined by the Director that the proposed period is sufficient/insufficient to protect human health and the environment.

Description of Monitoring, Maintenance, and Frequency The Post closure plan will include a description of the monitoring, maintenance activities and frequency at which these activities will be performed.

2 8

Page 33: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Final cover; including making repairs as necessary to correct: o Settlement; o Subsidence; o Erosion; o Leachate seepage; o Other events; o Preventing run-on and run-off from eroding or otherwise damaging the final

cover; o And Maintaining the cover vegetation:

Periodically mowing to control undesirable vegetation and to facilitate inspection;

Cracked and eroded and uneven areas must be filled and reseeded; Ditches must be maintained.

Leachate collection system, shall maintain and operate as required in Reg. 22.429; Groundwater monitoring in accordance with Chapter 12 and maintaining system; Gas monitoring system shall be maintained and operated in accordance with Reg.

22.415; Gas collection and processing systems shall be maintained and operated if applicable; Surface water control systems shall be maintained and operated in accordance with

Reg. 22.419 & Reg. 22.427 or until permanent erosion control measures have been established.

Site Contact Information The name, address and telephone number of the person or office to contact about the facility during the post-closure period shall be included in the post closure care plan

Description of the Planed Uses for the Property The plan will recommend that the landfill be used as a grassland with no future developments during the post closure period.

Post Closure Care Plan Approval The post closure care plan will be placed in the operating record and submitted to the Department for approval.

Certification of Post Closure Completion Following completion of the post-closure care period for each landfill unit a written certification to the Director, signed by an independent registered professional engineer, verifying the post-closure care has been completed in accordance with the post-closure care plan and shall place the certification in the operating record.

Phasing of Closure and Post Closure Care

2 9

Page 34: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

D e s i g n C r i t e r i a R e p o r t

Sites cannot be eligible for inclusion in the Post Closure Trust Fund until such time as all active contiguous landfill units are closed and certified by the Department. Area 1-1 and the Class 4 area east of this area have already been closed and completed the minimum time for the post closure care period. However, Area 1-2, Area 1-3 and the southern Class 4 area will likely begin the post closure period at the same time but may be registered separately if a significant amount of time will vary between final closures for each landfill unit.

Post Closure Land Uses Post closure use of the property shall not disturb the final cover, liners, or other components of the containment system or the function of the collection, control, processing, and monitoring systems unless necessary to comply with regulations.

The Director may approve any other disturbance if it demonstrates that disturbance will not increase the potential threat to human health or the environment.

The landfill property is proposed to be vegetated and then left vacant with only necessary maintenance activities occurring on-site.

3 0

Page 35: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Appendix A

Site Inspection Notes

Page 36: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Site Inspection Notes – 12.16.14 Closure of Inactive NABORS Landfill

Class 4

Road is difficult to access. ‘Homemade’ leachate collection (pipe inserted into low point with submersible pump -

Terracon). Waste in Class 4 is prone to retaining water. Historical testing of leachate indicates it is not strong leachate. 1” dia. buried pipe connects pump to storage tank. Leachate will continue to be collected through an automated system. West side is flat and promotes ponding of storm water.

Cell Construction

Bedrock is a pain, screening is a pain.

General Notes

Area 1-1 has vegetative growth (probably due to mixing topsoil with dry sludge) Recirculation plan was developed for Area 1-3, but leachate will not penetrate clay material. Area 1-2 would allow recirculation. There have been issues with valves on leachate transport lines during times of freezing

temperatures. Could be fixed by installing all piping underground with heat tracing. Estimated annual leachate volume ~ 500k-600k gallons. Leachate has only been bad the last few years. One onsite building is not structurally stable. Water service will be from wells. Some wells may need to be plugged. Fencing will be easier to install just outside the disposal areas. If the property is split in the future, the areas would need to be divided by a fence. Leachate seeps were identified on the south side of Class 4 and west side of Area 1-2. West side of Area 1-2 road is difficult to access. Records of quarterly inspections will help identify seeps. Ponds likely contain a significant amount of silt and will need to be cleaned. Ponds will need to be taken out eventually, once the site is stable. Berm on east side of Area 1-3 needs to be worked on. Existing leachate collection piping/tanks from all areas is complicated (some gravity drain, some

are pumped).

Page 37: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Appendix B

Historical Soil Data Tables and Proposed Boring Locations

Page 38: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

3 inch 3/4 inch 3/8 inch No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 2003-1 16-16.5 39.8 79 25 54 100 91 85 81 76 70 Shelby Tube 9.70E-07 CH Dolomite at 20 ft., 2-7 ft. stiff tan silty clay with 10 % chert, 7-20 ft. stiff reddish tan and tan silty clay, firm below 14 ft.3-2 Dolomite at 22 ft., 4-22 ft. reddish tan and tan silty clay3-3 Dolomite at 10 ft., 3-10 ft. reddish tan silty clay, yellowish tan with tan and gray broken dolomite seams below 8 ft.3-4 Dolomite at 7 ft., 3.5-7 ft. reddish tan and tan silty clay with some chert, yellowish tan below 6 ft.3-5 15.5-16.5 33 100 89 86 84 81 79 CH Dolomite at 21 ft., 4-21 ft. stiff reddish brn with yellowish tan silty clay with ferrous strains, mostly yellowish tan below 15 ft.3-6 1 16.5 100 77 71 64 59 51 ML3-6 14.5 100 74 49 36 28 25 GC3-7 11-11.5 35.6 84 29 55 100 94 91 88 83 80 79 Shelby Tube 8.00E-08 CH3-7 20.5-21 27.6 73 26 47 CH3-8 7.5-8 30.5 62 28 34 100 86 80 73 64 58 CH Dolomite at 22.5 ft., 2-22.5 ft. very stiff reddish brn silty clay with chert fragments, brn below 11 ft., chert layers at 9-11 and 15-174-1 Dolomite at 3 ft.4-2 Dolomite at 10 ft., 4-9.5 ft. reddish tan and tan silty clay with some chert fragments, yellowish clay below 5 ft.4-3 Dolomite at 3 ft., 1.5-3 ft. very stiff brn silty clay with ferrous nodules4-4 4-5 25.5 100 99 97 97 83 CL Dolomite at 6 ft., 2-6 ft. tan silty clay with frequent chert 4-5 Dolomite at 8 ft., 4-8 ft. mottled reddish brn and light gray silty clay with ferrous nodules and chert fragments4-6 3-7 32.1 100 96 86 72 53 38 33 GC Dolomite at 7 ft., 3-7 ft., yellowish tan silty clay with frequent chert fragments4-7 Dolomite at 0.5 ft.4-9 Dolomite at 21 ft., 2-21 ft., reddish tan and tan silty clay with some chert fragments

4-10 Dolomite at 5 ft., 1.5-2.5 ft. reddish brn silty clay with chert fragments, hard gray chert broken 2.5-5 ft.4-11 3-3.5 28 100 92 89 86 84 83 CH Dolomite at 5 ft., 2.5-14 ft. very stiff reddish brn silty clay with some chert fragments, 50% chert below 9 ft.4-12 12.5-13 28.3 64 24 40 100 96 85 79 77 74 Shelby Tube 1.10E-06 CH Dolomite and chert at 29.5 ft., 2.5-29 ft. very stiff reddish brn silty clay with some chert, 30% chert below 15 ft.4-13 4-5.5 42.6 78 27 51 CH4-13 10-10.5 25.1 100 94 92 88 76 63 CH4-15 2.5-3.5 40.7 96 28 68 100 98 96 CH Dolomite at 5.5 ft., 1-5.5 ft. very stiff reddish brn silty clay with some chert4-16 Dolomite at 7 ft., 4-7 ft. stiff brn silty clay with ferrous nodules and chert gravel4-17 10-11 44.3 70 26 44 CH Dolomite at 12 ft., 2.5-8 ft. reddish tan and brn silty clay with chert fragments and rootlets, stiff brn and yellowish tan clay with organic matter and rootlets 8-12 ft.105 Dolomite at 13.5 ft., 2-13.5 ft. very stiff brn silty clay with rootlets, reddish brn below 6 ft., chert layer from 11-12 ft., frequent chert below 12 ft.301 10-10.5 52.6 58 25 33 CH Dolomite at 13 ft,3-13 ft. very stiff reddish tan silty clay with frequent chert above 7 ft., more than 50% chert below 11.5 ft.302 Dolomite at 2 ft.303 1-2 6.9 100 94 83 68 55 43 SM303 8.5-9.5 61.2 65 23 42 CH304 6-8 26 45 19 26 CL304 9.5-10 20.5 59 21 38 100 87 86 82 80 79 70 Shelby Tube 1.30E-08 CH304 25-26 36.2 100 98 94 89 81 CH306 6-6.53 26.5 100 99 98 98 95 CH Dolomite at 13.5 ft., 2.5-13.5 ft. very stiff reddish brn silty clay with chert seams, brn clay below 5 ft., chert layer from 11-11.5 ft.307 7-8 17.9 100 98 89 79 69 62 CH307 15-16 44 100 94 88 79 72 69 CH412 Dolomite at 14 ft., 5-14 ft., 5-8 ft. is brn silty clay with chert seam, below 8 ft. is reddish tan silty clay with 20% chert414 13-13.5 42.7 100 86 69 54 44 37 36 GC414 18-19 62 68 23 45 CH

Dolomite at 24 ft., 1.5-24 ft. very stiff reddish tan silty clay with chert seams, frequent chert from 7-11 ft., several chert layers below 19 ft.

Dolomite at 29 ft., 1.5 -29 ft. stiff to very stiff reddish brn silty clay with some chert, chert layers at 7-7.5 ft., 10-11.5ft, 20.5-21.5 ft., tan silty clay seams below 17 ft.

Dolomite at 21.5 ft., 4-21.5 ft. stiff reddish tan silty clay with frequent chert 4-7 ft.

Dolomite at 30 ft., 6-30 stiff reddish brn silty clay with blocky clay pockets slickensided, yellowish tan below 15 ft.

Dolomite at 14 ft., 4-14 ft., reddish brn and tan silty clay with some chert, chert more frequent below 11 ft.

Dolomite at 17 ft., 4.5-17 ft. reddish brn silty clay with chert seams, more chert from 9.5-10.5 ft., no chert below 10.5 ft., below 14 ft. more chert

Dolomite at 26.5 ft., 2-26.5 ft. stiff reddish brn silty clay with chert seams, 60% chert from 4-6 ft., less than 20% below 6 ft., frequent chert below 16 ft.

Mechanical Analysis Remolded or Shelby Tube

L.L. DescriptionPermeability (cm/sec)

ClassificationP.L.Boring

numberLocation

Depth (ft)

Natural water

contentP.I.

Summary of Boring Log DataNabors Landfill

Page 39: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

3-in 3/4-in 3/8-in No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200Area 1-1 1 85 30.4 Shelby Tube 107 29.2 1.50E-08Area 1-1 3 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 96 24.6 8.70E-09Area 1-1 5 99.9 20.1 Shelby Tube 93.2 97 25.7 2.08E-08Area 1-1 7 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 92 96 20.2 7.50E-09Area 1-1 7 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 90.5 95 25.6 3.40E-08Area 1-2 2 89.9 29.2 87.5 97 27.9 2.80E-08Area 1-2 3Area 1-2 4Area 1-2 5Area 1-2 6 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 95.1 99 19.7 5.50E-09Area 1-2 7 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 98.2 102 17.7 5.40E-08Area 1-2 8 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 96.7 101 21.1 1.20E-08Area 1-2 8 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 93.3 97 21.9 5.60E-08Area 1-2 9 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 91.4 95 26.4 2.90E-08Area 1-2 9 96.2 23.3 Shelby Tube 96.4 101 24.6Area 1-2 9 85.6 29.4 Shelby Tube 3.80E-08Area 1-2 10 88 27.1 Shelby Tube 95.6 109 21.5 4.68E-08Area 1-2 10 88 27.1 Shelby Tube 94.3 107 22.6 1.64E-08Area 1-2 11 90.2 28.4 Shelby Tube 100.3 26.1 2.51E-08Area 1-2 11 87.5 30.1 Shelby Tube 103.7 25.8 1.91E-08Area 1-2 12 98 22.9 Shelby Tube 85.7 87.4 31.4 1.96E-08 Reddish brn sandy clay w/ some chertArea 1-2 12 90.2 28.4 61 25 36 Shelby Tube 81.2 90.02 34.1 5.95E-08 Reddish brn sandy clay w/ some chertArea 1-2 12 90.2 28.4 Shelby Tube 86.7 96.1 33.4 1.51E-08 Reddish brn sandy clay w/ some chertArea 1-2 13 87.5 30.1 Shelby Tube 84.8 96.9 34.8 8.43E-09 Red clay w/ chertArea 1-2 13 87.5 30.1 Shelby Tube 89 101.7 28.7 3.08E-08 Red clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 88.6 26.6 7.60E-08 Reddish brn clayArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 89.6 24.1 7.16E-08 Reddish brn clayArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 88.59 33.16 1.86E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 73.7 38.9 7.79E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 82.72 34.61 1.69E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 80.75 37.57 3.16E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 80.36 34.15 2.85E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 79.05 35.74 9.51E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 90.27 30.3 9.60E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 84.11 34.34 2.30E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 86.91 32.64 4.48E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 86.07 31.53 9.32E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 90.14 28.41 3.60E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 87.63 31.58 2.55E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 89.8 31.27 1.39E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 85.28 34.15 1.59E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 92.49 27.64 7.37E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 94.01 30.26 1.71E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 86.03 36.81 7.33E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 93.59 29.21 1.28E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 91.98 26.92 3.66E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 14 Shelby Tube 85.27 31.16 6.32E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 89.5 28.5 52 26 26 Reddish brn clay w/ chert

Dry Density

% Compaction of MDD

Moisture Content

Mechanical Analysis Remolded or Shelby Tube

Hydraulic Conductivity

Summary of Soil Test Data for Liner ConstructionNabors Landfill

Test Location

ZoneStandard Proctor

L.L. P.L. P.I. Permeability (cm/sec)

Max Dry Density

DescriptionOptimum Moisture

Page 40: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

3-in 3/4-in 3/8-in No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200Dry

Density % Compaction of

MDDMoisture Content

Mechanical Analysis Remolded or Shelby Tube

Hydraulic Conductivity

Summary of Soil Test Data for Liner ConstructionNabors Landfill

Test Location

ZoneStandard Proctor

L.L. P.L. P.I. Permeability (cm/sec)

Max Dry Density

DescriptionOptimum Moisture

Area 1-2 15 90.1 26 58 31 27 Remolded 84 93.2 31 6.32E-06 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 82.9 32.9 75 27 48 100 99 97 83 Remolded 78.79 95.17 38.4 8.51E-07 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 82.6 28 65 27 38 100 95 81 80 74 68 65 Remolded 88.24 106.8 32.3 8.36E-07 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 82.5 34.2 75 25 50 98 98 97 95 93 88 Remolded 78.4 95 39.62 9.54E-07 brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 87.08 28.76 2.48E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 87.04 31.54 2.62E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 87.36 31.32 9.93E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 85.45 33.44 9.98E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 102.65 21.2 1.00E-07 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 86.27 32.65 1.16E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 89.35 30.65 5.59E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 89.51 28.5 1.17E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 85.85 33.08 3.12E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 86.46 32.22 1.29E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 92.47 28.5 1.08E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 85.54 34.5 3.35E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 93.55 26.68 8.66E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 87.75 30.25 4.30E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 81.11 35.92 1.08E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 85.93 30.55 6.21E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 81.48 38.45 4.47E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 88.43 30.77 2.73E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 90.39 32.74 2.73E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 86.27 33.26 1.34E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 86.02 31.82 7.99E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 87.61 31.11 9.95E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 91.19 21.53 2.94E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Shelby Tube 94.83 21.12 3.04E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 15 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 85.8 28.8 62 24 38 Reddish brn fat clay w/ shaleArea 1-2 16 92.5 25.5 58 22 36 Reddish brn fat clayArea 1-2 16 87.5 19.5 53 25 28 Reddish brn fat clay w/ shaleArea 1-2 16 94 27.5 58 25 33 Reddish brn shalely fat clayArea 1-2 16 90 26.5 58 20 38 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 79.22 35.42 2.10E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 89.46 37.68 1.34E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 103.64 30.98 1.42E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 85.02 36.38 1.07E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 92.18 29.29 1.59E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 96.8 33.9 1.69E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 103.91 26.59 3.05E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 97.63 35.42 1.26E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 16 Shelby Tube 78.04 34.43 1.76E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 86.3 30.4 66 28 38 100 98 97 96 95 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 95.5 24 65 21 44 Reddish brn grvly fat clayArea 1-2 17 85.8 28.8 62 24 38 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 92.5 25.5 58 22 36 Reddish brn fat clay w/ shaleArea 1-2 17 87.5 19.5 53 25 28 Reddish brn fat clay

Page 41: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

3-in 3/4-in 3/8-in No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200Dry

Density % Compaction of

MDDMoisture Content

Mechanical Analysis Remolded or Shelby Tube

Hydraulic Conductivity

Summary of Soil Test Data for Liner ConstructionNabors Landfill

Test Location

ZoneStandard Proctor

L.L. P.L. P.I. Permeability (cm/sec)

