DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

download DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

of 123

description

low speed aerodynamics

Transcript of DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    1/123

    DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics:

    Basic Concepts and Elementary

    FlowsSergey Karabasov

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    2/123

    Part1.1: Basics of inviscid flow

    Introductory lectures: descriptive (0.5-1 week) :

    Aerofoil characteristics, dimensionless

    coefficients, brief introduction on the effects of

    Reynolds number & Mach number, boundary

    layers, separation, stall. Types of aerofoil forspecific applications. Lift/drag ratio. Maximum lift

    coefficient; high lift devices. Control surfaces.

    Finite wings: aspect ratio, wing sweep, slender

    wings.

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    3/123

    Part1.2: Basic concepts and

    elementary flowsElementary flows: (2-2.5 weeks) Fundamentals ofinviscid, incompressible flow: Continuity andBernoulli equations. Definitions of circulation andvorticity. Stokes' theorem. Irrotational flow.Definitions of stream function and velocity

    potential with formulation as Laplace's equation.Kelvin's theorem. Elementary flows: uniform flow,source/sink, doublet and vortex. Complex flows bysuperposition including Rankine oval and circularcylinder with and without circulation. Comparisonwith real flow around a circular cylinder. Kutta-Joukowski lift theorem, aerofoil starting vortex.

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    4/123

    Literature for Part 2

    Low Speed AerodynamicsLectures by H.P. Horton & R.C.Raichura (available on QMplus)

    Fluid DynamicsLectures by S.Nazarenko, Warwick University, 2003

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    5/123

    Concepts used in fluid visualisation

    Eulerian (time line)

    Lagrangian (path line)

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    6/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    7/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    8/123

    Streaklines

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    9/123

    Streamlines

    For steady flows: Streamline = Streakline

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    10/123

    Stream functions

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    11/123

    Streamlines, Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    12/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    13/123

    Velocity components and stream

    function

    Streamline slope:

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    14/123

    Dynamics of Ideal

    FluidsFluid is called Ideal if:

    = const

    (fluid can be incompressible but is not constant. E.g. stratifiedocean water due to variation intemperature or salinity)

    viscosity = 0.

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    15/123

    - Navier-Stokes eqn

    Special case for viscosity =0:

    -Euler Equation

    (ideal flow equation)

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    16/123

    When can viscosity be ignored?

    Ratio of the last term on the RHS to the 2nd LHS term:

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    17/123

    Example of ideal flow,

    UL/v = Re>>1.

    Water: v= 10-6 m2/sec

    Air: v= 1.5 10-5 m2/sec

    U=1m/sec (walking)

    L=1.5m (human)

    Re=105 >>1

    BUT! High Re flow often

    unstable/turbulent reductionof L => less ideal

    Re=15,000

    IDEAL Laminar

    flow with large L

    NON-IDEAL

    turbulence small L

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    18/123

    Aerodynamic bodies: more

    idealattached flow

    Non-aerodynamicAerodynamic

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    19/123

    Ideal flow: derivation of continuity eqn

    s u = 0.

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    20/123

    Ideal flow: derivation of the Momentum

    equation

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    21/123

    Material derivative

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    22/123

    Pressure force and Gravity

    Thus we derived the Euler equations for an ideal flow

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    23/123

    Properties of Ideal Flow

    VorticityBernoulli Theorem

    Potential

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    24/123

    Vorticity: fluid rotation

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    25/123

    Angular velocity in 2D

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    26/123

    Relation with vorticity

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    27/123

    Other form of the Euler equation

    s H(x,y,z,t)

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    28/123

    3D Vorticity equations

    Take curl of both sides:

    Euler equation:

    Note:p does not enter intovorticity eqn

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    29/123

    Two-dimensional flow

    Vorticity is conserved along fluid paths

    E.g. vorticity is a Lagrangian invariant

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    30/123

    2D vortex dynamics

    Vorticity moves with the fluid

    Different colors correspond to

    different values of vorticity

    In these examples there are

    only 4 values of vorticity at all

    times

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    31/123

    Bernoullis thm for steady

    irrotationalflow

    Definition. The flow is irrotationalif thevorticity =0 in this flow.

    For irrotational flow:sH=0

    I.e. His the same constant at any

    streamline

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    32/123

    Applications of Bernoullis thm

    Pipe is horizontal:z1 = z2Same flux (Au=const) => u1 < u2Bernoulli: H=p/ + u2/2 =const =>

    p1 > p2

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    33/123

    Flow down a slope

    nSlope: z1 > z2

    nFree surface =>p1 = p2= patmBernoulli: H=p/ + u2/2 +z =const =>

    nu2 > u1

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    34/123

    Lift on an aerofoil

    nShape: l1 > l2=> u1 > u2

    nBernoulli: H=p/ + u2/2 =const =>

    np2 > p1 => Net force is UP (lift)

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    35/123

    Velocity potential

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    36/123

    and

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    37/123

    Relation between velocity and

    potential

    So:

