Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political...

13
Department of Political Science __________________________________________________________ PhD in Political Science Comprehensive Examination Guidebook Spring 2017 Contents Pages 2-3: Examination Overview and General Directions Pages 4-8: Reading Lists Page 4- General Theory and Methodology Page 5- American Government Page 5- Comparative Politics Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public Policy Page 8-13: Sample Questions for Written Examination Page 9- General Theory and Methodology Page 10- American Government Page 11- Comparative Politics Page 11- International Relations Page 11- Public Policy

Transcript of Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political...

Page 1: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

DepartmentofPoliticalScience

__________________________________________________________PhDinPoliticalScience ComprehensiveExaminationGuidebookSpring2017

Contents Pages2-3: ExaminationOverviewandGeneralDirectionsPages4-8: ReadingLists

Page4- GeneralTheoryandMethodologyPage5- AmericanGovernmentPage5- ComparativePoliticsPage6- InternationalRelationsPage7- PublicPolicy

Page8-13: SampleQuestionsforWrittenExamination

Page9- GeneralTheoryandMethodologyPage10- AmericanGovernmentPage11- ComparativePoliticsPage11- InternationalRelationsPage11- PublicPolicy

Page 2: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

2 | P a g e

EXAMINATIONOVERVIEWANDGENERALDIRECTIONSDoctoralstudentssitforthecomprehensiveexaminationattheconclusionofallrequiredcoursework.Thecomprehensiveexaminationconsistsofawrittenandoralcomponent.Thewrittencomponentoftheexamisbasedontheliteratureandresearchintherelevantfieldofstudyandonthestudent’scompletedcourseworkinthatfield.PetitioningtoSitfortheExaminationYourfirststepistopetitiontoparticipateintheexamination.UsetheDepartment’sgraduatepetitionformandincludethefollowinginformation:

1) generalstatementofintenttositforacomprehensiveexamination,2) proposedprimaryandsecondaryfieldsareas(seebelow),and3) alistortablelistingallgraduatecoursescompletedalongwiththefacultyinstructorforthe

courseandthegradeearnedThispetitionshouldbecompletedearlyintheregistrationperiodforwhenthestudentplanstositfortheexam.Allexamineesmustselectaprimaryandsecondaryfieldfromthefollowinglist:

• AmericanGovernment• ComparativePolitics

• InternationalRelations• PublicPolicy

Afteryourpetitionissubmitted,youshouldcontactandspeakwiththechairofthePhDprogram,ProfessorDenisSullivan.Ifatallpossible,thisinitialmeetingshouldtakeplacepriortothesemesterwhenyouplantositfortheexam.Basedonthisdiscussion,ProfessorSullivanmayreferyoutootherfacultymembersdependingonyourproposedfieldareasandquestions.Althoughtherearereadinglistsandsamplequestionslaterinthisbooklet,facultymayrecommendotherreadingsandquestionsthatwillhelpyoufocusonareasofpotentialweakness.RegistrationOnceyourpetitionhasbeenapproved,youmustregisterforPOLS8960,QualifyingExaminationPreparation,forthesemesteryouaretakingthecomprehensiveexam.Thisconstitutesfull-timeregistration.ExceptforspecialcircumstancesapprovedbytheDepartmentandtheGraduateSchool,nocoursesshouldbetakenduringthesemesterwhenyouaresittingforyourcomprehensiveexaminations.TheExaminationTheexaminationisofferedinthefallsemesterandthespringsemester.ThewrittenportionwillgenerallybescheduledinNovemberinthefallandmidMarchinthespring.Theexamisapproximately5hoursinduration(whichincludesarequiredbreak)andconsistsofatotalofthreequestions,onequestionfromeachofthreeofthefollowingcategories:

• generaltheoryandmethodology• thestudent’sprimaryfield• thestudent’ssecondaryfield

