TSV integration into silicon photonics interposer for next ...
'Department - KAIST · 2017. 4. 11. · Cu/Sn bumpwas electroplated on Cusignal line. To make a...
Transcript of 'Department - KAIST · 2017. 4. 11. · Cu/Sn bumpwas electroplated on Cusignal line. To make a...
Development and Evaluation of 3-D SiP with Vertically Interconnected Through Silicon Vias (TSV)
Dong Min Jang', Chunghyun Ryul*, Kwang Yong Lee2, Byeong Hoon Cho',Joungho Kiml*, Tae Sung Oh2, Won Jong Lee' and Jin Yu'
Center for Electronic Packaging Materials'Department of Materials Science and Engineering, KAIST373-1 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea
l Department of Electrical Engineering, KAIST2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hongik University
72-1 Sangsu-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul 121-791, Koreakkok78(ig,kaist.ac.kr, tel: 82-42-869-4274, fax: 82-42-869-8840
AbstractFor high density and performance of microelectronic
devices, the 3-D system in package (SiP) has been consideredas a superb microelectronic packaging system. Thedevelopment and evaluation of stacked chip type 3-D SiPwith vertically interconnected TSV are reported. The processincludes; 55ptm-diameter via holes by reactive ion etching(RIE), SiO2 dielectric layer by thermal oxidation, Ta and Cuseed layers by ionized metal plasma (IMP), Cu via filling byelectroplating, Cu/Sn bump for multi-chip stacking and finallychip-to-PCB bonding with Sn-3.OAg-0.5Cu solder and ENIGpad. A prototype 3-D SiP with 10 stacked chips wassuccessfully fabricated.
High frequency electrical model of the TSV was proposedand the model parameters were extracted from the measuredS-parameters. The proposed model was verified by TDR/TDT(time domain reflectometry/time domain transmission) andeye-diagram measurement. And then, contact resistances ofCu via and bump joint were discussed.
1. IntroductionThree dimensional system in package (3D SiP) has been
extensively studied for the advanced mobile devices of higherperformance and smaller size in recent years [1-6]. 3D stackpackages were initially developed with wire bonding formemory packages and SDRAM of cellular phone, which hadvarious advantages such as improvement of electricalperformance as well as reduction of size and weight [7]. Wirebonding has been used as an interconnection between thestacked devices and the circuit board. However, wire bondingis not appropriate for high performance and causes severaldisadvantages such as limitation of the size reduction anddeterioration of high frequency characteristics [1, 3]. As anew interconnection technology for 3D stacked packages,chip-to-chip vertical interconnection technology using TSVhas been proposed [8-10]. TSV technology can offer excellentelectrical performance and possibility of advanced wafer-level3D packaging or stacking of various types of micro-components directly on a CMOS chip [11-14]. However, toapply TSV technology to 3D stacked package, the electricalproperties of TSV should be characterized to estimate qualityof the signal in 3D stacked packages.
In this study, 3D interconnection technologies for chipstack packages are reported. Also the contact resistance of a3D interconnection joint was characterized with a TSVspecimen using a daisy chain structure. An equivalent circuitmodel of a test device with TSV was proposed, which was
fully composed of R (resistance) L (inductance) C(capacitance) G (substrate loss) components.
2. Experimental procedureVia holes of 4.2 to 75ptm diameter, 50 to 170ptm depth and
15 to 150ptm pitch were formed on 550ptm thick p-type (100)Si wafer with resisitivity of 1OQ cm by using deep RIE(Reactive Ion Etching). Especially, filling of via holes ofdiameter of 4.2-10ptm and depths of 50 70ptm were studiedto check the complete filling of very fine via holes. On thesurfaces of the silicon wafer and via holes, SiO2 layer of0.3ptm thickness was formed as an insulation layer between Siand Cu through vias by thermal oxidation method. As a seedlayer for electroplating Cu vias, 270 nm thick Ta and 1tmthick Cu films were sequentially deposited on the via wall andbottom using IMP (ionized metal plasma) sputtering. IMPsputtering utilizes inductively coupled plasma to ionizesputtered metal atoms and the resulting metal ions are thenaccelerated towards the substrate by applying bias to thesubstrate. After the deposition of Ta and Cu, the via holeswere filled with Cu electroplating with periodic pulse-reversecurrent plating method. The current density and pulse timewere fixed at 2 (fwd) / 5.5 (rev) mA/cm2 and 8 (fwd) / 2 (rev)ms, respectively. After via-filling, CMP (ChemicalMechanical Polishing) and back-side grinding wereperformed to the Si wafer to thin it to 150ptm thickness.
