description: tags: iffnew2
-
Upload
anon-703586 -
Category
Documents
-
view
66 -
download
3
Transcript of description: tags: iffnew2
Library Research: 1983-1997A Report to the National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and LifelongLearning and the National Library of Education, Office of Educational Research and
Improvement, U.S. Department of Education
Table of Contents
Executive Summary........................................................................................................ iiFindings........................................................................................................................ 1Background................................................................................................................... 1Key Findings -- Priorities ................................................................................................. 5Key Findings -- Funding .................................................................................................. 7Conclusions................................................................................................................... 8Recommendations.......................................................................................................... 10The Digital Library Initiative ............................................................................................ 13Research Methodology.................................................................................................... 15The Data....................................................................................................................... 22Funded Projects and Research Priorities............................................................................ 61
List of Tables
Table I: Research Priorities…………………………………………………………………………….2Table II: Consolidated Priorities……………………………………………………………………… . . 3Table III: Distribution of Research by Priority…………………………………………………………5Table IVA: Federally funded library research ..................................................................... 22Table IVB: Privately funded library research ...................................................................... 27Table VA: Journal articles............................................................................................... 42Table VB: Dissertations and other unpublished studies ...................................................... 56
List of Matrices
Matrix A: Federally funded programs and research priorities.............................................. 61Matrix B: Privately funded programs and research priorities .............................................. 66
List of Figures
Figure 1: Library Research Priorities: 1983-1997………………………………………………………5Figure 2: Library Research: Federal and Non-Federal Funding………………………………………8
Library Research: 1983-1997
A Report to
U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement
The National Institute on Postsecondary Education,Libraries, and Lifelong Learning
and
The National Library of Education
From
Libraries for the Future121 West 27th Street
New York, New York 10001(212) 352-2330
ii
Library Research: 1983-1997
Executive Summary
This report was commissioned by the National Institute on Postsecondary Education,Libraries, and Lifelong Learning (PLLI) and The National Library of Education (NLE),Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Educationto serve as the basis for decisions concerning continued U. S. Department of Educationsupport for library research. We have sought to inform that process by describing twoearlier efforts in OERI to establish a research agenda and comparing the prioritiesestablished at that time to research since accomplished. We have also examined Federaland non-Federal funding trends and compared those with the OERI priorities. Based onthis data and its analysis, we have made recommendations for the U. S. Department ofEducation in regard to library research policy.
In 1982, A Library and Information Science Research Agenda for the 1980s (henceforth,“Cuadra Report”) documented a project sponsored by OERI that developed a “researchagenda” through a process involving 26 researchers and practitioners, selected torepresent the leadership of the field. A later document, Rethinking the Library, wasbased on yet another project sponsored by OERI in 1986-87 consisting of a series of fourmeetings at which field-nominated experts identified issues they considered mostimportant to the profession. Research priorities from these two projects wereconsolidated for this report and used as a basis for comparison with subsequent libraryresearch.
Library research projects from 1983 to 1997 were collected and compared to the 1980spriorities that emerged from the two initiatives mentioned above. These includedFederally-funded projects, non-Federally funded projects, unfunded published studies,and unfunded unpublished studies. It was found that:
• Some of the 1980s priorities were frequently met by the research studies;others were less frequently met. There were no indications that the priorities,as a group, affected the direction of research.
On the other hand,
• A comparison of “priorities” met by the surveyed library research shows aremarkable coincidence in the percentage of projects groupable under specificpriorities between those projects funded by the Federal government and thoseprivately funded, while there are quite different distributions for publishedresearch and unpublished (dissertations, conference papers, etc.) research.
In regard to funding patterns, it was found that:
iii
• Total Federal funding for library research since 1983 has been approximatelythree and a quarter million dollars. In other words, total Federal support forlibrary research has averaged less than $275,000 per year.
• Annual Federal funding for the entire period to all library research projectshas been approximately one-quarter of the typical annual funding of OERInational centers of research in other topics.
• Federal funding for library research peaked in 1987. As funding fromtraditional sources, such as the Department of Education, has declined, so hasthe amount of research on traditional areas involving physical collections,their use and access.
• Total non-Federal funding for library research since 1983 has been under $6million ($5,593,797), or approximately $430,000 per year.
• Total funding for library research, Federal and private, has averaged less thanthree-quarters of a million dollars per year since 1983.
• In recent years, funding for library research from other Federal agencies,including the Department of Defense, and from two large private foundations,has sharply increased in the specific research area of digital or electroniclibrary planning.
The unfocused nature of library research in the period 1983-1997, the decline in researchsupport from traditional sources, the relatively low level of federal support in relation toother research areas advanced through National Research Centers, and recent shifts inresearch support towards electronic library issues, all suggest the need for a coordinatednational agenda for library research. Recommendations include:
• Develop a national library research policy and capacity.
• Develop a Federal -- interdepartmental -- library research policy.
• Develop a National Center for Library Research, modeled after other U.S.Department of Education research centers, to provide national and Federal leadershipin library research. The National Center for Library Research should be closelylinked to both the National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, andLifelong Learning and the National Library of Education, with strong liaisonrelationships with the National Science Foundation and other Federal funders oflibrary research, especially the Institute for Museum and Library Services, theNational Endowment for the Humanities and the United States National Commissionon Libraries and Information Science.
1
Library Research: 1983-1997
Findings
Background
The following analysis of library research emerged from a concern in the field, shared byOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) officers, regarding the paucityof research on public libraries and the perceived lack of a research agenda for the nation’slibraries. This is not a new concern. In 1982 A Library and Information ScienceResearch Agenda for the 1980s (henceforth, “Cuadra Report”) documented a projectconducted for the Department of Education, Office of Libraries and LearningTechnologies, under the direction of Dr. Carlos A. Cuadra, President of CuadraAssociates. The project developed a “research agenda” through a process involving 26researchers and practitioners, selected to represent the leadership of the field. Theintention of those planning the project was that the research agenda developed would bethe basis for planning of public investments in library research. The process included athree-day meeting during which the project participants identified a research agendabased on submissions from the fifteen researchers among the project participants who hadeach developed approximately six proposed research projects. The research agenda thatresulted was thought proper to “guide and support the allocation and targeting of presentand prospective research funds.”
Then, in 1986-87, OERI, through the Office of Library Programs, held a series of fourmeetings at which field-nominated library experts identified issues they considered mostimportant to the library profession. Office of Library Program staff then developed a listof the major issues. The resulting study, Rethinking the Library in the Information Age:Issues in Library Research -- An Agenda for the 1990s (1989), “was designed to identifyresearchable issues that could help libraries attain -- or maintain -- a position ofleadership in the information society.”
The present report was commissioned to review the match between those past prioritiesand the actual research conducted; determine emerging research topics, and serve as thebasis for decisions concerning the establishment of a new research agenda and continuedU. S. Department of Education support for library research. We have sought to informthat process by describing the two earlier efforts to establish a research agenda andcomparing the priorities established at that time to research since accomplished. Becausethe Cuadra research agenda was completed in 1982, it was determined that we shouldexamine research from 1983 on. We have also examined funding trends and comparedthose with those same priorities. Based on this data and its analysis, we have maderecommendations for the U. S. Department of Education in regard to library researchpolicy.
2
Table I lists the research priorities that emerged from the Cuadra Report and Rethinkingthe Library and notes those which are similar in each.
Table I: Research Priorities
Report Priority Common to both?Cuadra (1982)C1. Information Generation and
Provision of InformationServices
C2. Information Users and Uses (RL 9)C3. Planning and Evaluation of
Library and InformationServices/Systems
C4. Economics of Informationand of Library andInformation Services
(RL 7)
C5. Education and ProfessionalIssues
(RL 2 & RL 8)
C6. Intellectual Freedom
Rethinking the Library(1989)RL1. Policy issues: federal, state,
and local roles andresponsibilities
RL2. Education and training oflibrarians
(C5)
RL3. Access to informationRL4. Archives and preservationRL5. Organizing, indexing, and
retrieving materialsRL6. Role of the public services
librarianRL7. Library funding and
economics(C4)
RL8. Libraries and education (C5)RL9. Information users and needs (C2)RL10. Library models
3
The priorities developed by the two 1980s reports have been combined and coded for thepurposes of this study. Table II consolidates the sixteen priorities from the two reports(Cuadra Report = C; Rethinking Library = RL) and assigns them twelve reference letters:
Table II: Consolidated Priorities
a. b. c. d. e. f.C1 C2
RL9C3 C4
RL7C5RL2RL8
C6
g. h. i. j. k l.RL1 RL3 RL4 RL5 RL6 RL10
This yields the following key to the consolidated priorities:
a=Information Service;
b=Information Use;
c=Information Planning;
d=Economics of Information;
e=Professional Issues;
f=Intellectual freedom;
g=Policy Issues;
h=Information Access;
i=Archives;
j=Organizing Materials;
k=Public Services;
l=Library Models
4
By documenting and categorizing a substantial number of Federally and privately fundedprojects and both published and unpublished related research, this report is intended toprovide a framework for identifying trends or gaps in funded research that may be ofconcern to the field and to funders. It may also throw light on the policy question ofwhether the establishment of research priorities as attempted in the 1980s report is anadequate mechanism for shaping the nation’s library research agenda.
This paper also describes the major public and private funding source sponsors for libraryand information science research; the primary recipients of such funding; and askswhether funded projects have met expectations concerning research priorities incontributing to the needs of this field. Finally, it recommends how the library professionand funding entities, including the federal government, philanthropic organizations,academic institutions and related organizations, might more successfully approach thedevelopment of a national agenda for library research. We believe that this informationwill be useful for developing strategies and programs for improving research in libraryand information science and for assisting Federal policy-makers in planning for Federalfunding of library research.
5
Key Findings -- Priorities
Federally-funded library research projects between 1983 and 1997, library researchprojects funded by non-Federal organizations, and other “professionally rigorous”published studies for the period were tabulated and assigned to appropriate priorities fromthe 1980s reports. (See the chapter on Research Methodology on page 15 for furtherinformation). In most cases projects and studies were credited under more than onepriority. The tabulation given in Matrices A and B (pages 61 and 66) yields thefollowing distribution of studies by priority:
Table III: Distribution of Research by Priority
Priority A B C D E F G H I J K LFederal 21% 12% 8% 4% 6% 0% 8% 14% 1% 4% 21% 2%Non-Federal 25% 17% 4% 3% 3% 0% 4% 19% 1% 5% 17% 1%Studies 15% 11% 12% 3% 15% 3% 5% 5% 10% 1% 18% 0%
Figure 1
Library Research Priorities: 1983 - 1997
Priorities
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
a b c d e f g h i j k l
Published Studies
Non-Federal
Federal
6
The table above, and even more clearly, the graph, demonstrates that:
• Some of the 1980s priorities were frequently met by the research studies;others were less frequently met. There were no indications that the priorities,as a group, affected the direction of research.
On the other hand,
• A comparison of “priorities” met by the surveyed library research shows aremarkable coincidence in the percentage of projects groupable under specificpriorities between those projects funded by the Federal government and thoseprivately funded, while there are quite different distributions for publishedresearch.
From this we can logically conclude first, that either non-Federal funding sourcesfollowed the lead of Federal funding agencies in the distribution of library researchsupport across priorities, or, as is more likely, that neither the Federal funding agenciesnor the non-Federal funders appropriated support for library research in accordance withthe 1980s priorities. The most reasonable explanation for the coincidence in Federal andnon-Federal funding patterns is that both are attributable to a common factor other thanthe 1980s priorities and that the factor in question is simply the dynamic of research inthe field as perceived and supported by recognized researcher “leaders.”
Funded research takes place in a complex arena of individual and institutional priorities,the sociology of research communities, and the dynamics of the formation of requests forproposals process, responses to those requests, and their evaluations. In the absence ofexternal factors, those researchers most likely to be funded are among those most likelyto participate in funding decisions -- unless, of course, their own proposals are underconsideration -- formally, as participants in peer-review panels, or informally, as advisorsto program officers. This self-reinforcing cycle is central to the operation of whatThomas Kuhn called “normal science,” and operates with respect to publication, citation,conference participation, tenure decisions, etc., as well as with respect to fundingdecisions.
If policymakers wish to establish priorities for research, priorities that may differ fromthose of the field, if only by establishing an order of importance among various choices,the identification of those priorities is not in itself sufficient. They must be stronglyincorporated into the language of requests for proposals and into the guidelines for theproposal review process.
One mechanism frequently used to effect a national research agenda is the establishmentof research centers with distinct research plans. The national centers of the U. S.Department of Education are good examples of this strategy. There is presently nonational center for library research, which may account, in part, for the unfocused natureof library research in respect to the 1980s research priorities.
7
Key Findings -- Funding
Tables IVA and IVB show per project funding for library research by source. Theinformation in Table IVA, Federally-funded projects, yields the following key finding:
• Total Federal funding for library research since 1983 has been approximatelythree and a quarter million dollars. (See section below on the Digital LibraryInitiative for a qualification of this statement.) In other words, total Federalsupport for library research has averaged less than $275,000 per year.
Federal funding for library research peaked in 1987. Annual Federal funding for theentire period to all library research projects has been approximately one-quarter of thetypical annual funding of OERI national centers of research in other topics.
The information in Table IVB, projects funded from non-Federal sources, yields thefollowing key finding:
• Total non-Federal funding for library research since 1983 has been under $6million ($5,593,797), or approximately $430,000 per year.
Taking the information compiled in Tables IVA and IVB together,
• Total funding for library research, Federal and private, has averaged less thanthree-quarters of a million dollars per year since 1983.
A special subset of funded library research projects is made up of the Federal DigitalLibrary Initiative (not included in the analysis above), three Mellon Foundation-fundedprojects in 1993-94 and one Kellogg Foundation-funded project in 1995. The MellonFoundation projects were a baseline study (Princeton University, 1993, $210,000), anevaluation development project (Columbia University, 1994, $700,000), and anassessment of economic factors (Princeton University, 1994, $290,000), all concerningthe electronic or digital library of the future. The Kellogg Foundation project was forinstitutional and policy issues, also in relationship to the development of a digital library,part of the Foundation’s HRISM project (Harvard University, 1995, $650,000). In otherwords, this highly significant injection of funds for library research from two of thenation’s largest foundations has all been, in effect, for the same project, or, at least, thesame “priority,” reinforcing the even larger investments by non-traditional Federalsources in the same area.
8
• As funding for library research from traditional sources, such as the U.S. Departmentof Education, and in traditional areas involving physical collections, their use andaccess, has declined, funding for library research from other Federal agencies,including the Department of Defense, and from two large private foundations, hassharply increased in the specific research area of digital or electronic library planning-- which was not included among the priorities of the 1980s studies.
Figure 2
Library Research: Federaland Non-Federal
Funding
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
Non-Federal
Federal
9
Conclusions
• There was significant overlap among the priorities identified by the two 1980sstudies.
• Research activity was not evenly spread among the priorities, some receiving little, ifany, attention.
• Funding patterns, whether from private or public sources, do not reflect the prioritiesidentified in the two base studies to which the report refers.
• Federal and non-Federal funding patterns are quite similar.
• A substantial portion of library research resides in the academic sector, widelydistributed in terms of numbers of projects, very narrowly distributed in terms offunding.
• The funding picture has changed radically in the last few years, traditional sourcesdeclining, others taking their place, and the emphasis shifting to electronic libraryissues.
10
Recommendations
The unfocused nature of library research in the period 1983-1997, the decline in researchsupport from traditional sources, the relatively low level of federal support in relation toother research areas advanced through National Research Centers, and recent shifts inresearch support towards electronic library issues, all suggest the need for a coordinatednational agenda for library research. It is recommended that the U.S. Department ofEducation:
• Develop a national library research policy and capacity.
• Develop a Federal -- interdepartmental -- library research policy.
• Develop a National Center for Library Research, modeled after other U.S.Department of Education research centers, to provide national and Federal leadershipin library research. The National Center for Library Research should be closelylinked to both the National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, andLifelong Learning and the National Library of Education with strong liaisonrelationships with the National Science Foundation and other Federal funders oflibrary research, such as the Institute for Museum and Library Services, the NationalEndowment for the Humanities, and the United States Commission on Libraries andInformation Science.
Preliminary objectives for the National Center for Library Research might include:
1. To strengthen nationally the library-based information infrastructure and deliverysystem.
2. To inform investment in library development.
As the nation makes substantial investments in library services and libraryredevelopment -- through such programs as NSF’s Digital Library Initiative, theLibrary of Congress’ National Digital Library, the Commerce Department’s TIAAPgrants, the Institute of Museum and Library Services and the National Libraries ofEducation, Agriculture and the Environment -- it is especially important to recognizelibraries as a national resource and to build a research program that can help informpublic and private investment. Without such a program library development andredevelopment is chaotic, haphazard and non-strategic.
3. To develop a national perspective on connectivity among types and sizes of libraries.
A truly national library research program must embrace all types and sizes oflibraries, for today the size, location, or institutional affiliation of a library is less
11
important than its connections to other institutions and information sources. Aslibraries are increasingly linked through new technologies, they are increasingly onevast institution offering seamless access to the world’s information resources as wellas local information and documentation.
Other objectives for the proposed National Center for Libraries will arise from theplanned discussions leading to its establishment. This report will support thosediscussions through its documentation of nearly fifteen years of library research, itsrelationship to earlier priorities, its funding support, principal investigators, andinstitutional base.
In the early 1980’s public libraries were thought of in much the same way as they hadbeen thought of a hundred years before. They were buildings in which collections wereheld and made accessible to the public. As libraries are public institutions, and as thosebuildings are frequently large and centrally located, libraries were also seen as providingpublic space for library-related, and unrelated, public activities, chief among, cultural andliteracy classes and exhibitions. It was probably not widely foreseen at the time that inthe mid-1990s major research universities would be receiving millions of dollars forlibrary research, not about any of these issues, but in reference to the novel concept of anelectronic or digital library, and that much, if not most, of this funding would come fromFederal sources not traditionally associated with library research.
