Department of the Environment A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn? –...
-
Upload
lora-flowers -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Department of the Environment A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn? –...
Department of the Environment
A History of Power Plant Controlsin Maryland
What Did We Learn? – Where do We go Next?
Part 1 – Background and Historical Emission ReductionsStakeholder Meeting # 1 - 2013 Power Plant Regulations
Tad Aburn, MDE – October 21, 2013
Topics Covered• Part 1 – Background and the good news
– Maryland’s air quality– Reducing emissions from power plants
• Acid Rain Program• Reasonably Available Control Technology for
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx RACT)• Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) NOx Budget
Program• EPA NOx SIP Call• Healthy Air Act• More …
– Next Round of power plant controls• New ozone standard• New Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) standard
• Part 2 – NOx - Unit-by-unit analyses and current MDE thinking on new emission limits
• Part 3 – SO2 - Unit-by-unit analyses and current MDE thinking on new emission limits
Maryland’s Air Quality• Ground level ozone has improved
dramatically but we still monitor levels above the health based standard
• Fine particle levels are currently below attainment levels– New and future ozone and fine particle
standards will continue to push Maryland to seek more emission reductions
• Maryland is the fourth most vulnerable state to sea level rise– One of the major impacts from climate change
• Mercury and other air toxics continue to be a major issue
• Contribution of air pollution sources to nitrogen deposition in the Chesapeake Bay is a major issue
•p. 4
15.8 15.914.5
11.7 11.3
17.1
11.1
12.915.616.215.9
0
4
8
12
16
20
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Ann
ual P
M2.
5 (u
g/m
3 )
Annual Fine Particulate41 41 39
35
2930
42 4137
33 29
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Dai
ly P
M2.
5 (u
g/m
3 )
0
10
20
30
40
50Daily Fine Particulate
152 147 143 137 126 121 119119
0
40
80
120
160
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
1-H
our
Ozo
ne (
ppb)
1-Hour Ozone 8-Hour Ozone
107 107 10494 93 91 89 93
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
8-H
our
Ozo
ne (
ppb)
0
40
80
120
Progress in Cleaning Maryland’s Air
1996 Acid Rain Provisions of the CAA• Established in 1996 under Title IV of
CAA• Cap and trade program to reduce
acid rain• Two phases, 1996 and 2000
– SO2 and NOx
• SO2 – 9% reduction between 2000 and 2002– 41% between 1980 and 2002
• NOx– 13% reduction between 2000 and 2002– 33% between 1990 and 2002
Reasonably Available Control Technology• … or RACT• 1995 and 2006 update• Drove investment in a host of combustion
related modifications– Low NOx Burners– Separated Overfire Air – More
• Did not drive post combustion controls like – Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology – Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR)
technology• Resulted in small but meaningful NOx
reductions in Maryland• Issue – RACT applies statewide in
Maryland – Only applies in nonattainment areas in most
upwind states
OTC NOx Budget Program• Regional cap and trade effort between 13
states in the OTC – 1999 to 2002• Established annual and ozone season caps
− Market based concepts− Allowed banking and trading
• Regional summertime NOx caps for OTC states:
− 219,000 tons in 1999− 143,000 tons in 2003 (less than half of
the 1990 baseline emission level of 490,000 tons)
• Replaced by the NOx SIP Call (a larger NOx Budget Trading Program) in 2003/2004
• Major Issue– States upwind of Maryland not included
NOx SIP Call• 20-State cap and trade program to
reduce NOx• 1998 … EPA finalized rule• Implemented by EPA “calling in” SIPs
(State Implementation Plans) for 20 states and requiring NOx reductions– Had a model rule that states could
opt into• Patterned after OTC NOx Budget
Program• Designed to reduce regional NOx 28%
from 1996 emissions levels by 2007• A major success story for reducing
transport• Major issue – Still allowed
unconstrained trading
Why the NOx SIP Call Worked?
2 1 25
18
23
77
50
13
8
30
15
62 2
2 3 5 10
28
51
128
178191
199
229
244250 252 254
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1995 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
0
50
100
150
200
250Number of Units
Cumulative Total Units
1.92
1.22
0.59 0.520.38
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1990 2000 2005 2008 2009
Year
Ozo
ne
Sea
son
NO
X (
mil
lio
n t
on
s) .
1.92
1.22
0.59 0.520.38
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1990 2000 2005 2008 2009
Year
Ozo
ne
Sea
son
NO
X (
mil
lio
n t
on
s) .
The classic ozone transport story– Incoming ozone levels (as
high as 80 ppb) collect in an elevated reservoir over night
– Real world programs like the NOx SIP call have shown that
• Adding regional controls• Results in regional NOx
emission reductions …• Which lead to reduced
ozone in the elevated reservoir …
• Which lead to lower ozone at ground level and public health protection!
The classic ozone transport story– Incoming ozone levels (as
high as 80 ppb) collect in an elevated reservoir over night
– Real world programs like the NOx SIP call have shown that
• Adding regional controls• Results in regional NOx
emission reductions …• Which lead to reduced
ozone in the elevated reservoir …
• Which lead to lower ozone at ground level and public health protection!
80 ppb at 2
000 ft.
at 6 a.m
.