For interconnection between chips, Cu/Sn bumps of 70ptmdiameter were fabricated above the Cu vias by sequentialelectroplating of Cu 8ptm and Sn 2pm, after a deposition ofTi/Cu seed layer. The Ti/Cu seed layer was etched leaving theCu/Sn bumps. In the case of interlocking bump, it wasfabricated at Si chip without Cu via. The bumps were formedby electro-deposition of Cu and Sn. Sn bumps were 25 by25ptm sizes and 15ptm height, Cu interlocking bump was10ptm height and 5, 10, 15, 25ptm diameter. The specimenswere bonded at 150 °C for 180 sec with NCA as shown Fig.2(c). And then specimens were measured contact resistanceand chip shear force.
Two different substrates were used. One is print circuitboard (PCB) and the other is Si interposer. To form theinterconnection between the stacked chips and the PCBsubstrate, Sn-3.OAg-0.5Cu solder ball was deposited bystencil printing on PCB. In order to interconnect the solderball, 1tm-thick electroless Ni was plated under Cu via as anUBM. To use the PCB as a substrate, all the chips werestacked and then the stacked chips were reflowed on the PCBat 250°C for 30 sec. In the case of Si interposer substrate,
847 2007 Electronic Components and Technology Conference1-4244-0985-3/07/$25.00 02007 IEEE
Authorized licensed use limited to: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Downloaded on February 23,2010 at 21:28:00 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Cu/Sn bump was electroplated on Cu signal line. To make astacked packages, the chips were stacked one over anotherfrom Si interposer at 250 'C for 2 minutes with NonConductive Adhesive (NCA). The interconnection pitches ofthe PCB and the Si interposer were 500 and 150ptm,respectively.
To measure the high frequency electrical characteristics ofTSV, a coplanar waveguide on Si interposer with a ground-signal-ground via of 55pim diameter, 150ptm pitch wasfabricated. The coplanar waveguide is composed of three Culines and the width, length and thickness of the line are100ptm, 500tm, 10ptm, respectively. To connect the ground-signal-ground via to the coplanar waveguide on the substrate,Cu/Sn bumps were fabricated under the vias. The diameterand height of the Cu/Sn bump on Si interposer substrate are70pm and 10pm, respectively.
In order to measure the contact resistance ofinterconnection joints, a daisy chain structure was used.0.1 pm-thick Ti and 3 pm-thick Cu were sequentially sputter-deposited on a TSV chip with Cu/Sn bumps and patterned byusing the photolithography to form the 130pm-widemetallization line. For a substrate, Ti/Cu was sequentiallysputter-deposited on a Si wafer without the Cu vias andpatterned to form the 130ptm wide metallization line. Cu/Snbumps of 100ptm diameter were fabricated by sequentialelectroplating. Chip specimen were flip-chip bonded tosubstrate at 270°C for 2 minutes with a bonding pressure of1OMPa. The average resistance of Cu via and bump joint wasmeasured.
The vias with a diameter of down to 7.5 pm and aspectratio of 8.0 were perfectly filled as shown in fig. 1. The viaswith a diameter of 4.2 pm are not fully filled and currentlybeing studied. To fill the high aspect ratio via holes perfectly,conformal profiles of seed layer is crucial and this can beachieved by IMP sputtering.
Two types of interconnection method between chips areshown in Fig. 2. Those are a planar and an interlocking type.The planar type consists of electroplated Cu/Sn layer on Cuvia. The bonding process between chips was achieved bydirect contact of Cu/Sn bump and Cu via, as shown Fig. 2(a).During stacking chips, IMCs were formed. It has been usedfor other 3D SiP [15, 16]. The interlocking type is of Cuinterlocking bump and Sn chip bump in Fig. 2(b) and (c).