The effort to establish national priorities for library research that took place within theDepartment of Education in the 1980s was not only overtaken by events, it was alsochallenged by the way in which library research is funded and by the absence of a strongpolicy initiative congruent with those priorities that were developed. Certainly, all thelibrary research that is tabulated in this report can be attributed to one or more of the1980s priorities. On the other hand, the distribution seems to indicate that the motivationfor the research studies did not arise from the priorities, and, especially, the congruencebetween the distributions among the priorities of Federally funded and non-Federallyfunded research indicates that the field was not influenced by a strong perception ofFederal policy in this area. The sudden support for digital library projects from Federalsources outside the Department of Education and from two key foundations is alsosignificant in reference to Department of Education policy leadership in this area.
The nature and future of libraries and their role in the nation’s information infrastructureis an increasingly important national issue in the context of the emerging globalinformation economy. To use and develop that infrastructure to support economicdevelopment, education, cultural development, and civic involvement we mustunderstand its relevant problems, trends and opportunities; innovative programs andinstitutions, and best practices in terms of library services today. The future of Americanlibraries will include electronic, digital, collections and services. It will also includebooks, objects, visual materials, the functions of library buildings as focal points forresearch, lifelong learning and access to the digital collections currently under
12
development. It will include -- need it be said? -- librarians, their training, both pre-service and in-service, and it will include the public itself.
All of these are important research priorities.
There is today, even more than there was in the early 1980s, an urgent need for a nationallibrary research agenda to support the development of all facets of our libraries. Anappropriate mechanism for developing and -- crucially -- supporting that agenda is readyat hand in the national research center process of OERI. Just as there are national centersin many other fields -- for example, adult literacy -- so there should be a National Centerfor Library Research. This Center, like other OERI centers, would:
• Conduct a coherent, sustained program of research and development to addressproblems and issues of national significance, using a well-conceptualized andtheoretically sound framework;
• Contribute to the development and advancement of theory;
• Conduct scientifically rigorous studies capable of generating findings that contributesubstantially to understanding in the field;
• Conduct work of sufficient size, scope, and duration to produce definitive guidancefor improvement efforts and further research;
• Address issues of both equity and excellence in education for all students, and
• Document, report and disseminate information about research findings and otheraccomplishments in ways that will facilitate effective use of that information inprofessional development for teachers, families, and communities members, asappropriate.1
The request for proposals process for initiating this center will include the identificationof a national research agenda for library research; the funding of the center subsequentlydesignated would be tied to work on that agenda. Funded at levels parallel with otherOERI centers (approximately $1.5 million annually), the National Center for LibraryResearch would have at its disposal historically significant support for the nationalresearch agenda. It would also be encouraged to seek other Federal and non-Federalfunding to extend its research capacity and to help coordinate public and private researchon libraries and information science. In this way the goals of the 1980s initiatives of theDepartment of Education would be fulfilled.
1 OERI. Where Are We Going With Educational Research? 1996, p. 5.
13
The Digital Library Initiative
The Digital Library Initiative began in 1994, when three federal agencies -- the DefenseAdvanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration (NASA), and the National Science Foundation (NSF) -- collaborativelyawarded six contracts, totaling $24.6 million, to six university-based groups. Thecontracts have a duration of four years, and each university is required to providematching support that approximately doubles the total budget of the effort.
According to the NSF webpage, the goal of the Digital Library Initiative is to “advancethe means to collect, store, and organize information in digital forms, and make itavailable for searching, retrieval, and processing via communication networks -- all inuser-friendly ways.” The initiative emphasizes the need for partnerships that includeresearchers, developers, and users. Many of the six universities that are sites of theDigital Library Initiative have established working relationships with commercial firmssuch as Xerox and Microsoft, and with large institutions such as the Library of Congressand the New York Public Library.
In 1998 the three federal agencies opened competition for Phase II of the Initiative.
The Digital Library Initiative will doubtless shape the future of information research andaccess, yet we have excluded it from our analysis for two reasons:
1. The level of funding so far exceeds that for all other library research that it cannot beincluded in the analysis without distorting the results.
2. Most of the work is being done by researchers in computer science and informationscience, with comparatively little input from traditional library researchers.
Nevertheless, the following information is provided as a matter of interest. Each siteconcentrates on a different aspect of the total project.
1. Carnegie-Mellon University. Grant $4.8 millionCarnegie-Mellon University and WQED/Pittsburgh are creating the Informediainteractive on-line digital video library system, which will enable users to access,explore, and retrieve science and mathematics materials from video archives. The systemintegrates speech, image, and natural language understanding technologies. Researchwill also address issues involving human-computer interaction, pricing and charging fordigital video use, and privacy and security.
2. Stanford University. Grant $3.6 millionThe Stanford Digital Library project focuses on inter-operability. It is developing theenabling technologies for an integrated virtual library that will provide uniform access tonetworked information. The project also includes research about how to pay for
14
information and resources over the network, and it is collecting information about legalissues, especially the fair use of intellectual property.
3. University of California at Berkeley. Grant $4 millionThe Berkeley Digital Library focuses on environmental information. The goal is to“develop the technologies for intelligent access to massive, distributed collections ofphotographs, satellite images, maps, full text documents, and ‘multivalent’ documents.”Personnel include faculty, staff, and students in the Computing Science Division, theSchool of Information Management & Systems, and the Research Program inEnvironmental Planning & Geographic Information Systems.
4. University of California at Santa Barbara. Grant $4 millionProject Alexandria is developing a digital library that will offer access to collections ofmaps, images, and pictorial materials as well as new electronic library services. Theproject has begun with collections of digitized maps, images, and airphotos relating toSanta Barbara, Ventura, and Los Angeles counties, and will grow to include componentsat other academic sites as well as federal agencies and public institutions including publiclibraries.
5. University of Illinois. Grant $4 millionBased at the Grainger Engineering Library Information Center, this project focuses onjournals and magazines n the engineering science literature. The Graduate School ofLibrary and Information Science is conducting the research, which includes asociological evaluation of the testbed, “technological development of semantic retrieval,”and the design of “scalable information systems (the Interspace).”
6. University of Michigan. Grant $4 millionThe project is developing the testbed of a multimedia digital library focused on earth andspace sciences. The prototype system will be tested and evaluated by a wide variety ofusers, including college and high-school teachers and students and the users of publiclibraries.
15
Research Methodology
1. Scope of work
LFF conducted this study, during August through November 1997, under a contract withthe Department of Education that defined the issues to be considered, the types of dataneeded, and the nature of the final product. Researchers were asked to identify “themajor federal and non-federal funding sponsors for library and information scienceresearch from 1983 through June 1997, “ as well as “dissertations, meta-analyses,conference papers, journal articles, etc. that describe additional (not institutionallyfunded) research efforts in library and information science.” They were asked to supply,where possible, names of sponsoring institutions, nature of research done, funding level,and names of principal investigators and their institutional affiliations. The basic chargewas to conduct research and perform analysis that would help identify an estimate of thenature and dollar amount of funded research and provide a reliable estimate of the extentto which library research needs identified in the last decade have been met and the extentto which further research priorities should be pursued.
1.a. Timespan of research examined
The Letter of Agreement that governed conduct of this project specified that wepay special attention to assessing the degree to which explicit federal prioritiesestablished during the 1980s and early 1990s were reflected in LIS researchduring the period 1983 through June 1997. The priorities had been set forth intwo studies, A Library and Information Science Research Agenda for the 1980s(the Cuadra Report), published in 1982, and Issues in Library Research: AnAgenda for the 1990s. A major goal of this project was to estimate the degree towhich publication of the Cuadra Report and Issues in Library Research hadinfluenced library and information science research.
1.b. Funded and unfunded research
The Letter of Agreement also required that LFF assess the nature of research thatwas not supported with grants or other outside funding. Therefore, our studymade a fundamental distinction between "institutionally funded" and "notinstitutionally funded" projects.
1.c. Definition of the field
The Letter of Agreement broadly described the subject matter to be examined --the large and diverse field of library and information science -- but qualified itwith a proviso that the search for data should locate "particularly those [projects]relating to education, such as (but not limited to) community-based education,informal learning and access to information." Our understanding of this proviso
16
placed the focus of our work on the institution that historically has been mostclosely associated with "community-based education, informal learning andaccess to information" -- the public library. This interpretation was accepted byOERI and became a fundamental boundary to our work. We therefore designed aresearch plan that took the public library as a beginning point and central focusbut reached out to include large samples of research in related subjects, such ascomputerization, electronic connectivity, catalogue design and testing, and soforth.
The goal of the research was not to locate every LIS project but rather, followingthe charge noted above, to identify projects sponsored by major funders ofresearch and to find unfunded projects that represented "rigorous" research. Weunderstood this charge to require collection of enough examples to provide anestimate of the nature and dollar amount of funded research and a reliable cross-section of unfunded research.
1.d. Interpretation of key phrases
The Letter of Agreement used two terms that required interpretation before theycould be applied in the analysis: (i) "major funders" and (ii) "research."
(i) Major funders.We left the definition in abeyance until we had conducted enoughsearching to gain a sense of what counted as large or important funding inthe LIS universe. We concluded that "major" funder meant any entity thathad contributed at least $50,000, to LIS research during the period 1983-97. As our research proceeded, we decided to include lesser funders also,to giver a broader context for assessing the contributions of all funders toLIS. In absolute dollar amounts these lesser funders contributed a smallfraction of the amount of the major funders -- not enough to materiallyalter the annual dollar totals -- yet they supported many intellectuallyrigorous projects that merit consideration as part of the national researchendeavor in LIS.
(ii) Research.We began our work with an informal definition of research as anintellectual endeavor that has the following characteristics:
• It poses a clear question or issue• It addresses the question or issue systematically• It documents its data and other sources
The Letter of Agreement added specificity to our initial workingdefinition. It asked us to consider "basic and applied research, hypothesis-testing, surveys, assessments, evaluations, investigations, experiments, and
17
demonstrations" (the list of categories was taken from OERI's guidelinesfor field-initiated fundable research). We refined the definition through anexamination of those projects that OERI had verbally identified to us asconstituting the core of federally funded research in the field of library andinformation science, as the field was interpreted in the Letter ofAgreement. This examination of projects funded under the HigherEducation Act, Titles IIB, C, and D, gave us a sense of how OERI wantedus to understand "research."
2. Search strategy
The Letter of Agreement required that we consider for inclusion reports and publicationsfrom projects funded by the federal government, state and local government, privatefoundations, businesses, and nonprofit organizations. It also included a list of categoriesof materials, such as "dissertations, meta-analyses, conference papers, journals articles,etc. that describe additional (not institutionally funded) research efforts in library andinformation science." It further asked us to identify projects by name or title and date,"as well as and where possible to supply names of sponsoring institutions, nature ofresearch done, funding level, and names of principal investigators and their institutionalaffiliations."
Our search had two parts: first, identify projects and publications that seemed candidatesfor inclusion, and second, find abstracts or full texts that contained information aboutitems such as institutional affiliations that were unavailable in bibliographies and otherfinding aids.
2.a. DatabasesFollowing the lead of the Letter of Agreement, which required that we consultimportant databases, such as those of NSF and the Foundation Center, wetargeted five major finding aids:
i. ERIC: the Department of Education’s on-line database, mainly forfederally supported projects and education-oriented projects.ii. Library Literature: a standard finding aid that covers all aspects of LISiii. Dissertation Abstracts: for Ph.D.s and MLS thesesiv. National Science Foundation: for high-tech projectsv. Foundation Center's FC Search: a beginning point for foundation grants
2.b. Other sources
We augmented these searches with targeted searches in the catalogues of theLibrary of Congress and the New York Public Library. We also searched thewebsites of selected organizations, including:
18
• American Library Association (ALA)• Association of Research Libraries (ARL)• Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR; formerly CLR)• U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science
(NCLIS)• On-line Computer Library Center (OCLC)• Public Library Association (PLA)• Urban Libraries Council (ULC)
We solicited additional information directly from agencies, organizations, andfoundations.
To identify projects or sponsors that may have eluded the database search, we dida cross-cutting search by examining selected serial publications, including officialreports of major funding entities.
Official documents examined as part of the cross-cutting search included:
• CLIR annual reports, 1984-86, 1989-1996• OCLC research reports, 1985-86 through 1997• OERI abstracts of funded projects for HEA Title IIB, 1983-92• OERI abstracts of funded projects for HEA Title IIC, 1983-91• OERI abstracts of funded projects for HEA Title IID, 1983-89
Among the journals examined in hard copy or microfilm were:
• American Libraries 1991-97• Drexel Library Quarterly 1983-85• Journal of Library Administration 1983-88, 1996• Library and Information Science Research 1984, 1986-97• Library Journal 1994-97• Public Libraries 1987-95• Public Library Quarterly 1984-86• Reference Librarian 1988, 1990• RQ 1983-96
3. Placing data into the tables
As we acquired abstracts or complete copies of items that warranted inclusion in TablesIV or V, we began sorting them by category -- funded, unfunded. We assumed that if apublication carried no mention of a funder, it represented "unfunded" research.
19
3.a. The Tables
Tables IVA and B, in the words of the Letter of Agreement, identify "the majorfederal and non-federal funding sponsors for library and information scienceresearch from 1983 through June 1997." For each project the tables have thefollowing categories:
a. Sponsor (the funding entity)b. Program (the year that the project was funded)c. Focus (the subject of the research)d. Type (methodology or general approach; e.g. statistical analysis, casestudy)e. Funding (dollar amount)f. Researcher (principal investigator(s) with affiliation(s)g. Institution (affiliation of the P.I.; usually also the fiscal agent)
Tables VA and B identify "additional (not institutionally funded)" researchefforts, and for each project have the following categories:
a. Researcher (name and date of publication)b. Institution (affiliation of author)c. Project (title of article, dissertation, or other item)d. Focus (subject area)e. Type (methodology or general approach, e.g. statistical analysis, casestudy)
. Table VA, research published in periodicals, is a cross-section, not acomprehensive listing. The annual production of LIS research articles --amounting to perhaps several hundred a year -- is too large for detailedexamination of the sort required by the project. However, it is likely that thisselection, based on a variety of search techniques applied to an array ofperiodicals, captures a good sense of basic trends.
Table VB is based on a search of the Dissertation Abstracts database; it is acomprehensive listing of theses and dissertations in LIS that relate to publiclibraries
Each project bears a date. For funded projects the date is usually the project'sbeginning date; for dissertations it is the date of acceptance by the university; forperiodical literature is the date of publication. Funding for multi-year projectswas attributed to the beginning year.
20
3.b. Closing gaps
As we began placing items in the tables we identified gaps in information, mostcommonly the level of funding. When we could not locate information from theannual reports or grants databases of foundations and federal agencies or fromwebpages, we made phone calls, to approximately 40 foundations, other funders,and principal investigators.
Despite our efforts, the funding data are incomplete. In some cases we simplycould not locate anyone who had the information we needed; in others the funderswere unable to provide an estimate of support for projects done in-house. Inaddition, we did not have the time to assess the contribution of the LibraryServices and Construction Act (LSCA), for decades the largest federal programfor public libraries. Upon advice from staff at OERI, we decided that it was nottime- or cost-effective to sift through the hundreds of state reports that constitutethe documentation of LSCA projects, especially considering that LSCA, aimedlargely at construction, implementation, and staff support, did not constitute amajor funding source for LIS research.
3.c. Removing redundancies
If we found that a given research effort was represented by more than one citation-- such as a dissertation that was also the basis for a monograph or article, or afunded project that provided the research for a journal article -- we selected onlyone citation to represent the research in the tables. We chose the fundedmanifestation of a given project over its unfunded manifestation; thus an OERI-funded project described in an annual report by the Department of Education andalso represented by a journal article or monograph appears only once, in Table IV(funded projects).
4. Special assistance from sponsors/funders/libraries
At the request of LFF, Thomas C. Phelps, director of the Division of Public Programs,National Endowment for the Humanities, arranged for a search of NEH's in-housedatabase of grant awards. Suzanne Krouse provided general information on funding ofprojects by OCLC and back issues of annual reports that would have been otherwisedifficult to obtain. Richard Ekman, secretary of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation,discussed project priorities and funding and sent back issues of the foundation's annualreports. James Humphrey, president of the H. W. Wilson Foundation, and his secretarysearched files for funding information about projects, some dating to the mid 1980s.
Leigh Estabrook, Dean of the Graduate School of Library and Information Science,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, provided information about projects at theCenter on Public Library Research. Staff at the National Library of Education helped
21
locate annual reports for projects funded by Title II of the Higher Education Act. Thefiles of Libraries for the Future yielded several significant items.
22
The Data
We have looked at four categories of research:
Federally-funded research (Table IVA);
Privately funded research (Table IVB);
Research not funded from any obvious federal or private source but published(Table VA); and
Other research not fitting the above categories but available as dissertations,conference papers and the like (Table VB).
23
Table IVA: Federally funded library research(Listed in chronological order)
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OERI HEAII-B1983
Roles of school, academic,special, and communitylibraries in providingviewtext informationservices
assess-ment
60,000 MaryDeweaver
LawrenceJohnson &Assocs, Inc.
OERI HEAII-B1983
Determine impact of TitleII-B fellowships on thelibrary and informationscience profession
assess-ment
20,000 Mildred Lowe St. John’sUniversity
OERI LSCA1983-84
Public libraryeffectiveness: theory,measures, and determinants
assess-ment
Nancy A. VanHouse
MarylandState Library
OERI HEAII-B1985
Cooperative system forpublic library datacollection, to provide datafor NCES
pilotpro-gram
54,423 Mary JoLynch
ALA
OERI HEAII-B1985
Status of libraries inliteracy education
survey 148,037 DouglasZweizig et al.