Page 3: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

3 | P a g e

TheexammustbetypedonacomputerinRenaissancePark.Studentsdonothaveaccesstonotesorothermaterialduringtheexam.Thewrittenportionoftheexamisreviewedconsideringthethefollowingcriteria:1)knowledgeoftheliterature;2)effectivecommunication;3)synthesisofmajorthemesintheliterature;4)applicationoftheoreticalandmethodologicalconceptstocurrentpoliticalpoliciesandproblems;and5)independentthoughtbeyondtheliterature.Thewrittenportionoftheexamisnotinandofitselfgraded,thoughitisassessedbyacommitteeoffaculty.Ifthatassessmentispositive,thestudentproceedstotheoralexamination.Theoralcomponentoftheexaminationisapproximately90minuteslongandisusuallygivenwithintwotothreeweeksaftercompletionofthewrittenexamination.Thisexamcoversquestionsandissuesraisedinthewrittenexam,butitmaygobeyondthattocovermoregeneraltopicsrelevanttothestudent’sareaofstudy.Discussionmayalsotakeplaceonthestudent’slikelydissertationtopic.Anoverallassessment–passwithdistinction,pass,orfail–ismadeaftertheoralexamination.Thoseassessedaspassorpasswithdistinction,andwhohavesatisfactorilycompletedallrequiredcoursework,areformallynominatedfordoctoralcandidacy.Studentswhofailtheexaminationaftertheirfirstattemptareallowedtopetitiontore-taketheexaminationinasubsequentsemester.Barringextraordinarycircumstances,aPhDstudentwillnotbeallowedtositfortheexammorethantwotimes. AfterPassingtheExaminationAdissertationisrequiredofallPhDCandidates.OnceaPhDstudenthasreachedcandidacy,he/shehasfiveyearstocompleteanddefendthedissertation.Additionally,oncedegreecandidacyisattained,registrationmustbecontinuousuntilgraduationrequirementshavebeenmet.ForeachofthefirsttwosemestersthatadoctoralcandidateisworkingonadissertationthestudentmustregisterforPOLS9990:DoctoralDissertation.Foreachsemesterbeyondthefirsttwosemesters,thestudentmustregisterforPOLS9996:DoctoralDissertationContinuationuntilthedissertationisapprovedbytheGraduateSchoolandissubmittedtotheUniversityLibrary.StudentsdonotregisterforPOLS9990orPOLS9996duringthesummer,unlessthatiswhenthedefenseisscheduled.PleaseseethegraduateprogramofficeortheDepartmentwebsiteforgeneralinformationonpreparingyourdissertationproposal.Thisproposalistobecompletedwithinsixmonthsafterreachingdoctoralcandidacyandiswritteninclosecollaborationwithfacultyonyourdissertationcommittee.Fordetailedinformationonguidelines,rules,andregulationsonthepropersubmissionofacompleteddissertationpleaseseetheGraduateSchoolSubmissionguideonthiswebpage,(http://www.northeastern.edu/casgraduate/commencement/thesis_guidelines/.

Page 4: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

4 | P a g e

COMPREHENSIVEEXAMREADINGLISTS Updated—Spring2017Thewrittenportionofthecomprehensiveexamsconsistsofthreequestions:

1) AquestioninGeneralMethodologyandTheory2) AquestionfromyourPrimaryField3) AquestionfromyourSecondaryField

Please note, students should review the most recent syllabi of the respective field seminars and, if necessary, consult with the instructor for that course. The required readings in these seminars are an important starting point for reviewing the literature. The readings listed below constitute the other major source for reviewing the literature. In addition, relevant writings by faculty in the Department might also be consulted. This list will be updated periodically. GENERALMETHODOLOGYANDTHEORY

— Berg,BruceL.2006.QualitativeResearchMethodsfortheSocialSciences.6thed.Boston:Allyn&Bacon.

— Carlson,JamesM.andHyde,MarkS.2003.DoingEmpiricalResearch.Boston:HoughtonMifflin.(orJohnson&Reynoldsetal.)

— Cramer,DuncanandHowitt,Dennis.2004.TheSageDictionaryofStatistics.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.

— Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in ComparativePolitics.AnnArbor:UniversityofMichiganPress.

— Goodin,RobertE.andKlingermann,Hans-Dieter,eds.1996.ANewHandbookofPoliticalScience.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.

— Johnson, JanetB.andReynolds,H.T.2004.PoliticalScienceResearchMethods.5thed.Washington,DC:CQPress.(orCarlson&Hyde)

— Jones,GeraldE.2000.HowtoLiewithCharts.Lincoln,NE:AuthorsChoicePress.

— King,Gary;Keohane,RobertO.andVerba,Sidney.1994.DesigningSocialScienceInquiry:ScientificResearchInferenceinQualitativeResearch.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Nardi,PeterM.2003.DoingSurveyResearch.Boston:Allyn&Bacon.

— Pollock,Philip.2005.TheEssentialsofPoliticalAnalysis.2nded.Washington,DC:CQPress.

— Przeworski,AdamandTeune,Henry.1982.TheLogicofComparativeSocialInquiry.Malibar,FL:Krieger.

— Ragin, Charles C. 1992. The ComparativeMethod:Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies.Berkley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.

— Salkind,Neil.2006.ExploringResearch.6thed.UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:PrenticeHall.