3. Results and Discussion3.1 Fabrication of 3D stacked packages up to 10 layers
Fig. 1 Optical images of Cu filled via holes with a diameterand aspect ratio of (a) 55ptm and 3.1, (b) 10ptm and 6.6, (c)7.5ptm and 8.0, and (d) 4.2pim and 11
Fig. 2. SEM images of (a) a planar bump, (b) aninterlocked bump (c) daisy chain structure withinterlocked bumps
Each method was formed by chemical reaction betweenCu via and solder bump and mechanical bond during joining,respectively. Both interconnections did not require any reflow
848 2007 Electronic Components and Technology Conference
Authorized licensed use limited to: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Downloaded on February 23,2010 at 21:28:00 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
and flux process. The flux always required a cleaning processto remove residues, which caused the degradation ofmechanical reliability. The interlocking interconnectionachieved higher shear stress and lower contact resistance forchip stacking, which could be controlled with bump diameterand bonding stress. For interlocking interconnection, thecontact resistance per bump was down to about 10 (mQ) andthe shear strength per 252 bumps was up to 400(g) as afunction ofbump diameter and bonding stress [17].
Chip stacking was successfully conducted by flip-chipbonding with planar type interconnection and NCA at 250°C,as shown in Fig. 3. Solder balls on the PCB in Fig. 3(a) werereflowed at 250 -C to react with electroless Ni UBM. Fig. 3(a)shows the cross-sectioned SEM images of Cu/Sn bump andSnAgCu solder ball joint. Each joint was well bonded withIMC formation. Fig. 3(b) shows the SEM images of 3Dstacked chip on Si interposer. The via diameter and pitch is55ptm and 150ptm, respectively.
3.2 High frequency electrical characteristic of TSVA schematic drawing of a high-frequency equivalent
circuit model of the ground-signal-ground via configuration isshown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 4 . A SEM image of the fabricated TSVPort 1
Ground via Signal ia Ground via-F s
l Port 2
Fig. 3. SEM images of stacked chip on (a) PCB and(b) Si interposer
Fig. 5. The equivalent circuit model of the TSV
The electrical model of the metallic via was expressed asan inductor (Lvia) and a resistor (Rvia), while the capacitivecoupling between the vias was modeled as couplingcapacitors (Cvia ox, Cox, and Cs-,). The parameter Cvia ox denotedthe capacitance of the thin oxide layer surrounding the viabarrel, and Cox denoted the capacitance of the oxide layer onthe silicon surface and the fringing field between the vias. Thecapacitance of the silicon substrate was denoted by Csil, andthe loss property of the silicon substrate between the signalvia and the ground via was denoted by Gsil. These modelparameters were determined by fitting the calculated S-parameters obtained from the suggested model to themeasured S-parameters obtained using the micro-probing.The extracted model parameters of the test device of Fig. 4are;
Cox-via= 910EF, Gsil= 1.69m/Q, Csil= 9fF, Cox= 3fF,
Lvia =LviaO /[1 + log( f )026]
Rvia = RviaO 1 +108
849 2007 Electronic Components and Technology Conference
Authorized licensed use limited to: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Downloaded on February 23,2010 at 21:28:00 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
where Lviao is the inductance (35 pH) of the via, Rviao is theresistance (12 mQ) of the via at a frequency of 0.1 GHz,considering skin effect of the via barrel.
Fig. 6 represents the measurement-based S-parameters ofthe test device and the model-based S-parameters. Themeasured S-parameters are well matched with the model-based S-parameters up to a frequency of 20 GHz.
(a)0
I=
-.02
7=
.; -1.0
.
Solid line = modelSvmbol line = measIliementI
0.1 L IFrequencyr [GHz]
Fig. 6. A comparison of the measuremerparameters (symbols) with the model-based S-parameters(solid line): (a) magnitude of S21 (b) phase of S21
To verify the extracted equivalent circuit model, the timedomain reflectometry (TDR)/ time domain transmission(TDT) and eye-diagram waveforms were measured. A stepsource which has 35ps was used for the TDR/TDT waveformmeasurement, and a pseudo random bit sequence (PRBS)signal generator and a sampling oscilloscope were used forthe eye-diagram measurement. Fig. 7 and 8 show theTDR/TDT and eye-diagram to measure from test device andto simulate from the proposed model, respectively. A goodcorrelation between measurement and simulation was found.