UniversityofWisconsinMadison
OERI HEAII-B1986
Update of, and comparisonwith, a 1971 survey oflibrary services to the aging
Survey 22,674 Betty J.Turock
RutgersUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1986
Identifying researchableissues to help librariansattain or maintainleadership positions in aninformation society
Assess-ment
348,966 Kate Joyceand MaryKahn
WashingtonConsultingGroup
OERI LSCA1986
Relationship betweenlength of loan period andcirculation in publiclibraries
Survey >25,000 Susan Nelsonand HerbertGoldhor
Illinois StateLibrary
OERI HEAII-B1987
Cognitive models tofacilitate informationseeking
Devel-opment& testmodel
94,703 CarolKuhlthau
RutgersUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1987
Evaluation of adult libraryliteracy programs
Devel-opment& testmanual
52,969 DouglasZweizig
UniversityofWisconsin
OERI HEAII-B1987
The Public LibraryEffectiveness Study
Survey 132,000 ThomasChilders andNancy VanHouse
DrexelUniversity
Federally funded library research
24
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OERI HEAII-B1987 or1988
Institute to review trends inkey subjects related tourban libraries [grantmentioned in monograph]
Confer-ence
MohammedAman andDonald Sager
UniversityofWisconsinMilwaukee
OERI HEAII-B1988
Assessing the informationneeds of rural Americans
Surveyandtrain-ingmater-ials
59,443 BernardVavrek
ClarionUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1988
Nature and improvement oflibrarian-user interactionand on-line searching forinformation delivery inlibraries
modeldevel-opmentandsearchanalysis
84,823 TefkoSaracevic
RutgersUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1988
A study of thedissemination of the PublicLibrary Planning Process
assess-ment
57,143 Verna L.Pungitore
IndianaUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1988
Medical literature as asource of new knowledge
citationandcontentanalysis
41,248 Ron R.Swanson
Universityof Chicago
OERI HEAII-B1988
Facilitating informationseeking through cognitivemodeling of the searchprocess
surveys 93,553 CarolKuhlthau
RutgersUniversity
OERI HEAII-D1988
Develop comparativeresearch data on twolibrary instruction methodsfor undergraduateengineering students
assess-ment
84,545 FrancesBenham,AssociateDean ofLibraries
Universityof Alabama
OERI HEAII-D1988
Evaluating use of newtechnology
assess-ment
101,622 Jack O’Bar,UniversityLibrary
Universityof Alaska
OERI HEAII-D1988
Research to measureeffects of a three-collegeautomation project onusers, staff, and institutions
assess-ment
102,643 Thomas A.Childers andBelver C.Griffith
DrexelUniversity
OERI HEAII-D1988
Purchase of hardware andresearch and demonstrationof technical requirementsfor a consortium
demon-strationproject
89,438 Patricia M.Kelly,UniversityLibrary
GeorgeWashingtonUniversity
OERI HEAII-D1988
Program to teach and guidestudents in using on-linepublic catalog andcomputerized and printreference sources
proto-typedevel-opment
117,558 Virginia Tiefel Ohio StateUniversityLibraries
Federally funded library research
25
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OERI HEAII-D1988
Providing principles,guidelines, and desirablefeatures for a 3rd-generation on-line publicaccess catalog
casestudy
106,987 NicholasBelkin andTefkoSaracevic
RutgersUniversity
OERI HEAII-D1988
Evaluate use of fax copiersor scanners in lieu ofsending actual items orphotocopies
con-trolledtests
175,746 Robert J.Bertholf
SUNYBuffalo
OERI HEAII-B1989
Developing a prototypesystem for intelligentinformation retrieval
devel-opmentandfieldtest
63,500 Philip J. Smithand RebeccaDarling
Ohio StateUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1989
Hypermedia and researchmethodology
Soft-waredevel-opmentanduserobser-vation
55,500 EleanorLangstaff
BaruchCollege,CUNY
OERI HEAII-B1989
Age analysis of publiclibrary collections
sampl-ing andcompar-isons
78,375 DannyWallace
LSU
OERI HEAII-B1989
Local implementation ofthe public library planningand role setting process
fieldstudies
57,187 VernaPungitore
IndianaUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1989
Output measures forchildren’s services inpublic libraries
devel-opmentandfieldtest
42,014 VirginiaWalter
ALA
OERI HEAII-B1989
Assessing the role of therural public library
surveyandtrainingmanual
58,389 BernardVavrek
ClarionUniversity
OERI HEAII-D1989
To determine if hands-onexercises improve ability touse computer-basedresearch tools
assess-ment
85,677 MarvinWiggins
BrighamYoungUniversity
OERI HEAII-D1989
Benefit to rural-areastudents and faculty ofregional informationnetworks
demon-strationproject
38,128 Patricia J.Cutright
EasternOregon StateCollege
Federally funded library research
26
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OERI HEAII-D1989
Development of an"electronic textbook" inhuman physiology
systemdevel-opment
200,287 Naomi C.Broering,BiomedicalInformationResourcesCenter
George-townUniversity
OERI HEAII-D1989
Development and study ofan intelligent referenceinformation system (ISIS)
systemdevel-opment
99,852 Robin N.Downes,UniversityLibrary
Universityof Houston
OERI HEAII-D1989
Pilot computer-basedtraining modules for stafftraining libraries
demo.project
66,901 Pauline S.Bayne, MusicLibrary
Universityof TennesseeKnoxville
OERI HEAII-B1989
Factors influencing theoutcome of challenges tomaterials in middle, junior,and high school libraries
casestudy
65,750 DianeHopkins
UniversityofWisconsin
OERI HEAII-B1989
Economics of publiclibraries and libraryfunding
survey;casestudy
57,100 Jane B.Robbins,DouglasZweizig
UrbanLibrariesCouncil
OERI HEAII-B1990
The impact of schoollibrary media centers onacademic achievement
dataanalysis
66,664 Keith CurryLance
State Libraryand AdultEducationOffice,ColoradoDepartmentof Education
OERI LSCATitle III1990
Book deterioration in Ohiolibraries
Assess-ment
Edward T.O’Neill &Wesley L.Boomgaarden
OCLC &Ohio StateLibrary
OERI LSCATitle I1991
Hypermedia project toprovide information in fourcounty library systems
Demon-strationproject
80,000 New JerseyState Library
OERI HEAII-B1991
Public library planningprocess in smaller libraries.
casestudy
45,700 VernaPungitore andCaroleNowicke
IndianaUniversity
OERI HEAII-B1991
Assessment of the publiclibrary’s mission in society
surveyandanalysis
108,354 George D’Elia UniversityofMinnesota
OERI HEAII-B1991
The use of children’smaterials in school andpublic libraries
surveyandanalysis
57,833 KathleenGarland
SUNYBuffalo
OERI HEAII-B1991
Embracing the tiger:learning from public libraryliteracy programs
casestudy
62,949 Andrew J.Seager
RMCResearch
Federally funded library research
27
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OERI HEAII-B1991
Assessing information onthe Internet: libraryservices for computer-mediated communication
site andcontentanalysis
48,675 Martin Dillon OCLC
OERI HEAII-D1991
Testing a new design forsubject access to on-linecatalogues
fieldtest
KarenDrabenstott
Universityof Michigan
OERI LSCATitle I1991
Hypermedia project toprovide information in 4county library systems
demon-strationprojects
80,000 CamdenCounty,NeptunePublic,SouthBruns-wick,andSomersetCountyBridgewaterBranchlibraries
U.S.Congress
1993 Adult literacy and newtechnologies: tools for alifetime.
assess-ment
Office ofTechnologyAssessment
NCLIS 1994 Public libraries and theInternet: study results,policy issues, andrecommendations.
baseline study
67,759 Charles R.McClure, JohnCarlo Bertot &Douglas L.Zweizig
NEH PublicPrograms1994
Research anddemonstration to produce asubstantial body ofinformation about theorganizational, financial,and technical issuesinvolved in applying digitalimagery in the preservationarena.
demon-strationproject
363,491 Paul L.Conway
YaleUniversity
NCLIS &NSF
1995 Internet costs and costmodels for public libraries;publication.
baseline study
112,529 Charles R.McClure, JohnCarlo Bertot &John C.Beachboard
SyracuseUniversity
NCLIS 1996 Public Libraries and theInternet
Nation-alSurvey
76,965 John CarloBertot, et al
SyracuseUniversity
NCLIS 1997 Public Libraries and theInternet
Update 10,000 Charles R.McClure, JohnCarlo Bertot &John C.Beachboard
SyracuseUniversity
28
Table IVB: Privately funded library research(Listed in chronological order)
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
Old GoldSummerFellow-ship, Uni-versityIowa
1983 Naive vs sophisticatedmethods of forecastingpublic library circulations
casestudy
Terrence A.Brooks
University ofIowa, IowaCity
H.W.WilsonFndtn.
1983 The national libraryreference survey
surveyandanalysis
25,000 John W. Head ClarionUniversity
CLR 1983 Online catalog evaluationproject
dataanalysis
32,403 Ray R. Larson University ofCalifornia,Berkeley
CLR 1983 Relationship betweenbibliographic access tostored materials and facultyattitude and use
casestudy
31,747 University ofMichigan,Ann Arbor
FairfaxCountyPublicLibrary
1984 Comparative assessment ofpatrons’ uses andevaluations across publiclibraries within a system: areplication
surveysandanalysis
George D’Eliaand Elanor JoRodger
University ofMinnesota &PLA
CLR 1984 Dewey DecimalClassification as an on-linesearching tool for subjectaccess
assess-ment
94,350 Forest Press,Albany, NY
CLR 1984 Measuring public servicesimpact of an on-linecatalog
assess-ment
19,200 Louise S.Sherby
ColumbiaUniversity
CLR 1984 User success with an on-line catalog
casestudy
15,736 Nancy C.Kranich, et al
NYU
CLR 1984 Costs of consortiummembership
assess-ment
23,500 Tantalus, Inc.
UniversityofMichigan
1984 Childhood Socialization:Its Effect on Adult LibraryUse and Adult Reading
surveyandanalysis
5,000 Ronald R.Powell,Margaret T.Taylor, DavidL. McMillen
University ofMichigan
St. Law-rence Uni-versityLibrary
1985 Union-nonunion wagedifferentials in the publiclibrary
econo-micanalysis
500 Mary F.Rosenthal
Duluth PublicLibrary
BentonFndtn.
1985 Support of ACLU’s workon privacy implications ofnew computer andcommunicationtechnologies
explora-torystudy
25,000 ACLU
Privately funded library research
29
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
BentonFndtn.
1985 Telecommunication needsof nonprofits in the TwinCities area; resourcedirectory; seminars on newtechnologies
surveyandassess-ment
15,000 Spring HillCenter,Wayzata, MN
RutgersUniversityResearchCouncil
1985 Organization factors inmultitype librarynetworking: a national testof a model
fieldtest
Betty J.Turock
RutgersUniversity
UniversityWiscon-sin, Osh-kosh
1985 Development andevaluation of a measure oflibrary automation
devel-opmentandtesting
2,000 Verna L.Pungitore
IndianaUniversity
CLR 1985 Role of fees in supportinglibrary and informationservices
assess-ment
10,000 NationalCommissionon Librariesand Infor-mationScience
CLR 1985 Impact of transaction feeson interlibrary loan
assess-ment
2,960 James H.Sweetland &Darlene E.Weigand
StateHistoricalSociety ofWisconsin
CLR 1985 Time management inacademic libraries
assess-ment
2,773 University ofArizona,Tucson
CLR 1985 Impact of technologicalchanges on libraryfunctional units
casestudy
3,000 University ofIllinois,Chicago
CLR 1985 Knowledge Bases andLibrary Education
surveyandanalysis
2,100 Ronald R.Powell andSheila D.Creth
University ofMichigan
OCLC 1985-86 Advanced interface designfor library retrieval systems
designandprototype
NA Martin Dillon OCLC
OCLC 1985-86 Automated title pagecatalogiing
designandtesting
NA Stuart Weibel OCLC
OCLC 1985-86 Class dispersion betweenthe Library of Congressclassification and theDewey Decimalclassification
assessment
NA Diane Vizine-Goetz
OCLC
OCLC 1985-86 CONSER abstracting andindexing title overlap
assessment
NA John E. Tolle OCLC
Privately funded library research
30
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OCLC 1985-86 Display formats; to developexperimental methods forevaluating human-computer interfaces andrefine evaluationtechniques
design NA John E. Tolle OCLC
OCLC 1985-86 Graph-Text; to developprototype electronicdocument delivery system
designandfieldtesting
NA ThomasHickey
OCLC
OCLC 1985-86 Nonfiction book use bypublic library users
casestudy
NA ChandraPrabha
OCLC
OCLC 1985-86 OCLC CD-ROM retrievalsystem
designandfieldtest
NA Terry Noreault OCLC
OCLC 1985-86 OCLC database useanalysis: determination ofan appropriate databasesubset for cataloging on theOCLC M300 Workstation
assessment
NA Brigitte L.Kenney
OCLC
IndianaUniversitySchool ofLibraryand Infor-mationScience
1986 Perceptions of change andpublic library directors inIndiana: an exploratorystudy
surveyandanalysis
650 Verna L.Pungitore
IndianaUniversity
CLR 1986 Relationships betweenlibrary schools and theirinstitutions’ libraries
assess-ment
3,000 MarianneCooper &ShoshonaKaufmann
QueensCollege,CUNY
CLR 1986 The RLG conspectus as acollection management tool
assess-ment
10,000 ResearchLibrariesGroup, Inc.
CLR 1986 Information needs of publicaffairs scholars
assess-ment
2,996 SUNY Albany
CLR 1986 Coverage of library andinformation science inbibliographic databases
assess-ment
2,935 SUNYBuffalo
CLR 1986 Statistical reliability ofindicators in the RLGconspectus for music
assess-ment
3,000 SUNYBuffalo
CLR 1986 Long-range planning forlibraries and informationresources in researchuniversities
plan-ning
400,000 UCLA
CLR 1986 Effects of human factors ona library computer literacyprogram
casestudy
3,000 University ofMissouri,Columbia
Privately funded library research
31
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
CLR 1986 Roles of informationmanagers in U.S.universities
assess-ment
10,990 University ofPittsburgh
CLR 1986 Users’ interest in digitizedimages
casestudy
2,964 University ofTexas, Austin
CLR 1986 Effects of publishedreviews on librarypurchasing decisions
assess-ment
2,965 University ofWisconsin,Milwaukee
FordFndtn.
1986 Kinds of informationavailable on neighborhooddevelopment for use bycitizens and public officials
assess-ment
40,000 CUNY
OCLC 1986-87 Comparative classification;investigatesinterdisciplinary nature ofclassificatin theory andmethod
assessment
NA Francis L.Miksa
OCLC
OCLC 1986-87 Library of Congress ClassM subset: music; toidentify methods ofcorrecting records andcreate a prototype database
assessment anddesign
NA Jeanette M.Drone
OCLC
OCLC 1986-87 Online Union Catalogsubsetting analysis
assessment
NA John A. Bunge OCLC
OCLC 1986-87 Assessing access toalternative presspublications: women'spress titles in the OCLConline Union Catalog
assessment
NA SuzanneHildenbrand
SUNYBuffalo
OCLC 1986-87 Dynamics of the OCLConline Union Catalog
assessment
NA Debora Shaw Univ. Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
OCLC 1986-87 Holdings as a measure ofjournal value
assessment
NA Danny P.Wallace
LSU
OCLC 1986-87 Studies in automaticcataloging
surveyanalysis
NA ElaineSvenonius
UCLA
OCLC 1986-87 Variations in subjectcataloging in non-Libraryof Congress catalogingrecords
surveyanalysis
NA Lois Mai Chan Univ.Kentucky,Lexington
OCLC,CLR,Univ.Michigan
1986-87 Increasing the Accessibilityof Library of Congresssubject headings in onlinebibliographic systems
assessment
NA Karen Markeyet al.
OCLC &Univ.Michigan
CLR 1987 User persistence inscanning LCS postings
casestudy
1,200 Stephen E.Wiberley, Jr.,et al
University ofIllinois,Chicago
CLR 1987 User persistence inscanning LCS postings
casestudy
1200 Stephen E.Wiberley et al.
Univ. Illinois,Chicago
Privately funded library research
32
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OCLC 1987-88 Automated documentstructure analysis
design NA Stuart L.Weibel
OCLC
OCLC 1987-88 Clustering equivalentbibliographic records
assessment
NA ElaineSvevonius
OCLC
OCLC 1987-88 Collection analysis;examines monographicacquisitions of selectedARL members
assessment
NA Edward T.O'Neill
OCLC
OCLC 1987-88 Connectionist models ofcomputation: theirpotential in informationsystems
exploratorystudy
NA Stuart T.Weibel
OCLC
OCLC 1987-88 Duplicate detection and the"species problem"
assessment
NA John A. Bunge OCLC
OCLC 1987-88 Managing large retrievals exploratorystudy
NA Chandra G.Prabha
OCLC
OCLC 1987-88 Scholars cross-referencesystem; a way ofcollecting, enhancing, andusing bibliographicrelationships not manifestin text per se
exploratorystudy
NA Paul B. Kantor OCLC
UniversityWisconsinInstituteon RaceandEthnicity&UniversityWisconsinGraduateSchool
1988 Toward a conceptual modelof factors influencing theoutcome of challenges tolibrary materials in schoolsettings
litera-turesurveyandanalysis
DianneMcAfeeHopkins
University ofWisconsin,Madison
CLR 1988 Microcomputer-baseddigital imaging as atechnique for preservinglibrary materials
fieldtest
2,500 UCLA
CLR 1988 To study users of full-textdatabases
casestudy
2,988 Carol Tenopir,Diane Nahl-Jakobovits,Dara LeeHoward
University ofHawaii,Manoa
CLR 1988 Perceived values ofadvanced subject degrees
casestudy
3,000 Mary Grosch& TerryWeech
University ofIllinois,Urbana
CLR 1988 Information needs ofphilosophers
baseline study
34,625 Mary EllenSievert
University ofMissouri,Columbia
Privately funded library research
33
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
IllinoisStateLibrary
1988 Survey of children’slibrarians in Illinois publiclibraries
survey Lorienne Roy University ofTexasAustin
OCLC 1988 Analytical study ofbibliographic data on a titlepage
assessment
3,000-10,000
Billie GraceHerring
Univ. Texas,Austin
OCLC 1988 Applying the revisedMARC format for three-dimensional objects inmuseums
assessment
3,000-10,000
Esther G.Bierbaum
Univ. Iowa,Iowa City
OCLC 1988 Evaluating subjectcollections
designand test
3,000-10,000
Howard D.White
Drexel Univ.