Max Dry Density

DescriptionOptimum Moisture

Area 1-2 17 94 27.5 58 25 33 Reddish brn fat clay w/ shaleArea 1-2 17 90 26.5 58 20 38 Reddish brn shaley fat clayArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 87.88 30.71 6.51E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 88.22 31.02 1.73E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 84.3 33.85 8.48E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 83.88 34.08 4.00E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 86.99 34.72 9.65E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 89 31.02 8.21E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 89.69 29.92 1.45E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-2 17 Shelby Tube 93 28.65 2.17E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ chertArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr PR 82.7 33.7 66 28 38 92.2 89.4 Remold 78.4 94.8 34.09 6.30E-08 Red clay w/ chertArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr PR 100.9 20.8 70 23 47 85.7 68.5 Remold 94.7 23.65 3.00E-07 Yellowish brn, silty clay, some course to fine sand and grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr PR 85.8 29.6 78 28 50 94.2 75.8 Remold 94.8 31.79 8.10E-07 Reddish brn, silty clay , some course to fine sand and grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr PR 95.2 25 60 25 35 99.1 87.5 Remold 95.5 24.74 3.00E-07 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr PR 82.9 31.3 58 34 24 96.9 81.6 Remold 95.1 31.6 5.60E-06 Yellowish brn, clayey silt, some coarse to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr PR 87.8 28.8 57 24 33 96.7 79.7 Remold 94.5 29.69 8.60E-06 Reddish brn, silty clay , some course to fine sand and grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr Shelby Tube 87.77 31.06 3.80E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr Shelby Tube 81.99 34.75 1.30E-07 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr Shelby Tube 82.05 32.88 3.40E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr Shelby Tube 75.32 40.72 4.20E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 subgr Shelby Tube 70.6 37.1 9.60E-07 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR 92.7 33.7 66 28 38 92.2 89.4 Remold 95 34.09 6.30E-08 Red clayArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR 100.9 20.8 70 23 47 85.7 68.5 Remold 98.3 25.83 4.70E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, some course to fine sand and grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR 85.8 29.6 78 28 50 94.2 75.8 Remold 98 33.77 2.10E-08 Reddish brn, silty clay, some course to fine sand and grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR 95.2 25 60 25 35 99.1 87.5 Remold 98.1 27.89 1.90E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR 93 25.5 59 27 32 88.3 73.4 Remold 98.4 30.81 4.50E-08 Reddish brn, silty clay, some course to fine sand and grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR 85.3 32.4 76 33 43 99.6 96.5 Remold 98.4 35.19 2.90E-08 Reddish brn, silty clay, trace med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR 91.9 27 68 34 34 90 84.1 Remold 97.7 32.64 6.70E-08 Reddish brn, clayey silt, coarse to fine grvl, coarse to fine sandArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner PR Shelby Tube 80.21 33.69 4.70E-08 Reddish brn, silty clay, some course to fine sand and trace grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 86.33 31.21 3.90E-08 Reddish brn, silty clay, some course to fine sand and trace grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 85.05 34.36 6.50E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 81.98 33.6 6.40E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 85.25 33.76 2.50E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 85.9 30.8 7.30E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 79.01 36.22 8.90E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 84.01 31.77 2.80E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 80.52 35.94 2.90E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 81.63 34.87 3.20E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 81.08 30.68 8.10E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 85.22 32.94 2.80E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 89.87 31.31 3.30E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 80.81 36.11 3.40E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 78.26 40.79 3.30E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 86.52 34.93 2.50E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 83.96 36.87 2.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 87.35 32.52 2.40E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 84.34 36.23 2.80E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 84.79 36.75 2.50E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvl

Page 42: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

3-in 3/4-in 3/8-in No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200Dry

Density % Compaction of

MDDMoisture Content

Mechanical Analysis Remolded or Shelby Tube

Hydraulic Conductivity

Summary of Soil Test Data for Liner ConstructionNabors Landfill

Test Location

ZoneStandard Proctor

L.L. P.L. P.I. Permeability (cm/sec)

Max Dry Density

DescriptionOptimum Moisture

Area 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 86.19 33.55 2.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 87.94 31.78 3.00E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 88.21 31.6 3.80E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 81.68 37.12 3.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 83.48 34.01 3.00E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 83.64 31.81 5.20E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 82.89 35.67 3.40E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 80.16 37.22 3.30E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 84.64 33.25 3.00E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 76.25 40.02 6.30E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 85.74 33.4 3.20E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 85.5 33.98 2.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 92.31 28.01 2.50E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 83.85 32.56 8.20E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 88.29 29.75 3.20E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 88.09 29.15 5.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 88.82 30.68 2.70E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 87.51 32.51 1.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 90.71 29.07 3.30E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 82.23 34.12 2.90E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 89.87 30.44 3.00E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 76.75 40.7 2.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 79.67 39.64 4.20E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 78.66 35.77 2.60E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 1 Liner Shelby Tube 90.1 31.86 3.30E-08 Yellowish brn, silty clay, med. to fine sand, trace fine grvlArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 88.3 28 62 32 30 95.3 87.5 Remold 86.8 98.1 30.4 1.00E-07 Red clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 86.8 27.3 61 22 39 82.1 57.6 Remold 88.3 97.9 31.13 4.30E-08 Light red clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 84.7 28 71 31 40 96.3 87.4 Remold 84.7 97.8 31.22 2.70E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 98.2 21.5 54 21 33 84.5 64.1 Remold 96.2 98 24.46 1.90E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 88.1 28.7 61 28 33 95.9 87.7 Remold 88.1 98 31.4 2.50E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 89.1 26 48 23 25 99 95.4 Remold 89.1 97.7 29.33 1.10E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 92.5 26 51 25 26 87.3 82.5 Remold 92.5 98.2 28.66 1.00E-08 Red brn fat clay w/ grvlArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 89.3 28.7 72 32 40 98.1 95.4 Remold 89.3 98.1 30.06 2.00E-08 Red fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner PR 78.9 37.2 79 33 46 100 96.4 Remold 78.9 97.9 40.26 1.00E-08 Red fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 87.74 31.37 1.10E-08 Red brn sandy clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 89.53 32.28 2.30E-08 Red brn sandy clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 86.06 33.02 2.00E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 84.79 33.62 1.00E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 77.62 42.67 1.90E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 85.88 30.32 8.70E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 82.53 36.86 1.70E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 85.57 32.62 1.80E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 85.24 33.41 2.50E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 89.17 31.19 1.60E-08 Red brn sandy clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 89.57 30.85 8.80E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 89.65 30.96 9.50E-09 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 87.95 31.96 1.90E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 87.88 33.68 1.80E-08 Red brn fat clay

Page 43: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

3-in 3/4-in 3/8-in No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200Dry

Density % Compaction of

MDDMoisture Content

Mechanical Analysis Remolded or Shelby Tube

Hydraulic Conductivity

Summary of Soil Test Data for Liner ConstructionNabors Landfill

Test Location

ZoneStandard Proctor

L.L. P.L. P.I. Permeability (cm/sec)

Max Dry Density

DescriptionOptimum Moisture

Area 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 89.23 31.85 8.70E-08 Red brn sandy clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 88.2 28.82 2.50E-08 Red brn clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 89.59 30.38 1.90E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 87.92 31.23 2.40E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 89.46 30.16 4.80E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 84.78 29.89 2.20E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 72.49 32.55 3.10E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 85.18 30.65 3.30E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 73.32 38.57 6.20E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 2 Liner Shelby Tube 84.53 29.06 3.20E-08 Red brn fat clayArea 1-3 Cell 3B PR 90.8 28 66 27 39 99 97 95 93 90 86 Remold 86.4 95 32.89 1.86E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B PR Remold 87.86 95 30.67 5.64E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 92.76 26.85 2.08E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 90.46 29.64 1.43E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 95.77 25.94 6.80E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 90.13 26.31 1.60E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 91.49 29.53 1.37E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 98.99 24.32 5.13E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 98.91 20.88 1.31E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 100.56 22.56 6.55E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 95.15 26.57 5.62E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 95.2 26.46 1.21E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 93.32 26.94 1.33E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 88.8 30.31 2.56E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 93.84 26.44 8.69E-09 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 96.29 25.47 1.10E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 93.97 25.12 3.57E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 87.72 31.09 1.87E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 89.55 23.93 4.27E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 94.98 24.6 1.02E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 93.54 24.18 2.46E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 81.96 34.71 5.53E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner Shelby Tube 90.85 28.1 2.30E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner 92.8 25.5 66 23 45 100 99 96 93 91 87 Remold 87.8 95 30.71 5.12E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner 95.5 24 64 22 42 100 97 92 89 86 82 Remold 88.05 95 28.26 8.79E-08 Reddish brn clay w/ some fine sand and trace of fine chert fragsArea 1-3 Cell 3B liner 59 23 36 100 97 95 92 89 85Area 1-3 Cell 3B liner 58 23 35 100 98 96 93 90 86Area 1-3 Cell 3B liner 58 23 35 100 98 94 92 89 85Area 1-3 Cell 3B liner 60 24 36 100 97 95 92 89 86Area 1-3 Cell 3B liner 61 24 37 100 98 95 92 89Area 1-3 Cell 3B liner 65 24 41 99 96 93 91 88Area 1-3 Cell 3A subgr PR 94.7 23.8 63 25 38 84 80 77 72 67 61 Remold 87.1 91.9 24.8 6.50E-06Area 1-3 Cell 3A subgr PR Remold 89 93.9 25.8 5.50E-07Area 1-3 Cell 3A subgr PR Remold 82.9 87.5 24.8 4.00E-05Area 1-3 Cell 3A liner PR 97.3 21.6 59 23 36 100 97 92 87 83 78 Remold 93.2 95.7 23.4 4.90E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ trace of grvlArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Remold 94.2 96.8 23.6 2.00E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ trace of grvlArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Remold 93.5 96 23.5 4.20E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvlArea 1-3 Cell 3A subgr PR 95.8 21.8 67 23 44 88 83 80 77 74 70

Page 44: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

3-in 3/4-in 3/8-in No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200Dry

Density % Compaction of

MDDMoisture Content

Mechanical Analysis Remolded or Shelby Tube

Hydraulic Conductivity

Summary of Soil Test Data for Liner ConstructionNabors Landfill

Test Location

ZoneStandard Proctor

L.L. P.L. P.I. Permeability (cm/sec)

Max Dry Density

DescriptionOptimum Moisture

Area 1-3 Cell 3A liner 98 21.9 61 24 37 99 92 87 82 78 73 Red clay w/ sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner 97.8 20.7 61 22 39 99 89 81 76 71 66 Red clay w/ grvlArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 96.6 22.8 7.30E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 91.8 27.2 2.50E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 94.3 24.3 4.60E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 98 22.6 2.70E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 97.6 24.2 2.10E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 95.3 23.3 1.30E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 92.9 25.7 2.40E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 91.1 29.9 7.70E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 94.3 23.8 4.50E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 91.6 27.5 3.00E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 93.4 28.9 7.50E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 96.8 23.4 6.20E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 96.6 23.7 3.80E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 95 26.1 7.60E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 97.3 24.4 1.80E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 93.1 26.8 2.00E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 100 25.3 1.20E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sandArea 1-3 Cell 3A liner Shelby Tube 97.4 25.7 2.80E-08 Reddish brn fat clay w/ grvl and sand

Page 45: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

1

MOUNTAIN HOME, ARKANSASNABORS LANDFILL

PROPOSED BORROW SOIL

7311 W. 130th St, Ste. 100

PH. (913) 681-0030 FAX. (913) 681-0012

SCS AQUATERRAOverland Park, Kansas 66213

CLOSURE OF INACTIVE NABORS LANDFILL

Page 46: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Appendix C

GCL Equivalency Technical Paper

Page 47: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 48: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 49: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 50: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 51: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 52: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 53: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 54: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 55: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 56: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 57: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 58: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 59: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 60: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 61: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 62: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 63: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 64: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 65: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 66: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 67: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 68: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Page 69: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Appendix D

Conceptual GCCS and Leachate Collection Layout

Page 70: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

1

MOUNTAIN HOME, ARKANSASNABORS LANDFILL

CONCEPTUAL GCCS AND LEACHATE COLLECTION LAYOUT

7311 W. 130th St, Ste. 100

PH. (913) 681-0030 FAX. (913) 681-0012

SCS AQUATERRAOverland Park, Kansas 66213

CLOSURE OF INACTIVE NABORS LANDFILL

Page 71: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Appendix E

LandGEM Models

Page 72: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

SCS Defaults

Page 73: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Summary ReportLandfill Name or Identifier: Nabors Landfill

Date:

First-Order Decomposition Rate Equation:

Where,QCH4 = annual methane generation in the year of the calculation (m 3 /year )i = 1-year time increment Mi = mass of waste accepted in the ith year (Mg ) n = (year of the calculation) - (initial year of waste acceptance)j = 0.1-year time incrementk = methane generation rate (year -1 )Lo = potential methane generation capacity (m 3 /Mg )

About LandGEM:

Thursday, February 19, 2015

LandGEM is based on a first-order decomposition rate equation for quantifying emissions from the decomposition of landfilled waste in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The software provides a relatively simple approach to estimating landfill gas emissions. Model defaults are based on empirical data from U.S. landfills. Field test data can also be used in place of model defaults when available. Further guidance on EPA test methods, Clean Air Act (CAA) regulations, and other guidance regarding landfill gas emissions and control technology requirements can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/landfill/landflpg.html.

Description/Comments:

tij = age of the jth section of waste mass Mi accepted in the ith year (decimal years , e.g., 3.2 years)

LandGEM is considered a screening tool — the better the input data, the better the estimates. Often, there are limitations with the available data regarding waste quantity and composition, variation in design and operating practices over time, and changes occurring over time that impact the emissions potential. Changes to landfill operation, such as operating under wet conditions through leachate recirculation or other liquid additions, will result in generating more gas at a faster rate. Defaults for estimating emissions for this type of operation are being developed to include in LandGEM along with defaults for convential landfills (no leachate or liquid additions) for developing emission inventories and determining CAA applicability. Refer to the Web site identified above for future updates.

REPORT - 1

Page 74: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Input Review

LANDFILL CHARACTERISTICSLandfill Open Year 1991Landfill Closure Year (with 80-year limit) 2012Actual Closure Year (without limit) 2012Have Model Calculate Closure Year? NoWaste Design Capacity megagrams

MODEL PARAMETERSMethane Generation Rate, k 0.092 year -1

Potential Methane Generation Capacity, Lo 94 m 3 /MgNMOC Concentration 4,000 ppmv as hexaneMethane Content 50 % by volume

GASES / POLLUTANTS SELECTEDGas / Pollutant #1: Total landfill gasGas / Pollutant #2: MethaneGas / Pollutant #3: Carbon dioxideGas / Pollutant #4: NMOC

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES

(Mg/year) (short tons/year) (Mg) (short tons)1991 34,078 37,486 0 01992 34,078 37,486 34,078 37,4861993 34,078 37,486 68,156 74,9721994 34,078 37,486 102,235 112,4581995 47,555 52,311 136,313 149,9441996 39,976 43,974 183,868 202,2551997 28,055 30,861 223,845 246,2291998 32,582 35,840 251,900 277,0901999 34,468 37,915 284,482 312,9302000 35,055 38,560 318,950 350,8452001 46,205 50,825 354,005 389,4052002 47,877 52,665 400,209 440,2302003 49,870 54,857 448,086 492,8952004 59,437 65,381 497,956 547,7522005 60,185 66,203 557,394 613,1332006 78,498 86,348 617,578 679,3362007 75,335 82,868 696,076 765,6842008 79,233 87,156 771,411 848,5522009 71,079 78,187 850,644 935,7082010 59,958 65,954 921,723 1,013,8952011 41,633 45,796 981,681 1,079,8492012 34,325 37,757 1,023,314 1,125,6452013 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022014 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022015 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022016 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022017 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022018 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022019 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022020 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022021 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022022 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022023 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022024 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022025 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022026 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022027 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022028 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022029 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022030 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,402

Year Waste Accepted Waste-In-Place

REPORT - 2

Page 75: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES (Continued)

(Mg/year) (short tons/year) (Mg) (short tons)2031 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022032 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022033 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022034 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022035 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022036 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022037 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022038 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022039 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022040 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022041 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022042 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022043 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022044 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022045 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022046 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022047 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022048 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022049 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022050 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022051 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022052 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022053 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022054 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022055 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022056 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022057 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022058 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022059 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022060 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022061 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022062 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022063 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022064 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022065 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022066 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022067 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022068 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022069 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022070 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,402

Waste-In-PlaceYear Waste Accepted

REPORT - 3

Page 76: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Pollutant Parameters

Concentration ConcentrationCompound (ppmv ) Molecular Weight (ppmv ) Molecular Weight

Total landfill gas 0.00Methane 16.04Carbon dioxide 44.01NMOC 4,000 86.181,1,1-Trichloroethane (methyl chloroform) - HAP 0.48 133.411,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - HAP/VOC 1.1 167.851,1-Dichloroethane (ethylidene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 2.4 98.971,1-Dichloroethene (vinylidene chloride) - HAP/VOC 0.20 96.941,2-Dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 0.41 98.961,2-Dichloropropane (propylene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 0.18 112.992-Propanol (isopropyl alcohol) - VOC 50 60.11Acetone 7.0 58.08

Acrylonitrile - HAP/VOC 6.3 53.06Benzene - No or Unknown Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 1.9 78.11Benzene - Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 11 78.11Bromodichloromethane - VOC 3.1 163.83Butane - VOC 5.0 58.12Carbon disulfide - HAP/VOC 0.58 76.13Carbon monoxide 140 28.01Carbon tetrachloride - HAP/VOC 4.0E-03 153.84Carbonyl sulfide - HAP/VOC 0.49 60.07Chlorobenzene - HAP/VOC 0.25 112.56Chlorodifluoromethane 1.3 86.47Chloroethane (ethyl chloride) - HAP/VOC 1.3 64.52Chloroform - HAP/VOC 0.03 119.39Chloromethane - VOC 1.2 50.49

Dichlorobenzene - (HAP for para isomer/VOC) 0.21 147

Dichlorodifluoromethane 16 120.91Dichlorofluoromethane - VOC 2.6 102.92Dichloromethane (methylene chloride) - HAP 14 84.94Dimethyl sulfide (methyl sulfide) - VOC 7.8 62.13Ethane 890 30.07Ethanol - VOC 27 46.08

Gas / Pollutant Default Parameters:

Pollu

tant

s

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:

Gas

es

REPORT - 4

Page 77: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Pollutant Parameters (Continued)

Concentration ConcentrationCompound (ppmv ) Molecular Weight (ppmv ) Molecular Weight