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    38/123

    Vorticity via potential

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    39/123

    Equipotential lines

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    40/123

    Relation between potential and

    streamfunction

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    41/123

    Geometrical interpretation

    Wasnt that obvious? Recall

    the definition of potential as

    a contour integral across the

    flow

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    42/123

    Both potential and streamfunction

    satisfy Laplace equation

    Irrotational flow condition

    As we saw previously, from the incompressibility condition:

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    43/123

    Combination of several flows

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    44/123

    Finding the potential and velocity of

    irrotational flow

    Laplace equation

    incompressibility

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    45/123

    Example of Bernoulli for a time

    dependent irrotational flow

    This is Bernoullis thm for a time dependent irrotational flow

    It is useful for findingp via given u, but not for finding u

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    46/123

    Conservation laws for Ideal fluids (rotational &

    irrotational)Euler equation:

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    47/123

    Why it is only the kinetic energy and

    not the sum of the kinetic and

    potentialenergies that is conserved?

    Potential energy is conserved too, - due to incompressibility

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    48/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    49/123

    Circulation

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    50/123

    Circulation, Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    51/123

    Stokes theorem

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    52/123

    Example

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    53/123

    Stokes theorem example, Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    54/123

    Kelvin circulation theorem

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    55/123

    Proof

    Use

    Integrating Euler eqn, , we have:

    But this change =0 becausep and are single-valued functions.

    Thus we proved the Theorem.

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    56/123

    Remarks about Kelvin theorem

    1. C denotes a dyedcontour, composed of the same fluid

    particles at any time. The result would not be true for afixed in space C.

    2. Constant density is not essential: Kelvin established his

    result for compressible fluids too.

    3. KT does not require Cto be simply connected, i.e. it does

    not require Cto be spannable by a surface S lying wholly inthe fluid (see the vortex shedding example).

    4. Invicid eqns were used on Conly. If viscosity happens to be

    important elsewhere in the flow away from Cthen KT still

    holds

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    57/123

    Example: vortex shedding

    Viscous only: near aerofoil surface, thinwake, rolled-up starting vortex

    Choose C away from these regions, C

    remains 0

    C = A + B , B = 0A = 0

    Cauchy Lagrange thm persistence

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    58/123

    Cauchy-Lagrange thm: persistence

    of irrotational motion

    Under conditions of KT (ideal flow,conservative forces):

    If a portion of the fluid is initially in theirrotational motion, it will remainirrotational at any time

    U=const:irrotational

    irrotational

    irrotational

    Not irrotational

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    59/123

    Proof of CL theorem

    Prove by contradiction: suppose theflow is irrotational initially but not at alater time for the same portion of

    fluid. Then, because of the Gauss f-la

    one can find contour Cs.t. circulation is

    not 0, but that violates KT

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    60/123

    Remarks about Cauchy-Lagrange

    theorem

    CLT is obvious in 2Dbecause of the vorticityconservation along the

    fluid paths

    It is not obvious in 3D

    because of the vortex

    stretching

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    61/123

    2D ideal flow

    Consider the 2D vorticityequation

    Define a streamfunction y

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    62/123

    Elementary flows

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    63/123

    Elementary flows

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    (d)

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    64/123

    Uniform flow (u,0)

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    65/123

    Point sink or source

    Mass flow rate through a closed surface = constant (+ve = source, -ve=sink)

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    66/123

    Point source, Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    67/123

    Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    68/123

    Point source/sink not at the origin

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    69/123

    Irrotational vortex

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    70/123

    Irrotational vortex, contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    71/123

    Circulation along the path including

    the centreStokes thm:

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    72/123

    For case 5b the circulation is zero

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    73/123

    Strength of the vortex

    0

    For several vortices:

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    74/123

    Streamfunction and velocity potential

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    75/123

    Vortex: contd

    R ki t

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    76/123

    Rankine vortex

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    77/123

    Point vortex

    Irrotational flow everywhereexcept for r=0

    V t di l

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    78/123

    Vortex dipole

    Vorticity moves withthe fluid

    Each vortex is movedby velocity inducedby another vortex atits location

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    79/123

    Dipole example: wingtip vortices

    RAF Tornado

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    80/123

    A gasof point vortices

    Each vortex is moved by the Vwhich is a vector sum of Vs

    produced by all other vortices atits location

    Bio-Savart

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    81/123

    Example: Karman vortex street

    Cloud pattern behind an island (satelliteimage)

    Laboratory experiment: wakebehind an obstacle

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    82/123

    Source-sink pair

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    83/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    84/123

    Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    85/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    86/123

    Calculating the velocity

    and

    There is no stagnation point in this flow!