— Shoemaker,PamelaJ.;Tankard,JamesW.,andLasorsa,DominicL.2003.HowtoBuildSocialScienceTheories.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.

— Rochefort,DavidA.,ed.2006.QuantitativeMethodsinPractice:ReadingsfromPS.Washington,DC:CQPress.

— Vogt,W.Paul.2005.DictionaryofStatisticsandMethodology:ANontechnicalGuide for theSocialSciences.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.

Page 5: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

5 | P a g e

— Yin,RobertK.2002.CaseStudyResearch.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.

AMERICANGOVERNMENT

— Aldrich, John. 1995.Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

— Allison,Graham.1971.EssenceofDecision.NewYork:HarperCollins.

— Arnold,Douglas.1990.TheLogicofCongressionalAction.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniversityPress.

— Burns,JamesMacGregor.2009.PackingtheCourt:TheRiseofJudicialPowerandtheComingCrisisoftheSupremeCourt.Penguin.

— Canon,BradleyandCharlesJohnson.1999.JudicialPolicies:ImplementationandImpact,2ded.CQPress.

— Carmines,EdwardandStimson,James.1989.IssueEvolution:RaceandtheTransformationofAmericanPolitics.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Dahl,Robert.1956.APrefacetoDemocraticTheory.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

— Edwards,George.1989.AttheMargins:PresidentialLeadershipofCongress.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniversityPress.

— Epstein,Lee.1995.ContemplatingCourts.Washington,DC:CQPress.

— Fisher,Louis.1988.ConstitutionalDialogues:InterpretationasPoliticalProcess.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Forina,Morris. 1989.Congress: Keystoneof theWashington Establishment.NewHaven, CT: YaleUniversityPress.

— Hedge,David.1998.GovernanceandtheChangingAmericanStates.Boulder,CO:WestviewPress.

— Levinson,Sanford.2006.OurUndemocraticConstitution.OxfordUniversityPress.

— Light,Paul.1997.TheTidesofReform.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniversityPress.

— Light,Paul.1992.ForgingLegislation.NewYork:W.W.Norton.

— Meier,Ken.1985.Regulation:Politics,Bureaucracy,andEconomics.NewYork:St.MartinsPress.

— Neustadt,Richard.1990.PresidentialPowerandtheModernPresidents.NewYork:TheFreePress.

— O’Brien,DavidM.2008.StormCenter:TheSupremeCourtinAmericanPolitics.Norton.

— Rakove,Jack.1996.OriginalMeanings:PoliticsandIdeasintheMakingoftheConstitution.Vintage.

— Rosenthal,Alan.2012.TheBestJobinPolitics:ExploringHowGovernorsSucceedasPolicyLeaders.CQPress.

— Rosenthal,Alan.2008.EnginesofDemocracy:PoliticsandPolicymakinginStateLegislatures.CQPress.

— Schattschneider,ElmerE.1960.TheSemisovereignPeople:ARealist’sViewofDemocracyinAmerica.Hinsdale,IL:DrydenPress.

— Segal,JeffreyandHaroldSpaeth.1993.TheSupremeCourtandtheAttitudinalModel.CambridgeUniversityPress.

— Skowronek,Stephen.1993.ThePoliticsPresidentsMake:LeadershipfromJohnAdamstoGeorgeBush.Cambridge,MA:BelknapPress.

— Tribe,LaurenceH.2008.TheInvisibleConstitution.OxfordUniversityPress.

— Walker,David.1995.TheRebirthofFederalism.Chatham,NJ:ChathamHouse.

Page 6: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

6 | P a g e

— Weaver,R.KentandRockman,BertA.1993.DoInstitutionsMatter?:GovernmentCapabilities intheUnitedStatesandAbroad.Washington,D.C.:BrookingsInstitution.

— Whittington, Keith. 1999.Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and ConstitutionalMeaning.HarvardUniversityPress.

— Wilson,JamesQ.1989.Bureaucracy.NewYork:BasicBooks.

COMPARATIVEPOLITICS— Almond,GabrielandSydneyVerba.1963.TheCivicCulture:PoliticalAttitudesandDemocracyinFiveNations.NewburyPark,CA:SagePublications.

— Almond,GabrielandSydneyVerba,eds.1989.TheCivicCultureRevisited.NewburyPark,CA:SagePublications.

— Anderson,Benedict.1983.ImaginedCommunities.NewYork,NY:Verso.

— Barreto,Amilcar.2009.NationalismandItsLogicalFoundations.Palgrave-MacMillan.

