DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF VALVELESS PULSEJET ENGINE
Transcript of DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF VALVELESS PULSEJET ENGINE
www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]
DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF VALVELESS PULSEJET ENGINE
Dr. T. AHILAN1 & C. SELVAMANI2
1Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, St. Joseph College of Engineering, Anna University,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, St. Joseph College of Engineering,
Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
Pulsejet engine is a suitable engine for MAV applications with minimum effort and versatility. Hot gases in the pulsejet
engine, flimsy stream help to a great degree of testing by scaling, demonstrating and investigation. The outline of
Valveless pulsejet engine depends upon the bay which combines air blended with fuel and dynamic outlet of hot gas
provides throbbing burning, which is employed for push creation. This investigative work concentrates on the plan and
examination of valveless pulsejet motor. In order to examine the stream marvels and its working attributes in a valveless
pulsejet motor, the planning is completed utilizing CREO PARAMETRIC 2.0 and the examination is done utilizing
ANSYS-Fluent programming bundle. The ideal range for burning chamber breadth is 70𝑚𝑚 to 90𝑚𝑚. Pulsejet with 80
𝑚𝑚 ignition chamber distance across produces higher push than 70𝑚𝑚 and 90𝑚𝑚 pulsejet motors.
KEYWORDS: Pulsejet, ANSYS & CREO
Received: Mar 06, 2020; Accepted: Mar 26, 2020; Published: Apr 22, 2020; Paper Id.: IJMPERDJUN20204
1. INTRODUCTION
A heartbeat fly motor (or pulsejet) is a kind of fly motor in which burning happens in beats. It is an insecure
impetus gadget that creates irregular push. Pulsejet motors can be made with few or no moving parts and are
equipped for running statically. Heartbeat fly motors are a lightweight type of stream impetus, yet ordinarily have a
poor pressure proportion, and subsequently give a low particular motivation. Pulsejet is in a perfect world suited for
MAV applications on account of its ease and straightforwardness. The plan of valveless pulsejet depends on the
throbbing ignition provided with delta of outside air blended with fuel and dynamic outlet of hot gas for push
creation. A pulsejet motor is an air-breathing response motor utilizing a progressing succession of discrete ignition
occasions instead of a steady level of burning. This simply recognizes it from other response motor sorts such as
rockets, turbojets and ramjets, which are for the most part consistent ignition gadgets. All other response motors are
driven by keeping up high inner weight; pulsejets are driven by a variation amongst high and low weight. This
variation isn't kept up by any mechanical creation, yet rather by the characteristic acoustic reverberation of the
unbending tubular motor structure. The valveless pulsejet, mechanically, the most straightforward type of pulsejet,
and is in reality the most straightforward known air-breathing drive gadget can work "statically", i.e. without
forward movement.
2. RELATED WORK
Pulsejets work on a thermodynamic cycle near the Humphrey cycle. The Humphrey cycle begins with isentropic
Orig
ina
l Article
nternational Journal of Mechanical and Production
Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD)
ISSN (P): 2249–6890; ISSN (E): 2249–8001
Vol. 10, Issue 3, Jun 2020, 33–46
© TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.
34 Dr. T. Ahilan & C. Selvamani
Impact Factor (JCC): 8.8746 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
pressure that is taken care by isochoric warm expansion. The working liquid is then permitted to isentropically grow, and it
is through this development procedure, impetus is achieved. To close the cycle, the working liquid at that point experiences
an isobaric warm dismissal process. The contrast between the working cycle of the pulsejet and the Humphrey cycle is the
warmth expansion process. It isn't precisely isochoric nor is it precisely isobaric (as in the Brayton, or fly motor, cycles); it
lies some place in the middle. Daniel has done a research and fixed show of a pulsejet-driven, ejector based; weight pick
up ignition framework was displayed. It was demonstrated that at temperature proportions practically identical to those of
present day gas turbine combustors, weight Proportions, close to 1.035 were received. These weight proportions, in
examination to those of regular combustors, may give a 2 to 3.5 percent decrease in particular fuel utilization when utilized
as a part of a gas turbine motor. It was moreover demonstrated that the subsequent insecurity levels, when measured as far
as rms weight vacillations, were just around 4.5 percent of the mean aggregate weight.
Such levels are close as far as possible regarding lessening downstream turbine execution. At last, it was
demonstrated that the idea may yield a low emanations combustor by influencing a down to earth, low misfortune, Rich
burn/ Extinguish/Lean-consume arrangement.
