Design Analysis VRV

download Design Analysis VRV

of 47

Transcript of Design Analysis VRV

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    1/47

    CHAPTER 4

    DESIGN ANALYSIS

    4.1 Overview

    Design is the creation of a plan or convention for the construction of an object or a

    system while analysis is the process of breaking a complex topic or substance into smaller parts

    in order to gain a better understanding of it.  This chapter will cover on the design of this system

     by conducting a cooling load study and perform the analysis.

    4.2 Cooling Load Cal!la"ion

    Internal and external cooling load is a vital criteria to estimate the building cooling load.

    Internal load can be described as heat produce by occupants, machine and lighting.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_(drawing)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_(norm)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complexityhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_(drawing)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_(norm)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complexity

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    2/47

    4.2.1 Solar Hea" Gain "#r! Gla$$

    The area of the house is on 1! north of the "arth#s e$uatorial plane. The house

    coordinate is %!&1'( latitude and 1!%&'". )sing window heat gain software, the values of 

    window heat gain in *tu+hr- unit can be obtained by key in the parameter such as window

    orientation, solar heat gain coefficient value /0- and latitude of the location. olar heat gain

    is influenced by the gla2ing type, the number of panes, and any glass coatings. olar heat gain of 

    gla2ing ranges from above 34 for uncoated water5white clear glass to less than 64 for 

    highly reflective coatings on tinted glass. 7 typical double5pane I0) has a /0 of around

    .8. This value decreases somewhat by adding a low5" coating and decreased substantially

    when adding a tint. In this project, all windows is covered with tint and assuming clearness and

    sunshine percentage is 1 and 14, type of concrete is old surface and /0 value is .66, the

    solar heat gain is available in 7ppendix 6 as well as (9: label (ational 9enestration :ating

    ouncil). *ase on building survey, all windows are exposing to the sunlight and each of the solar 

    gain will be calculated accordingly. 9rom 7ppendix 6, the solar heat gain occurring in ;ay at

    16? *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 6.@6 B @.6> = 1@.>6 ft6

     /ence

     $s  = >?B1@.>6 = @,>@&.3 *tu+hr 

    http://www.commercialwindows.org/reflective.phphttp://www.commercialwindows.org/lowe-phphttp://www.commercialwindows.org/tint.phphttp://www.commercialwindows.org/reflective.phphttp://www.commercialwindows.org/lowe-phphttp://www.commercialwindows.org/tint.php

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    3/47

    ;aster *edroom window 1! (orth of "ast-

    0iven,

    ) = >? *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = >.63 B @.%@ = 61.%6 ft6

     /ence

     $s  = >?B61.%6 = 3,>?6.3 *tu+hr 

    *edroom C6 window 1! outh of Aest-

    0iven,

    ) = >@ *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

     /ence

     $s  = >@B11.3? = &,63.& *tu+hr 

    *edroom C> window 1! outh of Aest-

    0iven,

    ) = >@ *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

     /ence

     $s  = >@B11.3? = &,63.& *tu+hr 

    *edroom C& window 1! outh of Aest-

    0iven,

    ) = >@ *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 1.@& B &.%? = 8.%> ft6

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    4/47

     /ence

     $s  = >@B8.%> = 6,81.3 *tu+hr 

    Dining /all window 1! outh of Aest-

    0iven,

    ) = >@ *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = @.%@ B @.3? = &%.6 ft6

     /ence

     $s  = >@B&%.6 = 1@,686 *tu+hr 

    9amily 7rea window 1! outh of Aest-

    0iven,

    ) = >@ *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 1.@& B &.@ = 8.%&& ft6

     /ence

     $s  = >@B8.%&& = 6,81%.3& *tu+hr 

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    5/47

    4.2.2 Hea" Gain "#r! %all and Roo& 

    Aalls and :oofs can have an important effect on interior comfort conditions in both the

    residential and non5residential sectors. Aalls and roofs come into direct contact with the exterior 

    environmental conditions. everal factors can be utili2ed to reduce energy consumption and

    improve interior comfort conditions. ight colored exterior walls can help to reduce interior 

    temperatures by reducing solar heat gain. In addition, shade trees and bushes can reduce this heat

    gain. 9or roof, insulation in the attic is important because the attic is a large source of heat gain

    from the roof.