— Bates,RobertH.2001.Prosperity&Violence:ThePoliticalEconomyofDevelopment.NewYork:W.W.Norton.

— Bermeo,Nancy.2003.OrdinaryPeopleinExtraordinaryTimes:TheCitizenryandtheBreakdownofDemocracy.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Chilcote,RonaldH.1994.TheoriesofComparativePolitics.Boulder,CO:WestviewPress.

— Dahl,Robert.1971.Polyarchy.NewHaven:YaleUniversityPress.

— Dahl,Robert.1956.APrefacetoDemocraticTheory.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

— Fearon,JamesandDavidLaitin.2003.“Ethnicity,Insurgency,andCivilWar,”AmericanPoliticalScienceReview97:75-90.

— Hall,P.A.andTaylor,R.1996.“PoliticalScienceandtheThreeInstitutionalisms.”

— Huntington,Samuel,PoliticalOrderinChangingSocieties,1968,pp.1-92and344-361.— Huntington, Samuel, 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, University ofOklahomaPress.pp.xiii-xv,chapters1-4.

— Lichbach,MarkI.andAlanS.Zuckerman,eds.1997.ComparativePolitics:Rationality,Culture,andStructure.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

— Lijphart,Arend.1999.PatternsofDemocracy.NewHaven:YaleUniversityPress.

— Michels,Robert.1999(1915).PoliticalParties:ASociologicalStudyoftheOligarchicalTendenciesofModernDemocracy.NewYork:Transaction.

— Migdal,JoelS.2001.StateinSociety:StudyingHowStatesandSocietiesTransformandConstituteOneAnother.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

— Moore,Barrington.1968.SocialOriginsofDictatorshipandDemocracy.— Poggi,Gianfranco.1978.TheDevelopmentoftheModernState.Stanford,CA:StanfordUniversityPress.

— Przeworski,AdamandHenryTeune.1970.TheLogicofComparativeSocialInquiry.Malabar,FL:Krieger.

— Putnam,Robert.1993.MakingDemocracyWork:CivicTraditionsinModernItaly.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Schumpeter,Joseph.1950.Capitalism,SocialismandDemocracy.NewYork:Harper.

— Scott,James.WeaponsoftheWeak,prefaceandchapters1,2,and8.— Skocpol,Theda.1979.States&SocialRevolutions:AComparativeAnalysisofFrance,Russia&China.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

— Skocpol,Theda.1973.“ACriticalReviewofBarringtonMoore’sSocialPoliticsandSociety.

Page 7: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

7 | P a g e

— Smith,AnthonyD.2004.NationsofAntiquity.Malden,MA:Polity.

— Snyder,Jack.2000.FromVotingtoViolence:DemocratizationandNationalistConflict.Chapter1.— Spruyt,Hendrik.1994.TheSovereignStateandItsCompetitors.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Tilly,Charles.1990.Coercion,CapitalandEuropeanStates.Cambridge,MA:BlackwellPublishers.

— Tsebelis,George.1990.NestedGames:RationalChoiceinComparativePolitics.Berkeley:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.

— Tocqueville,Alexisde.DemocracyinAmerica.Introduction,vol1.Part1chapters5-6andlast4sectionsof8;vol.1Part2chapter6sections3-4;vol2part2chapters1-13;vol2part3chapters1-4,13-14,19.

— Weber,Max.“Bureaucracy,”inGerth&Mills,eds.,EssaysfromMaxWeberandReinhardBendix,MaxWeber,pp. 285-307 and 324-457.Whitehead, Laurence. 2002. Democratization: Theory and Experience. New York:OxfordUniversityPress

— Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and ElSalvador.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

INTERNATIONALRELATIONS— Alter,KarenJ.,andSophieMeunier .2009.ThePoliticsof InternationalRegimeComplexity.PerspectivesonPolitics7(1):13–24.

— Baldwin,David.“PowerAnalysisinWorldPolitics:NewTrendsversusOldTendencies,”WorldPolitics31.

— Barnett,MichaelandMartha,“ThePolitics,PowerandPathologiesof InternationalRelations,” InternationalOrganization53/4

— Bull,Hedley.1977.TheAnarchicalSociety.

— Dolye,Michael,“LiberalismandWorldPolitics,”AmericanPoliticalScienceReview(December1986).

— Finnemore,Martha.1996.NationalInterestsinInternationalSociety.

— Finnemore,MarthaandKatherynSikkink.“InternationalNormDynamicsandPoliticalChange,” InternationalOrganization52:4.

— Finnemore, Martha. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force (Ithaca: CornellUniversityPress,2003).