OCLC 1988 Measurement of subjectscatter in thesuperintendent ofdocuments classification
casestudyanddesign
3,000-10,000
Lee Shiflett LSU
OCLC 1988 Subject representations inmonographic records
assessment
3,000-10,000
PamelaReekesMcKirdy
SimmonsCollege
OCLC 1988-89 Enhancing topicalsearching usingclassification clustering
exploratorystudy
3,000-10,000
Ray R. Larson Univ.California,Berkeley
OCLC 1988-89 Relationship betweenlibrary holdings andselection sources
surveyanalysis
3,000-10,000
JudithSerebnick
Indiana Univ.
OCLC 1988-89 Automated documentarchitecture processing andtagging (ADAPT)
design NA Stuart L.Weibel
OCLC
OCLC 1988-89 Bibliographic control anddocument architecture inhypermedia databases
assessment
NA RolandHjerppe
OCLC
OCLC 1988-89 Cataloger's assistant;prototype system forsupporting the catalogingfunction
designandtesting
NA Diane Vizine-Goetz
OCLC
OCLC 1988-89 Cataloging time andworkflow studies; in 1public and 3 academiclibraries
casestudy
NA Chandra G.Prabha
OCLC
OCLC 1988-89 Design of interfaces anddatabases for electronicmedia (DIADEM)
assessment
NA Martha J.Lindeman
OCLC
OCLC 1988-89 Document imageprocessing toolbox
design NA John C.Handley
OCLC
OCLC 1988-89 Enhanced bibliographicretrieval
assessment
NA Martin Dillon OCLC
OCLC 1988-89 The Experimental LibrarySystem (XLS)
designandtesting
NA Thomas B.Hickey
OCLC
Privately funded library research
34
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
CLR 1989 Knowledge management:expanding the scholarlyrole of research libraries
assess-ment
182,808 Johns HopkinsUniversity
PolicyResearchInstitute,UniversityTexasAustin
1989 AIDS information servicesin U.S. public libraries:national comparison ofattitudes
survey W.BernardLukenbill
University ofTexas, Austin
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1989 University Libraries andScholarly Communication
baseline study
AnthonyCummings etal.
CLR 1989 Academic administrators’views on the role of collegelibraries
surveyandanalysis
1,830 LarryHardesty &David Kasser
EckerdCollege
CLR 1989 Unobtrusive testing ofreference service in adivisional academic library
casestudy
1,800 Cheryl Elzy,Alan Nourie,F.W.Lancaster
Illinois StateUniversityNormal--Bloomington
CLR 1989 Scope and impact ofbookmobile service in theU.S.
assessment
3,000 Bert R. Boyce& Judith I.Boyce
LSU
CLR 1989 Use of MARC formats forcataloging art objects
fieldtest
20,000 MuseumComputerNetwork,Syracuse, NY
CLR 1989 Editing efficiency of an on-line bibliographicinformation system
casestudy
2,350 NorthCarolina StateUniversity,Raleigh
CLR 1989 Impact of interdisciplinaryresearch on librarycollection-building
assess-ment
3,000 RutgersUniversity
CLR 1989 Economic analysis ofscholarly periodical costs
baseline study
27,800 StanfordUniversity
CLR 1989 Test of measures andcorrelates of academiclibrary performance
fieldtest
3,000 University ofCalifornia,Berkeley
CLR 1989 Humanists’ use of libraries casestudy
23,000 University ofIllinois,Chicago
CLR 1989 Application of behavioralresearch methodology toenvironmental designproblems in libraries
explora-torystudy
2,587 University ofIllinois,Urbana
CLR 1989 Improving subjectsearching in online catalogs
exploratorystudy
Karen MarkeyDrabenstott &Diane Vizine-Goetz
Univ.Michigan;OCLC
Privately funded library research
35
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
CLR 1989 Advanced retrievalmethods for online catalogs
surveyanddesignofmodel
Edward A.Fox
VirginiaPolytechnicInstitute andState Univ.
OCLC 1989-90 General structure of aknowledge base for Anglo-American cataloging rules
exploratorystudy
3,000-10,000
Ling HweyJeng
Univ.Maryland,College Park
OCLC 1989-90 Identifying barriers toeffective subject access inlibrary catalogs
casestudy
3,000-10,000
F.W.Lancaster
Univ. Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
OCLC 1989-90 Investigating the structureof LCC and LCSH:developing a knowledgebase
assessment
3,000-10,000
DagobertSoergel
Univ.Maryland,College Park
OCLC 1989-90 Toward integration ofonline resources
exploratorystudy
3,000-10,000
Linda C.Smith et al.
Univ. Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
OCLC 1989-90 The interlibrary loanprocess; data from 1 publicand 1 academic library
casestudy
NA Chanrda G.Prabha
OCLC
CLR 1990 Environmental factors inprofessional developmentactivities: does type ofacademic library affiliationmake a difference?
surveyanalysis
2,936 W. MichaelHavener andPhilip Worrell
University ofOklahoma
AmericanLibraryAssocia-tion
1990 Information Services toSmall Businesses fromPublic Libraries
designandfieldtest
10,000 Evelyn Daniel University ofNorthCarolina atChapel Hill
UniversityIllinois,Urbana-Cham-paign
1990 Gender differences inattitudes toward usingcomputers in libraries: anexploratory study
casestudy
1,600 Frances F.Jacobson
UniversityHigh SchoolLibrary,University ofIllinois atUrbana-Champaign
MillbrookPress, Inc.
1990 The Millbrook Report: thechanging role of the schoollibrary
inter-views&survey
CLR 1990 Comparison of on-line andmanual search capabilitiesof students
casestudy
1,000 Kent StateUniversity
CLR 1990 Information seekingbehavior of scientists
casestudy
5,150 University ofColorado,Boulder
Privately funded library research
36
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
CLR 1990 Study of searchingstrategies on CD-ROM
32,512 University ofIllinois,Champaign-Urbana
OCLC 1990 Public libraries and theINTERNET/NREN, toexplore roles for the publiclibrary in the networkedenvironment
survey 10,000 Charles R.McClure et al.
SyracuseUniv.
OCLC 1990-91 Automatic hierarchicalorganization of phrasesusing machine-readabledictionary information
designandprototype
3,000-10,000
Amy J.Warner
Univ.Michigan
OCLC 1990-91 Determining the content ofmachine-readablesubdivision records
exploratorystudy
3,000-10,000
Karen MarkeyDrabenstott
Univ.Michigan
OCLC 1990-91 Expert system interface toLibrary of Congress subjectheadings
design 3,000-10,000
PadminiSrinivasan
Univ. Iowa,Iowa City
OCLC 1990-91 Scholars' access to thedocuments they cite
surveyanalysis
3,000-10,000
Keith Swigger TexasWoman'sUniv.
OCLC 1990-91 Obsolete Library ofCongress Subject headings
assessment anddesign
NA Roy Cheng etal.
WesternIllinois Univ.& OCLC
OCLC 1990-91 Record matching forauthority control
assess-ment
NA Edward T.O'Neill
OCLC
Universityof IllinoisSILS
1991 National opinion poll onpublic library issues
survey 25,000 LeighEstabrook
University ofIllinoisLibraryResearchCenter
CLR 1991 Conference on publiclibrary effectiveness
confer-ence
16,760 DrexelUniversity
CLR 1991 Comparison of journal useto reported relative value,college discipline, andsubscription cost
assess-ment
3,000 Texas A&MUniversity
CLR 1991 Effects of integratinginformation technology onjob classification andcompensation systems
casestudy
18,560 AnneWoodsworth
University ofPittsburgh
OCLC 1991 Public libraries and theINTERNET/NREN, toexplore roles for the publiclibrary in the networkedenvironment
survey 10,000 Charles R.McClure et al.
SyracuseUniversity
Privately funded library research
37
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
Assoc.CollegeResearchLibraries& Con-sultingPsycholo-gists Press
1991-92 Shattering our stereotype:librarians’ new image
surveyandanalysis
15,000 Mary JaneScherdin
EdgewoodCollegeLibrary
OCLC 1992 Enhancing a new designfor subject access to on-line catalogues
casestudy
10,000 KarenDrabenstott
University ofMichigan
CLR 1992 Interlibrary loan cost study assessment
10,000 ARL
CLR 1992 Determining factorsleading Earlham Collegegraduates to enter libraryschools
casestudy
1,000 EarlhamCollege
CLR 1992 Functionality of on-linecatalogs
assess-ment
11,000 Charles R.Hildreth
Charles R.Hildreth,Springfield, IL
CLR 1992 Price discrimination ofeconomics journals
assess-ment
3,109 George A.Chressanthus& June D.Chressanthus
MississippiStateUniversity
CLR 1992 Decision-making processfor collection developmentin libraries
casestudy
6,359 SimmonsCollege
CLR 1992 Effectiveness ofaffirmative actionguidelines on recruitmentand promotion of minoritylibrarians
casestudy
2,879 University ofArizona,Tucson
CLR 1992 Users’ persistence inscanning postings in an on-line public access catalog
casestudy
5,330 Stephen E.Wiberley, Jr.,et al
University ofIllinois,Chicago
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1992 Research Libraries Project 25,000 ARL &Association ofAmericanUniversities
OCLC 1992-93 Electronic texts andtraditional indexes: a studyof applicability andperformance
casestudy
3,000-10,000
Elizabeth D.Liddy
SyracuseUniv.
OCLC 1992-93 Measuring diversity inpublic library collections
surveyanddesign
3,000-10,000
JudithSerebnick &Frank Quinn
Indiana Univ.
OCLC 1992-93 Document ranking usingsignature files
exploratorystudy
NA Dik Lun Lee Ohio StateUniv.
Privately funded library research
38
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OCLC 1992-93 Estimating interlibrary loanvolume in 1993; includespublic libraries
statisticalanalysis
NA Chandra G.Prabha
OCLC
OCLC 1992-93 Experimental linguisticindexing for informationretrieval (ELIXIR)
exploratorystudy
NA C. Jean Godby& Bradley C.Watson
OCLC
OCLC 1992-93 Modeling user'spreferences for documentdelivery
surveyanalysis
NA Mark T.Kinnucan
Univ. WesternOntario
UniversityIllinois,Urbana-Cham-paign
1992 or1993
Logical reasoning andretrieval performance
fieldtest andanalysis
500 Bryce Allen UniversityIllinois,Urbana-Champaign
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1993 Economics of electroniclibrary of the future
baseline study
210,000 PrincetonUniversity
CLR 1993 Information-seekingpatterns of facultymembers and their use ofan on-line system
casestudy
3,518 Ingrid Hsieh-Yee
CatholicUniversity ofAmerica
CLR 1993 Information-seekingprocess among population-studies researchers
casestudy
4,000 Johns HopkinsUniversity
CLR 1993 Cost and beneficial impactsof library functions
assess-ment
97,612 Paul Kantor,JoannaD’Esposito-Wachtmann,TefkoSaracevic
RutgersUniversity
Camilleand HenryDreyfusFndtn.
1993 Cost-effectiveness ofdistributive access modelof electronic library as partof Fndtn.’s Planning Grantsfor Chemical Informatics
assess-ment
15,000 WashingtonUniversity
HenryLuceFndtn.
1993 New electronic virtuallibrary system, incollaboration with librariesof Harvard University andYale University
develop-ment
300,000 EmoryUniversity
J.M.KaplanFndtn.,O’ReillyandAssoc-iates
1993 Project GAIN: Connectingrural public libraries to theInternet [in New YorkState]
pilotproject
65,000 Charles R.McClure et al.
InformationManagementConsultantServices, viaNYSERnet,Inc.
Privately funded library research
39
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
PLA 1993 Information about libraryprograms servingmulticultural and/ormultilingual populations
nationalsurvey
1,000 Lee Olivier,Robert Belvin,SylviaManoogian
Services toMulticulturalPopulationsCommittee ofthe PLA
OCLC 1993 Empirical test of gophersearching using threeorganizational schemes
fieldtest
10,000 C. Olivia Frost& JosephJanes
University ofMichigan
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1993 Research Libraries Project 50,000 ARL &Association ofAmericanUniversities
IllinoisStateLibrary
1994 Impact of school librarymedia centers on academicachievement
survey 11,000 EdwardLakner
University ofIllinoisLibraryResearchCenter
IllinoisStateLibrary
1994 Impact of ISL per capitagrant program on quality oflibrary service
survey 6,000 EdwardLakner
University ofIllinoisLibraryResearchCenter
OCLC 1994 Developing controlmechanisms for intellectualaccess for discipline-basedlibraries
modeldevelop-ment
10,000 Marcia LeiZent
Kent StateUniversity
CLR 1994 Cost-benefits of accesscompared to ownershipcosts for expensiveresearch journals
assess-ment
54,012 Eleanor A.Gossen andSuzanneIrving
University atAlbanyFndtn.,Albany, NY
CLR 1994 Benchmarking pilot projecton interlibrary loan
pilotproject
17,540 Intern.SystemsServices Corp.and Jack A.Siggins
ARL
CLR 1994 Analytical framework andbaseline for networkedinformation resources andservices
baseline study
25,000 Coalition forNetworkedInformation
CLR 1994 Search patterns of in-library on-line catalogusers
casestudy
4,083 University ofCalifornia,Santa Cruz
CLR 1994 Attitudes of municipal andcounty officials towardpublic libraries
surveyandanalysis
12,000 University ofIllinois,LibraryResearchCenter
CarnegieCorporation of NewYork
1994 Implications of technologydevelopments for highereducation and scholarlycommunication
baseline study
180,000 Commissionon Preserva-tion andAccess
Privately funded library research
40
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
NathanCummngsFndtn.
1994 Forums to assess societalimpact of emerginginternational informationinfrastructure
confer-ence
10,000 AspenInstitute
MardagFndtn.
1994 Library Equity andExcellence Project,designed to support libraryimprovement and schoolreform in elementaryschool libraries in SaintPaul
demon-strationproject
105,000 Saint PaulPublicEducationFund, SaintPaul, MN
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1994 Comprehensive evaluationmethodology for ongoingactivities in creating digitallibrary
develop-ment
700,000 ColumbiaUniversity
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1994 Research project oneconomics of electroniclibrary of the future
assess-ment
290,000 PrincetonUniversity
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1994 Journal Storage Project, tomake back issues or coreperiodicals available tofaculty and students indigital format
pilotphaseofproject
700,000 Univ.Michigan
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1994 Journal Storage Project testsites
fieldtests
75,000 Five privatecolleges
KelloggFndtn.
1995 Buildings, books, andbytes: libraries andcommunities in the digitalage; report on public’sopinion of library leaders’vision of the future
surveyandanalysis
100,000 BentonFoundation
H.W.WilsonFndtn.
1995 Concerns about fundraisingby public institutions:public libraries as a casestudy
casestudy
37,950 Thomas A.Jeavons
UrbanLibrariesCouncil
OCLC 1995 Creating DTDs via the GB-Engine and Fred
designand test
NA Keith E.Shafer
OCLC
CLR 1995 Information locator systemprototype
demon-strationproject
24,880 New YorkState Library,Albany
W.K.KelloggFndtn.
1995 Institutional and policyissues in development ofDigital Library
assess--ment
650,000 HarvardUniversity
John andJamesKnightFndtn.
1995 Project at branches servingdisadvantagedneighborhoods
demon-strationproject
100,000 PhiladelphiaFree Library
Privately funded library research
41
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
LillyEndow-ment
1995 Technological developmentin theological libraries
appliedresearch
133,650 AuburnTheologicalSeminary
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1995 Electronic journals in fieldof religious studies1995
feasibil-itystudy
250,000 EmoryUniversity
AndrewW.MellonFndtn.
1995 Study of interlibrary loan assess-ment
160,000 ARL
OCLC 1995 Creating DTDs via the GB-Engine and Fred
designand test
NA Keith E.Shafer
OCLC
OCLC 1995 Effect of linkage structureon retrieval performanceand user response in ahypertext-basedbibliographic system
fieldtest
5,000 AlexandraDimitroff &DietmarWolfram
Univ.Wisconsin,Milwaukee
IllinoisStateLibrary
1996 Impact of cooperativecollection development onacademic libraries ofIllinois
survey 5,000 EdwardLakner
University ofIllinoisLibraryResearchCenter
IllinoisStateLibrary
1996 15-year cost-benefitanalysis of Illinois publiclibraries
statisti-calanalysis
6,000 EdwardLakner
University ofIllinoisLibraryResearchCenter
OCLC 1996 Impact of scholarlyjournals on scholarlycommunication: areference and citation study
statisti-calanalysis
3,000-10,000
StephenP.Harter
Indiana Univ.
OCLC 1996 An experimental study ongraphical tables of contents
designandtesting
3,000-10,000
Xia Lin Univ.Kentucky
OCLC 1996 Analyzing the viability ofusing peer group holdingsas an evaluation tool forpublic library adult fiction
statistical study
3,000-10,000
James H.Sweetland &Judith J.Senkevitch
Univ.Wisconsin,Milwaukee
OCLC 1996 A relational thesaurus:modeling semanticrelationships using frames
exploratorystudy
3,000-10,000
RebeccaGreen
Univ.Maryland,College Park
OCLC 1996 Automatic subjectassignment via theScorpion System; buildingtools for automatic subjectrecognition based on well-known schemes
design NA Keith E.Shafer
OCLC
Privately funded library research
42
Sponsor Program Focus Type Funding P.I. Institution
OCLC 1996 Characteristics of articlesrequested through OCLCinterlibrary loan
statisticalanalysis
NA Chandra G.Prabha
OCLC
Librariesfor theFuture
1996 Private philanthropicfunding of public libraries
baseline study
NA Linda Kravitzet al.
Libraries forthe Future
OCLC 1996 Impact of scholarlyjournals on scholarlycommunication: areference and citation study
statisticalanalysis
3,000-10,000
StephenP.Harter
Indiana Univ.