    Total "$uivalent Temperature Difference T"TD- is used to account for the added heat

    transfer due to the sun shining on exterior walls, roofs, and windows, and the capacity of the wall

    and roof to store heat. The T"TD is substituted for ∆T in the e$uation for conduction. 9or this

     project, a heat transfer software will be used to determine the heat gain through wall and roof.

    :esistance value :-, which is thermal resistance of a material that will be used is determine by

    the material itself and for this case the wall is common brick type which give :=.3 and roof is

    ceramic tile which give : = 6.>1. :eferring to 7ppendix 6, the e$uivalent temperature difference"TD- for all areas occurring at 16pm is and transmission coefficient )- for @ inch thickness of 

    medium weight concrete, define as below-

    :oof< ) = .18

    The cooling load calculation for wall that expose to the sunlight is describe as below

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    6/47

    Aall TD

    ;ain /all 5 Aall 1! (orth of "ast-

    0iven,

    ) = .>? , "TD = 8>%.>

    /ence

     $s  = .>?B8>%.> = [email protected] *tu+hr 

    Dining /all 5 Aall 1! (orth of "ast-

    0iven,

    ) = .>? , "TD = &81.6

    /ence

     $s  = .>?B&81.6 = 13>.88 *tu+hr 

    9amily 7rea 5 Aall 1! (orth of "ast-

    0iven,

    ) = .>? , "TD = 13

    /ence

     $s  = .>?B13 = 86 *tu+hr 

    ;aster bedroom 5 Aall 1! (orth of "ast-

    0iven,

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    7/47

    ) = .>? , "TD = 1686.

    /ence

     $s  = .>?B1686. = &[email protected] *tu+hr 

    *edroom C6 5 Aall 1! (orth of "ast-

    0iven,

    ) = .>? , "TD = &81.6

    /ence

     $s  = .>?B&81.6 = 13>.88 *tu+hr 

    :oof TD

    ;aster *edroom roof 

    0iven,

    ) = .18 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = >.63 B @.%@ = 61.%6 ft6

     /ence

     $s  = .18B61.%6B&@8%.> = 18,1&.11 *tu+hr 

    *edroom C6 roof 

    0iven,

    ) = .18 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    8/47

     /ence

     $s  = .18B11.3?B&@8%.> = ?&%.13 *tu+hr 

    *edroom C> roof 1! outh of Aest-

    0iven,

    ) = .18 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

     /ence

     $s  = .18B11.3?B&@8%.> = ?,&%.13 *tu+hr 

    4.2.' Hea" Gain "#r! Ceiling and (loor

    The transmission coefficient for ceiling and floor can be found from 7ppendix 6. 7ccording

    to the transmission coefficient table, the ) value for bottom and top surface is .@1 *tu+hr-

    s$.ft- while outdoor and indoor temperature are >! 3@- and 6@! 83.3- respectively. The

    total of heat gain thru ceiling and floor is as below = 1@.>6 ft6

     /ence

     $s  = .@1B1@.>[email protected] = 81.@8 *tu+hr 

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    9/47

    ;aster *edroom eiling and 9loor 

    0iven,

    ) = .@1 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = >.63 B @.%@ = 61.%6 ft6

     /ence

     $s  = .@1B61.%[email protected] = ?&.%6 *tu+hr 

    *edroom C6 eiling and 9loor 

    0iven,

    ) = .@1 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

     /ence

     $s  = [email protected][email protected] = %6.66 *tu+hr 

    *edroom C> eiling and 9loor 

    0iven,

    ) = .@1 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

     /ence

     $s  = [email protected][email protected] = %6.66 *tu+hr 

    *edroom C& eiling and 9loor 

    0iven,

    ) = .@1 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 1.@& B &.%? = 8.%> ft6