— Gilpin,Robert.1981.WarandChangeinWorldPolitics.Cambridge,MA:CambridgeUniversityPress.

— Goldstein,JudithandRobertKeohane(eds.)IdeasandForeignPolicy,chapters1&7.— Gourevitch,Peter.1978.“TheSecondImageReversed,”InternationalOrganization.32:4.

— Haas,Peter.“DoRegimesMatter?EpistemicCommunitiesandMediterraneanPollutionControl,”InternationalOrganization43.

— Hoffman,Stanley.1981.DutiesBehondBorders:OntheLimitsandPossibilitiesofEthicalInternationalPolitics.

— Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of theWorldOrder. NormanOK:UniversityofOklahomaPress.

— Ikenberry, John. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order(Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,2011).

— Jervis.Robert.1976.PerceptionandMisperceptioninInternationalPolitics.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Kant,Immanuel,“ToPerpetualPeace:APhilosophicalSketch,”inPerpetualPeaceandotherEssaysonPolitics,HistoryandMorals.

— Katzenstein,Peter. 1996. TheCultureofNationalSecurity:NormsandIdentity inWorldPolitics. NewYork:

Page 8: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

8 | P a g e

ColumbiaUniversityPress.

— Katzenstein,Peter,BetweenPowerandPlenty,Chapters1,9.— Keck,Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: AdvocacyNetworks in InternationalPolitics.Ithaca:CornellUniversityPress.

— Keohane,RobertO.andJosephS.Nye.2001.PowerandInterdependence.3rdEdition.NewYork:Longman.

— Keohane,RobertO.2005.AfterHegemony:CooperationandDiscordintheWorldPoliticalEconomy.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Krasner,Stephen,“StatePowerandtheStructureofForeignTrade,”WorldPolitics.

— Krasner,Stephen,Sovereignty.

— Kydd,AndrewH.,andBarbaraF.Walter."Thestrategiesofterrorism."InternationalSecurity31.1(2006):49-80.

— Legro,JeffreyandAndrewMoravcsik,“IsAnybodyStillaRealist?”InternationalSecurity24:2.

— Martin, Lisa andBeth Simmons, “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,” InternationalOrganization52:4

— Mearsheimer,John.“TheFalsePromiseofInternationalInstitutions,“InternationalSecurity.

— Milner, Helen, “Globalization, Development, and International Institutions: Normative and PositivePerspectives,”PerspectivesonPolitics3:4,2005.

— Moravcsik,Andrew,“TakingPreferencesSeriously:LiberalismandInternationalRelationsTheory,”InternationalOrganization(Fall1997)

— Morgenthau,Hans.1948.PoliticsAmongNations:TheStruggleforPowerandPeace.

— Nye,Joseph.SoftPower:TheMeanstoSuccessinWorldPolitics,PublicAffairs,2005.

— Owen,John,LiberalPeace,LiberalWar.

— Putnam,Robert,“DiplomacyandDomesticPolitics:TheLogicofTwo-LevelGames,”InternationalOrganization

— Risse,Thomas.“Let’sArgue:CommunicativeActioninWorldPolitics.”Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

— Rose,Gideon,“NeoclassicalRealismandTheoriesofForeignPolicy,WorldPolitics,October1998.

— Ruggie,John.“WhatMakestheWorldHangTogether,”Neo-UtilitarianismandSocialConstructivistChallenge,”InternationalOrganization52.

— Sagan,Scott,“WhydoStatesBuildNuclearWeapons?ThreeModelsinSearchofaBomb,”InternationalSecurity21.

— SeanM.Lynn-Jones,“Preface”inM.E.Brownetal.,DebatingtheDemocraticPeace.pp.ix-xxxiii.

— Slaughter,Anne-Marie,ANewWorldOrder,PrincetonUniversityPress

— Snyder,Jack,MythsofEmpire,chapters1-2,8.

— Sylvester,C.(2009)“Thecontributionsoffeministtheorytointernationalrelations”inTheoriesofInternationalRelations

— Tannenwald,Nina.“StigmatizingtheBomb:OriginsoftheNuclearTaboo,”InternationalSecurity29:4,2005.

— Thucydides,TheHistoryofthePeloponnesianWar,BookV,TheMelianDialogue

— Tickner,J.Ann.2001.GenderingWorldPolitics:IssuesandApproachesinthePost-ColdWarEra.NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress.

— Walt,Stephen,TheOriginsofAlliances

— Waltz,Kenneth.2001.Man,theState,andWar.NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress.

Page 9: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

9 | P a g e

— Waltz,Kenneth.1999.TheoryofInternationalPolitics.