Ethyl mercaptan (ethanethiol) - VOC 2.3 62.13Ethylbenzene - HAP/VOC 4.6 106.16Ethylene dibromide - HAP/VOC 1.0E-03 187.88Fluorotrichloromethane - VOC 0.76 137.38Hexane - HAP/VOC 6.6 86.18Hydrogen sulfide 36 34.08Mercury (total) - HAP 2.9E-04 200.61Methyl ethyl ketone - HAP/VOC 7.1 72.11Methyl isobutyl ketone - HAP/VOC 1.9 100.16

Methyl mercaptan - VOC 2.5 48.11Pentane - VOC 3.3 72.15Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) - HAP 3.7 165.83Propane - VOC 11 44.09t-1,2-Dichloroethene - VOC 2.8 96.94Toluene - No or Unknown Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 39 92.13Toluene - Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 170 92.13Trichloroethylene (trichloroethene) - HAP/VOC 2.8 131.40Vinyl chloride - HAP/VOC 7.3 62.50Xylenes - HAP/VOC 12 106.16

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:Gas / Pollutant Default Parameters:

Pollu

tant

s

REPORT - 5

Page 78: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

REPORT - 6

Page 79: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Graphs

0.000E+00

2.000E+03

4.000E+03

6.000E+03

8.000E+03

1.000E+04

1.200E+04

Emis

sion

s

Year

Megagrams Per Year

Total landfill gas Methane Carbon dioxide NMOC

0.000E+001.000E+062.000E+063.000E+064.000E+065.000E+066.000E+067.000E+068.000E+069.000E+061.000E+07

Emis

sion

s

Year

Cubic Meters Per Year

Total landfill gas Methane Carbon dioxide NMOC

0.000E+00

1.000E+02

2.000E+02

3.000E+02

4.000E+02

5.000E+02

6.000E+02

7.000E+02

Emis

sion

s

Year

User-specified Unit (units shown in legend below)

Total landfill gas (av ft^3/min) Methane (av ft^3/min)

Carbon dioxide (av ft^3/min) NMOC (av ft^3/min)

REPORT - 7

Page 80: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Results

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)1991 0 0 0 0 0 01992 7.035E+02 5.633E+05 3.785E+01 1.879E+02 2.817E+05 1.892E+011993 1.345E+03 1.077E+06 7.237E+01 3.593E+02 5.385E+05 3.618E+011994 1.930E+03 1.546E+06 1.039E+02 5.156E+02 7.729E+05 5.193E+011995 2.464E+03 1.973E+06 1.326E+02 6.582E+02 9.866E+05 6.629E+011996 3.229E+03 2.586E+06 1.737E+02 8.626E+02 1.293E+06 8.687E+011997 3.771E+03 3.019E+06 2.029E+02 1.007E+03 1.510E+06 1.014E+021998 4.018E+03 3.218E+06 2.162E+02 1.073E+03 1.609E+06 1.081E+021999 4.338E+03 3.473E+06 2.334E+02 1.159E+03 1.737E+06 1.167E+022000 4.668E+03 3.738E+06 2.511E+02 1.247E+03 1.869E+06 1.256E+022001 4.981E+03 3.989E+06 2.680E+02 1.331E+03 1.994E+06 1.340E+022002 5.497E+03 4.402E+06 2.958E+02 1.468E+03 2.201E+06 1.479E+022003 6.002E+03 4.806E+06 3.229E+02 1.603E+03 2.403E+06 1.615E+022004 6.504E+03 5.208E+06 3.499E+02 1.737E+03 2.604E+06 1.750E+022005 7.160E+03 5.733E+06 3.852E+02 1.912E+03 2.867E+06 1.926E+022006 7.773E+03 6.224E+06 4.182E+02 2.076E+03 3.112E+06 2.091E+022007 8.710E+03 6.974E+06 4.686E+02 2.326E+03 3.487E+06 2.343E+022008 9.499E+03 7.607E+06 5.111E+02 2.537E+03 3.803E+06 2.555E+022009 1.030E+04 8.248E+06 5.542E+02 2.751E+03 4.124E+06 2.771E+022010 1.086E+04 8.698E+06 5.844E+02 2.901E+03 4.349E+06 2.922E+022011 1.114E+04 8.924E+06 5.996E+02 2.977E+03 4.462E+06 2.998E+022012 1.102E+04 8.828E+06 5.932E+02 2.945E+03 4.414E+06 2.966E+022013 1.076E+04 8.620E+06 5.791E+02 2.875E+03 4.310E+06 2.896E+022014 9.818E+03 7.862E+06 5.282E+02 2.623E+03 3.931E+06 2.641E+022015 8.955E+03 7.171E+06 4.818E+02 2.392E+03 3.585E+06 2.409E+022016 8.168E+03 6.541E+06 4.395E+02 2.182E+03 3.270E+06 2.197E+022017 7.450E+03 5.966E+06 4.008E+02 1.990E+03 2.983E+06 2.004E+022018 6.795E+03 5.441E+06 3.656E+02 1.815E+03 2.721E+06 1.828E+022019 6.198E+03 4.963E+06 3.335E+02 1.656E+03 2.482E+06 1.667E+022020 5.653E+03 4.527E+06 3.042E+02 1.510E+03 2.263E+06 1.521E+022021 5.156E+03 4.129E+06 2.774E+02 1.377E+03 2.065E+06 1.387E+022022 4.703E+03 3.766E+06 2.530E+02 1.256E+03 1.883E+06 1.265E+022023 4.290E+03 3.435E+06 2.308E+02 1.146E+03 1.718E+06 1.154E+022024 3.913E+03 3.133E+06 2.105E+02 1.045E+03 1.567E+06 1.053E+022025 3.569E+03 2.858E+06 1.920E+02 9.533E+02 1.429E+06 9.601E+012026 3.255E+03 2.607E+06 1.751E+02 8.695E+02 1.303E+06 8.757E+012027 2.969E+03 2.377E+06 1.597E+02 7.931E+02 1.189E+06 7.987E+012028 2.708E+03 2.168E+06 1.457E+02 7.234E+02 1.084E+06 7.285E+012029 2.470E+03 1.978E+06 1.329E+02 6.598E+02 9.889E+05 6.645E+012030 2.253E+03 1.804E+06 1.212E+02 6.018E+02 9.020E+05 6.061E+012031 2.055E+03 1.645E+06 1.106E+02 5.489E+02 8.227E+05 5.528E+012032 1.874E+03 1.501E+06 1.008E+02 5.006E+02 7.504E+05 5.042E+012033 1.710E+03 1.369E+06 9.198E+01 4.566E+02 6.845E+05 4.599E+012034 1.559E+03 1.249E+06 8.389E+01 4.165E+02 6.243E+05 4.195E+012035 1.422E+03 1.139E+06 7.652E+01 3.799E+02 5.694E+05 3.826E+012036 1.297E+03 1.039E+06 6.979E+01 3.465E+02 5.194E+05 3.490E+012037 1.183E+03 9.475E+05 6.366E+01 3.161E+02 4.737E+05 3.183E+012038 1.079E+03 8.642E+05 5.806E+01 2.883E+02 4.321E+05 2.903E+012039 9.844E+02 7.882E+05 5.296E+01 2.629E+02 3.941E+05 2.648E+012040 8.978E+02 7.189E+05 4.831E+01 2.398E+02 3.595E+05 2.415E+01

MethaneTotal landfill gasYear

REPORT - 8

Page 81: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2041 8.189E+02 6.558E+05 4.406E+01 2.187E+02 3.279E+05 2.203E+012042 7.469E+02 5.981E+05 4.019E+01 1.995E+02 2.991E+05 2.009E+012043 6.813E+02 5.455E+05 3.666E+01 1.820E+02 2.728E+05 1.833E+012044 6.214E+02 4.976E+05 3.343E+01 1.660E+02 2.488E+05 1.672E+012045 5.668E+02 4.539E+05 3.049E+01 1.514E+02 2.269E+05 1.525E+012046 5.170E+02 4.140E+05 2.781E+01 1.381E+02 2.070E+05 1.391E+012047 4.715E+02 3.776E+05 2.537E+01 1.260E+02 1.888E+05 1.268E+012048 4.301E+02 3.444E+05 2.314E+01 1.149E+02 1.722E+05 1.157E+012049 3.923E+02 3.141E+05 2.111E+01 1.048E+02 1.571E+05 1.055E+012050 3.578E+02 2.865E+05 1.925E+01 9.557E+01 1.433E+05 9.625E+002051 3.264E+02 2.613E+05 1.756E+01 8.717E+01 1.307E+05 8.779E+002052 2.977E+02 2.384E+05 1.602E+01 7.951E+01 1.192E+05 8.008E+002053 2.715E+02 2.174E+05 1.461E+01 7.252E+01 1.087E+05 7.304E+002054 2.476E+02 1.983E+05 1.332E+01 6.615E+01 9.915E+04 6.662E+002055 2.259E+02 1.809E+05 1.215E+01 6.033E+01 9.044E+04 6.076E+002056 2.060E+02 1.650E+05 1.108E+01 5.503E+01 8.249E+04 5.542E+002057 1.879E+02 1.505E+05 1.011E+01 5.019E+01 7.524E+04 5.055E+002058 1.714E+02 1.372E+05 9.222E+00 4.578E+01 6.862E+04 4.611E+002059 1.563E+02 1.252E+05 8.411E+00 4.176E+01 6.259E+04 4.206E+002060 1.426E+02 1.142E+05 7.672E+00 3.809E+01 5.709E+04 3.836E+002061 1.301E+02 1.041E+05 6.998E+00 3.474E+01 5.207E+04 3.499E+002062 1.186E+02 9.499E+04 6.382E+00 3.169E+01 4.750E+04 3.191E+002063 1.082E+02 8.664E+04 5.822E+00 2.890E+01 4.332E+04 2.911E+002064 9.869E+01 7.903E+04 5.310E+00 2.636E+01 3.951E+04 2.655E+002065 9.002E+01 7.208E+04 4.843E+00 2.404E+01 3.604E+04 2.422E+002066 8.210E+01 6.575E+04 4.417E+00 2.193E+01 3.287E+04 2.209E+002067 7.489E+01 5.997E+04 4.029E+00 2.000E+01 2.998E+04 2.015E+002068 6.831E+01 5.470E+04 3.675E+00 1.825E+01 2.735E+04 1.838E+002069 6.230E+01 4.989E+04 3.352E+00 1.664E+01 2.494E+04 1.676E+002070 5.683E+01 4.550E+04 3.057E+00 1.518E+01 2.275E+04 1.529E+002071 5.183E+01 4.150E+04 2.789E+00 1.384E+01 2.075E+04 1.394E+002072 4.728E+01 3.786E+04 2.544E+00 1.263E+01 1.893E+04 1.272E+002073 4.312E+01 3.453E+04 2.320E+00 1.152E+01 1.726E+04 1.160E+002074 3.933E+01 3.149E+04 2.116E+00 1.051E+01 1.575E+04 1.058E+002075 3.587E+01 2.873E+04 1.930E+00 9.582E+00 1.436E+04 9.650E-012076 3.272E+01 2.620E+04 1.760E+00 8.740E+00 1.310E+04 8.802E-012077 2.984E+01 2.390E+04 1.606E+00 7.972E+00 1.195E+04 8.028E-012078 2.722E+01 2.180E+04 1.465E+00 7.271E+00 1.090E+04 7.323E-012079 2.483E+01 1.988E+04 1.336E+00 6.632E+00 9.941E+03 6.679E-012080 2.265E+01 1.813E+04 1.218E+00 6.049E+00 9.067E+03 6.092E-012081 2.066E+01 1.654E+04 1.111E+00 5.517E+00 8.270E+03 5.557E-012082 1.884E+01 1.509E+04 1.014E+00 5.032E+00 7.543E+03 5.068E-012083 1.718E+01 1.376E+04 9.246E-01 4.590E+00 6.880E+03 4.623E-012084 1.567E+01 1.255E+04 8.433E-01 4.187E+00 6.275E+03 4.216E-012085 1.430E+01 1.145E+04 7.692E-01 3.819E+00 5.724E+03 3.846E-012086 1.304E+01 1.044E+04 7.016E-01 3.483E+00 5.221E+03 3.508E-012087 1.189E+01 9.524E+03 6.399E-01 3.177E+00 4.762E+03 3.200E-012088 1.085E+01 8.687E+03 5.837E-01 2.898E+00 4.343E+03 2.918E-012089 9.895E+00 7.923E+03 5.324E-01 2.643E+00 3.962E+03 2.662E-012090 9.025E+00 7.227E+03 4.856E-01 2.411E+00 3.613E+03 2.428E-012091 8.232E+00 6.592E+03 4.429E-01 2.199E+00 3.296E+03 2.214E-01

Year MethaneTotal landfill gas

REPORT - 9

Page 82: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2092 7.508E+00 6.012E+03 4.040E-01 2.006E+00 3.006E+03 2.020E-012093 6.848E+00 5.484E+03 3.685E-01 1.829E+00 2.742E+03 1.842E-012094 6.246E+00 5.002E+03 3.361E-01 1.668E+00 2.501E+03 1.680E-012095 5.697E+00 4.562E+03 3.065E-01 1.522E+00 2.281E+03 1.533E-012096 5.197E+00 4.161E+03 2.796E-01 1.388E+00 2.081E+03 1.398E-012097 4.740E+00 3.795E+03 2.550E-01 1.266E+00 1.898E+03 1.275E-012098 4.323E+00 3.462E+03 2.326E-01 1.155E+00 1.731E+03 1.163E-012099 3.943E+00 3.158E+03 2.122E-01 1.053E+00 1.579E+03 1.061E-012100 3.597E+00 2.880E+03 1.935E-01 9.607E-01 1.440E+03 9.675E-022101 3.280E+00 2.627E+03 1.765E-01 8.763E-01 1.313E+03 8.825E-022102 2.992E+00 2.396E+03 1.610E-01 7.992E-01 1.198E+03 8.049E-022103 2.729E+00 2.185E+03 1.468E-01 7.290E-01 1.093E+03 7.342E-022104 2.489E+00 1.993E+03 1.339E-01 6.649E-01 9.966E+02 6.696E-022105 2.270E+00 1.818E+03 1.222E-01 6.065E-01 9.090E+02 6.108E-022106 2.071E+00 1.658E+03 1.114E-01 5.532E-01 8.291E+02 5.571E-022107 1.889E+00 1.513E+03 1.016E-01 5.045E-01 7.563E+02 5.081E-022108 1.723E+00 1.380E+03 9.269E-02 4.602E-01 6.898E+02 4.635E-022109 1.571E+00 1.258E+03 8.455E-02 4.197E-01 6.292E+02 4.227E-022110 1.433E+00 1.148E+03 7.712E-02 3.829E-01 5.739E+02 3.856E-022111 1.307E+00 1.047E+03 7.034E-02 3.492E-01 5.234E+02 3.517E-022112 1.192E+00 9.548E+02 6.416E-02 3.185E-01 4.774E+02 3.208E-022113 1.088E+00 8.709E+02 5.852E-02 2.905E-01 4.355E+02 2.926E-022114 9.920E-01 7.944E+02 5.337E-02 2.650E-01 3.972E+02 2.669E-022115 9.048E-01 7.245E+02 4.868E-02 2.417E-01 3.623E+02 2.434E-022116 8.253E-01 6.609E+02 4.440E-02 2.204E-01 3.304E+02 2.220E-022117 7.528E-01 6.028E+02 4.050E-02 2.011E-01 3.014E+02 2.025E-022118 6.866E-01 5.498E+02 3.694E-02 1.834E-01 2.749E+02 1.847E-022119 6.262E-01 5.015E+02 3.369E-02 1.673E-01 2.507E+02 1.685E-022120 5.712E-01 4.574E+02 3.073E-02 1.526E-01 2.287E+02 1.537E-022121 5.210E-01 4.172E+02 2.803E-02 1.392E-01 2.086E+02 1.402E-022122 4.752E-01 3.805E+02 2.557E-02 1.269E-01 1.903E+02 1.278E-022123 4.334E-01 3.471E+02 2.332E-02 1.158E-01 1.735E+02 1.166E-022124 3.953E-01 3.166E+02 2.127E-02 1.056E-01 1.583E+02 1.064E-022125 3.606E-01 2.887E+02 1.940E-02 9.632E-02 1.444E+02 9.700E-032126 3.289E-01 2.634E+02 1.770E-02 8.785E-02 1.317E+02 8.848E-032127 3.000E-01 2.402E+02 1.614E-02 8.013E-02 1.201E+02 8.070E-032128 2.736E-01 2.191E+02 1.472E-02 7.309E-02 1.096E+02 7.361E-032129 2.496E-01 1.998E+02 1.343E-02 6.666E-02 9.992E+01 6.714E-032130 2.276E-01 1.823E+02 1.225E-02 6.080E-02 9.114E+01 6.124E-032131 2.076E-01 1.663E+02 1.117E-02 5.546E-02 8.313E+01 5.585E-03

Year Total landfill gas Methane

REPORT - 10

Page 83: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

Year(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)