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    10/47

     /ence

     $s  = .@1B8.%>[email protected] = >>.8 *tu+hr 

    Dining /all eiling and 9loor 

    0iven,

    ) = .@1 *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = @.%@ B @.3? = &%.6 ft6

     /ence

     $s  = .@1B&%[email protected] = 1?3.%6 *tu+hr 

    9amily 7rea eiling and 9loor 

    0iven,

    ) = >@ *tu+hr-s$.ft-, 7 = 1.@& B &.@ = 8.%&& ft6

     /ence

     $s  = .@1B8.%&&[email protected] = >>.1> *tu+hr 

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    11/47

    4.2.4 Hea" Gain &ro) Peo*le

    The heat gain come from people consist of two types which are sensible and latent heat. The

    calculation is based on 7ppendix 6. In building survey, the maximum of person that stay in this

    house are four &- people. The example calculation as below

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    12/47

    *edroom C6

    "stimate number of people will occupied at this area is at a time is 6,

    Es= 6B61 = &6

    $= 6B1& = 63

    *edroom C>

    "stimate number of people will occupied at this area at a time is 1,

    Es= 1B61 = 61

    $= 1B1& = 1&

    *edroom C&

    "stimate number of people will occupied at this area at a time is 1,

    Es= 1B61 = 61

    $= 1B1& = 1&

    Dining /all

    "stimate number of people will occupied at this area at a time is @,

    Es= @B61 = 16@

    $= @B1& = 3&

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    13/47

    9amily 7rea

    "stimate number of people will occupied at this area at a time is &,

    Es= &B61 = 3&

    $= &B1& = %@

    4.2.+ Hea" Gain &ro) Lig#"ing S,$"e)

    /eat gain from lighting can be determined using e$uation E=A x >.& x *9 x 9.

    7ccording to 7ppendix 6, the fluorescent lamp has typical value of 1.% A+s$.ft. *elow is the

    calculation for sensible heat gain by lighting = 1@.>6 ft6

    $s  = 1.%B1@.>6B1.6%B>.&1= 1&.>% *tu+hr 

    ;aster *edroom

    7 = >.63 B @.%@ = 61.%6 ft6

    $s  = 1.%B61.%6B1.6%B>.&1= 1>8.%? *tu+hr 

    *edroom C6

    7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    14/47

    $s  = 1.%B11.3?B1.6%B>.&1= [email protected] *tu+hr 

    *edroom C>

    7 = 6.1> B %.%3 = 11.3? ft6

    $s  = 1.%B11.3?B1.6%B>.&1= [email protected] *tu+hr 

    *edroom C&

    7 = 1.@& B &.%? = 8.%> ft6

    $s  = 1.%B8.%>B1.6%B>.&1= &3.1& *tu+hr 

    Dining /all

    7 = @.%@ B @.3? = &%.6 ft6

    $s  = 1.%B&%.6B1.6%B>.&1= 63?. *tu+hr 

    9amily 7rea

    7 = 1.@& B &.@ = 8.%&& ft6

    $s  = 1.%B8.%&&B1.6%B>.&1= &3.6> *tu+hr 

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    15/47

    4.' Sele"ion o& S,$"e)

    7fter the entire cooling load has been determined for each area, the next step is to find the

    total cooling load for entire house. The total cooling load will help to determine the selection of 

    F:F model that suitable with the load. This is important due to undersi2e of the system will

    cause the desired temperature unable to achieve and oversi2e the system will cause the waste of 

    energy. Table &.1 show the list of the cooling load for each area and the total cooling load for 

    entire house.

    Ta-le 4.1 ummari2ed of ooling oad

    (loor Loa"ion

    T,*e o& Cooling Ca*ai", /0"!#r To"alCooling

    Ca*ai",

    /0"!#r%indow %all Roo&  

    Ceiling

    and

    &loor Peo*le Lig#"

    1

    ;ain /all @,>@&.3 [email protected] (7 81.@8 6,1 1&.>% 3,?68.%?

    Dining /all 1@,686 13>.3 (7 1?3.%6 6,1 63?. 1?,&>.6?