— Walzer,Michael.JustandUnjustWars:AMoralArgumentwithHistoricalIllustration,BasicBooks,2000.

— Wendt,Alexander.1999.SocialTheoryofInternationalPolitics.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

PUBLICPOLICY— Bardach,Eugene.2011.APracticalGuideforPolicyAnalysis,4thed.CQPress.

— Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, BryanD. 2009.Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd Edition.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

— Blake,CharlesandJessicaAdollno.2007.ComparingPublicPolicies,2nded.CQPress.

— Bobrow,DavisandDryzek,John.1987.PolicyAnalysisbyDesign.Pittsburgh:UniversityofPittsburghPress.

— Downs,Anthony.1957.AnEconomicTheoryofDemocracy.NewYork:Harper.

— Eduardo,Araral,Jr.etal.(eds.).2013.RoutledgeHandbookofPublicPolicy.RoutledgePress.

— Fischer,Frank.1995.EvaluatingPublicPolicy.Chicago:Nelson-HallPublishers.

— Gladwell,Malcolm.2002.TheTippingPoint.BackBayBooks.

— Goggin,Malcolm;Bowman,Ann;Lester,JamesandO’Toole,Jr.,Laurence.1990.ImplementationTheoryandPractice.Glenview,IL:ScottForesman/LittleBrown.

— Hargrove,ErwinandJohnGlidewell.1990.ImpossibleJobsinPublicManagement.Lawrence,KS:UniversityPressofKansas.

— Heineman,Robert;Bluhm,WilliamT.;Peter,StevenA.andKearny,EdwardN.,eds.1991.TheWorldofthePolicyAnalyst.Chatham,NJ:ChathamHouse.

— Hill,MichaelandPeterHupe.2003.ImplementingPublicPolicy.SagePublications.

— Hood,ChristopherandHelenMargetts.2007.TheToolsofGovernmentintheDigitalAge.PalgraveMacmillian.

— Howlett,MichaelandM.Ramesh.1995.StudyingPublicPolicy:PolicyCyclesandPolicySubsystems.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.

— Judd,DennisandSwanstrom,Todd.2002.CityPolitics:PrivatePowerandPublicPolicy.3rded.NewYork:Longman.

— Kingdon,John.2010.Agendas,Alternatives,andPublicPolicies.UpdateEdition.HarperCollins.

— Kraft,MichaelandScottFurlong.2007.PublicPolicy:Politics,Analysis,andAlternatives.2nd.Ed.

— Lipset,SeymourMartin.1997.AmericanExceptionalism.W.W.Norton.

— McDonough,JohnE.2000.ExperiencingPolitics.UniversityofCaliforniaPress.

— Moran,Michael,etal.2006.TheOxfordHandbookofPublicPolicy.OxfordUniversityPress.

— Olson,Mancur.1965.TheLogicofCollectiveAction.Cambridge:HarvardUniversityPress.

— Osborne,DavidandPlastrik,Peter.1997.BanishingBureaucracy.NewYork:Penguin.

— Parson,D.W.Parson.1995.PublicPolicy.EdwardElgarPublishers.

— Peters,Guy.1997.AmericanPublicPolicy.Chatham,NJ:ChathamHouse.

— PolicyStudiesJournal.2009.SpecialEditiononPolicyTheory.Vol.37,Issue1.

Page 10: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

10 | P a g e

— Rochefort,DavidandRogerCobb.1994.PoliticsofProblemDefinition.UniversityPressofKansas.

— Rose,Richard.1993.Lesson-DrawinginPublicPolicy:AGuidetoLearningAcrossTimeandSpace.Chatham,NJ:ChathamHouse.

— Rosenberg,Gerald.1991.TheHollowHope:CanCourtsBringAboutSocialChange?Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

— Sabatier,Paul.2007.TheoriesofthePolicyProcess.2ndEd.Boulder,CO:WestviewPress.

— Schneider,AnneandHelenIngram.1997.PolicyDesignforDemocracy.UniversityPressofKansas.

— Smith,KevinandChristopherLarimer.2009.ThePublicPolicyTheoryPrimer.WestviewPress.

— Stone,Deborah.2012.PolicyParadox:TheArtofPoliticalDecisionMaking,3rded.NewYork:Norton.

— Theodoulou,StellaZ.andCahn,MatthewA.,eds.1994.PublicPolicy:TheEssentialReadings.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:PrenticeHall.

— Wildavsky,Aaron.1992.TheNewPoliticsoftheBudgetaryProcess.NewYork:HarperCollins.