1991 0 0 0 0 0 01992 5.156E+02 2.817E+05 1.892E+01 8.077E+00 2.253E+03 1.514E-011993 9.858E+02 5.385E+05 3.618E+01 1.544E+01 4.308E+03 2.895E-011994 1.415E+03 7.729E+05 5.193E+01 2.216E+01 6.183E+03 4.154E-011995 1.806E+03 9.866E+05 6.629E+01 2.829E+01 7.893E+03 5.303E-011996 2.367E+03 1.293E+06 8.687E+01 3.708E+01 1.034E+04 6.950E-011997 2.763E+03 1.510E+06 1.014E+02 4.329E+01 1.208E+04 8.115E-011998 2.945E+03 1.609E+06 1.081E+02 4.613E+01 1.287E+04 8.648E-011999 3.179E+03 1.737E+06 1.167E+02 4.980E+01 1.389E+04 9.335E-012000 3.421E+03 1.869E+06 1.256E+02 5.359E+01 1.495E+04 1.005E+002001 3.651E+03 1.994E+06 1.340E+02 5.719E+01 1.596E+04 1.072E+002002 4.029E+03 2.201E+06 1.479E+02 6.311E+01 1.761E+04 1.183E+002003 4.399E+03 2.403E+06 1.615E+02 6.891E+01 1.923E+04 1.292E+002004 4.767E+03 2.604E+06 1.750E+02 7.468E+01 2.083E+04 1.400E+002005 5.247E+03 2.867E+06 1.926E+02 8.220E+01 2.293E+04 1.541E+002006 5.696E+03 3.112E+06 2.091E+02 8.924E+01 2.490E+04 1.673E+002007 6.383E+03 3.487E+06 2.343E+02 1.000E+02 2.790E+04 1.874E+002008 6.962E+03 3.803E+06 2.555E+02 1.091E+02 3.043E+04 2.044E+002009 7.549E+03 4.124E+06 2.771E+02 1.183E+02 3.299E+04 2.217E+002010 7.961E+03 4.349E+06 2.922E+02 1.247E+02 3.479E+04 2.338E+002011 8.168E+03 4.462E+06 2.998E+02 1.280E+02 3.570E+04 2.399E+002012 8.080E+03 4.414E+06 2.966E+02 1.266E+02 3.531E+04 2.373E+002013 7.889E+03 4.310E+06 2.896E+02 1.236E+02 3.448E+04 2.317E+002014 7.196E+03 3.931E+06 2.641E+02 1.127E+02 3.145E+04 2.113E+002015 6.563E+03 3.585E+06 2.409E+02 1.028E+02 2.868E+04 1.927E+002016 5.986E+03 3.270E+06 2.197E+02 9.378E+01 2.616E+04 1.758E+002017 5.460E+03 2.983E+06 2.004E+02 8.554E+01 2.386E+04 1.603E+002018 4.980E+03 2.721E+06 1.828E+02 7.802E+01 2.177E+04 1.462E+002019 4.542E+03 2.482E+06 1.667E+02 7.116E+01 1.985E+04 1.334E+002020 4.143E+03 2.263E+06 1.521E+02 6.491E+01 1.811E+04 1.217E+002021 3.779E+03 2.065E+06 1.387E+02 5.920E+01 1.652E+04 1.110E+002022 3.447E+03 1.883E+06 1.265E+02 5.400E+01 1.506E+04 1.012E+002023 3.144E+03 1.718E+06 1.154E+02 4.925E+01 1.374E+04 9.232E-012024 2.868E+03 1.567E+06 1.053E+02 4.492E+01 1.253E+04 8.421E-012025 2.616E+03 1.429E+06 9.601E+01 4.097E+01 1.143E+04 7.680E-012026 2.386E+03 1.303E+06 8.757E+01 3.737E+01 1.043E+04 7.005E-012027 2.176E+03 1.189E+06 7.987E+01 3.409E+01 9.510E+03 6.390E-012028 1.985E+03 1.084E+06 7.285E+01 3.109E+01 8.674E+03 5.828E-012029 1.810E+03 9.889E+05 6.645E+01 2.836E+01 7.912E+03 5.316E-012030 1.651E+03 9.020E+05 6.061E+01 2.587E+01 7.216E+03 4.849E-012031 1.506E+03 8.227E+05 5.528E+01 2.359E+01 6.582E+03 4.422E-012032 1.374E+03 7.504E+05 5.042E+01 2.152E+01 6.003E+03 4.034E-012033 1.253E+03 6.845E+05 4.599E+01 1.963E+01 5.476E+03 3.679E-012034 1.143E+03 6.243E+05 4.195E+01 1.790E+01 4.994E+03 3.356E-012035 1.042E+03 5.694E+05 3.826E+01 1.633E+01 4.555E+03 3.061E-012036 9.507E+02 5.194E+05 3.490E+01 1.489E+01 4.155E+03 2.792E-012037 8.672E+02 4.737E+05 3.183E+01 1.358E+01 3.790E+03 2.546E-012038 7.909E+02 4.321E+05 2.903E+01 1.239E+01 3.457E+03 2.323E-012039 7.214E+02 3.941E+05 2.648E+01 1.130E+01 3.153E+03 2.118E-012040 6.580E+02 3.595E+05 2.415E+01 1.031E+01 2.876E+03 1.932E-01

NMOCCarbon dioxide

REPORT - 11

Page 84: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2041 6.002E+02 3.279E+05 2.203E+01 9.402E+00 2.623E+03 1.762E-012042 5.474E+02 2.991E+05 2.009E+01 8.576E+00 2.392E+03 1.608E-012043 4.993E+02 2.728E+05 1.833E+01 7.822E+00 2.182E+03 1.466E-012044 4.554E+02 2.488E+05 1.672E+01 7.134E+00 1.990E+03 1.337E-012045 4.154E+02 2.269E+05 1.525E+01 6.507E+00 1.815E+03 1.220E-012046 3.789E+02 2.070E+05 1.391E+01 5.935E+00 1.656E+03 1.113E-012047 3.456E+02 1.888E+05 1.268E+01 5.414E+00 1.510E+03 1.015E-012048 3.152E+02 1.722E+05 1.157E+01 4.938E+00 1.378E+03 9.256E-022049 2.875E+02 1.571E+05 1.055E+01 4.504E+00 1.256E+03 8.442E-022050 2.622E+02 1.433E+05 9.625E+00 4.108E+00 1.146E+03 7.700E-022051 2.392E+02 1.307E+05 8.779E+00 3.747E+00 1.045E+03 7.024E-022052 2.182E+02 1.192E+05 8.008E+00 3.418E+00 9.534E+02 6.406E-022053 1.990E+02 1.087E+05 7.304E+00 3.117E+00 8.696E+02 5.843E-022054 1.815E+02 9.915E+04 6.662E+00 2.843E+00 7.932E+02 5.330E-022055 1.655E+02 9.044E+04 6.076E+00 2.593E+00 7.235E+02 4.861E-022056 1.510E+02 8.249E+04 5.542E+00 2.365E+00 6.599E+02 4.434E-022057 1.377E+02 7.524E+04 5.055E+00 2.157E+00 6.019E+02 4.044E-022058 1.256E+02 6.862E+04 4.611E+00 1.968E+00 5.490E+02 3.689E-022059 1.146E+02 6.259E+04 4.206E+00 1.795E+00 5.007E+02 3.364E-022060 1.045E+02 5.709E+04 3.836E+00 1.637E+00 4.567E+02 3.069E-022061 9.532E+01 5.207E+04 3.499E+00 1.493E+00 4.166E+02 2.799E-022062 8.694E+01 4.750E+04 3.191E+00 1.362E+00 3.800E+02 2.553E-022063 7.930E+01 4.332E+04 2.911E+00 1.242E+00 3.466E+02 2.329E-022064 7.233E+01 3.951E+04 2.655E+00 1.133E+00 3.161E+02 2.124E-022065 6.597E+01 3.604E+04 2.422E+00 1.033E+00 2.883E+02 1.937E-022066 6.017E+01 3.287E+04 2.209E+00 9.426E-01 2.630E+02 1.767E-022067 5.488E+01 2.998E+04 2.015E+00 8.598E-01 2.399E+02 1.612E-022068 5.006E+01 2.735E+04 1.838E+00 7.842E-01 2.188E+02 1.470E-022069 4.566E+01 2.494E+04 1.676E+00 7.153E-01 1.996E+02 1.341E-022070 4.165E+01 2.275E+04 1.529E+00 6.524E-01 1.820E+02 1.223E-022071 3.799E+01 2.075E+04 1.394E+00 5.951E-01 1.660E+02 1.115E-022072 3.465E+01 1.893E+04 1.272E+00 5.428E-01 1.514E+02 1.017E-022073 3.160E+01 1.726E+04 1.160E+00 4.951E-01 1.381E+02 9.280E-032074 2.882E+01 1.575E+04 1.058E+00 4.516E-01 1.260E+02 8.464E-032075 2.629E+01 1.436E+04 9.650E-01 4.119E-01 1.149E+02 7.720E-032076 2.398E+01 1.310E+04 8.802E-01 3.757E-01 1.048E+02 7.042E-032077 2.187E+01 1.195E+04 8.028E-01 3.426E-01 9.559E+01 6.423E-032078 1.995E+01 1.090E+04 7.323E-01 3.125E-01 8.719E+01 5.858E-032079 1.820E+01 9.941E+03 6.679E-01 2.851E-01 7.953E+01 5.343E-032080 1.660E+01 9.067E+03 6.092E-01 2.600E-01 7.254E+01 4.874E-032081 1.514E+01 8.270E+03 5.557E-01 2.372E-01 6.616E+01 4.445E-032082 1.381E+01 7.543E+03 5.068E-01 2.163E-01 6.035E+01 4.055E-032083 1.259E+01 6.880E+03 4.623E-01 1.973E-01 5.504E+01 3.698E-032084 1.149E+01 6.275E+03 4.216E-01 1.800E-01 5.020E+01 3.373E-032085 1.048E+01 5.724E+03 3.846E-01 1.641E-01 4.579E+01 3.077E-032086 9.557E+00 5.221E+03 3.508E-01 1.497E-01 4.177E+01 2.806E-032087 8.717E+00 4.762E+03 3.200E-01 1.366E-01 3.810E+01 2.560E-032088 7.950E+00 4.343E+03 2.918E-01 1.245E-01 3.475E+01 2.335E-032089 7.252E+00 3.962E+03 2.662E-01 1.136E-01 3.169E+01 2.129E-032090 6.614E+00 3.613E+03 2.428E-01 1.036E-01 2.891E+01 1.942E-032091 6.033E+00 3.296E+03 2.214E-01 9.451E-02 2.637E+01 1.772E-03

Carbon dioxideYear NMOC

REPORT - 12

Page 85: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final SCS.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2092 5.503E+00 3.006E+03 2.020E-01 8.620E-02 2.405E+01 1.616E-032093 5.019E+00 2.742E+03 1.842E-01 7.863E-02 2.194E+01 1.474E-032094 4.578E+00 2.501E+03 1.680E-01 7.171E-02 2.001E+01 1.344E-032095 4.175E+00 2.281E+03 1.533E-01 6.541E-02 1.825E+01 1.226E-032096 3.808E+00 2.081E+03 1.398E-01 5.966E-02 1.664E+01 1.118E-032097 3.474E+00 1.898E+03 1.275E-01 5.442E-02 1.518E+01 1.020E-032098 3.168E+00 1.731E+03 1.163E-01 4.963E-02 1.385E+01 9.304E-042099 2.890E+00 1.579E+03 1.061E-01 4.527E-02 1.263E+01 8.486E-042100 2.636E+00 1.440E+03 9.675E-02 4.129E-02 1.152E+01 7.740E-042101 2.404E+00 1.313E+03 8.825E-02 3.766E-02 1.051E+01 7.060E-042102 2.193E+00 1.198E+03 8.049E-02 3.435E-02 9.584E+00 6.439E-042103 2.000E+00 1.093E+03 7.342E-02 3.133E-02 8.742E+00 5.873E-042104 1.824E+00 9.966E+02 6.696E-02 2.858E-02 7.973E+00 5.357E-042105 1.664E+00 9.090E+02 6.108E-02 2.607E-02 7.272E+00 4.886E-042106 1.518E+00 8.291E+02 5.571E-02 2.378E-02 6.633E+00 4.457E-042107 1.384E+00 7.563E+02 5.081E-02 2.169E-02 6.050E+00 4.065E-042108 1.263E+00 6.898E+02 4.635E-02 1.978E-02 5.518E+00 3.708E-042109 1.152E+00 6.292E+02 4.227E-02 1.804E-02 5.033E+00 3.382E-042110 1.050E+00 5.739E+02 3.856E-02 1.646E-02 4.591E+00 3.085E-042111 9.581E-01 5.234E+02 3.517E-02 1.501E-02 4.187E+00 2.814E-042112 8.739E-01 4.774E+02 3.208E-02 1.369E-02 3.819E+00 2.566E-042113 7.971E-01 4.355E+02 2.926E-02 1.249E-02 3.484E+00 2.341E-042114 7.270E-01 3.972E+02 2.669E-02 1.139E-02 3.177E+00 2.135E-042115 6.631E-01 3.623E+02 2.434E-02 1.039E-02 2.898E+00 1.947E-042116 6.049E-01 3.304E+02 2.220E-02 9.475E-03 2.643E+00 1.776E-042117 5.517E-01 3.014E+02 2.025E-02 8.643E-03 2.411E+00 1.620E-042118 5.032E-01 2.749E+02 1.847E-02 7.883E-03 2.199E+00 1.478E-042119 4.590E-01 2.507E+02 1.685E-02 7.190E-03 2.006E+00 1.348E-042120 4.186E-01 2.287E+02 1.537E-02 6.558E-03 1.830E+00 1.229E-042121 3.818E-01 2.086E+02 1.402E-02 5.982E-03 1.669E+00 1.121E-042122 3.483E-01 1.903E+02 1.278E-02 5.456E-03 1.522E+00 1.023E-042123 3.177E-01 1.735E+02 1.166E-02 4.976E-03 1.388E+00 9.328E-052124 2.897E-01 1.583E+02 1.064E-02 4.539E-03 1.266E+00 8.508E-052125 2.643E-01 1.444E+02 9.700E-03 4.140E-03 1.155E+00 7.760E-052126 2.410E-01 1.317E+02 8.848E-03 3.776E-03 1.053E+00 7.078E-052127 2.199E-01 1.201E+02 8.070E-03 3.444E-03 9.609E-01 6.456E-052128 2.005E-01 1.096E+02 7.361E-03 3.141E-03 8.764E-01 5.889E-052129 1.829E-01 9.992E+01 6.714E-03 2.865E-03 7.994E-01 5.371E-052130 1.668E-01 9.114E+01 6.124E-03 2.614E-03 7.291E-01 4.899E-052131 1.522E-01 8.313E+01 5.585E-03 2.384E-03 6.650E-01 4.468E-05

NMOCYear Carbon dioxide

REPORT - 13

Page 86: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Clean Air Act (CAA) Defaults

Page 87: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Summary ReportLandfill Name or Identifier: Nabors Landfill

Date:

First-Order Decomposition Rate Equation:

Where,QCH4 = annual methane generation in the year of the calculation (m 3 /year )i = 1-year time increment Mi = mass of waste accepted in the ith year (Mg ) n = (year of the calculation) - (initial year of waste acceptance)j = 0.1-year time incrementk = methane generation rate (year -1 )Lo = potential methane generation capacity (m 3 /Mg )

tij = age of the jth section of waste mass Mi accepted in the ith year (decimal years , e.g., 3.2 years)

LandGEM is considered a screening tool — the better the input data, the better the estimates. Often, there are limitations with the available data regarding waste quantity and composition, variation in design and operating practices over time, and changes occurring over time that impact the emissions potential. Changes to landfill operation, such as operating under wet conditions through leachate recirculation or other liquid additions, will result in generating more gas at a faster rate. Defaults for estimating emissions for this type of operation are being developed to include in LandGEM along with defaults for convential landfills (no leachate or liquid additions) for developing emission inventories and determining CAA applicability. Refer to the Web site identified above for future updates.

Thursday, February 19, 2015

LandGEM is based on a first-order decomposition rate equation for quantifying emissions from the decomposition of landfilled waste in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The software provides a relatively simple approach to estimating landfill gas emissions. Model defaults are based on empirical data from U.S. landfills. Field test data can also be used in place of model defaults when available. Further guidance on EPA test methods, Clean Air Act (CAA) regulations, and other guidance regarding landfill gas emissions and control technology requirements can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/landfill/landflpg.html.

Description/Comments:

About LandGEM:

REPORT - 1

Page 88: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Input Review

LANDFILL CHARACTERISTICSLandfill Open Year 1991Landfill Closure Year (with 80-year limit) 2012Actual Closure Year (without limit) 2012Have Model Calculate Closure Year? NoWaste Design Capacity megagrams

MODEL PARAMETERSMethane Generation Rate, k 0.050 year -1

Potential Methane Generation Capacity, Lo 170 m 3 /MgNMOC Concentration 4,000 ppmv as hexaneMethane Content 50 % by volume

GASES / POLLUTANTS SELECTEDGas / Pollutant #1: Total landfill gasGas / Pollutant #2: MethaneGas / Pollutant #3: Carbon dioxideGas / Pollutant #4: NMOC

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES

(Mg/year) (short tons/year) (Mg) (short tons)1991 34,078 37,486 0 01992 34,078 37,486 34,078 37,4861993 34,078 37,486 68,156 74,9721994 34,078 37,486 102,235 112,4581995 47,555 52,311 136,313 149,9441996 39,976 43,974 183,868 202,2551997 28,055 30,861 223,845 246,2291998 32,582 35,840 251,900 277,0901999 34,468 37,915 284,482 312,9302000 35,055 38,560 318,950 350,8452001 46,205 50,825 354,005 389,4052002 47,877 52,665 400,209 440,2302003 49,870 54,857 448,086 492,8952004 59,437 65,381 497,956 547,7522005 60,185 66,203 557,394 613,1332006 78,498 86,348 617,578 679,3362007 75,335 82,868 696,076 765,6842008 79,233 87,156 771,411 848,5522009 71,079 78,187 850,644 935,7082010 59,958 65,954 921,723 1,013,8952011 41,633 45,796 981,681 1,079,8492012 34,325 37,757 1,023,314 1,125,6452013 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022014 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022015 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022016 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022017 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022018 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022019 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022020 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022021 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022022 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022023 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022024 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022025 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022026 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022027 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022028 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022029 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022030 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,402

Year Waste Accepted Waste-In-Place

REPORT - 2

Page 89: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES (Continued)

(Mg/year) (short tons/year) (Mg) (short tons)2031 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022032 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022033 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022034 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022035 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022036 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022037 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022038 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022039 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022040 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022041 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022042 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022043 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022044 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022045 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022046 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022047 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022048 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022049 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022050 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022051 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022052 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022053 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022054 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022055 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022056 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022057 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022058 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022059 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022060 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022061 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022062 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022063 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022064 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022065 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022066 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022067 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022068 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022069 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022070 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,402

Year Waste Accepted Waste-In-Place

REPORT - 3

Page 90: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Pollutant Parameters

Concentration ConcentrationCompound (ppmv ) Molecular Weight (ppmv ) Molecular Weight