Morning Elevated Reservoir of Ozone Above the OTR
Huge Investment in SCRs in 2003 and
2004
Regional NOx Emissions Drop
Dramatically in 2004
Ozone Levels in the Elevated Reservoir
Reduced by 25% after 2004
Ground Level Ozone Drops Dramatically in the Same Time
FrameMaryland's 8-Hour Ozone Design Value per Year
60
80
100
120
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Year
8-Ho
ur O
zone
Des
ign
Valu
e (p
pb)
8-Hour Ozone Design Value (ppb) 8-Hour Ozone Standard (85 ppb)8-Hour Ozone Standard (75 ppb)
Maryland Healthy Air Act (HAA) of 2006
• Most significant control program ever implemented in Maryland
• Partially a response to the problems with unlimited trading– Location does matter for ozone
• To implement the NOx SIP Call some Maryland power plants opted to purchase allowances instead of investing into controls
The Healthy Air Act• Most significant emission reducing
program ever adopted in Maryland• Widely applauded by the
environmental community• Environmental community and utilities
worked with MDE as partners to design and implement the law
• Almost $2.6 Billion investment for clean air by Maryland utilities
• Helped to dramatically clean the air– Fine particle levels dropped dramatically– Ozone levels dropped dramatically– Mercury emissions dropped dramatically
A Multi-Pollutant Approach• HAA driven by multiple
pollutants– HAA required reductions in 4
key pollutants at the States largest power plants
• Mercury• Sulfur dioxide (SO2)• Nitrogen oxide (NOx)• Greenhouse gases • Also drove reductions in direct
particulate, hydrogen chloride and other air toxics
So … What Controls Were Installed?• 6 Flue Gas Desulfurizers (FGDs)• 2 Baghouses• 2 Hydrated Limestone injection
systems• 7 SCRs*• 6 SNCRs• 6 PAC (Powdered Activation
Carbon) injection systems• These controls were installed on
coal units ranging in size from 125-700 MW.• All in a 2 to 3 year window
Regulatory Schedule and Jobs• State regulations adopted on July 7, 2007
– NOx reductions required by May 2009 (less than 2 years)– SO2 and Hg reductions by January 2010 (about 2.5 years)
• Required extensive effort by MD generators– Also required significant effort by MDE, the MD Public
Service Commission, the MD DNR and others– All deadlines met, no extensions needed
• Jobs resulting from HAA implementation– About 90 permanent jobs– Over 3000 jobs during peak construction period
The Results – Mercury & Other Air Toxics
Mercury Emissions From Maryland Coal Power Plants
1614
142
953
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2008 2009 2010
lbs/
year
• Mercury– Exceeded 2012 90% reduction requirement in 2010
• Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) reduced 83%• Direct particulate matter reduced 60%
What Did Maryland Generators Think?• Constellation Energy
– “We recently completed the installation of a major air quality control system, including scrubbers, a baghouse, and other equipment at one of our major coal facilities in Maryland,” said Paul Allen, senior vice president and chief environmental officer of Constellation Energy.
“These systems work effectively and result in dramatically lower emissions of mercury, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and acid gases. We know from experience that constructing this technology can be done in a reasonable time frame, especially with good advance planning; and there is meaningful job creation associated with the projects.”
• March 16, 2011 press release
Others on Maryland's Healthy Air Act
• The National Wildlife Federation– Maryland’s Healthy Air Act
would save 96 lives each year in 2010 compared to 27 lives saved under existing federal air rules
– The Healthy Air Act’s curbs on air pollution will save 17,350 workdays each year in 2010, compared to 4,925 workdays saved under federal air rules.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Mar-03 Aug-04 Dec-05 Apr-07 Sep-08 Jan-10 Jun-11 Oct-12
Th
ou
san
ds
of
qu
art
erl
y N
Ox
To
ns
BrandonShoresWagner
Crane
R Paul Smith
Morgantown
Chalk Point
Dickerson
other
NOx Emission TrendsQuarterly NOx Emissions by Plant
Phase 1 Healthy Air Act
Controls in Place
• Maryland has already implemented aggressive pollution controls on Maryland power plants
• The controls generated very deep reductions …– For each Company
• Not each plant– For the year and for the summer ozone season
• Not for each day
• These controls have been very effective and did what they were supposed to do– Maryland is measuring attainment for fine
particulates– 8-hour ozone levels have dropped dramatically
under the 85 ppb ozone standard• The new ozone standard (75 ppb) and the new
1-hour SO2 standard now require us to refocus on– Plant-by-plant controls and– Hourly and daily emission limits
Summary
New Challenges• HAA and other NOx and SO2 control
programs have served their purpose• The air is significantly cleaner• New standards for ozone and SO2
present significant new challenges that will require additional and different types of control programs for Maryland’s power sector
• The new SO2 and ozone standards will require limits that are designed to limit short-term emissions at each unit on peak emission days– Unit-by-unit emission limits– Short-term
• Hourly or daily
What Does the Data Tell Us?• For the next 60 minutes, we will
be reviewing plant-by-plant and unit-by-unit data for Maryland’s coal-fired generating units
• Data from the Emission Collection and Monitoring Plan System (ECMPS)
• Raven, NRG and AES Warrior Run• NOx and SO2 data reviewed
– Case-by-case, unit-by-unit analyses of short-term rates
• Also providing MDE current thinking on what 24-hour or hourly NOx and SO2 limits might be