OCLC 1996 An experimental study ongraphical tables of contents
designandtesting
3,000-10,000
Xia Lin Univ.Kentucky
OCLC 1996 Analyzing the viability ofusing peer group holdingsas an evaluation tool forpublic library adult fiction
statistical study
3,000-10,000
James H.Sweetland &Judith J.Senkevitch
Univ.Wisconsin,Milwaukee
OCLC 1996 A relational thesaurus:modeling semanticrelationships using frames
exploratorystudy
3,000-10,000
RebeccaGreen
Univ.Maryland,College Park
OCLC 1996 Automatic subjectassignment via theScorpion System; buildingtools for automatic subjectrecognition based on well-known schemes
design NA Keith E.Shafer
OCLC
OCLC 1996 Characteristics of articlesrequested through OCLCinterlibrary loan
statisticalanalysis
NA Chandra G.Prabha
OCLC
This information was compiled from the National Library of Education’s ERICresources, NSF Searchable Databases, the Foundation Center’s Grants Index, theChronicle of Philanthropy, Libraries for the Future’s database on philanthropic supportfor public libraries, and other sources.
43
Table VA: Journal articles(listed in chronological order)
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Lois Buttlar &Rajinder Garcha
Kent State University& University ofToledo Library
Organizational structure inacademic libraries
Examines how the work of academiclibrarians is structured and whethertraditional functions of public servicesand technical services are still separated
survey &analysis
Alan R. Samuelsand Charles R.McClure
1983 Dept. ofLibrary/Educa-tionalTechnology,University of NorthCarolina,Greensboro; Schoolof Library Science,University ofOklahoma
Utilization of Information forDecision Making underVarying OrganizationalClimate Conditions in PublicLibraries
Addresses the problem, Is organizationalinformation-processing related toorganizational climate in a public librarysetting?
case study
Peter Hiatt 1983 School ofLibrarianship,University ofWashington, Seattle
Should Professionals BeManagers?
Discusses confusion betweenadministration and management; formalmanagement techniques and principlesmust be applied to library administration
case study
Stuart Glogoff 1983 University ofDelaware
Communication Theory’sRole in the ReferenceInterview
Examines how communication sciencetheory contributes to the "negotiation" ofreference questions between user andlibrarian
literaturereview andanalysis
William SkehWong and DavidS. Zubatsky
1983 University of Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
The First-Time AppointedAcademic Library Director1970-1980: A Profile
Investigates socio-demographiccharacteristics of first-time appointeddirectors, as well as their academictraining and professional activities beforeappointment
survey-basedanalysis
Marilyn DomasWhite
1983 University ofMaryland, CollegePark
The Reference EncounterModel
Develops a model of the referenceinterview that incorporates humaninformation processing, particularly theschema ideas of Minsky and othertheorists
explor-atorystudy
Margaret E.Monroe
1983 University ofWisconsin, Madison
An Approach to TheoreticalFoundations for ReaderServices
Examines theory about reader services"as a construct of principles whichinteract in such a way as to permitexplanation or prediction of results oftheir practical application”
researchreport
Elaine Trzebiatow-ski
1984 Abbott NorthwesternLibrary, Minneapolis
End User Study onBRS/After Dark
Evaluates first-time end user reactions toon-line database searching on the menu-driven BRS/After Dark search system
case study
John W. Head1984
1984 Clarion University ofPennsylvania
The National Rural LibraryReference Survey
Discussion of survey of 1100 rurallibraries
surveyanalysis
GlenieceArmstrongRobinson
1984 Dallas Public Library Management DevelopmentPrograms in Large PublicLibraries
Asks how libraries are planning andestablishing management developmentprograms
research
Terry L. Weechand HerbertGoldhor
1984 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,University of Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
Reference Clientele and theReference Transaction inFive Illinois Public Libraries
With data gather from a user survey,study examines feasibility of amethodology for obtaining data onbehavior and perceptions
case study
John N. DePewand Anne MarieAllison
1984 School of Libraryand InformationStudies, FloridaState University,Tallahassee;University of CentralFlorida Libraries
Factors Affecting AcademicLibrary Administration,1976-1981
Reexamines surveys done in 1976 and1981 to determine if "libraryadministrators had control over theirown libraries, and to what extent . . .that control had been diluted by internaland/or external groups, administratorsand staff"
surveyanalysis
Ronald R. Powell 1984 School of LibraryScience, Universityof Michigan
Library Use and Personality:The Relationship betweenLocus of Control andFrequency of Use
Examines the relationship betweenpersonality, as represented by Rotter’sinternal vs. external control ofreinforcement, and frequency of publiclibrary use
researchreport
Journal articles
44
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
S.L. Baker 1984 University of Illinois Does the Use of a Demand-Oriented Selection PolicyReduce Overall CollectionQuality?
Examines the quality versus demanddebate, and finds no evidence to provethat demand-driven libraries have poorerbook collections than other libraries
literaturereview andanalysis
Barbara Herrin,Louis R. Pointon &Sara Russell
1985 Personality andCommunications Behaviorsof Model School LibraryMedia Specialists
Examines stereotype of the schoollibrarian
case study
Susan E. Hilcheyand Jitka M.Hurych
1985 Argonne NationalLaboratory;Founders MemorialLibrary, NorthernIllinois University
User Satisfaction or UserAcceptance? StatisticalEvaluation of an OnlineReference Service
Evaluates user satisfaction with an on-line reference service
surveyanalysis
Ernest R.Alexander
1985 Dept. of UrbanPlanning, Universityof Wisconsin,Milwaukee
Cost Allocation Issues inInterlibrary Systems
Explores questions of allocating serviceand transactional costs
case study
Grace Donoho 1985 Old High ElementarySchool, Bentonville,AR
Measures of AudiovisualProduction Activities withStudents
Describes library media program thatuses local audiovisual production as afocal point; provides a technique formeasuring impact
case study
Esther GreenBierbaum
1985 School of LibraryScience, Universityof Iowa
The Third Dimension:Dealing with Objects inPublic Library Collections
Based on a survey of object collectionsin selected public libraries; notes inverserelationship between library staff sizeand likelihood of having objects incollection.
survey -based study
Bonnie C. Carroll& Donald W. King
1985 U.S. Dept. of EnergyOffice of Scientificand TechnicalInformation & KingResearch Inc.
Value of Information Focuses on data and methods toquantify value in the hope that this willassist in the budget formulation processof libraries
baselinestudy
Darlene E.Weigand and NoelRyan
1985 University ofWisconsin, Madison;Mississauga LibrarySystem (Ontario)
Managerial Competence andSkills: A Joint Study in theUnited States and Canada
Attempts to determine whether top-levelmanagers of libraries have thoseadministrative skills which facilitateeffective management
survey-based study
Nancy Birch,Maurice P.Marchant &Nathan M. Smith
1986 Brigham YoungUniversity, HI;School of Libraryand InformationScience, BrighamYoung University, UT
Perceived Role Conflict, RoleAmbiguity, and ReferenceLibrarian Burnout in PublicLibraries
Maslach Burnout Inventory was mailedto 825 reference librarians and resultsanalyzed using frequencies andregression subprograms; resultscompared to studies of teachers
survey-based study
Mary Howes 1986 Miller School,Westmont, IL
Evaluation of the Effects ofa Public Library SummerReading Program onChildren’s Reading Scoresbetween First and SecondGrade
Comparison of students who participatedin summer reading programs and thosewho did not
case study
Robert Grover andJack Glazier
1986 School of Libraryand InformationManagement,Emporia StateUniversity; School ofLibrary andInformation Science,University ofMissouri, Columbia
A Conceptual Framework forTheory Building in Libraryand Information Science
Proposes a model that displaysrelationships among phenomena andvarious levels of theory and research.Proposed taxonomy provides aframework for researchers and theorists.
explora-torystudy
Stephen E. James 1986 School of Libraryand InformationStudies, AtlantaUniversity
Economic Hard Times andPublic Library Use: A CloseLook at the Librarians’Axiom
In contrast with a British survey, authorfinds no data to support rule of thumbthat U.S. public library use increasesduring economic hard times.
research
John Budd 1986 SoutheasternLouisiana University
Interlibrary Loan Service: AStudy of Turnaround Time
Studies use of OCLC to provide data onturnaround time and comparison overtime
researchreport
David F. Kohl andLizabeth A. Wilson
1986 University ofColorado, Boulder;University of Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
Effectiveness of Course-Integrated BibliographicInstruction in ImprovingCoursework
Study supports "major trend emerging inbibliographic instruction of a cognitiveapproach to research instruction."
case study
Journal articles
45
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Peter Hernon andCharles McClure
1987 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,Simmons College;School ofInformation Studies,Syracuse University
Quality of Data Issues inUnobtrusive Testing ofLibrary Reference Service:Recommendations andStrategies
Discusses issues relating to thereliability, validity, utility, andinformation "value" of unobtrusivetesting
case study
HerbertGoldhor
1987 Library ResearchCenter, University ofIllinois, Urbana-Champaign
An Analysis of Data on theNumber of Public LibraryReference Questions
Analyzes data collected between 1970and 1985 in 9 states
researchreport
Mary Ellen(Kennedy) Collins
1987 Purdue University Attitudes of Public ServiceAcademic Librarians towardthe Elderly
Older Americans are increasinglyprominent as students in highereducation; librarians’ attitudes towardthem have changed
surveyanalysis
Robert N. Broadus 1987 School of LibraryScience, Universityof North Carolina,Chapel Hill
Information Needs ofHumanities Scholars: AStudy of Requests Made atthe National HumanitiesCenter
Analysis of research requests andcompared with results of citation andlibrary use studies
case study
Daniel Arrigona &EleanorMathews
1988 Austin Public Library(T1) and Iowa StateUniversity
A Use Study of an AcademicLibrary Reference Collection
Types of materials consulted wereinterpreted by use indexes, to testhypothesis that librarians and patronsuse the reference collection differently
case study
Gene V. Glass andIsabel Schon
1988 College of Education,Arizona StateUniversity, Tempe
Effects of an English-onlyLaw on Public LibraryAcquisition Policies,Practices, and Librarians’Attitudes toward Books inSpanish for Children andYoung Adults
Evaluates effects of the CaliforniaEnglish-only law in a "pretest-posttestnonequivalent control group quasi-experiment"
case study
Thomas Childers 1988 College ofInformation Studies,Drexel University
Do Library Systems Make aDifference?
A Study of the effect of federatedsystems was performed on thepopulation of system and nonsystemcounties in Pennsylvania
case study
Charles A. Seavey 1988 Graduate LibrarySchool, UniversityArizona, Tucson
Measuring the impact ofpublic library systemformation on local libraryservice: a Wisconsin casestudy
Discusses four studies measuring levelsof library service; develops and testshypotheses about impact of systemdevelopment
case study
Janet M. Lange 1988 independentconsultant
Public Users, Nonusers, andTypes of Library Use
Based on phone poll of county residentsof a southwestern state, comparesexpected levels and types of use withactual situation.
surveyanalysis
Herbert Goldhor 1988 Library ResearchCenter, University ofIllinois, Urbana-Champaign
The Effect of Publicity onInterlibrary Loan Requestsin Ten Illinois PublicLibraries
Examines whether a publicity programhad a demonstrable effect on thebehavior of patrons regarding interlibraryloan
case study
Holly G. Willett 1988 School of Libraryand InformationStudies, University ofWisconsin
The ChangingDemographics of Children’sServices
Analysis of current library use and U.S.demographic trends to predict futureneeds.
researchreport
Joan Durrance andDoris Preston
1988 University ofMichigan
Common Public PolicyIssues Faced by theNation’s Communities:Forging a Public LibraryResponse
Drawing on studies, authors offer waysto provide users with electronicinformation
posi-tionpaper
Elizabeth J.McNeer
1988 Wright StateUniversity Library
The Mentoring Influence inthe Careers of Women ARLDirectors
Examines role of mentoring, based oninterviews with 16 directors
survey andanalysis
Sally Felix 1989 PLA Governance of PublicLibraries: CommitteeFindings
survey andanalysis
Lawrence W.S.Auld
1989 Dept. of Library andInformation Studies,East CarolinaUniversity
GRE General Test Scoresand Grade Point Averagesas Predictors of ProfessionalSalaries for Librarians
Some correlations found for males andfor persons employed in some types oflibraries; undergraduate grade pointaverages were the most frequentcontributors to these correlations.
researchreport
Journal articles
46
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Charles A. Seavey 1989 Graduate LibrarySchool, UniversityArizona, Tucson
The public library in society:the relationship of librariesand socioeconomicconditions
Examines factors associated with thedevelopment or success of the publiclibrary; examines numerical measuresand relates them to socioeconomicfactors
explora-torystudy
Connie Van Fleet 1989 Indiana University Public Library Service toOlder Adults: SurveyFindings and theirImplications
Examines national survey findings andexplores need for common servicephilosophy based on lifelong learning
surveyanalysis
Michael J. Fimian,Sandra A.Benedict & StacieJohnson
1989 New EnglandImages; Winston-Salem/ForsythCounty Schools;Amos CottageRehabilitationHospital & EastForsyth High School
The Measure ofOccupational Stress andBurnout among LibraryMedia Specialists
Discusses development of MediaSpecialist Stress Inventory; "regressionanalyses indicated that four of the sixstress factors predicted significantburnout levels."
researchreport
Robert Burgin 1989 School of Libraryand InformationSciences, NorthCarolina CentralUniversity
Guttman Scale Analysis: AnApplication to LibraryScience
Develops a Guttman scale ofrestrictiveness in dealing with overdues;relates data from a 1986 survey to thescale
surveyanalysis
V. Lonnie Lawson 1989 Ward EdwardsLibrary, CentralMissouri StateUniversity
Using a Computer-AssistedInstruction Program toReplace the TraditionalLibrary Tour: AnExperimental Study
Asks if freshmen who use a computer-assisted instruction program had higherpost-test means than students who tooka traditional library tour
case study
Choong Han Kim 1990 Indiana StateUniversity, TerreHaute
Occupational Users andUses of the Public Library
Tests three hypotheses concerningpublic library users and uses
researchreport
Charles D.Patterson andDonna W. Howell
1990 Louisiana StateUniversity; Universityof Georgia, Athens
Library User Education:Assessing the Attitudes ofThose Who Teach
Findings of a survey to determine theeducational preparedness and attitudesof librarians who participate inbibliographic instruction
surveyanalysis
Dong Y. Jeong 1990 School ofCommunication,Information andLibrary Studies,Rutgers University
The Nature of theInformation Sector in theInformation Society: AnEconomic and SocietalPerspective
Proposes a new classification model ofthe "information economy."
positionpaper
Kathleen Garland 1990 School ofInformation andLibrary Studies,University ofMichigan
Gender Differences inScholarly Publication amongFaculty in ALA AccreditedLibrary Schools
Analyzes recent productivity studies oflibrary and information science facultyand investigated gender differences inpublication among a sample of facultyover a five-year span
literaturereview andanalysis
Frances SmardoDowd
1990 School of Libraryand InformationStudies, TexasWomen’s University
Latchkey Children: ACommunity and PublicLibrary Phenomenon
Case studies, statistics, and survey dataabout a growing issue.
researchreport
Beth Sandore 1990 University of Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
Online Searching: WhatMeasure Satisfaction?
Describes a research project that usedquantitative measures to examineindicators of search satisfaction
case study
Thomas Childers,Cynthia Lopata &Brian Stafford
1991 College ofInformation Studies,Drexel University
Measuring the Difficulty ofReference Questions
Seeks to develop a measure of differinglevels of difficulty of reference questionshandled by the California interlibraryreference referral network
baselinestudy
Gillian S.Gremmels
1991 DePauw UniversityLibrary; IndianaUniversity
Reference in the PublicInterest: An Examination ofEthics
"Examines the validity of the neutralitystance as the primary response toreference questions that present ethicaldilemmas."
explora-torystudy
Helen M. Gothberg 1991 Graduate LibrarySchool, University ofArizona, Tucson
Time Management in PublicLibraries
Survey about how library directorsmanage their time
surveyanalysis
Cheryl Metoyer-Duran
1991 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,UCLA
Information-SeekingBehavior of Gatekeepers inEthnolinguisticCommunities: a Taxonomy
Presents a model for information-seekingbehavior of ethnolinguistic gatekeepers
researchreport
Journal articles
47
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Michael Bell andHerman L. Totten
1991 La Joya IndependentSchool District;University of NorthTexas
Interactional Patterns ofSchool Media Specialistswith School InstructionalStaff
Analysis of data collected from schoolmedia professionals in 19 academicallydistinguished public elementary schoolsin Texas
case study
Jim Scheppke, 1991 Oregon State Library The governance of publiclibraries: findings of thePLA Governance of PublicLibraries Committee
Discusses national survey aimed atdetermining governance of publiclibraries
survey &analysis
Kathleen Garland 1991 School ofInformation andLibrary Studies,University ofMichigan
Nature of Publications byLIS Faculty
Examines nature of literature producedby random sample of faculty in ALA-accredited schools of library andinformation science, 1980-84
researchreport
Maurice P.Marchant
1991 School of Libraryand InformationSciences, BrighamYoung University,Provo
What Motivates Adult Use ofPublic Libraries?
Examines four motivators to explainadult use of public libraries
literaturereview andanalysis
Prudence WardDalrymple,Timothy Cole,Bryce Allen &Debra WilcoxJohnson
1991 University of Illinois,Urbana-Champaign;University ofWisconsin, Madison
Measuring StatewideInterlibrary Loan amongMultitype Libraries: ATesting of Data CollectionApproaches
Describes an attempt to design and testa data collection process in Illinois
case study
Thura Mack 1991 University ofTennessee Libraries
A Model Methodology forSelecting Women’s StudiesCore Journals
Citation analysis provides a meaningfulevaluation tool for bibliographers andcollection managers
literaturereview andanalysis
Prudence WardDalrymple andDouglas L. Zweizig
1992 American LibraryAssociation; Schoolof Library andInformation Studies,University ofWisconsin, Madison
Users’ Experience ofInformation RetrievalSystems: An Exploration ofthe Relationship betweenSearch Experience andAffective Measures
Reports on factor analysis of affectivedata gathered from a study of searchingbehavior in two library catalogs
case study
James V.Carmichael, Jr.