Total landfill gas 0.00Methane 16.04Carbon dioxide 44.01NMOC 4,000 86.181,1,1-Trichloroethane (methyl chloroform) - HAP 0.48 133.411,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - HAP/VOC 1.1 167.851,1-Dichloroethane (ethylidene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 2.4 98.971,1-Dichloroethene (vinylidene chloride) - HAP/VOC 0.20 96.941,2-Dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 0.41 98.961,2-Dichloropropane (propylene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 0.18 112.992-Propanol (isopropyl alcohol) - VOC 50 60.11Acetone 7.0 58.08

Acrylonitrile - HAP/VOC 6.3 53.06Benzene - No or Unknown Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 1.9 78.11Benzene - Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 11 78.11Bromodichloromethane - VOC 3.1 163.83Butane - VOC 5.0 58.12Carbon disulfide - HAP/VOC 0.58 76.13Carbon monoxide 140 28.01Carbon tetrachloride - HAP/VOC 4.0E-03 153.84Carbonyl sulfide - HAP/VOC 0.49 60.07Chlorobenzene - HAP/VOC 0.25 112.56Chlorodifluoromethane 1.3 86.47Chloroethane (ethyl chloride) - HAP/VOC 1.3 64.52Chloroform - HAP/VOC 0.03 119.39Chloromethane - VOC 1.2 50.49

Dichlorobenzene - (HAP for para isomer/VOC) 0.21 147

Dichlorodifluoromethane 16 120.91Dichlorofluoromethane - VOC 2.6 102.92Dichloromethane (methylene chloride) - HAP 14 84.94Dimethyl sulfide (methyl sulfide) - VOC 7.8 62.13Ethane 890 30.07Ethanol - VOC 27 46.08

Gas / Pollutant Default Parameters:

Pollu

tant

s

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:

Gas

es

REPORT - 4

Page 91: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Pollutant Parameters (Continued)

Concentration ConcentrationCompound (ppmv ) Molecular Weight (ppmv ) Molecular Weight

Ethyl mercaptan (ethanethiol) - VOC 2.3 62.13Ethylbenzene - HAP/VOC 4.6 106.16Ethylene dibromide - HAP/VOC 1.0E-03 187.88Fluorotrichloromethane - VOC 0.76 137.38Hexane - HAP/VOC 6.6 86.18Hydrogen sulfide 36 34.08Mercury (total) - HAP 2.9E-04 200.61Methyl ethyl ketone - HAP/VOC 7.1 72.11Methyl isobutyl ketone - HAP/VOC 1.9 100.16

Methyl mercaptan - VOC 2.5 48.11Pentane - VOC 3.3 72.15Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) - HAP 3.7 165.83Propane - VOC 11 44.09t-1,2-Dichloroethene - VOC 2.8 96.94Toluene - No or Unknown Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 39 92.13Toluene - Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 170 92.13Trichloroethylene (trichloroethene) - HAP/VOC 2.8 131.40Vinyl chloride - HAP/VOC 7.3 62.50Xylenes - HAP/VOC 12 106.16

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:Gas / Pollutant Default Parameters:

Pollu

tant

s

REPORT - 5

Page 92: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

REPORT - 6

Page 93: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Graphs

0.000E+00

2.000E+03

4.000E+03

6.000E+03

8.000E+03

1.000E+04

1.200E+04

1.400E+04

1.600E+04

Emis

sion

s

Year

Megagrams Per Year

Total landfill gas Methane Carbon dioxide NMOC

0.000E+00

2.000E+06

4.000E+06

6.000E+06

8.000E+06

1.000E+07

1.200E+07

1.400E+07

Emis

sion

s

Year

Cubic Meters Per Year

Total landfill gas Methane Carbon dioxide NMOC

0.000E+001.000E+022.000E+023.000E+024.000E+025.000E+026.000E+027.000E+028.000E+029.000E+02

Emis

sion

s

Year

User-specified Unit (units shown in legend below)

Total landfill gas (av ft^3/min) Methane (av ft^3/min)

Carbon dioxide (av ft^3/min) NMOC (av ft^3/min)

REPORT - 7

Page 94: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Results

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)1991 0 0 0 0 0 01992 7.075E+02 5.665E+05 3.806E+01 1.890E+02 2.832E+05 1.903E+011993 1.380E+03 1.105E+06 7.427E+01 3.687E+02 5.527E+05 3.713E+011994 2.021E+03 1.618E+06 1.087E+02 5.397E+02 8.090E+05 5.436E+011995 2.629E+03 2.106E+06 1.415E+02 7.024E+02 1.053E+06 7.074E+011996 3.488E+03 2.793E+06 1.877E+02 9.318E+02 1.397E+06 9.384E+011997 4.148E+03 3.322E+06 2.232E+02 1.108E+03 1.661E+06 1.116E+021998 4.528E+03 3.626E+06 2.436E+02 1.210E+03 1.813E+06 1.218E+021999 4.984E+03 3.991E+06 2.681E+02 1.331E+03 1.995E+06 1.341E+022000 5.456E+03 4.369E+06 2.936E+02 1.457E+03 2.185E+06 1.468E+022001 5.918E+03 4.739E+06 3.184E+02 1.581E+03 2.369E+06 1.592E+022002 6.589E+03 5.276E+06 3.545E+02 1.760E+03 2.638E+06 1.772E+022003 7.261E+03 5.814E+06 3.907E+02 1.940E+03 2.907E+06 1.953E+022004 7.942E+03 6.360E+06 4.273E+02 2.121E+03 3.180E+06 2.137E+022005 8.789E+03 7.038E+06 4.729E+02 2.348E+03 3.519E+06 2.364E+022006 9.610E+03 7.695E+06 5.170E+02 2.567E+03 3.847E+06 2.585E+022007 1.077E+04 8.625E+06 5.795E+02 2.877E+03 4.312E+06 2.897E+022008 1.181E+04 9.456E+06 6.354E+02 3.154E+03 4.728E+06 3.177E+022009 1.288E+04 1.031E+07 6.929E+02 3.440E+03 5.156E+06 3.464E+022010 1.373E+04 1.099E+07 7.385E+02 3.666E+03 5.495E+06 3.692E+022011 1.430E+04 1.145E+07 7.694E+02 3.820E+03 5.726E+06 3.847E+022012 1.447E+04 1.159E+07 7.784E+02 3.865E+03 5.793E+06 3.892E+022013 1.447E+04 1.159E+07 7.788E+02 3.866E+03 5.795E+06 3.894E+022014 1.377E+04 1.103E+07 7.408E+02 3.678E+03 5.513E+06 3.704E+022015 1.310E+04 1.049E+07 7.047E+02 3.498E+03 5.244E+06 3.523E+022016 1.246E+04 9.976E+06 6.703E+02 3.328E+03 4.988E+06 3.352E+022017 1.185E+04 9.490E+06 6.376E+02 3.166E+03 4.745E+06 3.188E+022018 1.127E+04 9.027E+06 6.065E+02 3.011E+03 4.513E+06 3.033E+022019 1.072E+04 8.587E+06 5.769E+02 2.864E+03 4.293E+06 2.885E+022020 1.020E+04 8.168E+06 5.488E+02 2.725E+03 4.084E+06 2.744E+022021 9.703E+03 7.769E+06 5.220E+02 2.592E+03 3.885E+06 2.610E+022022 9.230E+03 7.391E+06 4.966E+02 2.465E+03 3.695E+06 2.483E+022023 8.779E+03 7.030E+06 4.724E+02 2.345E+03 3.515E+06 2.362E+022024 8.351E+03 6.687E+06 4.493E+02 2.231E+03 3.344E+06 2.247E+022025 7.944E+03 6.361E+06 4.274E+02 2.122E+03 3.181E+06 2.137E+022026 7.556E+03 6.051E+06 4.066E+02 2.018E+03 3.025E+06 2.033E+022027 7.188E+03 5.756E+06 3.867E+02 1.920E+03 2.878E+06 1.934E+022028 6.837E+03 5.475E+06 3.679E+02 1.826E+03 2.738E+06 1.839E+022029 6.504E+03 5.208E+06 3.499E+02 1.737E+03 2.604E+06 1.750E+022030 6.187E+03 4.954E+06 3.329E+02 1.653E+03 2.477E+06 1.664E+022031 5.885E+03 4.712E+06 3.166E+02 1.572E+03 2.356E+06 1.583E+022032 5.598E+03 4.483E+06 3.012E+02 1.495E+03 2.241E+06 1.506E+022033 5.325E+03 4.264E+06 2.865E+02 1.422E+03 2.132E+06 1.432E+022034 5.065E+03 4.056E+06 2.725E+02 1.353E+03 2.028E+06 1.363E+022035 4.818E+03 3.858E+06 2.592E+02 1.287E+03 1.929E+06 1.296E+022036 4.583E+03 3.670E+06 2.466E+02 1.224E+03 1.835E+06 1.233E+022037 4.360E+03 3.491E+06 2.346E+02 1.165E+03 1.746E+06 1.173E+022038 4.147E+03 3.321E+06 2.231E+02 1.108E+03 1.660E+06 1.116E+022039 3.945E+03 3.159E+06 2.122E+02 1.054E+03 1.579E+06 1.061E+022040 3.752E+03 3.005E+06 2.019E+02 1.002E+03 1.502E+06 1.009E+02

Year Total landfill gas Methane

REPORT - 8

Page 95: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2041 3.569E+03 2.858E+06 1.920E+02 9.534E+02 1.429E+06 9.602E+012042 3.395E+03 2.719E+06 1.827E+02 9.069E+02 1.359E+06 9.134E+012043 3.230E+03 2.586E+06 1.738E+02 8.627E+02 1.293E+06 8.688E+012044 3.072E+03 2.460E+06 1.653E+02 8.206E+02 1.230E+06 8.265E+012045 2.922E+03 2.340E+06 1.572E+02 7.806E+02 1.170E+06 7.862E+012046 2.780E+03 2.226E+06 1.496E+02 7.425E+02 1.113E+06 7.478E+012047 2.644E+03 2.117E+06 1.423E+02 7.063E+02 1.059E+06 7.114E+012048 2.515E+03 2.014E+06 1.353E+02 6.719E+02 1.007E+06 6.767E+012049 2.393E+03 1.916E+06 1.287E+02 6.391E+02 9.580E+05 6.437E+012050 2.276E+03 1.822E+06 1.225E+02 6.079E+02 9.112E+05 6.123E+012051 2.165E+03 1.734E+06 1.165E+02 5.783E+02 8.668E+05 5.824E+012052 2.059E+03 1.649E+06 1.108E+02 5.501E+02 8.245E+05 5.540E+012053 1.959E+03 1.569E+06 1.054E+02 5.233E+02 7.843E+05 5.270E+012054 1.863E+03 1.492E+06 1.003E+02 4.977E+02 7.461E+05 5.013E+012055 1.773E+03 1.419E+06 9.537E+01 4.735E+02 7.097E+05 4.768E+012056 1.686E+03 1.350E+06 9.072E+01 4.504E+02 6.751E+05 4.536E+012057 1.604E+03 1.284E+06 8.629E+01 4.284E+02 6.421E+05 4.315E+012058 1.526E+03 1.222E+06 8.208E+01 4.075E+02 6.108E+05 4.104E+012059 1.451E+03 1.162E+06 7.808E+01 3.876E+02 5.810E+05 3.904E+012060 1.380E+03 1.105E+06 7.427E+01 3.687E+02 5.527E+05 3.714E+012061 1.313E+03 1.051E+06 7.065E+01 3.507E+02 5.257E+05 3.532E+012062 1.249E+03 1.000E+06 6.720E+01 3.336E+02 5.001E+05 3.360E+012063 1.188E+03 9.514E+05 6.393E+01 3.174E+02 4.757E+05 3.196E+012064 1.130E+03 9.050E+05 6.081E+01 3.019E+02 4.525E+05 3.040E+012065 1.075E+03 8.609E+05 5.784E+01 2.872E+02 4.304E+05 2.892E+012066 1.023E+03 8.189E+05 5.502E+01 2.732E+02 4.094E+05 2.751E+012067 9.728E+02 7.790E+05 5.234E+01 2.598E+02 3.895E+05 2.617E+012068 9.253E+02 7.410E+05 4.979E+01 2.472E+02 3.705E+05 2.489E+012069 8.802E+02 7.048E+05 4.736E+01 2.351E+02 3.524E+05 2.368E+012070 8.373E+02 6.705E+05 4.505E+01 2.236E+02 3.352E+05 2.252E+012071 7.964E+02 6.378E+05 4.285E+01 2.127E+02 3.189E+05 2.143E+012072 7.576E+02 6.067E+05 4.076E+01 2.024E+02 3.033E+05 2.038E+012073 7.207E+02 5.771E+05 3.877E+01 1.925E+02 2.885E+05 1.939E+012074 6.855E+02 5.489E+05 3.688E+01 1.831E+02 2.745E+05 1.844E+012075 6.521E+02 5.222E+05 3.508E+01 1.742E+02 2.611E+05 1.754E+012076 6.203E+02 4.967E+05 3.337E+01 1.657E+02 2.483E+05 1.669E+012077 5.900E+02 4.725E+05 3.174E+01 1.576E+02 2.362E+05 1.587E+012078 5.612E+02 4.494E+05 3.020E+01 1.499E+02 2.247E+05 1.510E+012079 5.339E+02 4.275E+05 2.872E+01 1.426E+02 2.138E+05 1.436E+012080 5.078E+02 4.067E+05 2.732E+01 1.356E+02 2.033E+05 1.366E+012081 4.831E+02 3.868E+05 2.599E+01 1.290E+02 1.934E+05 1.300E+012082 4.595E+02 3.680E+05 2.472E+01 1.227E+02 1.840E+05 1.236E+012083 4.371E+02 3.500E+05 2.352E+01 1.168E+02 1.750E+05 1.176E+012084 4.158E+02 3.329E+05 2.237E+01 1.111E+02 1.665E+05 1.119E+012085 3.955E+02 3.167E+05 2.128E+01 1.056E+02 1.584E+05 1.064E+012086 3.762E+02 3.013E+05 2.024E+01 1.005E+02 1.506E+05 1.012E+012087 3.579E+02 2.866E+05 1.925E+01 9.559E+01 1.433E+05 9.627E+002088 3.404E+02 2.726E+05 1.832E+01 9.093E+01 1.363E+05 9.158E+002089 3.238E+02 2.593E+05 1.742E+01 8.649E+01 1.296E+05 8.711E+002090 3.080E+02 2.466E+05 1.657E+01 8.228E+01 1.233E+05 8.286E+002091 2.930E+02 2.346E+05 1.576E+01 7.826E+01 1.173E+05 7.882E+00

Total landfill gasYear Methane

REPORT - 9

Page 96: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2092 2.787E+02 2.232E+05 1.500E+01 7.445E+01 1.116E+05 7.498E+002093 2.651E+02 2.123E+05 1.426E+01 7.081E+01 1.061E+05 7.132E+002094 2.522E+02 2.019E+05 1.357E+01 6.736E+01 1.010E+05 6.784E+002095 2.399E+02 1.921E+05 1.291E+01 6.408E+01 9.604E+04 6.453E+002096 2.282E+02 1.827E+05 1.228E+01 6.095E+01 9.136E+04 6.138E+002097 2.171E+02 1.738E+05 1.168E+01 5.798E+01 8.690E+04 5.839E+002098 2.065E+02 1.653E+05 1.111E+01 5.515E+01 8.267E+04 5.554E+002099 1.964E+02 1.573E+05 1.057E+01 5.246E+01 7.863E+04 5.283E+002100 1.868E+02 1.496E+05 1.005E+01 4.990E+01 7.480E+04 5.026E+002101 1.777E+02 1.423E+05 9.561E+00 4.747E+01 7.115E+04 4.781E+002102 1.690E+02 1.354E+05 9.095E+00 4.515E+01 6.768E+04 4.548E+002103 1.608E+02 1.288E+05 8.651E+00 4.295E+01 6.438E+04 4.326E+002104 1.530E+02 1.225E+05 8.230E+00 4.086E+01 6.124E+04 4.115E+002105 1.455E+02 1.165E+05 7.828E+00 3.886E+01 5.825E+04 3.914E+002106 1.384E+02 1.108E+05 7.446E+00 3.697E+01 5.541E+04 3.723E+002107 1.317E+02 1.054E+05 7.083E+00 3.517E+01 5.271E+04 3.542E+002108 1.252E+02 1.003E+05 6.738E+00 3.345E+01 5.014E+04 3.369E+002109 1.191E+02 9.539E+04 6.409E+00 3.182E+01 4.769E+04 3.205E+002110 1.133E+02 9.074E+04 6.097E+00 3.027E+01 4.537E+04 3.048E+002111 1.078E+02 8.631E+04 5.799E+00 2.879E+01 4.316E+04 2.900E+002112 1.025E+02 8.210E+04 5.516E+00 2.739E+01 4.105E+04 2.758E+002113 9.753E+01 7.810E+04 5.247E+00 2.605E+01 3.905E+04 2.624E+002114 9.277E+01 7.429E+04 4.991E+00 2.478E+01 3.714E+04 2.496E+002115 8.825E+01 7.067E+04 4.748E+00 2.357E+01 3.533E+04 2.374E+002116 8.394E+01 6.722E+04 4.516E+00 2.242E+01 3.361E+04 2.258E+002117 7.985E+01 6.394E+04 4.296E+00 2.133E+01 3.197E+04 2.148E+002118 7.596E+01 6.082E+04 4.087E+00 2.029E+01 3.041E+04 2.043E+002119 7.225E+01 5.786E+04 3.887E+00 1.930E+01 2.893E+04 1.944E+002120 6.873E+01 5.503E+04 3.698E+00 1.836E+01 2.752E+04 1.849E+002121 6.538E+01 5.235E+04 3.517E+00 1.746E+01 2.618E+04 1.759E+002122 6.219E+01 4.980E+04 3.346E+00 1.661E+01 2.490E+04 1.673E+002123 5.916E+01 4.737E+04 3.183E+00 1.580E+01 2.368E+04 1.591E+002124 5.627E+01 4.506E+04 3.027E+00 1.503E+01 2.253E+04 1.514E+002125 5.353E+01 4.286E+04 2.880E+00 1.430E+01 2.143E+04 1.440E+002126 5.092E+01 4.077E+04 2.739E+00 1.360E+01 2.039E+04 1.370E+002127 4.843E+01 3.878E+04 2.606E+00 1.294E+01 1.939E+04 1.303E+002128 4.607E+01 3.689E+04 2.479E+00 1.231E+01 1.845E+04 1.239E+002129 4.382E+01 3.509E+04 2.358E+00 1.171E+01 1.755E+04 1.179E+002130 4.169E+01 3.338E+04 2.243E+00 1.113E+01 1.669E+04 1.121E+002131 3.965E+01 3.175E+04 2.133E+00 1.059E+01 1.588E+04 1.067E+00