    9amily 7rea 6,81%.3& 86. (7 >>.1> 1& &3.6> &,3??.6

    *edroom C& 6,81.3

     (7 (7

    >>.8

    >% &3.1&

    >,1&6.1

    6;aster*edroom 3,>?6.3 &[email protected] 18,1&.11 ?&.%6 8 1>8.%? 6@,?6%.1

    *edroom C6 &,63.& 13>.3 ?&%.13 %6.66 8 [email protected] 1&,8&6.%?

    *edroom C> &,63.& (7 ?,&%.13 %6.66 >% [email protected] 1&,63.36 

    To"al 31555.67

     

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    16/47

    7s per table &.1, total cooling load is ?1,333.@ *tu+hr without considering any safety

    factor. afety factor is to be applied to all rooms to cover up the error of the calculation. To get

    an ideal and effective air conditioner system, safety factor of 14 is applied. The value after 

    adding 14 safety factor are called "ffective :oom Total /eat ":T/-. Table &.6 determine the

    actual total capacity after safety factor of 14 is applied.

    Ta-le 4.2 E&&e"ive Roo) Cooling Load

    (loor Loa"ion

    To"al Cooling

    Ca*ai",

    /0"!#r

    E&&e"ive Roo)

    Cooling Load

    /0"!Hr

    1

    ;ain /all 3,?68.%? ?,36.>%

    Dining /all 1?,&>.6? 6,?&8.@6

    9amily 7rea &,3??.6 %,>3?.16

    *edroom C& >,1&6.1 >,&%@.61

    6

    ;aster

    *edroom 6@,?6%.1 6?,@18.@1

    *edroom C6 1&,8&6.%? 1@,[email protected]%

    *edroom C> 1&,63.36 1%,@6?.8

      TOTAL ?1333.@ 11,88.&@

    7fter safety factor been applied to the existing cooling, the new total cooling load is 11,88.&@

    *tu+hr. The selection of the model will be based on comparison of design capacity of that model

    versus cooling load re$uired by the house. 7fter some survey and market research, Daikin F:F

    system with model number :GE16T/H1"-  is suitable since this model provide cooling

    capacity up to 11&, *tu+hr and maximum of indoor unit that can be connected is 6.

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    17/47

    Table &.61 shows the specification for Daikin F:F model :GE16T/H1"-. 7s per 

     below specification, the recommended total pipe length is >,63 ft and the weight for outdoor 

    unit itself is 13% kg. 7lthough manufacturers routinely increase the maximum allowable

    refrigerant pipe run, the longer the lengths of refrigerant pipes, the more expensive the initial and

    operating costs. 9or most F:F units, the maximum allowable vertical distance between an

    outdoor unit and its farthest indoor unit is approximately 1% ft &@ m-. The maximum

     permissible vertical distance between two individual indoor units is approximately &% ft 1& m-

    and the maximum actual refrigerant piping lengths allowable between outdoor and farthest

    indoor units is up to &? ft 1&? m-. 9or indoor unit, there are & models that need to be used base

    on cooling load re$uirement. Indoor units are available in multiple configurations such as wall5

    mounted, ceiling5mounted cassette suspended, and concealed ducted types. 9or this project, wall

    mounted type has been choose due to flexibility and ease of installation. tarting from 8,%

    *tu+hr to >, *tu+hr cooling capacity will be used to cool down from >,&%@.61 *tu+hr up to

    6?,@18.@1 *tu+hr cooling load. The list of indoor unit as indicate in table &.6.1.

    Ta-le 4.2.1 Li$" o& Indoor !ni"

    Model Type Cooling CapacityFXAQ07P Wall mounted type 7500

    FXAQ09P Wall mounted type 9500FXAQ18P Wall mounted type 18000FXAQ30P Wall mounted type 30000

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    18/47

    Ta-le 4.2.2 S*ei&ia"ion &or O!"door Dai8in 9R9

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    19/47

    Ta-le 4.2.2 S*ei&ia"ion &or Indoor Dai8in 9R9 /(:A;7

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    20/47

    Ta-le 4.2.' S*ei&ia"ion &or Indoor Dai8in 9R9 /(:A;73P

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    21/47

    Ta-le 4.2.+ S*ei&ia"ion &or Indoor Dai8in 9R9 /(:A;15P

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    22/47

    4.'.1 Co$" Anal,$i$

    *elow table is total cost to purchase indoor and outdoor unit for Daikin F:F 1J.