1992 Dept. of Library andInformation Studies,University of NorthCarolina, Greensboro
The Male Librarian and theFeminine Image: A Surveyof Stereotype, Status, andGender Perceptions
Reports results of survey of malelibrarians relating to the maleprofessional stereotype and impact ofsocial expectations and gender-relatedwork issues
surveyanalysis
Christine M.Koontz
1992 Florida Resourcesand EnvironmentalAnalysis Center,Florida StateUniversity,Tallahassee
Public Library SiteEvaluation and Location:Past and Present Market-Based Modeling Tools forthe Future
Presents a new methodology forconstruction of location modeling forpublic libraries in diverse urbanenvironments
multi-disci-plinaryliteraturereview andanalysis
Robert M. Hayes 1992 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,UCLA
Measurement of Use andResulting Access AllocationDecisions
Presents a model for distribution of useof information records, and derives ameans for decision-making aboutallocation to various levels of access
case study
FariborzDamanpour andWilliam M. Evan
1992 Graduate School ofManagement,Rutgers University;Wharton School
The Adoption of Innovationsover Time: StructuralDeterminants andConsequences in Libraries
Delineated three groups of organizationsaccording to their rate of innovationsover time; characteristics andperformance were illustrated withempirical data from public libraries
researchreport
Mary Riskind 1992 Montclair PublicLibrary
Library Use as an EconomicIndicator
1991 survey of 39 NJ public libraries aidsin assessing relationship betweeneconomic well-being and library use.
surveyreport
Lois Buttlar andWilliam Caynon
1992 School of Libraryand InformationScience, Kent StateUniversity
Recruitment of Librariansinto the Profession: TheMinority Perspective
Examines why minorities choose tobecome librarians and which recruitingtechniques are believed most effective
researchreport
Holly G. Willett 1992 School of Libraryand InformationStudies, TexasWoman’s University
Public Library Directors inthe OrganizationalEnvironment: Four CaseStudies
Uses the resource dependence approachto open systems theory and thenegotiated social order perspective todiscuss activities and attitudes of 9directors of 4 California public libraries
case study
Journal articles
48
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Donald J. Kenneyand Gail McMillan
1992 University Libraries,Virginia Tech,Blacksburg
State Library Associations:How Well Do They SupportProfessional Development?
Seeks to determine how state libraryassociations perceive their missions tomembers in areas of professionaldevelopment and continuing education
surveyanalysis
GaryMarchionini,Sandra Dwiggins,Andrew Katz & XiaLin
1993 College of Libraryand InformationSciences, Universityof Maryland, CollegePark
Information Seeking in Full-Text End-User-OrientedSearch Systems: The Rolesof Domain and SearchExpertise
Explores effects of domain expertise andsearch expertise through assignedsearches in hypertext or CD-ROMdatabases
case study
Douglas J. Ernest 1993 Colorado StateUniversity Libraries,Fort Collins
Academic Libraries, Fee-Based Information Services,and the BusinessCommunity
Discussion of how librarians relate tolocal business people
surveyanalysis
Judith Dixon andFrances SmardoDowd
1993 Dallas Public Library;School of Libraryand InformationStudies, TexasWomen’s University
Should public librariesprogram for babies? Anational survey of children’scoordinators
Alisa J. Whitt1993
1993 Emory UniversityLibraries
The Information Needs ofLesbians
Describes survey of 141 lesbians andtheir information needs
surveyanalysis
Mary Niles Maackand Joanne E.Passet
1993 Graduate School ofLibrary &Information Science,UCLA; School ofLibrary &Information Science,Indiana University
Unwritten Rules: MentoringWomen Faculty
Examines role of mentoring of womenfaculty in library and information scienceduring past 50 years
survey andanalysis
Cheryl Metoyer-Duran
1993 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,UCLA
Cross-Cultural Research inEthnolinguisticCommunities:MethodologicalConsiderations
Methodological considerations related toconduct of research in culturally diversecommunities and provides strategies forpublic libraries seeking to undertakecommunity analyses
researchreport
Cheryl Metoyer-Duran
1993 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,UCLA
The Information andReferral Process inCulturally DiverseCommunities
Examines ethnic gatekeepers and theirviews on how to obtain information
case study
Gillian Allen 1993 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,University of Illinoisat Urbana-Champaign
An Application of the ActFrequency Approach in theStudy of Person-Job Fit
Investigates if the act frequencyapproach, used in psychologicalresearch, might clarify work of behaviorof librarians
explora-torystudy
Idrisa Pandit 1993 Mortensen LibraryProgram, Universityof Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Citation Errors in LibraryLiterature: A Study of FiveLibrary Science Journals
Examines five core library sciencejournals to study accuracy of citations
survey andanalysis
A. Neil Yerkey 1993 School ofInformation andLibrary Studies,SUNY Buffalo
Publishing in Library andInformation Science:Audience, Subjects,Affiliation, Source, andFormat
Examines 855 LIS-related documentsurrogates from 32 databases andcategorizes them according to whetherthey were written by persons workinginside or outside the LIS literature
survey-based study
Connie Van Fleet 1993 School of Libraryand InformationScience, LSU
Evidence of Communicationamong Public Librarians andLibrary and InformationScience Educators in PublicLibrary Journal Literature
Analysis of journal articles suggests thatpublic librarians and LIS educators usethe national journal literature as aninteractive communication system
researchreport
Douglas L. Zweizig 1993 School of Libraryand InformationScience, Universityof Wisconsin
The Children’s ServicesStory
Report and analysis of data from librariesparticipating in the Public Library DataService
surveyanalysis
Patricia M. Wallace1993
1993 University ofColorado Libraries
How Do Patrons Search theOnline Catalog When NoOne’s Looking? TransactionLog Analysis andImplications forBibliographic Instructionand System Design
Recorded user behavior unobtrusivelyand focuses on what happened duringthe search process
case study
Journal articles
49
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Bryn Geffert 1993 University of Illinois Community Networks inLibraries: the FreenetP.A.T.H.
Description of patrons use, role withinpublic libraries, sample referencequestions
case study
Daniel Suvak 1993 Walsh CollegeLibrary, NorthCanton, OH
Evaluating LSCA: TheEvidence from PrisonLibraries
Asks if LSCA, Title I, made a significantdifference in the quality of state prisonlibraries compared with federal libraries
researchreport
Frank W. Goudyand Ellen Altman
1993 Western IllinoisUniversity andUniversity ofArizona, Tucson
Local Public Library Fundingin the 1980s
Analysis suggests that libraries receivedan increasing share of local governmentfunds.
researchreport
Dennis Carrigan 1994 College of Libraryand InformationScience, Universityof Kentucky
Public Library Private Fund-Raising: A Report Based ona Survey
Analyzes results of questionnaire sent todirectors of 100 large public libraries.
surveyanalysis
Jerry P. Miller 1994 Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,Simmons College
The Relationship betweenOrganizational Culture andEnvironmental Scanning: ACase Study
Describes how differences inorganizational values influence frequencywith which decision makers use oral,written, and electronic sources ofinformation for environmental scanning
case study
Nancy A. VanHouse andThomas A.Childers
1994 School of Libraryand InformationStudies, University ofCalifornia, Berkeley;Drexel University
The Use of Public LibraryRoles for EffectivenessEvaluation
Examines roles from the PLA planningand measurement tools for their utility inevaluating public library effectiveness;data from Public Library EffectivenessStudy
surveyanalysis
Diane Prorak,Tania Gottschalk &Mike Pollastro
1994 University Library,University of Idaho
Teaching Method andPsychological Type inBibliographic Instruction:Effect on Student Learningand Confidence
"Will students learn more and beconfident about using the library iflibrarians teach using a small-group,active-learning method rather than alecture method?"
case study
Dian Walster 1994 University ofColorado, Denver
Applying an Attitude-Behavior Consistency Modelto Research in Library andInformation Science
Examines application of the Fishbein andAjzen model of attitude-behaviorconsistency to research in LIS
explora-torystudy
F.W. Lancaster,Cheryl Elzy, MaryJo Zeter, LauraMetzler & Yuen-Man Low
1994 University of Illinois;Illinois StateUniversity
Searching Databases on CD-ROM: Comparison of theResults of End-UserSearching with Results fromTwo Modes of Searching bySkilled Intermediaries
Results of 35 searches by users of theERIC database were compared withresults achieved by an experiencededucation librarian and a team ofexperienced librarians
case study
David Belanger 1995 Delaware CountyLibrary System (PA)
Board Games: Examiningthe Trustee/Director Conflict
Analyzes the Library Trustee andDirector Survey, done in Pennsylvania in1994
surveyanalysis
Shiao-Feng Su andF.W. Lancaster
1995 Division of Libraryand InformationSciences, San JoseState University;Graduate School ofLibrary andInformation Science,University of Illinois,Urbana-Champaign
Evaluation of ExpertSystems in ReferenceService Applications
Evaluates two systems designed to helplibrary users find sources to answer theirreference questions
case study
Sherry Shiuan Suand Charles Wm.Conaway
1995 Fe-Jen CatholicUniversity; School ofLibrary andInformation Studies,Florida StateUniversity
Information and a ForgottenMinority: Elderly ChineseImmigrants
Examines information needs of elderlyChinese immigrants; implications forimproved information services
explora-torystudy
Marcia J. Bates,Deborah N. Wilde,Susan Siegfried
1995 Graduate School ofEducation andInformation Studies,UCLA; Getty ArtHistory InformationProgram
Research practices ofhumanities scholars in anon-line environment: theGetty Online SearchingProject report no.3
Monitors database searching by visitingscholars at Getty Center for the Historyof Art and the Humanities
case study
Stanley E. & JimBradley,
1995 Illinois State Library A Study of Public LibraryReferenda in Illinois
Examines voting trends on library issuesbased on results of referenda from 1978through 1994
assess-ment
Eric Bryant 1995 Library Journal Pride & Prejudice Discusses nation’s first survey of gay andlesbian librarian service
surveyanalysis
Journal articles
50
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Debora Shaw 1995 School of Libraryand InformationScience, IndianaUniversity
Bibliographic DatabaseSearching by GraduateStudents in Language andLiterature: SearchStrategies, SystemInterfaces, and RelevanceJudgments
Observed graduate students as theysearched CD-ROM databases
case study
Richard Rubin 1995 School of Libraryand InformationScience, Kent StateUniversity
Upward Appraisal: What DoSubordinates ConsiderImportant in EvaluatingTheir Supervisors?
Employs a subordinate evaluationinstrument to identify those factors thatemployees of the Dayton-MontgomeryCounty Public Library value in theirsupervisors; implications foradministrators
case study
Douglas Raber 1995 School of Libraryand InformationalScience, Universityof Missouri,Columbia
A Conflict of Cultures:Planning vs. Tradition inPublic Libraries
Examines nature of conflicts that mayarise in confrontation of culturesinherent in the Public LibraryDevelopment Program and traditionallibrary cultures
researchreport
John R.Ottensmann
1995 School of Public andEnvironmentalAffairs, IndianaUniversity
Using a Gravity Model toPredict Circulation in aPublic Library System
Development of model based onprinciples of spatial interaction
case study
David N. Ammons 1995 University of Georgia Overcoming theinadequacies ofperformance measurementin local government: thecase of libraries and leisureservices
Using examples from public libraries andcommunity parks, study argues thatincreased emphasis on performancecomparisons could encourage greateraccountability
case study
Qun G. Jiao,AnthonyOnwuegbuzie &Art A. Lichtenstein
1996 Baruch College,CUNY; University ofCentral Arkansas
Library Anxiety:Characteristics of "At-Risk"College Students
Based on study of 493 students,examines factors that predict libraryanxiety; a setwise multiple regressionanalysis reveals eight variables involved
case study
Affleck, Mary Ann 1996 Capital Community-Technical CollegeLibrary, Hartford, CT
Burnout amongBibliographic InstructionLibrarians
Administered Maslach Burnout Inventoryand a Role Questionnaire to bibliographicinstruction librarians in colleges in NewEngland
survey-based study
Deanna B.Marcum
1996 Council on LibraryResources
Redefining Communitythrough the Public Library
Uses case studies and surveys tospeculate about how public library cancontribute to social well-being
positionpaper
Hector Correa andVirginia Correa
1996 Graduate School ofPublic andInternational Affairs,University ofPennsylvania;ElectronicInformationNetwork, Pittsburgh,PA
An Application of Input-Output Analysis to theAdministration of a Library
Construction of an input-output modelmakes it possible to forecast personnelrequirements resulting from changes inexternal demands for library services
researchreport
Lynda M. Baker 1996 Library andInformation ScienceProgram, WayneState University
A Study of the Nature ofInformational Needed byWomen with MultipleSclerosis
Based on Miller’s theory of informationseeking, the study asked 93 women toassess a general or specific pamphlet onone of two topics; discussion ofmethodology for studying informationneeds
case study
Diane DiMartinoand Lucinda R.Zoe
1996 Newman Library,Baruch College,CUNY
End-User Full-TextSearching: Access orExcess?
Examined and assessed the searchtechniques of trained end-users to see ifthey were searching effectively
case study
Debora Shaw 1996 School of Libraryand InformationScience, IndianaUniversity
Undergraduate Use of CD-ROM Databases:Observations of Human-Computer Interaction andRelevance Judgments
Observed freshmen as they searchedbibliographic databases
case study
Linda M.Wolfgram
1996 School of Libraryand InformationScience, IndianaUniversity
The Effects of Automationon School Library MediaCenters
Considers effects of automation basedon the literature and on perceptions ofschool media specialists
exploratorystudy
Journal articles
51
Researcher Year Institution Project (title) Focus Type
Zorana Ercegovac 1997 Dept. of Library andInformation Science,UCLA
The Interpretation of"Library Use" in the Age ofDigital Libraries: Virtualizingthe Name
Examines the degree to which collegestudents agree in interpreting the term"library use."
case study
SuzanneHildenbrand1997
1997 School ofInformation andLibrary Studies,SUNY Buffalo
Still Not Equal: Closing theLibrary Gender Gap
Analysis of trends in opportunities andsalaries for women
positionpaper
Hazel M. Davis &Ellen Altman,
1997 Victoria University,New Zealand;Glendale CommunityCollege, AZ
The relationship betweencommunity lifestyles andcirculation patterns in publiclibraries
Uses market research techniques toexamine whether circulation patternsreflect distinctive lifestyles
survey &analysis
52
Table VB: Dissertations and other unpublished studies(Listed in chronological order )
Researcher Date Institution Project Focus TypeBetty J.Morris
University ofAlabama
Ph.D. diss StudentAssistants in AcademicLibraries
Determines methods and materialsmost frequently used to train studentassistants.
surveyandanalysis
Josephine YuChen Sche
1983 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss EducationSystems for Librarianship inthe Federal Republic ofGermany, the U.K. and U.S.
Describes library education systemsand interprets each systemaccording to its development sincethe 1880s.
histor-ical study
AdelineWoodWilkes
1983 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss ManagerialFunctions by BeginningAcademic Librarians
Describes functions and howlibrarians perceive them
surveyandanalysis
Jo AnnKeachPhelan
1984 Texas Woman’sUniversity
Ph.D. diss Study of Use ofFees for Services in Tax-Supported Medium-SizedPublic Libraries
Identifies and evaluatescharacteristics of libraries chargingfees for services.
surveyandanalysis
James M.Kusack
1984 IndianaUniversity
Ph.D. diss Support StaffUnions in UniversityLibraries
Compares unionized with non-unionized libraries.
casestudy
Roland B.Welmaker
1984 University ofMichigan
Ph.D. diss Relationships ofPerceived ManagementSystems and JobSatisfaction of PublicLibrarians
Determines the relationshipsbetween management systems of 9public libraries in the southeasternU.S.
casestudy
Lauren SappWilliams
1984 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss ServiceOrientation of GovtDocuments Librarians inAcademic Libraries of theSoutheastern United States
Analyzes data from questionnaire to298 library staff members.
surveyandanalysis
UlyssesCameron
1984 VirginiaPolytechnicInstitute andState University
Ed.D. diss Application ofHuman Resources Planningto the University of theDistrict of ColumbiaLibrary
Determines the human resourcesneeded for a multimedia library ofmedium size.
casestudy
Edwin L.Holton
1984 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss Use, Cost,Perceived Value and SocialContext ofTelecommunications Toolsin Two-Year CollegeLibraries in southeasternU.S.
Describes cost and use oftelecommunications tools andinvestigates perceived value ofthose tools.
surveyandanalysis
Peter P.Olevnik
1985 SUNY Buffalo Ph.D. diss OrganizationalImplications of FacultyStatus for Librarians in theCollege Library
Examines library’s organizationsand governance structure.
explora-torystudy
Dissertations and other unpublished studies
53
Researcher Date Institution Project Focus TypeBarbaraKasper
1985 IndianaUniversity
Ph.D. diss ComparativeAnalysis of Public LibraryService to Children inIndiana during the 1970s
Assesses children’s services throughsurvey of librarians.
surveyandanalysis
Pamela RaePalmer
1985 Memphis StateUniversity
Ed. D. dissGraduate Education ofAcademic Librarians
Describes graduate education atinstitutions with at least 1,000graduate enrollment in southeasternUnited States.
surveyandanalysis
MohamedFituriAbduljalil
1985 Case WesternReserveUniversity
Ph.D. dissBook Availability and UserSatisfaction in SchoolLibraries
Case study of Shaker HeightsSenior High School and ClevelandHeights High School.
casestudy
Ellen LoweMiller
1986 Old DominionUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Effects ofClassification Systems onManagement and Access inSelected Elementary SchoolLibraries
Examines the extent to whichvariation in a classification systemcorresponds to variation inmanagement and access.
casestudy
Albert A.Lunardi.