Year Total landfill gas Methane

REPORT - 10

Page 97: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

Year(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)

1991 0 0 0 0 0 01992 5.185E+02 2.832E+05 1.903E+01 8.122E+00 2.266E+03 1.523E-011993 1.012E+03 5.527E+05 3.713E+01 1.585E+01 4.421E+03 2.971E-011994 1.481E+03 8.090E+05 5.436E+01 2.320E+01 6.472E+03 4.348E-011995 1.927E+03 1.053E+06 7.074E+01 3.019E+01 8.422E+03 5.659E-011996 2.557E+03 1.397E+06 9.384E+01 4.005E+01 1.117E+04 7.508E-011997 3.040E+03 1.661E+06 1.116E+02 4.763E+01 1.329E+04 8.927E-011998 3.319E+03 1.813E+06 1.218E+02 5.199E+01 1.450E+04 9.745E-011999 3.653E+03 1.995E+06 1.341E+02 5.722E+01 1.596E+04 1.073E+002000 3.999E+03 2.185E+06 1.468E+02 6.265E+01 1.748E+04 1.174E+002001 4.337E+03 2.369E+06 1.592E+02 6.794E+01 1.896E+04 1.274E+002002 4.829E+03 2.638E+06 1.772E+02 7.564E+01 2.110E+04 1.418E+002003 5.322E+03 2.907E+06 1.953E+02 8.337E+01 2.326E+04 1.563E+002004 5.821E+03 3.180E+06 2.137E+02 9.119E+01 2.544E+04 1.709E+002005 6.441E+03 3.519E+06 2.364E+02 1.009E+02 2.815E+04 1.891E+002006 7.043E+03 3.847E+06 2.585E+02 1.103E+02 3.078E+04 2.068E+002007 7.894E+03 4.312E+06 2.897E+02 1.237E+02 3.450E+04 2.318E+002008 8.655E+03 4.728E+06 3.177E+02 1.356E+02 3.783E+04 2.541E+002009 9.438E+03 5.156E+06 3.464E+02 1.479E+02 4.125E+04 2.772E+002010 1.006E+04 5.495E+06 3.692E+02 1.576E+02 4.396E+04 2.954E+002011 1.048E+04 5.726E+06 3.847E+02 1.642E+02 4.581E+04 3.078E+002012 1.060E+04 5.793E+06 3.892E+02 1.661E+02 4.634E+04 3.114E+002013 1.061E+04 5.795E+06 3.894E+02 1.662E+02 4.636E+04 3.115E+002014 1.009E+04 5.513E+06 3.704E+02 1.581E+02 4.410E+04 2.963E+002015 9.599E+03 5.244E+06 3.523E+02 1.504E+02 4.195E+04 2.819E+002016 9.131E+03 4.988E+06 3.352E+02 1.430E+02 3.990E+04 2.681E+002017 8.685E+03 4.745E+06 3.188E+02 1.361E+02 3.796E+04 2.550E+002018 8.262E+03 4.513E+06 3.033E+02 1.294E+02 3.611E+04 2.426E+002019 7.859E+03 4.293E+06 2.885E+02 1.231E+02 3.435E+04 2.308E+002020 7.476E+03 4.084E+06 2.744E+02 1.171E+02 3.267E+04 2.195E+002021 7.111E+03 3.885E+06 2.610E+02 1.114E+02 3.108E+04 2.088E+002022 6.764E+03 3.695E+06 2.483E+02 1.060E+02 2.956E+04 1.986E+002023 6.434E+03 3.515E+06 2.362E+02 1.008E+02 2.812E+04 1.889E+002024 6.121E+03 3.344E+06 2.247E+02 9.588E+01 2.675E+04 1.797E+002025 5.822E+03 3.181E+06 2.137E+02 9.120E+01 2.544E+04 1.710E+002026 5.538E+03 3.025E+06 2.033E+02 8.676E+01 2.420E+04 1.626E+002027 5.268E+03 2.878E+06 1.934E+02 8.253E+01 2.302E+04 1.547E+002028 5.011E+03 2.738E+06 1.839E+02 7.850E+01 2.190E+04 1.471E+002029 4.767E+03 2.604E+06 1.750E+02 7.467E+01 2.083E+04 1.400E+002030 4.534E+03 2.477E+06 1.664E+02 7.103E+01 1.982E+04 1.331E+002031 4.313E+03 2.356E+06 1.583E+02 6.757E+01 1.885E+04 1.267E+002032 4.103E+03 2.241E+06 1.506E+02 6.427E+01 1.793E+04 1.205E+002033 3.903E+03 2.132E+06 1.432E+02 6.114E+01 1.706E+04 1.146E+002034 3.712E+03 2.028E+06 1.363E+02 5.815E+01 1.622E+04 1.090E+002035 3.531E+03 1.929E+06 1.296E+02 5.532E+01 1.543E+04 1.037E+002036 3.359E+03 1.835E+06 1.233E+02 5.262E+01 1.468E+04 9.864E-012037 3.195E+03 1.746E+06 1.173E+02 5.005E+01 1.396E+04 9.383E-012038 3.039E+03 1.660E+06 1.116E+02 4.761E+01 1.328E+04 8.925E-012039 2.891E+03 1.579E+06 1.061E+02 4.529E+01 1.264E+04 8.490E-012040 2.750E+03 1.502E+06 1.009E+02 4.308E+01 1.202E+04 8.076E-01

Carbon dioxide NMOC

REPORT - 11

Page 98: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2041 2.616E+03 1.429E+06 9.602E+01 4.098E+01 1.143E+04 7.682E-012042 2.488E+03 1.359E+06 9.134E+01 3.898E+01 1.088E+04 7.307E-012043 2.367E+03 1.293E+06 8.688E+01 3.708E+01 1.034E+04 6.951E-012044 2.252E+03 1.230E+06 8.265E+01 3.527E+01 9.840E+03 6.612E-012045 2.142E+03 1.170E+06 7.862E+01 3.355E+01 9.360E+03 6.289E-012046 2.037E+03 1.113E+06 7.478E+01 3.192E+01 8.904E+03 5.983E-012047 1.938E+03 1.059E+06 7.114E+01 3.036E+01 8.470E+03 5.691E-012048 1.843E+03 1.007E+06 6.767E+01 2.888E+01 8.057E+03 5.413E-012049 1.754E+03 9.580E+05 6.437E+01 2.747E+01 7.664E+03 5.149E-012050 1.668E+03 9.112E+05 6.123E+01 2.613E+01 7.290E+03 4.898E-012051 1.587E+03 8.668E+05 5.824E+01 2.486E+01 6.934E+03 4.659E-012052 1.509E+03 8.245E+05 5.540E+01 2.364E+01 6.596E+03 4.432E-012053 1.436E+03 7.843E+05 5.270E+01 2.249E+01 6.275E+03 4.216E-012054 1.366E+03 7.461E+05 5.013E+01 2.139E+01 5.969E+03 4.010E-012055 1.299E+03 7.097E+05 4.768E+01 2.035E+01 5.677E+03 3.815E-012056 1.236E+03 6.751E+05 4.536E+01 1.936E+01 5.401E+03 3.629E-012057 1.175E+03 6.421E+05 4.315E+01 1.841E+01 5.137E+03 3.452E-012058 1.118E+03 6.108E+05 4.104E+01 1.752E+01 4.887E+03 3.283E-012059 1.064E+03 5.810E+05 3.904E+01 1.666E+01 4.648E+03 3.123E-012060 1.012E+03 5.527E+05 3.714E+01 1.585E+01 4.422E+03 2.971E-012061 9.624E+02 5.257E+05 3.532E+01 1.508E+01 4.206E+03 2.826E-012062 9.154E+02 5.001E+05 3.360E+01 1.434E+01 4.001E+03 2.688E-012063 8.708E+02 4.757E+05 3.196E+01 1.364E+01 3.806E+03 2.557E-012064 8.283E+02 4.525E+05 3.040E+01 1.298E+01 3.620E+03 2.432E-012065 7.879E+02 4.304E+05 2.892E+01 1.234E+01 3.444E+03 2.314E-012066 7.495E+02 4.094E+05 2.751E+01 1.174E+01 3.276E+03 2.201E-012067 7.129E+02 3.895E+05 2.617E+01 1.117E+01 3.116E+03 2.094E-012068 6.782E+02 3.705E+05 2.489E+01 1.062E+01 2.964E+03 1.991E-012069 6.451E+02 3.524E+05 2.368E+01 1.011E+01 2.819E+03 1.894E-012070 6.136E+02 3.352E+05 2.252E+01 9.613E+00 2.682E+03 1.802E-012071 5.837E+02 3.189E+05 2.143E+01 9.144E+00 2.551E+03 1.714E-012072 5.552E+02 3.033E+05 2.038E+01 8.698E+00 2.427E+03 1.630E-012073 5.282E+02 2.885E+05 1.939E+01 8.274E+00 2.308E+03 1.551E-012074 5.024E+02 2.745E+05 1.844E+01 7.870E+00 2.196E+03 1.475E-012075 4.779E+02 2.611E+05 1.754E+01 7.487E+00 2.089E+03 1.403E-012076 4.546E+02 2.483E+05 1.669E+01 7.121E+00 1.987E+03 1.335E-012077 4.324E+02 2.362E+05 1.587E+01 6.774E+00 1.890E+03 1.270E-012078 4.113E+02 2.247E+05 1.510E+01 6.444E+00 1.798E+03 1.208E-012079 3.913E+02 2.138E+05 1.436E+01 6.129E+00 1.710E+03 1.149E-012080 3.722E+02 2.033E+05 1.366E+01 5.831E+00 1.627E+03 1.093E-012081 3.540E+02 1.934E+05 1.300E+01 5.546E+00 1.547E+03 1.040E-012082 3.368E+02 1.840E+05 1.236E+01 5.276E+00 1.472E+03 9.889E-022083 3.203E+02 1.750E+05 1.176E+01 5.018E+00 1.400E+03 9.407E-022084 3.047E+02 1.665E+05 1.119E+01 4.774E+00 1.332E+03 8.948E-022085 2.899E+02 1.584E+05 1.064E+01 4.541E+00 1.267E+03 8.512E-022086 2.757E+02 1.506E+05 1.012E+01 4.319E+00 1.205E+03 8.097E-022087 2.623E+02 1.433E+05 9.627E+00 4.109E+00 1.146E+03 7.702E-022088 2.495E+02 1.363E+05 9.158E+00 3.908E+00 1.090E+03 7.326E-022089 2.373E+02 1.296E+05 8.711E+00 3.718E+00 1.037E+03 6.969E-022090 2.257E+02 1.233E+05 8.286E+00 3.536E+00 9.866E+02 6.629E-022091 2.147E+02 1.173E+05 7.882E+00 3.364E+00 9.385E+02 6.306E-02

NMOCCarbon dioxideYear

REPORT - 12

Page 99: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final CAA.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2092 2.043E+02 1.116E+05 7.498E+00 3.200E+00 8.927E+02 5.998E-022093 1.943E+02 1.061E+05 7.132E+00 3.044E+00 8.492E+02 5.706E-022094 1.848E+02 1.010E+05 6.784E+00 2.895E+00 8.078E+02 5.427E-022095 1.758E+02 9.604E+04 6.453E+00 2.754E+00 7.684E+02 5.163E-022096 1.672E+02 9.136E+04 6.138E+00 2.620E+00 7.309E+02 4.911E-022097 1.591E+02 8.690E+04 5.839E+00 2.492E+00 6.952E+02 4.671E-022098 1.513E+02 8.267E+04 5.554E+00 2.371E+00 6.613E+02 4.443E-022099 1.439E+02 7.863E+04 5.283E+00 2.255E+00 6.291E+02 4.227E-022100 1.369E+02 7.480E+04 5.026E+00 2.145E+00 5.984E+02 4.021E-022101 1.302E+02 7.115E+04 4.781E+00 2.040E+00 5.692E+02 3.825E-022102 1.239E+02 6.768E+04 4.548E+00 1.941E+00 5.415E+02 3.638E-022103 1.178E+02 6.438E+04 4.326E+00 1.846E+00 5.150E+02 3.461E-022104 1.121E+02 6.124E+04 4.115E+00 1.756E+00 4.899E+02 3.292E-022105 1.066E+02 5.825E+04 3.914E+00 1.670E+00 4.660E+02 3.131E-022106 1.014E+02 5.541E+04 3.723E+00 1.589E+00 4.433E+02 2.979E-022107 9.649E+01 5.271E+04 3.542E+00 1.512E+00 4.217E+02 2.833E-022108 9.178E+01 5.014E+04 3.369E+00 1.438E+00 4.011E+02 2.695E-022109 8.730E+01 4.769E+04 3.205E+00 1.368E+00 3.816E+02 2.564E-022110 8.305E+01 4.537E+04 3.048E+00 1.301E+00 3.629E+02 2.439E-022111 7.900E+01 4.316E+04 2.900E+00 1.238E+00 3.452E+02 2.320E-022112 7.514E+01 4.105E+04 2.758E+00 1.177E+00 3.284E+02 2.207E-022113 7.148E+01 3.905E+04 2.624E+00 1.120E+00 3.124E+02 2.099E-022114 6.799E+01 3.714E+04 2.496E+00 1.065E+00 2.972E+02 1.997E-022115 6.468E+01 3.533E+04 2.374E+00 1.013E+00 2.827E+02 1.899E-022116 6.152E+01 3.361E+04 2.258E+00 9.638E-01 2.689E+02 1.807E-022117 5.852E+01 3.197E+04 2.148E+00 9.168E-01 2.558E+02 1.718E-022118 5.567E+01 3.041E+04 2.043E+00 8.721E-01 2.433E+02 1.635E-022119 5.295E+01 2.893E+04 1.944E+00 8.295E-01 2.314E+02 1.555E-022120 5.037E+01 2.752E+04 1.849E+00 7.891E-01 2.201E+02 1.479E-022121 4.791E+01 2.618E+04 1.759E+00 7.506E-01 2.094E+02 1.407E-022122 4.558E+01 2.490E+04 1.673E+00 7.140E-01 1.992E+02 1.338E-022123 4.335E+01 2.368E+04 1.591E+00 6.792E-01 1.895E+02 1.273E-022124 4.124E+01 2.253E+04 1.514E+00 6.460E-01 1.802E+02 1.211E-022125 3.923E+01 2.143E+04 1.440E+00 6.145E-01 1.714E+02 1.152E-022126 3.732E+01 2.039E+04 1.370E+00 5.846E-01 1.631E+02 1.096E-022127 3.550E+01 1.939E+04 1.303E+00 5.561E-01 1.551E+02 1.042E-022128 3.376E+01 1.845E+04 1.239E+00 5.289E-01 1.476E+02 9.915E-032129 3.212E+01 1.755E+04 1.179E+00 5.031E-01 1.404E+02 9.431E-032130 3.055E+01 1.669E+04 1.121E+00 4.786E-01 1.335E+02 8.971E-032131 2.906E+01 1.588E+04 1.067E+00 4.553E-01 1.270E+02 8.534E-03

NMOCYear Carbon dioxide

REPORT - 13

Page 100: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

AP-42 Defaults

Page 101: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Summary ReportLandfill Name or Identifier: Nabors Landfill

Date:

First-Order Decomposition Rate Equation:

Where,QCH4 = annual methane generation in the year of the calculation (m 3 /year )i = 1-year time increment Mi = mass of waste accepted in the ith year (Mg ) n = (year of the calculation) - (initial year of waste acceptance)j = 0.1-year time incrementk = methane generation rate (year -1 )Lo = potential methane generation capacity (m 3 /Mg )

tij = age of the jth section of waste mass Mi accepted in the ith year (decimal years , e.g., 3.2 years)

LandGEM is considered a screening tool — the better the input data, the better the estimates. Often, there are limitations with the available data regarding waste quantity and composition, variation in design and operating practices over time, and changes occurring over time that impact the emissions potential. Changes to landfill operation, such as operating under wet conditions through leachate recirculation or other liquid additions, will result in generating more gas at a faster rate. Defaults for estimating emissions for this type of operation are being developed to include in LandGEM along with defaults for convential landfills (no leachate or liquid additions) for developing emission inventories and determining CAA applicability. Refer to the Web site identified above for future updates.

Thursday, February 19, 2015

LandGEM is based on a first-order decomposition rate equation for quantifying emissions from the decomposition of landfilled waste in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The software provides a relatively simple approach to estimating landfill gas emissions. Model defaults are based on empirical data from U.S. landfills. Field test data can also be used in place of model defaults when available. Further guidance on EPA test methods, Clean Air Act (CAA) regulations, and other guidance regarding landfill gas emissions and control technology requirements can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/landfill/landflpg.html.