COMPREHENSIVEEXAMSAMPLEQUESTIONS Updated—Fall2016Thefollowingquestionsaretypicalofthoseaskedineachofthecomprehensiveexamareas.However,theyaresamplesonly.Theydonotnecessarilycovereveryquestionorareayoumightbeaskedaboutinyourexamination. SampleMethodologyandGeneralTheoryQuestions

1. Youhavejustagreedtoteachacourseonmethodstograduatestudentsinpublicpolicyatyourlocaluniversity.Onceyou’vemetthestudents,youfindthattheyfallintotwowarringcamps:onegroup is very quantitatively oriented and loves learning about the application of statisticaltechniquesinpolicyresearch;theothergroupeschewsthisapproach,favoringthemethodsandinsightsofqualitativeresearch.Howwouldyouteachthiscoursetobringthesestudentfactionsto somekindofmiddlegroundwherebothunderstandandappreciate theuseof theother’sapproach? Inteachingthisclass,whatwouldyoutellstudentsaboutthekindsofproblemsorquestionsthatarebesthandledbyeachmethodology?Howwouldyoudemonstratethatthereareresearchtopicsrequiringquantitativeaswellasqualitativeanalysisforafullunderstandingofthepolicydynamicsinvolved?

2. Congratulations!YouhavesuccessfullypassedyourPh.D.ComprehensiveExamsatNortheasternUniversityandyouhavedecidedthata“casestudy”approachisthemostappropriatedesigntouseforyourdissertation;however,youhavebeentoldbyyourdissertationadvisorthatyoumustuseacomparativecasestudyapproachinthisresearch,givenyourresearchquestion.Youareplanningtomeetwithyourentirecommitteetoexplainyourproposedresearchdesign.Inpreparingforthisyouradvisorasksyoutoprepareahandoutwithadiscussionofeachofthefollowing.

• Whatisthenatureofyourproposedresearchincludingtheresearchquestion?(1paragraph)

Page 11: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

11 | P a g e

• Howandwhymightyouusea“mostsimilarsystems”design?(Becertaintorelateyourresponsetothenatureofyourresearchquestion.)

• Howandwhymightyouusea“mostdifferentsystems”design?(Becertaintorelateyourresponsetothenatureofyourresearchquestion.)

• Whatarethemostimportantfactorsindecidingwhichapproachtousebetweenthesetwochoices?

3. Scholarsinourdisciplinecontinuetodebatetheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofstudiesbasedonthecase-studyapproachversustheso-called“large-N”studies.

a) Whatwouldyouhighlightastheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofthetwoapproaches?b) Howdothetwolendthemselves,ornot,toquantitativeandqualitativeanalyses?c) Aretherewaysthetwoapproachesmightbecombinedwithinasingleresearchdesign?

Finally,pleasediscusshowtheseapproacheshavebeenappliedinthepolicyareayouaremostinterestedinstudyingandwithwhatresults?

SampleAmericanGovernmentQuestions1. Incomparativeterms,itisoftenclaimedthatAmericanpoliticalpartiesareweakerthanparties

inmostothercountries,whileAmericaninterestgroupsarestronger.Takeeitherhalfofthisclaimandassessit.AreAmericanpartiesespeciallyweak/interestgroupsespeciallystrong?Ifso,whatfeaturesofAmericansocietyandtheAmericanpoliticalsystemareresponsibleforthischaracteristic?

2. ThedevelopmentofpublicpolicyatthelevelofAmericannationalgovernmentisoften

portrayedascomingfromaclashbetweenCongressandthepresidency.Selectoneofthesetwobranches,andassessitspower.Whatconstitutionalorotherresourcesdoesithave?Whatobstaclesdoesitface?Howhasitspowerchangedovertime?

3. TwokeycharacteristicsinAmericangovernmentaretheseparationofpowersandfederalism.Ingeneral,whatimpactdoeseachhaveonpublicpolicymakingintheAmericancontext?Howdosuchinstitutionalfactorsfigureintocontemporarytheoreticalmodelsofthepolicyprocessthatfocusontopicslikeagendasetting,policyinnovation,andpoliticaleconomy?Usespecificexamplesandmakereferencestotheliteraturewhereappropriate.

SampleComparativePoliticsQuestions1. Chooseanimportantissueregardingacountryinwhichyouhaveaparticularresearchinterest.

Pleaseexplainhowatleastthreetheoreticalapproachestothestudyofcomparativepoliticsmighthelpustobetterunderstandthatissue.Notelimitationsaswellaspossibledistortionsproducedbythesetheories.(Youarefreealsotoarguethattwoofthetheoriesyouselectareoflittlehelpinunderstandingtheissue.)