1986 University ofSan Francisco
Ed.D. thesisLSCA Title III: PublicSchool Library Participationwithin Cooperative LibraryNetworks
Examines effects of Title III instimulating library participation innetworks.
dataanalysis
Joanne ReedEuster
1986 University ofCalifornia,Berkeley
Ph.D. dissActivities and Effectivenessof the Academic LibraryDirector
Survey of 42 university librarydirectors and investigation of theirrole "in the framework of anenvironmental model developed forthis research."
surveyandanalysis
Sally AnnMcLeodKoenig
1986 VanderbiltUniversity
Ed.D diss A Study of theEvaluation of AcademicLibrary Services inInstitutions Accredited bythe Southern Association ofColleges and Schools
Examines systematic programs ofevaluation.
casestudy
RosemarieRiechel
1986 ColumbiaUniversity
Ph.D. diss. TelephoneReference Activity in LargePublic Libraries
Investigates trends in telephonereference.
surveyandanalysis
BettyDouglasPaulk
1986 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss The Facilitationof Direct Searching ofOnline Services by the EndUser in Academic Libraries
Surveys 487 on-line searchlibrarians about end user searching.
surveyandanalysis
Janice HelenMcCue
1987 ColumbiaUniversity
D.L.S. thesis Performance Compares and analyzes quality ofresults of 42 on-line databasesearches in 21 public libraries in 16states.
casestudy
PopoolaAkanniAwogbami
1987 University ofPittsburgh
Ph.D. diss. Study of 5 U.S.agricultural libraries withimplications for NigerianAgricultural Libraries
Investigates the use of microformsas an efficient method ofinformation transfer.
casestudy
Dissertations and other unpublished studies
54
Researcher Date Institution Project Focus TypeEmma JoyceWhite Mills
1987 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Examination ofProcedures and Practices inthe Selection of BlackMaterials for Children’sCollections of PublicLibraries
Citing interpretations of the ALA’s"Bill of Rights," argues that adisparity may exist between"cultural diversity" and the practicesof librarians in acquiring materials.
explora-torystudy
Santi GopalBasu
1987 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Public LibraryServices to VisuallyDisabled Children
Examines services at subregionallibraries designated by the NationalLibrary Service for the Blind andPhysically Handicapped.
survey
RuthSchwartz
1987 ColumbiaUniversity
D.L.S. thesis Administrationand Organization of Privateand Public MulticampusUniversity Libraries
Evolution of multicampus librariessince World War II.
casestudy
George R.Gaumond
1988 University ofNorth Carolina,Chapel Hill
Ph.D. diss. OrganizationalCharacteristics of UniversityDepartmental Libraries
Studies the relative merits ofcentralized vs departmentallibraries.
casestudy
KwasiSarkodie-Mensah
1988 University ofIllinois, Urbana-Champaign
Ph.D. diss. Foreign Studentsand U.S. AcademicLibraries
Examines two universities in NewOrleans, using questionnaire datafrom students.
casestudy
Jill L. Locke 1988 University ofPittsburgh
Ph.D. diss. Effectiveness ofSummer Reading Programsin Public Libraries
Examines factors related to reachinga higher proportion of childpopulation.
surveyandanalysis
Robert B.Ford, Jr.
1988 RutgersUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Perceptions ofNetworking andOrganizationalInterdependence amongSelected ARL Libraries
surveyandanalysis
Richard P.Bradberry
1988 University ofMichigan
Ph.D. diss. MultitypeUndergraduate LISEducation Programs
Explores the objectives of multitypelibrary programs through a surveyof administrators.
surveyandanalysis
AbigailAyres VanSlyck
1989 University ofCalifornia,Berkeley
Ph.D. diss. CarnegieLibraries andTransformation of AmericanCulture
Analyzes impact of Carnegie giftson changes in philanthropy andculture.
historicalstudy
Linda LouiseLoomisCochrane
1989 Oregon StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Survey ofCollection AnalysisPractices and effects ofautomation in Public andAcademic Libraries
Uses random sample questionnaireto investigate how librarians analyzeuse of collections.
survey
Theodore R.Pfarrer
1989 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Survey ofReference Librarians inFour-Year Colleges andUniversities
Based on a survey of 736 librarians,examines prevalence of CD-ROMtechnology and its futureapplications.
surveyanalysis
Ting MingLai
1990 University ofWisconsin
Ph.D. diss. ComparativeStudy of Use of AcademicLibraries
Compares library use ofundergraduates in the United Statesand Taiwan
casestudy
Dissertations and other unpublished studies
55
Researcher Date Institution Project Focus TypeJoan E.McIntyre
1991 SeattleUniversity
Ph.D. diss. CollectionDevelopment andInstruction in Libraries ofCatholic Colleges andUniversities
Discusses history and theories ofcollection development.
litera-turereview
Paul L.Conway
1991 University ofMichigan
Ph.D. diss. ArchivalPreservation andInformation Sources
Investigates relationship betweenpreservation practice and theperceived availability andusefulness of information sources.
explora-torystudy
Merrill F.Smith
1991 University ofNorth Carolina,Greensboro
Ed. D. diss. Impact ofTechnology on CollectionDevelopment in Academicand Research Libraries inSoutheastern United States
Assesses the impact of technologyon collection development. Datacollected through interviews.
casestudy
Sandra KayeKing Stone
1991 University ofAlabama
Ed. D. diss. Factorsaffecting CD-ROM End-user Instruction in MajorUniversity Libraries
Survey of librarians at research-oriented universities.
surveyandanalysis
Felicia SuilaKimo Lafon
1992 University ofMichigan
Ph.D. diss. ComparativeStudy and Analysis of theLibrary Skills of U.S. andForeign Students at theUniversity of Michigan
Examines whether a singlebibliographic program can serveboth U.S. and foreign students.
casestudy
Nevin D.Raber
1992 IndianaUniversity
Ph.D. diss. The PublicLibrary Inquiry and theSearch for ProfessionalLegitimacy
Examines the PLI, commissionedby the ALA to assess librarianshipin context of the postwar era.
histor-ical study
Majed JalalKhader
1992 Texas Woman’sUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Model ofServices for Public LibrariesServing Arab-AmericanCommunities
Based on a review of the literatureon model-building.
litera-turereviewandmodelbuild-ing
RebeccaReist Martin
1993 USC D.P.A thesis AcademicLibrary Responsiveness toMulticultural Student Needs
Focuses on emerging libraryprograms that address the needs ofmulticultural students.
surveyandanalysis
Robert B.Walker
1994 University ofGeorgia
Ph.D. diss. Georgia’sCarnegie Libraries: History,Conditions, andConservation
Considers Georgia’s 25 Carnegielibraries from a historic preservationperspective.
histor-ical study
Anna HemerPerrault
1994 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Changing PrintResource Base of AcademicLibraries
Compares collection patterns in 72ARL academic libraries for 1985and 1989.
dataanalysis
Terence F.Sebright
1994 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Planning CollegeLibrary Buildings forInformation
Four case studies explore planningand outcomes related to informationtechnology in small-collegelibraries.
casestudy
Jean EllenColeman
1995 RutgersUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Response to aSocio-Educational Need
Examines four case studies of howliteracy can empower.
casestudy
Dissertations and other unpublished studies
56
Researcher Date Institution Project Focus TypeTerry S.Latour
1995 Florida StateUniversity
Ph.D. diss. Library Fund-Raising Activities at U.S.Colleges and Libraries
Investigates degree to whichacademic libraries engage infundraising.
surveyandanalysis
KathrynJosefinaBlackmerReyes
1996 San Jose StateUniversity
MLS thesis.Study of Racial/EthnicLibrarians and Management
Examines racial/ethnic librariansworking in ethnic collections ofuniversity libraries nationwide.
pilotstudy
AlmaDawson
1996 Texas Woman’sUniversity
Ph.D. diss. The AcademicLibrary in Intra-InstitutionalRelationships
Examines proportion of educationaland general expenditure funds ofthree academic libraries, 1983-93.
casestudy
Richard D.Holoczak
1997 RutgersUniversity,Newark
Ph.D. diss. Extractors forDigital Library Objects
Examines ways to create "uniformand automated" mechanisms forbuilding "meaningful andexpressive indexes with whichexpert and novice users caninteract."
explora-torystudy
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information; e=Professional Issues;f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives; j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services;l=Library Models
57
Funded Projects and Research Priorities
The following matrices tabulate the projects for each funding source (identified in Tables IVA and IVB) thatsupported any of the identified Department research priorities (identified in Table II). Total funding for eachprogram is given.
Matrix A: Federally funded programs and research priorities(Listed in alphabetical order by funding sponsor and by focus. Blank cells indicate information is unavailable)
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E S
a b c d e f g h i j k lNCLIS Public Libraries and the
Internet10,000 Charles R.
McClure,John CarloBertot &John C.Beachboard
1 1 1
NCLIS Public Libraries and theInternet
76,965 John CarloBertot, et al
1 1 1
NCLIS Public libraries and theInternet: study results,policy issues, andrecommendations.
67,759 Charles R.McClure,John CarloBertot &Douglas L.Zweizig
1 1
NCLIS Subtotal 154,724 2 3 2NCLIS& NSF
Internet costs and costmodels for publiclibraries; publication.
112,529 Charles R.McClure,John CarloBertot &John C.Beachboard
1 1
NCLIS& NSF
Subtotal 112,529 1 1
NEH Research anddemonstration to producea substantial body ofinformation about theorganizational, financial,and technical issuesinvolved in applyingdigital imagery in thepreservation arena.
363,491 Paul L.Conway
1 1 1
NEH Subtotal 363,491 1 1 1OERI A study of the
dissemination of thePublic Library PlanningProcess
57,143 Verna L.Pungitore
1
OERI Age analysis of publiclibrary collections
78,375 DannyWallace
1
Federally funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
58
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E S
a b c d e f g h i j k lOERI Assessing information on
the Internet: libraryservices for computer-mediated communication
48,675 MartinDillon
1 1
OERI Assessing the informationneeds of rural Americans
59,443 BernardVavrek
1 1 1
OERI Assessing the role of therural public library
58,389 BernardVavrek
1 1 1
OERI Assessment of the publiclibrary’s mission insociety
108,354 GeorgeD’Elia
1
OERI Benefit to rural-areastudents and faculty ofregional informationnetworks
38,128 Patricia J.Cutright
1 1
OERI Book deterioration inOhio libraries
Edward T.O’Neill &Wesley L.Boomgaarden
1 1 1
OERI Cognitive models tofacilitate informationseeking
94,703 CarolKuhlthau
1
OERI Cooperative system forpublic library datacollection, to provide datafor NCES
54,423 Mary JoLynch
1
OERI Determine impact of TitleII-B fellowships on thelibrary and informationscience profession
20,000 MildredLowe
1
OERI Develop comparativeresearch data on twolibrary instructionmethods forundergraduateengineering students
84,545 FrancesBenham,AssociateDean ofLibraries
1 1 1 1
OERI Developing a prototypesystem for intelligentinformation retrieval
63,500 Philip J.Smith andRebeccaDarling
1
OERI Development and study ofan intelligent referenceinformation system (ISIS)
99,852 Robin N.Downes,UniversityLibrary
1 1 1
Federally funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
59
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E S
a b c d e f g h i j k lOERI Development of an
"electronic textbook" inhuman physiology
200,287 Naomi C.Broering,BiomedicalInformationResourcesCenter
1 1
OERI Economics of publiclibraries and libraryfunding
57,100 Jane B.Robbins,DouglasZweizig
1 1
OERI Embracing the tiger:learning from publiclibrary literacy programs
62,949 Andrew J.Seager
1 1 1
OERI Evaluate use of faxcopiers or scanners in lieuof sending actual items orphotocopies
175,746 Robert J.Bertholf
1 1
OERI Evaluating use of newtechnology
101,622 Jack O’Bar,UniversityLibrary
1 1
OERI Evaluation of adult libraryliteracy programs
52,969 DouglasZweizig
1
OERI Facilitating informationseeking through cognitivemodeling of the searchprocess
93,553 CarolKuhlthau
1 1
OERI Factors influencing theoutcome of challenges tomaterials in middle,junior, and high schoollibraries
65,750 DianeHopkins
1 1 1 1 1
OERI Hypermedia and researchmethodology
55,500 EleanorLangstaff
1 1
OERI Hypermedia project toprovide information infour county librarysystems
80,000 1 1 1 1 1 1
OERI Identifying researchableissues to help librariansattain or maintainleadership positions in aninformation society
348,966 Kate Joyceand MaryKahn
1
OERI Institute to review trendsin key subjects related tourban libraries [grantmentioned in monograph]
MohammedAman andDonaldSager
1 1
Federally funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
60
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E S
a b c d e f g h i j k lOERI Local implementation of
the public libraryplanning and role settingprocess
57,187 VernaPungitore
1 1
OERI Medical literature as asource of new knowledge
41,248 Ron R.Swanson
1
OERI Nature and improvementof librarian-userinteraction and on-linesearching for informationdelivery in libraries
84,823 TefkoSaracevic
1 1 1
OERI Output measures forchildren’s services inpublic libraries
42,014 VirginiaWalter
1
OERI Pilot computer-basedtraining modules for stafftraining libraries
66,901 Pauline S.Bayne,MusicLibrary
1 1
OERI Program to teach andguide students in usingon-line public catalog andcomputerized and printreference sources
117,558 VirginiaTiefel
1 1 1 1
OERI Providing principles,guidelines, and desirablefeatures for a 3rd-generation on-line publicaccess catalog
106,987 NicholasBelkin andTefkoSaracevic
1 1 1 1
OERI Public libraryeffectiveness: theory,measures, anddeterminants
Nancy A.Van House
1 1
OERI Public library planningprocess in smallerlibraries.
45,700 VernaPungitoreand CaroleNowicke
1
OERI Purchase of hardware andresearch anddemonstration oftechnical requirements fora consortium
89,438 Patricia M.Kelly,UniversityLibrary
1
OERI Relationship betweenlength of loan period andcirculation in publiclibraries
25,000 SusanNelson andHerbertGoldhor
1 1
Federally funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
61
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E S
a b c d e f g h i j k lOERI Research to measure
effects of a three-collegeautomation project onusers, staff, andinstitutions
102,643 Thomas A.Childers andBelver C.Griffith
1 1
OERI Roles of school,academic, special, andcommunity libraries inproviding viewtextinformation services
60,000 MaryDeweaver
1
OERI Status of libraries inliteracy education
148,037 DouglasZweizig etal.
1
OERI Testing a new design forsubject access to on-linecatalogues
KarenDrabenstott
1 1
OERI The impact of schoollibrary media centers onacademic achievement
66,664 Keith CurryLance
1 1
OERI The Public LibraryEffectiveness Study
132,000 ThomasChilders andNancy VanHouse
1 1
OERI The use of children’smaterials in school andpublic libraries
57,833 KathleenGarland
1
OERI To determine if hands-onexercises improve abilityto use computer-basedresearch tools
85,677 MarvinWiggins
1 1
OERI Update of, andcomparison with, a 1971survey of library servicesto the aging
22,674 Betty J.Turock
1
OERI Subtotal 3,512,356 22 12 6 2 7 0 6 15 0 2 18 1U.S.Congress
Adult literacy and newtechnologies: tools for alifetime.
Office ofTechnologyAssessment
1
GRAND TOTAL $4,143,100 22 12 7 5 7 0 9 15 1 3 22 1
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information; e=Professional Issues;f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives; j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services;l=Library Models
62
Matrix B: Privately funded programs and research priorities(Listed in alphabetical order by funding sponsor and focus. Blank cells indicate information is unavailable)
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Comprehensive evaluationmethodology for ongoingactivities in creatingdigital library
700,000 1 1 1 1 1 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Economics of electroniclibrary of the future
210,000 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Electronic journals in fieldof religious studies1995
250,000 1 1 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Research project oneconomics of electroniclibrary of the future
290,000 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Study of interlibrary loan 160,000 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
University Libraries andScholarly Communication
0 AnthonyCummingset al.
1 1 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Journal Storage Project, tomake back issues or coreperiodicals available tofaculty and students indigital format
700,000 1 1 1 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Journal Storage Projecttest sites
75,000 1 1 1 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Research Libraries Project 50,000 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Research Libraries Project 25,000 1
Andrew W.MellonFndtn.
Scholarly Communicationand technology
0 RichardEkman
1 1 1
AndrewW. MellonFndtn.
Subtotal 2,460,000 8 1 1 2 0 0 1 6 2 2 4 1
Assoc.CollegeResearchLibraries &Con-sultingPsycholo-gists Press
Shattering our stereotype:librarians’ new image
15,000 Mary JaneScherdin
1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
63
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
BentonFndtn.
Support of ACLU’s workon privacy implications ofnew computer andcommunicationtechnologies
25,000 1 1
BentonFndtn.
Telecommunication needsof nonprofits in the TwinCities area; resourcedirectory; seminars onnew technologies
15,000 1 1 1 1
BentonFndtn.
Subtotal 40,000 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
Camilleand HenryDreyfusFndtn.