2 3 4Time [nsec]
(b)0.5 TDR source rising time (10 90%) = 35ps
TDT nsing time (20 80%)=45ps0.4 TDT nsing time (10 90%)=140ps
n -- TDRH U.J5
2 0.2HI
0 IDI-0.11
0 1 2 3 4Time [nsec]
5
Fig. 7. A comparison of the measured TDR/TDT with thesimulated TDR/TDT based on the proposed model: (a) thesimulated (b) the measured
Time [20psec/div]
(b)
Time [20psec/div]
remleiiir Fig. 8. A comparison of the measured eye-diagram withthe simulated eye-diagram based on the proposed model(a) the simulated (b) the measured
The magnitude of S21 decreases noticeably as the frequencyincreases, as shown fig. 6. This is due to the losscharacteristics of the silicon substrate (G,ij), since the
10 20 impedance of the insulating oxide capacitance of the via wall(Cvia OX) becomes substantially lower at higher frequencies. Asa result, the TSV leads to degradation of signal rising timewhen a high-speed signal is transmitted through the TSV asshown in the TDT waveforms of Fig. 7. Hence it can cause aninter-symbol interference (ISI) problem for high-speed serialdata transmission and result in degraded timing and voltagemargins. However, the fabricated TSV of Fig 4 can supporttransmitting signal well under a data rate of 10-Gbps asshown in Fig. 8. The eye diagrams keep their opening welland the timing and voltage margin do not decrease. As a
10 20 number of stacked TSV increases, however, the eye diagramworsens. Fig. 9 represents the simulated 10-Gbps eye-diagram
it-based S- according to the number of stacked TSV.
()
-0
Cf
Tiiiie [20pse/iv]
_b.p
_i[_L __
i) I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I
Tiliie [20psec/div]
Fig. 9. The simulated 10-Gbps eye-diagram for stackedchips using the TSV (a) 5 chips stack case (b) 10 chipsstack case.
In the case of five TSVs stack, timing and voltage margins ofthe eye-diagram are much degraded compared with that ofonly one TSV of Fig. 8. When signals are transmitted throughten TSVs stack, the eye-diagram closes completely, so thereare no timing and voltage margins as seen in Fig. 9 (b).
3.3 Contact resistance measurement of through silicon viainterconnection
To measure the electrical characteristics of the 3Dinterconnection structure, chip and substrate specimens withdaisy chain structure were fabricated as shown fig. 10. The
850 2007 Electronic Components and Technology Conference
>CD
C7TE
C .A.
s
Ill-tb 10I
_-203
C/a-
-40
(a)0.5 -
0.4 -
00.3-
2 0.2-H
-o.1L0
-'!-
L ---
5.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Downloaded on February 23,2010 at 21:28:00 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
test samples had a Cu via of 75ptm diameters and 90pmheights.
Fig. 10. (a) A SEM image of bonded chip with Cu vias on
substrate, (b) Cross-sectioned image of daisy chainstructure
Fig. II shows the resistance of the daisy chain specimenas a function of the number of the joint composed of a Cu viaand Cu/Sn bump. Resistance of the daisy specimen was
expressed as Eq. 1 [18];
R(daisy chain) = 2R, + nRc + (n-1) R2 [Eq. I]
In Eq. 1, R(daisy chain) was the resistance of the daisychain, RI was the resistance of the metallization line betweena measurement pad and a Cu/Sn bump, R2 was the resistanceof the metallization line between Cu/Sn bumps, Rc was theresistance of a joint composed of a Cu via and Cu/Sn bumpand n was the number of the joints. Eq. I can be rewritten as
Eq. 2, where the value of (Rc + R2) becomes the slope of thegraph for the resistance of the daisy chain vs. the number ofthe interconnection joints shown in Fig. II
R(daisy chain) = (Rc + R2) n + (2R, - R2) [Eq. 2]
a 1.8
C 1.4
; (Iq.
;^. 1.0;r ,#P*
t 0.6
V.L........... .t
0 24 48 72 96 1 20
Number of bump joint
Fig. 11. Average daisy chain resistance as a function ofnumber of the interconnection joints for specimens withand without Cu via.
The resistance of the metallization line R2 betweenCu/Sn bumps was not affected by the conditions of Cu/Snbump bonding. The R2 value was obtained by calculation as 4mQ. By subtracting the R2 value from the slope of the graphin Fig. 11, the average resistance of interconnection joint (Rc)was evaluated as 9.1 mQ. Resistance of only Cu/Sn bumpcould be measured from without via specimens using same
method. That value was 6.7 mQ, the resistance value of onlyvia can be calculated as 2.4mQ.
4. Conclusions1. A prototype 3D stacked package up to 10 layers with via
of 55ptm dia. and 150ptm pitch was successfully fabricatedon Si interposer.
2. Interlocking bump structure can be applied to 3D stackedpackage to enhance the mechanical and electricalcharacteristics of the joint.