2. WithinComparativePoliticstherearethreeprimaryapproaches:PoliticalCulture,Structure,and

RationalChoice.Somecontendthatthethreearemutuallyexclusive.Otherssuggestthattheymightbecomplementary.Taketwoofthesethreeapproachesanddiscusshowthosetwo

Page 12: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

12 | P a g e

complementeachotherwhenitcomestocomparativeanalysis.Backyourargumentwithadiscussionofsomeofthekeyfigures/authorsinthetwoareasyouselect.

3. Regardlessofourresearchpreferenceswewillalwaysbeconfrontedwithscholarswhowriteonourtopicareafromdifferenttheoreticalandmethodologicalapproaches.Asastudentofcomparativepolitics,howdoyouorganizethisseemingchaos?Howdomajorresearchparadigmshelporhurtinorganizingthedisciplineandourpersonalresearchprojectinlightoftherestofthediscipline?ProvideexamplesfromthescholarlyliteratureonComparativePoliticsand/orMethodologywhenansweringthesequestions.

SampleInternationalRelationsQuestions1. Takingonemajorconflictinvolvinginternationalactorspleasewriteananalysisexplaininghow

atleastthreeinternationalrelationstheoriescanhelpusunderstandthatconflict.Also,pleasenotelimitationsaswellaspossibledistortionsfromusingthesetheories.(Youarefreealsotoarguethattwoofthetheoriesyouselectareoflittlehelpinunderstandingtheconflict.)

2. Pleasewriteanessayexplaininghowinternationalrelationstheorycanhelpusunderstandonepoliticalsystemorpoliticalprobleminyourprimaryareaofresearch.Youshouldconsiderallmajortheoreticalapproachesyoucouldemploy,butyoushouldfocusprimarilyonatheoryortheoriesyouconsidertobemosthelpfulinunderstandingyoursubstantivefocus.Concludeyouranswerwithabriefconsiderationofthefollowingquestions:Whataspects,ifany,ofyoursubjectareaarenotamenabletotheoreticalanalysis,andhowmightthetheoreticalapproach(s)youpreferdistortone’sunderstandingofthesubject?Howmightyoupreventorcountersuchtheoreticalaswellasideologicaldistortionsinyouranalysis?

3. TheSeptember11,2001,terroristattacksspurredunprecedentedinterestinthestudyofterrorism.Andyet,fundamentalquestionsabouttoday’sterrorismthreatremainunsettled.Identifyadebatewithinthestudyofterrorism,explainitssignificancetounderstandingterrorism,andassesstheevidence.

SamplePublicPolicyQuestions1. Theliteratureonproblemdefinitionandagendasetting,takenasawhole,hasbecomeamajor

componentintheoriesofthepolicyprocessand,even,onapproachestopolicyanalysis.Usingthecoreliterature,applytheseconceptstoaspecificpolicyareaofyourchoice,explaininghowthedynamicsofproblemdefinition(forexample,Stone’snotionof“causalstories”)andofagendasettingshapethenatureofpolicydiscourse,theprobabilityofattentionbypolicymakers,and,finally,policyoutcomes.Whatarethelimitstowhichthesedynamicsofproblemdefinitionagendasettingcanexplainpolicyprocessesandoutcomes?Thatis,howmuchdootherfactors(e.g.,institutionaldesign,processrules)playaroleinshapingtheoutcomeinthisparticularinstance?Citeliteraturewherenecessaryanduseful.

2. Policyanalysishasbeencharacterizedasbothanartandascience.Explainthischaracterization,citingboththescientificandartisticcharacterofpolicyanalysis.Doyouagree?Explain.

Page 13: Department of Political Science PhD in Political … of Political Science _____ PhD in Political Science ... Page 6- International Relations Page 7- Public ... Political Science Research

13 | P a g e

3. Chooseanareaofpublicpolicywithwhichyouhavegoodfamiliarityanddescribethelatestmajor

pieceoflegislationorregulatoryinitiativeadoptedwithinthisdomain.Next,brieflyoutlinethealternativepolicyapproachesthatweresetasideinfavoroftheactualpolicyestablished.Usingconcepts/frameworks/theories from the literature on problem definition and agenda setting,explainwhythepolicymakingprocessonthisissuedevelopedandturnedoutasitdid.Finally,whatimplicationsforprogramimplementation(approach,challenges,likelyeffectiveness)followfromthefactthatpolicymakerssettledonthisparticularpolicydesignwhilerejectingmoreorlessambitiousalternatives?