    Quantity Location

    Indoor    Outdoor   

    Model/ Type

    RatedCoolingCapacity(Btu/h)

    Price(RM)

      Quantity Model

    RatedCoolingCapacity(Btu/h)

    Price(RM)

    1 Main Hall

    FXAQ09P

    9500 2,187

     

    1 RXQ12THY1€ 114,000 28,500

    Wall mount!t"#

     

    1 $inin% Hall

    FXAQ18P

    18000 &,000

     

    Wall mount!t"#

     

    1 'it(n

    FXAQ07P

    7500 1,820

     

    Wall mount!t"#

     

    1*!+oom

    4

    FXAQ07P

    7500 1,820

     

    Wall mount!t"#

     

    1Ma-t+ 

    *!+oom

    FXAQ&0P

    &0000 4,551

     

    Wall mount!t"#  

    1*!+oom

    2

    FXAQ12P

    18000 &,000

     

    Wall mount!t"#

     

    1*!+oom

    2

    FXAQ12P

    18000 &,000

     

    Wall mount!t"#

     

    .u/ Total 108,500 19,&78 

    114,000 28,500 

    +an! Total n!oo+ 3ut!oo+ RM) 47,878 

    *elow table is installation cost for F:F

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    23/47

    ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY  

    AMOUNTBEFORE GSTRM!

    AMOUNTAFTERGSTRM!

    A

    Supply materal and manpo!er ton"tall ndoor and outdoor #ara$le

    %e&r'erant #olume ()! a((e""ore",*ttn'", ppe !or+", (ondut !rn',

    $ra(+et and "upport &or Floo" # -all,nn', Famly Area and /edroom 4.

    otal re&r'erant ppe len'tappromately 204&t otal

    manpo!er " 4

    6ot 1 5,133 5,441

    /

    Supply materal and manpo!er ton"tall ndoor and outdoor #ara$le

    %e&r'erant #olume ()! a((e""ore",*ttn'", ppe !or+", (ondut !rn',

    $ra(+et and "upport &or Floo" $a"ter /edroom, /edroom 2 and

    /edroom 3.otal re&r'erant ppe len'tappromately 71&t otal

    manpo!er " 4

    6ot 1 4,387 4,50

      e"tn' and omm""onn' 6ot 1 1,500 1,590

      :rand otal 11,020 11,81

    *elow table is operational cost for F:F

      odel

    Po!eron"umpton

    -our"perday

    ;ner'yon"umpton

    per year +!

    % peryear

    Main Hall

    FXAQ09P 30 Watt 9 98.55 21.4

    Wall mount!t"#  

    $inin%Hall

    FXAQ18P 30 Watt 9 98.55 21.4Wall mount!t"#  

    Famil" A+a

    FXAQ07P 20 Watt 9 5.7 14Wall mount!t"#  

    *!+oom4

    FXAQ07P 20 Watt 9 5.7 14Wall mount!t"#  

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    24/47

    Ma-t+ *!+oom

    FXAQ&0P 70 Watt 9 229.95 53.Wall mount!t"#  

    *!+oom2

    FXAQ12P 30 Watt 9 98.55 21.4Wall mount!t"#  

    *!+oom2

    FXAQ12P 30 Watt 9 98.55 21.4Wall mount!t"#  

    3ut!oo+ nit

    RXQ12THY16 9.2

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    25/47

    %epla(e=AS &an$earn'" 10 1 140 337 49

    %epla(ere&r'erant 10 8 70 133 220Su$totalrepar)repla(e 1,392

     otal%> 3,777

    9igure :efrigerant pipes must remain clean, dry, and leak free. Ahen stored prior to

    installation, the edges of refrigerant pipes need to be sealed. (itrogen gas must be used during

    welding to prevent oxidation of the interiors of refrigerant pipes. 7 detailed installation manual

    must be followed. The installer should be familiar with the control options available for F:9

    systems. "ach individual indoor unit can be controlled by a programmable thermostat or a

    multiple indoor units serving the same 2one can be controlled by the same thermostat.