Cost-effectiveness ofdistributive access modelof electronic library aspart of Fndtn.’s PlanningGrants for ChemicalInformatics
15,000 1
CarnegieCorporation of NewYork
Implications of technologydevelopments for highereducation and scholarlycommunication
180,000 1 1 1 1
CLR Academic administrators’views on the role ofcollege libraries
1,830 LarryHardesty &DavidKasser
1
CLR Analytical framework andbaseline for networkedinformation resources andservices
25,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
CLR Application of behavioralresearch methodology toenvironmental designproblems in libraries
2,587 1 1 1
CLR Attitudes of municipal andcounty officials towardpublic libraries
12,000 1 1
CLR Benchmarking pilotproject on interlibrary loan
17,540 Intern.SystemsServicesCorp. andJack A.Wiggins
1 1 1
CLR Comparison of journal useto reported relative value,college discipline, andsubscription cost
3,000 1
CLR Comparison of on-line andmanual search capabilitiesof students
1,000 1 1 1 1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
64
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
CLR Conference on publiclibrary effectiveness
16,760 1
CLR Cost and beneficialimpacts of libraryfunctions
97,612 PaulKantor,JoannaD’Esposito-Wachtmann, TefkoSaracevic
1
CLR Cost-benefits of accesscompared to ownershipcosts for expensiveresearch journals
54,012 Eleanor A.Gossen andSuzanneIrving
1 1 1
CLR Costs of consortiummembership
23,500 1
CLR Coverage of library andinformation science inbibliographic databases
2,935 1
CLR Decision-making processfor collection developmentin libraries
6,359 1
CLR Determining factorsleading Earlham Collegegraduates to enter libraryschools
1,000 1
CLR Dewey DecimalClassification as an on-line searching tool forsubject access
94,350 1 1 1 1
CLR Economic analysis ofscholarly periodical costs
27,800 1
CLR Editing efficiency of anon-line bibliographicinformation system
2,350 1 1 1
CLR Effectiveness ofaffirmative actionguidelines on recruitmentand promotion of minoritylibrarians
2,879 1
CLR Effects of human factorson a library computerliteracy program
3,000 1
CLR Effects of integratinginformation technology onjob classification andcompensation systems
18,560 1
CLR Effects of publishedreviews on librarypurchasing decisions
2,965 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
65
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
CLR Environmental factors inprofessional developmentactivities: does type ofacademic libraryaffiliation make adifference?
2,936 W. MichaelHavenerand PhilipWorrell
1
CLR Functionality of on-linecatalogs
11,000 Charles R.Hildreth
1 1 1 1 1
CLR Humanists’ use oflibraries
23,000 1 1
CLR Impact of interdisciplinaryresearch on librarycollection-building
3,000 1 1 1 1
CLR Impact of technologicalchanges on libraryfunctional units
3,000 1 1 1 1
CLR Impact of transaction feeson interlibrary loan
2,960 James H.Sweetland& DarleneE. Weigand
1 1 1
CLR Information locatorsystem prototype
24,880 1 1 1
CLR Information needs ofphilosophers
34,625 Mary EllenSievert
1 1 1
CLR Information needs ofpublic affairs scholars
2,996 1 1 1 1
CLR Information seekingbehavior of scientists
5,150 1 1 1
CLR Information-seekingpatterns of facultymembers and their use ofan on-line system
3,518 IngridHsieh-Yee
1 1 1 1
CLR Information-seekingprocess amongpopulation-studiesresearchers
4,000 1 1 1 1
CLR Interlibrary loan coststudy
10,000 1
CLR Knowledge management:expanding the scholarlyrole of research libraries
182,808 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
CLR Long-range planning forlibraries and informationresources in researchuniversities
400,000 1
CLR Measuring public servicesimpact of an on-linecatalog
19,200 Louise S.Sherby
1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
66
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
CLR Microcomputer-baseddigital imaging as atechnique for preservinglibrary materials
2,500 1 1
CLR Online catalog evaluationproject
32,403 Ray R.Larson
1 1 1 1
CLR Perceived values ofadvanced subject degrees
3,000 MaryGrosch &TerryWeech
1
CLR Price discrimination ofeconomics journals
3,109 George A.Chressanthus & JuneD.Chressanthus
1
CLR Relationship betweenbibliographic access tostored materials andfaculty attitude and use
31,747 1 1 1 1
CLR Relationships betweenlibrary schools and theirinstitutions’ libraries
3,000 MarianneCooper &ShoshonaKaufmann
1
CLR Role of fees in supportinglibrary and informationservices
10,000 1 1 1
CLR Roles of informationmanagers in U.S.universities
10,990 1
CLR Scope and impact ofbookmobile service in theU.S.
3,000 Bert R.Boyce &Judith I.Boyce
1 1 1
CLR Search patterns of in-library on-line catalogusers
4,083 1 1 1 1 1 1
CLR Statistical reliability ofindicators in the RLGconspectus for music
3,000 1
CLR Study of searchingstrategies on CD-ROM
32,512 1 1 1
CLR Test of measures andcorrelates of academiclibrary performance
3,000 1 1
CLR The RLG conspectus as acollection managementtool
10,000 1 1 1 1
CLR Time management inacademic libraries
2,773 1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
67
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
CLR To study users of full-textdatabases
2,988 CarolTenopir,DianeNahl-Jakobovits,Dara LeeHoward
1 1 1
CLR Unobtrusive testing ofreference service in adivisional academiclibrary
1,800 CherylElzy, AlanNourie,F.W.Lancaster
1
CLR Use of MARC formats forcataloging art objects
20,000 1 1 1 1
CLR User persistence inscanning LCS postings
1,200 Stephen E.Wiberley,Jr., et al
1 1 1
CLR User success with an on-line catalog
15,736 Nancy C.Kranich, etal
1 1
CLR Users’ interest in digitizedimages
2,964 1 1
CLR Users’ persistence inscanning postings in anon-line public accesscatalog
5,330 Stephen E.Wiberley,Jr., et al
1 1 1
CLR Improving subjectsearching in onlinecatalogs
KarenMarkeyDrabenstott& DianeVizine-Goetz
1 1 1
CLR Advanced retrievalmethods for onlinecatalogs
Edward A.Fox
1 1 1
CLR User persistence inscanning LCS postings
1200 Stephen E.Wiberley etal.
1 1
CLR Subtotal 1,355,247 37 24 9 9 9 0 6 21 4 14 26 1FairfaxCountyPublicLibrary
Comparative assessmentof patrons’ uses andevaluations across publiclibraries within a system: areplication
GeorgeD’Elia andElanor JoRodger
1 1
FordFndtn.
Kinds of informationavailable on neighborhooddevelopment for use bycitizens and publicofficials
40,000 1 1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
68
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
H.W.WilsonFndtn.
Concerns aboutfundraising by publicinstitutions: publiclibraries as a case study
37,950 Thomas A.Jeavons
1 1
H.W.WilsonFndtn.
The national libraryreference survey
25,000 John W.Head
1 1
H.W.WilsonFndtn.
Subtotal 62,950 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
HenryLuceFndtn.
New electronic virtuallibrary system, incollaboration withlibraries of HarvardUniversity and YaleUniversity
300,000 1 1 1 1 1
IllinoisStateLibrary
Survey of children’slibrarians in Illinois publiclibraries
LorienneRoy
1
IndianaUniversitySchool ofLibraryand Infor-mationScience
Perceptions of change andpublic library directors inIndiana: an exploratorystudy
650 Verna L.Pungitore
1
J.M.KaplanFndtn.,O’Reillyand Assoc-iates
Project GAIN: Connectingrural public libraries to theInternet [in New YorkState]
65,000 Charles R.McClure etal.
1 1 1 1
John andJamesKnightFndtn.
Project at branchesserving disadvantagedneighborhoods
100,000 1
Librariesfor theFuture
Private philanthropicfunding of public libraries
LindaKravitz etal.
1
LillyEndow-ment
Technologicaldevelopment intheological libraries
133,650 1 1 1
MardagFndtn.
Library Equity andExcellence Project,designed to support libraryimprovement and schoolreform in elementaryschool libraries in SaintPaul
105,000 1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
69
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
MillbrookPress, Inc.
The Millbrook Report:the changing role of theschool library
1 1 1 1
NathanCummngsFndtn.
Forums to assess societalimpact of emerginginternational informationinfrastructure
10,000 1 1
OCLC Developing controlmechanisms forintellectual access fordiscipline-based libraries
10,000 Marcia LeiZent
1 1 1 1 1 1
OCLC Effect of linkage structureon retrieval performanceand user response in ahypertext-based biblio-graphic retrieval system
5,000 AlexandraDimitroff& DietmarWolfram
1 1 1 1 1
OCLC Empirical test of gophersearching using threeorganizational schemes
10,000 C. OliviaFrost &JosephJanes
1 1 1 1 1
OCLC Enhancing a new designfor subject access to on-line catalogues
10,000 KarenDrabenstott
1 1 1 1 1
OCLC Public libraries and theINTERNET/NREN, toexplore roles for thepublic library in thenetworked environment
10,000 Charles R.McClure etal.
1 1 1
OCLC Impact of scholarlyjournals on scholarlycommunication: areference and citationstudy
3,000-10,000
StephenP.Harter
1
OCLC An experimental study ongraphical tables ofcontents
3,000-10,000
Xia Lin 1
OCLC Analyzing the viability ofusing peer group holdingsas an evaluation tool forpublic library adult fiction
3,000-10,000
James H.Sweetland& Judith J.Senkevitch
1 1 1
OCLC A relational thesaurus:modeling semanticrelationships using frames
3,000-10,000
RebeccaGreen
1 1 1
OCLC Automatic subjectassignment via theScorpion System; buildingtools for automatic subjectrecognition based on well-known schemes
Keith E.Shafer
1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
70
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
OCLC Characteristics of articlesrequested through OCLCinterlibrary loan
Chandra G.Prabha
1 1 1
OCLC Creating DTDs via theGB-Engine and Fred
Keith E.Shafer
1 1 1
OCLC Effect of linkage structureon retrieval performanceand user response in ahypertext-basedbibliographic system
5,000 AlexandraDimitroff& DietmarWolfram
1 1 1 1
OCLC Electronic texts andtraditional indexes: astudy of applicability andperformance
3,000-10,000
ElizabethD. Liddy
1 1 1
OCLC Measuring diversity inpublic library collections
3,000-10,000
JudithSerebnick& FrankQuinn
1 1 1
OCLC Document ranking usingsignature files
Dik LunLee
1 1 1 1
OCLC Estimating interlibraryloan volume in 1993;includes public libraries
Chandra G.Prabha
1 1 1 1
OCLC Experimental linguisticindexing for informationretrieval (ELIXIR)
C. JeanGodby &Bradley C.Watson
1 1 1 1
OCLC Modeling user'spreferences for documentdelivery
Mark T.Kinnucan
1 1 1 1 1
OCLC Automatic hierarchicalorganization of phrasesusing machine-readabledictionary information
3,000-10,000
Amy J.Warner
1 1 1 1
OCLC Determining the contentof machine-readablesubdivision records
3,000-10,000
KarenMarkeyDrabenstott
1 1 1 1
OCLC Expert system interface toLibrary of Congresssubject headings
3,000-10,000
PadminiSrinivasan
1 1 1
OCLC Scholars' access to thedocuments they cite
3,000-10,000
KeithSwigger
1 1 1 1
OCLC Obsolete Library ofCongress Subject headings
Roy Chenget al.
1 1 1
OCLC Record matching forauthority control
Edward T.O'Neill
1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
71
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
OCLC Public libraries and theINTERNET/NREN, toexplore roles for thepublic library in thenetworked environment
10,000 Charles R.McClure etal.
1 1 1 1 1 1
OCLC General structure of aknowledge base forAnglo-Americancataloging rules
3,000-10,000
Ling HweyJeng
1 1 1
OCLC Identifying barriers toeffective subject access inlibrary catalogs
3,000-10,000
F.W.Lancaster
1 1 1 1
OCLC Investigating the structureof LCC and LCSH:developing a knowledgebase
3,000-10,000
DagobertSoergel
1 1
OCLC Toward integration ofonline resources
3,000-10,000
Linda C.Smith et al.
1 1 1 1 1 1
OCLC The interlibrary loanprocess; data from 1public and 1 academiclibrary
Chanrda G.Prabha
1 1 1 1
OCLC Enhancing topicalsearching usingclassification clustering
3,000-10,000
Ray R.Larson
1 1 1 1
OCLC Relationship betweenlibrary holdings andselection sources
3,000-10,000
JudithSerebnick
1 1 1 1
OCLC Automated documentarchitecture processingand tagging (ADAPT)
Stuart L.Weibel
1 1 1
OCLC Bibliographic control anddocument architecture inhypermedia databases
RolandHjerppe
1 1 1
OCLC Cataloger's assistant;prototype system forsupporting the catalogingfunction
DianeVizine-Goetz
1 1 1 1
OCLC Cataloging time andworkflow studies; in 1public and 3 academiclibraries
Chandra G.Prabha
1 1
OCLC Design of interfaces anddatabases for electronicmedia (DIADEM)
Martha J.Lindeman
1 1 1 1
OCLC Document imageprocessing toolbox
John C.Handley
1
OCLC Enhanced bibliographicretrieval
MartinDillon
1 1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
72
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
OCLC The Experimental LibrarySystem (XLS)
Thomas B.Hickey
1
OCLC Analytical study ofbibliographic data on atitle page
3,000-10,000
BillieGraceHerring
1 1 1
OCLC Applying the revisedMARC format for three-dimensional objects inmuseums
3,000-10,000
Esther G.Bierbaum
1 1 1
OCLC Evaluating subjectcollections
3,000-10,000
Howard D.White
1
OCLC Measurement of subjectscatter in thesuperintendent ofdocuments classification
3,000-10,000
Lee Shiflett 1 1 1
OCLC Subject representations inmonographic records
3,000-10,000
PamelaReekesMcKirdy
1 1 1
OCLC Automated documentstructure analysis
Stuart L.Weibel
1 1 1
OCLC Clustering equivalentbibliographic records
ElaineSvevonius
1 1 1
OCLC Collection analysis;examines monographicacquisitions of selectedARL members
Edward T.O'Neill
1 1 1
OCLC Connectionist models ofcomputation: theirpotential in informationsystems
Stuart T.Weibel
1 1 1
OCLC Duplicate detection andthe "species problem"
John A.Bunge
1 1 1
OCLC Managing large retrievals Chandra G.Prabha
1 1 1
OCLC Scholars cross-referencesystem; a way ofcollecting, enhancing, andusing bibliographicrelationships not manifestin text per se
Paul B.Kantor
1 1 1 1
OCLC Comparativeclassification; investigatesinterdisciplinary nature ofclassificatin theory andmethod
Francis L.Miksa
1 1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
73
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
OCLC Library of Congress ClassM subset: music; toidentify methods ofcorrecting records andcreate a prototypedatabase
Jeanette M.Drone
1 1 1 1
OCLC Online Union Catalogsubsetting analysis
John A.Bunge
1 1 1 1
OCLC Assessing access toalternative presspublications: women'spress titles in the OCLConline Union Catalog
SuzanneHildenbrand
1 1 1 1
OCLC Dynamics of the OCLConline Union Catalog
DeboraShaw
1 1 1 1
OCLC Holdings as a measure ofjournal value
Danny P.Wallace
1 1 1 1 1
OCLC Studies in automaticcataloging
ElaineSvenonius
1 1
OCLC Variations in subjectcataloging in non-Libraryof Congress catalogingrecords
Lois MaiChan
1 1
OCLC Advanced interface designfor library retrievalsystems
MartinDillon
1 1
OCLC Automated title pagecatalogiing
StuartWeibel
1 1
OCLC Class dispersion betweenthe Library of Congressclassification and theDewey Decimalclassification
DianeVizine-Goetz
1 1
OCLC CONSER abstracting andindexing title overlap
John E.Tolle
1 1
OCLC Display formats; todevelop experimentalmethods for evaluatinghuman-computerinterfaces and refineevaluation techniques
John E.Tolle
1 1
OCLC Graph-Text; to developprototype electronicdocument delivery system
ThomasHickey
1 1 1
OCLC Nonfiction book use bypublic library users
ChandraPrabha
1 1
OCLC OCLC CD-ROM retrievalsystem
TerryNoreault
1 1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
74
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
OCLC OCLC database useanalysis: determination ofan appropriate databasesubset for cataloging onthe OCLC M300Workstation
Brigitte L.Kenney
1 1 1
OCLC,CLR,Univ.Michigan
Increasing theAccessibility of Library ofCongress subject headingsin online bibliographicsystems
KarenMarkey etal.
1 1 1
OCLC Subtotal 64 51 6 2 1 0 2 59 0 7 37
3
Old GoldSummerFellow-ship,UniversityIowa
Naive vs sophisticatedmethods of forecastingpublic library circulations
TerrenceA. Brooks
1 1
PLA Information about libraryprograms servingmulticultural and/ormultilingual populations
1,000 LeeOlivier,RobertBelvin,SylviaManoogian
1 1 1
PolicyResearchInstitute,UniversityTexasAustin
AIDS information servicesin U.S. public libraries:national comparison ofattitudes
W.BernardLukenbill
1 1
RutgersUniversityResearchCouncil
Organization factors inmultitype librarynetworking: a national testof a model
Betty J.Turock
1 1 1
St. Law-rence Uni-versityLibrary
Union-nonunion wagedifferentials in the publiclibrary
500 Mary F.Rosenthal
1
UniversityIllinois,Urbana-Cham-paign
Gender differences inattitudes toward usingcomputers in libraries: anexploratory study
1,600 Frances F.Jacobson
1 1
UniversityIllinois,Urbana-Cham-paign
Logical reasoning andretrieval performance
500 BryceAllen
1 1
Privately funded programs and research priorities
a=Information Service; b=Information Use; c=Information Planning; d=Economics of Information;e=Professional Issues; f=Intellectual freedom; g=Policy Issues; h=Infor-mation Access; i=Archives;j=Organizing Materials; k=Public Services; l=Library Models
75
Sponsor Focus Funding P.I. P R I O R I T I E Sa b c d e f g h I j k l
UniversityIllinois,Urbana-Cham-paign
2,100 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
UniversityWiscon-sin, Osh-kosh
Development andevaluation of a measure oflibrary automation
2,000 Verna L.Pungitore
1 1 1 1 1
UniversityWisconsinInstitute onRace andEthnicity&UniversityWisconsinGraduateSchool
Toward a conceptualmodel of factorsinfluencing the outcomeof challenges to librarymaterials in schoolsettings
DianneMcAfeeHopkins
1 1 1 1 1 1
W.K.KelloggFndtn.
Buildings, books, andbytes: libraries andcommunities in the digitalage; report on public’sopinion of library leaders’vision of the future
100,000 1 1 1 1
W.K.KelloggFndtn.
Institutional and policyissues in development ofDigital Library
650,000 1
W.K.KelloggFndtn.
750,000 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0
GRAND TOTAL 124 85 19 15 15 1 19 95 7 26 86 6
76