3. High frequency electrical model of the TSV was proposedand the proposed model was verified by eye-diagram andTDR/TDT measurements. It was found that the proposedmodel was accurate up to a frequency of 20-GHz.
4. Contact resistance of the Cu/Sn bump joints of 100 by100pm size was 6.7 mQ and the Cu via resistance of75ptm diameter and 90pm height was 2.4 mQ.
AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the Center for Electronic
Packaging Materials (ERC) of MOST/KOSEF. (grant # RI 1-
2000-085-05001-0 )
851 2007 Electronic Components and Technology Conference
without Cu via
.1. Iu. .u R1 R
Authorized licensed use limited to: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Downloaded on February 23,2010 at 21:28:00 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
References1. S. F. Al-Sarawi et al., A review of 3D Packaging
Technology,", IEEE Trans. CPMT, Vol. 21, No. 1 (1988),pp. 2-14.
2. S. Sheng et al.," A portable multimedia terminal," IEEECommun. Mag., Vol. 30 (1992), pp 64-75.
3. R. E. Terrill et al., " Aladdin: Packaging lessons learned,"Proc. Int. Conf. Multichip Modules, Denver, CO, Apr.1995, pp.7-11.
4. R. Crowley et al., "Three-dimensional electronicspackaging," Tech. Rep., Techsearch Int. Inc. Austin, TX,Nov. 1993, pp. 159-161.
5. 0. Ehrmann et al., " 3-D multichip module," Proc. Int.Conf. Multichip Modules, Denver, CO Apr, 1995, pp. 24-29.
6. H. Kanbach et al., "3D Si-on-Si stack package," , Int.Conf. on High Density Packaging and MCMs,Shanghai, China, 1999, pp 248-253.
7. M. Karnezos et al, "3D packaging promises performance,reliability gains with small footprints and lower profiles,"Chip Scale Review, Vol. 1 (2005), pp. 29.
8. K. Takahashi et al., "Current status of research anddevelopment for three-dimensional chip stacktechnology," Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol.40 (2001), pp.3032-3037.
9. T. Matsumoto et al., "Three-dimensional integrationtechnology based on wafer bonding technique usingmicro-bumps," Ext. Abstr. Int. Conf. Solid State DevicesMater. Osaka., Japan, 1995, pp.1073-1073.
10. P. Ramm et al., "Three dimensional metallization forvertically integrated circuits," Microelectron. Eng., Vol.37 (1997), pp 39-47.
11. S. Linder et. al., "Fabrication technology for waferthrough-hole interconnections and three-dimensionalstacks of chips and wafers," Proc. MEMS, 1994, pp.349-354.
12. M. Koyanagi, H. Kurino, K. Lee, K. Sakmicrona, N.Miyakawa, H. Itani, "Future System-on-Silicon LSISystems," IEEE Micro, Vol. 18, No. 4 (1998), pp 17-22.
13. K. Takahashi et. al., "Development of Advanced 3-DChip Stacking Technology with Ultra-FineInterconnection," Proc 51fh Electronic Components andTechnology Conf, Orlando, FL, May. 2001, pp. 541-546.
14. G. Feng et. al., "Through-Wafer Via Technology for 3-D Packaging," 6th International Conference onElectronic Packaging Technology, 2005, pp 57-60.
15. Y. Tomita et.al., "Advanced Packaging Technologies on3D Stacked LSI utilizing the Micro Interconnections andthe Layered Microthin Encapsulation", Proc 51thElectronic Components and Technology Conf, Orlando,FL, May. 2001, pp 353-360.
16. K. Hara et.al., "The Optimization of Terminal Structurefor Interconnections in 3D Packaging Technology withThrough-Silicon Vias", International Conference onElectronics Packaging, Tokyo, Japan, 2005, pp. 161-166.
17. K. Y. Lee et. al., "New Chip-on-glass and Flip-chipProcesses Using Interlocking Bump Structure Fabricatedby Electrodeposition," 208th ECS Meeting, LosAngeles, California, 2005, abs# 683
18. K. Y. Lee et. al., "Effect of Bonding Stress on theContact Resistance of the Sn/Ag Bump for Chip-on-Glass Bonding Using Non-conductive Adhesive," J.Kor. Inst. Met. Mater., Vol. 43, No. 3 (2005), pp. 248-254.
852 2007 Electronic Components and Technology Conference
Authorized licensed use limited to: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Downloaded on February 23,2010 at 21:28:00 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.