    *elow table is total cost to purchase split aircond

    Quantity Location

      Model  

    Brand Indoor  

    RatedCoolingCapacity(Btu/h)

    Pricebefore

    !T (RM)

    Price after !T (RM)

    1 Main Hall

    *.Q09*8A5

    9500 &,82 4,05Wall mount!t"#

    1$inin%Hall

    Pana-oni(

    P:18H'F

    18000 4,01 4,257Wall mount!t"#

    1Famil" A+a

     AR07&.*4

    7500 &,179 3,370Wall mount!t"#

    1*!+oom

    4

     AR07&.*4

    7500 &,179 3,370Wall mount!t"#

    1Ma-t+ 

    *!+oom

    .&07H;&

    &0000 7,255 7,90Wall mount!t"#

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    26/47

    1*!+oom

    2

    .120H6;

    12000 &,788 4,015Wall mount!t"#

    1*!+oom

    &

    .120H6;

    12000 &,788 4,015Wall mount!t"#

    Total 9,500 29,0&1 &0,77&

    Total Price after !T +,-..+

    Installation cost for plit 7

    ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY  

    AMOUNTBEFOREGSTRM!

    AMOUNTAFTERGSTRM!

    A

    Supply materal and manpo!er ton"tall ndoor and outdoor Splt unt()! a((e""ore", *ttn'", ppe !or+",(ondut !rn', $ra(+et and "upport &orFloor 1 -all, nn', Famly Area and/edroom 4.otal manpo!er " 4 %150)ead

    Wrn' %250)unt

    6ot 1 3,850 4,081

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    27/47

    /

    Supply materal and manpo!er ton"tall ndoor and outdoor Splt unt()! a((e""ore", *ttn'", ppe !or+",(ondut !rn', $ra(+et and "upport &orFloor 2 a"ter /edroom, /edroom 2and /edroom 3.

    otal manpo!er " 4 %150)eadWrn' %250)unt

    6ot 1 3,100 3,28

      e"tn' and omm""onn' 6ot 1 1,500 1,590

      :rand otal 8,450 8,957

    Kperational cost for plit 7

     

    Model B"andPo/e"

    Con%*&ption 0/!

    1o*"%

    pe"day

    Ene"gyCon%*&ption pe"

    yea"0/2!

    RM pe"yea"

    Main "all

    *.Q09*8A5

    2.8 9 9198 2,005Wall mount!t"#  

    #ining

    "all

    P:18H'F

    Pana-oni(

    5.28 9 17344 3,780

    Wall mount!t"#  

    $a%ily&rea

     AR07&.*4

    2.1 9 898 1,503

    Wall mount!t"#  

    Bedroo%'

    FXAQ07P;

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    28/47

    *elow table is total cost for repair and maintenance for plit 7

    Co%t Ite&%

    Pe"iodyea"% Qty'

    (a)o"Co%tRM!

    Mate"ial Co%tRM!

    Ann*alCo%tRM!

    Maintenance  %epla(e ar*lter"ndoor

    0.5 7 35 154 504

    e(+)(lean

    &an (ol(onden"ate"y"tem"

    1 7 105 280 393

    %epla(e ar*lter"outdoor

    1 7 84 175 27

    Su$totalmantenan(e

      1,14

    Repair/Replace  Fan (ol

    motorrepla(ement 10 7 490 3000 392

    %epla(e(apa(tor 10 7 35 315 37%epla(etermo"en"or 10 7 35 140 19

    %epla(ere&r'erant 10 7 105 980 118Su$totalrepar)repla(

    e 57 otal%> 1,730

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    29/47

    CHAPTER +

    DISC=SSION

    +.1 In"rod!"ion

    It is important to know how much the total of the cooling load of a project so that a good

    selection can be done and to avoid waste. Aith the availability of calculation and formula, the

    cooling load of each area can be determined. Knce the total of cooling load has been discovered,

