Department of Transportation Final Recommendation of SR-710 Pasadena Working Group Regarding...

Department of Transportation

Final Recommendation ofSR-710 Pasadena Working Group Regarding Proposed Alternatives

for SR-710 North Project

Council MeetingApril 13, 2015


2

Recommendation

1. Support the recommendation of the SR-710 Pasadena Working Group; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to send a letter to Caltrans and the Mayor to send a letter to the Board of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) on behalf of the City of Pasadena expressing such support; and

3. Authorize City staff to coordinate with adjacent communities on efforts in support of advancing the elements of the Working Group’s recommended alternative.


3


4

Pasadena History

1967 – City executes freeway agreement with State for SR 7 alignment in Pasadena

2001 – Measure A adopted by voter referendumThe policy of the City of Pasadena favors completion of the 710 Freeway between the I-210 Freeway and the I-10 Freeway and cannot be changed without a vote of the people. Measure A is still effective.

2012 – City Legal Opinion that Measure A prohibits the City from taking a position against completion of Freeway proposals that would connect the I-10 and I-210 Freeways.

2014 – Pasadena Working Group formed to develop Pasadena Preferred Alternative


5

History

• March 6, 2015 – Caltrans released the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (DEIR/EIS) prepared by Metro for the SR-710 North Study

• Comments received until July 6, 2015

• A Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the SR-710 corridor will be included in the Final EIR/EIS>“Local” means the region, not Pasadena


6

Environmental Process Timeline

Sou

rce

: S

R-7

10

Nor

th S

tud

y D

EIR

/EIS

, Ca

ltran

s/M

etr

o,

Ma

rch

20

15


7

DEIR/DEIS Public Comment

• Tuesday, April 14, 2015Pasadena Convention Center300 East Green StreetPasadena, CA 91101

• Wednesday, May 6, 2015 La Canada High School Auditorium – Building B4463 Oak Grove drive, La Canada, 91011

• Thursday, May 7, 2015Los Angeles Christian Presbyterian Church - Multi-Purpose Room 2241 N. Eastern Avenue, Los Angeles, 90032

• Map Viewing (all locations)

>5:00 PM – 6:00 PM• Public Hearing (all

locations)

>6:00 PM – 9:00 PM

http://www.metro.net/projects/sr-710-conversations/





8

Review of the DEIR/DEIS

• Detailed review of the DEIR/DEIS underway>Specialized consultants for transportation,

CEQA legal, air quality/noise, geology/hydrology Shared with 5 City Alliance

>Staff review of all chapters for Pasadena-specific outcomes and concerns

>Initial review findings expected by April/May 2015

>Presentation of comments to Council in June 2015 Assemble into letter format for the Mayor Submit comments prior to July 6, 2015

deadline


9

Purpose (from DEIR/DEIS)

> Improve efficiency of the existing regional freeway and transit networks.

> Reduce congestion on local arterials adversely affected due to regional traffic volumes

> Minimize environmental impacts related to mobile sources

• Effectively and efficiently accommodate regional and local north-south travel demands in the study area of the western San Gabriel Valley and east/northeast Los Angeles


10

DEIR/DEIS Alternatives

• No Build (Includes projects in the 2009 LRTP)• TSM/TDM

>2009 LRTP plus enhanced spot fixes and expanded existing transit service

• BRT>TSM/TDM plus BRT on Atlantic/Fair Oaks

• LRT>TSM/TDM plus LRT generally under Fair Oaks

• Freeway Tunnel>Reduced TSM/TDM plus one or two tunnels


11

No Build (2009 LRTP)S

ourc

e:

SR

-71

0 N

orth

Stu

dy

DE

IR/E

IS, C

altr

ans/

Me

tro

, M

arc

h 2

01

5


12

Active Transportation Enhanced Transit Service

TSM/TDM Alternative

Source: SR-710 North Study DEIR/EIS, Caltrans/Metro, March 2015


13

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

Intersection/Local Street improvements

TSM/TDM Alternative

Source: SR-710 North Study DEIR/EIS, Caltrans/Metro, March 2015• $105 million (2014 dollars)


14

BRT Alternative (Incl. TSM/TDM)

Sou

rce

: S

R-7

10

Nor

th S

tud

y D

EIR

/EIS

, Ca

ltran

s/M

etr

o,

Ma

rch

20

15

• Includes bus feeder routes > New route in Pasadena

would connect to El Monte Bus Station via Colorado and Rosemead

• $241 million (2014 dollars)


15

LRT Alternative (Incl. TSM/TDM)

• Underground station> Near Fillmore Gold Line

• Includes bus feeder routes > New route in Pasadena

would connect El Monte Bus Station to the Fillmore Station via Colorado and Rosemead

• $2,420 million (2014 dollars)

Sou

rce

: S

R-7

10

Nor

th S

tud

y D

EIR

/EIS

, Ca

ltran

s/M

etr

o,

Ma

rch

20

15


Freeway Tunnel Alternative

• Analyzed with and without trucks and with and without tolls

• $5,650 million (2014 dollars)

>Dual-bore 8-Lane• $3,150 million (2014

dollars) >Single-bore 4-Lane

• Costs include about half of TSM/TDM Alternative> $50 million (2014 dollars)

16

Sou

rce

: S

R-7

10

Nor

th S

tud

y D

EIR

/EIS

, Ca

ltran

s/M

etr

o,

Ma

rch

20

15


17

PWG PRESENTATION

David GrannisJennifer Higginbotham


18

Working Group Charge• Identify the best

project alternative for Pasadena, in particular recognizing that much of the impact associated with the alternatives proposed in the Draft EIR/EIS will have a profound impact on the future of Pasadena

Working Group Members• Stephen Acker• Geoffrey Baum• Joel Bryant• Alan Clelland• Sarah Gavit• David Grannis• Jennifer Higginbotham

Pasadena Working Group


19

PWG Objectives


20

PWG Objectives

• Meet long-term mobility needs consistent with Pasadena’s history and character

• A priority on moving people, rather than vehicles

• Incorporate next generation technology for transportation

• Improve safety

• Ensure consistency with Pasadena's General Plan

• Enhance travel options for underserved communities

• Minimize environmental impacts

• Reduce surface street traffic

• Provide transportation choices to the public


21

PWG's Recommendation – 1

• Multi-modal Alternative>Light Rail Transit (LRT)>Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)/Expanded Bus Service>Mobility Hubs>Bicycle Network Enhancements >Local Street Network Enhancements

• Graphic of Recommended Alternative

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=zHLI_QT_8inE.ks91mYiHKsJM


22

PWG's Recommendation – 2

• Promote coordination and connectivity with neighboring and distant communities in the north-south corridor


23

Recommendation

1. Support the recommendation of the SR-710 Pasadena Working Group; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to send a letter to Caltrans and the Mayor to send a letter to the Board of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) on behalf of the City of Pasadena expressing such support; and

3. Authorize City staff to coordinate with adjacent communities on efforts in support of advancing the elements of the Working Group’s recommended alternative.

Department of Transportation Final Recommendation of SR-710 Pasadena Working Group Regarding...

Documents

Transcript of Department of Transportation Final Recommendation of SR-710 Pasadena Working Group Regarding...