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    87/123

    The doublet

    St f ti

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    88/123

    =

    Streamfunction

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    89/123

    Potential

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    90/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    91/123

    Overall Strategy for Plotting Streamlines from

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    92/123

    Stream Function

    Write down stream function for flow by appropriately combining individual

    solutions for source, sink and line vortex as a sum:

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) KK+++= yxyxyxyx ,,,, 321 yyyy

    Calculate expressions for vel. components u, vfrom

    xv

    yu

    -=

    =

    yy,

    Note: Huge choice as far as selction of parameters is concerned! Souce strength, vortexdirection of rotation, strength ...

    Determine coord.of stagnation point(s) via u=0 , v=0.

    Determine value of stream function passing through (stagnation) point by

    substituting coordinates of (stagnation) point(s) into the stream function.

    Set stream function equal to the value you have determined for point in

    question.

    Determine values of x, y (or r, ) that satisfy this expression and plot to

    obtain streamline.

    Choose new pointx,y

    q

    Obvious question now is what happens for ...

    Uniform Flow + Source + Sink

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    93/123

    Uniform Flow + Source + Sink

    We consider symmetric case where:

    Source

    Sink

    Strength Location

    m

    m-

    ( )0,c-

    ( )0,cUsing superposition, can readily write stream function for this flow:

    ( )

    --

    ++= --

    cx

    ym

    cx

    ymyUyx

    11tantan,y

    {

    flowUniform

    44 344 21

    )0,(atSource c-44 344 21

    )0,(atSink c

    Second and third terms can be combined using:

    ( ) ( )

    +

    -=- ---

    ba

    baba

    1tantantan 111

    To give a more concise form for stream function

    ( )

    -+-= - 222

    1 2tan,cyx

    ycmyUyxy

    (1)

    Continued...

    From either of the two forms of S F on previous slide one can determine velocity components

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    94/123

    Now find stagnation points, where u=v=0. From Eq. (3) one sees that when y=0 then v=0.

    ( ) ( )

    +-

    --

    ++

    ++=

    = 2222 ycx

    cx

    ycx

    cxmU

    yu

    y

    ( ) ( )

    +-

    -

    ++

    =

    -=

    2222

    11

    ycxycx

    ym

    x

    v y

    From either of the two forms of S.F. on previous slide, one can determine velocity components

    (2)

    (3)

    Substitute y=0 into Eq. (2) and then find value of x which gives that u=0.

    After some manipulation the solutions forxare:

    LUcmcx =

    +=

    2

    1

    21

    Hence, stagnation points at:

    ( )0,Land( )0,L-

    Now determine value of S.F. for surface streamline from Eq (1).

    ( )

    --

    ++= --

    cx

    ymcx

    ymyUyx

    11

    tantan,y (1) - repeated

    It can be seen that this is trivial and that 0=Sy

    Continued...

    Rankine Oval then looks like

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    95/123

    Rankine Oval then looks like ...

    We already determined value ofL. Can

    find points of maximum velocity and

    minimum pressure at shoulders +/-h, of

    oval using similar methods. All these

    parameters are a function of the...

    2

    1

    21

    +=

    cU

    m

    c

    L ( )22max121

    chcUm

    Uu

    ++=

    cU

    md

    =

    In summary one obtains

    As one increases dimensionless parameter d from

    zero to large values, oval shape increases in size and

    thickness from flat plate of length 2c to huge, nearly

    circularcylinder. Here think of increase when

    All Rankine ovals, except very thin ones, have large

    adverse pressure gradient on leeward surface. Thus,

    boundary-layer will separate in rear, broad wake

    flow develops, inviscid pattern unrealistic in that

    region.

    constUandconstc == .

    basic dimensionless parameter

    =

    cUm

    ahch

    2cot

    =Uma

    Incompressible, inviscid, two-

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    96/123

    dimensional flow over a cylinder:

    uniform flow + doublet

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    97/123

    Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    98/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    99/123

    Stagnation streamline

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    100/123

    Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    101/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    102/123

    Pressure variation on the cylinder

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    103/123

    Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    104/123

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    105/123

    Re=

    Resolution of the DAlembert paradox

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    106/123

    Resolution of the D Alembert paradox

    Drag on the bluff bodies is finitebecause the flow fails to be idealbehind them due to the flowseparation

    No separation

    minimal drag

    aerodynamic shape

    Turbulent re attachment

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    107/123

    Drag crisisTurbulent re-attachmentleads to drag reduction

    Uniform flow + doublet +vortex (lifting

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    108/123

    cylinder)

    d

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    109/123

    Contd

    l d b

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    110/123

    Velocity distribution

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    111/123

    Case r=R

    C d

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    112/123

    Contd

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    113/123

    Case: /2 3/2

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    114/123

    Case: =/2, 3/2

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    115/123

    C td

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    116/123

    Contd

    P di t ib ti d f

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    117/123

    Pressure distribution and forces

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    118/123

    Symmetry Force calculation

    Lift

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    119/123

    Lift

    C td

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    120/123

    Contd

    K tta J ko ski

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    121/123

    Kutta-Jukowski

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    122/123

    Zhukovski lift theorem

  • 5/20/2018 DEN233 Low Speed Aerodynamics-week2-3

    123/123