Description/Comments:

About LandGEM:

REPORT - 1

Page 102: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Input Review

LANDFILL CHARACTERISTICSLandfill Open Year 1991Landfill Closure Year (with 80-year limit) 2012Actual Closure Year (without limit) 2012Have Model Calculate Closure Year? NoWaste Design Capacity megagrams

MODEL PARAMETERSMethane Generation Rate, k 0.040 year -1

Potential Methane Generation Capacity, Lo 100 m 3 /MgNMOC Concentration 4,000 ppmv as hexaneMethane Content 50 % by volume

GASES / POLLUTANTS SELECTEDGas / Pollutant #1: Total landfill gasGas / Pollutant #2: MethaneGas / Pollutant #3: Carbon dioxideGas / Pollutant #4: NMOC

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES

(Mg/year) (short tons/year) (Mg) (short tons)1991 34,078 37,486 0 01992 34,078 37,486 34,078 37,4861993 34,078 37,486 68,156 74,9721994 34,078 37,486 102,235 112,4581995 47,555 52,311 136,313 149,9441996 39,976 43,974 183,868 202,2551997 28,055 30,861 223,845 246,2291998 32,582 35,840 251,900 277,0901999 34,468 37,915 284,482 312,9302000 35,055 38,560 318,950 350,8452001 46,205 50,825 354,005 389,4052002 47,877 52,665 400,209 440,2302003 49,870 54,857 448,086 492,8952004 59,437 65,381 497,956 547,7522005 60,185 66,203 557,394 613,1332006 78,498 86,348 617,578 679,3362007 75,335 82,868 696,076 765,6842008 79,233 87,156 771,411 848,5522009 71,079 78,187 850,644 935,7082010 59,958 65,954 921,723 1,013,8952011 41,633 45,796 981,681 1,079,8492012 34,325 37,757 1,023,314 1,125,6452013 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022014 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022015 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022016 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022017 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022018 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022019 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022020 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022021 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022022 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022023 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022024 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022025 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022026 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022027 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022028 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022029 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022030 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,402

Year Waste Accepted Waste-In-Place

REPORT - 2

Page 103: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES (Continued)

(Mg/year) (short tons/year) (Mg) (short tons)2031 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022032 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022033 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022034 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022035 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022036 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022037 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022038 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022039 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022040 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022041 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022042 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022043 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022044 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022045 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022046 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022047 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022048 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022049 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022050 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022051 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022052 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022053 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022054 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022055 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022056 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022057 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022058 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022059 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022060 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022061 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022062 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022063 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022064 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022065 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022066 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022067 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022068 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022069 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,4022070 0 0 1,057,638 1,163,402

Year Waste Accepted Waste-In-Place

REPORT - 3

Page 104: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Pollutant Parameters

Concentration ConcentrationCompound (ppmv ) Molecular Weight (ppmv ) Molecular Weight

Total landfill gas 0.00Methane 16.04Carbon dioxide 44.01NMOC 4,000 86.181,1,1-Trichloroethane (methyl chloroform) - HAP 0.48 133.411,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane - HAP/VOC 1.1 167.851,1-Dichloroethane (ethylidene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 2.4 98.971,1-Dichloroethene (vinylidene chloride) - HAP/VOC 0.20 96.941,2-Dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 0.41 98.961,2-Dichloropropane (propylene dichloride) - HAP/VOC 0.18 112.992-Propanol (isopropyl alcohol) - VOC 50 60.11Acetone 7.0 58.08

Acrylonitrile - HAP/VOC 6.3 53.06Benzene - No or Unknown Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 1.9 78.11Benzene - Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 11 78.11Bromodichloromethane - VOC 3.1 163.83Butane - VOC 5.0 58.12Carbon disulfide - HAP/VOC 0.58 76.13Carbon monoxide 140 28.01Carbon tetrachloride - HAP/VOC 4.0E-03 153.84Carbonyl sulfide - HAP/VOC 0.49 60.07Chlorobenzene - HAP/VOC 0.25 112.56Chlorodifluoromethane 1.3 86.47Chloroethane (ethyl chloride) - HAP/VOC 1.3 64.52Chloroform - HAP/VOC 0.03 119.39Chloromethane - VOC 1.2 50.49

Dichlorobenzene - (HAP for para isomer/VOC) 0.21 147

Dichlorodifluoromethane 16 120.91Dichlorofluoromethane - VOC 2.6 102.92Dichloromethane (methylene chloride) - HAP 14 84.94Dimethyl sulfide (methyl sulfide) - VOC 7.8 62.13Ethane 890 30.07Ethanol - VOC 27 46.08

Gas / Pollutant Default Parameters:

Pollu

tant

s

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:

Gas

es

REPORT - 4

Page 105: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Pollutant Parameters (Continued)

Concentration ConcentrationCompound (ppmv ) Molecular Weight (ppmv ) Molecular Weight

Ethyl mercaptan (ethanethiol) - VOC 2.3 62.13Ethylbenzene - HAP/VOC 4.6 106.16Ethylene dibromide - HAP/VOC 1.0E-03 187.88Fluorotrichloromethane - VOC 0.76 137.38Hexane - HAP/VOC 6.6 86.18Hydrogen sulfide 36 34.08Mercury (total) - HAP 2.9E-04 200.61Methyl ethyl ketone - HAP/VOC 7.1 72.11Methyl isobutyl ketone - HAP/VOC 1.9 100.16

Methyl mercaptan - VOC 2.5 48.11Pentane - VOC 3.3 72.15Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) - HAP 3.7 165.83Propane - VOC 11 44.09t-1,2-Dichloroethene - VOC 2.8 96.94Toluene - No or Unknown Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 39 92.13Toluene - Co-disposal - HAP/VOC 170 92.13Trichloroethylene (trichloroethene) - HAP/VOC 2.8 131.40Vinyl chloride - HAP/VOC 7.3 62.50Xylenes - HAP/VOC 12 106.16

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:Gas / Pollutant Default Parameters:

Pollu

tant

s

REPORT - 5

Page 106: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

REPORT - 6

Page 107: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Graphs

0.000E+00

1.000E+03

2.000E+03

3.000E+03

4.000E+03

5.000E+03

6.000E+03

7.000E+03

8.000E+03

Emis

sion

s

Year

Megagrams Per Year

Total landfill gas Methane Carbon dioxide NMOC

0.000E+00

1.000E+06

2.000E+06

3.000E+06

4.000E+06

5.000E+06

6.000E+06

7.000E+06

Emis

sion

s

Year

Cubic Meters Per Year

Total landfill gas Methane Carbon dioxide NMOC

0.000E+005.000E+011.000E+021.500E+022.000E+022.500E+023.000E+023.500E+024.000E+024.500E+02

Emis

sion

s

Year

User-specified Unit (units shown in legend below)

Total landfill gas (av ft^3/min) Methane (av ft^3/min)

Carbon dioxide (av ft^3/min) NMOC (av ft^3/min)

REPORT - 7

Page 108: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Results

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)1991 0 0 0 0 0 01992 3.344E+02 2.678E+05 1.799E+01 8.932E+01 1.339E+05 8.996E+001993 6.557E+02 5.251E+05 3.528E+01 1.751E+02 2.625E+05 1.764E+011994 9.644E+02 7.723E+05 5.189E+01 2.576E+02 3.861E+05 2.594E+011995 1.261E+03 1.010E+06 6.785E+01 3.368E+02 5.049E+05 3.392E+011996 1.678E+03 1.344E+06 9.029E+01 4.483E+02 6.719E+05 4.515E+011997 2.005E+03 1.605E+06 1.079E+02 5.355E+02 8.026E+05 5.393E+011998 2.201E+03 1.763E+06 1.184E+02 5.880E+02 8.814E+05 5.922E+011999 2.435E+03 1.950E+06 1.310E+02 6.504E+02 9.748E+05 6.550E+012000 2.678E+03 2.144E+06 1.441E+02 7.152E+02 1.072E+06 7.203E+012001 2.917E+03 2.335E+06 1.569E+02 7.791E+02 1.168E+06 7.846E+012002 3.256E+03 2.607E+06 1.752E+02 8.696E+02 1.303E+06 8.758E+012003 3.598E+03 2.881E+06 1.936E+02 9.610E+02 1.440E+06 9.679E+012004 3.946E+03 3.160E+06 2.123E+02 1.054E+03 1.580E+06 1.062E+022005 4.375E+03 3.503E+06 2.354E+02 1.169E+03 1.751E+06 1.177E+022006 4.794E+03 3.839E+06 2.579E+02 1.280E+03 1.919E+06 1.290E+022007 5.376E+03 4.305E+06 2.892E+02 1.436E+03 2.152E+06 1.446E+022008 5.904E+03 4.728E+06 3.177E+02 1.577E+03 2.364E+06 1.588E+022009 6.450E+03 5.165E+06 3.471E+02 1.723E+03 2.583E+06 1.735E+022010 6.895E+03 5.521E+06 3.710E+02 1.842E+03 2.761E+06 1.855E+022011 7.213E+03 5.776E+06 3.881E+02 1.927E+03 2.888E+06 1.940E+022012 7.339E+03 5.877E+06 3.948E+02 1.960E+03 2.938E+06 1.974E+022013 7.388E+03 5.916E+06 3.975E+02 1.973E+03 2.958E+06 1.987E+022014 7.098E+03 5.684E+06 3.819E+02 1.896E+03 2.842E+06 1.909E+022015 6.820E+03 5.461E+06 3.669E+02 1.822E+03 2.731E+06 1.835E+022016 6.552E+03 5.247E+06 3.525E+02 1.750E+03 2.623E+06 1.763E+022017 6.296E+03 5.041E+06 3.387E+02 1.682E+03 2.521E+06 1.694E+022018 6.049E+03 4.843E+06 3.254E+02 1.616E+03 2.422E+06 1.627E+022019 5.811E+03 4.654E+06 3.127E+02 1.552E+03 2.327E+06 1.563E+022020 5.584E+03 4.471E+06 3.004E+02 1.491E+03 2.236E+06 1.502E+022021 5.365E+03 4.296E+06 2.886E+02 1.433E+03 2.148E+06 1.443E+022022 5.154E+03 4.127E+06 2.773E+02 1.377E+03 2.064E+06 1.387E+022023 4.952E+03 3.966E+06 2.664E+02 1.323E+03 1.983E+06 1.332E+022024 4.758E+03 3.810E+06 2.560E+02 1.271E+03 1.905E+06 1.280E+022025 4.571E+03 3.661E+06 2.460E+02 1.221E+03 1.830E+06 1.230E+022026 4.392E+03 3.517E+06 2.363E+02 1.173E+03 1.759E+06 1.182E+022027 4.220E+03 3.379E+06 2.270E+02 1.127E+03 1.690E+06 1.135E+022028 4.055E+03 3.247E+06 2.181E+02 1.083E+03 1.623E+06 1.091E+022029 3.896E+03 3.119E+06 2.096E+02 1.041E+03 1.560E+06 1.048E+022030 3.743E+03 2.997E+06 2.014E+02 9.997E+02 1.499E+06 1.007E+022031 3.596E+03 2.880E+06 1.935E+02 9.605E+02 1.440E+06 9.674E+012032 3.455E+03 2.767E+06 1.859E+02 9.229E+02 1.383E+06 9.295E+012033 3.320E+03 2.658E+06 1.786E+02 8.867E+02 1.329E+06 8.930E+012034 3.189E+03 2.554E+06 1.716E+02 8.519E+02 1.277E+06 8.580E+012035 3.064E+03 2.454E+06 1.649E+02 8.185E+02 1.227E+06 8.244E+012036 2.944E+03 2.358E+06 1.584E+02 7.864E+02 1.179E+06 7.920E+012037 2.829E+03 2.265E+06 1.522E+02 7.556E+02 1.133E+06 7.610E+012038 2.718E+03 2.176E+06 1.462E+02 7.260E+02 1.088E+06 7.311E+012039 2.611E+03 2.091E+06 1.405E+02 6.975E+02 1.045E+06 7.025E+012040 2.509E+03 2.009E+06 1.350E+02 6.701E+02 1.004E+06 6.749E+01

Year Total landfill gas Methane

REPORT - 8

Page 109: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2041 2.411E+03 1.930E+06 1.297E+02 6.439E+02 9.651E+05 6.485E+012042 2.316E+03 1.855E+06 1.246E+02 6.186E+02 9.273E+05 6.230E+012043 2.225E+03 1.782E+06 1.197E+02 5.944E+02 8.909E+05 5.986E+012044 2.138E+03 1.712E+06 1.150E+02 5.711E+02 8.560E+05 5.751E+012045 2.054E+03 1.645E+06 1.105E+02 5.487E+02 8.224E+05 5.526E+012046 1.974E+03 1.580E+06 1.062E+02 5.272E+02 7.902E+05 5.309E+012047 1.896E+03 1.518E+06 1.020E+02 5.065E+02 7.592E+05 5.101E+012048 1.822E+03 1.459E+06 9.802E+01 4.866E+02 7.294E+05 4.901E+012049 1.750E+03 1.402E+06 9.418E+01 4.675E+02 7.008E+05 4.709E+012050 1.682E+03 1.347E+06 9.048E+01 4.492E+02 6.733E+05 4.524E+012051 1.616E+03 1.294E+06 8.693E+01 4.316E+02 6.469E+05 4.347E+012052 1.552E+03 1.243E+06 8.353E+01 4.147E+02 6.216E+05 4.176E+012053 1.492E+03 1.194E+06 8.025E+01 3.984E+02 5.972E+05 4.013E+012054 1.433E+03 1.148E+06 7.710E+01 3.828E+02 5.738E+05 3.855E+012055 1.377E+03 1.103E+06 7.408E+01 3.678E+02 5.513E+05 3.704E+012056 1.323E+03 1.059E+06 7.118E+01 3.534E+02 5.297E+05 3.559E+012057 1.271E+03 1.018E+06 6.839E+01 3.395E+02 5.089E+05 3.419E+012058 1.221E+03 9.779E+05 6.570E+01 3.262E+02 4.889E+05 3.285E+012059 1.173E+03 9.395E+05 6.313E+01 3.134E+02 4.698E+05 3.156E+012060 1.127E+03 9.027E+05 6.065E+01 3.011E+02 4.513E+05 3.033E+012061 1.083E+03 8.673E+05 5.827E+01 2.893E+02 4.337E+05 2.914E+012062 1.041E+03 8.333E+05 5.599E+01 2.780E+02 4.166E+05 2.799E+012063 9.998E+02 8.006E+05 5.379E+01 2.671E+02 4.003E+05 2.690E+012064 9.606E+02 7.692E+05 5.168E+01 2.566E+02 3.846E+05 2.584E+012065 9.230E+02 7.391E+05 4.966E+01 2.465E+02 3.695E+05 2.483E+012066 8.868E+02 7.101E+05 4.771E+01 2.369E+02 3.550E+05 2.386E+012067 8.520E+02 6.822E+05 4.584E+01 2.276E+02 3.411E+05 2.292E+012068 8.186E+02 6.555E+05 4.404E+01 2.187E+02 3.277E+05 2.202E+012069 7.865E+02 6.298E+05 4.232E+01 2.101E+02 3.149E+05 2.116E+012070 7.557E+02 6.051E+05 4.066E+01 2.018E+02 3.025E+05 2.033E+012071 7.260E+02 5.814E+05 3.906E+01 1.939E+02 2.907E+05 1.953E+012072 6.976E+02 5.586E+05 3.753E+01 1.863E+02 2.793E+05 1.877E+012073 6.702E+02 5.367E+05 3.606E+01 1.790E+02 2.683E+05 1.803E+012074 6.439E+02 5.156E+05 3.465E+01 1.720E+02 2.578E+05 1.732E+012075 6.187E+02 4.954E+05 3.329E+01 1.653E+02 2.477E+05 1.664E+012076 5.944E+02 4.760E+05 3.198E+01 1.588E+02 2.380E+05 1.599E+012077 5.711E+02 4.573E+05 3.073E+01 1.526E+02 2.287E+05 1.536E+012078 5.487E+02 4.394E+05 2.952E+01 1.466E+02 2.197E+05 1.476E+012079 5.272E+02 4.222E+05 2.837E+01 1.408E+02 2.111E+05 1.418E+012080 5.065E+02 4.056E+05 2.725E+01 1.353E+02 2.028E+05 1.363E+012081 4.867E+02 3.897E+05 2.618E+01 1.300E+02 1.949E+05 1.309E+012082 4.676E+02 3.744E+05 2.516E+01 1.249E+02 1.872E+05 1.258E+012083 4.493E+02 3.597E+05 2.417E+01 1.200E+02 1.799E+05 1.209E+012084 4.316E+02 3.456E+05 2.322E+01 1.153E+02 1.728E+05 1.161E+012085 4.147E+02 3.321E+05 2.231E+01 1.108E+02 1.660E+05 1.116E+012086 3.985E+02 3.191E+05 2.144E+01 1.064E+02 1.595E+05 1.072E+012087 3.828E+02 3.066E+05 2.060E+01 1.023E+02 1.533E+05 1.030E+012088 3.678E+02 2.945E+05 1.979E+01 9.825E+01 1.473E+05 9.895E+002089 3.534E+02 2.830E+05 1.901E+01 9.440E+01 1.415E+05 9.507E+002090 3.395E+02 2.719E+05 1.827E+01 9.069E+01 1.359E+05 9.134E+002091 3.262E+02 2.612E+05 1.755E+01 8.714E+01 1.306E+05 8.776E+00