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    30/47

    then only searching activity for the suitable system can be done. "very manufacturer will provide

    information such as cooling load capacity of a model. Ahen the differentiation between cooling

    load re$uirement and cooling load capacity is executed, then only the specific model can be

    selected by choosing the lesser of the differentiation so that the efficiency can be maintained and

    optimi2ed.

    +.2 Co)*ari$on o& Ca*i"al Co$" -e"ween 9R9 and S*li" AC

    (ig!re +.1 < apital ost omparison

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    31/47

    9igure %.1 is comparison chart between F:F and plit 7 for total capital cost. 9or 

    initial cost, the F:F capital cost is 164 or :; %,@? higher than plit 7 due to the price of 

    outdoor F:F it is expensive. /owever the final decision for system selection will be based on

    operational cost and :eturn on Investment :KI-.

    +.' Co)*ari$on o& Re*air and >ain"enane Co$" -e"ween 9R9 and S*li" AC

    (ig!re +.2 Re*air and >ain"enane Co$" Co)*ari$on

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    32/47

    9igure %.6 shows a comparison of repair and maintenance cost between variable

    refrigerant volume and split air conditioner. The information is obtained from Daikin and 0

    /F7 website 6J. (ormal maintenance for a F:F, similar to that of any DG system, consists

    mainly of changing filters and cleaning coils. The large number of compressors in a F:F may

    create a higher probability of compressor failure, although the redundancy also leads >J.  *oth

    systems will be schedule to service every @ month and annually based on the preventive

    maintenance schedule. In this case, the service cost for F:F is :; @1 higher than split 7 due

    to price of material and labor cost as F:F is more high technology than split 7. 9or repair cost,

    the recommendation is to replace every 1 years and the amount has been divided accordingly so

    that 1 year of service cost can be figured out. This comparison is applicable for 1 year of service

    and :KI will be calculated for 1 years of service to determine which system is most profitable.

    +.4 Co)*ari$on o& Energ, Con$!)*"ion -e"ween 9R9 and S*li" AC

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    33/47

    (ig!re +.4 Energ, Con$!)*"ion Co)*ari$on

    The energy efficiency of F:F systems derives from several factors. The F:9 essentially

    eliminates duct losses, which are often estimated to be between 14 to 64 of total airflow in a

    ducted system.> F:F systems typically include two to three compressors, one of which is

    variable speed, in each condensing unit, enabling wide capacity modulation. This approach

    yields high part5load efficiency, which translates into high seasonal energy efficiency, because

    /F7 systems typically spend most of their operating hours in the range of &4 to 34 of 

    maximum capacity >J. 9rom figure %.&, it is very obvious that the indoor F:F unit consume

    very less energy compared with split 7 and this give a maximum saving in electricity. The F:F

    outdoor unit may consume more energy, but it#s still much lower than split 7.

    +.+ Co)*ari$on o& O*era"ional Co$" -e"ween 9R9 and S*li" AC

    (ig!re +.+ Kperational ost omparison

    9igure %.% shows a comparison of operational cost between F:F and split air conditioner 

    system. The total operating hours in one year is estimated as >6& hours including public

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    34/47

    holidays and weekends. In this case, F:F system has a lower operational cost compared to split

    air conditioner. Kperational cost of F:F for one year is :; 8,68 while operational cost for split

    air conditioner in one year is :; 16,&%. In one year, cost saving of :; %,&6> could be

    generated if F:F system is been used.