3. DESIGN OF PULSEJET ENGINE
A general approach for the plan of improved pulsejet geometry is still not accessible, despite the fact that it was under
research since 1900's. From accessible written works, these counts were finished. The delta is a round tube that fills in as
the fundamental strategy for breathing in new air into the framework on each cycle. It is for the most part the briefest
segment of the pulsejet and, in this way, likewise has the littlest cross sectional region. After the bay, there can either be
valves, which consistently limit mass from streaming back through the gulf, or the fly can work without valves in which
there is no restrictor. Next, the gulf leads into the burning chamber. The burning chamber for the most part has the biggest
cross sectional territory and fills in as a kind of stagnation zone for the outside air to blend with infused fuel for burning.
The gulf with the burning chamber can be thought of as a Helmholtz resonator. The burning chamber at that point leads
into the fumes pipe, which can be thought of as a basic wave tube. The fumes pipe, for the most part any longer than the
bay and in this manner has a somewhat greater cross sectional territory, not to surpass that of the burning chamber. This
fumes pipe can likewise have a flare on the end to help with vortex age and course. From Ogorelec B., Valveless Pulsejet
Engines and C.E. Tharratt's formulae, this valveless Pulse fly motor's measurements were figured.
4. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
The design calculations are mainly based on the combustion chamber diameter:
Mean diameter of Engine (combustion chamber) =80 𝑚𝑚
10L
D
is required for sustaining combustion with chemical fuels.
Total length of pulsejet engine=16.77D=1341.6 𝑚𝑚
Inlet diameter=0.47D = 37.6 �𝑚
Length of Inlet=1.83D = 146.41 𝑚𝑚
Design and Simulation of Valveless Pulsejet Engine 35
www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]
Throat diameter=0.385D = 30.8 𝑚𝑚
Exhaust pipe exit area=5.2×Throat area=5.2×(3.14×15.42) =3872.35 𝑚𝑚2
Diameter of exhaust pipe = 0.8775D=35 𝑚𝑚
Area of fuel inlet=3.14×3.72 = 43 𝑚𝑚2
Figure 4.1: 2-D Annotation for 70mm Pulsejet Engine.
Figure 4.2: 2-D Annotation for 80mm Pulsejet Engine.
Figure 4.3: 2-D Annotation for 90mm Pulsejet Engine.
This valveless pulsejet was demonstrated in business accessible CREO parametric v2.0 programming. And
afterward, the outline was traded to ANSYS 15- Familiar module programming in '.stp' design. The CREO Models are
appeared underneath.
36 Dr. T. Ahilan & C. Selvamani
Impact Factor (JCC): 8.8746 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Figure 4.4: CREO models of Pulsejet engine.
Table 4.1: Mesh details for 70mm Pulsejet Engine
No of nodes 921565
No of elements 256986
Working fluids Air& Propane gas
Table 4.2: Mesh details for 80mm Pulsejet Engine
No of nodes 1233145
No of elements 345698
Working fluids Air& Propane gas
Table 4.3: Mesh details for 90mm Pulsejet Engine
No of nodes 1496985
No of elements 436982
Working fluids Air& Propane gas
Design and Simulation of Valveless Pulsejet Engine 37
www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]
Table 4.4: Fuel Inlet Boundary Conditions for Valveless Pulsejet
Boundary – Fuel Inlet
Type INLET
Settings
Component 𝐶3𝐻8
Mass Fraction 1.0
Option Mass Fraction
Component 𝐶𝑂2
Mass Fraction 0
Component 𝐻2𝑂
Mass Fraction 0
Component 𝑂2
Mass Fraction 0
Flow Regime Subsonic
Heat Transfer Static Temperature
Static Temperature 300 [K]
Mass And Momentum Normal Speed
Thermal Radiation Local Temperature
Turbulence Medium Intensity and Eddy Viscosity
Ratio
Table 4.5: Opening Boundary Conditions for Valveless Pulsejet
Boundary – (Air Inlet & Exhaust pipe)
Type OPENING
Settings
Component 𝐶3𝐻8
Mass Fraction 0
Component 𝐶𝑂2
Mass Fraction 0
Component 𝐻2𝑂
Mass Fraction 0
Component 𝑂2
Mass Fraction 0.21906
Flow Direction Normal to Boundary Condition
Flow Regime Subsonic
Heat Transfer Static Temperature
Static Temperature 300 [K]
Mass And Momentum Opening Pressure and Direction
Relative Pressure 1.0 [atm]
Thermal Radiation Local Temperature
Turbulence Medium Intensity and Eddy Viscosity
Ratio
Table 4.6: Wall Boundary Conditions for Valveless Pulsejet
Boundary –Walls of Pulsejet
Type WALL
Settings
Heat Transfer Adiabatic
Mass And Momentum No Slip Wall
Thermal Radiation Opaque
Diffuse Fraction 1
Emissivity 1
Wall Roughness Smooth Wall
38 Dr. T. Ahilan & C. Selvamani
Impact Factor (JCC): 8.8746 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Table 4.7: Air inlet velocity for various diameters (𝑣𝑎)
Diameter of Combustion Chamber
(𝑚𝑚) 𝑣𝑓 (𝑚/𝑠) 𝑣𝑎 (𝑚/𝑠)
70 20 24.6
80 20 20
90 20 14.8
5. ANALYSIS RESULTS
Figure 5.1: Density distribution for 70mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.2: Density Distribution Graph for 70mm Pulsejet.