Total landfill gasYear Methane

REPORT - 9

Page 110: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2092 3.134E+02 2.510E+05 1.686E+01 8.372E+01 1.255E+05 8.432E+002093 3.011E+02 2.411E+05 1.620E+01 8.044E+01 1.206E+05 8.101E+002094 2.893E+02 2.317E+05 1.557E+01 7.729E+01 1.158E+05 7.784E+002095 2.780E+02 2.226E+05 1.496E+01 7.425E+01 1.113E+05 7.478E+002096 2.671E+02 2.139E+05 1.437E+01 7.134E+01 1.069E+05 7.185E+002097 2.566E+02 2.055E+05 1.381E+01 6.855E+01 1.027E+05 6.903E+002098 2.466E+02 1.974E+05 1.327E+01 6.586E+01 9.872E+04 6.633E+002099 2.369E+02 1.897E+05 1.275E+01 6.328E+01 9.484E+04 6.373E+002100 2.276E+02 1.823E+05 1.225E+01 6.079E+01 9.113E+04 6.123E+002101 2.187E+02 1.751E+05 1.177E+01 5.841E+01 8.755E+04 5.883E+002102 2.101E+02 1.682E+05 1.130E+01 5.612E+01 8.412E+04 5.652E+002103 2.019E+02 1.616E+05 1.086E+01 5.392E+01 8.082E+04 5.430E+002104 1.939E+02 1.553E+05 1.043E+01 5.181E+01 7.765E+04 5.217E+002105 1.863E+02 1.492E+05 1.003E+01 4.977E+01 7.461E+04 5.013E+002106 1.790E+02 1.434E+05 9.633E+00 4.782E+01 7.168E+04 4.816E+002107 1.720E+02 1.377E+05 9.255E+00 4.595E+01 6.887E+04 4.627E+002108 1.653E+02 1.323E+05 8.892E+00 4.415E+01 6.617E+04 4.446E+002109 1.588E+02 1.272E+05 8.543E+00 4.241E+01 6.358E+04 4.272E+002110 1.526E+02 1.222E+05 8.208E+00 4.075E+01 6.108E+04 4.104E+002111 1.466E+02 1.174E+05 7.887E+00 3.915E+01 5.869E+04 3.943E+002112 1.408E+02 1.128E+05 7.577E+00 3.762E+01 5.639E+04 3.789E+002113 1.353E+02 1.084E+05 7.280E+00 3.614E+01 5.418E+04 3.640E+002114 1.300E+02 1.041E+05 6.995E+00 3.473E+01 5.205E+04 3.497E+002115 1.249E+02 1.000E+05 6.720E+00 3.336E+01 5.001E+04 3.360E+002116 1.200E+02 9.610E+04 6.457E+00 3.206E+01 4.805E+04 3.228E+002117 1.153E+02 9.233E+04 6.204E+00 3.080E+01 4.617E+04 3.102E+002118 1.108E+02 8.871E+04 5.961E+00 2.959E+01 4.436E+04 2.980E+002119 1.064E+02 8.523E+04 5.727E+00 2.843E+01 4.262E+04 2.863E+002120 1.023E+02 8.189E+04 5.502E+00 2.732E+01 4.095E+04 2.751E+002121 9.826E+01 7.868E+04 5.287E+00 2.625E+01 3.934E+04 2.643E+002122 9.440E+01 7.560E+04 5.079E+00 2.522E+01 3.780E+04 2.540E+002123 9.070E+01 7.263E+04 4.880E+00 2.423E+01 3.632E+04 2.440E+002124 8.715E+01 6.978E+04 4.689E+00 2.328E+01 3.489E+04 2.344E+002125 8.373E+01 6.705E+04 4.505E+00 2.237E+01 3.352E+04 2.252E+002126 8.045E+01 6.442E+04 4.328E+00 2.149E+01 3.221E+04 2.164E+002127 7.729E+01 6.189E+04 4.159E+00 2.065E+01 3.095E+04 2.079E+002128 7.426E+01 5.947E+04 3.995E+00 1.984E+01 2.973E+04 1.998E+002129 7.135E+01 5.713E+04 3.839E+00 1.906E+01 2.857E+04 1.919E+002130 6.855E+01 5.489E+04 3.688E+00 1.831E+01 2.745E+04 1.844E+002131 6.586E+01 5.274E+04 3.544E+00 1.759E+01 2.637E+04 1.772E+00

Year Total landfill gas Methane

REPORT - 10

Page 111: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

Year(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)

1991 0 0 0 0 0 01992 2.451E+02 1.339E+05 8.996E+00 3.839E+00 1.071E+03 7.197E-021993 4.806E+02 2.625E+05 1.764E+01 7.528E+00 2.100E+03 1.411E-011994 7.068E+02 3.861E+05 2.594E+01 1.107E+01 3.089E+03 2.075E-011995 9.242E+02 5.049E+05 3.392E+01 1.448E+01 4.039E+03 2.714E-011996 1.230E+03 6.719E+05 4.515E+01 1.927E+01 5.375E+03 3.612E-011997 1.469E+03 8.026E+05 5.393E+01 2.302E+01 6.421E+03 4.314E-011998 1.613E+03 8.814E+05 5.922E+01 2.527E+01 7.051E+03 4.738E-011999 1.784E+03 9.748E+05 6.550E+01 2.795E+01 7.799E+03 5.240E-012000 1.962E+03 1.072E+06 7.203E+01 3.074E+01 8.576E+03 5.762E-012001 2.138E+03 1.168E+06 7.846E+01 3.349E+01 9.342E+03 6.277E-012002 2.386E+03 1.303E+06 8.758E+01 3.738E+01 1.043E+04 7.006E-012003 2.637E+03 1.440E+06 9.679E+01 4.131E+01 1.152E+04 7.743E-012004 2.892E+03 1.580E+06 1.062E+02 4.531E+01 1.264E+04 8.492E-012005 3.206E+03 1.751E+06 1.177E+02 5.023E+01 1.401E+04 9.415E-012006 3.513E+03 1.919E+06 1.290E+02 5.504E+01 1.535E+04 1.032E+002007 3.940E+03 2.152E+06 1.446E+02 6.172E+01 1.722E+04 1.157E+002008 4.327E+03 2.364E+06 1.588E+02 6.779E+01 1.891E+04 1.271E+002009 4.727E+03 2.583E+06 1.735E+02 7.406E+01 2.066E+04 1.388E+002010 5.053E+03 2.761E+06 1.855E+02 7.916E+01 2.208E+04 1.484E+002011 5.286E+03 2.888E+06 1.940E+02 8.281E+01 2.310E+04 1.552E+002012 5.379E+03 2.938E+06 1.974E+02 8.426E+01 2.351E+04 1.579E+002013 5.414E+03 2.958E+06 1.987E+02 8.482E+01 2.366E+04 1.590E+002014 5.202E+03 2.842E+06 1.909E+02 8.149E+01 2.274E+04 1.528E+002015 4.998E+03 2.731E+06 1.835E+02 7.830E+01 2.184E+04 1.468E+002016 4.802E+03 2.623E+06 1.763E+02 7.523E+01 2.099E+04 1.410E+002017 4.614E+03 2.521E+06 1.694E+02 7.228E+01 2.016E+04 1.355E+002018 4.433E+03 2.422E+06 1.627E+02 6.945E+01 1.937E+04 1.302E+002019 4.259E+03 2.327E+06 1.563E+02 6.672E+01 1.861E+04 1.251E+002020 4.092E+03 2.236E+06 1.502E+02 6.411E+01 1.788E+04 1.202E+002021 3.932E+03 2.148E+06 1.443E+02 6.159E+01 1.718E+04 1.155E+002022 3.778E+03 2.064E+06 1.387E+02 5.918E+01 1.651E+04 1.109E+002023 3.629E+03 1.983E+06 1.332E+02 5.686E+01 1.586E+04 1.066E+002024 3.487E+03 1.905E+06 1.280E+02 5.463E+01 1.524E+04 1.024E+002025 3.350E+03 1.830E+06 1.230E+02 5.249E+01 1.464E+04 9.838E-012026 3.219E+03 1.759E+06 1.182E+02 5.043E+01 1.407E+04 9.453E-012027 3.093E+03 1.690E+06 1.135E+02 4.845E+01 1.352E+04 9.082E-012028 2.972E+03 1.623E+06 1.091E+02 4.655E+01 1.299E+04 8.726E-012029 2.855E+03 1.560E+06 1.048E+02 4.473E+01 1.248E+04 8.384E-012030 2.743E+03 1.499E+06 1.007E+02 4.297E+01 1.199E+04 8.055E-012031 2.636E+03 1.440E+06 9.674E+01 4.129E+01 1.152E+04 7.739E-012032 2.532E+03 1.383E+06 9.295E+01 3.967E+01 1.107E+04 7.436E-012033 2.433E+03 1.329E+06 8.930E+01 3.811E+01 1.063E+04 7.144E-012034 2.337E+03 1.277E+06 8.580E+01 3.662E+01 1.022E+04 6.864E-012035 2.246E+03 1.227E+06 8.244E+01 3.518E+01 9.815E+03 6.595E-012036 2.158E+03 1.179E+06 7.920E+01 3.380E+01 9.430E+03 6.336E-012037 2.073E+03 1.133E+06 7.610E+01 3.248E+01 9.061E+03 6.088E-012038 1.992E+03 1.088E+06 7.311E+01 3.120E+01 8.705E+03 5.849E-012039 1.914E+03 1.045E+06 7.025E+01 2.998E+01 8.364E+03 5.620E-012040 1.839E+03 1.004E+06 6.749E+01 2.880E+01 8.036E+03 5.399E-01

Carbon dioxide NMOC

REPORT - 11

Page 112: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2041 1.767E+03 9.651E+05 6.485E+01 2.768E+01 7.721E+03 5.188E-012042 1.697E+03 9.273E+05 6.230E+01 2.659E+01 7.418E+03 4.984E-012043 1.631E+03 8.909E+05 5.986E+01 2.555E+01 7.127E+03 4.789E-012044 1.567E+03 8.560E+05 5.751E+01 2.455E+01 6.848E+03 4.601E-012045 1.505E+03 8.224E+05 5.526E+01 2.358E+01 6.579E+03 4.421E-012046 1.446E+03 7.902E+05 5.309E+01 2.266E+01 6.321E+03 4.247E-012047 1.390E+03 7.592E+05 5.101E+01 2.177E+01 6.073E+03 4.081E-012048 1.335E+03 7.294E+05 4.901E+01 2.092E+01 5.835E+03 3.921E-012049 1.283E+03 7.008E+05 4.709E+01 2.010E+01 5.607E+03 3.767E-012050 1.233E+03 6.733E+05 4.524E+01 1.931E+01 5.387E+03 3.619E-012051 1.184E+03 6.469E+05 4.347E+01 1.855E+01 5.175E+03 3.477E-012052 1.138E+03 6.216E+05 4.176E+01 1.782E+01 4.973E+03 3.341E-012053 1.093E+03 5.972E+05 4.013E+01 1.712E+01 4.778E+03 3.210E-012054 1.050E+03 5.738E+05 3.855E+01 1.645E+01 4.590E+03 3.084E-012055 1.009E+03 5.513E+05 3.704E+01 1.581E+01 4.410E+03 2.963E-012056 9.695E+02 5.297E+05 3.559E+01 1.519E+01 4.237E+03 2.847E-012057 9.315E+02 5.089E+05 3.419E+01 1.459E+01 4.071E+03 2.735E-012058 8.950E+02 4.889E+05 3.285E+01 1.402E+01 3.912E+03 2.628E-012059 8.599E+02 4.698E+05 3.156E+01 1.347E+01 3.758E+03 2.525E-012060 8.262E+02 4.513E+05 3.033E+01 1.294E+01 3.611E+03 2.426E-012061 7.938E+02 4.337E+05 2.914E+01 1.244E+01 3.469E+03 2.331E-012062 7.627E+02 4.166E+05 2.799E+01 1.195E+01 3.333E+03 2.240E-012063 7.328E+02 4.003E+05 2.690E+01 1.148E+01 3.202E+03 2.152E-012064 7.040E+02 3.846E+05 2.584E+01 1.103E+01 3.077E+03 2.067E-012065 6.764E+02 3.695E+05 2.483E+01 1.060E+01 2.956E+03 1.986E-012066 6.499E+02 3.550E+05 2.386E+01 1.018E+01 2.840E+03 1.908E-012067 6.244E+02 3.411E+05 2.292E+01 9.782E+00 2.729E+03 1.834E-012068 5.999E+02 3.277E+05 2.202E+01 9.398E+00 2.622E+03 1.762E-012069 5.764E+02 3.149E+05 2.116E+01 9.030E+00 2.519E+03 1.693E-012070 5.538E+02 3.025E+05 2.033E+01 8.676E+00 2.420E+03 1.626E-012071 5.321E+02 2.907E+05 1.953E+01 8.336E+00 2.325E+03 1.562E-012072 5.112E+02 2.793E+05 1.877E+01 8.009E+00 2.234E+03 1.501E-012073 4.912E+02 2.683E+05 1.803E+01 7.695E+00 2.147E+03 1.442E-012074 4.719E+02 2.578E+05 1.732E+01 7.393E+00 2.063E+03 1.386E-012075 4.534E+02 2.477E+05 1.664E+01 7.103E+00 1.982E+03 1.331E-012076 4.356E+02 2.380E+05 1.599E+01 6.825E+00 1.904E+03 1.279E-012077 4.186E+02 2.287E+05 1.536E+01 6.557E+00 1.829E+03 1.229E-012078 4.022E+02 2.197E+05 1.476E+01 6.300E+00 1.758E+03 1.181E-012079 3.864E+02 2.111E+05 1.418E+01 6.053E+00 1.689E+03 1.135E-012080 3.712E+02 2.028E+05 1.363E+01 5.816E+00 1.622E+03 1.090E-012081 3.567E+02 1.949E+05 1.309E+01 5.588E+00 1.559E+03 1.047E-012082 3.427E+02 1.872E+05 1.258E+01 5.368E+00 1.498E+03 1.006E-012083 3.293E+02 1.799E+05 1.209E+01 5.158E+00 1.439E+03 9.668E-022084 3.163E+02 1.728E+05 1.161E+01 4.956E+00 1.383E+03 9.289E-022085 3.039E+02 1.660E+05 1.116E+01 4.761E+00 1.328E+03 8.925E-022086 2.920E+02 1.595E+05 1.072E+01 4.575E+00 1.276E+03 8.575E-022087 2.806E+02 1.533E+05 1.030E+01 4.395E+00 1.226E+03 8.239E-022088 2.696E+02 1.473E+05 9.895E+00 4.223E+00 1.178E+03 7.916E-022089 2.590E+02 1.415E+05 9.507E+00 4.057E+00 1.132E+03 7.605E-022090 2.488E+02 1.359E+05 9.134E+00 3.898E+00 1.088E+03 7.307E-022091 2.391E+02 1.306E+05 8.776E+00 3.745E+00 1.045E+03 7.021E-02

NMOCCarbon dioxideYear

REPORT - 12

Page 113: Design Criteria Report Design Professional Services Closure of … · 2019-12-31 · Design Criteria Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

Nabors landgem-v302- Final AP-42.xls 2/19/2015

Results (Continued)

(Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min) (Mg/year) (m 3 /year) (av ft^3/min)2092 2.297E+02 1.255E+05 8.432E+00 3.599E+00 1.004E+03 6.745E-022093 2.207E+02 1.206E+05 8.101E+00 3.457E+00 9.646E+02 6.481E-022094 2.121E+02 1.158E+05 7.784E+00 3.322E+00 9.268E+02 6.227E-022095 2.037E+02 1.113E+05 7.478E+00 3.192E+00 8.904E+02 5.983E-022096 1.957E+02 1.069E+05 7.185E+00 3.067E+00 8.555E+02 5.748E-022097 1.881E+02 1.027E+05 6.903E+00 2.946E+00 8.220E+02 5.523E-022098 1.807E+02 9.872E+04 6.633E+00 2.831E+00 7.897E+02 5.306E-022099 1.736E+02 9.484E+04 6.373E+00 2.720E+00 7.588E+02 5.098E-022100 1.668E+02 9.113E+04 6.123E+00 2.613E+00 7.290E+02 4.898E-022101 1.603E+02 8.755E+04 5.883E+00 2.511E+00 7.004E+02 4.706E-022102 1.540E+02 8.412E+04 5.652E+00 2.412E+00 6.730E+02 4.522E-022103 1.479E+02 8.082E+04 5.430E+00 2.318E+00 6.466E+02 4.344E-022104 1.421E+02 7.765E+04 5.217E+00 2.227E+00 6.212E+02 4.174E-022105 1.366E+02 7.461E+04 5.013E+00 2.139E+00 5.969E+02 4.010E-022106 1.312E+02 7.168E+04 4.816E+00 2.056E+00 5.735E+02 3.853E-022107 1.261E+02 6.887E+04 4.627E+00 1.975E+00 5.510E+02 3.702E-022108 1.211E+02 6.617E+04 4.446E+00 1.898E+00 5.294E+02 3.557E-022109 1.164E+02 6.358E+04 4.272E+00 1.823E+00 5.086E+02 3.417E-022110 1.118E+02 6.108E+04 4.104E+00 1.752E+00 4.887E+02 3.283E-022111 1.074E+02 5.869E+04 3.943E+00 1.683E+00 4.695E+02 3.155E-022112 1.032E+02 5.639E+04 3.789E+00 1.617E+00 4.511E+02 3.031E-022113 9.917E+01 5.418E+04 3.640E+00 1.554E+00 4.334E+02 2.912E-022114 9.528E+01 5.205E+04 3.497E+00 1.493E+00 4.164E+02 2.798E-022115 9.155E+01 5.001E+04 3.360E+00 1.434E+00 4.001E+02 2.688E-022116 8.796E+01 4.805E+04 3.228E+00 1.378E+00 3.844E+02 2.583E-022117 8.451E+01 4.617E+04 3.102E+00 1.324E+00 3.693E+02 2.482E-022118 8.119E+01 4.436E+04 2.980E+00 1.272E+00 3.548E+02 2.384E-022119 7.801E+01 4.262E+04 2.863E+00 1.222E+00 3.409E+02 2.291E-022120 7.495E+01 4.095E+04 2.751E+00 1.174E+00 3.276E+02 2.201E-022121 7.201E+01 3.934E+04 2.643E+00 1.128E+00 3.147E+02 2.115E-022122 6.919E+01 3.780E+04 2.540E+00 1.084E+00 3.024E+02 2.032E-022123 6.648E+01 3.632E+04 2.440E+00 1.041E+00 2.905E+02 1.952E-022124 6.387E+01 3.489E+04 2.344E+00 1.001E+00 2.791E+02 1.875E-022125 6.136E+01 3.352E+04 2.252E+00 9.613E-01 2.682E+02 1.802E-022126 5.896E+01 3.221E+04 2.164E+00 9.236E-01 2.577E+02 1.731E-022127 5.665E+01 3.095E+04 2.079E+00 8.874E-01 2.476E+02 1.663E-022128 5.443E+01 2.973E+04 1.998E+00 8.526E-01 2.379E+02 1.598E-022129 5.229E+01 2.857E+04 1.919E+00 8.192E-01 2.285E+02 1.536E-022130 5.024E+01 2.745E+04 1.844E+00 7.871E-01 2.196E+02 1.475E-022131 4.827E+01 2.637E+04 1.772E+00 7.562E-01 2.110E+02 1.417E-02

NMOCYear Carbon dioxide

REPORT - 13