    +.6 Co)*ari$on o& Overall Co$" -e"ween 9R9 and S*li" AC

    (ig!re +.6 Overall Co)*ari$on Co$" &or 1 Year

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    35/47

    In many cases, the initial cost of a F:9 system is higher than that of a split air 

    conditioner system. 9igure %.@ is comparison chart between F:F and plit 7 for overall cost in

    one year operation. The F:F system is spending approximately :; 6>,%> higher than split air 

    conditioner and this is normal due to the F:F system depend on payback period in order to gain

    saving. This overall cost is calculated for 1 year period, including capital cost which gives an

    advantage to split air conditioner system. 9or long term standpoint and to gain back the F:F

    investment, an :KI analysis is re$uired.

    +.6 Re"!rn on Inve$")en" anal,$i$

    ROI 3 #, Yea"%

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    36/47

    (ig!re +.6 Re"!rn on Inve$")en"

    :eturn on investment :KI- is the benefit to an investor resulting from an investment of 

    some resource. 7 high :KI means the investment gains compare favorably to investment cost. 7s

    a performance measure, :KI is used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or to compare

    the efficiency of a number of different investments &J. 9igure %.@ shows that F:F is able to

    return back the capital investment in 1 years and generate tremendous saving after the said

     period. The saving is calculated based on operational cost saving minus the maintenance cost.

    Ahen the net cost saving is obtained, it will accumulate every year and :KI is achievable at 1

    years. Aithout doubt, the efficiency of F:F system is proven by generating an operational cost

    saving every year.

    +.< Sele"ion o& Air Condi"ioning $,$"e)

    Kbservation from table &.1, the total cooling load is ?1,333.@ *tu+hr and the total

    effective cooling load is 11,88.&@ *tu+hr in order to provide cooling for a 6 storey terrace

    house that have a built up 1 s$+ft. 9rom the table it can be seen also that the heat gain

    through the wall has the highest value due to material of the wall is poured concrete 3 lb+ft> with

    thickness @ inches. The most important factor in finali2ing the selection is to make the cost

    comparison. Knce the specification of a model has met the re$uirement of the project, purchase

    cost can be obtained by doing internet survey or directly contact with the supplier.

    Ahen the purchase cost for F:F and split unit is available, the cost of installation can be

    obtained by engaging the $ualified contractor that has experience installing this system. Ahen all

    the costs are available, comparison can be made by checking which system has lowered cost and

    suitable with this project. *ased on the analysis performed, the most suitable air conditioning

    system for this project is variable refrigerant volume because is more cost effective compared to

    split air conditioner. The F:F is capable to save :; &,366 yearly, return back the investment in

    1 years and generate :; &3,66 cost saving after 6 years of operation.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investmenthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    37/47

    CHAPTER 6

    CONCL=SION AND RECO>>ENDATION

    F:F systems offer controls that match the space cooling loads to that of the indoor coil

    over a range of operation. Fariable speed compressors and fans in the outdoor units modulate

    their speed, saving energy at part5load conditions. Kutdoor sections should be si2ed to match

     building peak loads, not the sum of the peak load for each 2one, reducing the capacity of outdoor 

    units when compared to a conventional unitary system. The system offers designers and

    occupants the ability to choose multiple individuali2ed 2ones, which improves system

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    38/47

    controllability. The system capabilities and limitations should be evaluated carefully to determine

    the suitability of the F:F for a project and to optimi2e its design.

    APPENDI: 2

    olar heat gain table for cooling load calculation

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    39/47

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    40/47

    etting for window orientation at 1! (orth of "ast

    olar /eat 0ain value from Lanuary to December for 1! ( of " orientation

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    41/47

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    42/47

    etting for window orientation at 1! outh of Aest

    olar /eat 0ain value from Lanuary to December for 1! of A orientation

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    43/47

    : Falue for ommon *rick 

    oftware for /eat Transfer through ;aterial

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    44/47

    Transmission coefficient of ommon *uilding ;aterial

    : Falue for :oofing

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    45/47

    Thermal onductivity )- for 7sbestos5cement :oof 

    Transmission oefficient for eiling and 9loor 

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    46/47

    :eference

     1J http???@a-+a@o+%>Fil20i/+a+">!o(i/>@@@>20070&27B%otCl+@#!D 

    &J https

  • 8/16/2019 Design Analysis VRV

    47/47