Design and Simulation of Valveless Pulsejet Engine 39
www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]
Figure 5.3: Pressure Distribution for 70mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.4: Temperature Distribution for 70mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.5: Velocity distribution for 70mm Pulsejet.
40 Dr. T. Ahilan & C. Selvamani
Impact Factor (JCC): 8.8746 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Figure 5.6: Velocity distribution graph for 70mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.7: Density Distribution for 80mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.8: Density distribution graph for 80mm Pulsejet.
Design and Simulation of Valveless Pulsejet Engine 41
www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]
Figure 5.9: Pressure distribution for 80mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.10: Temperature distribution for 80mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.11: Velocity distribution for 80mm Pulsejet.
42 Dr. T. Ahilan & C. Selvamani
Impact Factor (JCC): 8.8746 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Figure 5.12: Velocity distribution graph for 80mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.13: Density distribution for 90mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.14: Density distribution graph for 90mm Pulsejet.
Design and Simulation of Valveless Pulsejet Engine 43
www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]
Figure 5.15: Pressure distribution for 90mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.16: Temperature distribution for 90mm Pulsejet.
Figure 5.17: Velocity distribution for 90mm Pulsejet.
44 Dr. T. Ahilan & C. Selvamani
Impact Factor (JCC): 8.8746 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Figure 5.18: Velocity distribution graph for 90mm Pulsejet.
Table 5.1: Thrust for various diameters
Diameter of Combustion Chamber
(𝑚𝑚)
Thrust
(𝑁)
70 3.10
80 39.97
90 8.26
6. CONCLUSIONS
The Valveless pulsejet engine is analyzed with different parameter such as Fuel Inlet, opening and wall boundary
conditions for Valveless pulsejet engine. Mesh details, Air inlet velocity, density, temperature and pressure distribution are
also analyzed for 70 mm, 80 mm and 90 mm pulsejet engine. Table 5.1 reveal that 80 mm diameter combustion chamber
have better thrust of 39.97 N when compared with 70 mm and 90 mm combustion chambers. For 80mm, we get the most
extreme thrust, as a result of ideal mass stream rate and burning chamber estimate. Subsequently, it is finished up that the
ideal incentive for burning chamber distance across is 80mm which is demonstrated with the assistance of recreation by
utilizing ANSYS R15.0.
REFERENCES
1. Valveless Pulsejet Engines, Ogorelec B., com/valveless/ (2002)
2. Computational Investigation of High Speed Pulsejets by Fei Zheng, Faculty of North Carolina State University
3. Experimental and numerical investigation of an 8-cm valveless pulsejet, April 2006. T. Geng, F. Zheng, A.P. Kiker, A.V.
Kuznetsov and W.L. Roberts
4. High Speed shadowgraph visualization of the unsteady flow phenomena in a valveless pulse jet engine. C Rajashekar, M
Janaki rami Reddy, H.S. Raghukumar, JJ Isaac, Propulsion Division National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore, India.
5. A historical review of valveless pulsejet designs by Bruno Ogorelec
6. Experimental Investigations of Liquid Fueled Pulsejet Engines. McCalley, Christian Talbot.
7. Simpson Bruce “The Enthusiasts' Guide to Pulsejet Engines” ttp://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/
8. Ejector Enhanced Pulsejet Based Pressure Gain Combustors: An Old Idea with a New Twist - Daniel E. Paxson Glenn
Design and Simulation of Valveless Pulsejet Engine 45
www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]
Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio
9. Lockheed Martin’s Samarai Nano Air Vehicle: Challenges, Research, and Realization” Steve Jameson1 and Dr. Kingsley
Fregene.
10. Manal A. Seif & Mona M. Nasr, “A Comparative Study of Assembling Methods of Nonwoven Bags Traditional Sewing vs
Welding Seaming”, International Journal of General Engineering and Technology (IJGET), Vol. 5, Issue 6, pp.7-22
11. K. K. Padghan, A. K. Pitale J. P. Modak & A. P. Narkhedkar, “Design and Analysis of CAD Based Human Powered
Flywheel”, BEST: International Journal of Management, Information Technology and Engineering (BEST: IJMITE), Vol. 2,
Issue 7, pp. 9-22
12. Suresh Pittala & Awash Tekle Tafere, “CFD Analysis for Linear Blade Cascade of a Turbine”, International Journal of
Mechanical Engineering (IJME), Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp. 37-46